Men's 110m Hurdles Final | World Athletics Championships Oregon 2022
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2023
- ⭐️ Follow us on Twitter - / worldathletics ⭐️
⭐️ Follow us on Facebook - / worldathletics ⭐️
⭐️ Follow us on Instagram - / worldathlet. . ⭐️
⭐️ Follow us on TikTok - / worldathletics ⭐️
Make sure you subscribe for athletics highlights, interviews with the athletes, training tips and more! - กีฬา
It's not often you see an 11 minute long 110 hurdles final
Not common for hurdles, but Jon Drummond's 100m protest was much more spectacular. Such a memorable moment.
I ran the 110m high hurdles in high school. This race is really special, challenging, and exciting. These guys are world-class of course.
One of the most controversial races ever
For a reason, Allen was robbed
The electronic starting blocks have ruined the sprints. The OFFICIALS are the ones who should decide a false start, not some stupid piece of technology.
@@saragrant9749it’s not the tech it’s the rule that says you can’t start within a tenth of a second after the gun goes off
@@thederpyturnip6330 no, it IS the technology. I have worked with those pieces of garbage starting blocks and they are a giant pain in the arse. At least once during a season you’ll get one that malfunctions. As I stated, we did just fine for DECADES without them, relying on highly skilled officials to start the sprints with nary a single issue whatsoever. Now we have to be “fancy” and utilize a piece of highly unreliable technical equipment to supposedly get the job done more accurately. I say supposedly because there are a lot of instances where it truly ISN’T more accurate.
New fear unlocked: reacting too fast 💀💀💀
Yes World athletics and the fcking rules. All officials involved should be banned and that 0.1 rule is not even scientifically proven
☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
Good start rt 0.099 and NEW WR 12.73 SEC
@@Allblue1the officials are NOT the ones who came up with the rules. Try blaming those who are actually responsible for these electronic starting blocks, the manufacturers and the IAAF leaders for deciding to take it OUT of the official’s hands and expertise.
I was there. The DQ sucked all of the energy out of the stadium. Something was off with the timers in Eugene, that much is sure.
Unfortunately Devon Allen Was FaLSestart was DQ !
Didn't he false start before?
@@All_for_one100 in the heats he had simliar reaction
@@All_for_one100 no he was exact on the 0.1 rule with the same reaction time and he won the semis
Not really. The rules of athletics are so dum
Not to take away Grant Holloway's win but the disqualication of Daven and injury of parchment ruined the energy aftwards.
Hope Budapest offers a different scenario
No lies here 💯
@@onileowocomfort1805 cause we all knew if the circumstances were right it was going to be an epic battle between the top three
Knowing they were a good jn the semi finals
I believe grant would have finished 2nd behind Parchment or 3rd behind Parchment and Allen
"The 100 ms limit is based on research from the 1990s in which the total response time of eight male Finnish sprinters was investigated [2]. The average response time between the start signal and reaching a value of 110% of the force exerted on the starting blocks in the ‘ready’ position was 121 ms with a standard deviation (typical variation) of 14 ms for the front leg and 119 ms with a standard deviation of 11 ms for the rear leg (Figure 1).
A limit of 100 ms should, on the basis of these results, ensure that most correct starts are not incorrectly labeled false, while most real false starts are disqualified. However, no elite sprinter was investigated in this study. It is possible that elite sprinters react faster than sub elite sprinters, so the lower limit of 100 ms may not be correct for use at international top matches. Furthermore, the response time in this study was not measured in a race situation, while athletes in a race situation may respond faster due to increased arousal and motivation. The question that arises is therefore whether it is possible to respond to the start signal within 100 ms."
That rule is so dumb ffs
First the number one ranked runner gets an injury right before the race, then the number two in the world gets disqualified for basically being good at something that he's supposed to be good at. I feel really bad for Devon Allen here.
This race still stings. Allen was in WR shape, and he even intended on breaking it here. The technology is great, but the rules behind it are just dumb. If he didn’t break the WR, at least the sweep would have been possible.
when i saw this i was pissed , The whole point is to react fast and win the race
But if u react too fast is a disqualification!?!?!
Well obviously you don’t want to cheat but he was literally .001 or sum like that off. That’s such a small margin of error and I don’t think he should have been dqd, maybe a warning at the most because it didn’t seem obvious
i agree that it’s a shame he got DQed for that but you need to set a hard limit you can’t not dq just because he was close
They should have officiation by Video its so obvious he didn't false start
@@timotheesamazingchannel3721the issue people have is the tiny margin- determined by a ridiculous piece of technology rather than highly skilled certified officials. The decision should be made by THEM, that is their purpose for being the chosen starters.
Well done to Asier Martínez. He is from a tiny town in Navarra. He makes me be proud to be Spanish.
Holloway and Cunningham great work!
Thank you for sharing this video
💯
Yes… almost a year later! I could edit it myself in a week…
Like here if that stupid rule has to change.
I don't care about computers and cameras. That is a fair start by all. 😢
Allen's DQ was a set-up... He would've won. 🤩
I heard was The Beafore Gun !
He would not lmao
I always loves this guys energy Grant holloway
A disqualyfing Problem start ?
Ask from recalling Question !
Not letting allen run under protest was bullshit. As well, His reaction time most likely really is Under a tenth of a second. The wrong kind of people are running things
Didn't realise that there were people booing after Holloway won
Grant needs to give the flat 100m a try. He might surprise himself . Gail Divers used to run both events and was successful at it
Devin Allen was robbed, if you react after the gun regardless of whether it’s a guess or reaction time it should be legal because you still went after the gun.
I disagree. If you start 0.01s after the gun, you obviously anticipated because the nervous system cannot transmit the information in such a short period of time.
It's normal to set a minimum period of time between the gun and the licit start, otherwise some atlets would take their chance by starting before hearing the gun, especially on 100m and 110m hurdles.
@@pierrek5260 Wrong. Hes a highly trained sprinter at the elite level lol. His brain is exactly wired to react to that gun. He's done it who knows how many time bro. There is 0 advantage when you have reacted after the gun.
@@pierrek5260 I mean, chances are low and the risk to reward ratio is also not favorable. And even if you succeed the advantage would be so minimal.
what? then how would that be fair for those who react to the gun?
Anybody talking about the kind of sub title that says men’s 100m hurdles 💀
American Superior Super Athlete !
Not long ago there used to be the 2 false start rule in which if an athlete false started it was charged initially to the entire field. If there was another false start following that, then that specific athlete was disqualified. I feel we should go back to that rule again for maybe a FINALS of a particular sprint event. Fans pay a lot of money at elite level track meets to see their favorite elite level athletes compete. Yes there's a lot of pressure and anxiety especially in a finals of a particular sprint event and no one is absolutely perfect. Mistakes are made. By allowing 1 false start for the entire field you alleviate the tension sprinters may have and will allow them to focus so that they don't make that mistake again and it also gives the fans their money's worth to see their favorite athletes compete. I say this b/c in 2011 I went to Daegu to watch Usain Bolt compete in the World Championships 100 meter final. I paid a lot of money including airfare, accommodations, transportation and food only to have him false start out of it. This silly rule is hurting track and field not helping it
Allen From the USA correctly started. Why is he disqualified? It's totally unfair. What a crazy judgement
Because some idiots in the highest level of decision making in IAAF decided to take the decision away from highly skilled certified officials and give it to a stupid piece of electronics.
What reason disqualifies Allen? I think he is the perfect start please share detail.
he started thousandth of a second too early
@@orlandonotflorida9763 how to find out thousands of seconds?
@@sandeepkumar-bj1bk very speedy technology
it would have been a clean sweep in 110 hurdles again if Daven Allen was not disqualified
This one still bugs me. I understand the need for a false start system, I know exactly how it works. But reaction time? And not just reaction time, but by a thousandth? Hell, I'd say we call a +/- .005 if we're going to be so nitpicky. More than that, the fact that we're limiting reaction time in a sport where your time and place are dependent on how quickly you react as much as how fast you run is completely bogus. We should not train people to react to a gun and then penalize them for doing just that. We clearly have the technology to tell when your foot moves on the pad. At no point should we need to be judging how fast you can do that *after* the gun goes off.
And, as a more selfish note from a US track point of view, having Devon Allen in that race would have had trickle down effects that brought more people to watch the sport, more people to join the sport. We are seriously shooting ourselves in the foot on trying to grow track and field.
If +/- .005 of a sec is impossible to catch with the human eye Allen was robbed of a race.
Being disqualified for being a THOUSAND of a second too fast might be the biggest BS in all of Track&Field history
Why no second chance? Or if they know start time and finish time, they can subtract those to see who is best so no need for a gunshot
completely agree... you're playing with people's careers/lifetime goals here... why do the rules need to be so strict?? not only ruining it for the runner themselves, you're ruining it for the fans too... sport is supposed to be entertainment after all!
Get it
Viva Navarra, viva Martínez, viva España.
and what if he did world record of the best reaction time?!?!?! What a shame from judges
They better place the margin of false start somewhere around 0.07 seconds. This 0.1 sec rule is ridiculous.
They just picked him out because they can!
Minha opinião, o atleta americano foi injustiçado.
Records are measured in 1/100". Disqualification for 1/1000" seems pretty nonsensical.
I hope world athletics knows that their dumb DQ rules ruined this event. Oregon 2022 was great but this event was a disappointment. Only ever call back a race if somebody starts BEFORE the gun. If somebody is in the "reaction time window" simply give them a time penalty. Since Devon Allen started 0.001 before the 0.1 second window, add 0.001 to his time at the end. Easy.
it’s not as easy as that
That wouldn't work in races like the 4x400 where it becomes a tactical race. I'd say show a yellow card if it is within the 0.1 (or 0.08 preferably) and red if it's negative
I would say red card if it is under 0.075s. and yellow card if it's between 0.075s and 0.099s
Yeah. According to scientists' studies, the fastest humans can react is 0.082 seconds IIRC. Not 0.1 so it seems kinda uhfair
not a good idea. then you'd essentially be giving people that started early a "perfect" 100ms start.
We shouldn't disqualify athletes for a stupid thing !
What a stupid rule. Penalized for being too fast!!!
Why couldnt he run under protest, noah lyles did it
Do not check only the athletic check the Shooter too
Stupid rule and if the runner protests, just let him run it at the end you do the investigation and determine the results afterwards
so stupid rule.i lost national record for this stupid rule.let the man run
not a genuine race without competitors...
BRING BACK THE YELLOW CARD. ATHLETES WORK TOO HARD TO DQ ON FIRST ERROR
That false start rule exists for a very good reason. A while back it was commonplace for athletes to purposely false start, to play mind games with their competitors. This was considered an unnecessary act of poor sportsmanship and thus the “one and you’re done” rule was instituted. It has leveled the playing field for all running events in the sport.
What needs to be eliminated is the asinine electronic starting blocks. They serve absolutely no purpose other than to take the decision away from highly skilled and supremely experienced officials.
@@saragrant9749 ahhh understood. Thanks for shedding the light
These stupid rules should be challenged in the court of law and un-disqualify that usa guy
What a robbery
So sad for Jamaica - so close to ……and this disappointment
Por sonso queda fuera e irresponsable
Whats wrong ref
One of the most overrated finals ever
Definitely
there is absolutely 0 chances thats a DQ
Watch the video frame by frame and you will see that the athlete in lane 4 lifts his fingers off the line before Allen in lane 3.... ie. starting slightly ahead of Allen.
Perhaps Allen's equipment sent a false signal, but in any case the video illustrates that Allen did not start before everyone else, and therefore did not false start, and should not have been disqualified.
What we have here is adjudicators relying solely on equipment signals without any double check via review of the video footage. We also have a ridiculous rule which, when followed blindly by officials, can result in the very best athletes being disqualified for no good reason.
These events take months to prepare for, and such effort needs to be recognized and not dismissed with such disregard.
No athlete deserves to be disqualified because their reaction is too quick to the start signal, only if their action happens before the start signal.
If they stick to this absurd system, and don't review video footage in such cases, then we are going to get more such unfair disqualifications, because it's perfectly clear that in this case it was not the athlete that was at fault, but the system which unfairly disqualified him.
Bien descalificado por no concentrarse bien y salir en la señal del disparo
Referee needs a beat down. 🤜
Have szymański ?
soo sad he false started in such an important race 😢😢. It could happen to anyone
Very bad teknology now
Wrong dicetion
Parchment and Allen were non factors. Holloway was taking it either way.
Disagreed. Both of them beat Holloway before
Gonna go ahead and do my part in sending you to the bottom of this comment section 😉
The magic of competition is they all go head to head. The competition is what pushes you in that moment to be faster and break records. You don’t get better by racing people you know you will beat. Competitors need competitors.
@@Phoenixishot competition is also what pushes you to choke
Second one 😂
First one😂
1 year later…
trash
Holloway win. But poland Czykier No Medals. Oh God !
some BS
亂搞一通，亂
Stupid rules - gun goes off is a point in time - athlete leaves at a point in time - if one follows the other, then the athlete is good to go - simple - why make it complicated and controversial with an arbitrary, unscientific parameter. The athlete can actually legitimately start after the gun has gone off and before the sound has physically registered in his brain. There is a part of the brain that can be used in crisis situations like being attacked by a lion so that instead of quickly thinking how to react you just react which is quicker and can mean the difference between dead or alive. Bizarrely, when younger, I could use this brain function to answer mental agility tests with numbers - I could actually start answering a question before I had heard all of it - and I could freak some people out by doing so.
What a joke
Well, that is a lame race. Who wants to watch a race where there isn't enough competition?
Disappointed ☹️!
Black bad
Bad
Jamaica 🇯🇲 would have won
I'm glad he hurt himself so Grant could win😂😂😂