Hi Alan, at 7:40 you discuss democratic socialism and social democracy. What is the difference between these two? are they the same? and thank you for the great videos, they've been carrying me through my course!!
Democratic Socialism results in a fully socialist state and economy but gets there through elections not revolution. Social democracy accepts capitalism but looks to redistribute wealth, set up a generous welfare state and nationalise some industries
Your ML state is really more of a caricature. In reality all developing and modernizing economies have authoritarian leaders as was the case with the SU and China. Also, they were necessary because of the revolutions, world wars, and civil wars within their countries. In addition, they had to keep aggressive and hostile countries at bay with a strong military. They also had to subdue the capitalists and subversives from within. All of those factors really paint a different picture of the SU and Chinese states and parties.
Dissapointed that the A Level spec doesn't consider the influence of libertarian and anarchist socialists. Thinkers like Malatesta, kropotkin and Bookchin would all be considered socialist but believe in a highly limited, highly democratic state, emphasising the needs of worker self management and bottom-up power in the creation of socialism. Not an issue with your presentation, it's just that many revolutionary socialists completely disagree with the idea of a strong state. Nice video though, good revision tool.
Used this to revise for my A-Level Politics exam. Great informative video - thank you.
Best of luck!
Anyone else here the night before their a level exam?
Omfg yes dying
Try the morning before
On the morning of the exam 😵💫
very helpful alan x
Hi Alan, at 7:40 you discuss democratic socialism and social democracy. What is the difference between these two? are they the same? and thank you for the great videos, they've been carrying me through my course!!
Democratic Socialism results in a fully socialist state and economy but gets there through elections not revolution. Social democracy accepts capitalism but looks to redistribute wealth, set up a generous welfare state and nationalise some industries
Cheers Alan king
yes now alan. helping out big time mate xx
Happy to help
Your ML state is really more of a caricature. In reality all developing and modernizing economies have authoritarian leaders as was the case with the SU and China. Also, they were necessary because of the revolutions, world wars, and civil wars within their countries. In addition, they had to keep aggressive and hostile countries at bay with a strong military. They also had to subdue the capitalists and subversives from within. All of those factors really paint a different picture of the SU and Chinese states and parties.
this is so helpful! thank you!!
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you sir
This video is amazing ❤️ just like you
Thank you!
Dissapointed that the A Level spec doesn't consider the influence of libertarian and anarchist socialists. Thinkers like Malatesta, kropotkin and Bookchin would all be considered socialist but believe in a highly limited, highly democratic state, emphasising the needs of worker self management and bottom-up power in the creation of socialism. Not an issue with your presentation, it's just that many revolutionary socialists completely disagree with the idea of a strong state.
Nice video though, good revision tool.