Hate to even ask, but did the GK trip the attacker by contacting the attackers left foot before contacting the ball? In which case should we have a PK. This would be 3 things to look at in one VAR moment.
This show doesn't go over plays which didn't result in an on field review. I think it would be nice if they did in some cases, but that leaves the door open for questions about why certain plays weren't talked about.
@@Me9adethFan EVERY play is reviewed by VAR in the booth during live action or prior to the next restart So, yes, goals are reviewed. Not every play, however, has an on field review by the center referee which is the difference. So in that case, unless the center referee went to the monitor, then it wouldn't be something typically talked about here.
It's different for accidental handballs leading to a goal. Law 12: "It is an offence if a player...scores in the opponents’ goal...immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental"
Rules are different for attacker handballs. If there’s any handball in the attacking phase by an attacker leading to a goal, intent and attempts to brace oneself on the ground are irrelevant and it is a handball offense The double standard exists because 1. Defender handballs usually carry a much greater punishment (penalty kick) and 2. A defender is much more likely to be in a situation where their safety would be in danger by avoiding a handball
Hate to even ask, but did the GK trip the attacker by contacting the attackers left foot before contacting the ball? In which case should we have a PK. This would be 3 things to look at in one VAR moment.
Why didn’t you show the SKC non offsides call, I would have liked to hear this conversation
This show doesn't go over plays which didn't result in an on field review. I think it would be nice if they did in some cases, but that leaves the door open for questions about why certain plays weren't talked about.
Except it did result in a goal which, if I remember correctly for all scoring plays, are automatically reviewed
@@Me9adethFan it wasn’t sent to the field for review, but yeah it was checked
@@Me9adethFan EVERY play is reviewed by VAR in the booth during live action or prior to the next restart So, yes, goals are reviewed. Not every play, however, has an on field review by the center referee which is the difference. So in that case, unless the center referee went to the monitor, then it wouldn't be something typically talked about here.
I don’t understand if a defender use his hand to brace him self when sliding and the ball catches his hand no hand ball
It's different for accidental handballs leading to a goal. Law 12: "It is an offence if a player...scores in the opponents’ goal...immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental"
@@johnmcgimpsey1825 great explanation thank you
You can't score/gain an immediate goal scoring opportunity off the hand, even if accidental
But no kubo is the attacker using his hand to keep him self up and it’s a hand ball this makes no sense
Rules are different for attacker handballs. If there’s any handball in the attacking phase by an attacker leading to a goal, intent and attempts to brace oneself on the ground are irrelevant and it is a handball offense
The double standard exists because 1. Defender handballs usually carry a much greater punishment (penalty kick) and 2. A defender is much more likely to be in a situation where their safety would be in danger by avoiding a handball