Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS - Funny Umpire
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2016
- Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS- Funny Umpire
FOR FAST , FREE AND CHEAP GAMES VISIT: www.g2a.com/r/user-587099ca9c856
Worst Decisions By DRS In Cricket History - Best Fails Of DRS- Funny Umpire
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you Like The Video then SubScribe To My Channel
● CRIC CLEVERS●
●As We Know That The Cricket Is Very Intresting Game. But Our New Generation Is Busy With Their Phones.
So We Are Tying To Reach Everyone To Make Cricket More Intresting Game By Showing Cricket Videos.
Everyone Can Learn Intresting Cricket Skills By Watching Our Videos.
●If you (owners) Found Any Of Clip Of You In This Video And You want to remove That Clip From This Video,
please CONTACT US DIRECTLY Before Taking Any Action. We will Respectfully Remove it.
●HARD WORK IS KEY TO SUCCESS.
●CONTENT DISCLAIMER!?
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I must state that in NO way, shape or form am I intending to infringe rights of the copyright holder. Content used is strictly for research/reviewing purposes and to help educate. All under the Fair Use law.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#cricket drs in real life,
#cricket drs errors,
#cricket drs system,
#drs cricket controversy,
#cricket drs
#batsman crying
#India vs England 2016
#DRS comes to Parthiv Patel's rescue during the Mohali Test
#drs cricket controversy,
#drs cricket india,
#drs cricket rule,
#drs system in cricket,
#cricket drs errors,
#drs cricket,
#drs cricket funny
#India vs England 2016 day 3
#HD
#best fail compilation 2016
#LATEST
#DRS Spoils Parthiv's Comeback
#DRS LOSES
#india against drs
#why drs
#Worst Decisions By DRS
#Cricket History
#Best Fails Of DRS HD
#drs cricket funny
#funny umpire moments in cricket,
#funny umpires in cricket,
#funny umpire moments,
#funny umpire decision in cricket,
#funny umpire videos,
#funny umpire strike out,
#funny umpire decision,
#funny umpire dance,
#funny umpire billy bowden,
#funny umpire billy,
#funny umpire,
#funny umpire in cricket,
#funny umpire de,
#baseball umpire funny,
#umpire billy bowden funny moments,
#funny baseball umpire moments,
#funny umpire cricket,
#funny umpire calls,
#funny umpire compilation,
#funny umpire calling strikes,
#funny umpire commercial,
#cricket umpire funny moments,
#umpire funny strikeout call,
#funny umpire ejections,
funny umpire fails,
#funny football umpire,
#funny little league umpire,
#funny mlb umpire,
#funny umpire strike out calls,
#funny umpire strike calls,
#funny umpire strike,
#funny tennis umpire
===================================================
Thanks For Watching Subscribe For More - กีฬา
DRS and SriLanka.. Better love story than twilight
Lot of lovers for sri lanka
Bada yarana lagata hai.
India and the icc... Better love story than titanic
Any story is better love story than twilight 🤣
Shut up
Steve Bucknor is retired but his teaching lives. #legend 🙏
😂
😁😁😁😁😁😁
Sachin loved him the most !
😂😂😂😂
Comment of the Thread 😂🤣😂🤣
9:01 i still remember Sachin's gesture.
If Tony Greig is defending Australia, you know it's legit 🤣
despite being an Englishman
@@kartikrajsingh1895 South African
@@RobNoles79 I thought he was English
@@kartikrajsingh1895 nope, South African who played for England when South Africa were banned from sport
@@RobNoles79 He isn't South African when both his parents are Scottish and he claims he is.
4:12 bowler = howzat
DRS = In the air gone for six 🤣🤣
lol
Lolololol
🤣🤣
😂
😂😂😂
Ea sports 2007 had better Technology than this 😂😂😂
🤣🤣
Most of their technology is for charging your credit card every time your player gets a haircut.
It's in the game.
😂
@@QuasiELVIS I got everything free smh. ......
4:05 LMAO that is one of the most rigged drs ive ever seen
The second clip was back when the DRS model didn't account for gravity 🙃
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
It's keep going up😂
@@sujithlasantha6153 it was a hand grenade .
@@Eleventhearlofmars expected as the bowler was a Pakistani
Legends say if the pad wasn't there that ball would have gone for a 6
4:16 red ball gives you wings
Lol😂🤣
Nice one.
😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Underrated comment
“Pitched outside leg for me...”
Is he blind or just bias.
@R S No he didn't. The other commentator corrected him.
Charu Sharma is the commentator. He’s surely blind 🤣😎. That for me is bias. He even says it isn’t hitting 50 percent. No wonder they no longer bring him to commentate. He had a very average career as a commentator.
i still dont get that DRS like fuck its out...wtf and its pitching perfectly inline.
he's blind ;-)
@@cosmicgibber8142 he was right. 52% of the ball was missing the middle of the stumps. He was saying that the rule was whether 50% of the ball was hitting the middle of the stump, which it wasn't, just under. He didn't agree with the rule, he just said what it was. I'm with Tony Greig in saying I disagree with the rule, but that's what the rule was and thats all the other guy ways saying
1:20 thank god under today’s rules that would be out
Lol I just love Tony's reaction. This has also reminded me just how much I miss Tony's commentary.
Definitely. He’s much missed.
Steve Bucknor is the reason DRS was introduced 🤣
@@jahno7154 excuse me how is that racist? He was saying that the umpire was bad, nothing about his race.
hahaha exactly 😂
@@jahno7154 man you threw teh race card quicker than bucknor used to give his incorrect calls.
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
@@jahno7154 Actually racist are you here
"outside leg for me" 😂😂😂😂
🤪🤪🤪
Why is it that everytime the decision went SL's favor? 😂
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
BWAHHHHHAHAHAHAA
Because these clips have been selected by an indian channel
@@bp-lx7lf all are drs mistake so it is srilanka....anyway nice way to talk about india even if it's their fault
Because earlier it was 50% ball must be hit stump
azmal's hawk eye projection is to the moon😂
Original decision: Not Out
Wickets (hitting): Umpires Call
What????
Same i was shocked
The was just out of the stump so umpires call.......
out hota hai
@@AbhayKumar-vs6fy umpire call not out so it not out stick to descious
That ball is outside off.as the cricket rule outside off is the decision of the umpire
DRS- Don't Review Sri Lanka🤣🤣😂😂
Edit- Thanks for 3.6k likes it's my first comment with 3.6k+ likes
@@cricketfan9611 dharmasena review system
Shutup
@@sbshdhvsbdb5279 What kind of bullshit is that
Woohoo
@Team Selector Ohh sorry boy,i think u have been seeing cricket only from this world cup ,just go and see Indias matches under dhonis captaincy,AND JUST DON'T PISS OFF COMMENTS
5:50 I'm with you on this one, i will give him out
Really nice to hear that lol, i wish the 3rd umpire also said that
Steve Bucknors soul in DRS 😂
I'll never forget Nigel Llong's infamous "it could be anything" when hot spot picked up a clear spot on Lyon's bat and gave him not out. The commentator was like; "what else could it be that made the spot, a bumble bee?",gotta be the worst ever decision by a third umpire
Yeah, I do think that umpire's need to be provided with more specific rules to follow than they seem to have been. We've seen countless decisions where RTS/UltraEdge shows a spike as the ball passes the bat and that is assumed to be an edge, yet we know for a fact that other sources of sound can cause similar spikes because we've seen them when the ball is clearly not hitting the bat. On that basis, any mark on HotSpot in the right place should be assumed to also be the result of an edge. I get the impression that Llong was saying that it could have just been a reflection rather than an actual mark, which we do see on HotSpot quite often, but they always look distinctly different to actual marks on the bat and, in that case, it was clearly a mark on the bat. I strongly suspect that, had Lyon been given out on the field and reviewed himself, that same mark would have been considered evidence of the correct decision. I think Llong erred too much in favour of the onfield umpire.
4:16 sec rip cricket 😂😂😂
Man, Anil Kumble straight up went for review 😂. I guess either he was captain or well, nobody really questioned him in whole team.... Badass 😎
He was captain at that time
Just like Brock 😎💪
He did that cuz he knew it was OUT. DRS was like aaj kuch tufani karte hain
Impact over 2m
I thought this list was about general bad umpiring decisions but turns out it's about a love story between Sri Lankan cricket team and the DRS
4:16 rip DRS
Why on the planet are Sri Lankan batsmen getting benefit of these decisions every time........may be because DRS is Dharmasena review system😳
amrit padda because it's Punjabi propaganda
amrit padda hahahaha
Hahaha nailed
Hei its not right damn
amrit padda because srilanka people only have kind heart
The only thing with the Wagner delivery was that in the event of a full toss, the Hawkeye assumes the ball travels in the same direction of impact and doesn't take into account the reverse swing he got. That was the reason it was very unfortunate Wagner didn't get that wicket because with the reverse swing on that, the ball was crashing middle of leg stump.
no, DRS clearly got it right - it hit the back pad in line with off stump, was moving away from the stumps
@@jbmuggins8815no it didn’t - watch the delivery again and you’ll see the reverse swing towards the end of it. No way the ball misses the stumps
and you can actually see when it starts swinging in, the trajectory hawkeye has it going in starts to deviate from the actual path of the ball. You can see where hawkeye thinks it hit is pad is slightly to the right of where it actually hit his pad.
Actually even the freeze frame @5:20, shows ball is on mid stump but tracker puts it on off stumps, two inches wider than were it is. Same was done on the Tendulkar decision that won them the match, Ball line was clearly changed by hawkeye. That one seemed less of a coincidence
The issue is that even with the ball straightening slightly, Wagner has bowled it from an extremely wide angle, meaning that it would have to swing way more than it did to hit. It's a bit of an optical illusion because it hit him in front of off stump, but I'd agree with DRS here that it's most likely missing given the point of release.
@9:00 look at Sachin Tendulkar so angry but so accurate.
Outside leg seriously how much pot did that first Sri Lankan commentator smoke.
Anthony Anlezark I know it's hilarious
he was Indian commentator charu sharma.
+sports Singh he is not charu
+sports Singh its waqar
Charu sharma...leg ko pakkad k baittha hai..
4:12 the ball suddenly got wings
Ball was dipped in Redbull?
True 😂
These balls are soaked in Jack Daniel whiskey..
The only thing saving the batsman was that he was way way in front of the crease, giving ball the time and distance to bounce.
@@arachnid83 *Red* bull
Get it?
That was the time DRS in very early stages and not matured enough
Yes
The tech is a lot better now but still not faultless, that's why Umpire's Call exists now but is a lot more of a smaller margin.
Poor Ajmal and DRS 😂
Even DRS didn't miss out on trolling Ajmal 😂
So not gonna talk about the review for Sachin wicket in 2011 world cup which showed different ball than the appealed one?
I think the title should be changed to Best DRS fails against Sri Lanka😂😂
@@alisubooh bhai logo se kya lag raha hai?? Haan bhai Columban hi hun😂😂
😂😂😂
Lol
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
LMAO, DRS shows Ajmal's ball bouncing like it's an aussie pitch.
When your favourite team is playing and you are sitting on DRS 😁
Sri Lankans hacking the DRS System😂🤣😂
Bruh we ain’t doing anything don’t blame us
@@photoballa Just fun
Icc=indian cricket council)
Lol typical indians 🤣🤣
@@mohaimenulislam8782 typical Pakistani 😂😂😆
DRS cannot predict the reverse swing of the ball.
can you, johnny portugee ?
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
Lol it was a conventional swing
Well said the late Tony Greig and this was something the late Shane Kieth Warne was wanting to get fixed in the game.
If it's going on to hit the stumps after the DRS and everything is alright in the replay the decision has to be out and not umpires call.
'Outside leg for me'😂😂😂
4:16 wtf the ball is going to the moon 🌝
Yeah man
5:44 That's good to see 😂
Though the decision made me irritated, still I'm happy as it didn't favour Australia
You mad lmao?
@@Tom-js3iz may be
4:20 DRS has crossed its level.
I was pissing myself when the commentator said he thought it was pitching outside leg on the first one when it pitched almost on middle😂
RIP Tony Greig. What a great cricket brain he had, cutting through the DRS bullshit !
Not a good enough brain to understand how DRS worked at the time, it seems. I can't believe that professional commentators didn't make the effort to actually learn. I suspect that they were all briefed but maybe it was inadequate or maybe some just didn't listen properly. Interestingly, the protocol was later changed to what Tony was suggesting, but ball-tracking technology has also improved since then, so the actual margin of error in the predicted path is smaller nowadays.
The number of times "Hawkeye" has the ball doing the craziest things after it hits the pads is crazy! It projects it bending all over the shop.
1:35 umpires call really 😠😡😡😠
1:48 It hit the stumps!
early drs rules. 50% had to hit the middle of the stump
@@jhoeshua Thanks
8:33 what the hell is that
Even I didn’t understand. Did they not allowed ball tracking because the ball hit pads for more than 2 m away from stumps ?
The technology was basic back then
@@pulkit1995 yup back then DRS was only used if the ball hit the pads less than or equal to 2m
@@pulkit1995 Ball tracking wasn't required since the batsman made genuine attempt to play the ball and the impact was outside off. Impact should be in line.
@@akshatagrawal3795 bro impact in line rule was introduced just 2 years ago
I love seeing these. They're all from a period when DRS was being introduced and tuned from a technology standpoint, but just as importantly, as a set of managed rules.
It's still happening to a much lesser degree, more akin to every other set of review rules, and I think is an enhancement to the game today.
But man, some of these teething troubles... fascinating. And it's interesting to see that the troubles in these clips are centred in a range of areas. That first one with Tony Grieg is so clunky. I mean, you can see they've chosen to display the path predictor with more precision than the rules at the time allowed for consideration. That's just asking for confusion, and people at the time thought it might fly. Grieggy didn't seem to get it, so it was always going to be hard for viewers. I think nowadays, most in the cricket community are comfortable accepting a higher degree of precision from the tech, and that's fixed a lot. But you can see from the second clip why people didn't totally trust it early doors. The exaggerated bounce in the predictor in that one seems to suggest an error of some kind. That one truly is a terrible call.
The Wagner/Llong one doesn't belong here on the merits. The tech is totally correct. The confusion with the commentators (and the field umpire) comes from a perception error, I think, mostly caused by Wagner's wide release point, and the comments are just misattributed to DRS.
The lack of sound makes it hard to tell what's going on in the last one. But yeah, looks like some iffy tech there indeed. No doubt the players and commentators are only 90% familiar with the rules, so are generating additional confusion too. Probably good I can't hear it.
This needs a yearly release!. There was some absolute gems of wtf's with DRS the last 12 months. It seems physics no longer apply.
2nd one perfectly maintained Newton's 3rd law😂😂😂
Gravity was like; am I a joke to u?
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
The only reason i clicked because i wanted to see crying ricky pointing!
I also
He made his opponents cry more often when he went out to bat.
You double parked your rickshaw
@MAGIC ㄆ SOUMIK cry cry 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ponting made India cry in 2003 WC Final 😂
Very nice DRS system 👌
Weirdly, all these DRS mistakes were happening with SL being favourable to all those decisions. 🤷🏻♂️
slanka will miss drs in the upcoming series. 😂
🤣
Trust me i wonder the same as SL
That saeed Ajmal one is the worst because it’s a dead Sharjah pitch and the Wellington would be proud of that bounce and it’s a spinner bowler it would be crashing into lower middle stump
Going under mate surely??
I want that much of confidence in my life which the SL batsman had while reviewing against New Zealand appeal !
2:43 If It's clipping the wickets, out. End of story.
Any 1 remember use of DRS of sechin Tendulkar against Pakistan in world cup
The 1st one was like a Heart Attack to me.
Same here bro
Same
I know. crazy! good they fixed it
th-cam.com/video/ikPgGNYr6xY/w-d-xo.html
@@jamesiyer4937 yes now drs is not that bad
This is fault in graphics. Not in decision 😂
Facts that it happened only with Sri Lanka 😂😂....
Something's cooking
Amazing 👌
@0:49 outside leg for me! Are you kidding me
Stupid hai sale...
Okay everyone is confused
Outside leg was meant for a right handed batsmen
The commentator in the first video had doubts about what an off stump and leg stump are
Ya
It was a lefty so they just forgot a couple times
The terminology isn't so clear cut with left handers. For example a left arm bowler technically can't be an off spinner or a leg spinner, they're orthodox or unorthodox/Chinaman/something-else-racist
@@QuasiELVIS waaaah racism
@@SFTaYZa I wasn't crying or complaining? Calling an unusual delivery a chinaman is pretty racist though.
ONCE in a Lifetime Talent on The Pitch...Funny , Engaging , Intelligent , Superfluous Sportsman , Legendary Aussie . The Greatest Leg Spinner to ever play The Game. A Corona with Warnie at Chasers in Sth Yarra will never be forgotten..
In this time of sorrow, may the outpouring of love, support, and cherished memories provide some measure of comfort for the Warne Family around The World.
Shane meant a lot , to a lot of people. His was a truly beautiful soul.
DJ MC Mark Sharp. Sydney , Australia's , No.1 Party Maestro.
Oh yeah 🤣🤙
I'm a Canadian who got into cricket during the 2015 CWC and must say I've never like the 50% of the ball hitting the stump rule. It should be less like 25% of the ball must be touching. If he hadn't hit the batsmans pad it would have been bales off...
they accually have done that now. Not sure exactly but its pretty close to 25% overall rather than 50% of the ball hitting 50% of the stump like in the first video. Honestly they could have gone further but steps in the right direction.
Cody Schubert the reason its 50% of the ball is to counter a possible chance of error in the ball tracking
waganaut not true at all. its still 50% of the ball. but its not from the middle of the stump like in this video
If there is possible error in the ball tracking, then they should use the 50% rule even if the umpire has given them out.
Why the 50% rule really exists is to stop the game becoming a technological game about margins, and whether or not 0.5% or 1% of the ball hits the stumps.
Thanks everyone for the replies - I never really thought about it in the way that it's a bit too nit picky. There's always been umpires whom have tried to the best of their abilities make the correct call, I guess having "to much" technology would defeat the purpose of those umpires duties. Thanks again.
Isn’t umpires decision 50/50. That first one was like 80/20
When it is umpires call, they check whether half or more of the ball is hitting. In first one, it was like 48% was hitting, 52% of the ball wasn't. The center of the wicked was just right of the center of the seam. A very close decision.
I don't like umpire call either, but according to the law it was not out. But there should be some changes made to the rules. That was not out. But totally unfair to the bowler, so maybe they should introduce that Umpires call should only be valid if 20% of the ball is hitting the wicked. Cause more than 50% is very unfair to the bowler.
The bowler can easily knock out the baills, even if 10% of the ball hits the wicket. This gives batsman and unfair advantage
@@masoodjalal1152 That's not what the video and the commentator is arguing though. They are arguing that the ball is hitting the stumps by more than half. About 80% of the ball was hitting the stumps because the stump includes the whole thing, not just the middle. The ball was hitting the middle of off stump so therefore more than half of the ball was hitting the stump. The majority of the outside 52% is still hitting the stump, just not in the middle.
@@nothinnonthing6951 Excellent explanation👏
@@nothinnonthing6951 The thing is now rules have changed. Earlier only the middle line of the stump is taken for calculating the percentage of ball hitting the stumps, So the decision was correct in the first one according to law.Now the edge of the stump is taken after these incidents.Now people are argiung to declare if ball hits the stumps in ball tracking. In few years we might see a rule change again if ICC believe current technologies.
@@KiranKartheep true
Wow really entertaining
Part of the ball was hitting Middle Stump - Tony Grieg always Hilarious
Ricky ponting in thumbnail is hilarious, looks like he is having regret of his lifetime.
😂
For a split second I thought it was Toby green 😂
The system is improving. At least technology is helping the sport and giving the teams a chance to review decisions. It will keep improving.
Doesn’t help when the skipper is uncertain about reviewing, good to see his support fr his Men. I miss Tony, Richie and Max. 🇦🇺👍
Three of those were spot on. The first was stiff, but the two spinners hit the pad so far down the pitch that they really couldn't be given, and the Wagner delivery was a no ball, his foot touched the return crease.
Title- in cricket history.
Video- in sri lankan matches.
Clark nai go review lia tha woh clear out tha
😂
4:16 seriously 😂😂😂 I was like oh god
Epic lol
The ones given against Australia are hilarious. The rest are just plain wrong! LOL
Srilanka & DRS untold story 😂
Yes
www.cricketudrs.com/
All the opposition team was srilanka 😂😂 DRS all were favoured in them
That's called dharmasena review system
Because most umpire come from sL
@@mirfazil5957 No that's called Dhoni review system
@@amansethi7453 Then it would have Favoured India Everytime.
@@mirfazil5957 ... Ha ha ha... He he he... Well said bro
Nice 👍
6:51 Meanwhile swing : honey i m not even there
I m a hallucination
The majority of these actually show the awesomeness of DRS.. no way anybody would've doubted the decisions by umpires on most of these incidents without DRS showing us. But the first and last ones were the exception, where the rules were so bad that they needed just a few decisions to realize how bad they were.
Wdym bruh the second one was like Drs hadn't turn on gravity and was going for six lmao bro that was clear as day
He is indian so ofc he would say that
Bro straight up ignored the second one lol
@4:39 He knew very well what Srilankan DRS is capable of :D
UAE
Absolutely shocking decisions. How is that first one not out 🤣🤣
Umpire gave it not out, so it’s umpire’s call.
DRS was not as accurate as it is now. So the ball basically had to be entirely hitting the stumps.
The change to half a ball came in later when the tech improved
5:37 shows that there needs to be an umpires call for balls just missing the stumps as well as for balls just hitting the stumps.
That is not wrong.. I am a surveying sciences student and i know abouth the optical instrumental errors. DRS is constructed mainly by a 3D environment created by a computer algorithm based on several optical camera inputs. So in cases like these, they of course tend to have errors. So the creators define certain tolerance levels for the decisions given by the system. For example the hawkeye flight of the ball. It might not be the path that the ball actually had flown. That is the reason for that 50% ball outside is given Umpire's Call. Now the rules have changed to the edge of the stump instead of the middle of the stump. So that is also good. TH-camrs please be well informed before posting. I am also an honest Sri Lankan. Good Luck all..❤️
Dilanka Kasun an honest Sri Lankan you say?
@@RtB68Yes. That is what made me comment on this.
Right that it can't be perfect, but I don't understand why to then rely on the on-field umpire's descision then? I mean their decision is ofc more imperfect than DRS
(I'm talking bout umpire's call)
DRS exists for fair cricket
Umpire's call and ball tracking : I'm gonna end this man's whole career.
In Wegner's case.... I think the ball tracking software was unable to track the entire trajectory... It just took the initial position of the ball and the position when ball hit the pad.... And from that, the software calculated that the ball will miss the stumps but that was not the case... Ball was definitely hitting the stump.
It's fine margins but I actually think that one is very feasible, Wagner delivered that from ridiculously wide in the crease + over the wicket and it hit him on leg stump, where ball was projected to end up was only like a ball width from where it struck despite that extreme angle cause it angled in a tiny bit at the end.
Pissed outside leg😅
With the new rules on ball tracking in DRS, the first one would have been given out.
Even with the old rules, it should've been out as more than 50% of ball is hitting stumps
Well the rules were that more than 50% of the ball had to be below the bails, and inside the black line on the stumps (middle of off/leg stump)
Now 50% of the ball still has to be below the bails, but the "black line" (where 50% of the ball has to be inside) is now the outside of off/leg stump.
I agree the first one has more than 70% of the ball hitting the stumps HOW IN NAME OF THE GAME IS THAT UMPIRES CALL? thanks goodness that has been changed from that test to the first test against Aus vs SA at the WACA.
Maxman013 DRS has got that wrong. It was swinging back and would of nearly hit middle. DRS cannot detect late swing.
Damn right
To put things in perspective on the last one between India and Sri Lanka - one of the "umpire's call" conditions for the review of an LBW decision was if the impact was 6ft or more from the wickets. As the impact was 7ft, the review didn't change the decision, even though it was plumb.
Isn't it 2.5 meters?
If u see in one of the side angles he was clearly within the limits to be given out
5:33 that was really close. Probably as close as you can possibly get. If the wind had just changed slightly he would have been out.
It seems to reversed.. just not enough too much much angle from that wide a release
This is a perfect example of why Broad and co wanted the whole "Umpire's call" thing to be completely reworked.
8:15 what is this?
Checking if impact is inside or outsidw the line of off stump
4:15 bounce?? Hahaha... That one would have bounced a bit then dipped at that pace...
5:10 Worst tracking.. Even impact point was read wrong lol, the impact marker moved with his leg.. And where is the swing??
The bounce was because of the trajectory I guess...
ur mom giey
Virat Kohli Fan drs doest work with reverse swing mayb
Yes sir i will agree...
Bounce
I think shoaib akhtar is bowling
I think the DRS system is more complicated than most PHd courses 😂😂😂😂
Ajmal be like : DRS stands for Dajjal Review System 🤣😂😂