Tap to unmute

Simulating Particle Life

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ค. 2024
  • Particle Life is a fascinating simulation model that showcases emergent behavior arising from simple rules. Inspired by Jeffrey Ventrella's "Clusters" ( ventrella.com/Clusters ). This simulation resembles real-life organisms, demonstrating that emergent behavior doesn’t require complex processes.

ความคิดเห็น • 826

  • @Lacheln-YO
    @Lacheln-YO 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +719

    This shows that you don't need overly complex things to make something beautiful (and amusing to my single celled brain)

    • @practicemodebutton7559
      @practicemodebutton7559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      i like this comment, it gets a dollar sign emoji
      💲

    •  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      fr

    • @Lacheln-YO
      @Lacheln-YO 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@practicemodebutton7559 💲

    • @ianmoore5502
      @ianmoore5502 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fr twice in one comment section

    • @WhyIsJupiterInTheFridge
      @WhyIsJupiterInTheFridge 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@practicemodebutton7559also a satellite emoji
      🛰

  • @mr.dragon.purple9209
    @mr.dragon.purple9209 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +749

    Can you pls make a site where you can play with these things, and if you do, put it in the description and reply to this comment, telling you created it? I WANT TO PLAY WITH THESE THINGS SO BAD

    • @BoredYoshi
      @BoredYoshi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      from the looks of it, it would take a lot of computing power to run, so it's not likely many people would get as much use from it as he did

    • @holl7w
      @holl7w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

      ​@@BoredYoshi it runs on the GPU so not really

    • @BoredYoshi
      @BoredYoshi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@holl7w true

    • @Monst3erCube
      @Monst3erCube 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I AGREE BRO

    • @magshdz
      @magshdz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      He can make a smaller version

  • @informalchipmunk5775
    @informalchipmunk5775 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +513

    At some point, one of these structures will randomly be extremely stable and self replicating. (Maybe something with its outer wall which allows it to gather more of its kind).
    That would make the chaos go extinct....

    • @BenziLZK
      @BenziLZK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

      at most of the videos I can see some 'cells' as I would like to call it, eat other particles or cells and it become too big to it splits into 2 cells...
      Kinda like how cells division work but without the chromosomes bullshits lol

    • @chri-k
      @chri-k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      The problem with this is that it is _too_ easy for multiple of the same structure to form from nothing, meaning that there is very little material left for any of them to make clones out of without first cannibalising something ( since they all use unique particles )

    • @_marshP
      @_marshP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Unfortunately he didn't add any sort of particle creation system that the particles can access.

    • @laiton2
      @laiton2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Yeah i feel like i could see that in a more complex environment the material in the outer layer of the “cell” could be attracted to the center layer with a middle layer seperating it, so that if the availability of the materials is right it could form a stable loop of getting big then collapsing in on itself in such a way that it replicates

    • @paulkanja
      @paulkanja 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I think the complex "cells" emerging from this soup of particles and "evolving" to survive in the randomness and chaos is quite cool.

  • @DankePrime
    @DankePrime 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +258

    I love life simulations so much, dude. There were actual food chains, and a few of the simulations literally had multi-celled stuff. This kind of stuff is awesome.

    • @proton..
      @proton.. หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      :3

    • @solkun11
      @solkun11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      for real ^_^

    • @twitchy.mp3
      @twitchy.mp3 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      its a trippy thought but what if we’re all in the best life sim ever playing the same game because we’re all life sim lovers? 😅😅

  • @Q-werty30
    @Q-werty30 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    10:47 I love these guys. They look like they have umbrellas

    • @malechex611
      @malechex611 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      _Umbrellium qwertii_

    • @Q-werty30
      @Q-werty30 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@malechex611 :D

    • @The-random-idiots
      @The-random-idiots หลายเดือนก่อน

      I made my reply before seeing urs

  • @funnifunnifunni
    @funnifunnifunni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +179

    1:58 first eukaryotic cell
    3:44 cell walls form
    4:08 complex life (and separate species)
    5:26 many species (and racism)
    5:34 mitosis
    6:07 genuses start forming (similar species)
    8:51 defense mechanisms arise (the blue "prey" cells start deflecting the red "predator" cells)
    10:37 multicellular life emerges
    11:14 cell nuclei form
    12:52 filter feeders emerge
    14:16 dna-like structure emerge
    edit: how did this get over 15 likes in under a day
    edit 2: some guy made a reply criticizing this so heres a disclaimer: i am not a scientist i made this comment for fun do not take any of this as something accurately explaining this
    still dont have to be so salty about it tho
    also the like count has gone up times ten when i last edited

    • @proatplanes
      @proatplanes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you

    • @gamingtv4041
      @gamingtv4041 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dam bro

    • @Thioacetone1
      @Thioacetone1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      bro made an edit for 15 likes

    • @_charademon_
      @_charademon_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That filter feeders are something else entirely)

    • @c0dejjshizpostarchive624
      @c0dejjshizpostarchive624 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Although this is fun and all, I would like to remind everyone that everything in this comment is an egregious misrepresentation of these concepts. I don't believe that OP intended to pass this off as "real", but for those gullible enough, this is absolutely positively incorrect.

  • @atismoke
    @atismoke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +225

    really makes you think about sentience
    like, at what point do you go from mass to life? to brains? to concience?

    •  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      fr

    • @darkgobelin4439
      @darkgobelin4439 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I personnaly think that what makes us sentient is just the size of our brain, like at one point we became smarter that other animals and we gained concience and emotions to better understand, but we need to understand because we have concience.. idk if it's clear I tried my best to explain my thoughts...

    • @vindi167
      @vindi167 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darkgobelin4439 we know that, @junhongwu1882 is asking at which point consciousness starts

    • @PEIIIKA
      @PEIIIKA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      ​@@darkgobelin4439The size of our brain doesn't really affect our intelligence. Popular misunderstatement. Though, i don't really know about what makes us far more intelligent than any other animal. I might guess that it's the amount of neurons in our brain.

    • @ImSkippingClass2Play
      @ImSkippingClass2Play 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@PEIIIKA It's approximately the ratio of the brain-mass compared to body-mass that makes things intelligent

  • @BoneEaters
    @BoneEaters 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Saw the title and the thumbnail and the channel and I knew I was gonna see something good

    • @Blankoo3d
      @Blankoo3d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If only more content creators knew these basic secrets to luring in more viewers.

  • @demon_xd_
    @demon_xd_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    Many of these structures appear pretty stable, I think if this simulation had a way of making new particles out of existing ones, self-replication could be achieved

    • @ayathados6629
      @ayathados6629 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The simulation works a lot like a closed system, or a cave underground.
      What this needs for it to be more realistic is to have new elements constantly appearing (kinda like energy from the sun hitting the earth)

    • @funnifunnifunni
      @funnifunnifunni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      self replication was achieved, it just involved murder
      at one point the orange yellow and blue cells were wplit by the red and cyan cells creating two new cells, mitosis being acheived partially

    • @creature-zf8rs
      @creature-zf8rs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@funnifunnifunni mitosis kinda happens through and requires stimuli as seen in the simulation because without it they won't split

    • @c0dejjshizpostarchive624
      @c0dejjshizpostarchive624 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@creature-zf8rs It's less of mitosis, and more of forced cytokinesis, the cell is violently ripped in half by some external structure and particles are somewhat evenly dispersed between the daughters.

  • @dutch_and_dimes
    @dutch_and_dimes หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I can't imagine a better way of simulating and explaining real-world biology than this. The first part literally teaches you about genetic traits in a way that is so undeniably simple that even a 3rd grader could learn it

    • @maxave7448
      @maxave7448 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I like to think of this more of as quantum traits rather than genetic ones because the simulation defines simple rules of how different particles interact with each other, the entire simulation then arises from these simple rules

  • @robbiealderton1361
    @robbiealderton1361 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    One of the coolest videos I have ever seen highlighting emergent properties

  • @leniterfortis4832
    @leniterfortis4832 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    Some of those looked completely alive. Very interesting.

    • @ikosaheadrom
      @ikosaheadrom 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I wount say they are alive you are seing the equivalent of wind it moves it pushes stuff but its not alive

    • @leniterfortis4832
      @leniterfortis4832 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@ikosaheadrom *LOOKED* completely alive

    • @ikosaheadrom
      @ikosaheadrom 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@leniterfortis4832 for they didnt look alive more of just particals moving about, the main thing that makes things alive is the ability to reproduce and metabolism i didnt see any of that in the simulation, i just saw multiple mobile black hole

    • @leniterfortis4832
      @leniterfortis4832 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@ikosaheadrom You might be taking yourself too seriously.

    • @creature-zf8rs
      @creature-zf8rs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@ikosaheadrom man has never seen a microorganism

  • @MrBrineplays_
    @MrBrineplays_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Now I wanna see this with the atomic scale now. Protons, neutrons, electrons, or the quarks making them up, then watch them as they show the different properties of gravity, electromagnetic properties, charges, changes in state of matter (solid to liquid, liquid to gas, gas to liquid, liquid to solid, etc.), radioactivity, tranparecy, conductivity, malleability, and more. Imagine how big of a simulation you need just for those things that are surprisingly 99% empty

    • @elementgermanium
      @elementgermanium 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      To be fair, you’d need to know how quantum gravity works, and no one knows how quantum gravity works lol

    • @TurnipTheBee
      @TurnipTheBee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@elementgermaniumhere's the great thing about simulations though! You don't, you just need to know it's effects! This simulation you watched was simplified as hell, and CELLS formed!

    • @4984christian
      @4984christian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They can simulate a human organ I think on the molecular level. One of my prof told that in a lecture 10 years ago. But they had research computation clusters. I bet its even more achievable today.

    • @4984christian
      @4984christian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The question is: will life emerge by doing such a simulation.

    • @TurnipTheBee
      @TurnipTheBee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@4984christian It depends on what you mean by "life"- In a simulation like this, I've personally seen simple "creatures" that eventually get so unstable they split into 3+, but more complex ones have a hard time
      It would be AMAZING to one day see spontaneous generation with our OWN EYES, computer or not!

  • @bencressman6110
    @bencressman6110 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    These kinds of simulations always spark so many ideas! What if you introduced gravity, each particle being attracted to a point at the centre inversely proportional to distance. What if you introduced energy, which affected the max speed of the particles? What if you grouped the particles in the beginning rather than randomly dispersed them? What if what if what if. This was beautiful. Thanks for putting it together

    • @GerinoMorn
      @GerinoMorn หลายเดือนก่อน

      What I think can be a gamechanger is mixing colours and their "electronegativity"

    • @aezravito9717
      @aezravito9717 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Gravity is not a point in space, but how much a mass bends the space or pulls.
      This game is already a gravity-pulling type simulation, but what should happen is that as the mass grows bigger, its pull should be bigger. I think that's what you meant.

    • @bencressman6110
      @bencressman6110 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aezravito9717 I meant what I said. When you program a simulation like this you can represent elements of reality as selectively and abstractly as you want. The current simulation has no direct or accurate representations of real world physics or phenomenon. I used the word “gravity” only to convey the idea. I think the version of gravity you propose would be very computationally expensive, but also very cool. It would be great to see that with an enormous world.

  • @Otakutaru
    @Otakutaru 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    youtube's compression algorithm hates this man

  • @Gabriel-se6tj
    @Gabriel-se6tj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As conway's game of life you can never really seem to be able to estimate how many generations this simulation will have or if it will be stable, if a cell will grow indefinetly, etc. Super duper cool particle chaos.

  • @steve12622
    @steve12622 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This Simulation is beatiful, not gonna lie, yet a real cell is so much more complex then this, that its hard to comprehend.

  • @VictorTirreau
    @VictorTirreau 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Appreciate your attention to details! The foley sound effects add depth and professionalism to the video, loved it overall!

  • @fadingstarmc3867
    @fadingstarmc3867 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    love the animations and the background music in this one! another amazing upload

    •  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      fr

  • @georgesas7090
    @georgesas7090 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What I find fascinating is how consistent the process is. For the same set or rules you always get similar "creatures", which shows that although there is randomness in it, as a whole it is perfectly deterministic at a higher, macroscopical level.

  • @AndreuszVII
    @AndreuszVII 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    This actually might be the way that life started. The visualisation is great and you need to be more popular for what you are doing❤

    •  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      fr

    • @gregoryturk1275
      @gregoryturk1275 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya

    • @SRT850HP
      @SRT850HP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alah who Het universum maken

    • @pidx
      @pidx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@SRT850HP Nope

    • @SRT850HP
      @SRT850HP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pidx YOU MEAN THAT ALAH DIDN'T DO IT!!!!!

  • @toaster_2815
    @toaster_2815 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is amazing! I'd like to see it with way more colors, even if you can't tell the colors apart you might see a lot of different species emerge

    • @JourneyLT
      @JourneyLT 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I only think you'd see many more species if the colours weren't evenly mixed in with each other. If there was an uneven distribution it would be more likely that different species could emerge, and then engage in interspecific competition based on their attraction/repulsion properties.

  • @MunkisManimal
    @MunkisManimal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If you think about it, pretty much everything in the universe is a bunch a particles following strict rules, so this is perfect.

  • @EchoPrograms
    @EchoPrograms 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I made my own web implementation of particle life. I had to put the link in a community post on my channel as yt automatically deletes comments with links apparently. It's pretty fun to mess around with, but it isn't gpu accelerated so you can't have a massive amount of particles, the number varies on how good your cpu is.

  • @surashey3216
    @surashey3216 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When you think about it life is just particles of different types that like each other or hate. It's so simple, but so fascinating.

  • @andreibaciu7518
    @andreibaciu7518 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It would be interesting to see particles be able to change into other particles when certain conditions are met, such as 2 red particles changing into a green for instance, or after a set amount of time. Combining this with rules similar to Conway's game of life would prove insightful to seeing how homeostasis naturally emerges.

  • @YLLPal
    @YLLPal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You could possibly make a kind of molecular behaviour by giving them properties which come into effect when they are "bonded" to another particle. A bond would be defined as a certain level of force interaction between 2 particles for at least x seconds (1N over 0.5 seconds bonds them until it stops or drops to 0).
    Say when you have a structure made of reds and blues, it changes some attraction properties, or even adds some interaction properties with other pairings.

  • @rady7273
    @rady7273 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    this might be better than watching raindrops roll down the window

  • @jalapenoandbanana
    @jalapenoandbanana 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for making this video, this is one of the coolest things I've seen in a while

  • @len518
    @len518 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You could, if more than 20 particles are clumped together. Change their value so that the different colors form “covalent bonds” with other particles of that color within the clump (which would just be like some string like code so they can’t wander off)
    Then you get molecules and it can get a little more complicated. You could also have some structures which you know are useful like bonds which two poles be forms that can form easily. If you know it can form in real life due to reactions it should be allowed to make it form in the simulation. Life could get more complex that way

  • @mmaaauuuuiiiii
    @mmaaauuuuiiiii หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd be really curious to see how environmental pressures would impact the simulation. Like an area that changes attraction or changes a particle from one to another.

  • @JustVarun1350
    @JustVarun1350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    GREAT VIDEO!

  • @Givized13
    @Givized13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I need this as my phone and PC wallpaper, simulated in real time. So fun to watch!

  • @KaneyoriHK
    @KaneyoriHK 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    To note something; Every aspect of our world can be related to a clock. Certainly at its core, it's just a gear turning, but when you take so many simple things, and blend them together in various ways, the complexity compounds. Going from a simple mechanical motion to the telling of time. Life is no different. At the end of the day it is a basic chemical process which life starts, many of these come together to create something truly awe inspiring.

  • @modlich_303
    @modlich_303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    even with such simple ruleset it almost looks like life sometimes.
    Imagine how it would get after adding more complex rules, like bonds, or multi-layer movement (like what's already here, but the repel/attract rules change at higher distances. making things repel to a point, and further than that attract, or vice versa, btw. this is an actual quantum property)

  • @Fireheart318
    @Fireheart318 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the way the ones at 10:40 trail things behind them. So sci-fi like!

  • @Merlin0216
    @Merlin0216 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    With hundreds of different particle types and millions of particles and given the „correct“ matrix for their interactions with each other, with enough time and just by chance - some structure could form, that can collect other particles and can thus replicate itself - which would make it a cell. And with that, real simulated life could „evolve“ over time just in this simple simulation. That’s how life emerged in our reality, probably.

  • @Lakaka99
    @Lakaka99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could watch this simulation running for hours, specially with this nice soft music

  • @Skeffles
    @Skeffles 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing! I love seeing all the different 'creatures' that appear.

  • @appleseedgames6934
    @appleseedgames6934 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Theists just can't comprehend the beauty of life and this universe, it's just so incredible

  • @syntaxerorr
    @syntaxerorr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Really nice visualization, great music too.

  • @baptisteprevost6835
    @baptisteprevost6835 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, simply explained yet complex and beautiful. You could have add the force matrix you used for the different simulations.

  • @melonenlord2723
    @melonenlord2723 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tried to programm it myself and it looks so unbelievable cool with the right tweaking with the variables. Thanks for the vid with the explainations :)

  • @AppleForTwo
    @AppleForTwo หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can watch this all day, it’s so cool to see the cell-like formations and what they do :)

  • @robkol2599
    @robkol2599 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This channel is so underrated

  • @phoomsgamingvid8943
    @phoomsgamingvid8943 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video is underrated. It deserves more views

  • @gamingtv4041
    @gamingtv4041 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    5:19 i love this

    • @bluestone-gamingbg3498
      @bluestone-gamingbg3498 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The creature on the bottom left literally exploded from eating too much

    • @Smiley_404
      @Smiley_404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bluestone-gamingbg3498it was more like "reproduction" notice the parts formed 2 other of itself, that's similar to how some real cells reproduce.

    • @c0dejjshizpostarchive624
      @c0dejjshizpostarchive624 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Smiley_404 It seems like the "cell" itself was barely holding itself together, but due to the intense charge of the "membrane" attracting to the "nucleus" (via the bridging orange particles that attract both the "membrane" and "nucleus), it remained stable. Once the "cell" got a hold of more cyan particles (those that make up the "nucleus") the force overwhelmed that of the "membrane" and it violently exploded. From this, the "membrane" and "bridge" particles formed new, smaller "cells", which quickly picked up a "nucleus" of a few cyan particles.
      This system is unbelievably impressive, notice how the daughters (terminating the use of quotation marks for convenience) without a nucleus of cyan particles form far more fluid structures, as the nucleus was a necessity for a proper membrane to form. Speaking of the membrane, the membrane appears perfectly formed to allow for fission of the cell. At large sizes (when the cell would want to divide), it forms slits that easily allow cyan particles into the nucleus, until the force overpowers the membrane and the cell divides.
      The life cycle of this structure of particles works specifically to grow in size, until it is too large, then divide. This, however, is similar to a cell being struck by an external structure that forcefully divides it. The major difference here is how the cell itself works to allow for this.
      The only issue with this cell is its inability to defend itself, despite how impressive its abilities of fission are, most or all of the offspring die before maturity (in which it divides).

  • @Otakutaru
    @Otakutaru 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    the fact that you skewed the laws of physics by not abiding to the reaction force is a no go for me. It still looks amazinng and feels alive

    • @deathhog
      @deathhog หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right?
      There were so many cases of perpetual motion machines that made me annoyed.
      However, as a rough approximation of what unicellular life behaves, it still does an okay job.
      In reality, we have positive, neutral, or negative charges, and that's really all we get to play with. Ah well. At least it is pretty.

  • @sansmemesarentfunny3030
    @sansmemesarentfunny3030 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You should add “chemistry” when when a particle gets close enough to another they can change into different particles not do anything or have only one particle change

  • @spoopy1322
    @spoopy1322 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is so awesome and interesting!

  • @Alexander-jh4ek
    @Alexander-jh4ek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is going into my favorites playlist

  • @user-qv4zw8ue2f
    @user-qv4zw8ue2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its really cool how simple things can emulate life.

  • @bananapalito
    @bananapalito 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Imagine a bullet hell game that you need to avoid those particles
    It would be so cool

    • @borggeddude
      @borggeddude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ah sweet
      running from a perpetually exploding shrapnel bomb that ricochets all over the place

    • @ISAAC_69000
      @ISAAC_69000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Intense Touhou gameplay💀💀💀

  • @Galaxzier
    @Galaxzier 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This reminds me of the hypothesis of fine-tuned universe. According to this hypothesis, the values of all physical constants are so finely matched that even the slightest deviation would lead to the impossibility of the existence not only of life, but also of fundamental structures such as quarks and atom

    • @alexanderthemidI
      @alexanderthemidI 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We can't really prove that though. Even if the universe chose a different preset, you know what they say; life finds a way, I guess.

    • @Blankoo3d
      @Blankoo3d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@alexanderthemidIIt has been proved, well sort of... No tangible research has been done on it but through equations of physics any physicist can tell that if the constants in our reality were slightly different nothing would exist... It's like knowing that if you cut off the base of a cup you can never fill it with water. Everything is just perfectly tuned... perfectly.

    • @lixun7390
      @lixun7390 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Blankoo3di agree with that. But I also have a question is that if all contants are increased 1% in perfect ratio, would the universe will work? (And it's the "interactions of these constants" that shape the world)

    • @lixun7390
      @lixun7390 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@alexanderthemidI the problem with "life finds a way" into relation with the fundamental presets is that - they are constants, which mean since the beginning of this universe they have been the same, so it doesn't make sense for the universe to do try and error until they find the perfect values.

    • @alexanderthemidI
      @alexanderthemidI 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lixun7390 There is literally nothing saying there can't be multiple universes that may have different laws of physics, and we happened to be in the one that supports this kind of life.

  • @twitchy.mp3
    @twitchy.mp3 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I hate that when i try to share this amazing simulation my father simply cant fathom any of it he just says “I dont know what Im looking at”
    Anyways, thank you OP for sharing this wonderful system this is very eye opening and a fun reminder of our beginnings

  • @matanvinkler71
    @matanvinkler71 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is one of the most beautiful things I've seen

  • @ryan___ryan2711
    @ryan___ryan2711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've absolutely thought about a particle simulator as a videogame. Looks like an awesome start

  • @seansimons1257
    @seansimons1257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is bizarrely beautiful

  • @KingBanjo1217
    @KingBanjo1217 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Conway been real quiet since this dropped.

  • @gregoryturk1275
    @gregoryturk1275 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool video please make more videos like this

  • @krzkrzy
    @krzkrzy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I noticed that there are many shots where cells tend to travel from left to right. I wonder if there's a bias in phisics engine that favours that direction, or it is an intended feature, a background gradient. But still, nothing that makes it less amazing.

  • @PaxRT87
    @PaxRT87 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is incredible. I am thinking of additional rules. Perhaps if two certain unlike particles meet, they turn into different particles, or maybe just one does.
    Perhaps some particles lose or gain attraction forces as they touch other like particles.

  • @thomblueart8448
    @thomblueart8448 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This just makes you appreciate the complexity of life so much more!😊

  • @beautifulmystic2799
    @beautifulmystic2799 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro this is so cool there were so many cool looking ones

  • @teacupanimates
    @teacupanimates 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i was using a nice implementation of particle life, i forgot the name of the guy who made it but the nice thing about it is it has a matrix that is editable that controls the forces of attraction and repulsion between the different particles, and i saw huge cells that would have mitosis, some had snake like structures, some would cluster into big groups to make multicellular things, if you tinker a little with it you can get surprisingly life like things from it.

  • @Slugcat317
    @Slugcat317 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i clicked cus the thumbnail looked like my obsidian vault 💀

  • @flammea_
    @flammea_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fun observation: Almost all particle clusters or "organisms" end up moving from left to right in every simulation

  • @pathetacy
    @pathetacy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    this is why i love evolution simulations

  • @gabrielyoung4634
    @gabrielyoung4634 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could watch particle life simulations for hours

  • @yodef6828
    @yodef6828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think one of the limiting factors of this simulation is the lack of collisions. As you have said, you have added a repulsion for when two particles get too close. Yet, many times, once there is a big enough number of particles attracting each other they seem to reach a sort of "size limit" from which the addition of particles will only make the mass of particles denser and not bigger. This, seems to greatly limit the size and complexity of the "organisms" that emerge. Probably the addition of actual collisions would suppose a significant strain on the GPU but I think it might pay off. Thank you so much. Loved the video.

  • @user-vl6vj2nu1s
    @user-vl6vj2nu1s หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    to simulate real life you're gonna need WAYYY more particles than these
    like the whole periodic table and more

  • @MLGplayeristaken
    @MLGplayeristaken 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder how the behaviour would change if there was variation in the particle size(weight) so that some particles will be less affected compared to others and some others will be more affected. I imagine like a solar system behaviour where the small ones will circle around big ones.

  • @EmanuelMalacarne
    @EmanuelMalacarne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really cool 👍🏼 Well done, bro

  • @davethesid8960
    @davethesid8960 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I liked the video because it was interesting mathematically, however, it still doesn't explain the origin of life but only that information tends to cluster whenever it's possible/favourable, or that pattern emerges when things are viewed from a larger scale (Ramsey). The process behind the formation of the earliest life is way more complex than what you presented since a lot of things need to be just right.

  • @eetswamykeetssa8477
    @eetswamykeetssa8477 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please I need to soundtracks to this, this is amazing

  • @jgus6
    @jgus6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I need this as a screen saver or desktop background :)

  • @ASoftTeddy
    @ASoftTeddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This would be really good to teach about various forces on molecules/particles, I would really hope you publish it, or sell it even on something like steam for people to use to teach ewlements of physics or biology

  • @QBitDevs
    @QBitDevs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Super cool!
    Btw what’s the background music?

  • @Roperdo7
    @Roperdo7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Im early! And I love the video!
    P.S. one hour ago i saw you had 59.9k subs but now its 60k

  • @cubrecamarojo2924
    @cubrecamarojo2924 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I need this as a screen saver

  • @arthurbernardo4543
    @arthurbernardo4543 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please, make more videos about that and how it is comparable to life PLEASE

  • @jameshoeft6755
    @jameshoeft6755 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    we need a part two that’s just a huge extremely long simulation

  • @Osprey2511
    @Osprey2511 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    While I must admit that this is a very interesting concept, and that It does appear to simulate life, you forgot a crucial detail about life. You see, just because they are able to move and are also able to create complex formations, they are unable to act of their own accord. The particles in this video are only moving simply based on the laws of attraction and repulsion. For example, if I were to take a bunch of north pole and south pole magnets, while they could repel and attract each other to form complex structures, they are unable to move and act of their own accord. The same problem would occur, even if there were a dozen different types of magnetic poles.
    On the contrary, life is able to move independent of outside forces. While some organisms have simple jobs that only require them to do a certain number of tasks, others are able to think for themselves and choose where they want to go, regardless of the forces of attraction and repulsion.
    So, I ask you this one simple question. How do these particles evolve into complex organisms that are able to move independently of each other? I fail to see how these structures are able to produce a T-Rex that is able to think for itself even if they had a billion years to do it.

    • @bmatt2626
      @bmatt2626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think "external forces" is inaccurate. Your atoms are pulling on the Earth while it pulls on you. Your atoms are affecting a magnet while it's affecting you. I think there is no real internal vs external distinction, it's all the same field, and you can algebra the + / - signs to describe it from the perspective of this or that object. But that's an arbitrary choice, and exactly the same level of complexity will emerge from exactly the same level of simplicity, regardless of which side you put all the minus signs in your conceptual representation of whatever nature is actually doing.

    • @Osprey2511
      @Osprey2511 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bmatt2626 Basically what I’m trying to say is that there’s more to life than just pulling and repelling. The video only shows how particles will act based solely on pulling and repelling alone.

    • @bmatt2626
      @bmatt2626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Osprey2511 I think the point is that even with only pulling and repelling, only 2 dimensions, only X compute, counterintuitively complex states and behaviors still arise. Of course it's not "real life", but understanding how "fake life" emerges from simple rules provides conceptual frameworks for people to investigate "real life". Playing with LEGOs isn't building skyscrapers, but if you ask 2 kids to analyze a skyscraper, the one who played with LEGOs will notice different things, ask different questions.
      These are _models_ of _aspects_ of a thing, and in *2D*, which of course you can't get "real life" out of anyway, because all the twisting and folding of real particle configurations allows for waaay more complexity.

    • @Osprey2511
      @Osprey2511 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bmatt2626 Because you mentioned Lego, I will put this debate to rest. Well played.

  • @sssamson1768
    @sssamson1768 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you add polarity to the particles, like repelling from one side and attracting in another?

  • @jakelesage4150
    @jakelesage4150 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You could even add individual mass to each particle type to better simulate real world particles. I'm not sure how complicated something like that would be and how much it would affect performance, but from my limited knowledge it doesn't seem like it would be immensely complicated.

  • @shadowblade6738
    @shadowblade6738 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the coolest thing I've ever seen 👏🙌

  • @MindsOfMany
    @MindsOfMany 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    9:04 love how the neon green and cyan cells kinda just sit there

  • @thestateoforegon9117
    @thestateoforegon9117 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is my attempt to catalog all the “lifeforms” that can evolve here. There are three main categories of life, which I will classify as Floaters, Coasters and Absorbers. Floaters are the simplest type of lifeform, being stationary creatures that just consist of one or two types of cells. These seem to be most common in simulations with low particle color counts. Species include 3:21 Flavum Botrus and 3:54 Red Centrum. Floaters do not necessarily have to be simple however, as the species Longa Forma demonstrates at 14:15. Coasters are species that revolve around being very fast, being able to speed across the map rapidly. These are surprisingly durable, being able to reform after an impact fairly easily. These can vary in speed, from being only moderately fast, like the species Neo Corpus at 4:13, or very fast, or the species family Purpura Caput at 6:35. Finally we have predators, which revolve around feeding on members of its own kind, as other prey species tend to destroy them. These can either be stationary or moving, as long as they can effectively catch prey and reform it into a part of itself. The species include Rubrum Luna at 11:02 and its ambush predator variant at 11:08 at the bottom of the simulation. My favorite species was the Navigare Navis at 10:45, a species of Coaster with a unique sail-shaped appearance. (God I spent way too long doing this lol)

  • @hexagon8899
    @hexagon8899 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:45 thats so cool. such a big gap inside the organisms

  • @AlienXtream1
    @AlienXtream1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    iv thought of some things to try that may make it even more realistic. or et very least may have intertesting results.
    nonlinear force curve. could result in more subtle interaction types
    "coupling" force emulation (i.e particles that get very close "stick" aggressively and rigidly to each other until they are far enough apart)
    tailored particle fields based on real world organic elements like hydrogen and carbon.
    multi field models. electromagnetic and strong/weak force emulation.

  • @Yuri-zs8kd
    @Yuri-zs8kd 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "Into the complex things we see today"
    *proceeds to show picture of a t-rex*

  • @MrVernitrax
    @MrVernitrax 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    soooo... now add posiibility for dots to change colour, not all to any, that would simiulate energy/mass/heat conversion... maybe? idk, I love the project!

  • @Suchega_Uber
    @Suchega_Uber 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now to mimic life you need to give them a time frame for how long they can be in certain clusters to mimic length of life. I think you would need certain clusters to have other functions to mimic the behavior of things like antibacterial wash meeting bacteria, but that might be too complex.

  • @seccuenta50ydos
    @seccuenta50ydos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if you add into this some kind of chemical reaction where when some specific particles get too close they would transform to other ones. I would like to see if something like reproduction can easily appear in this simulations also

  • @errorcode864g5
    @errorcode864g5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I beg you to make this code publicly available, I would love to toy around with it.

  • @aguywhoplaysgd
    @aguywhoplaysgd หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:34 those cells in the middle gonna have a talk with Pepsi in court

  • @visomatic6815
    @visomatic6815 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be cool to see bonding and conservation energy

  • @tschichpich
    @tschichpich หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:40 i love that the forces are symetrical but the world still evolved prefering one direction

  • @Neon64913
    @Neon64913 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THIS IS SO COOL

  • @danielwindler7404
    @danielwindler7404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:49 the sail boat creatures were my fav.