Evolution & Classification of Life | From Single Celled Bacteria to Humans
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2024
- Buy the chart:
usefulcharts.com/products/evo...
"An Annoying Quirk Of Our Evolution" by Stefan Milo:
• An Annoying Quirk Of O...
CREDITS:
Chart: Matt Baker
Script/Narration: Matt Baker
Animation: Syawish Rehman
Audio Editing: Jack Rackham
Model for Felis catus: Matt's cat Milo (currently 16 years old)
Model for Canis lupus familiaris: Matt's sister's dog Thunder (R.I.P.)
Intro music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com
This is a bonus video (remake of an old one). New video still scheduled for Wednesday. Be sure to check out Stefan's video here: th-cam.com/video/WSSmJLb468k/w-d-xo.html
Are you from Boston? That is wicked!
High Ground: Let me educate you some there buddy. It is wickedAWsome (one word) with women and children around and wicked pissa (two words) with the guys.
UsefulCharts where are the hedgehogs 🦔 (aim squirt gun) if you wanna live tell me where dem hedhogs is
there should technically be a couple splits on the Human section as Modern humans are hybrids of the original Human genus and 1 of the other 2 Neanderthal and Denisoven; with Genetic evidence of another yet undiscovered species. Different Areas of the world have different Hybrid roots. East Asians and European ancestry is Hybrid of Neanderthal and Human for example. South Africa has evidence of Hybrid of another and Southern Mid Asia area Dinesoven etc....
UsefulCharts this is a load of BS, don´t spread missinformation, either because you don´t know any better yourself, or you simplify the wrong way! 1) MOST bacteria DO NOT cause ANY HARM in humans... take some time to actually read up on what you´re talking about. FYI there are more bacterial cells in the human body than human cells and MOST are obligatory and beneficial. Same thing for other animals and for ecosystems. 2) there is an "endosymbiosis" crosslink between bacteria and eucaryotes, but in your simple mind plants just "have a special part" thats green. So obviously you never heard of the endosymbiosis of cyano bacteria BEFORE these then became chloroplasts....
Finally, a family tree I’m a part of
*sweet home Alabama intensifies*
@Rockin Robin You mean Family Circle.
Aquillifer you mean circle of kin
@@kyleperlman IT'S THE CIIIRCLE OF SEEEE-
Hahahaha...you guys are crazy.
Imagine being that random guy that gets to represent the entire human race
If not a complete honor...
I think it's the guy from "the God's must be crazy". BTW the best movie of all time.
@@peters972 Sadly Nǃxau ǂToma passed away in 2003 :(
It should be Tom Hanks
Many will. Right now we have a single common ancestor, but in the near future, when more and more ancestry lines eventually connect, that common ancestor will come closer to our time. Well, perhaps not closer, but at least down at least one generation and ahead in time. This process of common ancestors has always moved forward and will always continue to do so, unless should humans completely evolutionarily diverge for some reason.
This is the definition of quality content, explained so even a tolder could understand it, yet really fascinating.
some toddler like you? lol
Ah, the most complicated Royal dynasty to chart... The Animal Kingdom
But does it connect to Charlemagne?
😂
He’s on it technically...
Yes.
@@esequieltovar4955 useful charts made a video about how everyone that has European ancestry is connected to Charlemagne
Are you dumb? Everything connects to charlemagne
I’m probably in the minority but I would have liked to have seen more discussion of the plant kingdom.
JED 1977 I mean plants are incredible things if you really think about it. They’ve really got the jackpot with the whole photosynthesis shit, and their the lynchpin in all of earth’s ecosystems
@Brazilian Goddess kkkkkk boa
Same! I was sad when he suddenly skipped to the animal kingdom before finishing the plants :(
I’m probably even more in minority as I love a fungi and that conversation barely even happened lol
They are amazing im primarily fascinating by ferns and conifers.
I just got this chart for my birthday.
Spent an hour with my kids trying to sound smart answering their questions.
Quality of print and cardstock is really good.
Thank you so much.
1:52 coronavirus: sars and mers
me: laughs in 2020.
coronavirus is sars cov 2
@@dollynho8599 your pfp is kinda cursed
@@dollynho8599 or rather: covid-19 (sars-cov-2), is a sars coronavirus
This is less a chart and more a work of art. I have bought it for my office! I love it! Could this style be adapted to a family tree? Very cool! Well done and love your content!
I think some ppls family tree would be much more complex lol
@@teeniequeenie8369 At least most family trees can be proven. The evolutionary tree continues to be built by man with very little physical evidence. Evolution has already been decided by the biggest and best schools. Most civilized governments are on board.
Edits in the “tree” are constantly being made to make it fit the desired result.
I stopped believing in Evolution about 10 years ago. I could no longer believe in a process that man had built. Creation makes better sense and resembles the fossil record better. There’s just too much order on earth and in the universe that only an intelligent being could create.
@@teeniequeenie8369dave suggest that we should use a similar methodology ti our family trees and only label the people we care about. UsefulCharts deliberately left out billions of species and just labeled the few species we actually care about.
Great chart! It's kinda outdated because it's based on the classic systematics and not so much the modern understanding of species relations. Here are a few annotation, that would be important in my view:
That animal/fungus divide is outdated. Both come from opisthokonts with amoebozoa being a sister group to both kingdoms.
Protostomes can be divided into spiralia and ecdysozoans. This is kind of important because both nematodes and arthropods belong to the group of ecdysozoans. They ”split” from the other protosomes when they developed the enzyme ecdysone. The spiralia encompass the remaining groups (plathelminthes, mollusca, annelida) besides the chaetognata. I say this because on the map this relationship doesn't become clear.
And the arthropods are missing some key names like crustaceans and Chelicerata. Also the Diplopoda and Chilopoda are more closely related to insects than the other land-dwelling arthropods (because of their trachea).
And the reptile class is so fucked up; I don't know how to reorder them myself correctly... But it technically doesn't even exist as a monophyletic group. It's more a collection of all the scale-bearing, air-breathing animals. But how you showed them is very convenient and how you would use the term in a colloquial sense.
Overall tho, this is a very nice production. The only real ”flaw” is the one with the animals/fungi.
PS: also, the eucaryotes themselves come from archaea. This could have been shown more clearly.
Thanks for taking the time to give suggestions for improvements. I do relatively small print runs of the poster and therefore will try to make some changes in future to make it more up to date.
UsefulCharts sure. If there are questions let me know and I'll hook you up with some suggestions for reading material
COVID19
@@UsefulCharts I know it's much later, and has probably been said already, but I think Crocodiles and Pterosaurs should be swapped in position as well. Both Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs are Avemetatarsalia, while Crocodiles and Dinosaurs are both Archosaurs and share a more distant ancestor.
Also I think we now order Cetaceans as part of Artiodactyla rather than a sister taxa, though this one is debatable.
Very minor fixes I hope! Our understanding of ancient life changes every year so there's no way to never make any mistakes.
I came for this comment. I have small issues with fungi kingdom. I wish it would be separated better (molds and mushrooms don’t belong in the same phylum) kingdom fungi is a catch all phylum of very unrelated groups. and I’m a little uncomfortable with the beginning of the eukaryote lineage, archaea could have been shown connected to this.
I ordered the poster for my classroom and showed the video in all of my classes (6th-12th grades). I was so pleased with how much my students enjoyed it. Billions of years coherently reduced to 15 educational and entertaining minutes.
Way to spread lies and brain wash kids
I was I had something like this in school when I was a kid, took me years off curious learning to start to piece together a greater timeline of how the evidence currently suggests it all went down. When I was in school they would always get to far into the details and not enough about the big picture so I would get bored since I didn't know how it fit into anything.
After watching thousands of video and documentaries i finally understood how really evolution worked
That's sad, because I learned all of this stuff in the 7th grade...
@@JRandaII The spread of knowledge is not sad bro.
Funny to think that the mildew I kill in my shower is a distant cousin. One cell evolved one way, and the other another, and that has made all the difference.
Svoon V no, common ancestor. No one has demonstrated or provided evidences yet that a “designer” was involved.
@Svoon V then it's a designer without a degree
@Svoon V if so then that designer is akin to a child snashing his head against a wall.
Great collaborino!
Where were the tuataras?
stupid sexy Flanders....
Balochistan tree 🎄
@@jesusjoseph1899 Tuataras split from the group that would lead to lizards and snakes after they diverged from crocodiles. If they were included on this chart, they would be on the end of a line that connected to the squamate line after it diverged from the rest of the reptile class.
YES! YES! YEEEEES!!! I've been literally searching for a nice looking tree of life poster for decades and it's so much more beautiful than I ever could've imagined! It even has classifications!!
And it doesn't stop there, it comes with not one but two TH-cam videos explaining it! I'M SO SO HAPPY!!! :D :D :D
This is no doubt going to be one of the best purchases I've ever made! Thank you for this!
There is no proof for evolution.
Have you ever seen a slightest evidence of some animal species changing to another species? Even a little bit? No you haven't. Nobody has. Fossils give evidence for evolution only in evolutionists' imagination.
Organisms can only produce their own species. Humans have developed hundreds of dog races. Is it evolution? Of course not. They are all dogs and have no chance to ever produce anything else than more dogs. Unfortunately, the more you breed new dog races the more they get hereditary diseases. That is devolution, not evolution.
The species we currently see around in nature can produce many subspecies. Is it evolution? No, it is not evolution. It is devolution. Each subspecies is a specialized one and specialization comes from genetic specialization. Genetic specialization means that in the reproduction individuals lose some less important genes and the best genes for the new environment become dominant. Sounds good and is good - for a while at least. However the recessive genes gradually disappear from the genome. If the environment changes again, adaptation is more difficult than in the stem species. The end result can be - and often is - extinction of the subspecies.
In the worst of the cases the stem species become rare and may disappear. This is happening all the time in the nature.
@@jounisuninen Since your first question shows so obviously that you don't know how evolution by natural selection actually works, I didn't even bother to read the rest of your response.
But I do want to answer your first question, because I'm bored at the moment.
Evolution by natural selection doesn't state that one animal gives birth to a completely different animal. So no, you're right, I haven't seen that happening and as a matter of fact nobody has seen that happening, because that is not how it works. (There is no crocoduck, do your research)
In evolutionary biology we talk about a different specie when the offspring of two animals isn't capable of reproducing itself. For example: a lion and a tiger, that share a recent common ancestor, can reproduce and produce a liger. This liger is however incapable of reproducing with either a lion or a tiger or another liger. Therfore a lion and tiger are two different species.
Another way of looking at it is to take me as an example. I'm a 44 year old white man from The Netherlands, but when I was born I didn't look anything like I do now. So you can make the same argument as you're making before. Baby Stephan looks completely different from old and bald Stephan. Did anyone see the Stephan that was in between? No! So they must be different right?
Actually there never was an between. I changed very slowly, day by day, into the Stephan I'm today. That is how evolution works. Every generation is slightly different than the one before, and the differences are to small to notice between two generations.
Even if had a picture of myself made every single minute of my life and you lay all those pictures next to eachother, than you will see no difference between two pictures that are next to eachother but you will see a very big difference when you look at one picture and than a picture that is 10.000 pictures in the past.
Also, you can take two pictures that are 1 minute next to eachother and ask: yeah, but where is the picture in between? There isn't any. That is why your question is so stupid...
So... here is what I'm suggesting... Please take a look at the TH-cam channel of Potholer54, it will take you about a couple of hours to finish it, but after that you'll understand what evolutionary biologists are actually claiming and you'll stop asking such shamefully bad questions that makes you look like every other creationist TH-cam commentor with a small weeny! DO YOUR RESEARCH!!!
You didn’t mention the archaea factor in the eukaryan origin. Not only bacteria, because we have more archaeal genes than bacterial genes.
So THATs why we test rats... I didn’t know they were so closely related! To us!
true, we are like big rats
we have over 90% similar dna with mice
J. Hypolite We also share 50 % of our DNA with bananas.
A true misfortune for the rats to be so closely dna related to us. They became guinea pigs for lab experiments.
have tests on humans they are the closest relatives of the human
rodents are more related to humans than dogs and cats
really makes you think
Makes sensse
It makes sense though since rats were smart enough to survive the extinction of the dinosaurs.
What blew my mind is we are more related to starfish than to worms
@@snapdrakon533 starfishes have 5 spikes head and 4 limbs
rodents are more like democrats
UsefulCharts: I won't go over viruses now, how important can that be?
2020: Challenge accepted
TOP COMMENT
@@Electr0fleur Aw, thanks! Here's to a better roll of the dice this year!
The most educative video I've ever seen on TH-cam so far. I love this channel. Great job!
Ahh, taking me back to high school biology. Fond memories, thanks mate.
Also as someone from South Africa; its nice to see people talk about human evolution. Its mentioned alot here with all the fossil finds. Also happen to go to the university where it is the centre of research in South Africa, so will hopefully get to check it out by the end of this year.
Love ur name
@@AdityaSingh-lp5rp thanx my man
Aren't people super Religulous there, like the rest of Africa?
Damn. I was supposed to go there this summer for a paranthropus dig site
@@davidbenny1149 dumb question
As a biologist i gotta say This chart is really good! Some nitpicking aside it's going to be very helpful in helping people understand our family tree. Interresting to put Eukaryotes outside of Archaea in light of recent discoveries surrounding Asgard Archaea. Also, using a picture of a Dunkleosteus for jawed fish before mentioning boney fish is a bit strange. The Decision to leave out Diapsids and skip to Sauropsids is an interresting one, i suppose it saves time but I'm so glad that you grouped Turtles with them and didn't put them into an Anapsid phylum.
As a microbiologist I gotta say this chart is really bad. There are a lot of things bad, and very important ones.
@@Ignasimp The guy is obviously not a biologist so it's an attempt. Atleast he didn't put prokaryotes in the animal kingdom. The dotted line of chloroplasts to LEKA is a bit weird though.
@@spambaconeggspamspam for me the biggest problem is that it still uses the kingdoms, which aren't used anymore. Plants and green algae are in the Arechaeplastidia category but a lot of other algae aren't in that group. And fungus and animals are Opistokonta and are very closely related. And there are other big groups like Chromalveolata and Heterokonta.
@@Ignasimp Also grouping Sauropods with Therapods, while not even mentioning Herrerasaurus - the dinosaur that that controversial relationship relies on is a misstep, IMO.
Rick Mulders where are the hedgehogs this all I care about and no I’m not a sonic fan but I just wanna know where the fricken hedgehogs are smart man
One of the most concise informative videos I've ever watched! Absolutely fascinating and I just shared it with all of my friends on Facebook.
This is AMAZING. Thank you we've been looking for something like this for a while. Brilliant work!
Scientist: Cynodonts
Me, an intellectual: Dino dogo
not that far off the mark! 'Cyno' means dog!
@@KlavierMenn thanks for the clarification
Fred Flintstone's pet, Dino, only he called him a "Snorkasaurus".
Cynodonts = "dog toothed"
Wow, dude! Nice chart. I can not only appreciate the enormous amount of work in figuring out what is what but also the work you put into laying out your chart to rep it. Thank you!
This chart is amazing. So much work in this one. Good job!
Fun facts: deer are closer relatives to a blue whale than to a horse; mushrooms are closer relatives to humans than to trees.
Even crazier is that whales are in fact within Artiodactyl (despite what the chat says). Hippos and I believe also pigs, and more closely related to Whales than they are to deer or cows.
@@brendanharan4501, deer are closer relatives to blue whales than to horses; by at tens of millions of years.
Tuna is more closely related to humans than to sharks
@@nabilzig3797, never knew this, and am very happy to. :)
@@benderisgreat95able That's how evolution works? It's a slow process you know
Creationists left the chart.
What about believers in theistic evolution, like me
@ShalakumX Simba I was not trying to be offensive. I know this chart if based on the available evidence for how biological evolution occurred. I believe in biological evolution. I was trying reference how people can believe in God and Evolution (I do) in a humorous way to respond. I am sorry if I made you upset in some way.
Actually, we didn't. I'm here to see if evolution has yet to explain how single celled organisms came to be in existence BEFORE the "Life" category he mentioned in the video. I got my answer in the first 1:40s. Evolution fails again. You can't create something from nothing. If evolution can't explain the WHOLE story, its an incomplete theory. Evolution therefore FAILS to tell us exactly when life began. Until evolution theories can explain how you create something from nothing, I'll hold to my beliefs. Things and people can "evolve", but they have to exist first in order for that to happen. People have always been people, animals have always been animals, BUT an animal cannot just magically turn into a person and a person cannot magically turn into an animal. Animal cells only turn into more "evolved" versions of themselves and human cells can only turn into more "evolved" versions of themselves. Humans ARE mammals, but we aren't "animals" like a tiger or an elephant. We are simply mammals with a much higher sence of intelligence, existence and self awareness, whereas, animals operate on instinct, although are very intelligent...just not on a human level. Am I saying evolution is ALL b.s.? NO. I'm just saying that it has a ton of contradictions and gaps. Following evolution to explain what happened AFTER cells evolved is fine, but to follow it as some sort of weird, "anti-religion" religion? Yeah, it doesn't make sense. I'm a firm believer in creation, but its the science that can explain creation with the HELP of evolution theory. It makes no sense to me to separate the two if they can help explain each other. There are gaps in BOTH. But if we use both creation and evolution to explain each of them, I think it'll fill in more of those gaps. Even more so if we add in history. A person CAN believe in more than one theory and still be a good Atheist or a good Christian. I'm pretty sure evolution can't explain where the ability to love came from but the bible does an equally bad job at explaining its fair share too. I just think we need to fairly start looking at and considering both if we are ever going to intellectually "evolve" as human beings.
@@ln2559 There are many theories for how life was first formed, such as the RNA World Hypothesis, they are just outside the scope of this video. The video producer actually explained that people can look up abiogenesis to get more information.
I believe in God, but I also believe that at some point, whether it was God or not, something had to be self-existent, which means it always was existing outside of time, or it came from nothing.
No scientist is saying that different species magically become one another. The theory of evolution is straight forward, over time some of the changes in genes help a specific population to better survive and pass on the genes that helped them survive, and as these changes, which are different for different populations (and sub-populations, and population splits, and population mergers, etc...), pile up over massive amounts of time, they become so different that they are different species, and this process continues over and over again.
The way I imagine God creating us, is that he birthed the Universe into creation (through the Big Bang), knowing full-well the conditions and outcome would create life on Earth through some process of abiogenesis, and then when it came time to create humankind, he simply chose an existing species of animal, a type of great ape, homo sapien sapien (maybe an even earlier hominid ancestor of homo sapien sapien and other hominids), and gave them a spirit made in the image of God (not a body in the image of God). It is actually an amazing act of worship to try to understand the processes of the natural world, that theists like myself believe God created, and how those processes led to us. However, there is no way to prove or disprove God, I believe in God because of my faith, but I do not expect others to also believe in God. Also, a good number of our behaviors come from neurological wiring found in our closest non-human relatives, and many animals display intelligent behavior.
I am not going to be responding to this thread anymore, because a previous commenter was right, that my comment about theistic evolution was not relevant enough to either the video or the original comment, and I do not want to get into arguments right now. However, I felt I needed to respond to your comment. This is not meant as an attack on you, just a well-meaning response to where I think you may be wrong.
@@ln2559 a cell is just nucleic acid within a phospholipid bilayer, and we already know those could form in primordial conditions...so..quit being irrational i guess.
This chart is what I needed before I even knew it! An absolute treasure, seriously. So many thanks.
This chart is based on imagination, nothing else.
Nope. How unfortunate that your education was so limited, both in the facts of science and in logical debate. Sad.
brainlets : Look, a bird!
me, an intellectual : ave
True to Caesar
the singular is avis
In spanish you can still call em aves! LOL
Me, an even more enlightened intellectual: *descendants of the lizard hipped dinosaurs*
Oh dear, that was the most useful chart I have seen on TH-cam. Commentary was also very useful :) Thanks!
I've been looking for a video that summarizes the tree of life in a simple, easy to understand way and that is also inclusive of all eras and branches and this is it! Thank you for creating this. I have subscribed to your channel to not miss more videos like this one.
Well done!
Wtf are you doing here lmao
@@StagMods bro
As with all of your videos this is an absolutely lucid and entertaining overview of an exceptionally complicated topic. Thanks for all of the work you put into all of these videos and for sharing your knowledge.
This is an amazingly simple but detailed video. Excellent work
This is fantastic! What a great walk through! Also, you kept it professional making it a great video for children and adults alike. 👏
This is some amazing work 👏👏👏 Hats off 🙌
Excellent videos and charts. Keep them coming.
Brilliant! Just loved the video, the best I have seen so far! Please keep up the good work.
Very nice! If you decide to update this chart, I would recommend including some geographic detail such as the arrangement of the continental plates when the taxon first appears. This would be useful for understanding why some types of land animals are present in some parts of the world, while absent anywhere else.
I'm sure this video will not spark any arguments in the comments whatsoever!
Omgoodness. Two of my favorite TH-camrs collaborating. I love it.
Fabulous!! Thank you very much for creating this awesome chart and making a good video about it, too.
wow, your channel has grown a lot, still remember seeing that British royal family tree a year ago
Look at the youtuber jelly 21 mil subs
This is great. Thanks so much. I'm a huge fan of evolution and science and this is great.
Your useful charts are beyond outstanding. The videos also Thank You
Thank you. your chart is so easy to read and understand. I found your site through google images and I chose this one becasues the chart even stood out in amongst the other charts. Vet fascinating, I found the way you described what it is saying really interesting. you summed up millions of years of evolution really well for a vid of this length. I listened to the other cid you recomended too and subscribed to both.
It's incredible that we're all part of the same system, we share genetic material with other creatures across the Planet now and from millions of years ago. I love history, it's fascinating. Thanks for this video ;-)
Yes we are... and we are torturing them to death.
Its you not me.
*billions of years
I love how you can see a tiger and some potatoes and know that both came from the same eukaryote domain.
Excellente content! This is the first video of yours I watched and I am already subscribed. Great job!
This is an amazing lesson and your chart is gorgeously done⭐️
Gorgeous but nothing to do with science and facts.
so out of 165k people, there are only 210 Creationist's
Good job humanity you're getting smarter
Maybe not creationists, but ones who know that classification don't look like this bullshit for a long time
@Apollo Jones idk what he’s talking about.
Literally no one knows what he's talking about
It's sad what has happened to mankind. Rebellion against the creator God. Everyone can choose who they will believe. But saying there is no God makes you a fool.
@@christinejoseph3366 I never implicated that god doesn't exist - I personally neither know nor really care - I was pointing out that the theory of creationism as an idea is absurd.
To anyone saying that "something cannot come from nothing":
A. That is not in the scope of this video. You're thinking about abiogenesis, which the director of the video mentions.
B. You're probably religious and think creationism explains everything. Applying the same logic of the sentence above, where did your supposed god come from?
I had to make this since I couldn't respond to many people's ignorant and unwarranted "critiques" of the chart or even the idea of evolution itself.
Great graphical representation of evolution. Just the right balance of enough detail to make it understandable without too much clutter, great job.
Unfortunately it has nothing to do with reality. Study a bit of genetics and you'll realize why.
@@jounisuninen what?
What a PHENOMENAL video! Thank you! I salute you!
Proto-mitochondria entered an Archaea, the proto-mitochondria became mitochondria and then it's an Eukaryote. So Eukaryotes were Archaea.
Yes, there are quite a few important things in this chart that are incorrect.
Such as?
@@metachirality exactly, Fungus and animalia are part of the Optistokonta. And plants and some gropus of algae are part of the Archaeplastida.
@@UsefulCharts many mistakes
Great job....thanks for all the hard work. I find it interesting to think that the cells in my body have been dividing since that very first cell divided billions of years ago...
Not possible.
That was great man..could never been better.
1st time on channel. Amazing! So much science in 20 minutes. Thanks.
14:43 Humans did not evolve from Chimpanzees. This explanation right here I think would clear up a lot of confusion around the subjection.
So many people still parrot the phrase "we came from chimps". That then causes so many people to emphasize the massive difference between us and the argument escalates from there.
Actually it was disinformation spread by the churches and other enemies of Darwin.
Religious people usually don't believe the Darwin theory, some believe, but most of them are don't believe that we came from Chimpanzees
Yes, some believe, but then not much, maybe much, but most of the time they're don't believe about it
Can someone explain how we came from a single celled threory of evolution?. If our ancestor came from a single celled how did they survive from embryo to adulthood? Scientifically theories any species can't survive from infant to adult without its parents and a cell can't evolved into adult without prenancy stage. Pls respect.
@@kumastrawarlord5282 There exist lots of single cell organisms that are pretty capable of surviving on they're own. As time went on there were organism that came upon the strategy of sticking together after multiplying. This proved beneficial as it provided some safety from from other organisms that would want to eat them and let the cell resources. And again as time went on the grouped cells adapted into speciation. Having different cells specialise in different things lets each of those cells perform their jobs better instead of just doing everything a bit (it's the same idea behind modern production methods in factories). And as time went on the cells grew more dependent on each other to the point where they can't survive without each other aside from very specific enviroments.
I wanna have this printed out as a poster and put on my bedroom wall, amazing.
There's a link at the top where you can buy it
@@gslgregory thanks alot !
Fabulous chart! Thanks.
Awesome! You made this so simple... Thanks!
in before the comments get flooded with science deniers.
brett exactly the far left is very active denying science we must be vigilant
Ruminations from the Trailer Park No. just stop.
Communism is the future I see a proponent of dialectical materialism (I assume you know what that is) speaks up! Excuse me if I ignore your hate
Ruminations from the Trailer Park Feel free to ignore, the rest of us will focus on actual science and facts.
Communism is the future I think you are missing the entire point about communism and the philosophy of dialectical materialism. “Ignoring actual science and facts” is inherent to communism since truth is only that which suits the communist regime. I personally love the “truth” and that is why I could never be a socialist or a communist
Love the video. Ordered this chart and the alternative chart of the elements. Looking for a chart of geological time and the movement and grouping of the continents.
this is true quality content. keep it up mate!
This was very interesting. Wonderfull to see in such a handy chart from where all life comes from and all the directions it took.
That rabbit is a special kind of beast.
Is there a way to buy, or otherwise obtain, a high-res DIGITAL version of the poster? I'd like to use it, but don't want to deal with a printed item. Thanks!
This reminded me of my biology class and this is my favorite topic so I loved to study this topic but this video is 10x more interesting than that lesson so thank you Useful Charts! ♥️
That was absolutely fabulous, thank you very much
I’ve always been curious where Ediacrian Biota fits in the tree of life. Whether it would be a separate kingdom or if they are proto-animals etc.
I find Edicacrian biota super interesting and would love for answers to be one day conclusively given though as the fossils are so rare and are only impressions left by soft tissue as there were no hard parts to fossilise properly, I doubt answers will be conclusively given but here’s hoping!
Me too!
It would be really cool to view this as an interactive map
Well, there already were interactive Tree Of Life maps on the internet.
Great job. This is something that is actually useful and not just the standard mindless click bait, that TH-cam is known for.
I’d love this. Loved in you dive deeper into these
Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs are also thought to be warm blooded; much like modern birds. Mammals/Cynodontis may still be the first to get warm blood, but this doesn't make mammals unique. Many dinosaurs lived in arctic/snowy environments, and many scientists believe that the proto-feathers found on many dinosaurs were for insulation much like the fur of a mammal. (amazing chart and video btw! I'm just a dino nerd :p)
The most clever evolutionists have started to declare that "we do not need the fossil evidence anymore". Why? Because it is already proven that there are no scientifically valid transitional fossils. They are jumping off the evolutionary train ... 😄
When you said who you’re collaborating with I thought you were about to say Stephan molyneaux and I almost died in fear
Had to Google that name. Yikes.
@@UsefulCharts Don't trust what you read on Wikipedia
Wikipedia has been total bullshit for years now.
@@UsefulCharts Me too
@@jessrevill1852 Wikipedia is great for things of an objective nature. If you want to know the vapor point of water at STP, Wikipedia is a great starting point. If you want to know about political theory, Wikipedia is worse than useless.
plss never stop uploading this channel is my new drug
I ordered this poster and received it within 2 weeks all the way over in New Zealand. Arrived in mint condition & was well packaged. Thanks Useful charts!!
Aron Ra has a playlist(almost done) that covers humanities history from single cell. So for details check it out.
I WANT THAT POSTER!!!!!!
Dude, that was excellent. Thank you.
I just wanted to say thank you, this is amazing
Bravo 👏 Useful Charts. Where were you when I was taking biology in college?
Probably in Sri Lanka.
If that is where you were about 18 years ago. 😬
Can you do a chart family tree for all homonids?
That would be so cool.
Boring. Humans and apes are boring. Mammals in general are much more interesting.
Although I would admit that what hunans and apes DO are more interesting than what other mammals do.
A wonderful clip. Thank you.
Wow! This was so insightful. Thank you!
I've watched this like ten times. Love it.
I didn't know that about dolphins and whales, evolving because they went back into the sea
whales actually have legs in their skeleton, an artefact from an earlier terrestrial form. :)
Same with seals, sea-lions, walruses etc. Except from a different branch at a different time. I mean it's pretty obvious they're related to dogs and bears. Just look at those whiskers!
But yeah apparently the closest living relative to hippos are whales. Something like that. Kinda mindblowing.
@@PiousMoltar
Next up to bat as a totally marine Mammal with no links left to land, the Sea Otter.
They have managed to beat need for land nesting by birthing at sea, carrying Junior on Mama's belly.
Oh really how thick are you ive know it for 40yrs
Finally I found my timeline to learn. Thanks you for your incredible effort and thank TH-cam algorithms.
Love your videos! thank you. Wish you would do more maps!
5:05 your "ok, what we..." opens my google assisten for some reasons xD
Fungi and animals are related in a group called Opistokonta, also there are many more divisions within eukarya
Yes. Eukaryotes are divided in two directions really. One is from which came euglena, kinetoplasts and algae (which includes oomycetes, brown algae, red algae and PLANTS or green algae plus embryophytes) among others. Another from which came amoebozoa (many "typical" amoebas and the slime mold visible to naked eye) and opisthokonts (fungi, choanoflagellates and animals) among others. Plus the dashed line from cyanobacteria should be to the algal lineage only. And of course, eukaryotes are really asgard archaea (with a bunch of alpha bacteria).
@@snigdha8404 I don’t re,ember the name of the bacteria right now, but the group it’s in starts with an h and the mitochondria might have evolved from that group, yes chloroplasts likely evolved from Cyanobacteria. I’m curious what the other organelles came from. I heard ribosomes are made of RNA and are a ribozyme which is basically RMA acting like an enzyme if I remember correctly
Hi, I am from Uganda. And I am a big fan of life. So me watching this explaining about life. It was interesting. And I really want to share it with my people who do not understand English. I was asking for permission to allow me translate. This in our local language in Uganda. For my people, thank you.
Revisiting this video, and didn’t remember that you collaborated with Stefan ! Being a more recent subscriber to him, and a fan of both of you, it’d be great to see more collabs !!
He's one of my favorite TH-camrs. And a nice guy to boot!
When a Useful Charts video pops up in my notifications: (:
This is incredibly informative!! Thank you! Also, it would be interesting to see a future video of a more in-depth exploration of the plant kingdom tree tho.
OMG - that chart is out of this world! I must buy it!