Magna Carta 1215 vs 1297 What Changed (Marc Breaks it Down)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
![🔴 [TRỰC TIẾP] Tứ Xuyên (Trung Quốc) VS U20 Thái Lan | Cúp VTV9 - Bình Điền 2024 | JET STUDIO](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bguJ41PcW0c/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you Marc for taking the time to both research and share your findings. I never enjoyed history until about ten years ago. I’ve always enjoyed politics until I learned that’s it’s just a game played. Learning “government “ means to govern our minds I’ve decided to keep researching and learning, possibly take a degree in law. It’s always going to worth it, to be a member of their club and become like Robin Hood. It’s long overdue for wealth to be redistributed. I feel it’s my purpose to help as many people as possible.
Notice of the invocation of article 61. According to article 61, we all have a lawful obligation and duty to swear allegiance to the committee of the barrons.
British barons are not ‘English’ barons….be careful who you swear allegiance to!
England were the invading occupying force that brought their name of England to British regions they conquered….same with Britain and Great Britain, they might be similar, but they’re different jurisdictions and Great Britain is a type of trust territory or vessel. If you claim to be English, you’ll be putting yourself in the jurisdiction of the City of London and you’ll become a traitor to your nation.
Beware of this chap….I’ll say no more.
Did you not listen to him.
1215 was never passed in parliament. It was signed in a paddock. 1297 passed in a court. Article 61 was removed because it is a dictator law against the people.
You choose who you want to be your master... mine is the universe :)
I think the Statute of Marlborough 1267 deserves a mention. There were 29 chapters of which 4 are still in effect today. Theses are the oldest statutes in effect today.
And i have used one of them to get my car back after it was towed away to another county by the police.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Marlborough#:~:text=The%20Statute%20of%20Marlborough%20(52,in%20force%20as%20of%202024.
Thanks :) We are getting more and more relevant stuff :)
There is a fundamental difference between 1215 and 1297. In 1215 there wasn't a parliament.
The 1215 magna carta is a convention of the people and therefore is real and 1297 magna carta was made by a legal fiction that is parliament.
People say that 1215 magna carta was for the rich Barons and clergy , and not the common man.
Well who do you think was the members of parliament if not the barons, Earls, Dukes and the clergy.
Some people say that MC1215 was agreed to by King John under duress.
This is not true. John had lost in battle to the Barons, so had lost his claim to the throne. The Barons and church allowed John to carry on if he accepted magna carta. Magna carta 1215 is not statutory were as MC1297 is.
the distress act 1267 specifically ?
@@folkmoot36 Parliament was not involved with legislation under either 1215 or 1297... and yes 1297 is current statute law....
Thank you so much
Thank you again Marc for all your efforts to inform / educate/ help. Question if anyone can answer it, someone in court for speeding or parking offences, because they’re being accused do they still have the right to a jury, it’ll be interesting reading any answers.
Hi I live in Ireland because we have a constitution does that make the magna Carta of no use to the Irish . Ireland is very independent from the UK and they make really complicated to understand
have you any advice on what we can use
2:46 I tend to disagree there with the all caps and lower caps. The evidence has been found that is does matter.
Can you provide this evidence then?
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
DOG-LATIN Definition & Legal Meaning
Definition & Citations:
The Latin of illiterate persons; Latin words put together on the English grammatical system.
You probably know this/ I have been reasearching this for over 16 years and following other researchers over the years putting all the information together.
I even didn't go to court after 3 invites in 1991 for careless driving where if I went to court the judge would of fined me money to pay for the day he spent in court.
Legally, I don't have to go to court because of the wording MUST which is may.
I speak English and when I do busines, I speak in Corporate and contracts. Two worlds exist.
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel
Proper noun
Latin (plural Latins)
A surname from Middle English.
And the surname is always in all caps, where the christian name is in lower caps.
But if the full name is in a all caps, that is the PERSON = LUCIFER = CORPORATION.
I don't go to a bank and open a bank account and say my name is john DOE. I walk in and have to say my full name isn all caps. usually states all caps.
www.hsbc.co.uk/content/dam/hsbc/gb/pdf/accounts/basic-bank-account-app-form.pdf
Even at the end it says use all caps the full name.
If it not important, why state this?
@@leavemyrightsalone The all caps that we see has been shown to be American Sign Language, Refer to the Chicago styles manual 17th ed around page 666. All credit goes to the Justinian Deception youtube channel, Rom and Rohan. Its not even English so its fraud from the start, dog latin would have dashes (-) between words, government does not use dashes.
@@leavemyrightsalone Who would believe must and may can be synonyms but it is there even in mainstream dictionaries.
Do you do interviews where you cover this more clearly please. Really interested in this - in have the book but very old language.
We are working on a Constitutional course which will be completed in a few months hopefully, supported with evidence!
arrest the police who arrested us during covid😂
Cant just rubbish 1215 , no way !
Paper written documents is the beginning of AI
You cant change forever law especially when there is no english parlement to speak for the English people.
You have a grave misunderstanding of magna carta and the law
Prove him wrong then!
Show us the Evidence
In simple terms, why does 1297 take precedence? Surely, if it is custom that places magna carta above statute, and if custom is the established pattern of behaviour, then it is the original ritual of the common law agreement itself which really matters and not how this was recorded. I agree that the Barons procedure is useless and I believe it has became a cult of beurocracy. I believe that custom is procedural and based on actions, so documents themselves cannot represent customs because only individual members of society can form custom. Any change to the document can't alter the state of the original agreement, or the actions and the results of the actions taken in forming the agreement. I believe it would not matter if there was no Magna Carta so long as the agreement took place and people are aware of this.
The documents are records of the agreements or am I missing something?
it appears you don't know anything about man of flesh and blood
Explain?
@@tcrookes2803 man of flesh and blood don't contract with the state because they cant, you don't know much about sovereignty either
@@omviuvenitlalumina Thank you for your detailed explanation of well, nothing and your assumptions of my knowledge. You're a great orator for your cause!
@@tcrookes2803 same to your birth certificate
I know plenty about man of flesh and blood and know it has nothing to do with what goes on in courts :)
Rebut the presumption that you are "acting as" a person in commerce. Only persons are guilty of offenses and as we know statute law cannot lawfully be enforced without consent. They need us to communicate 'through' to contract with the 'person'.
Where is the order? show us the evidence you have no proof have you
Can we claim are money back.. been put on police Courses . Instead of points
Spending 32 miles an hour.
? ❤❤❤ Cheers zblwss43⁴