एकदम सुंदर समर्पक मुलाखत , एक व्यक्ती बहुरंगी प्रकुर्ती अशी चौफेर ज्ञानाचा ज्ञानी मराठी मातीशी एकनिष्ट ,महारांजांबद्दल निनांत आदर असणारे ,पाण्यासारखे निर्मळ असणारे कुणाचाही मुलाहीजा न ठेवता परखडपणे विचार मांडणारे ,ब्रांम्हण असुनही ब्रांम्हणवाद न गोंजारणारे ,राहुल गांधीची योग्यच असणारी स्तुती करणारे आणी बोलण्यात पुर्ण खरेपणा दाखवणारे ,तरुणांसाठी दीशादर्शक असणारेव गावाशी नाळ जोडलेले एकमेव राजु परुळेकरच असु शकतात .
राजू परुळेकर सर तुम्ही वेगवेगळ्या विषयांवर अशाच मुलाखती द्या . तुम्हाला ऐकणे ही एक अद्भुत गोष्ट आहे . तुम्हाला बोलताना ऐकतच राहावे असे वाटते ... धन्यवाद
आजच्या सद्यपरिस्थितीत राजू पारोळेकर सर विश्वंभर चौधरी सर निखिल वागळे सर असीम सरोदे सर, कुमार सप्तर्षी सर निरंजन टकले सर यांच्या सारखे असंख्य विचारक फक्त विचारक नसून उद्याचा आदर्श भारत निर्माण करणाऱ्या असंख्य तरुणाच्या दिशादर्शक वाटाचं आहे ❤❤ खूप छान मुलाखत सर
खालील कामेंट बघा. काही लोकांना वाईट वाटतं की काही लोक हिंदू विरोधी आहेत म्हणून. पण लक्षात ठेवा जोपर्यंत हिंदू धर्म समुळ नष्ट होत नाही तोपर्यंत भारताची प्रगती होणार नाही.
या विचारवंतांचे विचार जर तुम्हाला पटत नसतील तर तुमचे विचार काय आहेत हे जनतेसमोर मांडा ना तुमचे विचार पटलेच तर जनता तुम्हाला ऐकेल .नाहीतर .सोडतील.@prathameshcreation9167
आजच्या काळात आपण कुठे चालो आहे कळेनासे झाले आहे. त्यामध्ये सरांची मुलाखत एखाद्या मोठ्या व्रुक्षाच्या थंड सावली सारखी वाटते. सतत देशाला अशा लोकांची गरज आहे. भारत स्वतंत्र झाला तेंव्हा भारतात ऐक समॄध्द विचार आसलेले व खुप वाचन असलेले नेते मिळाले. धन्यवाद सर..🙏
सादर प्रणाम सर ,,आपले विचार ऐक अभ्यास असतो,विचारवंत आणि संत समान आहेत,,जे समाज जागृती प्रबोधन करण्यासाठी आवश्यक आहे,ते भाग्य महाराष्ट्राला सारख्या पुरोगामी विचारवंता मुळे लाभते,,,धन्यवाद,,सर
अतिशय महत्त्वाचे, प्रेरणादायी व्यक्तीमत्व आहेत मान. राजू परुळेकर साहेब. त्यांची बहुतेक सर्व मते आवडीने ऐकतो. आपल्या देशाचा भविष्यकाळ किती वाईट असेल ते पाहतो.
प्रथमेश खूपच कालानरुप उदबोधक असा संवाद होता.अर्थीत तूझे प्रश्न आणि त्याला राजू परुळेरांनी केलेले अक्षरश: दणदणीत वार होते.उत्तर खरी होती परिस्थिति जन्य होती रुदयाला भिडत होती पण भिती वाटत होती.आता आपल्याला वाचवायला पुन्हां बाबासाहेब जन्म नाही घेणार.मी वयोवृद्ध आहे.जाईन पटकन पण पुढच्या पिढीचे काय ?
Please dub/translate this extremely educative programme in hindi and english. I wish to thank both of you for bringing such wonderful shows which are apt and important in the present times. 🎉
ज्यांच्या हाती सत्ता नको जायला त्यांच्या हाती सत्ता आहे, त्यात जनतेला अजून कळत नाहीये की त्यांचा हित कशात आहे, तरी मला अपेक्षा आहे ह्या निवडणुकीत कमीत कमी महाराष्ट्रात तरी जनता योग्य निर्णय घेईल
Insightful...eye opener and a video that makes you think and gives inspiration to read more and do research. Thank you for this amazing video. Congratulations and all the best ❤ 🎉
1:00 That was really nice✌️. you are absolutely right sir, no need to do theatrics . Sincerity and accuracy is your USP. But presentation and articutativeness has a momentous effect in media.
Raju sir and P Patil sir Please make a whole some video on modern day slavery in IT industry, manufacturing sector and how we are not getting enough time to think. Please make a new video on it. And it will be good if you put this podcast on Spotify 😊 Kudos to you for such a wonderful discussion
That’s the problem people with such thoughts are not leaders They just talk in shows If he was a spokesperson of congress things would’ve been different पण काँग्रेस राहुल गांधी पलिकडे जाऊ शकत नाई 😂😂😂😂
after the election and all you both should start a conversation regarding upanishad and veda in episode forms so that people get the perspective of the philosopy which u both are doing in this video. great explanation parulekarji
Cement बाबत जे तुम्ही बोलले सर, exact विचार माझ्या मनात आला होता की महाराष्ट्राच्या प्रगती साठी कधी कधी वाटत की North Indian राज्यांपासुन जर वेगळा असता तर बरं झालं असत
आधी टिळक, आगरकर, गोखले , रानडे , कर्वे , जोशी अशे ब्राम्हण पुढारी होते महाराष्ट्रात म्हणून पुरोगामी चळवळ उभी राहिली. आता ब्राम्हण निघून गेले आणि अर्ध्या अकलेचे नेते आले.. म्हणून महाराष्ट्र आता पुरोगामी चे केंद्र राहिले नाही
I like what he has mentioned. Yes its true that we are living in an era of thugs. But some things which he mentioned are not right. I will quote from someone who answered similar question on Quora and it makes sense: Why did Lord Rama kill the shudra Shambuka for doing the pious activity of tapasya? The Shambuka story goes like this: “When Lord Ram is reigning as a virtuous king, a humble aged Brahmin comes to him with his dead son in his arms. The sages explained to Ram that this unfortunate death must have happened because a Shudra must be practicing Vedic penances. Ram goes on a tour of inspection in his flying chariot (Pushpak Vimana) and finds an ascetic doing austerities. The ascetic informed Ram that he is Shambuka, a Shudra, and performing this rigorous penance. Rama kills the Shudra for doing the pious activity of tapasya (penance) and Vedic chanting.” “There is no such incident in Ram’s history depicted in Valmiki’s Ramayan. Before discussing that, hypothetically, let’s take the story for the face value. Let’s agree that Ram kills Shambuka.” Reason? “Shambuka is a Shudra who is not supposed to do Vedic tapasya (penance). The incident is a black mark and a proof that Ram hated Shudras.” Ram kills Ravan, who is a Brahmin. Ravan had also performed Vedic penance. So going by the same logic of Shambuka story, Ram hated Brahmins. What’s more, Ram also fought with Parasuram. Parasuram was also a Brahmin. Hence Ram was a Brahmin hater. He was an anti-Brahmin! Again, Ram also fought with few Kshatriya Kings. That makes him Kshatriya hater too! Ram killed the monkey King Vali; hence he is an animal hater… Probably those “intelligent” people should write to Maneka Gandhi to banish Ram as he hurt animals. “Please don’t try to sell such lousy logics to me. I am not buying…”I replied. The Shambuka story is illogical and misfit. It lacks clarity and genuinity. To start with, there are nearly 300 versions of Ramayana. The genuine and authentic Ramayana is written by Valimiki, who incidentally is a Dalit. There is NO mention of Shambuka in Valmiki Ramayana. If Ram was a castiest, why should the Dalit Valmiki hail him as the ONLY perfect man in the earth? Also, the story of killing Shambuka is NOT mentioned in Srimad Bhagavatam, which again an authentic Purana. Even in the retelling of Ramayana in Mahabharata (which again is an authentic epic) Vanaparva, there is no mention of this incident. Valmiki Ramayan is history of Ram. Most of other versions of Ramayan are exaggerated, myth-added, unbelievable and art of fiction. Ram was not a superman. Ram is a fact for historians. Since people worship him, lot of myths and legends added to his story. Yes, the Shambuka story appears in the Uttara Kanda (Sarga 74-78) of Adhyatma Ramayana and not in the original Valmiki Ramayan. Uttara Kanda is not authentic. According to historians the story of Shambuka is added to Ramayana at least after 5th century AD. The content, language and grammar of Uttar Kanda do not sync with Ramayana. This khand contains several questionable and polished content and contradictory with the original Ramayan. Long ago, my daughter who had read this story asked me: “Appa, it was clearly said in the Ramayana that Lord Ram returned Pushpak Viman to its original owner Kuber after returning to Ayodhya. So how come Ram went for searching of Shambuka by Rama with help of Pushpak Viman?” Even school kids can see this contradiction. When you add up such castiest stories to provoke and appease, please at least use minimum common sense. The entire Shambuka incident is 100% fake. It is said by ‘Valmiki’ that in Sri Ram’s reign there were no premature deaths in his kingdom. Then how come a Brahmin kid died prematurely? It’s contradicting Valmiki’s claim, right? Now, it is time for some logical thinking. - The Ramayana was written by a Dalit, Valmiki. He was number one devotee of Ram. He proclaims Ram as perfect man in the earth. He addresses Ram ‘Maryada Purushottam’ which means “The Ideal Best Man”. And he clearly says that Ram doesn’t discriminate. Ram was a Sanatan Dharmi, how can he discriminate? -The entire base of Ramayan is a curse of Shudra. Ram’s father Dasarath kills a Shudra young mendicant named Shravan by mistake. His blind parents cursed Dasaratha that he too would experience “Putrashoka” (grief due to loss of a son). Would Dasarath’s son invite another curse by killing a Shudra again? Is he that stupid and arrogant? - Ram embraced Nishada King (out caste, lower than the lowest class) Guha. There are only few people that Lord embraced. - Ram ate the fruits offered by Dalit lady Shabari. Shabri belonged to Bhil/Tribal community. It was not just fruits, but half eaten left overs by Shabari. - There are many examples from Ramayana which prove that Lord Ram enjoyed a healthy relationship with different members of Shudra community. Rama didn’t kill any pious Shudras whom he came across. So, why only Shambuka? If he were a casteist, why would he take the help of Hanuman, Sugreeva and others? - In some versions of Ramayan, it is mentioned that Shambuka was not even a shudra. He was an Asura by the name of Jambha. True to his name, he was extremely arrogant. His intention of tapasya was to enjoy Parvathi (Shiva’s consort). So, isn’t killing of Shambuka appropriate? The testimony of Sage Narada clearly states that Lord Ram is noble, unbiased and affectionate towards everyone. Truth is that in the Vedic age there was no caste system. Only Varna system was in practice which has nothing to do with today’s social caste system. Caste system came into practice in India, when alien cultures invaded peace-loving Indians and created insecurity among them. Few ignorant priests interpolated the Texts like Ramayana and Manu Smriti with verses supporting caste system. These interpolations were done with vested interests. So leaving aside the allegations that Ramayana had discriminatory origins, I like the viewpoints. Great command over language too.
Raju parulekar is only smart man of congress . I some what 80% agree with you. I voted for bjp because I want development in vidharbha region because congress ignored it for years
Thanks!
राजू परुळेकरानी बोलत राहावे अणि आम्ही ऐकत रहावे ....छान वाटते
हि मुलाखत फक्त खऱ्या अर्थाने सुशिक्षित लोकांसाठी आहे .
@@swapnilravindra3346 For brain washed educated peoples 🤧😌
एकदम सुंदर समर्पक मुलाखत , एक व्यक्ती बहुरंगी प्रकुर्ती अशी चौफेर ज्ञानाचा ज्ञानी मराठी मातीशी एकनिष्ट ,महारांजांबद्दल निनांत आदर असणारे ,पाण्यासारखे निर्मळ असणारे कुणाचाही मुलाहीजा न ठेवता परखडपणे विचार मांडणारे ,ब्रांम्हण असुनही ब्रांम्हणवाद न गोंजारणारे ,राहुल गांधीची योग्यच असणारी स्तुती करणारे आणी बोलण्यात पुर्ण खरेपणा दाखवणारे ,तरुणांसाठी दीशादर्शक असणारेव गावाशी नाळ जोडलेले एकमेव राजु परुळेकरच असु शकतात .
राजू सर म्हणजे
चौफेर क्रांतीचे विचार उधळणारे विचारक आहेव.यात शंका नाही .
आपल्या विचारांची तरुण पिढीला अत्यंत गरज आहे.धन्यवाद राजू सर❤
राजू परुळेकर सर तुम्ही वेगवेगळ्या विषयांवर अशाच मुलाखती द्या . तुम्हाला ऐकणे ही एक अद्भुत गोष्ट आहे . तुम्हाला बोलताना ऐकतच राहावे असे वाटते ... धन्यवाद
आजच्या सद्यपरिस्थितीत राजू पारोळेकर सर विश्वंभर चौधरी सर निखिल वागळे सर असीम सरोदे सर, कुमार सप्तर्षी सर निरंजन टकले सर यांच्या सारखे असंख्य विचारक
फक्त विचारक नसून उद्याचा आदर्श भारत निर्माण करणाऱ्या असंख्य तरुणाच्या दिशादर्शक वाटाचं आहे
❤❤ खूप छान मुलाखत सर
ह्यांना विचारवंत म्हणणे जरा अतीच वाटते. अविचारवंत म्हणा.प्रश्न विचारणारे पण कमाल आहेत. हल्ली कोण काय सुरू करेल, नेम नाही.
खालील कामेंट बघा.
काही लोकांना वाईट वाटतं की काही लोक हिंदू विरोधी आहेत म्हणून. पण लक्षात ठेवा जोपर्यंत हिंदू धर्म समुळ नष्ट होत नाही तोपर्यंत भारताची प्रगती होणार नाही.
त्यांना कोणी विचारत नाही
या विचारवंतांचे विचार जर तुम्हाला पटत नसतील तर तुमचे विचार काय आहेत हे जनतेसमोर मांडा ना तुमचे विचार पटलेच तर जनता तुम्हाला ऐकेल .नाहीतर .सोडतील.@prathameshcreation9167
काही वर्ष फक्त , एक खराब statement आणि मग UAPA 😂
आजच्या काळात आपण कुठे चालो आहे कळेनासे झाले आहे. त्यामध्ये सरांची मुलाखत एखाद्या मोठ्या व्रुक्षाच्या थंड सावली सारखी वाटते. सतत देशाला अशा लोकांची गरज आहे. भारत स्वतंत्र झाला तेंव्हा भारतात ऐक समॄध्द विचार आसलेले व खुप वाचन असलेले नेते मिळाले.
धन्यवाद सर..🙏
होय प्रथमेश तूझ्या पध्दतीनेच बोल यातच पत्रकारीतेची खरी तळमळ आत्मियता दिसून येते.
वैचारिक गुलामगिरी ची जाणिव करुन देणारा हा episode आहे..thank you Raju sir..तुमचे विचार ऐकून थक्क व्हायला होत.
सखोल चर्चा प्रत्येकाला विचार करायला लावणारी होती. त्याबद्दल तुम्हा दोघांचेही खुप खुप आभार🙏💕
राजू परुळेकर ! हॅट्स ऑफ ! काय प्रबोधन केले आहे आपण ! खरोखर जेवढे धन्यवाद देऊ तेवढे थोडेच आहेत !
राजु परुळेकर सर, आपण परिवर्तनवादी विचाप्रवर्तक आहात. आपण जी मांडणी करता त्याला तोडच नसते,ur great great sir.
खर सांगायचं तर महाराष्ट्रात इतके पुरोगामी विचारांचे नेते , सुधारकर्ते, संत होऊन गेले तरी आज महाराष्ट्राची जी वैचारिक परिस्थिती आहे ते बघून लाज वाटते😢
काही कारण नाही, ह्या वातावरणात पुन्हा विचार चालू होईल, फक्त प्रश्न विचारता रहा आणि हो कोणी मत मांडत असेल तर त्याचे पुरावे मागा.
Right @@siddheshjadhav
सादर प्रणाम सर ,,आपले विचार ऐक अभ्यास असतो,विचारवंत आणि संत समान आहेत,,जे समाज जागृती प्रबोधन करण्यासाठी आवश्यक आहे,ते भाग्य महाराष्ट्राला सारख्या पुरोगामी विचारवंता मुळे लाभते,,,धन्यवाद,,सर
पुरोगामी अवॉर्ड goes to batlela बामण राजू परुळेकर... बाकी बामण गेले चुलीत हेच तुमचं पुरोगामित्व..savarkar, फडके, चाफेकर, कान्हेरे, पेशवे
राजू परुळेकरांचे ज्ञान हा अमुल्य ठेवा आहे त्यांच्यामुळे विचारांना चालना मिळते , खुप खुप धन्यवाद
😂😂😂
धन्यवाद...
खूप खू लिहाव अस वाटतय .ईतका चांगला भाग आहे हा. धन्यवाद.
धन्यवाद श्रीयुत राजु परुळेकर !
अंतर्मुख करणारी मुलाखत
महात्मा फुले हे सामाजिक क्रांतीचे आद्य प्रवर्तक होते असो
अत्यंत विचार प्रवर्तक असा हा व्हिडीओ झाला आहे तुम्हा दोघांचे खूप आभार.
अतिशय महत्त्वाचे, प्रेरणादायी व्यक्तीमत्व आहेत मान. राजू परुळेकर साहेब. त्यांची बहुतेक सर्व मते आवडीने ऐकतो. आपल्या देशाचा भविष्यकाळ किती वाईट असेल ते पाहतो.
अतिशय महत्त्वाचे विचार राजु परुळेकर यांनी मांडले आहेत. मुलाखतीबद्दल प्रथमेश पाटील यांचे अभिनंदन.
सुंदर विचार
Raju parulekar sir ...is really great .....
Excellent interview! What a great intellectual! Hats off to Mr. Raju Parulekar!
राजु परुळेकर हे विचारवंत आहेत त्यांची मूलकत ऐकवली व त्यांच्या विचारांमुळे सामान्य जनतेलाही एक विचारांची वेगळी दिशा सापडू लागते .❤🎉🎉
महाराष्ट्रातला उत्कृष्ट फिलोसोफर
प्रथमेश खूपच कालानरुप उदबोधक असा संवाद होता.अर्थीत तूझे प्रश्न आणि त्याला राजू परुळेरांनी केलेले अक्षरश: दणदणीत वार होते.उत्तर खरी होती परिस्थिति जन्य होती रुदयाला भिडत होती पण भिती वाटत होती.आता आपल्याला वाचवायला पुन्हां बाबासाहेब जन्म नाही घेणार.मी वयोवृद्ध आहे.जाईन पटकन पण पुढच्या पिढीचे काय ?
महत्त्वाचं स्पष्ट सडेतोड विश्लेषण. तुमच्या नेहमीच्या सौम्य स्वरात 👍🏽
Uttam charcha, Uttam vichar.
परुळेकरांच्या मुलाखती हिंदितही जास्तीत जास्त झाल्या पाहिजेत .
जैसे आहात तसेच राहणे , हेदेखील भावणारे आहे !
Congratulations to you sir for your darring to Say reality of rss thought govt
Thanks!
Please dub/translate this extremely educative programme in hindi and english. I wish to thank both of you for bringing such wonderful shows which are apt and important in the present times. 🎉
Satya Meva Jayate, Truth Alone Triumphs, Jai Hind
परुळेकर तुमच्या विचारांशी शंभर टक्के सहमत. कारण त्यांचा सच्चेपणा
खूप छान माहिती
खूप खूप छान माहिती दिलीत आपण सर
Great 👍
वेक्त होण्याची भीती वाटणं,
किंवा वेक्त न होण,
मग ते जगणं जगणं नाही.
बाळ ठाकरेंनी पुरोगामी महाराष्ट्र नासवीला असे राजू परुळेकर यांचे ठाम मत आहे यावर मशाल शिवसेनेचे काय मत आहे
Great insights, thank you, both of you.
अगदी बरोबर वास्तव मांडल आहे
Great ideas , always from Raju sir.
❤खुप छान
जय भीम जय शिवराय जय फुले जय शाहू
खूप सुंदर,परत परत पहावी
ऐकायला फारच awadate
Thank you for such wonderful discussion 🙏
@shubhadap...??????
खूप महत्त्वाची
Thanks
Very well rounded conversation ❤
ज्यांच्या हाती सत्ता नको जायला त्यांच्या हाती सत्ता आहे, त्यात जनतेला अजून कळत नाहीये की त्यांचा हित कशात आहे, तरी मला अपेक्षा आहे ह्या निवडणुकीत कमीत कमी महाराष्ट्रात तरी जनता योग्य निर्णय घेईल
Good information sir
Sir great
Insightful...eye opener and a video that makes you think and gives inspiration to read more and do research.
Thank you for this amazing video.
Congratulations and all the best ❤ 🎉
Great 🌹🚩
अप्रतिम
एक दिवस राजू परुळेकर मला नास्तिक बनवतील
😅
😂 खर आहे शाहू फुले आंबेडकर वाद्यांनी आणि कर्मठ ब्राम्हणांनी हिंदुत्वाचा गढून टाकलाय.. पूनृतजीवन करावं लागेल
फक्त हिंदूविरोधी बनवणार.
कारण
फक्त हिंदू नास्तिक असतो.
😂😂😂
राजू परुळेकर फक्त हिंदू धर्मविरोधी आहेत.
म्हणून तुम्ही नास्तिक बनणार नाही. फारतर धर्म बदलणार.
Nice and true analysis
1:00 That was really nice✌️. you are absolutely right sir, no need to do theatrics . Sincerity and accuracy is your USP. But presentation and articutativeness has a momentous effect in media.
छान विवेचन केले आहे .धन्यवाद
Awesome sir❤
Super duper
Raju sir and P Patil sir
Please make a whole some video on modern day slavery in IT industry, manufacturing sector and how we are not getting enough time to think. Please make a new video on it. And it will be good if you put this podcast on Spotify 😊
Kudos to you for such a wonderful discussion
खूप छान
That’s the problem people with such thoughts are not leaders
They just talk in shows
If he was a spokesperson of congress things would’ve been different
पण काँग्रेस राहुल गांधी पलिकडे जाऊ शकत नाई 😂😂😂😂
Big fan sir
after the election and all you both should start a conversation regarding upanishad and veda in episode forms so that people get the perspective of the philosopy which u both are doing in this video. great explanation parulekarji
Great knowledge given by you sir thanks sir
Apratim mulakhat
A very enlightening interview! Thanks to the guest, host and to Indie journal.
Very knowledgeable information.
राजू सर जीवन जगन एकदम कठिन झाले आहे, सारखी घुसमत होते विचारांची , महापुरुष व तुमचे विचार च प्राणवायु आहेत, या जगात सारख रडू येत आनी जग नकोस वाटत.
Remember great people of our country. 🎉try to think rational sir
Too radu nako. Shtishali ho
मुस्लिम सुधारणा साठी एक व्हिडिओ करा सर.
एक निष्ठावान मेंबर.🙏
अप्रतिम 👌🙏
Atishay sundar mahiti dili
Mast
Great thanks
Cement बाबत जे तुम्ही बोलले सर, exact विचार माझ्या मनात आला होता की महाराष्ट्राच्या प्रगती साठी कधी कधी वाटत की North Indian राज्यांपासुन जर वेगळा असता तर बरं झालं असत
कारण आता आपण BJP विरूद्ध जाऊन निवडणूक जिंकलो जरी , तरी Central Government येनकेन प्रकारे आपल्याला त्रास देणारच😢
Great talk!
महाराष्ट्र राज्याची वाटचाल गायपट्टा राज्याच्या दिशेने व तेही जोरकसपणे चालु आहे.
कारण सत्ताधारी वर्ग त्या वर्गाचे अनुकरण करत आहे, महाराष्ट्र अधोगतीला चालले आहे.
आधी टिळक, आगरकर, गोखले , रानडे , कर्वे , जोशी अशे ब्राम्हण पुढारी होते महाराष्ट्रात म्हणून पुरोगामी चळवळ उभी राहिली.
आता ब्राम्हण निघून गेले आणि अर्ध्या अकलेचे नेते आले.. म्हणून महाराष्ट्र आता पुरोगामी चे केंद्र राहिले नाही
इस्लाम खतरे में है .
मोहम्मद ने 55 व्या वर्षी 6 वर्ष्याच्या आयशाला झवले ...हे एैकल्यावर राग का येतो मुस्लिमाना?
योग्य te example देऊन
Excellent information 👍
Jaybhim
🙏🙏
Raju parulekar sir dev manus ahet
Please put english subtitles, love your programs :)
Your thoughts are communial
अभ्यासपूर्ण, संतुलित अन् खूप सकस…!!
Mazi ek request ahe ki tuhmi marathi madali changali books je aaj cha generation ne vachali pahije tya var ek episode karava
❤
राजु सर,,❤
शील प्रज्ञा सत्य करुणा समता बंधुता***
Quite Good
You are most clear and authentic than Ravish Kumar,my dear.
I like what he has mentioned. Yes its true that we are living in an era of thugs. But some things which he mentioned are not right. I will quote from someone who answered similar question on Quora and it makes sense:
Why did Lord Rama kill the shudra Shambuka for doing the pious activity of tapasya?
The Shambuka story goes like this: “When Lord Ram is reigning as a virtuous king, a humble aged Brahmin comes to him with his dead son in his arms. The sages explained to Ram that this unfortunate death must have happened because a Shudra must be practicing Vedic penances. Ram goes on a tour of inspection in his flying chariot (Pushpak Vimana) and finds an ascetic doing austerities. The ascetic informed Ram that he is Shambuka, a Shudra, and performing this rigorous penance. Rama kills the Shudra for doing the pious activity of tapasya (penance) and Vedic chanting.”
“There is no such incident in Ram’s history depicted in Valmiki’s Ramayan. Before discussing that, hypothetically, let’s take the story for the face value. Let’s agree that Ram kills Shambuka.”
Reason?
“Shambuka is a Shudra who is not supposed to do Vedic tapasya (penance). The incident is a black mark and a proof that Ram hated Shudras.”
Ram kills Ravan, who is a Brahmin. Ravan had also performed Vedic penance. So going by the same logic of Shambuka story, Ram hated Brahmins.
What’s more, Ram also fought with Parasuram. Parasuram was also a Brahmin. Hence Ram was a Brahmin hater. He was an anti-Brahmin!
Again, Ram also fought with few Kshatriya Kings. That makes him Kshatriya hater too!
Ram killed the monkey King Vali; hence he is an animal hater… Probably those “intelligent” people should write to Maneka Gandhi to banish Ram as he hurt animals.
“Please don’t try to sell such lousy logics to me. I am not buying…”I replied.
The Shambuka story is illogical and misfit. It lacks clarity and genuinity.
To start with, there are nearly 300 versions of Ramayana. The genuine and authentic Ramayana is written by Valimiki, who incidentally is a Dalit. There is NO mention of Shambuka in Valmiki Ramayana. If Ram was a castiest, why should the Dalit Valmiki hail him as the ONLY perfect man in the earth?
Also, the story of killing Shambuka is NOT mentioned in Srimad Bhagavatam, which again an authentic Purana. Even in the retelling of Ramayana in Mahabharata (which again is an authentic epic) Vanaparva, there is no mention of this incident.
Valmiki Ramayan is history of Ram. Most of other versions of Ramayan are exaggerated, myth-added, unbelievable and art of fiction. Ram was not a superman. Ram is a fact for historians. Since people worship him, lot of myths and legends added to his story.
Yes, the Shambuka story appears in the Uttara Kanda (Sarga 74-78) of Adhyatma Ramayana and not in the original Valmiki Ramayan. Uttara Kanda is not authentic. According to historians the story of Shambuka is added to Ramayana at least after 5th century AD. The content, language and grammar of Uttar Kanda do not sync with Ramayana. This khand contains several questionable and polished content and contradictory with the original Ramayan.
Long ago, my daughter who had read this story asked me: “Appa, it was clearly said in the Ramayana that Lord Ram returned Pushpak Viman to its original owner Kuber after returning to Ayodhya. So how come Ram went for searching of Shambuka by Rama with help of Pushpak Viman?”
Even school kids can see this contradiction. When you add up such castiest stories to provoke and appease, please at least use minimum common sense. The entire Shambuka incident is 100% fake.
It is said by ‘Valmiki’ that in Sri Ram’s reign there were no premature deaths in his kingdom. Then how come a Brahmin kid died prematurely? It’s contradicting Valmiki’s claim, right?
Now, it is time for some logical thinking.
- The Ramayana was written by a Dalit, Valmiki. He was number one devotee of Ram. He proclaims Ram as perfect man in the earth. He addresses Ram ‘Maryada Purushottam’ which means “The Ideal Best Man”. And he clearly says that Ram doesn’t discriminate. Ram was a Sanatan Dharmi, how can he discriminate?
-The entire base of Ramayan is a curse of Shudra. Ram’s father Dasarath kills a Shudra young mendicant named Shravan by mistake. His blind parents cursed Dasaratha that he too would experience “Putrashoka” (grief due to loss of a son). Would Dasarath’s son invite another curse by killing a Shudra again? Is he that stupid and arrogant?
- Ram embraced Nishada King (out caste, lower than the lowest class) Guha. There are only few people that Lord embraced.
- Ram ate the fruits offered by Dalit lady Shabari. Shabri belonged to Bhil/Tribal community. It was not just fruits, but half eaten left overs by Shabari.
- There are many examples from Ramayana which prove that Lord Ram enjoyed a healthy relationship with different members of Shudra community. Rama didn’t kill any pious Shudras whom he came across. So, why only Shambuka? If he were a casteist, why would he take the help of Hanuman, Sugreeva and others?
- In some versions of Ramayan, it is mentioned that Shambuka was not even a shudra. He was an Asura by the name of Jambha. True to his name, he was extremely arrogant. His intention of tapasya was to enjoy Parvathi (Shiva’s consort). So, isn’t killing of Shambuka appropriate?
The testimony of Sage Narada clearly states that Lord Ram is noble, unbiased and affectionate towards everyone.
Truth is that in the Vedic age there was no caste system. Only Varna system was in practice which has nothing to do with today’s social caste system. Caste system came into practice in India, when alien cultures invaded peace-loving Indians and created insecurity among them. Few ignorant priests interpolated the Texts like Ramayana and Manu Smriti with verses supporting caste system. These interpolations were done with vested interests.
So leaving aside the allegations that Ramayana had discriminatory origins, I like the viewpoints. Great command over language too.
नशा वाढली आहे आणि सगळ्यात खतरनाक नशा ही धर्माची झाली आहे .
👍💯
महाराष्ट्र पहिल्यांदा ज्ञानेश्वर माउली तुकाराम महाराज छ शिवाजी आणि छ संभाजी महाराजांचा आहे .... बाकी सगळे नंतर .
Pudhe pan Mahatma Phule...Ambedkar,Shahu Maharaj
Raju parulekar is only smart man of congress . I some what 80% agree with you. I voted for bjp because I want development in vidharbha region because congress ignored it for years