Hawley Tells Biden Judicial Nom He Thinks She's Pretending Not To Know Case Law To Avoid Answering
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2021
- At Tuesday's Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) questioned Tovah R. Calderon, nominee to be an Associate Judge, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, about her inability to answer his questions on voting rights and religious liberty..
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
When people applying for a job and refuse to answer questions related to said job, it should be an automatic disqualification.
I fully agree!.!
She’s tap-dancing like a typical politician…! She may indeed be qualified.
But what does that say about out “system” # smdh
th-cam.com/video/aj1Rwlztapg/w-d-xo.html
@Jones Drew this country doesn't have 20years. . . But I get what you're saying I suppose
@@TruthOverEverything717 yes, and yes
If she truly doesn't know case law on these issues, she has no business being a nominee for any Judgeship..
th-cam.com/video/aj1Rwlztapg/w-d-xo.html
She should especially be prepared for questioning by Josh Hawley who knows the law inside out and backwards and can recite volumes from memory alone.
Are you an attorney, Dim Bulb? I'm thinking no. No attorney or judge knows every single piece of case law. That's why firms and courts have law libraries. Even if familiar with a particular case, you would still look it up as a matter of routine. These are just a bunch of "gotcha" questions designed to put the woman on the spot and make Hawley looks smart.
@@r.mcbride2837
I'm guessing you're not an attorney either, are you clown?
Asking relevent case law isn't just a bunch of "gotcha" questions. She clearly knows NOTHING about MAJOR case law, that's why he's asking.
At least he didn't ask her what her religious background is (which would be illegal), then run to the media to spin hyperbole, like democrats do.
@@hawkeyeted Sorry to disappoint, but, yes. Attorney here. Passed the bar and the whole nine yards. Former public defender, former assistant prosecutor, state, then federal. Now in private practice.
It's not that she knows nothing about "major case law", as you put it. It's about her continually indicating to him what her wheelhouse has been and him ignoring that and continually peppering her with irrelevant questions well outside the scope of her previous practices. Think of it as if you are a cardiologist and I keep asking you to explain nephrology principles and techniques. The guy is just show boating and she's trying to be nice about it. It's obvious to any one who IS an attorney. But you wouldn't know that.
“I’m not going to tell you HOW I will do the job, just hire me!” - they ARE as dumb as they look!
She absolutely refuses to answer the questions: she's playing uninformed because she doesn't have written or oral statements that are a problem. She's avoiding the questions and trying to skate past.
Goes to show, if your dumb its not an act.
Yeah, you have to pass the bill in order to know what is in the bill, it worked unfortunately.
God help us! How do they even get thru a day?
@@cornpopishuntersrealdaddy4690 true!
This is a perfect example of how conservatives can weed out leftist judges.
Yep! 😊🙏❤️🇺🇸💎
😆 just like how Trump “drained the swamp” right? 🤣 Give me a break, Republican leaders are just as worthless as the left ones.
@@JOkERBIDEN a lot of republicans are. Trump drained only part of the swamp. His republican haters aka RINOs resisted him as much as the democrats. He was vastly out numbered. Even his VP turned against him in the end but it ain't over. Trump doesn't make America great either, we do. He just made policies easier to achieve that goal. As a conservative Libertarian, I will vote for him again in 2024. I hope you see what's going on and do the same.
I'd say it's a perfect example of how narrow minded and obsessively focused certain "conservative" people can be. He ALWAYS focusses on the same issues over and over again. So utterly predictable and boring.
@@davidwatermeyer5421 Well when you are asking someone a very important question, and they do literally everything they can do to avoid it, then they're not worth a damn and can not be confirmed. If you can't understand that, then you need to do some self-reflection.
She's lying
Shes playing dumb to avoid having to actually justify her biases.
Exactly, she's doin the vernacular tango to try and dance around the real questions. Applause to Hawley for recognizing and calling out the mental gymnastics.
Doing the newsome.. just do/say what you want.. the deck is stacked in your favor anyway.
Agree; GOP nominees are the same as these judges being vetted. So there's basically nothing to see.
Still butthurt over kavenaugh? Wow, maybe get a life?
@@swann433 imagine if Brett cavanaugh had acted in this manner...
Instead he was given a special “trial” for nonsense..
This shit is so blatant anymore.
Depressing
Her bias is unacceptable. The fact that she can't answer any questions is unacceptable.
I'd have followed up asking if she had donated to any Republican candidates. Her bias is so stark, it's blinding!
I really have been enjoying listening to him grill the ones that are obviously not being Truthful.. He is a very confident individual.
Yet he basically does nothing to stop them. True Republican leader right there.
@@JOkERBIDEN atleast hes not doing what democrats do, take bribes and help big tech censor and control. Mark zuckerberg spent 400 million during the election to make sure biden won.
When you have the truth on your side, it makes things much easier.
Yeah she is a no
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 Isn't it funny that we all can see it, but Biden can't????
💯
She worked for scheeemer .. then she is disqualified
@President Potato Very Good Point! Normal people wouldn't tolerate working with horrible people
th-cam.com/video/aj1Rwlztapg/w-d-xo.html
Your views don't matter ... She'll be elected ... And your country is doomed 😂😂
@@deepa92pol That's refreshingly candid. I feel like we're in a marathon and just wondering if we'll run out of gas before the finish line. These people are hurdles. Dangerous hurdles...
@@deepa92pol 👆💩
Tovah R. Calderon describes herself as _"generalist"._ Does that mean that she can't do anything specific particularly well without cramming the night before? I think Sen. Josh Hawley is right; she is avoiding revealing her political bias by avoiding admitting knowledge and hence an opinion on particular cases.
He scared her when he showed her she obviously didn't know anything.
He didn't scare her at all. Her nervousness was because she didn't want to be public speaking anymore. She knows that if the Left wants her in, she will get in.
She expects us to believe, she doesn't stay up-to-date on current decisions. Every attorney that I know does. She gets a 👎
The HOWDIE DOOTIE SCHOOL OF JUSTICE!
th-cam.com/video/aj1Rwlztapg/w-d-xo.html
Describe what the videos about, or don't post it.
I stay up to date on decisions and I'm not even a lawyer! This lady is useless. Just another Biden plant to help overthrow our constitution.
This admin has tried and succeeded at confirming countless activists to judicial positions in the past 9 months. We're screwed unless we the people stand up to this nonsense.
@@justkim9827 Sadly, the majority of people don't seem to understand how important this is, until it's too late.
"Thank you for that question"=stonewalling.
That's a primer for forthcoming lie.
@@rickkeeton9246, he is neither.
And his name is spelled K a v a n a u g h.
CLASSIC!!!!!👍👍👍👍👍
It's a running out the clock tactic.
@@lakelanddentalarts pretty much
Tovah is lying about knowing about this case. She’s evasive
She's lying her @$$ off!😎
He's throwing the truth! If she's donating to Dems they will for sure be returning the favor for their benefit
Hawley is a wrecking machine, loving what he's doing in these hearings.
Senator Hawley knows the laws and he's one in a million in Congress and we are fortunate to have him. A few more also, but for the most part Our Government is loaded with people taking as much from us as they can and in addition jacking up their bank accounts from lobbyist to push their own interests. Government is corrupt period. Very few of them are honest and decent
Law biding individuals....They
are not for the USA and we the taxpayers who work tirelessly everyday have to give them a sizeable income to represent us.
We need more like him in Congress.
Only matters if he votes to NOT confirm
@@rdf098311 That's very true.
@@maureenminer3877 Wrong! He is a traitor to our country and raised his fist in support of the insurgents at the Capitol on January 6th. He perpetuated TRUMP'S BIG LIE that led to the deaths of innocent people. HE WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!!!
Hawley is more how I imagined a Presidential candidate would speak…
Hawley would be a great pick for President. At least he is honest and sincere. Has anyone seen honesty or sensarity out of Biden?
I would vote for him, in 2028.
@Nytram Nytram4348 - Nah, it’s only Trump 2024 🇺🇸
I agree, he seems like he would respect the constitution and the separation of church and state.
I'm not American but very impressed with this gentlemen, from what I have seen of him. Its a pity to see that there is much potential in our countries which is too often not reflected in the leaders we choose.
This felt like Con Law I when a student is wholly unprepared for class. Been there.
Cringeworthy! 😬
Try to make her look stupid but apparently she isn't because she's sitting in front of him 20 years plus under her belt as a lawyer😎😎😎!
If they don’t answer questions, throw them in jail.
You go Senator Hawley!!! Keep fighting for America!! 🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷👏👏👏
My question is did she just go through the wrong door or something? Does she realize that this is about a judgeship or does she think this is an interview for Walmart?
Seriously, someone looking to be a judge should have some interest in and knowledge of case law.
She probably has just seen the shit work that these radical right wing Republican Supreme Court justices are doing!She figures anybody could be a judge if they can make it!
👏👏👏👏👏👏
I love people who believe they have learned a new term and then try to use them. Define "case law". She told Hawsey about the breadth of her work over the past 20 years and he kept harping on issues that weren't within her purview. It's pretty obvious he isn't really interested in her qualifications, rather he is bloviating for the cameras
@@Sooopa_Doopa ah, so, is she trying out for her old job?
Frankly, if I applied to be a computer programmer they would probably ask me computer type questions to see if I'm qualified. Now, do you suppose just saying "that's not in my purview" is an acceptable answer? Should I be hired?
Rick: did you not see Amy coney Barrett school all the dem senators in her confirmation.. liberals are morons and are the true pandemic
This women sounds like she’s interviewing for a job instead of answering the direct question
seems like the senator has mire knowledge mr. hawley is a graduate of stanford and yale
Hauley, a truly American whom care to MAGA and hopefully one day he will run for President we should need a American like Hauley for President.
Agree. Trump was like a novice pilot in B1 bomber. He got it off the ground but didn't know what all the buttons are. So he put it in auto pilot, & Dems wrecked him.
We need an attorney( Disantis/ Hawley) when Dems pull their crap. Press button: Boop... nuked.
@@roberttyrrell2250 Boop...nuked. lol I'm gonna use that phrase from now on. Quality work there, Bob.
@@ronjones-6977 Be sure to purchase my "Boop nuked".T shirts & hoodie merch. 😁
I'm having a hard time believing this person is a judge
A judge on "The Gong Show" maybe...
she's NOT a judge. she's a career attorney with the D.O.J.
Every time they are going to lie, they say, "thank you for letting me answer the question Senator." Its wierd.
They are programmed
No it's a classic lame tactic, so is it when they say, thank you for that good question, stall, stall, stall, smile!! I am so disgusted, seeing this go on day by day!! Just more of Biden's circus clowns!! I think we are in more trouble than folks realize!!
Stalling to use up the time. That's why they say that over and over. Thank you Senator.
Hate it when they make a senator salad with saying it over and over during an answer like brown nosing will help them.
Get rid of her. She lies.
Josh Hawley is a Constitution and Supreme Court MASTER!
EVERYONE in our political arena needs to be given lie detectors before they take office.
Wouldn’t THAT be interesting
@@mermaidtales3639 Except sociopath's have no morals or ethics, they have no emotions just power and to control us. They lie with ease.
Love our Senator Josh Hawley... God Bless this man for standing up and fighting for us.
the guy is a bully . You like bullies i guess. Good for you.
@@leifseed what's wrong the truth hurt??? What you call a bully all i see is a man that is accurately dismantling the hypocrisy of the left if you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen
@@jeffreyhood3209 Ya true, no it didn't hurt I just think people can be more reasonable with eachother. There was no hypocracy here, she just didn't want to get bullied by giving her real opinions. That was wrong, she probably has good opinions, which any idiot republican will disagree with.
@@leifseed there is always hypocrisy with the left, Democrats are drenched in hypocrisy, look at this small interaction we have had, I never said anything negative and yet you come out swinging (that's hypocrisy when you advocate for people to be more reasonable with each other and in the same breathe call them a idiot) wow can't even see the train when it's right in front of your face
@@jeffreyhood3209 let's talk hypocrisy. Republicans are responsible for 7.8 trillion in US debt during trumps term. Now they say no more spending and the sheep follow. The infrastructure bill will create jobs. Something Trump didn't do with 3 trillion in Covid aid.
She’s not prepared at all for any of his Constitutional law questions ensuring our Civil liberties!
because these people are not about Civil Liberties. LIberal ideology is emotional, you cannot play emotional AND critical. The moment you get black and white about Liberal Ideology, it falls apart. Because they have to play compassion instead of honest.
If you are a Liberal reading this.. stop playing like you give a shit, and actually be an honest person. People who care, are honest about problems.
Pretending to care is psychopathic. adult children playing revolutionary for your self image.
"civil liberties"? translated; plenary congressional privileges? only slaves are assigned civil "liberties"; man(kind) possess natural right(s) of life-liberty-happiness, his(her) only duty is to keep his hands to himself; the only duty of a Court/Jury is to adjudicate remedy when the wrongdoer refuses to right his wrong; what is being discussed at this hearing concerns the management of serfs (US citizens) by the Lord of the Manor ((plenary Congress) by voluntary US citizen servitude); the Republic (Articles of Confederation) was arrested by the CONstitution, the post (non declared civil war) "re-construction" established a Feudal government (Cf: US v Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649 1898); there is no such thing as a "United States citizen", Cf: Ex parte Frank Knowles CA 1855; Cf: Certificate of non citizen national; a Birth Certificate IS an indenture BOND (warehouse receipt) that takes the character of the commodity (person/surety) and should be rebutted at age of maturity (Cf: From Sovereign To Serf by Roger Sayles)...
@@myd0gr3xjust a waste
@@719Flowers "Objection" clarification...
she may be pretending
Senator Hawley is awesome and we need more like him! And she's lying.
If a nominee can’t answer questions directed at the job they are wanting … then they should be disqualified.
I hope Trump is keeping a list of all these appointees. So he can say, YOU'RE FIRED! When he's reinstalled or reelected
he cant do that
@Carolyn Petrey who cares, just fire them anyways
@@samanderson5359 WE can do it.. the people..
😃 🙂 😺
A lie detection device should be used at all times in government communications. I'd like to see an overlay on the screen showing TRUE OR LIE!
Yeah, it should be a sword, dangling by a thread above their heads.
Otherwise know as the people.
If such a device existed then that would be a great idea.
Absolutely
Cops wear body cams, why cant they?
And that’s why I will always vote for Hawley.
All of Biden's nominees, regardless of the question, say "Thank you for the question Senator." I find it a bit off-putting.
These nominees this administration is putting forth are shocking.
This is truly a sinister plan from all the Dem's, they are not even trying to slide it under the rug, they are blatantly shoving it in our faces! & since no one will stop this debacle, they will carry on until our great country is demolished & unrecognizable!!Wake up folks this is war!!
The nomination demonstrates Biden's judgment
Is it shocking? I mean, we know that this is who they are, right? Why is anyone opposed to the administration shocked by anything that it does?
Come on man really when has potato joe made a good decision his whole political career
They are embarrassingly repugnant 👎🏻
"Thank you for asking" is a primer for a practiced lie
YEP!
It always annoys me!
That’s true. They are taught to say that in order to give themselves a second to think in the lie. It also allows them to get words out that are so practiced that they don’t come out shaky as their words would if they launched straight into a lie. Practiced deception avoidance techniques
It gives the people in her head time to look up the right answer
I absolutely love Sen. Hawley. He tells it like it is without sugarcoating anything, yet stills remains about as nice, gentle, and respectful as you possibly can be while trying to tell a person that you believe they are lying to you!
I agree with you!! 😊
I love how eloquent Hawley asks his, very relevant questions! It just shows the word games the Democrats use to dodge very important issues! Frankly, I am sick and tired of them not being upfront with their agenda. I know I am not the only one who feels this way!
Love this man so thorough.
Isn’t that the same thing you said about Rudy Fooliani?
Me too!
@@rickkeeton9246 why... Are you stalking me... That's a while ago if I said it.
Amazing when they “don’t know things”. Kinda like selective hearing….. selective answering
Judges don’t like to comment on cases they haven’t read the documents of both sides and the holding.
No judge knows everything. No Supreme Court justice knows every law. That’s why it takes months to write the opinions with the help of others lawyers that work for each Justice. Without context of how courts work and how judges work, the Senator makes the nominee look stupid while the audience has no context.
@@leslienorman286 It's their job to know the law, especially from new and important cases. She is unfit to be a Supreme Court justice and made herself look stupid.
Well stated! It's always the cases that go against their activism that seem to escape their purview. Really, really strange
@Nytram Nytram4348
That’s mighty white supremacists of you!
She seems like she has limited experience and lack of knowledge. Did she even prepare for this? Under qualified or purposely elusive.
Either way... Next.
A Civil Rights DAG nominee to D.C. District Court of Appeals who HAS NOT READ an opinion in rendering a ban on First Amendment restrictions to religious rights BY THAT VERY DISTRICT COURT ???
How in the hell can she claim being qualified when not even up-to-date on her job-related, necessary to be informed reading of a court opinion to which she could have later been a DAG litigant ???
She's either lying or openly admitting that she is woefully unqualified for the position. Or both.
Hawley himself notes her qualifications.
It shows how a once highly respected profession has become a political power grab. Shame on corrupt judges.
I appreciate shedding light on these nominees to reveal their true opinions, viewpoints and political engagement. It all affects the way they apply law, president and the people of our country.
“My approach as a generalist” … haha! That’s a new one.
We've found Psaki's replacement.
I'm sure they will circle back to her.
You go senator Hawley
Wow just wow. She is an expert at dodging the questions. That's all she will be good at.
"Thank you x that question Senator" ( lol ) = smirk.
What they ignore is that it is a bait.
Yah blessed you w a fiery intelligence & much wisdom. Thank you Senator Hawley, we love you! 🙏❤🙌🕊
When all else fails play stupid, been working for democrats for decades
Ya play stupid, do drugs, sexually assault someone, steal money, lie to congress, sleep with Chinese spies, spend tax payers money, weaponize terrorists, desert Americans and Allies, bow to Chinese, win Nobel peace prizes for war, win Emmys for murdering old people and then top it off by writing a book about how wonderful of a job you did at it!!
@@donnaridings1219 love the way you think!
@@jamesharris4775 YOU TOO!
@@jamesharris4775 oh and what they're best at, overwhelm the system, distract from the most recent f- up, move onto the next crisis and say well don't dwell on the past, be unapologetically hypocritical and as Rahm would say "never let a crisis go to waste"
Sen.Hawley is one intelligent man.I would not like to be in front of him.
Ms.Calderon is no different than the rest and Hawley is exposing her.
Or......just hear me out! He has plenty of time to prepare for the specific case law involved in the question he's asking. She has to know every finding on every case in history in order to be prepared for any question posed. I'm sure he is intelligent but to imply she's not because she doesn't have prepared answers for any question that may be posed is just silly!
It's amazing that we should be amazed by a man in Congress actually doing his job and demanding the truth from others.
For someone vying for such a prestigious position; it's hard to believe in their position that they wouldn't be following cases, or educated in recent decisions at such high levels of our government.
Pretending to be IGNORANT does not excuse STUPID
Well at work for Trump!
But of course he’s both ignorant and stupid!
Imagine answering questions like this at an interview... 😵
YOUR FIRED IS WJAT YOUD HEAR
Thank you for asking the question but the fries from McDonald’s are not as good as Burger King. Respectfully I can not answer that question because I can’t judge on side I don’t eat at.
She’s unqualified PERIOD !
imagine going to an interview, not being able to, or simply refusing to answer the questions and then expecting to get the job..........
Ask all judges when the last time was they decided a case against their own personal beliefs in favor of the law.
Great idea
They never get anything out of anyone ever in congress. It's really hard to watch. How come we never get any actual answers with anything?
Thats enough information to justifiably conclude they r liars. Waste no more time on these evaders
Pleading ignorance is never a suitable tactic in a job interview.
Has ANY judicial nominee since Robert Bork ever given a direct answer to a direct question? I think they only direct question they've answered since then is: "State your name." and they would obfuscate that if they could.
How the hell can she not know case law on important decisions rendered by the very court she is being appointed to? That's like asking a fireman if he knows what fire is.
So a year or two with barry and 4 years of trump makes her qualified for what exactly?
Not qualified for dog catcher.
If I was looking at hiring a programmer, and she said she couldn't remember the name of the coding language, the interview would be over in 30 seconds.
Lol are you saying your a coding god that knows every language in and out? fart simpson its hard to take u fucking seriously.
well everyone has their talents dont they 🙃
@@errantstorm Thank you for your input...now put away your finger pants and put on your helmet, it's time for recess.
To anyone with a brain it's obvious that the coding language is specified in the job description...Duh!!
@@fartsimpson8610 You're wrong. This isn't coding, this is a specific case out of millions.
@@Lappelduvideify Um...what do you think lawyers do in law school all day? I'm not a lawyer and I remember this case as it was pivotal in assessing the power of the state to curb freedom of assembly as allowed under the first amendment.
The fact she says she hasn't read the case law says as much about her seriousness as a legal mind as it does about her knowledge of the individual case. I can assure you that Alan Dershowitz, for example, knows this one inside and out.
Like most of these token appointees, she is a joke.
Let’s Go Brandon!! Who the heck are these nominees? What rock did they crawl out of ? It is mind boggling downright outrageous these nominees are even before the senate as potential candidates! Dear God they are destroying our country!
Deny her nomination... NEXT!
Thank you Senator Hawley 🙏🌲
Watch her Hawley she's lieing!!!
Senator Hawley 👏👏👏👏👏 Thank you for being the voice for the majority of American citizens! GOD bless you and yours! 🙏❤️🇺🇸💎😊
That's exactly what it appears to me that she is doing
“Liberal judges are impartial...conservatives aren’t.” Got it!
th-cam.com/video/aj1Rwlztapg/w-d-xo.html
Liberal judges are activist partisan hacks-got it!
That is why Liberal DA's and Judges set alledged fellons back to the streets for further proof that they commit acts of felony. Chicago, Portland, LA, etc..
I really wish Americans would stop labeling leftist authoritarians as Liberals. She not a Liberal, she s a Progressive. The Democrats are not Liberals either. Examples of real American Liberals are the Founding Fathers. Do you think the Founding Fathers would agree with all this leftist authoritarianism? I highly doubt it.
I doubt it.
Oh yeah... yet _another_ Affirmative Action nominee. Time to overturn the 19th Amendment.
The only actual solution.
"My therapist says I giggle when I'm nervous."
I am concerned as well Senator, good job.
What’s the point of testifying in front of congress if you can’t answer anything, this is a pattern with every single nominees.
Everyday the one is like a stupid broken record Several dumbasses in that group.
She’s an ACTIVIST
Aren't they all.
"Thank you for that question." is code for "I'm not going to answer it."
Every nominee has been exactly like this, including ones that have been accepted.
This lady applying for a job at a potato farm: I'm sorry, what is a "potato"? Is it a kind of bread?
😂😂😂
Technically, potato bread is a thing. lol
@@revengeneutral8164 And very tasty!
Can you put that in a form of a potato?
😂😂
Love Sen. Hawley!
He would make a great House Speaker!
If these "nominees " continue to dance around questions asked or even refuse to answer questions claiming they don't know. They should not fill the positions they've been nominated for. Period!!!!
Republican nominees play the same game, all the while Republicans sit back and allow it. I'm sick of the games in politics.
You're saying that on a clip of a Republican who literally refused a trump nominee because of their checkered past.
She looks like she has 17 cats.
Hahahhahaha LMAO!!!!!! YESSSS!!!!- and doesn't use deodorant or shave! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@smart viewer have a sense of humor😂😂😂 it's true AND FUNNY!!! You know she goes out to her lime colored Prius and home to her LGBTQRXYZ PARTNER and 35 cats. Stops off at WHOLE FOODS TO GET THEM DINNER (the cats😂) Then by McD's for her😂😂 and home. Takes off her 25 yr old stank Birkenstocks and kicks it up by the couch watching CNN!
@smart viewer you are absolutely right, on all counts. but tell me she doesn't have a crazy cat lady vibe also. they are usually better at looking employable.
"My record of serving". Love these people who think they are serving the public and are somehow better than people not being paid by the taxpayers.
That record of "service" is a major red flag and should be considered a disqualifying factor.
"Thank you for asking that question"... BIG RED FLAG. All of these Dem Noms say this to lie and run the clock down. They have ALL been trained to LIE
She’s a Marxist Activist Lunatic. She’s not Serving the American People, that’s for damn sure!!
@@dcb1138 That’s exactly it. They’ve been coached to Lie & Subvert the Constitution & the American People! She will never be a Fair & Impartial Judge. Hell No to the Confirmation!
Damn he’s good! He was tough but fair, and extremely measured in his cross-examination and repartee with her about her stance on these issues. Well done, sir!👏👏👏
It's like trying to interview a 16 year old...
I love how Hauley weeds throu these activist that won't answer his questions, (classic )
weeds is the perfect word
He is a beast with the deflectors and liars!! 🥰
Kennedy does it best
I didn’t like how he ran for and won state office and then immediately went for Senate, but I do appreciate how he takes no BS from nominees
@@Wherestheredwave Totally agree. He left those folks out in the rain, but perhaps he knew he could do more good in the Senate.
She can decide small claims and traffic tickets, I would not even trust her with family law.
I wouldn't let her judge a hotdog eating contest..
@@jerrythompson2608 Ok, but what if they were Kosher hotdogs?
@Jon Dau Beeep!--I believe you have reached the limit for big words permissible in a single sentence here.
don't let her fool you she's an actress a wolf in sheeps clothing
I doubt she can do that in a competent manner.
Nominees need to be polygraphed……. Word
Disqualified. Immediately.
We should slow these hearings down to a crawl until the nominees can actually answer a question.
Unless... they are conservative nominees. In that case, put on your roller skates!!!
Democrats never answer yes or no
Then we’d never get anything done. Nobody ever answers a question. No matter what party they’re affiliated with.
Newsflash, all Republican and Democrat nominees always avoid questions.
Josh Hawley is amazing
Despite their objections one must continue to shine the light of truth on these loathsome criminals and their crimes.
Only in its glare do their lies wither and die , it is the potent weapon they can not defend against.
Love the heat, don’t let up
She's history
Nah, dems will shoe horn her in anyway. Its all theater, they just roll them down a conveyor belt of crazy and confirm them all.
Cruz, Hawley and Kennedy are gonna cause one of these shitty nominations to yeet themselves from the mortal coil if they keep roasting them like Hiroshima in 1945.
We do have some good ones in Senate Judiciary. Awful leadership, but some bright spots.
No they are going to approve the Nominations. They too are part of the problem.
@@michaelseidenberg2323 they didn't approve that ATF nominee tho
😂😂😂😂
@@michaelseidenberg2323 Hawley has voted no on everyone he said he has reservations about. He has actively fought against those he sees as being deceptive or being to partisan. The ones he has approved were the ones who answered his questions and addressed openly their previous partisan actions. We need judges who will be honest, even if that honesty shows a very partisan past. Because if they can admit to being partisan publicly they will if needed recuse themselves. If they can not be honest about partisan pasts then they will not honestly evaluate their ability to fairly judge a case.
What a waste.
The only answer they give is - thank you for that question.