One of the Most Underrated Luxury Dive Watches on the Market - Glashütte Original SeaQ 39.5mm

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 331

  • @garyboyle695
    @garyboyle695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It's not underrated by those that look beyond Rolex.

  • @johnm5131
    @johnm5131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    oddly, the closed caseback is appropriate for a "dive" watch and historically accurate to the vintage original. Also, the back finish is sublime. I do miss seeing the movement, but agree with GO's decision. Furthermore, if the exhibition back increases the thickness, this would also remove the proportions that make this watch special. I bought one and the 'feel' is special...

    • @dorado0359
      @dorado0359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Sir, you nailed it. I've been sitting here for nearly an hour, pondering and wondering why so many closed-back opponents don't get that.

    • @johng5219
      @johng5219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I appreciate the closed caseback and the deep engraving on it. I like it better on a tool ( although luxury ) watch such as this. This is a watch for enthusiasts as Teddy mentioned.

    • @johnm5131
      @johnm5131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@johng5219 and also, they did not cut a single corner. Every watch I see in this category either has terrible lume, a non-micro adjusting clasp, or something else that just makes the product seem less special. The SeaQ gets the most wrist-time in my collection!

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    you're so right! Glashutte Original is beyond underrated! Loved this!

  • @yankeesandgiants1886
    @yankeesandgiants1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I have both the 39.5mm and the 43.2mm panorama date in black on the green cloth strap, Both are great watches. The bigger one is good for the office with great wrist presence. The movement is beautiful and it has a 100 hour power reserve if that's important to you. The smaller version is great for weekends with the retro look. It's not a Rolex- its something much better- you can't compare the finishing and the movement. It compares to the Blancpain 50 Fathoms. You can buy these for at least 30% off. BTW, most watches can be had for 20-30% off at ADs except the sport watches of Rolex, AP, Vacheron, and Patek, Total bargains but not for everyone. Why every Rolex fanboy has to justify their submariner I'll never know.

    • @621jihoonkim
      @621jihoonkim 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you have withe the strap or bracelet?

  • @Sandbag1300
    @Sandbag1300 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Purchased a 39.5mm in Blue with a fully brushed bracelet from the AD. Choice was between the Explorer 1 new or the GO. The GO is visually more interesting, finished to a much higher standard, and has a vibrant dark blue dial with personality that dances in different lighting. On a time graph is meets or exceeds the accuracy of my GMT Master 2 in all six positions - yes, better than +/- 2 seconds/day. Best of all, I can wear it anywhere on a rubber or leather strap because it does not attract attention until someone gets up close - then, it is a dazzler. I do believe that this watch will be much more popular in the next few years as GO picks up their marketing and probably releases a version with a black dial with white markers and a white dial with black markers.

  • @simonwright6882
    @simonwright6882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I totally agree about the case back. A display caseback would elevate this piece to the level of its big brother and might just be the reason to choose it over a submariner.

  • @michaelniemer4449
    @michaelniemer4449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Totally agree with that shade of blue, it is mesmerizing. And hiding that beautiful movement; must be one of those "we did this just for the watchmakers" things, perhaps?

  • @drnick40
    @drnick40 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I own this awesome watch. Black with a gray textile strap. Got a black rubber strap from B2 straps of Switzerland, which is the other OEM strap for the SeaQ. The watch has an amazing retro look but most importantly this is one of the most accurate mechanical watches I have ever seen. No exaggeration! The watch runs fast by 2 seconds per month!!! This borders a high end quartz movement performance. Mind blowing. And considering it can be found pre owned for around $6000 ot even less, tris is one of the best bargains in luxury diver watch niche. A watch for real enthusiasts.

  • @davidmeier8860
    @davidmeier8860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The more people ignore this brand, the more I like it. I am tempted to sell my Sub, buy this watch and pocket some cash. I really like the simple design. The two tone is beautiful. Keep up the good work.

  • @richardcyr1346
    @richardcyr1346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I absolutely love this watch! I love that it’s a lesser known, but high quality piece!

  • @stickshifter8
    @stickshifter8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hi Teddy. Great content as always, detailed review, informative comments. I am lucky to own its bigger brother for over one year now, cherish it every day. The bracelet, as you mentioned, is amazingly overengineered and a little known (or little mentioned) functionality is that the 7mm adjustment can be deployed one-handedly (increase AND decrease lenght) with the watch on the wrist. Cheers!!

  • @j.burgess4459
    @j.burgess4459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Yep, the SeaQ (like the Blancpain Fifty-Fathoms) is a cut above Rolex and Omega.

    • @johanhirte9661
      @johanhirte9661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Of course !! Rolex makes 1 mio watches 100% machines used for them vs GO ...... a real watchmaker.
      I give u a small story. When Omega had problems with the Co axial swatch group used GO watchmakers to solve the problem.
      Booom !

    • @emeerhakeem1869
      @emeerhakeem1869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, but the fifty fathoms is too big. This is a lot more suitable

  • @j.j.h.atemycereal
    @j.j.h.atemycereal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I was talking to my local AD and he said something very similar: He KNOWS brands like Glashutte Original and even Grand Seiko are well worth the price. But his problem is convincing wives and grandparents who come into his store looking for a Rolex as a gift that these are just as good (or better, in many ways). So you hit the nail on the head saying it's definitely an "Enthusiast's Brand". Personally I'd go for the larger 43mm size, but both sizes are gorgeous. Thanks, Teddy.

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good take and true. This is a wonderful watch it’s in a competitive range for price and when people save up many want status. This watch doesn’t have that as much as others but it is still phenomenal. If this was able to get closer to Seamaster pricing it would be considered much more.

    • @yankeesandgiants1886
      @yankeesandgiants1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Totally agree. It leaves the GOs and Grand Seiko's affordable so I'm okay with that. When I see a Rolex on a wrist I'm thinking it's a fake or they don't necessarily even like watches. When you see a GO or Grand Seiko, you know they love watches.

  • @ctboy4467
    @ctboy4467 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Though the 39mm would fit me better, I purchased the 43mm SeaQ mostly because I wanted to see the movement- especially at this price point. In addition, I like the panorama date. I’m very pleased with it!

    • @shuabshungne8043
      @shuabshungne8043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It also has 100 hour Power reserve!!!

    • @548vikings
      @548vikings 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@shuabshungne8043: Also the bracelet adjust is outstanding. I have Rolex with 5mm adjust, why even bother?

    • @gynat5968
      @gynat5968 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My choice is the 39.5 blue dial panorama date as well.

  • @ryanelectra225
    @ryanelectra225 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bought one of these from your store yesterday! AJ is great.

  • @j.t1682
    @j.t1682 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I own one and I have a few Rolex pieces too. The quality of this piece is at another level but brand recognition is at the bottom. It is the kind of watch you have to see it in person to appreciate it. I feel that it is worth every penny.

  • @VmanStudioz
    @VmanStudioz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    As always; you nailed it! Great review. I would only add this watch boast ISO Certification too; it’s a true divers watch meant for the Open Sea. I agree, finishing not quite on par with Blancpain FF, or Lange, but certainly far above Omega, Breitling, and Rolex. Grand Seiko and JLC might be the only legit competitors here. However, GOs design queues and finish really showcase how much they’re coming into their own. It looks nothing at all like a homage; they’re definitely diving into their own swim lane; pun intended.

    • @DrNitin14
      @DrNitin14 ปีที่แล้ว

      GO's finishing is better than the BP fifty fathoms IMO. Movement finishing is also better than JLC.
      JLC has the better case finishing.
      BP Fifty fathoms has the better movement.

  • @joelmishkin4545
    @joelmishkin4545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I recently traded up for the reed green model and it is an astonishingly beautiful watch. Your review was right on point and I can't think of a better dive watch for the price point. Furthermore the fact that it's not a Rolex means that authorized dealers are more willing to work with clients on a purchase price. So I think it's a win-win. And yes, too bad they didn't show the movement. I'm really not certain why they did that.

  • @drewsleyy3836
    @drewsleyy3836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally saw this one in person today, alongside offerings from nearly every major brand + Rolex etc - absolutely stunning. By far one of the most attractive watches in the store, and is now on my personal list

  • @ccw5886
    @ccw5886 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not ‘ underrated’ at all just understated and high horology. Im so glad this piece remains under the radar!

  • @BeckVMH
    @BeckVMH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your positioning of this GO diver, you’re spot on.

  • @timmanion7459
    @timmanion7459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    After being a Rolex Submariner owner for decades, I bought a Sea-Q , 43mm, a couple of years ago. I ended up selling it after about 6 months. I couldn't get used to the dial . It's almost hard to put my finger on , but there just seemed to be something unbalanced about the dial every time I looked at it . No question that it's an extremely well made watch . Just found that it wasn't for me . Great video tho . Nice to see Glashutte getting some love .

    • @DeeKay1911
      @DeeKay1911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sometimes it's all about feeling and it doesn't always end up in a good way

    • @MrCROBosanceros
      @MrCROBosanceros 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those Arabic Numerals are bothering me, they are too big and there are too many of them.

    • @jpdemer5
      @jpdemer5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The big date window is polarizing: Either you love it, or you hate it. I'm in the former camp, but I can understand how annoying it is to other people.
      Very German of G.O. to put practical utility above symmetry and popular aesthetics. It's even more of an enthusiast's watch than the 39.5 version.

  • @joeschlicht
    @joeschlicht 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With the exception of the date placement (I wish it were more outward like the vintage piece it portrays) this might be one of the best looking dive watches to my eyes. I love the classic 4 and 5 digit subs, but I'd take this over any 6 digit reference any day. Beautiful diver and great video.

  • @nestorarodriguez2845
    @nestorarodriguez2845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s certainly a stunning watch, but for the money they ask I think they have to increase the power reserve up to 60 hrs at least. Also opening the case back would add sweetness to the deal.

  • @hunterphan5506
    @hunterphan5506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve tried this in person and it is a beautiful watch. For me, there are only two negatives, the 40-hr power reserve and the the polished center links, which could show scratches easily. The rest of the watch is perfect.

    • @horstpruffa
      @horstpruffa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, the bracelet doesn’t taper. Which for me is a big negative.

    • @johndavolta3124
      @johndavolta3124 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@horstpruffa what does "taper" mean?

  • @73maf53
    @73maf53 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Stunning watch

  • @vincentchampion8986
    @vincentchampion8986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love it. Just wish it had the display case back like the panoramic date version.

  • @MrSaadmubarak
    @MrSaadmubarak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I prefer the size of this one, but the case back and date from it's bigger brother.

  • @BHNEOH
    @BHNEOH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Should or must have the exhibition case back. Missing out big time closing up such a beautifully decorated movement.

    • @kevinprince89
      @kevinprince89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I feel like there should be a law that states all mechanical watches should have an exhibition case back. So sad when they cover it up

    • @sidewinderxx
      @sidewinderxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      they lost so much business for not showing the movement. I'd own one now if it was exhibition like the big brother

    • @TruckeeDoggo
      @TruckeeDoggo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Exhibition case back is NOT worth it, as it usually makes the case thicker. That’s what happened with the new Black Bay 58. Solid case backs are good enough for Rolex, they should be good enough for GO

    • @forsweld
      @forsweld 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Off to see the green version tomorrow and if it looks as good as the blue, I will buy it. Have a Rolex, so this is a great addition to the collection. Love GO!

    • @theaussiewhinger
      @theaussiewhinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It is a shame. Sapphire doesnt really add much thickness at all. The reason a closed caseback is fine for Rolex is because their movements are nowhere near as beautiful as this. This is high horology. Totally different concept.

  • @tdaveniii
    @tdaveniii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love these. To me, they are so, so much more classy than Rolex, Omega and Tudor. Going to try on this and the Panorama Date this weekend and pull the trigger on whichever I like better. I've been pining for months. I actually don't like that the center portion of the bracelet is polished; for that reason, I'll be getting either a cloth or rubber strap.

    • @yankeesandgiants1886
      @yankeesandgiants1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. Get the cloth or rubber strap. Great watch. You can get one from a dealer for under $9K

  • @viperracing2889
    @viperracing2889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    These videos are of insanely high quality. They are like luxory watches themselves.

    • @Mile-long-list
      @Mile-long-list 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your spelling is quite luxurious

    • @viperracing2889
      @viperracing2889 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mile-long-list English isn't my native language.

  • @drzaius844
    @drzaius844 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love everything about this, even the brushed end links. I don't understand the need so many men feel to dress up like a fictional British superspy from the '60s.

    • @paulbelopolsky7460
      @paulbelopolsky7460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I assume you’re referring to the Seamaster Diver 300. I couldn’t care less about the Bond connection. I just think it’s a great watch and an amazing value for the price. I’m sure most owners feel the same.

  • @robertmuller5685
    @robertmuller5685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love the two tone Panorama Date!

    • @yankeesandgiants1886
      @yankeesandgiants1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed. It's amazing looking. I settled for the black dial Panorama because of the price difference and I don't know if I could pull off wearing such a beautiful watch. The grey dial is really nice with the gold accents.

  • @MP-iz7tf
    @MP-iz7tf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful watch. Thanks for the brand background.

  • @1018Frankie
    @1018Frankie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Definitely a much better watch than the cache brand(Rolex) that is not even available when you want it! As you said, it’s a watch for the enthusiast and I will say the connoisseur, being a tall and big guy I will go for the Sea Q Panorama Date because I’m a fan of the big date and I want to see the movement! Nice video, keep the good work my friend!

  • @bruceleroy8063
    @bruceleroy8063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    My kind of dial. There's a lot of open blue with nowhere to hide.

  • @Spit87
    @Spit87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really didn't like this watch when I first saw it but the more I see it, the more it grows on me big time

  • @anthonystevens8683
    @anthonystevens8683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A great review Teddy. I love this watch but as you state the price is for the enthusiast and I'm OK with that. I assume production volumes are low compared to some perceived luxury brands so that would explain the higher price point to a degree. The lack of a display case back while being a nice addition for me is certainly not a deal breaker if I was in the market. I have a few watches with display case backs and I'll look at the movement when I put the watch on and often not look at it again until I take it off. That bracelet is a brilliant addition to the watch, the on the fly micro adjustment is fantastic.

  • @paulbennett6729
    @paulbennett6729 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love it, blue and green itirations. Unfortunately the black dial is not as nice as the 58 black dial. The blue dial however is much nicer than the blue 58. Bracelet is in a totally different league mind. Does double the price equate to double the pleasure?
    Expensive if you want the black dial. Blue justifies price better. Green vs hulk, no brainer considering hulks price.....Only my humble opinion guys.
    Great review Teddy as we've come to expect

  • @CataVlad21
    @CataVlad21 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd tweak a few things about it, but it's such a stunning looking and impecably built piece that even someone as perfectionist as i am can only wish he'll once get to own! Unless something more appealing comes out by the time i can afford it 🙂
    It ticks soooo many boxes in my book, and the 4-5 things i'd change are so insignificant compared to the general value of the watch that i wouldnt think twice to buy it if i had 10k usd to throw on it right now! My biggest complaint would probably be not having at least a 80h power reserve with a gauge on the dial, and that kinda says it all about how much i love this watch!
    Thank you for a nice, detailed video about it, Teddy! I had noticed this piece a few weeks ago and im so happy to see it caught your attention as well!
    Cheers!

  • @triumph2013
    @triumph2013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    On my wishlist 👊

  • @YuhNinja
    @YuhNinja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I was waiting for the price, because that watch is beautiful. 😅 $10,000 yikes. Can't afford that. Sorry I'm poor.

    • @taonguyen5174
      @taonguyen5174 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can easily get with a discount.

    • @YuhNinja
      @YuhNinja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@taonguyen5174 Yeah? A $9,000 discount? Cuz that's all I could afford.

  • @curtbrown7718
    @curtbrown7718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am curious as to why you did not address the significant distortion of the numbers as seen through the crystal.

  • @Wa-wk6qk
    @Wa-wk6qk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    absolutely amazing! Love the green one

  • @stevedunning7367
    @stevedunning7367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for a Glashütte Original review! The blue dial Pano Senator Moon Phase is a watch I’d love to own one day. Nice to see another option from G O. But the closed case back is a big disappointment.

  • @craigdlazarus
    @craigdlazarus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    All class here Teddy! Keep 'em coming....

  • @nickcapretta5481
    @nickcapretta5481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice watch. GO is underrated and a great brand. Other divers with fantastic finished movements come from Blancpain.

  • @Rev1RN2
    @Rev1RN2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Teddy,
    As always, fantastic video. I most appreciated the back history you highlighted here which to this consumer is what makes G.O. worthy of my attention. It's the stories we watchheads tell when someone notices our wrist that makes this hobby so enjoyable. As you've said countless times, "watches are conversation pieces." I'd wear this brand like a boss. Lastly, I couldn't agree more. It's the under the radar brands with either rich or new histories that keeps me searching and coming back for more tick tock. Thank you for the great horological content. Monty

  • @GeeMood
    @GeeMood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Glashütte Original SeaQ Panorama Date is certainly a grail watch of mine.

    • @japd7897
      @japd7897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The grey and yellow gold is gorgeus.

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review and GO is definitely beautiful, thanks, Teddy.

  • @agnarsidhu7722
    @agnarsidhu7722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are a lot of things I like with this one, the dial particularly! I do however which the integration of the bracelet looked a bit more "thoughtful"

  • @TheCharlesAtoz
    @TheCharlesAtoz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is outside of my price range, but, I might get one anyway new or from the secondary market. Nice video Teddy.

  • @444slowitdown
    @444slowitdown 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love the brand.. have a dozen vintage pieces and 1 a spezichron diver blue bezel and i love each and everyone..

  • @earthenjadis8199
    @earthenjadis8199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The problem I have with this watch is that the 1969 Spezimatic that this watch is based off of is a copy of a popular big numeral design from a lot of affordable French dive watches of the mid 1960s. I'm thinking of brands like SOUS MARINE, SEFICO, EZOR and AURORE, to name a few.
    So you're paying Rolex level prices for a luxury German watch that is imitating affordable French divers. These days, if you like that look and can stand a Miyota movement, you can check out microbrands like LE FORBAN and WOLBROOK to get it at a fraction of the price and probably more in the spirit of the original divers it was inspired from.

  • @matthoffman6962
    @matthoffman6962 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful watch! Great video. You should do a watchbox/storage video next!

  • @mannycalavera2335
    @mannycalavera2335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love everything about it except the font on the bezel. And the price.

  • @garethedwards1149
    @garethedwards1149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow what a dial!

  • @wondertanguy
    @wondertanguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this dial

  • @natusMCMII
    @natusMCMII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think I dig this more than a Sub for example...plus you can actually go into a Glashütte boutique and walk out with this beauty immediately

  • @StopFear
    @StopFear 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When will we learn who is the winner of the giveaway?

  • @paulhiggins8774
    @paulhiggins8774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank god at least one watch maker uses numbers for it's sub watches, I love it and can even put up with the Date @ 3 with that dial, would I buy one, yes but a bit out of my price range

  • @giuseppecavana3426
    @giuseppecavana3426 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of The best diver around The seven seas!

  • @brians7292
    @brians7292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think I like the one with the black leather band better….. what does than run again cost wise I missed it? Great video as well and well done as always.

  • @deedee8568
    @deedee8568 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Glashutte would struggle to make a piece that wasn't elegant, composed and classy.

    • @zillsburyy1
      @zillsburyy1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      nothing like a seamaster

    • @keshavvikram3397
      @keshavvikram3397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I disagree many of their pieces apart from this and the senator sixites are too big and thick

  • @UltimateAccuracy
    @UltimateAccuracy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Display case back + Fully brushed bracelet + Black/Charcoal dial with the white gold applied indices of the blue model.
    Then it would be perfect for me. Currently discounts run at 15-20% off RRP.

  • @Tokyo_Views
    @Tokyo_Views 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lovely time piece. Thanks for the review

  • @steven821130
    @steven821130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Teddy, do you think this 39.5mm version is still too large for 6 inch (15 cm) wrist? I like the design of seaQ so much, but I've quite tiny wrists...

    • @riojimatsuoka
      @riojimatsuoka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It depends on shape of wrist. I have a small but flat wrist and can pull off larger than 40mm in most cases. If your wrist is small and round, it can be problematic.

    • @steven821130
      @steven821130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@riojimatsuoka Thanks. My wrist circumference is small, but its shape is quite flat.

  • @arkajyotijha3291
    @arkajyotijha3291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I saw the glashutte showroom once when I had a layover in an airport in Germany (can't recollect which one). Knew their name before, but just loved the watches they had on display there!

    • @jancovanderwesthuizen8070
      @jancovanderwesthuizen8070 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Could it have been Zurich? Not in Germany of course but I believe they have a boutique there

    • @j.burgess4459
      @j.burgess4459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The prices of Glashütte Original make me smile. As Teddy says, it was a nationalized concern known as GUB Glashütte (Generell Uhren Betrieb Glashütte?) during the days of Communist East Germany. I believe the dial of the SeaQ is very closely based on a dive watch they made around 1970... Neither their price or performance set too many pulses racing back then. But Capitalism has cured them!😁

    • @arkajyotijha3291
      @arkajyotijha3291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jancovanderwesthuizen8070 Could be. Was a layover, so I don't recall exactly which airport it was. Germany came to mind, since well.. glashutte

  • @ManVsWatch
    @ManVsWatch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So beautiful watch ! Thanks for the video ! :)

  • @kevinmccalister8197
    @kevinmccalister8197 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been on a waitlist for a BB58 for a while now. If I had the money, i'd get this watch.

  • @NYGuy2000
    @NYGuy2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb watch! Great presentation!

  • @davidrodriguezc3724
    @davidrodriguezc3724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The good thing with these relative "unknown brands" or not mainstream is, people wont want to steal it from you hahaha

  • @gynat5968
    @gynat5968 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tried out the SeaQ while visiting Hamburg last spring. On the wrist it became apparent the SeaQ was a fashion watch masquerading as dive watch. A very nice watch to be sure, but a bit cartoonish in appearance as a tool watch. 14.4k US? Not for me, but perhaps for thee. I'd rather a BP or Rolex if going tool or an actual dress watch if not.

    • @Rodisflawless
      @Rodisflawless ปีที่แล้ว

      Incorrect.

    • @gynat5968
      @gynat5968 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rodisflawless how so? I'd be interested in hearing your experiences with it. Sailing, surfing, diving... It seemed less robust than my seadweller, more of a desk diver, though admittedly after a cursory try on in the Bucherer showroom .

    • @fj7509
      @fj7509 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The watch retails for just under 10K USD, and you can get it on the secondary market for 7K. The Panodate is the more expensive model, but it still retails for 12K and 9K on the secondary market which is under what you listed.
      If you go with the strap and not the metal bracelet, the secondary market price is 6.5K.
      I had a chance to compare it next to the Submariner at Bucherer NYC, and you WILL notice the difference just by holding it. Build quality and finishing is a step above the Submariner, it teeters on the edge of 'high horology.' The entire movement is hand engraved and beautifully decorated, and you get one of the highest quality casebacks in the industry. It's also very nice to see production number, and since this was a 2018-2019 release, you can still get production numbers under 5K, compared to the Submariner which is in the millions by now.
      I think paying 10K for it might be a bit too much considering where other 10K watches are placed, but 6.5K-7K is an absolute no brainer. When you consider the fact that the Omega Planet Ocean collection retails for more than this and come with mass produced movements with parts that may not be in house, machine finishing, and not put together by actual artisans, I think this watch has an incredible stance in the marketplace.
      I already own 2 Rolex I purchased at an AD, and after considering the Sub, I plan on picking one of these up instead.

    • @gynat5968
      @gynat5968 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fj7509 Interesting - I was quoted 14.5k at Bucherer Hamburg Spring of 2023 for a new steel bracelet 39.5 mm model. The saleswoman was quite stunning - so
      Having owned a SeaDweller and an Explorer previously (gifted the Explorer to my dad) those models grooved the idea of a tool watch for me. The SeaQ, when i tried it on felt more dress than tool watch and the competing fonts also were a bit jarring initially. I did like the watch overall (especially the blue dial model), but the quoted price took it out of the running. I will take another look at Bucherer NY next week.
      Thinking back i wonder if it was simply to refined to meet my idea of a watch that will be worn sailing and diving 4-5 months a year? The SD took the use well, but it was built like a tank. Thanks for your thoughtful response, I will definitely give the SeaQ another look.

  • @Valera_Scotland
    @Valera_Scotland 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunately it's a price thing. Being on an average income means that if I decide to own a "luxury" watch, it will involve at least 2-3 years of saving ... So I would need a more versatile piece like the Explorer - which will work in most situations... However, between this SeaQ and the new Sub no date ( at grey market prices of 20-25k) - I would definitely go for the SeaQ. Absolutely love the look of it, the arrow hand, the blue, the markers... Stunning

  • @chubbymonkey6604
    @chubbymonkey6604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this watch. But I think I would probably lean towards the Nomos Ahoi Ref 561 instead. A bit different for sure since the GO is a true dive watch and the Nomos lacks a timing bezel, but I think the price increase for this compared with the Nomos would be hard for me to stomach for a watch with similar applications. If the Glashutte had a sapphire caseback however...

  • @knz1950
    @knz1950 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the SeaQ. ... it is a grail watch for me. I want one they don't make - Yet - I want a 42mm-44mm no date with a sapphire display case back. I have 2 GUB Speziamatics, 2 long island Rosylins a Wolbrook and a Seestern in the SeaQ design style and love them all. Just waiting for GO to make the one I want. PS I don't "Jones" for a Rolex Sub of any flavor.

  • @cagataysucu439
    @cagataysucu439 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That dial, numerals, perfect size diver for my 6.3 inches wrist... This watch has to be mine some day! 😄

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Perfect for your wrist size.

    • @taonguyen5174
      @taonguyen5174 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm probably 6.1" and fits amazing

  • @mdunawaym
    @mdunawaym 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm with you. I would prefer a lesser known brand than one of the big names.

  • @thomasallen3818
    @thomasallen3818 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know the Black Bay 58 gets mentioned all the time by just about every TH-camr, but I didn’t like it as much as I liked the Pelagos. I liked the Pelagos enough to go ahead and buy it. It’s as comfortable as either of my Rolexes and is lighter, because of the titanium. It’s become my go to watch, over the dozen other divers in my collection.

  • @patrickcannady2066
    @patrickcannady2066 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    GO has some of the best dials in the business. The movements are pretty great, too.

  • @mortezajaberi1745
    @mortezajaberi1745 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    teddy do you review
    west end watch ?

  • @ΕυάγγελοςΠλεξίδας
    @ΕυάγγελοςΠλεξίδας ปีที่แล้ว

    I am waiting for GO to put an exibishion case back and then the watch will worth to buy...

  • @TrumanBurbankFE
    @TrumanBurbankFE 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    SeaQ Panorama Datum for just a little more but more inclined to get a Seventies flyback Chrono with cushion case and a sunburst blue dial. GO is pricey and soft so better get it on the grey market or second hand. Funny that I was more intrigued by the clean design of the Mühle.

  • @shawnlavigne9069
    @shawnlavigne9069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think it's the best luxury diver on the market right now. Or, at least, I like it the best.

  • @tissinakkikaivo
    @tissinakkikaivo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video once again Teddy. You’ve basically reviewed my top two favorites this week (aqua terra and the SeaQ). I know you already made a video of the Zenith Defy Classic, but how about reviewing the skeleton version? Preferably the ceramic one haha.
    Take care

  • @dr885
    @dr885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where can I buy the 39mm diver in this video¿

  • @classicnickpics465
    @classicnickpics465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m not sure it’s underrated, I just think there’s a few reasons it isn’t as popular as perhaps it should be...
    1) it’s pretty expensive for a diver
    2) it’s a high horological brand that doesn’t hold the same brand cache as Rolex or Patek in the eyes of a lot of its target audience
    3) it looks a little too similar to a Longines Hydroconquest (not that I don’t respect that watch...but it’s 15% of the price)
    I love it though and would buy it if I could afford to.

    • @vianouche1
      @vianouche1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Finally a comment that is not "Better than a Rolex, we understand better, we know"... thanks

  • @fire_watch7735
    @fire_watch7735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video and nice watch but there is one in my watch group that someone is trying to sell that is nearly new and it is plummeting in value🙄 Already fallen 35% and no interest yet. Most well priced watches in our group go within a day and this has already been for sale for weeks so be very careful when you buy one and be sure that you want to keep it or you'll take a significant bath. Cheers

  • @michaelo6870
    @michaelo6870 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice watch. But it looks like Glashütte took the hands and indices from the 43.2mm version (I'm not sure)... so the proportions don't seem quite right to me...

  • @helluminati
    @helluminati 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Teddy! my favorite TH-camr💃

  • @cedshred1676
    @cedshred1676 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love GO! I agree that this should have a sapphire caseback, as should any watch with a beautiful movement. As others have noted, Rolex movements are not worth looking at, so they thankfully hide them. The sapphire caseback Tudors are rightfully mocked, as the Kenissi movements are less attractive even than Rolex movements.

  • @kaunas888
    @kaunas888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To me for a simple steel watch from a revived, relatively unknown brand, which should be trying harder, this price is quite dear. It is more than a Bancpain or an Omega which are much more established.

    • @jrgenminichen3815
      @jrgenminichen3815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Established for whom? This brand is not for everybody, and that’s great I think!

  • @Underfighter73
    @Underfighter73 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd definitely pick this over the Submariner!

  • @matt4590
    @matt4590 ปีที่แล้ว

    That dial 😍 That price 😵

  • @rogexpo9430
    @rogexpo9430 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review Teddy. Beautiful watch but a little out of my price range.

  • @Yos115
    @Yos115 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glashutte senator excellence is super underrated

  • @andreaiacolina
    @andreaiacolina 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is a really interesting brand, very underrated in my opinion. I'd really like to add one of their pieces to my collection in the future.

  • @prod.bynil-oh7440
    @prod.bynil-oh7440 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its really stunning

  • @Mile-long-list
    @Mile-long-list 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That's cheaper than the aquis. Not the 400, the sw 200 version - it's better regulated as well and looks just as good what's not to like ! The burr on the bottom of the case is a little sad though due to the blanking process it looks like it's not quite finished and needs a radius added to the edge or a deburr

    • @Nefville
      @Nefville 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think this one starts at around $9,000.

    • @Mile-long-list
      @Mile-long-list 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nefville 2499 retail. You can get it for much less than that

    • @Nefville
      @Nefville 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mile-long-list That explains a lot. I must have been looking at the big date version. Well for that price it changes things. Thanks.

  • @RJSearson12345
    @RJSearson12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have no idea why I should be interested in watching this video so props on the thumbnail I guess