What caused the Cambrian explosion?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2015
  • For most of the Earth's history, life consisted of the simplest organisms; but then something happened that would give rise to staggering diversity, and, ultimately, life as complex as that which we see today. Scientists are still struggling to figure out just what that was.
    Subscribe NOW to The Economist: econ.st/1Fsu2Vj
    Get more The Economist
    Follow us: / theeconomist
    Like us: / theeconomist
    View photos: / theeconomist
    The Economist videos give authoritative insight and opinion on international news, politics, business, finance, science, technology and the connections between them.

ความคิดเห็น • 2K

  • @PointyTailofSatan
    @PointyTailofSatan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    What is not really explained well in this video is the fact that simple single celled life seems to have developed almost the moment liquid water was available 3.5 billion years ago. So it would appear the initial creation of basic life was relatively easy. It was the sudden jump to multi-cellular life after 3 billion more years that remains one of the greatest questions of biology.

    • @ChristianityRecap
      @ChristianityRecap ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Your dates are way off. Have you come to Christ yet, or still think you came from a rock?

    • @Spicy_Italian_Sausage
      @Spicy_Italian_Sausage ปีที่แล้ว +98

      @@ChristianityRecap 💀💀🤣🤣

    • @Spicy_Italian_Sausage
      @Spicy_Italian_Sausage ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChristianityRecap the fact that you believe anything other than humans being highly evolved primates is astonishing. We are animals... nothing more nothing less.

    • @samfrazee7022
      @samfrazee7022 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      @@ChristianityRecap bro this is one of the worst attempts at evangelism I’ve ever seen

    • @ChristianityRecap
      @ChristianityRecap ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@samfrazee7022 thank you!

  • @dinobite5209
    @dinobite5209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    never knew an anime would connect me to this prehistoric things

    • @user-hv7zb5ps3t
      @user-hv7zb5ps3t 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      dino bite I know right? I watch ONE video on the weird centipede thing and now my recommendations are full of marine biologist documentaries

    • @alli3670
      @alli3670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-hv7zb5ps3t LOL SAMEE

    • @hemblem131
      @hemblem131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-hv7zb5ps3t ye the parasite thingy from Shingeki no kyojin

    • @orangenade3707
      @orangenade3707 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hemblem131 hallucigenia

    • @vimalcurio
      @vimalcurio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      AoT?

  • @JayHeartwing
    @JayHeartwing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    The reasons why people are here:
    - Biologists
    - Bill Wurtz
    - Attack on Titan

    • @drip260
      @drip260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      none of them.

    • @kda5901
      @kda5901 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      all of them lol hahaha

    • @somefuckingretard8289
      @somefuckingretard8289 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm here from Bill Wurtz. Never watched Attack on Titan just like I never watched The Matrix because if I ever talk about something considered "deep" I want people to know things I say come from experience and the mind, not from a movie I was inspired by and decided I'd become a wanna-be

    • @mikepencestoes
      @mikepencestoes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have an ocean obsession 🧍🏻

    • @zackakai5173
      @zackakai5173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      - Yes
      - Big yes
      - I don't know, I only watched the first season back when it came out and I was never interested enough to watch more xD

  • @shawnporter5109
    @shawnporter5109 7 ปีที่แล้ว +549

    Unlike facebook which is utter crap, youtube may be the most useful site on the internet. Wanted to be a paleontologist as a kid, career path went elsewhere but maintained my fascination for the subject. youtube has vast amounts of material on the topic and allows the intested layman access to materials thay may have long been forgotten. Well done,,,,Oh and interesting summation. Amazing how well we have progressed in our understanding of the beginnigns of life.

    • @MrKmanthie
      @MrKmanthie 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I completely agree with you - Facebook is really stupid. It's a real waste of time. just an excuse to stay inside and never interact with people, "IRL". You Tube, on the other hand - as long as you stay away from (most of_ the comments, one can find an amazing amount of programs, videos, movies, and all sorts of unpredictable things which people from around the world have uploaded- everything from silly cats-trying-to-walk-on-treadmills videos to videotaped college course lectures from such institutions as Stanford, MIT, (grudgingly I'll say it:) Yale (although, of course, Harvard is so much better than Yale, but that's a different argument for another time). Anyway, if you want to find educational videos about all sorts of subjects - weather/climate sciences, astrophysics, quantum physics, anthropology, etc., etc. and, of course, there are millions of songs that are uploaded either as just a still picture-video with the song playing or else the video for the song is uploaded or even, sometimes, some uploader will create their own video for a particular song and post it, and sometimes you find whole albums' worth of stuff, i.e., a whole album in one post. Also, there are also lots of movies - both public domain ones, like so many great things from the early 30s (and a lot of these early 30s movies are actually better than the stuff that came out of Hollywood after that awful "Hays Code" -that asshole who, being an uptight stick-up-the-ass jerk & trying to kiss the govt's ass so they wouldn't clamp down & legislate Victorian morals on films-which happened anyway, up until the 60s, when taboos were finally being chopped down & flushed down the goddamn toilet! But you can sometimes catch a newer (copyrighted) movie that has either escaped the copyright-policing software that takes those down by speeding up the sound or doing some sort of tricky thing with the picture quality - sometimes it's in the form of an elliptical light in the middle of the movie that can be distracting when the scene happens to be in a dark spot - say, at night or in a darkened room, etc. Or, you may get a chance to see a newer movie if you chance upon it just in time, before it gets taken down for copyright reasons. Anyway, yes, You Tube is a great thing - I only wish all the trolls that waste so much time with their back & forth verbal catfights and temper tantrums, etc. would go somewhere else - like Facebook and stay there! -otherwise, just stay up where the video is & ignore the comments and you'll enjoy the experience much more!

    • @MrKmanthie
      @MrKmanthie 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yeah, FUCK facebook. Bunch of idiots.

    • @shirleymason7697
      @shirleymason7697 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I tried FB briefly and quickly knew it was a huge waste of my valuable time. Time is something of which they won’t be making more. I took a look at some of the connections to my FB, and, YEESH ! many people had posted every bit of trivia as though - if they couldn’t record each meal, each trip, each day, each breath, it hadn’t existed, and they might not exist. Perhaps they do not exist, if FB takes up so much of their concentration.

    • @stackflow343
      @stackflow343 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      TH-cam is a mess actually.

    • @stevemoyer2273
      @stevemoyer2273 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Try TED talks. Even better

  • @gnzl5653
    @gnzl5653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Shingeki no kyojin

  • @djayszxs
    @djayszxs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Aot chap 137 be like:

  • @brotalnia
    @brotalnia 8 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    this is the kind of videos i subscribed for

    • @Mrbfgray
      @Mrbfgray 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Indeed. And one of the most fascinating topics ever.

    • @robwells5753
      @robwells5753 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i didnt sub but im happy you did , )

  • @bidnetwork.828
    @bidnetwork.828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Attack on Titan refrencess

  • @NopalTheRock
    @NopalTheRock 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Literally, AOT bring everyone to learn biology

    • @SimbolicProductions
      @SimbolicProductions 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      AOC*

    • @agnostic_man6943
      @agnostic_man6943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Attack on Titan?

    • @vimalcurio
      @vimalcurio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For me it was a Jeff Bezos video lol but I've also watched that episode on AOT but didn't go that deep there

  • @diebesgrab
    @diebesgrab 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The Economist: What caused the Cambrian explosion?
    Me: Wait, what? The economist is looking at paleontology? What?

  • @zedwms
    @zedwms 6 ปีที่แล้ว +238

    Nobody expects the Cambrian Explosion!

    • @keepdancingmaria
      @keepdancingmaria 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Now, THAT was unexpected!!!!!

    • @williamchamberlain2263
      @williamchamberlain2263 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would've made Monty Python a lot harder to shoot.

    • @cjb4924
      @cjb4924 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just made this comment elsewhere in these comments, but now see you beat me to it. First kudos to you.

    • @larryquirap5154
      @larryquirap5154 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is an intervention

    • @robertbrodie5183
      @robertbrodie5183 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It chief weapon is shells and mobility. Our two chief weapons are shells,mobility and a ruthless devotion to evolution. Its three, three chief

  • @brainstormingsharing1309
    @brainstormingsharing1309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @HotZetiGer
    @HotZetiGer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    they talk about eyes, oxygen but no sexual organ explosions ?

  • @cafinario
    @cafinario 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    Ok, we have no idea how the Cambrian explosion occurred.

    • @chimpanzeethat3802
      @chimpanzeethat3802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Evolution.

    • @yahwayapps7947
      @yahwayapps7947 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      May be all animals created at the same time instead of evolutionary process?

    • @chimpanzeethat3802
      @chimpanzeethat3802 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      No of course not. There are pre-Cambrian fossil ancestors for organisms in the Cambrian. Not many of them admittedly because soft bodied organisms are hard to find in the fossil record.
      Evolution is already proven to exist.

    • @grinckerthesoul1510
      @grinckerthesoul1510 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chimpanzeethat3802 Yes, simply a mixture of random genetic modifications

    • @SonofJacob120
      @SonofJacob120 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chimpanzeethat3802 explain to me the evolution of the human eye.

  • @MattJohno2
    @MattJohno2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    It's the cambrian explosion!
    "Wow, that's animals and stuff"

    • @lucasmartin9511
      @lucasmartin9511 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You forgot the TM at the end of the word stuff

    • @danifields6805
      @danifields6805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can we go on land now?
      "NO"
      Why?
      "THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER"
      Oh ok.
      "Not anymore. There's a blanket"

  • @raziismail8230
    @raziismail8230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Explosion occur because someone turn into Titan.

  • @Tapajara
    @Tapajara 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Consider that the Cambrian Explosion was pretty much about the arthropods which happened because of their new found ability to produce chitin. For the mollusks it was the Ordovician (and their ability to produce a calcium carbonate shell). For the Chordates it was the Silurian (and their ability to produce a calcium phosphate skeleton). It was all about the ability lay down skeletal material and HGT (horizontal gene transfer) was almost certainly the mechanism that spread the capability among related taxa.

    • @mikerogers4640
      @mikerogers4640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agreed. Former soft animals simply died and got eaten or vice versa. The one change of adding hard matter such as shells or skeletons created fossils. Just one small change and all is explained. No great time involved.

    • @wombatmobile
      @wombatmobile ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean by "soft animals"? How many cells were they composed of? Were they eukaryotes? What caused the evolution of soft animals? How did life go from single cells to multiple celled organisms?

    • @midas01tw
      @midas01tw ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wombatmobile the ancestors of the cambrian fossils, no skeleton or shell, no fossils, but they were somewhat more like animals than simple multicelular life

    • @wombatmobile
      @wombatmobile ปีที่แล้ว

      @@midas01tw Were they eukaryotes? How did life go from single cells to multiple celled organisms?

    • @fishwoman7825
      @fishwoman7825 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wombatmobile Best off asking a biologist those questions mate. I doubt random youtube commenters will be able to answer your questions with accuracy and explanation, you will just end up doubting the answers and forming your own incorrect ones

  • @Roger-hu4tk
    @Roger-hu4tk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Aot fans anyone?

  • @platinumare
    @platinumare 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Had been watching the Beirut explosion, so when I clicked on this, the expectation that this video might mention a physical chain reaction explosion involving explosive products, thinking acme tnt that the road runner used, were pretty high. I have learnt something new and covered history for the day.

  • @joshuamacauley1254
    @joshuamacauley1254 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative thank you :)

  • @Ian64
    @Ian64 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Now we know the Ediacarans lived alongside the Cambrians, and Anomalocaridids survived until during the Devonian

    • @christianv-h3278
      @christianv-h3278 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hope we soon manage to fill the Silurian gap in the anomalocaridid record...

  • @elicurlee-strauss7339
    @elicurlee-strauss7339 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    thank you been pondering this mystery all day and all night and i a m tired of all the conspiracy theories about it . this was succinct and based on science.

    • @mohammedhasanen6291
      @mohammedhasanen6291 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what science ?? the whole video is just showing theories with no single scientific evidence.... watch it again .. every scientist is just giving his own opinion !!

    • @joshmarsh2532
      @joshmarsh2532 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mohammedhasanen6291 Looks like someone didn't learn the difference between theory and hypothesis in school. Gravity is a theory, don't see you claiming it's not real

    • @mohammedhasanen6291
      @mohammedhasanen6291 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshmarsh2532 … Wow, Please teach me your wisdom and tell me the difference. I think if you were living 500 years ago, you would be easily convinced that the moon was being swallowed by a dragon during eclipses, because the wise man in the village said so 😂.
      Hypothesis or a theory 🤔, if it’s a hypothesis, then you cannot call it science because no one sure if it’s true or not .. if it’s a theory then it needs to be consistent with the data AND LOGICAL.
      A dragon swallowing the moon during eclipse is consistent with the data ( the mood suddenly disappears) but not LOGICAL.
      Having this variety of creatures in such a short period of time with this scale because the oxygen level become higher is simply not logical to me.

  • @saigeruback
    @saigeruback 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WOW that was a very well done video! 👍

  • @karlpages1970
    @karlpages1970 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the vid :-)

  • @theHentySkeptic
    @theHentySkeptic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    most of the basic body forms (plus some we have since lost) appeared out of nowhere for no known reason in a little bit more than the time taken for us to diversify from our chimp ancestor - amazing! All those; complex organs, feedback loops in physiology, nervous systems etc - utterly and literally fantastic.

    • @busylivingnotdying
      @busylivingnotdying 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, if I understand it correctly, what emerged "suddenly", was life that FOSSILIZED well enough to be classified. We know too little about the creatures before the Cambrian to contrast it (with certainty) with what came after.
      Some say the Cambrian explosion started well BEFORE the Cambrian .. extending it to maybe 50 million years (if I remember correctly)

  • @lilitheden748
    @lilitheden748 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I just cannot get enough of this evolution stuff, it’s amazing, wonderful and magical ...

  • @brugelxencerf
    @brugelxencerf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is so great. I love videos like this.

  • @wonderboy4993
    @wonderboy4993 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Tough to study. Lack of fossilization due to hard bodies make this really tough lots of holes scientists haven’t figured out yet

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

  • @joshuaoha
    @joshuaoha 8 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    Competition really drives innovation.

    • @EGarrett01
      @EGarrett01 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      +joshuaoha
      Send this video to Bernie Sanders please.

    • @bakalitetrick968
      @bakalitetrick968 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      +joshuaoha competition between species, you knuckleheads.

    • @EGarrett01
      @EGarrett01 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      m. buss
      ...and within species, and in economics.

    • @bakalitetrick968
      @bakalitetrick968 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +The Blind Nigga Samurai ... its just that, really, this video is about a different type of competition and a different type of evolution.

    • @spensermitchell4106
      @spensermitchell4106 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Wissenschaftlich Bewiesen try being a little less pompous and people will respect your intelligence. Especially if you respect their beliefs.

  • @sniper9961
    @sniper9961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yeagerbomb

  • @bitjezeverpeisek
    @bitjezeverpeisek 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do they have more videos about history? Mindblowing ö

  • @AminFassiFehri
    @AminFassiFehri 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should provide sources in the description like links to papers and reviews

  • @adambf5145
    @adambf5145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Stop spoiling Attack on titan with these videos

  • @--Paws--
    @--Paws-- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I wonder if the water back then was freshwater, brackish or saltwater. It could be that different concentrations of minerals and chemicals affected the creatures and it didn't matter since they have adopted to their environment.
    The shape of a creature is affected by how they move and how their mate and their opponents react (social interactions).
    A predator will eat their prey regardless of shells and spikes. The shells, spikes and other limbs affect how the creature expresses their aggression towards a rival and many other methods of communication towards their mate.
    The size and the other augmented body parts are due to their way of obtaining food and how they move about.
    Most of the creatures featured in the video resemble many microscopic creatures and vernal pond creatures of today.

    • @essex3777
      @essex3777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I always wondered if a human went back to that time, would he be able to survive? Would the atmosphere be breathable? Is the land hostiles? Where can he find food?

    • @archravenineteenseventeen
      @archravenineteenseventeen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@essex3777 nope. We have smaller lungs and can't handle vast amount of oxygen

  • @darthcheney7447
    @darthcheney7447 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    good vid. few docs on cambrian explosion and even less on the ediacren.

  • @jasoncrabtree4982
    @jasoncrabtree4982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fabulous Edification

  • @indridcold8433
    @indridcold8433 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have noticed many trilobites are found in the folded posture. It seems it was a defensive posture to protect its softer under body. I have ten trilobites. Six of them are in the defensive folded posture.

  • @leebomcclelland504
    @leebomcclelland504 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cambrian period is so cool life-form

  • @sagarpuri7838
    @sagarpuri7838 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great thanks For this ConTENT

  • @henrygivens7639
    @henrygivens7639 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    great content 😎

  • @stankfaust814
    @stankfaust814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I've always viewed the cambrian explosion as an event wherein you have a vast habitat of plant life with no predation. Once levels of oxygen became enough to support sustained movement, the arms race began. But keep in mind, that virtually EVERY predatory mutation during this time was likely successful (or at least a large portion were compared to later where predatory niches are filled and competition fierce)

    • @TrinityCore60
      @TrinityCore60 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait, that only happened in the Precambrian? I didn’t realized that took so long.

    • @_vallee_5190
      @_vallee_5190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oxygen levels were higher prior to the Cambrian explosion so this doesn't make any sense. In face snowball earth was caused by Cyanobacteria removing carbon from the atmosphere, which occurred long before the Cambrian.

  • @twerdeffan1080
    @twerdeffan1080 7 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Wow, that's animals and stuff.

    • @bobyfrans5370
      @bobyfrans5370 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      bill wurtz

    • @itskevinjustkevin
      @itskevinjustkevin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But we're still in the ocean hey can we go on land?

    • @Jessica-xh7lt
      @Jessica-xh7lt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for explaining I was so lost

    • @kunnoqi6054
      @kunnoqi6054 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      why?
      *THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER*

    • @corruptedholiness8995
      @corruptedholiness8995 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kunnoqi6054 not anymore theres a blanket

  • @CashewEater
    @CashewEater 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad they talk about the Avalon Period in the Ediacaran Period.

  • @rossbabcock2974
    @rossbabcock2974 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    13--25 million years is sort of a 'slow motion' explosion. We often forget evolution is agonizingly long!

  • @matbroomfield
    @matbroomfield 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    "Life literally exploded" _Andrew Parker_ I don't think proffessor Parker knows what the word "literally" means.

  • @erenjaeger1738
    @erenjaeger1738 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    shhh my weebs this is history class

  • @tgreg9542
    @tgreg9542 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great vid

  • @JCO2002
    @JCO2002 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent, thanks,

  • @danielmilev848
    @danielmilev848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Aot

  • @robertmiller1299
    @robertmiller1299 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They have no idea what CAUSED the Cambrian explosion.

    • @generalleenknassknotretire9180
      @generalleenknassknotretire9180 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Humans don't know a lot of things.
      What's your point?

    • @ZGGuesswho
      @ZGGuesswho 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      but they know much, and it is proven through various causal mechanisms that are trackable through re-provable feedback mechanisms that happen through constants, like chemical action. It's an insane amount of state history for extractable data, because it's stratified, or because it is retained in genetics. That's huge amounts of backing data. I don't even know why I'm saying it to you "Robert" because you're not gonna care and it's probably better that you don't. We're fucked.

    • @ducksmugglers
      @ducksmugglers 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was semtex a thing back then?

  • @rejmons1
    @rejmons1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting! There is some questions in earth history without the answer. But remarkably, the Economist is trying to find the answer. But of course, I have no question about. WELL DONE!

    • @hossameldeeb8686
      @hossameldeeb8686 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you think the Cambrian explosion pose challenge to evoultion ?

    • @rejmons1
      @rejmons1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe... Of course I'm not sure. Nobody could be sure about. And I'm the kind of "detective" as Mulder from "The X Files". I love to try to find the answer on the questions on which, truly speaking, have no answer. I know, I'm the freak... What can I say? So, this time challenge to evolution! As I suppose. Because it were nothing, and suddenly - BANG! A lot of form of life. Very distressing,,,

    • @hossameldeeb8686
      @hossameldeeb8686 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Tomasz Wójcik why distressing

    • @rejmons1
      @rejmons1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Hossam Eldeeb Why? Because the modern science like every religion have got the "fundamental" and "immutable" truths: And one of "most fundamental" is the evolution. Life was born in long chemistry process. And then it have been evolved from primitive bacteria to complex organisms. This process was slow and continuous. And, there is the lack of continuity. And science can not find the answer. One of most fundamental pillar of faith of science is shaking itself...
      PS: I'm the Christian (Roman Catholic) in Medieval style: The Religion is the fundamental for me. I do not believe in God, but I believe to God! And the modern science is against the religion. So, I do not care about this trouble of science!

    • @hossameldeeb8686
      @hossameldeeb8686 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Tomasz Wójcik science not aganist all religion but you believe in god now ?

  • @VirgoShelter
    @VirgoShelter 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the animation!

  • @bibia666
    @bibia666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The answer to that question is : THE EDIACARIAN EXPLOSION did trigger the cambrian explosion.

  • @buckfisherGBY
    @buckfisherGBY 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I think a considerable factor in the cause of the explosion of life at the time of the Cambrian Era, is that the earth's temperature at the time is the warmest it has been since that time. Warmer than the Eocene Optimum. There is always more growth and variety in warmer times.

  • @allysloper1882
    @allysloper1882 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you know, if I turn the sound right the way to the top it almost sounds like there are people talking.

  • @louisvonbeethoven
    @louisvonbeethoven 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Then, in the late Devouring period, fish became obnoxious"

  • @bnenomore
    @bnenomore 6 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    I'm almost 30 & I chuckled when the narrator said anus .... * sigh *

    • @brianhackert8513
      @brianhackert8513 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      the church people blushed and felt ashamed

    • @juggalo184
      @juggalo184 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Grow up. We don't need naughty language to entertain us.

    • @shirleymason7697
      @shirleymason7697 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Anus is an appropriate anatomical term, just like saying face, foot, knee, - go to school.

    • @shirleymason7697
      @shirleymason7697 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly what would you almost-thirty have had him say? That aperture at one end for elimination? Almost-thirty sounds almost-ten.

    • @bnenomore
      @bnenomore 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Shirley Mason I make no excuses for what my idiotic baby brain finds funny. Lighten up Shirley

  • @scottdetter
    @scottdetter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First they said, Cambrian explosion was a mystery, then said, what happened Exactly!

    • @Cyberpuppy63
      @Cyberpuppy63 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a mystery due to a lack of "hard", easy to find evidence. a) due to most fossils not having hard parts; and b) convective and geo-morphic removal of rock and land masses due to subduction.

    • @scottdetter
      @scottdetter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Cyberpuppy63 there should be 1000’s more transitional fossils than there are actual fossils. I’m all for “theories” & “hypothesis” and even the word that science can’t live without namely “Chance” but the real insidious word that is always thrown around with abandon in the scientific world (and the political world for that matter) is the word “Fact”. We can’t have our cake & eat it too.

  • @davidpresnell1734
    @davidpresnell1734 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    MORE VOLUME!!!

  • @jasonqian
    @jasonqian 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's one of the most extraordinary events in the earth's history where the sea animals of major phyla appeared all of a sudden, the recent fossil find in China, the Qingjiang biota is yet another vivid illustration of this event that occurred 518 million years ago globally.

  • @MrMedukneusha
    @MrMedukneusha 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    YAY! A documentary that wasnt uploaded by a 1993 camcorder bootleg!!

  • @RifetOkic
    @RifetOkic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where is the Link between cambrian explosiojn or any life, and the hard problem of conciousness?

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why? You refer to Abiogenesis, something that happened billions of years before that period and something as consciousness that happened millions of years later. In either case they have some compelling evidence.

    • @RifetOkic
      @RifetOkic 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn’t that the materialistic/chemical explanation ?
      I mean basically, how , why and when does an hydrogen atom start to have an inner experience ?
      I mean bacteria have maybe a billionth of a billionth of the conciousness we have, nothing as rich as we do, maybe the faintest sense of light or pressure.
      I mean also: this complex brain activity, or any sensory experience, why is there an subjective aspect? Why is it not all happening in the dark without us having an experience ?
      I mean, the matter itself is unconcious, how can it ever give rise to something as immaterial as an experience ?
      I’m searching for some answers. But this video is definitely interesting and all gathered knowledge is welcome.

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RifetOkic The total is more than the sum of its components. The brain is a collection of neurons that is so complex that it now creates the consciousness. Look at chimps, they too are aware of their existence.
      They too feel compassion for other chimps.
      So, even though it is mind boggling it is the result of biochemistry.
      For instance, you do know that people with brain damage can loose parts of their cognition. They often can not speak or understand what you say, they can loose their empathy for others etc.
      It is a wonderful thing that we are at this stage of evolution, I wonder what the far future will bring.

  • @jctutorials1759
    @jctutorials1759 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Millions of years ago “hey look it’s a lizard in water”
    Earth “NO”
    **throws oxygen at lizard**
    “No your a dinosaur now”
    **REEE**

  • @ashleybryant8083
    @ashleybryant8083 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ashley Bryant GOL 106 V1. I learned that there is much debate as to what exactly caused the Cambrian explosion with hypothesis ranging from an explosion of oxygen levels just prior to the Cambrian to a potential mass extinction prior to the Cambrian making it appear that new sorts of creatures rapidly evolved when, in fact, they had been around beforehand and just now had new ecological niches that they could fill.

  • @JohnStephenWeck
    @JohnStephenWeck 7 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    Greetings all. The Cambrian explosion occurred in the eukaryotic cell based organisms, and they completely outclassed their competition (making animals, plants, fungi) leading to an evolutionary explosion. This superiority is especially visible in multi-cellular forms. This is really a story about eukaryotes “flexing their muscles” after a couple of billion years of perfecting their reproductive and maintenance control mechanisms.
    The most important aspect of the eukaryotes is a cell nucleus that functions like a computing system with hardware (DNA memory system, memory system operations like reading/writing/error correction, etc.) and software (the genome). The eukaryotes had built a cellular computer sufficiently powerful to reliably construct and maintain the complexity of a multi-cellular form.
    Thanks for listening.

    • @CalvinDilbert
      @CalvinDilbert 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thank you! Glad to be an eukaryote.

    • @JohnStephenWeck
      @JohnStephenWeck 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ;)

    • @gunnaropsahl5209
      @gunnaropsahl5209 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Interesting! I would still like to question the claim that "(...)eukaryotes had built a cellular computer system(...)".
      Does anyone actually know how the information-rich molecules and the cell's information-processing system in the DNA/RNA arose?

    • @JohnStephenWeck
      @JohnStephenWeck 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      greetings gunnar, I don't know anything about the origins of cellular computers. But I do know that wherever software systems exist in a control system, it provides the intelligence of that system. The bigger the software, the more intelligent the system. In this case, the nucleus "computer" is manufacturing a multi-cellular organism (with high level structures like organs, tissues, etc), not merely a pool of cells, like the Stromatolites (which takes little information beyond just cells to construct and maintain). In order to construct the more complex organisms, there had to be an evolution of software-size (indirectly the DNA memory system size) so that it would be big enough to solve this problem. This includes any error correction required to maintain the larger memory.

    • @MasterChief-sl9ro
      @MasterChief-sl9ro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That is nice. But time is not a physical force. You need something to spur it. And you don't have Billions of years. You got maybe 20 million. As the conditions on earth for the first 3.5 billion was recovering from the formation of the moon and thick atmosphere to be stropped away. Then just at the proper conditions exist. It all just comes alive at around 600 million years ago. Mot to mention. Once you have water in all three states. You have Oxidation. Corrosion. Chlorine and Radiation. All of which would stop any cellular life from forming new features. As you get crippling mutations. That degrade the genetic information.
      And yes. I know my biology. As we got better microscopes today....

  • @stuckonaslide
    @stuckonaslide 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Explanation: nature was high for 2 billion years

  • @VocallyDerivative
    @VocallyDerivative 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    sound is quite low

  • @gerrardjones28
    @gerrardjones28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Its the Cambrian explosion!

  • @neilprice4915
    @neilprice4915 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I thought the economists are only interested in economics.🤔

    • @adamplentl5588
      @adamplentl5588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess life is a big part of economics.

    • @cheeseycheezy
      @cheeseycheezy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean, without the start of life there is no economists- ;-;

    • @LionKing-ew9rm
      @LionKing-ew9rm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamplentl5588
      I think economy, is an extension of biology (into the humanities)

  • @SeaJay_Oceans
    @SeaJay_Oceans 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you Cambrian explosion, I am enjoying existing as a human being ! :-)
    It would be nice if you could repeat that, and create thousands of new species to keep Earth Alive.

  • @jamesjacocks6221
    @jamesjacocks6221 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good presentation. I felt the animated life forms were fanciful but not being an expert I can only compare some of the forms and the fossil record in texts and collections. Very stimulating.

  • @filmic1
    @filmic1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When do Tunicates (early chordates) show up?

  • @HERO_KID_SHORTS
    @HERO_KID_SHORTS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Aot....

  • @greyedgerton2890
    @greyedgerton2890 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thumbnail of my mother-in-law.

  • @VitalMusic217
    @VitalMusic217 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So we don't know what caused the Cambrian explosion. Saved you 11 minutes.

  • @wes89
    @wes89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Life literally exploded... metaphorically speaking of course.

  • @ragtaghero84
    @ragtaghero84 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Mind boggling and awesome do not begin to give this topic justice.

    • @TaoMing
      @TaoMing 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seeking the truth as it relates to conscious life? Search *_Truth Contest_* and read the top entry called "The Present".

    • @tgreg9542
      @tgreg9542 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Matthew Chua well back in theses times I’m pretty sure sure animals were laying eggs and the male would fertilize them......not humping was done YET

  • @Dr.HJ99
    @Dr.HJ99 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Who is like me searching for a religious comment? Lol

  • @cweefy
    @cweefy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @slehar
    @slehar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent presentation. But what about the Eucariotic cell? And Mitochondria? Wasn't THAT the trigger?

    • @brandons.
      @brandons. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it can't be that. The Eucariotic cell and the Mitochondria helped create MULTI-CELLULAR LIFEFORMS. The Cambrian Explosion was about the development of hard-bodied creatures and animals that could move on their own. Vision was created and you could fully be aware of your surroundings. Multi-cellur lifeforms appeared before the Cambrian Explosion. They were Ediacaran creatures. What you are describing was the trigger for multi-cellular lifeforms, NOT the Cambrian Explosion.

  • @stuartstark
    @stuartstark 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Answer: The Kree

  • @chimp1561
    @chimp1561 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🎼it's the Cambrian explosion🎼

    • @JeremiahKlarman
      @JeremiahKlarman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, that’s animals and stuff.

  • @rambiss89
    @rambiss89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To sum it up, no matter how confidently we talk, none of us have any clue what happened except that it was an explosion of life forms. There are many presuppositions upon presuppositions in what we say but we hope you don't notice.

  • @mattlm64
    @mattlm64 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sounds like it could be something of a "snowball" effect. Once the basic foundations are in place for competitive evolution it accelerates from there. Maybe an extinction event at the end of the Ediacaran gave enough opportunity for certain forms of animal to emerge and seed the Cambrian explosion, or one or more evolutionary innovations allowed an animal to gain a sudden upper-hand and displace the other Ediacaran biota very quickly.

  • @matt-san1711
    @matt-san1711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think the cause is something called *EREN JAEGAR*

  • @ludwigjosh9619
    @ludwigjosh9619 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    ITS A CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION!!!!!!!!!!!!🎵🎵

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rock on !

  • @SneakyLlamaMC
    @SneakyLlamaMC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This Much Quality Of a Video 7 Years Old Is Not Normal

  • @johnlawrence2757
    @johnlawrence2757 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    At around 8 minutes this post talks about relationships between marine predators and their prey, and states that it has been possible to examine the stomach contents of a sea dwelling life form from 64 million years ago. Please could you explain how this data (the nature of the stomach contents) was obtained and is it available to public viewing

  • @31tomcat
    @31tomcat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I believe that predation is the cause of accelerated evolution. Precambrian life would have included predatory life, albeit unconcious predation. For example, the absortion of other organisms. The absorbed species would evolve ways to defend against this, leading to hard bodies being formed. This would lead the predatory organisms to evolve ways to break those defences. Jaws for example. The whole of evolution has been an arms race.

    • @cabudagavin3896
      @cabudagavin3896 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      probably because there are many different viable responses to predation, as well as many different responses to those defence mechanisms, maybe the increased oxygen specified in the video increased the top size of mass accumulation thus increasing predation and allowing for more trophic levels in between apex and producer,

    • @cabudagavin3896
      @cabudagavin3896 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i.e. morphology became the new meta.

  • @bobyfrans5370
    @bobyfrans5370 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    bill wurtz brings me here

  • @tr-sv4uv
    @tr-sv4uv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how did they reproduce tho i kinda need to find out for my school project

  • @vwcccollegeaccount3079
    @vwcccollegeaccount3079 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uclid Sylvestre Spring 2020 GOL 106 V1: It is interesting that many approximate dates are mentioned but then statements are made about the lack of evidence to support the given theory. This just seems to confuse more than elaborate on the history of Earth and life.

    • @ozowen5961
      @ozowen5961 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or they could pretend to a certainty they don't have.
      The degree of certainty is perhaps the element you are missing here?

  • @norm1286
    @norm1286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Did we shift realities or did the founder wipe our memories?

  • @geoffreyzwegers3711
    @geoffreyzwegers3711 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about bioturbation caused by early worms? It could explain both the sudden disappearance of the Ediacaran fauna (because their niches based on microbial mats disappeared) and an increased abundance of nutrients, oxygenation of the soils and new niches needed for the Cambrian explosion. Besides, it fits the fossil data...

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes most probably there are more than one factors causing this, but for the sake of a relatively short video these are left out.

    • @johntillman6068
      @johntillman6068 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Ediacaran fauna largely fed on microbial mats. Their extinction is connected with the disappearance of these seafloor mats.

  • @whynottalklikeapirat
    @whynottalklikeapirat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I did. I don't want to divulge too much, but it involves eating A LOT of sauerkraut ...

  • @itravellight
    @itravellight 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating! Well done video.

  • @moominm1037
    @moominm1037 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow that's animals & stuff

    • @cheeseycheezy
      @cheeseycheezy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But we still in the ocean, hey can we go on land?
      No
      Why?
      THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER

  • @melvinthompson6702
    @melvinthompson6702 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Divine intervention.

  • @usuarionormal6778
    @usuarionormal6778 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *WOW THATS ANIMALS AND STUFF*

  • @empireofchaos3770
    @empireofchaos3770 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Heat is also a factor, after long, gigantic ice ages, the warming of the oceans made masses of life possible...