Fr Chad Ripperger, PhD on Metaphysics, Evolution, Divorce & Remarriage
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- Fr. Ripperger rejoins us for a serious conversation on Metaphysics, its importance, the Thomistic tradition in metaphysics and how the modern philosophy and evolution are opposed to the principles of metaphysics and are the main cause for divorce and remarriage. You’ll want to listen to this one twice. For more & the notes please visit athanasiuscm.o... & remember to say 3 Hail Marys for the priest
For more sermons & lectures please visit
sensustradition... & remember to do the PenanceWare Fr asks for
Fr Ripperger's order of exorcists dolorans.org/
The website sensusfidelium...
To donate please visit sensusfidelium...
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.213 | กรีน อัษฎาพร | 3 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3KrlLbCsadI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 82 วันนี้!! คู่เอก | ยอดไอคิว vs อับดัลลาห์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hSsyTl_9bqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Pearls of wisdom freely flows the mouth of this man. Wow.
flow
Sensus fidelium. Keep up the good work. Many, many, many people will call you crazy and say what you say is untrue. But i whole heartedly believe what fr ripperger says (sorry for mispelling). This craze about evolution and this desire that catholics HAVE to HAVE some answer as to our creation outside of scripture, as though scripture telling us we were created by God is not enough, is outrageous. Keep going. You guys are great.
I'm glad now, I never married, have no children, have nothing to show so far as this world is concerned, in 58 years of existence. I may die a homeless pauper, but there's less chance of falling into mortal sin and losing my soul.
Marie Katherine so true.
I'm glad also that I had no kids, when I see what goes on with people around me and their children.
Okay, Protestant. Differ your existence.
I'm 58. Wanna get married?
LMBO 😋💚
@@sue-by7sh
I smell copout. Lol 😉
What the name of music at the beginning?
Simply because we evolved, that does not mean that we do not have a nature, so natural law still applies. And since God causes everything, the nature we have is the will of God. I understand that some secularists think like this, but it isn't really true.
Evolution didn't happen. Its a false, naturalistic theory.
Please show me proof of evolution.
Beech Bear well.. the origin of life started as a single celled organism. As the genetic material broke down, mutated and the code became more and more corrupted it also became more advanced. This process eventually produced humans. If you corrupt the code of a simple organism it turns into a far, far, far more advanced complex organism. You just have a wait some-odd billions of years.
Instaurare Omnia In Christo it was a joke, my friend 😎
oh my😊
22:54 It did come true. People literally say that.
Berkeley was a materialist? If he's talking about the 18th-century bishop, that Berkeley was a metaphysical idealist who argued for his metaphysical idealism to reply to materialism. Maybe Father misspoke?
Even the “Miracle of Sun” proves that scientists have long lost their sights from what they shall look objectively in their life. One wonder how their soul felt upon their death: when they realize that whatever we perceive in this earthly life are all come through our soul, that too only if He allow! Perhaps, the list of well known ‘possessed souls’ tops with Darwin, Einstein ( for erring matter is energy and consequently made another bunch of fools search for dark matter/energy), Hawkins, Dawkins and Atkins etc.
10:00-25:00 very interesting especially on transgernderism
What is the name of the opening hymn?
I vow to thee my country
I love how someone's smoking 😂😂😂
I haven't read his book, but what he said here about evolution I believe is a mistake. Of course, something cannot give what it does not have to give, but the theory of evolution holds that the entirety of, say, the eye comes from many different simple cause, which together end in an eye. The effect does pre-exist in the cause, as St. Thomas Aquinas said, but in multiple causes.
Now, Fr. Ripperger can argue these causes do not have sight, but St. Thomas Aquinas also says that the whole depends on its parts. Now, none of the parts of the eye is an eye, but each part is a kind of cause of the whole. The same point could be made regarding the fact that DNA in itself does not have the ability to see, but it is a cause of the eye. So, evolution is not against the principle at all.
With all due respect, I think you should speak with an evolutionary biologist on this. There are plenty of Thomists who accept evolution.
owchywawa if you read Michael Behe's book the black box where he describes the principle of irreducible complexity, evolution has many many flaws. Especially in macro evolution
Bucky Haberthy I've read it, and it doesn't hold water.
There is no causal connection between natural selection and genetic mutation and eyes or sight. Natural selection is not a creative process, it is a process of elimination. It does not have the power to produce body parts. Mutation cannot produce body parts, it is only a change in material that already exists. DNA is a material cause for body parts because it is information and design. That the whole of something depends on its parts does not make for an argument for evolution. A part of a body is not a creative process. When we say that one thing caused another thing in the sense of making it come into existence, we are suggesting creative power. And we ought to consider whether the supposed cause really have the necessary power to create something. Effects have corresponding causes. But natural selection and genetic mutation do not have the power necessary to produce the results that scientists attribute to them. That there are Thomists who believe in evolution theory just shows that they go along with the false, naturalistic, mechanistic idea of causality that the theory of evolution represents and they don't think about corresponding causes and effects and what power is necessary to produce a given effect.
Actually, there are very good reasons for disbelieving evolution's explanations for how complicated things such as eyes came to be. If you are really interested, you can go to the Discovery Institute, which was formed by a number of scientists who were unhappy with the Evolutionary Theory. There you will be amazed by how little Evolution can function as a real answer to these very questions.
"Thomists who accept evolution" is an oxymoron.
With all due respect, Father Ripperger's philosophy of nature seems superficially correct but weak on a number of levels. He doesn't seem to employ quite strictly enough the principle of proportionate causality. It has been proposed numerous times for instance that DNA itself may have the general potency to bring about all of the forms of life as they exist. This is in no way a problem for thomism. It is no more problem for Thomism than say the fact hydrogen and oxygen may generate water.
Fr. Ripperger's point is that thomism *precedes* empirical analysis. And that's a big deal for theologians. Science doesn't build theology, rather philosophy is applied to theology and _then_ it is decided on that basis which parts of mainstream science are valid in the eyes of the Holy Catholic Church.
It only makes water with an outside catalyst, it won't happen without an outside force
“It has been proposed” by the devil. Evolution is false. There are stories and no evidence. That’s not science. If evolution were true there would be actual evidence rather than cartoon pictures and 3D renderings of imagined realities. There are some fossils found that are either human, non-human, or a forgery. There are no fossils of “missing links.” The Earth is about 6027 years old. The Freemasons (satanists/luciferians) state the year is either 6023 or 6027. Christ is real. He is the King of kings. He is God the Son. Dinosaurs died in The worldwide flood as described in Genesis. We have millions of dinosaur bones, yet no evolutionary “missing links” in dinosaurs or apes or anything else. This should strike you as odd if you believe in evolution and the false “old earth hypothesis.” The Earth was created by the Almighty Triune, Most Holy Trinity aka God thousands of years ago, not billions of years ago. God bless you. ♥️