The Evolution of Multicellular Life

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2015
  • How oxygen enabled the development of multicellular organisms.

ความคิดเห็น • 361

  • @jcj0114
    @jcj0114 6 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    The background music makes me feel like i'm watching a suspense movie...

    • @tbrowntracyj
      @tbrowntracyj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I got the same feeling
      I kinda wanted to know more about the soundtrack

    • @youdontseeanoldmanhavinatw4904
      @youdontseeanoldmanhavinatw4904 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No music would have been much better

  • @ashleylastname9091
    @ashleylastname9091 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Awesome, I've always wondered how cells hold together an animal form.

  • @electronkaleidoscope5860
    @electronkaleidoscope5860 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    1:00
    That is *not* the voice I expected to hear seeing that face

    • @zes3813
      @zes3813 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      wrg, voice any nmw anda ny s ok

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zes3813 as soeu weihn açso is ok

    • @prohz9129
      @prohz9129 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like “brad pit and his pinwheels”

    • @Road_Rash
      @Road_Rash ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People's voices can't be predicted by their facial features...

    • @electronkaleidoscope5860
      @electronkaleidoscope5860 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Road_Rash That's completely fair- but there are certainly average patterns, yaknow. nothing wrong with it i just found it entertaining.

  • @ATRTAP
    @ATRTAP ปีที่แล้ว +7

    “These strange creatures which evolved from the snowball events, would not last long -just a few tens of millions of years.”

  • @CHistrue
    @CHistrue 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    If they discover trilobite DNA, then instead of "Jurassic Park" would the movie be titled "The Cambrian Explosion"?

  • @GenghisVern
    @GenghisVern 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    wow. so far the first 3 minutes really ARE epic. good stuff here

  • @alsojuja
    @alsojuja ปีที่แล้ว

    When was this documentary made?

  • @nikobauer6758
    @nikobauer6758 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does anyone know where I can find this full documentary?

  • @darnelljackson7115
    @darnelljackson7115 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice

  • @JulianPerez-zv6os
    @JulianPerez-zv6os 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I am so glad that they specified immediately that 1:21 was collagen. For a few seconds there, I was a little worried.

  • @hubert1010
    @hubert1010 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What's the name of this documentary?

    • @hubert1010
      @hubert1010 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I found it.

    • @ArielTetenboim
      @ArielTetenboim 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ?

    • @drwcody
      @drwcody 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Its called JimaNee Straitback, the road to human overpopulation

  • @AccidentalNinja
    @AccidentalNinja 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is collagen really the only thing that can be used for structure?

    • @NicoleWootten
      @NicoleWootten 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Nick de windt i have faulty collagen due to a genetic disorder - can confirm it is fairly essential haha

  • @DynestiGTI
    @DynestiGTI ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:46 "Oxygen was the molecule that would change the world" imagine if Mars had an atmosphere with oxygen. Imagine the complex extraterrestrial life that could have formed...

  • @aeray3581
    @aeray3581 ปีที่แล้ว

    What program are these from?

  • @cantonandrea
    @cantonandrea 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The video did not meet my expectations.. I mean, it explains what made possible the evolution of multicellular life (oxygen), but it did not explain the reasons for that (which the competitive advantage of early multicellular life are against monocellular one) and the middle step (I know that bacterial colonies played a crucial role)..
    In any case thumbs up for the effort :-)

  • @chistinelane
    @chistinelane 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What is this from?

  • @lilcuku3256
    @lilcuku3256 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    intresting

    • @thealmightyjesus7018
      @thealmightyjesus7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1 Corinthians Chapter 15 Is The Ressurrection Creed That Paul Had Received Only 3-5 Years After Jesus Crucifiction And Had It Written 20 Years Later In A.D 54-55 And Jesus Went On The Cross At A.D 30 Also The Tel Dan Inscription States The House Of David On It And The Moabite Stone Records Mesha Just Like The Bible Worshipping Yahweh The Pool Of Siloam When Jesus Heals The Guy Is Also A Real Place And The Book Of Acts Gets The Environment Of The First Century Correct Which Myths Do Not Do It States Drusilla And Felix Got Married While Josephus The Jewish Historian Records The Same Thing And Believing In The Jesus Of The Bible And Christianity We Are Saved By Grace Not Of Ourselves It Is The Free Gift Of God By Repenting And Putting On The Lord Jesus Christ While Jehovah Witness And Mormonism Do Not Think They Are Saved And Are Earning Salvation To Get It However The Biblical Jesus Is The Only Way And Its Not About Achieving It Rather It Is More Like Receiving Christ To Be Saved In Him And Your Works Are The Fruit Of Your Salvation Amen And 2 Timothy 4:11 States Bring The Cloak I Left At Carpus Indicating It Was Authentic And Jesus Is More Worth It For Everlasting Life And Gary Habermas Has The Greatest Case For The Ressurection And Dr. James Tour On TH-cam Also Shows The Reasons It Wasnt An Accident God Bless Jesus Is Lord
      Five Scientific Reasons To Believe In God
      th-cam.com/video/TtSXyrEzXs4/w-d-xo.html
      The Case For Design
      th-cam.com/video/vl802lHAk5Y/w-d-xo.html
      Jesus And His Ressurection Video
      th-cam.com/video/A0iDNLxmWVM/w-d-xo.html
      Gary Habermas On Jesus
      th-cam.com/video/ay_Db4RwZ_M/w-d-xo.html
      The Reliability Of The New Testamentt
      inspiringphilosophy.org/defending-christianity/

    • @thealmightyjesus7018
      @thealmightyjesus7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      #JESUS FIRST For By Jesus All Things Are Created I'm Here For The News Of The Kingdom Of God And While Religion Has You Doing Good Deeds To Earn Salvation The Biblical Jesus Died And Rose Again For The Forgiveness Of Sin And By Grace You Are Saved So You Walk In Him For He Loved Us So We Love The Lord

    • @thealmightyjesus7018
      @thealmightyjesus7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      #JESUS FIRST These Resources Are To Be Viewed Through A Gentle Context Amen Jesus Is Love And The Only Way To Be Saved Is Through The Jesus Of The Bible The Creator And It's The Free Gift Of God But May We Honor The Lord Jesus And No Longer Live For Ourselves But To The Lord

    • @thealmightyjesus7018
      @thealmightyjesus7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/2utSDK3zqYA/w-d-xo.html

    • @thealmightyjesus7018
      @thealmightyjesus7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      #JESUS FIRST Historical Jesus Facts For The Lord
      1 Jesus Died By Crucifixion
      2 He Was Buried
      3 His death caused the disciples to despair and lose hope
      4 The tomb was later found empty (accepted by 75% of scholars)
      5 The disciples had experiences which they believed were literal appearances of the risen Jesus
      6 The disciples were transformed from doubters to bold proclaimers
      7 The proclamation of the ressurection took place at the very beginning of the church
      8 They preached the message of Jesus's ressurrection in Jerusalem, where Jesus had been crucified and buried
      9 The gospel message centered On the death and ressurection of Jesus
      10 Orthodox Jews that believed in Christ had made Sunday their primary day of worship
      11 James a family skeptic, was converted to the faith when he believed he saw the ressurected Jesus
      12 Saul (Paul) was converted to the faith because he believed he saw the risen Jesus
      Gary Habermas, The Risen Jesus & Future Hope, 2003 pg 9-10

  • @MrEthereal
    @MrEthereal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this has highschool science class documentary vibes

  • @aaaaa-299
    @aaaaa-299 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:30

  • @oobrocks
    @oobrocks ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Think of this: for 3 billion yrs, all life was 1 cells

  • @Aluminata
    @Aluminata 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    All the wonders of multi-cellular diversity, from blue wales to butterflies- hamsters to hominids were exclusively enabled by the singular evolutionary phenomena of photosynthesis.

    • @goranvuksa1220
      @goranvuksa1220 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We are so lucky :)

    • @amanhumbled194
      @amanhumbled194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually dna proves God, and dna is present in every single creature and plant, oh and it's even in rocks.
      Dna is a code to make protein and protein is needed to read dna... Also tiny molecular machines exist in our cells, that are formed from proteins ... But proteins make dna sort of like the chicken and egg, except it's what came first... The protein, or the information to make protein and all the proteins needed to make that protein think and walk and see and eat on the super computer called dna. What clever little ameno acids they must have been to make dna protein scaffolding wonders
      Wherever you look, you find God staring right back at you ... Evolution is a lie

    • @nataltadpole7536
      @nataltadpole7536 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@amanhumbled194 Hahah, how about no.

  • @crgkevin6542
    @crgkevin6542 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about Anomalocaris? Many could argue that the arms race took off there when one of those first wrapped it's circular maw around a Trilobite...

    • @JulianPerez-zv6os
      @JulianPerez-zv6os 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Evolution was always an arms race but predators made things a bit spicier

    • @ssgoko88
      @ssgoko88 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many would be stupid

  • @gonorrheabreath3774
    @gonorrheabreath3774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Never, must, trilobite

  • @cliffordernest7825
    @cliffordernest7825 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I watched this on my iPhone while I took a shit.

  • @cakeandicecream1582
    @cakeandicecream1582 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Joseph Kirschink still going through puberty.

  • @lisanidog8178
    @lisanidog8178 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whose the narrator? His voice sounds familiar but can’t place the name.

    • @annoyed707
      @annoyed707 ปีที่แล้ว

      Christopher Plummer, Canadian actor.

    • @lisanidog8178
      @lisanidog8178 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@annoyed707 Thanks!

  • @samuelbenefiel5362
    @samuelbenefiel5362 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it chologen or cholorgen?

    • @billskinner7670
      @billskinner7670 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Collagen. The same stuff some hands lotions claim they are putting into your skin.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bill Skinner
      Those ceams derive their collagen from the stolen foreskins of forcibly clrcumclsed infant boys. Just think about how evil this is. Infant boys are literally being consumed like Soylent Green.

    • @JulianPerez-zv6os
      @JulianPerez-zv6os 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gregorymalchuk272 I am interested in your ideas and wish to read your newsletter.

  • @charliesmith6137
    @charliesmith6137 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's an interesting clip, but why did it take less than half a billion years for unicellular life, and three billion years to become multicellular?

    • @billskinner7670
      @billskinner7670 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The chemistry was right for life.
      There was no evolutionary pressure, for a long time, to become multicellular.

  • @gonorrheabreath3774
    @gonorrheabreath3774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that George from Seinfeld fame?!! 🤔😄♥️

  • @Pyr0Ben
    @Pyr0Ben 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And they call the Bible a fairy tale

  • @zineblahlou9791
    @zineblahlou9791 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    :pp

  • @barrycook5607
    @barrycook5607 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Oxygen was the molecule" pardon?

    • @thedemonlord8685
      @thedemonlord8685 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oxygen in nature is O2 two Oxygen atoms connected together so yes an Oxygen molecule

    • @barrycook5607
      @barrycook5607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thedemonlord8685 you know that, I know that (I am a retired Phys Chem teacher). However in the context used, Oxygen molecule was a slip of the tongue! In an assignment that statement would be marked, by me, "please expand"

  • @thereeljoefish
    @thereeljoefish 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am a BANANA!

  • @Yessiramabatukam
    @Yessiramabatukam 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    a fiction, more or less

    • @Dr.IanPlect
      @Dr.IanPlect ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you're clueless

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Says the guy who believes in talking animals, magic spells and invisible genies.

  • @notyouraveragecomment1328
    @notyouraveragecomment1328 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bs

  • @hewhointheearthlydomainsee1272
    @hewhointheearthlydomainsee1272 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Steady state programs in steady state environment. Is it really intelligent? I am not human because I choose to be. If I am not a choice, how am I really alive? Am I just a mechanical thing with delusions of reality?
    Choice is not an established impossibility. A (truly) living thing is a thing which is a choice. It is not steady state. Real life chooses to be what it will be based on the changing needs of circumstance. It takes all of this, this world, the universe, all of it in and then chooses to be what it needs to be.
    Perhaps life as a whole, the whole of evolution, is the method of choice such a true life would employ. Trial and error.

  • @harpo345
    @harpo345 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:45 "Oxygen was the molecule that would change the world."
    Oxygen is an element, not a molecule.

    • @annoyed707
      @annoyed707 ปีที่แล้ว

      Molecular oxygen.

  • @bearnaib
    @bearnaib 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    uh. ratio :/

  • @davidhayes7596
    @davidhayes7596 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If this were true , it could be duplicated in a lab.

    • @DenisK21
      @DenisK21 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look up "multicellular algae evolution" on Google, and the first result is all about exactly that.

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, and we essentially have.

  • @baubljos103
    @baubljos103 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nice fantasy, but the video neglected to explain how the 1st cell obtained enough energy to grow, and to divide. What did the 1st cell eat? Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide? There were no "nutrients" until after lots of cells had already grown, divided, died, and decomposed. Even if the 1st cell was photosynthetic - what energy source powered the 1st cell to build a photosynthetic biochemical system? The photosynthetic system has to be in place and operational BEFORE it can absorb light and create energy. So where did the energy come from to build the photosynthetic system?

    • @dragom2009
      @dragom2009 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the energy from the sun or vent´s in the bottom of he oceans. the hemical for the reactions probably from the chemical found in Earth in that time and the by Products of the non aeroba bacteria back then.

    • @baubljos103
      @baubljos103 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nope. Whether it was sun energy or oceanic heat vents - the 1st cell needs a highly complex and specific functional biochemical system to collect the energy, metabolize it, and grow. That cell needs to grow the energy metabolism before it can metabolize the energy, and the energy is useless until the energy metabolism is functional.

    • @baubljos103
      @baubljos103 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maxx Kroes I believe that's merely a platitude, Maxx. Yes chemical reactions happen, they happen to degrade. Nucleic acids and proteins break down - they don't build up. In order to form into highly complex chemicals with specific and interdependent functions, chemicals need energy and engineering. Even the 1950's Miller-Urey chemical evolution apparatus was engineered and had energy applied to it.

    • @SemiPerfectDark
      @SemiPerfectDark 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joe Baublis Pfft. That's easy, it was one or more of these five things:
      1) god
      2) magic
      3) supernatural
      4) miracles
      5) Santa Claus

    • @KJKP
      @KJKP 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Joe Baublis, This is an excellent point. I am studying now photosynthesis and the Calvin cycle as well as the Kreb’s cycle. It is amazing how plants and animals have the reverse systems. Plants metabolize sugars and animals catabolize them- a perfect system. But, if evolution were true, plants that did NOT produce edible sugars would thrive while those which did would perish through consumption. ... before man arrived to plant, tetrapods would have eaten all those plants to extinction. An integrated, redundant system designed and built by an omniscient God makes more sense. Waaaaaaay more sense.

  • @libertyprime9307
    @libertyprime9307 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    But we know this can't be true because God said the Earth was made in 6 days and is only about 6,000 years old. The supposed "evidence" for evolution was put there by God to try and trick us, because faith is preferable to logic and is the only thing that will get you into heaven.
    But even those who are faithful will not enter heaven if they have certain physical blemishes:
    Leviticus 21:16, KJV:
    _And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,_
    _Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God._
    _For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous,_
    _Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded,_
    _Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken_
    But only if you prefer faith to reason and have a straight back and pretty nose (and no scabs!) will you get into heaven.

    • @michaellurch9472
      @michaellurch9472 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Liberty Prime A tell me why the bible is valid. Then I'll listen. These bible thumpers never have an answer

    • @charliesmith6137
      @charliesmith6137 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So Liberty Prime's god is a lying asshole who plants fake evidence.

    • @unstoppableExodia
      @unstoppableExodia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Our dear friend Libby speaks the truth, why just the other day I gave god a call and me says to the man upstairs "yo whatup G" he be like "Yo Samberg what's crackin?" And I say there be all these fossils in the ground that be sayin that the earth is billions of years old yet you saying that the earth is only thousands of years old. What's the deal homeboy?" And God be sayin' "don't be trippin mah brutha, I put them there to test the faith of my sheeple because hahaha I'm a prankster god, we'll see who believes in me now" to which me says "oh you iz good. All dem Mr scientists thinking they're figuring things out like biology and electricity are really just denying themselves a place in heaven, innit"

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Liberty Prime
      Don't forget the evil incitememt to ClRCUMClSlON/GENITAL MUTILATION!!!

    • @keahililia8208
      @keahililia8208 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *Throws tomatoes*

  • @rektm8823
    @rektm8823 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oxygen isn't a molecule. It's an atom.

    • @EdwinLuciano
      @EdwinLuciano 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The common allotrope of elemental oxygen on Earth is generally known as oxygen. It is called 'molecular oxygen' and 'dioxygen' too.

    • @Qleaner303
      @Qleaner303 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      o2 is an oxygen gas molecule.. if we are to be splitting hairs

    • @EdwinLuciano
      @EdwinLuciano 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Call it an atom, an element, or a molecule, the stuff is poison. It's the reason why we are told to eat foods with antioxidants in them even though we have evolved to live in an atmosphere where 20 percent of the gas is this toxic substance. Oxidation is deadly and the rise in oxygen in the atmosphere was accompanied by a mass extinction event in the precambrian. The countless organisms that were wiped out didn't care what it should have been called.

    • @rektm8823
      @rektm8823 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ah yes, O2 is diatomic, my mistake my friends.
      I still won't call it a molecule. 😉

    • @DarcyWhyte
      @DarcyWhyte 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Atoms can be molecules. Like a square is a rectangle....

  • @MrGreen-fi5sg
    @MrGreen-fi5sg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes

    • @MrGreen-fi5sg
      @MrGreen-fi5sg ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Eisenbison No

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrGreen-fi5sg It doesn't matter how much you want to deny it. This is something we can prove.

    • @MrGreen-fi5sg
      @MrGreen-fi5sg ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Eisenbison And why should I believe? Wtf is gonna happen if I don't?

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrGreen-fi5sg Nothing really. You have a right to believe whatever you want, but people are gonna laugh if you try to argue for an impossible alternative.

  • @charlesyoung2530
    @charlesyoung2530 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a load of garbage.What ever happened to the honest scientists that admitted they didn't have a clue on certain things.

    • @Eisenbison
      @Eisenbison 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We can prove beyond any amount of doubt that life has evolved since its single-cellular beginings and is still evolving now.
      Transitional fossils, phylogeny, genetic markers and other evidence all point exclusively to evolution in brilliant detail, with no *possible* alternative.