@@RealUSC Not to mention a healthily large population and industry. Plus gotta factor in they had to boat most of their stuff across oceans.. just ask current day Russia about logistics nightmares just across the boarder.. and the difficulty taking on determined defenders...
@@nepsyasudra3262 exactly because Logistically speaking it would be very hard to invade the Mainland United States Because there is only two ways for a land invasion Canada and Mexico and the biggest issue of those two is Canada mainly because of the size of the border You would have to have a blue water navy that is more powerful and bigger than the United States Not many countries have the capability to have a blue water navy so there is a lot of factors into defense As well as fighting a defense war is a whole lot easier than an offensive one
This is how we should’ve sided. We should’ve gone against the British and French and their ally, Belgium, who was genociding millions in the Congo at the time. We stood for liberty, but we helped the wrong people win. Sadly, this led to ww2 and the Cold War, communist China, and todays world tensions. German empire wouldn’t have surrendered this fast or be beaten like this irl with American material support and naval support against the British navy. F to pay respects to traditional Germany irl anyway.
Þe Ottomans were genociding þe Armenians. And þey did it so horrifically, historians looking over þe war created a whole new word just to describe it. Neiþer side in WWI was þe "right" side. Also, þe Qing Dynasty was already on þe way out. And if you're blaming þe Entente for þe Republic of China being shit in its first incarnation (and led by a guy from þe Qing Dynasty), þat was almost as inevitable as Spain breaking into civil war during þe Interwar Period.
@@Demonic_Culture_Nut The rise of communist China was highly influenced and caused by the Soviets, who only came to power because Germany felt it was necessary to send Lenin to Russia to get them out of the war. And I forgot about the ottomans. Those bastards. Although they were only called in to help against Russia and maybe in a timeline with American support, Germany wouldn’t feel it necessary to do so. No side was absolutely right, but Britain and France combined did dominate like half the world and were allied to king Leopold of Belgium, who was literally cutting hands off in the Congo. Nobody was good, but there is some who may have been better.
It makes sense they went for the british since they spoke the same language and at the start they didn't even want to join the war till Germany decided to do unrestricted submarine warfare.
Empirial germany and Austria-Hungary were just as bad if not worst than the Entente. Besides if Germany won WW1 the socialist would have taken power anyways in a lot of the same countries and in france as well as britan so youre entire argument falls apart.
@@misohari6789 Yes but France and England never would have been able to start a second Great War because of a lack of population and industry compared to the Germans and never ever would’ve gotten as far as them. The Holocaust also never would’ve happened because the Germans were not absolutely crazy and genocidal, meaning there’d be no Israel-Palestine crisis. Also 4+ million Ukrainians wouldn’t have died in a genocide by Stalin and would probably instead be semi or mostly independent and very likely get independence in the future. India probably would’ve been let go by the world powers much, much sooner as well, maybe even right after the Great War, as no one would be able to control an extremely restless population there.
The ending was quite odd
How the hell central powers even not win
Germany surrendered yet they where in paris
Wtf how is posible Central Power no win???
Oh yes... "IA"
Allied victory in Europe, Central powers victory in America - America annexes it's neighbours.
USA holding off the British, French, Italians, Mexicans and Russians was definitely something
Very inaccurate even for HOI4 lol
@@ToobzNightmare I mean if every American fought....
(We do have more guns than people soooo)
@@RealUSC Not to mention a healthily large population and industry. Plus gotta factor in they had to boat most of their stuff across oceans.. just ask current day Russia about logistics nightmares just across the boarder.. and the difficulty taking on determined defenders...
@@nepsyasudra3262 exactly because
Logistically speaking it would be very hard to invade the Mainland United States
Because there is only two ways for a land invasion
Canada and Mexico and the biggest issue of those two is Canada mainly because of the size of the border
You would have to have a blue water navy that is more powerful and bigger than the United States
Not many countries have the capability to have a blue water navy so there is a lot of factors into defense
As well as fighting a defense war is a whole lot easier than an offensive one
@@ToobzNightmare It’s realistic, a land invasion of the US would be next to impossible even 100 years ago
This is how we should’ve sided. We should’ve gone against the British and French and their ally, Belgium, who was genociding millions in the Congo at the time. We stood for liberty, but we helped the wrong people win. Sadly, this led to ww2 and the Cold War, communist China, and todays world tensions. German empire wouldn’t have surrendered this fast or be beaten like this irl with American material support and naval support against the British navy. F to pay respects to traditional Germany irl anyway.
Þe Ottomans were genociding þe Armenians. And þey did it so horrifically, historians looking over þe war created a whole new word just to describe it. Neiþer side in WWI was þe "right" side.
Also, þe Qing Dynasty was already on þe way out. And if you're blaming þe Entente for þe Republic of China being shit in its first incarnation (and led by a guy from þe Qing Dynasty), þat was almost as inevitable as Spain breaking into civil war during þe Interwar Period.
@@Demonic_Culture_Nut The rise of communist China was highly influenced and caused by the Soviets, who only came to power because Germany felt it was necessary to send Lenin to Russia to get them out of the war. And I forgot about the ottomans. Those bastards. Although they were only called in to help against Russia and maybe in a timeline with American support, Germany wouldn’t feel it necessary to do so. No side was absolutely right, but Britain and France combined did dominate like half the world and were allied to king Leopold of Belgium, who was literally cutting hands off in the Congo. Nobody was good, but there is some who may have been better.
It makes sense they went for the british since they spoke the same language and at the start they didn't even want to join the war till Germany decided to do unrestricted submarine warfare.
Empirial germany and Austria-Hungary were just as bad if not worst than the Entente. Besides if Germany won WW1 the socialist would have taken power anyways in a lot of the same countries and in france as well as britan so youre entire argument falls apart.
@@misohari6789 Yes but France and England never would have been able to start a second Great War because of a lack of population and industry compared to the Germans and never ever would’ve gotten as far as them. The Holocaust also never would’ve happened because the Germans were not absolutely crazy and genocidal, meaning there’d be no Israel-Palestine crisis. Also 4+ million Ukrainians wouldn’t have died in a genocide by Stalin and would probably instead be semi or mostly independent and very likely get independence in the future. India probably would’ve been let go by the world powers much, much sooner as well, maybe even right after the Great War, as no one would be able to control an extremely restless population there.
New map style looks cool
When are you gonna do NATO V.S The Warsaw Pact V.S [modern day] Chinese alliance like i asked you ?
This is totally not tampered with
Subtitles are good
USA is so strong!why German surrender ?
What about CSTO vs the world Or Slt decolonisation
why are the allies on steroids?
Get Italy to join central
USA Supports the britisch with staff with Out that the british never hast chance
Where is Soviet Union? Not true Germany surrender so fast, it should be France
Germany surrender so fast because Soviet Union has never formed.
F por México