To Sonali's point that will be actively discussed in the comment section, I just wanted to say:- The point is not about ALL WOMEN, MOST WOMEN or SOME WOMEN but a generalised take that gets said on a public platform which is subjective and cannot be analytically proven. Its just a standard you set dependent on your experiences, it does not mean its universally true!
Fuck yes!! Thank you....for addressing this. She has her right to her opinion...but to make generalised statements in public about an entire gender is a little irresponsible especially in a country that's patriarchal in nature!!!
Okay, according to your argument, Kajol is also wrong. Why does dhe generalize all politicians when there are still many politicians who are well-educated? But no, Kajol is right, and Sonali is wrong!
Brother I agree with most of the opinion you put out but it will be a surprise to you how many girls are there who exactly are what sonali said and metropolis population is not majority so most of the female population in suburban or rural areas are incompetent and work only to get husbands just get a report in the Hindu that was published search it
To be honest, I do see her perspective too. Because we still believe a suitable groom is one who earns more than the bride to be. When looking for prospective guys on martrimony websites, I have noticed a lot of women in my own circle looking for guys who are financially stable and are earning more than they do. My thinking is different and fortunately my family and in laws are both of the 'it's a partnership either way' thinking. But nonetheless, I was shocked to hear these opinions almost everywhere around me. While there's nothing wrong with marrying a guy who earns more/less than you, making it a base criteria while searching for a groom is sadly a common practice.
What Kajol said is correct though. Some ppl ruling the country don't have the education/qualifications for ruling the country. Ppl calling Kajol uneducated, she might be a school-dropout, but she's not ruling and making decisions for the country. Acting is her profession and she's amazing at that! The ppl who troll her for expressing her opinions later troll her for apologizing after. C'mon, the media made such a big deal out of it, she had to apologize to keep the media circling around her statement🙄
Education se jyada experience and administrative capabilities matter karti hai . Also ppl ruling the country are very educated just check there education properly .check the education of all ministers once .
People talk about "qualifications to rule" but what are these qualifications? Saying XYZ degree is very arbitrary. If the point is "education is important cos it gives you perspective" then that perspective matters in every field - including acting. And the fact that Kajol didn't feel the need to find that perspective in own career only makes her seem like a hypocrite.
Her husband is selling Pan masala and this school dropout comes out to preach about education. Isn’t it because of ppl like her husband, this country is getting exploited? You know how much tax pan masala companies pay to government. Her husband is promoting it, this doesn’t need education, its common sense. Still they are doing it being aware of its lethal affects, they are pretty much like the politicians, everyone is exploiting like her husband. More than education ppl need common sense which she clearly lacks. 😒
Kajol was making a valid point though about why education is important in politics and when she apologized for her statement she ironically proved her point😅
@@vinnienanda how is her not clearing 10th grade relevant to what she said? She's not holding public office nor making policies, nor running the country. Also, standardized school learning is not the only form of education, nor are marks everything. I know plenty of people that scored As in their theory exams but know jack-shit about real life and struggle in the real world.
I want to comment on Arjun Kapoor's statement of trolling him is also indirectly trolling the historical figure he portrayed in the movie Panipat. Dear Arjun, Sadashiv Rao Bhau was insulted when you were casted for portraying his role.
With arjun his performances are not consistent to the point of one can move from constructive criticism to trolling. Theres nothing that'll help him realize his flaws and seems like he knows people are just insulting him now. His lack of good performance is a result of his own mistakes.
A lot of people said that Kajol herself is just 10th pass and therefore she is no one to make that statement. But she's not the one running the country or responsible for the economy. Every citizen of this country educated or not deserves to have well educated leaders governing the country.
If u don't want uneducated leaders then don't vote them But it is not correct thing to take away right of people to get elected as adminstator but leaders must be atleast 12 pass
you dont need to be educated to be a leader. you need to have leadership qualities to be a leader. its not just he pm or president that runs the government. theres a cabinet of ministers appointed by him and each has a huge team under them. and the chain continues. learn the basics of how a government works before talking lol.
@@bruhmantri2074i think he knows the basics . Yes you need leadership qualities to be a leader. Right agreed but at the same time education does give you a wider perspective, morals , more philosophy you can look into and choose or make your own philosophy and not merely your upbringing give you a one sided idea of the world. Ofcourse it is not a given but it does surely help . Of all the people now praising Jai Shankar as the best foreign minister, why do you think that is - because he is qualified for the job not just reading out what his staff give him . Atleast a political science and philosophy degree would do good for being a leader that has control over many people
@@abhinavmaharaj4804 if you think being educated and having a degree is that important ? Having basic education is enough. You don't need to be some IITian to be the PM. politics works on policies. Policies are made from experiences. Experience is gained from being on the ground.
It is absolutely unfair to judge other women based on what we perceive with our (often) privileged notions. I see it all the time in maddening white upper-class feminist discourse. Not all women are able to fight for the same things, sometimes there's just way too many other things including societal conditioning, circumstances, etc. that make their situation the way it is. You may not understand someone's situation, but you ought to at least give them the benefit of the doubt. Also, most women are not simply sitting while their husbands are working. Domestic labor is also incredibly important labor which unfortunately gets overlooked often. Even assuming something about the experiences of an entire group of people based on one anecdotal experience shows internal prejudices that already existed.
But she clearly said that *some* women are lazy and it's true...there are lazy People and women happen to be some of them.. not all "failed" people are a result of society and circumstances. Some are just pure their own doing.
True. She thinks managing the household work is being "lazy" lol. Kudos to those women who are working and also managing house, but the homemakers also should be credited. I won't let anyone say that my mom doesn't do any work at home. Man she does more than anybody else in the house
Being lazy is not a gender thing I think? Are some men not lazy? Not calling househusbands lazy though, it's their own choice which I respect. So that's the point, lazy hona ya na hona is a Choice much?
to be fair Sonali did not say “Some Homemaker” she only said Some Women… how everyone here has decided that she was talking about women who take care of the house… And Jammy you know what is to e deaf ??? The media, the judiciary and the people in power turning a blind eye to the misuse of gender biased law in our country.
My skin crawled when I heard the disgusting comments made by Robo towards Hamsika. Absolutely lewd and lecherous. What was worse, like jammy pants rightly pointed out, nobody had the balls to stop him. This shows the lack of consequences. Why isn’t he being questioned about his vile behavior. I am sure Hamsika is keeping quiet because if she opens her mouth she will lose project. Utterly disdainful and shameful!
Kajol was literally making a valid point and what's more depressing that people are saying that she herself is 10th pass. Maybe that's why Kajol said education is important.
May be try reading history of indian educational institutions after 1947.. You will get why the older generation doesn't hold a lot of degrees like us.. Why only rich could afford degree..at that time.. You will understand why politicians don't have degree.
@@kritikarathi808 Then perhaps those older people who have degrees should be the ones who should be eligible for making the decisions of our country. People are talking about educated people filling up the posts in power so at the very least they would have the minimum knowledge about certain topics and do not embarrass the entire country outside by their ignorance and pass crass statements that makes one fill bewildered about what kind of people are in position of power. This is country's government where no leniency should be shown to uneducated people and should be given seats to them out of pity
@@spdadventurer1754 really man.. 11 month old comment..😂👍 U have a very weird capacity for doing research. Have fun! I am busy doing more productive things so excuse my notification bar.
Like that made a difference,and education qualifications by themselves dont mean much in the end. I mean even thermometers have degrees,but you know where we stick them......
@@mimitabiswas4534 What difference did it make in the end ? I mean if you still believe that India got its freedom due to Gandhi and Co,you live in Lala Land.
@@Skydrow27I'm sure she washes her own dishes. Doing good work there. What about you though? Does your mom still wash your dishes and dirty underwear while you scratch your belly and eat like a pig and order everyone around to work for you?
Sonali’s privilege showed in her statement because even in many urban well-off families women don’t have the agency to make any decisions about their own lives. From not being allowed to work at all, to working in specific fields so that you can also carry out all your household chores for the whole family after work; this is the reality in our country. The situation is worse in tier 2-3 cities. Sonali’s comments on just one set of women is disrespectful to all the other women trying to make it in a man’s world.
@@aravindr740 see the thing is in 2023 I guess no mortal man (in this case a women as well) is allowed to make any comments upon the incompetance of women. let's be honest women are not ready or strong enough to accept their flaws or any criticism, they just don't hold the power for that, hence if any valid arguments are made they literally attack upon it instead of thinking it overall whether is it valid and useful or not. like lets address the elephant in the room, women disagree and disobey their parents, husband, brother every now and then.it's like a fashion. they literally don't even want to sit down and give it thought about what are they saying and are they correct or not. Since none of them want to listen anyone, none of them want to improve, why waste timing in explaining them. again when we'll try to do it they'll be like,"you are mansplaining us". anyways this is my personal opinion. I'd suggest keep your mouth shut, they are not worth saving or literally having a teeny tiny logical conversation. they are already doomed.
She mentioned some women and not all women, we can't deny the fact that it's partly true, there are many women who are well educated and do nothing, and also there are some women in tier 1 cities as well who don't do anything with per text of searching of their pathpath and eventually get married to some rich guy.
i dont know about privilege but i didnt see one single girl in my entire life who married a guy who gets a lower salary than herself. Your comment might be idealistic but it doesnt reflect reality sonalis does
@@indipacifician3693 That is because society is conditioned like that. My friend's boyfriend's family refused her as their would-be bahu because she earns more than him. they can't see their bahu earning more than their son, which is the case almost everywhere. but I hope this narrative changes soon. ruining both the genders
the funniest part about the reaction to Kajol's statement was, that anyone who reacted was basically admitting that their favoured leaders are uneducated and unqualified
Only rich women in India can afford to be lazy. Maybe Sonali K thinks this way becoz she is upper class herself and the women around her would be too. But she is forgetting that being lazy is not a luxury the rest of Indian women have. Working women usually have to handle office and home both, and anyone calling a housewife lazy has never met one. And yes many women do seek rich successful husbands, but let's not forget how many women in this country are simply not allowed to study, work or be independent. The situation is such that their husband is the only source of their social and financial capital. But yes there are women who are gold diggers in the true sense of the word, but they are undoubtedly a very small minority. A very rich woman married to a very rich man is telling the rest of Indian women to not be lazy. This moment reminded me of Kim K when she said that just get off your ass and work. The privilege dripping off of these statements is astounding.
Wrong.!! Normal women want to find rich husbands so they can be lazy and not work. That’s what’s she meant. She isn’t pointing fingers at housewives who’s are also working women. How many single girls try to find single rich guys who are loaded ? Just so they can have the luxury n be lazy..
I have noticed this thing about the southern film industry that people are very openly misogynistic and creepy towards actresses. N it is seen as something very normal. Mumbai film industry people are more evolved towards women in comparison. About the whole Ananya Pandey statement thing, I completely disagree with her but I do feel that her trolling became too toxic n nasty after a certain point which can mess the mind of a 20 yr old. That is the whole problem with social media, that discourse can transform into nasty trolling and lose all substance.
Please educate everyone on this industry you speak of. Firstly Robo Shankar is a nobody and the second guy's joke was lost in translation - he was referring to Leone dressing like a South Indian and the other actress being from the South not doing so. It's a joke. Take a hard look at the mysogyny Sunny Leone gets her way during Hindi film promotions. The South is incomparably more accepting of her past than the cheap, vulgar shit she gets asked in the North.
nah, if you are not mentally ready for social media discourse and the downfalls of the same, then dont be on the forefront of a public platform that you cant face, and dont say stupid entitled things.. the consequences of which you are not mentally resilient enough to handle yourself. Ananya Pandey is not that young or naive to not know where she stands, where she's coming from and what comes out of her mouth. These people are well-educated, well-travelled, and well-privileged. They cannot fool anyone into thinking that they are innocent or "just 20 years old". Their "innocence" is actually wilful ignorance. She is the fool, she is not fooling anybody.
@@TriedRefusedProductions STR father made an actress cry just because she couldn't satisfy his ego that he is still in his prime and he deserve the spotlight and bashed her infront of media .I completely agree with you jammy bro
Sonali made a very ignorant statement. Most Indian women are homemakers while others are working. The rich can only afford to be lazy. She put the entire blame on women as if men aren't dumping all the responsibilities of house, kids and in laws on their wives 😂
Ppl are misunderstanding her statement.. She also wasn't specific with her comment. She mainly meant those lazy nautanki girls like Sonam Kapoor who are entitled that they want a ready made man of wealth while they live off of his riches while she becomes a child bearing machine. It's 2023 and it still baffles me how women can have this much trust on men financially etc Your husband can still leave u, cheat, become Dissintersted in u etc what will u do? He got his own bag while u got nothing.. Having financial independency is important for everyone no matter gender. It's just more men usually have it than women since women still buys the idea of getting from her man when it's just setting them in risks. Whoever has money has the power. Gender roles in society is the true oppression here. Ppl are belittled bcuz of the gender stereotypes
@@vinnienandathat's not the point bcuz she's not a stay at home housewife living off of her husbands money n spending it. She is something herself. She's talking about those who don't have aspirations n goals in life yet demands rich men. It's the entitlement that she's tryna point out
@@emyf9197stay at home women don't just spend. In a society degraded to this extent where NON-financial contribution is not even SEEN or RECOGNIZED, this just adds to it. A stay at homemaker has no day off AT ALL. Not even Sundays!
I don’t know why Shahid regret’s working on Padmaavat, but I thoroughly loved watching him as Maharaja Ratwal Singh King of Mewar. He was so convincing in his performance.
He regretted because of the crisis. Bhansali getting assaulted, Deepika having a bounty on her head, riots unleashing across the country. He was scared.
I think it was because of the huge controversy that happened with the director who was beaten and protest happned this cud have probably killed his will to play that character
Because movie was about Deepika and shahid and not ranveer. Many scenes of shahid was cut off to increase scenes time of other two actors.. So he felt bad
@7:00 I actually agree with her!!! How many of our leaders actually have a scientific temperament in their approach?!!! Trolling her for this statement is such a shame especially in a so called democratic country.
Scientific temperament has no definition prescribed by the constitution. The so called democracy allows for people from all walks of life the opportunity to aspire for democratic positions. If you didn't want that then you are anti so called democracy. It's good that a sense of apathy towards democracy and universal adult franchise is developing. Authoritarianism will do well for a country like ours.
2 of India's most skilled PM- Nehru and Manmohan 🤣🤣🤣🤦🏼🤦🏼🤦🏼 If education equates high political competency then there wouldn't have ever a Kashmir issue in first place....Lol that PM invited UN to solve India's internal issue 🤣🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
@@harshraj6116India's "internal issue" involved a region that did not want to be part of India. That's like calling British colonization an "internal issue" of the British.
I would also want to mention the Amisha Patel interview where she spoke about the ott platform and mentioned how parents have to close their eyes when it comes to portraying the LGBTQ community and other things but ironically didn’t have an issue with her portrayal in the Yash raj movie where she dances to lazy Lamhe. That movie was a kids movie and there were kids in that songs 😂
it's only a problem for her to see gay people existing on screen. Her shoving her boobs in children's faces is fine(I'm not being misogynistic, simply pointing out her hypocrisy) gay people merely existing is sexual for these people, but nothing straight people do can ever be seen as bad lmao, regardless of how sexual it is.
She still made a valid point. Children in America are taking gender change surgery procedures. Because they feel they are something else. Madness is growing fast. One cant leave female/male child with other female/male friends anymore. Never know when they turn lesbians/gays.
I believe it's somewhat hypocritical of Amir to claim that the roast format does not send a positive message. I vividly recall during the promotion of Delhi Belly, when asked about the film's vulgarity and provocative dialogue, he himself stated that the movie was intended for the youth and that this generation naturally communicates in such a manner. Therefore, he deemed it completely acceptable to showcase these elements. However, when AIB performed their roast, he suddenly changed his stance.
Delhi belly promoted as 18+ film ,when it's tv premier happened , all the vulgar dialogues removed , secondly , they were characters in the movie whereas in AIB shows real celebrities and influencers are doing such type of things like mai leta hu ..tu choddta hai on public platform which neither was 18+ So there is difference.
It was uncomfortable to watch that statement by Janhvi as having the access and privilege to follow up with producers. Contrast it with interviews of talented actors like Avinash Tiwary where he mentioned having to audition for smaller roles like bulbbul and girl on the train, even after his stellar performance as the lead in Laila Majnu! It just leaves a bad taste when Nepo kids are tone deaf and unaware of pandering their privilege as struggles!
2:16 that creep exactly knew that the actress don't know that language and will act with a smile on whatever is being said. It's disturbing that no one Stop that creep in the middle of that outrageous act. Maybe because southern movie industry is habitual of such misogynist behaviour.
The comment by Rajeev would make any 'outsider' uncomfortable who is trying to make his way in the industry it gave me the same vibe of Sonam and Rajkummar Rao interview.
Kajol statement is totally a 'grey area' comment. Ofcourse, many going to assume she is talking about current government, but it's the problem of all the parties - be it BJP, Congress, or AAP. And while she has right to speak her mind or criticise the government, other people also have the rights to criticize her statement. Given she has a face that millions recognize, a statement like that will indeed attract some hate towards her, and she has to deal with that, that's what a major problem of being famous.
And if anyone supports what these IT cell trolls and apologists of political parties do, they re bastards. They were not merely criticizing her statement but calling to cancel her.
After 1947 education system was very doomed.. Not everyone had the privilege of going abroad and studying. Plz check the age bracket and the economy's education set up of time. Not having degree doesn't means you have no knowledge.. And can't join politics... Is it? Haters gone hate! No issues. Just giving logical explanation of why our previous generation don't have degrees like us.
2 min Silence for those people who still thinks that Twitter fights and controversies are genuine and not pre planned😂 Old time it looks genuine but now it's way obvious Eg Arjun Kapoor rant about napotism😂
It did him no favours tho for taking up that mantle against the abuse the industry was getting. It should have been a unified move. They eventually did stand up as a collective tho for the BS mainstream media was saying
India have one of the lowest participation of women in labour and yes many of Indian women don't wanna work and earn on their own. It's a thing that I have seen in my home , neighbour and many relatives homes In india it's mostly TRUE that women don't wanna work
Iam not surprised by what men in tamil industry say, there has been many such instances... the infamous case of chimayi sripada is a prime example, even nayanthara was publicly humiliated by a aged useless guy.... the tamil society is like that, they look down on woman who acts in film, but they want women to titillate men in movies. They say that's the reason why less native tamil speaking actresses are very less in movies.
Kajol wasn’t wrong actually😶. India is a democratic country, sort of. You won’t be killed(sometimes)/vanish from the face of this rock, but you will have to change your statement. That’s why, ab se, politics ke baare me pooche koi to bus “Me to vote hi nahi karta, Shamita thodi na hai”.🙏
I don't know why would the remark of Shahid Kapoor cause any outrage. He spoke very politely and I would say was extremely professional by not engaging in public mud slinging.
I read the comment section and many are against Anmol's take on Sonali's comment but I actually take his side... Even if she didn't generalize it, this take is really tone deaf... First of all, she is talking about preference. I am a 100% sure men have preferences too.. It does go both way... So saying women are lazy and that men have to work hard to get into a relationship is just tone deaf... Both parties have to work equally hard in a relationship... So, its not just men who have unfair standards put on them, which I completely acknowledge and sympathise with... Its also women who are expected so much like she should be beautiful, amazing homemaker and the same time should work and earn too... Its unfair to both... Lets acknowledge that...
The problem is with the way this society works, while a girl who do not want to work and earn money can get married to a rich boy, the same won't happen if genders are reversed. While a woman is often free to pursue her career after graduation, a man is expected to start earning and support his family after graduation.
@@davisvincent3247 True that... There certainly do exist many unfair expectations for men like having to work and earn money to support the family, there are many things expected from women as well like women should do household duties and take care of children and family. In most Indian households, women still perform all the household duties while men earn for the family. I know there are going to be comments like 'Women don't do household chores nowadays, they have maids and machines doing all the jobs'. It is mostly true for double income households only where both parties are working. In most single income households, still women are expected to do all the household chores. So, just because men have to face unfair expectations from society doesn't mean women are exempted from it. So my initial point still stands...
@@simplysubhiksha783 Woman doing household chores while the man is going out to earn bread for the family. If my wife is the one who earns & I am at home then it becomes my responsibility to take care of the other aspects which is house & kids. How is that unfair expectation ?
@@lijovarghese4559A lot of the times even when a woman wants to pursue her career, she is EXPECTED to drop it and focus on family. In an average household, it's usually women who are expected to leave their job in order to take care of their family. Many times women aren't even encouraged to pursue higher education as they are EXPECTED to get married and have kids even if the woman wants to study... This is still a fact in many countries.. That is unfair... Get it?
Kajol is absolutely correct. To rule a country you need a intellectual perspective to think and comprehend ahead of current times. Although few are born with this ability (the geniuses and the legends) for most that is developed through education. Period.
Intellectual perspective doesn’t come only from education , it comes from experience. My friend here in Europe is homeschooled and he is the most intelligent person I’ve met. So you see it’s debatable what is taught in school or what one learns from experiences. You’d find a lot of uneducated people who did great for their nations and you’d find examples of highly educated people who only caused destructions.
People fail to understand why the older generation don't have degree... Bcz they were not born in as privileged time as we are.. All the educated politicians like gandhi and nehru were rich .. and could go abroad.. Read about Indian education set up history especially after independence.
Tamil actor Satish is a loose tongue fellow. I've seen him commenting on Sree Leela in an award function (SIIMA if I'm not mistaken) about a Kannada movie named 'KISS'. He asked how many kiss she did and type of kiss she likes. However, she came back strong saying Kiss mean 'Keep it short and simple' indirectly asking him to shut his mouth.
Not a very big fan of Kajol, but what she said can be considered as a fair comment as a lot of our Indian leaders are not educated. Not saying that our actors are highly educated. However they are at least proving their way through their talent which does not require a degree in particular and film industry is a private enterprise and not run by taxpayers money. However, in order to run a country One needs to be educated about the country. Kajol was not naming any particular political party. It’s something like saying- for example -: “our justice system is very slow and weak.“ it would be considered a fair comment as it is talking about the justice system as a whole and not any lawyer or judge or court in particular. A fair comment in legal terms clearly means “A comment or criticism made without malicious intent and based on accurate information or observation.“ ****Edit**** with regards to Sonali Kulkarni, it is also a fair comment however, there is a very fine line between giving a genuine fair argument vs bashing and insulting powerless people. Example- If I say "Most poor people are lazy and are freeloading off the nation's money." That is bound to cause a lot of resentment as I am directly bashing people who are 1) Not at fault for being poor 2) Completely ignoring the fact that poor people are forced into doing thankless, menial jobs to make ends meet. If I say "Inefficient bureaucracy is the reason why proper schemes to uplift the poor are not well implemented, therefore poor people are remaining poor." that can be ignorant or hypocritical, however that is- 1) Putting accountability on bureaucrats who chose to be bureaucrats 2) Based on a certain level of ground level observation and commenting without any harmful intent or simply making a statement with good intent. Hopefully people understood my point. 🙏😊
I think Kajol was 100% right and i didn't expect her to be so frank. The way mainstream politicians conduct themselves, the vile language they use in public, especially during political campaigns is shameful. 90 politicians don't know about the history and geography of their own country, of their own state, they haven't read the constitution, or the law, and this group is in such overwhelming majority in the political circuit, that even the educated ones often bring themselves down to that level to win elections.
Kajol is right in a way about politicians not educated enough. But when a celebrity speaks like this, people tend to (blindly) apply that point to all the politicians irrespective of their educational background and work.
Sonali clearly did not generalize the ENTIRE female population of India. She says MANY women. You can all go "not all women", but her opinion does have substance to it. I know a lot of women like the ones she mentions. She's definitely not wrong. Unfair inclusion in this list sorry Jammy. Also fully agree with you about the fact that there are so many capable and independent women out there. But you don't have to say that like a disclaimer every time you have to talk about something that suggests otherwise.
😅😅😅 MANY is a lie. The whole world & India even bows down to the homemakers for their unrecognised unacknowledged hard labour with NO holidays. And, here's Sonali adding fire to the rising entitlement of men wanting women to do it all AND also provide for family.
You missed Preity zinta's interview in which she was asked about Metoo movement. I really like her but I found her views quite regressive and it feels like she did not know much about it. Still, she is my favourite celebrity.
I remember that moment. Kinda broke my heart because she has had the feeling of being ostracised in the industry but seemed to lack empathy for victims during the same time
@@TriedRefusedProductionsalso Rani Mukherjee saying even 2 month babies should learn self defence. Certified by Akshay Kumar twice women have STILL BEEN 25 out of 25000 women chosen in ADVANCED self defence can ALSO be... You've to understand you freeze at the moment. Or the men are way too heavily built & strong than the women you practiced with. It's NOT physically possible for 99% women. And ,it's time we acknowledged that. Rani said we can't tell mom to tell their sons. Why NOT? WHY can't the moms, dads, everyone tell their sons to know about consent?
@@TriedRefusedProductionsHow do you know they were all victims ? Just because they are woman you blindly believe them. What if tomorrow some Woman says "Anmol Jamwal sexually assaulted me"?. Will your followers still blindly support the Accuser just because she happens to be woman ?
Hi Amol, I recently saw a Koffee with Karan episode 2 from season 1 showcasing Rani and Kareena, where they included a segment in which various then male leading actors like Fardeen, John, Arjun Rampal and many more were openly discussing about the sex appeal and butt of those actresses and rating them on a scale of 1-10 and I could not fathom how normalised it was then. What's even more appalling is that both the actresses were laughing and saying thank you to those guys for being a sport. Give it a watch if you haven't already and maybe make a video on it as to how much of that content is normal for today's scenario as well. Would love to hear your views on it. ❤️
I remember watching it but I feel like most of them are in on it or well versed with what's going to happen. But also, the interviews in the mid 2000s were wild. Both in India and internationally. Its a catch 22 you know: we talk about interviews today being PR trained and boring but the moment someone let's loose, we dissect each and every word they say.
What exactly is wrong with it ? These days many women celebs and others showcase their body including the butts on social media.... it's a common thing now.... You can't say show is ok but u shouldn't talk about it 😂
@@TheUnrulyMonsterit is wrong. Women that wear something revealing whether it is a personal preference or for a role, it does not give permission for people to talk about their bodies especially in public or on television.
@@easyveganfoodie w.r.t role I can agree somewhat... but not if they are flaunting the thing openly... I mean the question anyways isn't about permission... as long as it's legal it's permitted.... but the question is one of decency.... which I think is not violated specially if the women in question are flaunting it left n right.... if a woman is somewhat timid and reserved I'd refrain from making such comments about her....
I absolutely don't agree with Salman Khan on his point of having censor for OTT. The best part about OTT is that you can totally express whatever you feel without any guilt and for people who don't like the abuses and dirty scenes, mat dekho Bhai
@kochikame363 there is already a censor board for the same. But in the past, movies like Masti series and kyaa kool Hain hum series contains double meaning dialogues and objectionable scenes. Tab censor board kyaa kar raha thaa. And as far as TV is concerned, i have stopped watching daily serials from a long time
Says the person who hosts the og show that had people swearing, fighting and living in a toxic environment. If audience goes back and sees reality t.v shows worldwide are the ones who introduced vulgarity.
she does realize that being a house wife (especially if living in a joint family or if they have kids) is actually a very tough job. Far from lazy. The fact that she said that as a woman herself is sad.
What’s wrong with it ? She said many women not all women. It’s a fact. Not just in India all over. Her being a women does not mean she should just put a blind eye towards that kind of stuff
Kajol is absolutely right i think it is high time we need pass a law regarding the education of leaders . Ofcourse it is not about the qualification but education gives you that perspective from all over the world so that you can become mature , ofc it is not a given but i think it will help a lot , and trashing kajol for saying that shows how immature we are
2:55 It's Completely Truth ... If a woman fails to get a job then she can get married to a successful guy but if it happens with a man then it's really hard to stand up in the society
I don't think Sonali kulkari said anything wrong as she didn't generlise she said most of them that is well known truth in our society. you might live in a society where most of the women are self sufficient but the harsh truth is a men can marry a women who is unemployed but how many women would marry a man who is unemployed the difference is sky and earth
No one pressurise men to marry an unemployed woman. They still marry them because they don't want working women. And most of the women support their husband when they lose their job.
Nd many parents discriminate they female child give more importance to male child education so what do you expect women to do then. It's vicious system that has made to weak women dependent on man.
@@preetiraut7700 madam ji what is the responsibility of a women in society. Her in laws are maintained by her husband . Her parent is maintained by her brother (if it's there) . A woman make money to be self dependent and a man make money to to give his family a good living
@@sajalsharma249 ohh please if man work for his family then why man tend call their wives free loders haa ..... First you people call women free loders demean housewives call them they are free loders man constantly say to housewives "Pati ke paiso pe palti hai" nd when Women want to be financially independent then you people even have problem with it? You man shouldn't have called housewives women free loaders,pati ke paiso par palti hai then women wouldn't have called themselves independent women. It says no matter what women do man will always find exucses to demean women. Man hamesha koi na koi bahana dhundh hi lete women ko nicha dikhane ka.
@@screensafari17 a man wants an unemployed woman .but what about a woman wanting a man with 6 digit salary and sarkari naukri . Sad thing is if I say this fact I will be termed as misoginist
Shahid Kapoor already knew what he had signed up for during the making. Anyone can figure it out his character was written way too weak and without much importance , he still shines in some scenes like the one where Ranveer asks him to see Deepika. But overall it was written for Ranveer only he was brilliant but the story revolved just around him with much more screen time and much more impactful scenes. Maybe script was written like both characters will have equal fight but on sets it became completely different and with Ranveer already having worked with SLB was favouring him more .
oh god! It was not about Shahid or Ranveer, It was about Padmavati! The importance of a character cannot be always measured by screen time, just because the character of ranveer has more screen time doesn’t mean SLB is ‘favouring’ him. He did what the story required him to do.
Shahid kapoor plays the supporting actor. Any outsider can do this role. Shahid looks like a 40 kg king. Don't know where his mind while signing supporting actor. I think, he has no brain. He has to take 5 soak almonds in early morning.
Um, you completely missed the point sir. He wasn't talking about the role. He was talaking about what was transpiring during filming. Bhansali getting assaulted, Deepika getting threatened, riots in the country.
No slb the baised chick cutted his ss which they shoot but cut his part thats why he was disappointed and dp Rs pr did their work 🤡 but anyways Kabir Singh did justice to him
The south event wasn't the first of its own. There was an actor, T Rajndar, of some film and he chided Sai Dhansika host+actress on her missing out his name while hosting, and she apologised profusely over it, while the gaudy remarks from the veteran kept on coming, and the two cast-mates kept on laughing. It was atrocious. The veteran is the father of now bigger star, Silambarasan TR, and only Actor Vishal came out in her support. It's just too much drama happening over there outside the movie.
Selmon bhoi feeling sad, that actors with actual talent can become stars while working for OTT platforms, while the MAFIA of big theater and studios are FORCED to acknowledge the change. No More Eid ke 100 Crore every year.
yes as salman khan said @ 4:57 onwards the OTT space is sadly becoming a place for watching uncensored content there has be some sort of censorship rules in place in this matter i agree with him ......👍
Sonali Kulkarni took what seems to be a personal issue and decided to vent it out publicly. I have come across several Maharashtrian women who think a woman's worth lies in how endlessly and tirelessly they can work, how much they can sacrifice, how less comfort they need. God forbid if one decides to rest. Yes, there are women out there who are lazy , of course there are. But how many get the privilege of being that once married? How many indian men out there saying rest up ,I will do EVERYTHING.
For 6:30 Do you know what is authentic Indian dress. No. Coz after mughal invasion the culture changed entirely and now the modern babas brainwashed entire generation into believing that Authentic Indian dress is "Western culture ' and the Mughal dress is"Indian Culture " . Irony is that these same babas shout that India is rich 5000 year old culture. But for women they don't consider Vedic culture as indian culture. Just search the dresses and status of women in Vedic era. Whatever you hv been told since childhood is Western, u would realise that it's actually Indian Culture. Be it dress as just a fabric of comfort, sex not a taboo, position of women in society, Often heard that LWs distorted history, but the fact is LW and RW both distort history as per their convenience. See the difference is ideas of Vedic culture and Abrahmic culture. With all due respect in Abrahmic religion length of clothes is equal to modesty. Contrary in Vedic culture for any auspicious rituals like yagna visiting temples stiched clothes are prohibited. That's why pandits perform arti wearing lungi and it is same for women. That's why u will find many such sculptures and paintings of bare chest women inside temples. If skin show was sin, if showing affection was sin, would our ancestors have allowed it in the holy premises of temples. People now know about Vedic culture only through distorted version of Ramanand Sagar and modern Babas. They don't know sanskrit, didn't study Vedic culture, didn't study vedas but believe babas.
In my personal opinion, it seems that you may have misunderstood Sonali Kulkarni's point.😅 I believe she was trying to convey that men are often not even considered as potential partners unless they meet certain criteria. As a result, men have to invest a significant amount of time and effort to reach a certain standard. Many women desire partners who are in their prime, which is why Sonali made the remark about "women of this generation being lazy." This comment was not without reason, as men strive to transform and develop themselves to meet the general preferences of women. On the other hand, women sometimes perceive men's preferences as unreasonable and regard themselves as the ultimate prize right from the start. It's important to note that these are just my personal thoughts on the matter...
Fair enough and everyone like Sonali is also providing their perspective on the topic and I think that's why it becomes important to acknowledge THERE IS NO right or wrong in 'many indian women being lazy' but people can express whether they agree or disagree based on their life experiences.
@@TriedRefusedProductionsher statement was many women in this country and not every women in this country, so I think people who got offended by this were just trying to make something out of nothing.
You say these are your personal thoughts on the matter, so obviously that is your interpretation of what Sonali said. India is not yet so developed that "many women" even have the practical privilege of choosing their husbands as a fundamental right. The amount of women that reject men because of lack of money is far outweighed by the sheer amount of women who work hard through their early twenties just to fill the pockets of their future husbands in the name of marital "gifts". Even among educated families, the list of "gifts" from the bride is far longer and far more valuable than that of the groom. I come from a middle class background and I started earning right in my final year of college. But will this money go to my future savings? No. In this economy middle-class fathers are simply not capable enough to prepare their daughters' dowries on their own. My entire savings will go in paying loans after my marriage, and I'll have to work even then to support my husband, along with kitchen responsibilities. It all depends on the people you surround yourself with. You surround yourself with the privileged 1% in this country and bury your head in the sand then ofcourse you're going to have an opinion that is different from actual reality.
I dont think Sonali Kulkarnis words were generalizing the entire female population of this country. She clearly mentioned that she was talking about a mindset within some younger women. In my opinion she didnt deserve the backlash she got.
@@TriedRefusedProductions It is 100% correct. I bet any women to marry a men earning less than her....She won't...Jyoti Maurya case is not an isolate event.....And no, 0.5% of higher echelons doesn't constitute India....
@@TriedRefusedProductionsthat's your perception. And it's not true, Most women are hypergameous in nature and they always depends upon more financially and physically dominant men to have a family. That's the naturality. Very few exceptions can't be taken into consideration and vice-versa can't generalise either. But you can't change the inner desire and blame on patriarchy and other reasons
@@harshraj6116 my Bhabhi married to a man who was unemployed , my mother married to a man who was poor even lived in poverty with him. My masi also married to man who is lazy alcoholic she have work in order fullfill her nd children's requirements.
@@harshraj6116 even where I live many man are just last , alcoholic, nd their wives work earn money nd those unemployed man do eve teasing many so should I start Generalizing that all man are bad. If women is your house is lazy , unemployed nd gold digger that doesn't mean all women are same. Please take care of Women of your house who are bad okay mr.
I agree with Sonali's point though, me being a girl have seen some of my friends just wanting a rich husband. If she said "kuch" instead of "bhot sari" it would have been a very valid point. Also, it tells you, if you are in public eye, how carefully you have to pick your words.
What I found funny is you could downright insult these star kids and they'll be like. "yeah, exactly..." Without realising what's really being said. 😂😂 Like in the case of siddhant chaturvedi case😅
what Sonali Kulkarni said is not wrong. you cannot say that her opinion was tone-deaf. there are still many women in the subcontinent region that do think of living on their husband's income. and I am not trying to demean them. the reason for this is happening is because of the Lackings in education, family members pressure, sociological habits and unwise way of thinking. and yes, it is indeed a very unfortunate thing that is still going on, but we cannot just ignore it. it will surely change one day only if we are honest enough to accept it and try to eradicate this type of thinking from all the peoples head.
I dont think Salman and Sonali are wrong .. Sonali was right most women want rich guy instead of working hard and getting rich and Salman was right vulgarity is bad .. you can close eyes and think everything what you experience or like is good but thats not the case everything has its impact and vulgar films have bad impacts, and not criticising women for being lazy will not encourage them. (Edited part : If someone calls me lazy i will be working really hard, it would encourage me but nowadays ppl get offended on very small things)
I dont intend to say one is right or wrong because these are opinions and all a result of the life and experiences they've had. So while I don't agree with Sonali and Salman because their takes are way more nuanced than having a black or white opinion, that's why they make it to the video of 'controversial takes'
And what is vulgar? Dancing in half naked outfits, romanticizing with a man of father's age, Cracking double meaning jokes? Why not censor "Character Dheela" type songs, they also have bad impact. Just as with mass entertainers, makers say "nobody is forcing you to watch it", why doesnot same hold true for other type of content? If noone watches it, it wont be made.
@@TriedRefusedProductions yes you are right then it means you misrepresented them because they didn't said their opinion are best and not false sonali didn't said all indian women are like that.. Salman also did vulgar songs etc, but vulgarity on these tv series he was talking about is too much, you can't watch these tv series which he was talking about with your family or even with your siblings.. i mean in many movies se* scene are hidden you dont have to see a women or men nude completely.. i think Gangs of wasepur is good example it is perfectly captured bad side of society and s*x scenes without showing nudes or too much maa behn ki gaali .. nowadays its seems from tv series that no one in india completes a sentence without a gaali & every episode must have nude or se* scenes
2:51 she stated facts dude. Women day in and day out blames men for whatever happens to them, then finds a rick brad to live a hassle free life. Don't be a dog to get sympathy from women
If Kajol had the educational system background she would know the difference between democracy and a technocracy. And by her own logic I have more authority on it as I have a PhD from UT Austin and she does not. Representative democracy is about carrying the will of people. If people want to vote based on education and not interest it's up to them.
Sonali Kulkarni is 100% correct, mumbai and delhi people should get out of their A.C. homes and see reality, reality is not politically correct. I completely support Sonali ji.
@@KP-2105 it seems you never went out from your AC room where I live majority of man are lazy, alcoholic , unemployed, nd their wives works do Household as well job. Not to mention those man also do Eve teasing etc..
No Kajol was completely wrong in all her assesment.. Yes Education is necessary but that don't mean it's reason India changes slowly.. India changes slowly and is quite poor because of Socialism and most educated class in India are themselves Socialist/Leftist so education is beyond point here.. Rahul and Rajiv Gandhia are bith western educated, what's their achievements? Null& void. Education isn't prove of worthiness and intelligence, you can hire hundred of intellectual who will at your payroll but only if you have will power to do it.. Remember Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel? Go check his education profile..
WTH wrong with Robo Shankar. Such misogynistic and objectifying remarks towards Hansika and no one says anything. Looks like Hansika was against performing a scene in the movie but he insisted on touching her. Good that he’s been called out for such sleazy remarks on public forums.
Sonali Kulkarni saying women are lazy is the same as Kim Kardashian saying "get off your ass and work" 😭 such tone deaf statements and what's absolutely wild is Sonali Kulkarni is an amazing actor but has absolutely no idea about her own privilege.
Did anyone ever follow up with the cast about their indifference to Robo Shankar's comments? How awful for the actress to find out afterwards what had been said.
I disagree with your point on sonali's statement what she said is a fact and I agree with her, she said "BAHOT SAARI LADKIYAAN not " HAR LADKIYAAN " So your point is wrong and girls(as sonali mentioned) exist.
To Sonali's point that will be actively discussed in the comment section, I just wanted to say:-
The point is not about ALL WOMEN, MOST WOMEN or SOME WOMEN but a generalised take that gets said on a public platform which is subjective and cannot be analytically proven. Its just a standard you set dependent on your experiences, it does not mean its universally true!
Fuck yes!! Thank you....for addressing this. She has her right to her opinion...but to make generalised statements in public about an entire gender is a little irresponsible especially in a country that's patriarchal in nature!!!
Okay, according to your argument, Kajol is also wrong. Why does dhe generalize all politicians when there are still many politicians who are well-educated? But no, Kajol is right, and Sonali is wrong!
Brother I agree with most of the opinion you put out but it will be a surprise to you how many girls are there who exactly are what sonali said and metropolis population is not majority so most of the female population in suburban or rural areas are incompetent and work only to get husbands just get a report in the Hindu that was published search it
To be honest, I do see her perspective too. Because we still believe a suitable groom is one who earns more than the bride to be. When looking for prospective guys on martrimony websites, I have noticed a lot of women in my own circle looking for guys who are financially stable and are earning more than they do. My thinking is different and fortunately my family and in laws are both of the 'it's a partnership either way' thinking. But nonetheless, I was shocked to hear these opinions almost everywhere around me. While there's nothing wrong with marrying a guy who earns more/less than you, making it a base criteria while searching for a groom is sadly a common practice.
@@lavanyakrishnakumar8984 patriachy my ass!!!!
no one can beat sonam when it comes to embarrassing themselves publicly
The Queen of Cringe
True 😂
ananya gives good competition tho
Kangana Ranaut in the chat 😏
Alia too! Quite often being rude and insensible when answering questions by media
What Kajol said is correct though. Some ppl ruling the country don't have the education/qualifications for ruling the country. Ppl calling Kajol uneducated, she might be a school-dropout, but she's not ruling and making decisions for the country. Acting is her profession and she's amazing at that! The ppl who troll her for expressing her opinions later troll her for apologizing after. C'mon, the media made such a big deal out of it, she had to apologize to keep the media circling around her statement🙄
Education se jyada experience and administrative capabilities matter karti hai . Also ppl ruling the country are very educated just check there education properly .check the education of all ministers once .
Waise dekha jjaye to laden bhi padha likha tha usko bana de kya fir pm 😂😂
People talk about "qualifications to rule" but what are these qualifications? Saying XYZ degree is very arbitrary. If the point is "education is important cos it gives you perspective" then that perspective matters in every field - including acting. And the fact that Kajol didn't feel the need to find that perspective in own career only makes her seem like a hypocrite.
Her husband is selling Pan masala and this school dropout comes out to preach about education. Isn’t it because of ppl like her husband, this country is getting exploited? You know how much tax pan masala companies pay to government. Her husband is promoting it, this doesn’t need education, its common sense. Still they are doing it being aware of its lethal affects, they are pretty much like the politicians, everyone is exploiting like her husband. More than education ppl need common sense which she clearly lacks. 😒
@@AkashVaniChannelbana do. I am supporting you
Kajol was making a valid point though about why education is important in politics and when she apologized for her statement she ironically proved her point😅
Its crazy on how the outrage can immediately make you want to back track what you organically felt like saying
@@TriedRefusedProductions Yes sad but true
@@TriedRefusedProductionskajol otself is 10th pass
@@nischesharma 😂😂
educated and loot country??? does not matter inclusiveness and honesty , hard work important for a leader nothing else
The Hansika Motwane bit was unbelievable. Actresses have to work in such unsafe environment
Jadoo's gonna take revenge don't worry.
@@tiromandal6399😂
@@eashmishra2960 I can already imagine his hands glowing, both of them.....means something big is coming.
The irony of Kajol having to apologize for pointing out the cons of lack of education among politicians...
Who is a 10th fail herself
@@vinnienandais Kajol running the country? No. Then she doesn't need education
@@vinnienandadid kajol ever said she has a ms in politics
@@vinnienanda how is her not clearing 10th grade relevant to what she said? She's not holding public office nor making policies, nor running the country. Also, standardized school learning is not the only form of education, nor are marks everything. I know plenty of people that scored As in their theory exams but know jack-shit about real life and struggle in the real world.
In the world of fools the voice of reason is always silenced
I want to comment on Arjun Kapoor's statement of trolling him is also indirectly trolling the historical figure he portrayed in the movie Panipat. Dear Arjun, Sadashiv Rao Bhau was insulted when you were casted for portraying his role.
++
😂 lol
I like Arjun Kapoor
@@jimmyreviews1486see, liking someone is fine. Even I like him. But he's not a good actor. That's what they are talking about.
With arjun his performances are not consistent to the point of one can move from constructive criticism to trolling. Theres nothing that'll help him realize his flaws and seems like he knows people are just insulting him now. His lack of good performance is a result of his own mistakes.
Rajeev Masand calling Siddhant Chaturvedi 'unfair' is unfair.
A lot of people said that Kajol herself is just 10th pass and therefore she is no one to make that statement.
But she's not the one running the country or responsible for the economy. Every citizen of this country educated or not deserves to have well educated leaders governing the country.
I mean many leaders are not even 10th pass
If u don't want uneducated leaders then don't vote them
But it is not correct thing to take away right of people to get elected as adminstator but leaders must be atleast 12 pass
you dont need to be educated to be a leader. you need to have leadership qualities to be a leader. its not just he pm or president that runs the government. theres a cabinet of ministers appointed by him and each has a huge team under them. and the chain continues. learn the basics of how a government works before talking lol.
@@bruhmantri2074i think he knows the basics . Yes you need leadership qualities to be a leader. Right agreed but at the same time education does give you a wider perspective, morals , more philosophy you can look into and choose or make your own philosophy and not merely your upbringing give you a one sided idea of the world. Ofcourse it is not a given but it does surely help . Of all the people now praising Jai Shankar as the best foreign minister, why do you think that is - because he is qualified for the job not just reading out what his staff give him . Atleast a political science and philosophy degree would do good for being a leader that has control over many people
@@abhinavmaharaj4804 if you think being educated and having a degree is that important ? Having basic education is enough. You don't need to be some IITian to be the PM. politics works on policies. Policies are made from experiences. Experience is gained from being on the ground.
It is absolutely unfair to judge other women based on what we perceive with our (often) privileged notions. I see it all the time in maddening white upper-class feminist discourse. Not all women are able to fight for the same things, sometimes there's just way too many other things including societal conditioning, circumstances, etc. that make their situation the way it is. You may not understand someone's situation, but you ought to at least give them the benefit of the doubt. Also, most women are not simply sitting while their husbands are working. Domestic labor is also incredibly important labor which unfortunately gets overlooked often. Even assuming something about the experiences of an entire group of people based on one anecdotal experience shows internal prejudices that already existed.
But she clearly said that *some* women are lazy and it's true...there are lazy People and women happen to be some of them.. not all "failed" people are a result of society and circumstances. Some are just pure their own doing.
True. She thinks managing the household work is being "lazy" lol. Kudos to those women who are working and also managing house, but the homemakers also should be credited. I won't let anyone say that my mom doesn't do any work at home. Man she does more than anybody else in the house
Being lazy is not a gender thing I think? Are some men not lazy? Not calling househusbands lazy though, it's their own choice which I respect. So that's the point, lazy hona ya na hona is a Choice much?
@@rubikscube39 The context in which she was saying that was wrong.
to be fair Sonali did not say “Some Homemaker” she only said Some Women… how everyone here has decided that she was talking about women who take care of the house…
And Jammy you know what is to e deaf ??? The media, the judiciary and the people in power turning a blind eye to the misuse of gender biased law in our country.
My skin crawled when I heard the disgusting comments made by Robo towards Hamsika. Absolutely lewd and lecherous. What was worse, like jammy pants rightly pointed out, nobody had the balls to stop him. This shows the lack of consequences. Why isn’t he being questioned about his vile behavior. I am sure Hamsika is keeping quiet because if she opens her mouth she will lose project. Utterly disdainful and shameful!
The audacity he had to just admit it on stage he really thought there was nothing wrong with it
@@anjalik1136 monsters! They do all this with impunity
Kajol was literally making a valid point and what's more depressing that people are saying that she herself is 10th pass. Maybe that's why Kajol said education is important.
May be try reading history of indian educational institutions after 1947..
You will get why the older generation doesn't hold a lot of degrees like us..
Why only rich could afford degree..at that time..
You will understand why politicians don't have degree.
@@kritikarathi808 Then perhaps those older people who have degrees should be the ones who should be eligible for making the decisions of our country. People are talking about educated people filling up the posts in power so at the very least they would have the minimum knowledge about certain topics and do not embarrass the entire country outside by their ignorance and pass crass statements that makes one fill bewildered about what kind of people are in position of power. This is country's government where no leniency should be shown to uneducated people and should be given seats to them out of pity
@@kritikarathi808you think pm Modi was poor huh??research needed lmao
@@spdadventurer1754 really man.. 11 month old comment..😂👍
U have a very weird capacity for doing research.
Have fun!
I am busy doing more productive things so excuse my notification bar.
What Kajol said was correct. Even our freedom fighters were highly educated
Like that made a difference,and education qualifications by themselves dont mean much in the end.
I mean even thermometers have degrees,but you know where we stick them......
@@mihirshetye4624well said my friend
@@mihirshetye4624 That made a difference because their choices were guided by their experiences, also L analogy you made there with the thermometer
@@mimitabiswas4534 What difference did it make in the end ?
I mean if you still believe that India got its freedom due to Gandhi and Co,you live in Lala Land.
@@mihirshetye4624 Read history first and then come talk about that, maybe try Bipin Chandra.
Yes, Salman doesn't believe in abusive words on screen, because he believes in carrying out those on ground!
ok jhaksushi, you got 44 likes now go and wash dishes.
@@Skydrow27 good try, but not enough. Put your best efforts next time.
@@BeinglogicalX The fact that it made you change your name says alot about how enough that reply was.
@@Skydrow27 try again
@@Skydrow27I'm sure she washes her own dishes. Doing good work there. What about you though? Does your mom still wash your dishes and dirty underwear while you scratch your belly and eat like a pig and order everyone around to work for you?
Sonali’s privilege showed in her statement because even in many urban well-off families women don’t have the agency to make any decisions about their own lives. From not being allowed to work at all, to working in specific fields so that you can also carry out all your household chores for the whole family after work; this is the reality in our country. The situation is worse in tier 2-3 cities. Sonali’s comments on just one set of women is disrespectful to all the other women trying to make it in a man’s world.
Very well said
@@aravindr740 see the thing is in 2023 I guess no mortal man (in this case a women as well) is allowed to make any comments upon the incompetance of women. let's be honest women are not ready or strong enough to accept their flaws or any criticism, they just don't hold the power for that, hence if any valid arguments are made they literally attack upon it instead of thinking it overall whether is it valid and useful or not. like lets address the elephant in the room, women disagree and disobey their parents, husband, brother every now and then.it's like a fashion. they literally don't even want to sit down and give it thought about what are they saying and are they correct or not. Since none of them want to listen anyone, none of them want to improve, why waste timing in explaining them. again when we'll try to do it they'll be like,"you are mansplaining us". anyways this is my personal opinion. I'd suggest keep your mouth shut, they are not worth saving or literally having a teeny tiny logical conversation. they are already doomed.
She mentioned some women and not all women, we can't deny the fact that it's partly true, there are many women who are well educated and do nothing, and also there are some women in tier 1 cities as well who don't do anything with per text of searching of their pathpath and eventually get married to some rich guy.
i dont know about privilege but i didnt see one single girl in my entire life who married a guy who gets a lower salary than herself. Your comment might be idealistic but it doesnt reflect reality sonalis does
@@indipacifician3693 That is because society is conditioned like that. My friend's boyfriend's family refused her as their would-be bahu because she earns more than him. they can't see their bahu earning more than their son, which is the case almost everywhere. but I hope this narrative changes soon. ruining both the genders
I feel what Kajol said was 100% true and there was no need for apology
🤷♂🤷♂ The Twitter backlash may have got to her team
@@TriedRefusedProductionsshe itself 10th pass
@@nischesharmaItself 😎😎
@@finepilot didn't want to assume pronouns
@@finepilotGrammar Nazi
the funniest part about the reaction to Kajol's statement was, that anyone who reacted was basically admitting that their favoured leaders are uneducated and unqualified
Plz read about Indian educational institutions history after 1947..
And check politicians age.
You will get all your answers.
True. Towering figure of Shri. Rahul Gandhi ji came to my mind when she referred to uneducated politicians.
@@shiro3888mine was modi gang as well
Best comment
Only rich women in India can afford to be lazy. Maybe Sonali K thinks this way becoz she is upper class herself and the women around her
would be too. But she is forgetting that being lazy is not a luxury the rest of Indian women have. Working women usually have to handle office and home both, and anyone calling a housewife lazy has never met one. And yes many women do seek rich successful husbands, but let's not forget how many women in this country are simply not allowed to study, work or be independent. The situation is such that their husband is the only source of their social and financial capital. But yes there are women who are gold diggers in the true sense of the word, but they are undoubtedly a very small minority. A very rich woman married to a very rich man is telling the rest of Indian women to not be lazy. This moment reminded me of Kim K when she said that just get off your ass and work. The privilege dripping off of these statements is astounding.
Also her statement implies that housewives are lazy which is wrong
Wrong.!! Normal women want to find rich husbands so they can be lazy and not work. That’s what’s she meant. She isn’t pointing fingers at housewives who’s are also working women. How many single girls try to find single rich guys who are loaded ? Just so they can have the luxury n be lazy..
I have noticed this thing about the southern film industry that people are very openly misogynistic and creepy towards actresses. N it is seen as something very normal. Mumbai film industry people are more evolved towards women in comparison. About the whole Ananya Pandey statement thing, I completely disagree with her but I do feel that her trolling became too toxic n nasty after a certain point which can mess the mind of a 20 yr old. That is the whole problem with social media, that discourse can transform into nasty trolling and lose all substance.
but yk South industry is the best
Female actors get trolled way more than male actors on social media.
Please educate everyone on this industry you speak of. Firstly Robo Shankar is a nobody and the second guy's joke was lost in translation - he was referring to Leone dressing like a South Indian and the other actress being from the South not doing so. It's a joke.
Take a hard look at the mysogyny Sunny Leone gets her way during Hindi film promotions. The South is incomparably more accepting of her past than the cheap, vulgar shit she gets asked in the North.
nah, if you are not mentally ready for social media discourse and the downfalls of the same, then dont be on the forefront of a public platform that you cant face, and dont say stupid entitled things.. the consequences of which you are not mentally resilient enough to handle yourself. Ananya Pandey is not that young or naive to not know where she stands, where she's coming from and what comes out of her mouth. These people are well-educated, well-travelled, and well-privileged. They cannot fool anyone into thinking that they are innocent or "just 20 years old". Their "innocence" is actually wilful ignorance. She is the fool, she is not fooling anybody.
@@TriedRefusedProductions STR father made an actress cry just because she couldn't satisfy his ego that he is still in his prime and he deserve the spotlight and bashed her infront of media .I completely agree with you jammy bro
Sonali made a very ignorant statement. Most Indian women are homemakers while others are working. The rich can only afford to be lazy. She put the entire blame on women as if men aren't dumping all the responsibilities of house, kids and in laws on their wives 😂
Not to mention Sonali, Kulkarni herself has a rich husband, who is the CEO of ALT Balaji. Don’t believe me just google her.
Ppl are misunderstanding her statement.. She also wasn't specific with her comment. She mainly meant those lazy nautanki girls like Sonam Kapoor who are entitled that they want a ready made man of wealth while they live off of his riches while she becomes a child bearing machine. It's 2023 and it still baffles me how women can have this much trust on men financially etc
Your husband can still leave u, cheat, become Dissintersted in u etc what will u do? He got his own bag while u got nothing.. Having financial independency is important for everyone no matter gender. It's just more men usually have it than women since women still buys the idea of getting from her man when it's just setting them in risks.
Whoever has money has the power. Gender roles in society is the true oppression here. Ppl are belittled bcuz of the gender stereotypes
@@vinnienandathat's not the point bcuz she's not a stay at home housewife living off of her husbands money n spending it. She is something herself. She's talking about those who don't have aspirations n goals in life yet demands rich men. It's the entitlement that she's tryna point out
@@emyf9197Like Sonam? Like or hate her, she makes a ton of money from her style.
@@emyf9197stay at home women don't just spend. In a society degraded to this extent where NON-financial contribution is not even SEEN or RECOGNIZED, this just adds to it.
A stay at homemaker has no day off AT ALL.
Not even Sundays!
I don’t know why Shahid regret’s working on Padmaavat, but I thoroughly loved watching him as Maharaja Ratwal Singh King of Mewar. He was so convincing in his performance.
He regretted because of the crisis.
Bhansali getting assaulted, Deepika having a bounty on her head, riots unleashing across the country.
He was scared.
I think it was because of the huge controversy that happened with the director who was beaten and protest happned this cud have probably killed his will to play that character
I know. I believe, he was the most convincing in the film
Same here.. really liked him❤
Because movie was about Deepika and shahid and not ranveer. Many scenes of shahid was cut off to increase scenes time of other two actors.. So he felt bad
@7:00 I actually agree with her!!! How many of our leaders actually have a scientific temperament in their approach?!!! Trolling her for this statement is such a shame especially in a so called democratic country.
The result of trolling literally can be on the most basic, widely known facts. Its insane where we are today
Scientific temperament has no definition prescribed by the constitution.
The so called democracy allows for people from all walks of life the opportunity to aspire for democratic positions.
If you didn't want that then you are anti so called democracy. It's good that a sense of apathy towards democracy and universal adult franchise is developing. Authoritarianism will do well for a country like ours.
2 of India's most skilled PM- Nehru and Manmohan 🤣🤣🤣🤦🏼🤦🏼🤦🏼 If education equates high political competency then there wouldn't have ever a Kashmir issue in first place....Lol that PM invited UN to solve India's internal issue 🤣🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
@@harshraj6116India's "internal issue" involved a region that did not want to be part of India. That's like calling British colonization an "internal issue" of the British.
@@harshraj6116now we have regular danga everywhere
Kajol didn't mention any specific leader tho...people assumed it was about our revered prime minister and caused outrage probably
I would also want to mention the Amisha Patel interview where she spoke about the ott platform and mentioned how parents have to close their eyes when it comes to portraying the LGBTQ community and other things but ironically didn’t have an issue with her portrayal in the Yash raj movie where she dances to lazy Lamhe. That movie was a kids movie and there were kids in that songs 😂
it's only a problem for her to see gay people existing on screen. Her shoving her boobs in children's faces is fine(I'm not being misogynistic, simply pointing out her hypocrisy) gay people merely existing is sexual for these people, but nothing straight people do can ever be seen as bad lmao, regardless of how sexual it is.
She still made a valid point. Children in America are taking gender change surgery procedures. Because they feel they are something else. Madness is growing fast. One cant leave female/male child with other female/male friends anymore. Never know when they turn lesbians/gays.
Amisha is RIGHT about LGBTQ(xyz) perverse. 💯
I believe it's somewhat hypocritical of Amir to claim that the roast format does not send a positive message. I vividly recall during the promotion of Delhi Belly, when asked about the film's vulgarity and provocative dialogue, he himself stated that the movie was intended for the youth and that this generation naturally communicates in such a manner. Therefore, he deemed it completely acceptable to showcase these elements. However, when AIB performed their roast, he suddenly changed his stance.
Delhi belly promoted as 18+ film ,when it's tv premier happened , all the vulgar dialogues removed , secondly , they were characters in the movie whereas in AIB shows real celebrities and influencers are doing such type of things like mai leta hu ..tu choddta hai on public platform which neither was 18+
So there is difference.
@@moviecric700 so what do you think Aib roast was promoted as a pg 13 video?
Don't forget the iconic speech from 3 idiots
Disgusting
@@aniruddhamungekar8663 lmao 😂
@@moviecric700 So you mean, to be able to abuse you have to play a certain characters?
It was uncomfortable to watch that statement by Janhvi as having the access and privilege to follow up with producers. Contrast it with interviews of talented actors like Avinash Tiwary where he mentioned having to audition for smaller roles like bulbbul and girl on the train, even after his stellar performance as the lead in Laila Majnu! It just leaves a bad taste when Nepo kids are tone deaf and unaware of pandering their privilege as struggles!
kajol was simply speaking facts 🤚🏼
2:16 that creep exactly knew that the actress don't know that language and will act with a smile on whatever is being said. It's disturbing that no one Stop that creep in the middle of that outrageous act. Maybe because southern movie industry is habitual of such misogynist behaviour.
The comment by Rajeev would make any 'outsider' uncomfortable who is trying to make his way in the industry it gave me the same vibe of Sonam and Rajkummar Rao interview.
Kajol statement is totally a 'grey area' comment. Ofcourse, many going to assume she is talking about current government, but it's the problem of all the parties - be it BJP, Congress, or AAP. And while she has right to speak her mind or criticise the government, other people also have the rights to criticize her statement. Given she has a face that millions recognize, a statement like that will indeed attract some hate towards her, and she has to deal with that, that's what a major problem of being famous.
And if anyone supports what these IT cell trolls and apologists of political parties do, they re bastards.
They were not merely criticizing her statement but calling to cancel her.
kajol talked sense....why would people take offence
You can't challenge the ruling class.
After 1947 education system was very doomed..
Not everyone had the privilege of going abroad and studying.
Plz check the age bracket and the economy's education set up of time.
Not having degree doesn't means you have no knowledge..
And can't join politics...
Is it?
Haters gone hate! No issues. Just giving logical explanation of why our previous generation don't have degrees like us.
2 min Silence for those people who still thinks that Twitter fights and controversies are genuine and not pre planned😂
Old time it looks genuine but now it's way obvious
Eg Arjun Kapoor rant about napotism😂
It did him no favours tho for taking up that mantle against the abuse the industry was getting. It should have been a unified move. They eventually did stand up as a collective tho for the BS mainstream media was saying
@@TriedRefusedProductionsit did him the favour. He got him his 15 minute of fame.
India have one of the lowest participation of women in labour and yes many of Indian women don't wanna work and earn on their own. It's a thing that I have seen in my home , neighbour and many relatives homes
In india it's mostly TRUE that women don't wanna work
Feel for Shahid tbf. Film didn't have much for either of the two other leads, except Ranveer. Post release, Ranveer and Deepika's PR did the rest.
I heard Vicky was the first choice for Shahid's role.
He would've killed it!
I still wish to hear from Deepika too.
I cannot imagine what she went through.
@@thv353 shahid did great job too
@@thv353Shahid was great in his role in the movie.
@@thv353 lmao
Iam not surprised by what men in tamil industry say, there has been many such instances... the infamous case of chimayi sripada is a prime example, even nayanthara was publicly humiliated by a aged useless guy.... the tamil society is like that, they look down on woman who acts in film, but they want women to titillate men in movies. They say that's the reason why less native tamil speaking actresses are very less in movies.
Kajol wasn’t wrong actually😶.
India is a democratic country, sort of.
You won’t be killed(sometimes)/vanish from the face of this rock, but you will have to change your statement.
That’s why, ab se, politics ke baare me pooche koi to bus “Me to vote hi nahi karta, Shamita thodi na hai”.🙏
First India is democratic country their is no sort and second people voted for uneducated person over all other educated people
A democratic country doesn't appease certain minority.
3:08 she is actually correct…not all women…but most of the family teaches thr daughters to be a gold diggers
I don't know why would the remark of Shahid Kapoor cause any outrage. He spoke very politely and I would say was extremely professional by not engaging in public mud slinging.
I read the comment section and many are against Anmol's take on Sonali's comment but I actually take his side... Even if she didn't generalize it, this take is really tone deaf... First of all, she is talking about preference. I am a 100% sure men have preferences too.. It does go both way... So saying women are lazy and that men have to work hard to get into a relationship is just tone deaf... Both parties have to work equally hard in a relationship... So, its not just men who have unfair standards put on them, which I completely acknowledge and sympathise with... Its also women who are expected so much like she should be beautiful, amazing homemaker and the same time should work and earn too... Its unfair to both... Lets acknowledge that...
The problem is with the way this society works, while a girl who do not want to work and earn money can get married to a rich boy, the same won't happen if genders are reversed. While a woman is often free to pursue her career after graduation, a man is expected to start earning and support his family after graduation.
@@davisvincent3247 True that... There certainly do exist many unfair expectations for men like having to work and earn money to support the family, there are many things expected from women as well like women should do household duties and take care of children and family. In most Indian households, women still perform all the household duties while men earn for the family. I know there are going to be comments like 'Women don't do household chores nowadays, they have maids and machines doing all the jobs'. It is mostly true for double income households only where both parties are working. In most single income households, still women are expected to do all the household chores. So, just because men have to face unfair expectations from society doesn't mean women are exempted from it. So my initial point still stands...
@@simplysubhiksha783 Woman doing household chores while the man is going out to earn bread for the family. If my wife is the one who earns & I am at home then it becomes my responsibility to take care of the other aspects which is house & kids. How is that unfair expectation ?
@@lijovarghese4559A lot of the times even when a woman wants to pursue her career, she is EXPECTED to drop it and focus on family. In an average household, it's usually women who are expected to leave their job in order to take care of their family. Many times women aren't even encouraged to pursue higher education as they are EXPECTED to get married and have kids even if the woman wants to study... This is still a fact in many countries.. That is unfair... Get it?
@@simplysubhiksha783not unfair , just a biological reality. men can't birth kids.
Kajol is absolutely correct. To rule a country you need a intellectual perspective to think and comprehend ahead of current times. Although few are born with this ability (the geniuses and the legends) for most that is developed through education. Period.
Intellectual perspective doesn’t come only from education , it comes from experience. My friend here in Europe is homeschooled and he is the most intelligent person I’ve met. So you see it’s debatable what is taught in school or what one learns from experiences. You’d find a lot of uneducated people who did great for their nations and you’d find examples of highly educated people who only caused destructions.
People fail to understand why the older generation don't have degree...
Bcz they were not born in as privileged time as we are..
All the educated politicians like gandhi and nehru were rich .. and could go abroad..
Read about Indian education set up history especially after independence.
Tamil actor Satish is a loose tongue fellow. I've seen him commenting on Sree Leela in an award function (SIIMA if I'm not mistaken) about a Kannada movie named 'KISS'. He asked how many kiss she did and type of kiss she likes. However, she came back strong saying Kiss mean 'Keep it short and simple' indirectly asking him to shut his mouth.
tf
Kajol is one hundred percent correct.wish she hadn't given her explanation though.
Not a very big fan of Kajol, but what she said can be considered as a fair comment as a lot of our Indian leaders are not educated. Not saying that our actors are highly educated. However they are at least proving their way through their talent which does not require a degree in particular and film industry is a private enterprise and not run by taxpayers money. However, in order to run a country One needs to be educated about the country. Kajol was not naming any particular political party. It’s something like saying- for example -: “our justice system is very slow and weak.“ it would be considered a fair comment as it is talking about the justice system as a whole and not any lawyer or judge or court in particular. A fair comment in legal terms clearly means “A comment or criticism made without malicious intent and based on accurate information or observation.“
****Edit**** with regards to Sonali Kulkarni, it is also a fair comment however, there is a very fine line between giving a genuine fair argument vs bashing and insulting powerless people. Example- If I say "Most poor people are lazy and are freeloading off the nation's money." That is bound to cause a lot of resentment as I am directly bashing people who are
1) Not at fault for being poor
2) Completely ignoring the fact that poor people are forced into doing thankless, menial jobs to make ends meet.
If I say "Inefficient bureaucracy is the reason why proper schemes to uplift the poor are not well implemented, therefore poor people are remaining poor." that can be ignorant or hypocritical, however that is-
1) Putting accountability on bureaucrats who chose to be bureaucrats
2) Based on a certain level of ground level observation and commenting without any harmful intent or simply making a statement with good intent.
Hopefully people understood my point. 🙏😊
I think Kajol was 100% right and i didn't expect her to be so frank. The way mainstream politicians conduct themselves, the vile language they use in public, especially during political campaigns is shameful. 90 politicians don't know about the history and geography of their own country, of their own state, they haven't read the constitution, or the law, and this group is in such overwhelming majority in the political circuit, that even the educated ones often bring themselves down to that level to win elections.
Kajol is right in a way about politicians not educated enough. But when a celebrity speaks like this, people tend to (blindly) apply that point to all the politicians irrespective of their educational background and work.
Sonali clearly did not generalize the ENTIRE female population of India. She says MANY women. You can all go "not all women", but her opinion does have substance to it. I know a lot of women like the ones she mentions. She's definitely not wrong. Unfair inclusion in this list sorry Jammy.
Also fully agree with you about the fact that there are so many capable and independent women out there. But you don't have to say that like a disclaimer every time you have to talk about something that suggests otherwise.
😅😅😅 MANY is a lie.
The whole world & India even bows down to the homemakers for their unrecognised unacknowledged hard labour with NO holidays.
And, here's Sonali adding fire to the rising entitlement of men wanting women to do it all AND also provide for family.
You missed Preity zinta's interview in which she was asked about Metoo movement. I really like her but I found her views quite regressive and it feels like she did not know much about it. Still, she is my favourite celebrity.
I remember that moment. Kinda broke my heart because she has had the feeling of being ostracised in the industry but seemed to lack empathy for victims during the same time
@@TriedRefusedProductionsalso Rani Mukherjee saying even 2 month babies should learn self defence.
Certified by Akshay Kumar twice women have STILL BEEN
25 out of 25000 women chosen in ADVANCED self defence can ALSO be...
You've to understand you freeze at the moment. Or the men are way too heavily built & strong than the women you practiced with.
It's NOT physically possible for 99% women.
And ,it's time we acknowledged that.
Rani said we can't tell mom to tell their sons. Why NOT?
WHY can't the moms, dads, everyone tell their sons to know about consent?
@@TriedRefusedProductionsHow do you know they were all victims ? Just because they are woman you blindly believe them. What if tomorrow some Woman says "Anmol Jamwal sexually assaulted me"?. Will your followers still blindly support the Accuser just because she happens to be woman ?
At 3:08 , you are wrong she dint say all women or women in India but she said many women in India. So that don’t generalise
Hi Amol,
I recently saw a Koffee with Karan episode 2 from season 1 showcasing Rani and Kareena, where they included a segment in which various then male leading actors like Fardeen, John, Arjun Rampal and many more were openly discussing about the sex appeal and butt of those actresses and rating them on a scale of 1-10 and I could not fathom how normalised it was then. What's even more appalling is that both the actresses were laughing and saying thank you to those guys for being a sport. Give it a watch if you haven't already and maybe make a video on it as to how much of that content is normal for today's scenario as well. Would love to hear your views on it. ❤️
I remember watching it but I feel like most of them are in on it or well versed with what's going to happen. But also, the interviews in the mid 2000s were wild. Both in India and internationally. Its a catch 22 you know: we talk about interviews today being PR trained and boring but the moment someone let's loose, we dissect each and every word they say.
What exactly is wrong with it ? These days many women celebs and others showcase their body including the butts on social media.... it's a common thing now....
You can't say show is ok but u shouldn't talk about it 😂
@@TheUnrulyMonsterit is wrong. Women that wear something revealing whether it is a personal preference or for a role, it does not give permission for people to talk about their bodies especially in public or on television.
@@easyveganfoodie w.r.t role I can agree somewhat... but not if they are flaunting the thing openly... I mean the question anyways isn't about permission... as long as it's legal it's permitted.... but the question is one of decency.... which I think is not violated specially if the women in question are flaunting it left n right.... if a woman is somewhat timid and reserved I'd refrain from making such comments about her....
In one of the srk’s episode Kjo even asked little kids if srk was sexy 🤦♀️🤦♀️
I absolutely don't agree with Salman Khan on his point of having censor for OTT. The best part about OTT is that you can totally express whatever you feel without any guilt and for people who don't like the abuses and dirty scenes, mat dekho Bhai
@kochikame363 there is already a censor board for the same. But in the past, movies like Masti series and kyaa kool Hain hum series contains double meaning dialogues and objectionable scenes. Tab censor board kyaa kar raha thaa.
And as far as TV is concerned, i have stopped watching daily serials from a long time
@kochikame363 ye bhi theek hai
Says the person who hosts the og show that had people swearing, fighting and living in a toxic environment. If audience goes back and sees reality t.v shows worldwide are the ones who introduced vulgarity.
thank you for using subtitles on parts that are spoken in indian languages 😊
"A sorry attempt to defend one's own incompetence" - Best line from the vid.
Great job Jammy, these delusional "actors" NEED such reality check.
👏👏
Your take on hypocrite Rajeev is spot on. Bold of you to point it out.
Rajeev is the epitome symbol of hypocrisy and pointless vanity
He is the biggest hypocrite in the world that Rajeev Masand
she does realize that being a house wife (especially if living in a joint family or if they have kids) is actually a very tough job. Far from lazy.
The fact that she said that as a woman herself is sad.
What’s wrong with it ? She said many women not all women. It’s a fact. Not just in India all over. Her being a women does not mean she should just put a blind eye towards that kind of stuff
That first clip itself makes me want to jump off a cliff 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤣 the amount of cringe but Rajeev was super witty with his comeback there 🤣
Kajol is absolutely right i think it is high time we need pass a law regarding the education of leaders . Ofcourse it is not about the qualification but education gives you that perspective from all over the world so that you can become mature , ofc it is not a given but i think it will help a lot , and trashing kajol for saying that shows how immature we are
Rajeev Masand 360 turn is just amazing 👌😂
2:55 It's Completely Truth ...
If a woman fails to get a job then she can get married to a successful guy but if it happens with a man then it's really hard to stand up in the society
I don't think Sonali kulkari said anything wrong as she didn't generlise she said most of them that is well known truth in our society. you might live in a society where most of the women are self sufficient but the harsh truth is a men can marry a women who is unemployed but how many women would marry a man who is unemployed the difference is sky and earth
No one pressurise men to marry an unemployed woman. They still marry them because they don't want working women. And most of the women support their husband when they lose their job.
Nd many parents discriminate they female child give more importance to male child education so what do you expect women to do then. It's vicious system that has made to weak women dependent on man.
@@preetiraut7700 madam ji what is the responsibility of a women in society. Her in laws are maintained by her husband . Her parent is maintained by her brother (if it's there) . A woman make money to be self dependent and a man make money to to give his family a good living
@@sajalsharma249 ohh please if man work for his family then why man tend call their wives free loders haa ..... First you people call women free loders demean housewives call them they are free loders man constantly say to housewives "Pati ke paiso pe palti hai" nd when Women want to be financially independent then you people even have problem with it? You man shouldn't have called housewives women free loaders,pati ke paiso par palti hai then women wouldn't have called themselves independent women. It says no matter what women do man will always find exucses to demean women. Man hamesha koi na koi bahana dhundh hi lete women ko nicha dikhane ka.
@@screensafari17 a man wants an unemployed woman .but what about a woman wanting a man with 6 digit salary and sarkari naukri . Sad thing is if I say this fact I will be termed as misoginist
Shahid Kapoor already knew what he had signed up for during the making. Anyone can figure it out his character was written way too weak and without much importance , he still shines in some scenes like the one where Ranveer asks him to see Deepika. But overall it was written for Ranveer only he was brilliant but the story revolved just around him with much more screen time and much more impactful scenes. Maybe script was written like both characters will have equal fight but on sets it became completely different and with Ranveer already having worked with SLB was favouring him more .
oh god! It was not about Shahid or Ranveer, It was about Padmavati! The importance of a character cannot be always measured by screen time, just because the character of ranveer has more screen time doesn’t mean SLB is ‘favouring’ him. He did what the story required him to do.
Shahid kapoor plays the supporting actor. Any outsider can do this role. Shahid looks like a 40 kg king. Don't know where his mind while signing supporting actor. I think, he has no brain. He has to take 5 soak almonds in early morning.
Um, you completely missed the point sir.
He wasn't talking about the role. He was talaking about what was transpiring during filming.
Bhansali getting assaulted, Deepika getting threatened, riots in the country.
No slb the baised chick cutted his ss which they shoot but cut his part thats why he was disappointed and dp Rs pr did their work 🤡 but anyways Kabir Singh did justice to him
The south event wasn't the first of its own. There was an actor, T Rajndar, of some film and he chided Sai Dhansika host+actress on her missing out his name while hosting, and she apologised profusely over it, while the gaudy remarks from the veteran kept on coming, and the two cast-mates kept on laughing. It was atrocious. The veteran is the father of now bigger star, Silambarasan TR, and only Actor Vishal came out in her support. It's just too much drama happening over there outside the movie.
Selmon bhoi feeling sad, that actors with actual talent can become stars while working for OTT platforms, while the MAFIA of big theater and studios are FORCED to acknowledge the change.
No More Eid ke 100 Crore every year.
Tamil & Telugu filmmakers should stop their obsession with pale skinned north Indian actresses & give opportunities to more local women.
yes as salman khan said @ 4:57 onwards the OTT space is sadly becoming a place for watching uncensored content there has be some sort of censorship rules in place in this matter i agree with him ......👍
Sonali Kulkarni took what seems to be a personal issue and decided to vent it out publicly. I have come across several Maharashtrian women who think a woman's worth lies in how endlessly and tirelessly they can work, how much they can sacrifice, how less comfort they need. God forbid if one decides to rest. Yes, there are women out there who are lazy , of course there are. But how many get the privilege of being that once married? How many indian men out there saying rest up ,I will do EVERYTHING.
Jammy your intros are getting more and more hilarious! Keep up the good work. Big fan of the channel
For 6:30 Do you know what is authentic Indian dress. No. Coz after mughal invasion the culture changed entirely and now the modern babas brainwashed entire generation into believing that Authentic Indian dress is "Western culture ' and the Mughal dress is"Indian Culture " . Irony is that these same babas shout that India is rich 5000 year old culture. But for women they don't consider Vedic culture as indian culture. Just search the dresses and status of women in Vedic era. Whatever you hv been told since childhood is Western, u would realise that it's actually Indian Culture. Be it dress as just a fabric of comfort, sex not a taboo, position of women in society,
Often heard that LWs distorted history, but the fact is LW and RW both distort history as per their convenience. See the difference is ideas of Vedic culture and Abrahmic culture. With all due respect in Abrahmic religion length of clothes is equal to modesty. Contrary in Vedic culture for any auspicious rituals like yagna visiting temples stiched clothes are prohibited. That's why pandits perform arti wearing lungi and it is same for women. That's why u will find many such sculptures and paintings of bare chest women inside temples. If skin show was sin, if showing affection was sin, would our ancestors have allowed it in the holy premises of temples. People now know about Vedic culture only through distorted version of Ramanand Sagar and modern Babas. They don't know sanskrit, didn't study Vedic culture, didn't study vedas but believe babas.
Sonali Kulkarni literally used the words "Bahot Saari Ladkiyaan" which means she wasn't generalizing all women's.
Exactly!!!
That's what I was going to say
Exactly
'BOHAT SAARI LADKIYAAN' is a generalisation sir. While she has every right for that take based on her experiences, it still is a generalisation
@@TriedRefusedProductionsIs she wrong though? Living in tier 1 cities will blind you from the harsh reality that exists in 80% of India.
In my personal opinion, it seems that you may have misunderstood Sonali Kulkarni's point.😅 I believe she was trying to convey that men are often not even considered as potential partners unless they meet certain criteria. As a result, men have to invest a significant amount of time and effort to reach a certain standard. Many women desire partners who are in their prime, which is why Sonali made the remark about "women of this generation being lazy." This comment was not without reason, as men strive to transform and develop themselves to meet the general preferences of women. On the other hand, women sometimes perceive men's preferences as unreasonable and regard themselves as the ultimate prize right from the start. It's important to note that these are just my personal thoughts on the matter...
Fair enough and everyone like Sonali is also providing their perspective on the topic and I think that's why it becomes important to acknowledge THERE IS NO right or wrong in 'many indian women being lazy' but people can express whether they agree or disagree based on their life experiences.
@@TriedRefusedProductionsher statement was many women in this country and not every women in this country, so I think people who got offended by this were just trying to make something out of nothing.
Agreed ... Was a bold statement but there is truth to what she said
this is largely true for men lmao
You say these are your personal thoughts on the matter, so obviously that is your interpretation of what Sonali said. India is not yet so developed that "many women" even have the practical privilege of choosing their husbands as a fundamental right. The amount of women that reject men because of lack of money is far outweighed by the sheer amount of women who work hard through their early twenties just to fill the pockets of their future husbands in the name of marital "gifts". Even among educated families, the list of "gifts" from the bride is far longer and far more valuable than that of the groom. I come from a middle class background and I started earning right in my final year of college. But will this money go to my future savings? No. In this economy middle-class fathers are simply not capable enough to prepare their daughters' dowries on their own. My entire savings will go in paying loans after my marriage, and I'll have to work even then to support my husband, along with kitchen responsibilities. It all depends on the people you surround yourself with. You surround yourself with the privileged 1% in this country and bury your head in the sand then ofcourse you're going to have an opinion that is different from actual reality.
I'm in love with you narrator ❤❤❤ well studied, well observed and very precise video....
I dont think Sonali Kulkarnis words were generalizing the entire female population of this country. She clearly mentioned that she was talking about a mindset within some younger women. In my opinion she didnt deserve the backlash she got.
She said most women in India and I guess that's what caused the outrage.
@@TriedRefusedProductions It is 100% correct. I bet any women to marry a men earning less than her....She won't...Jyoti Maurya case is not an isolate event.....And no, 0.5% of higher echelons doesn't constitute India....
@@TriedRefusedProductionsthat's your perception. And it's not true, Most women are hypergameous in nature and they always depends upon more financially and physically dominant men to have a family. That's the naturality. Very few exceptions can't be taken into consideration and vice-versa can't generalise either. But you can't change the inner desire and blame on patriarchy and other reasons
@@harshraj6116 my Bhabhi married to a man who was unemployed , my mother married to a man who was poor even lived in poverty with him. My masi also married to man who is lazy alcoholic she have work in order fullfill her nd children's requirements.
@@harshraj6116 even where I live many man are just last , alcoholic, nd their wives work earn money nd those unemployed man do eve teasing many so should I start Generalizing that all man are bad. If women is your house is lazy , unemployed nd gold digger that doesn't mean all women are same. Please take care of Women of your house who are bad okay mr.
Sonali Kulkarni is right. Its annoying when you see so many girls like that around you
Adipurush PR Team took inspiration from Arjun Kapoor which gave them big opening but also the biggest fall at box office
I think Rajeev was making point how the public took that statement and attacked ananya.
I agree with Sonali's point though, me being a girl have seen some of my friends just wanting a rich husband. If she said "kuch" instead of "bhot sari" it would have been a very valid point. Also, it tells you, if you are in public eye, how carefully you have to pick your words.
Robot Shankar part was so creepy. Felt like puking
What I found funny is you could downright insult these star kids and they'll be like. "yeah, exactly..." Without realising what's really being said. 😂😂 Like in the case of siddhant chaturvedi case😅
Thank you for the English subtitles. Im not fluent in Hindi at all so this helps 💛
what Sonali Kulkarni said is not wrong. you cannot say that her opinion was tone-deaf. there are still many women in the subcontinent region that do think of living on their husband's income. and I am not trying to demean them. the reason for this is happening is because of the Lackings in education, family members pressure, sociological habits and unwise way of thinking. and yes, it is indeed a very unfortunate thing that is still going on, but we cannot just ignore it. it will surely change one day only if we are honest enough to accept it and try to eradicate this type of thinking from all the peoples head.
I totally agree
Love how you consciously make an effort to be balanced in your perception, Always a pleasure listening to you.
I dont think Salman and Sonali are wrong .. Sonali was right most women want rich guy instead of working hard and getting rich and Salman was right vulgarity is bad .. you can close eyes and think everything what you experience or like is good but thats not the case everything has its impact and vulgar films have bad impacts, and not criticising women for being lazy will not encourage them. (Edited part : If someone calls me lazy i will be working really hard, it would encourage me but nowadays ppl get offended on very small things)
I dont intend to say one is right or wrong because these are opinions and all a result of the life and experiences they've had. So while I don't agree with Sonali and Salman because their takes are way more nuanced than having a black or white opinion, that's why they make it to the video of 'controversial takes'
Sonali is wrong. Most of Indian women are independent.
And what is vulgar? Dancing in half naked outfits, romanticizing with a man of father's age, Cracking double meaning jokes? Why not censor "Character Dheela" type songs, they also have bad impact. Just as with mass entertainers, makers say "nobody is forcing you to watch it", why doesnot same hold true for other type of content? If noone watches it, it wont be made.
@kochikame363 bhai govt ko bhi employees chahiye yan govt bina emplyees k chlti hai?
@@TriedRefusedProductions yes you are right then it means you misrepresented them because they didn't said their opinion are best and not false sonali didn't said all indian women are like that.. Salman also did vulgar songs etc, but vulgarity on these tv series he was talking about is too much, you can't watch these tv series which he was talking about with your family or even with your siblings.. i mean in many movies se* scene are hidden you dont have to see a women or men nude completely.. i think Gangs of wasepur is good example it is perfectly captured bad side of society and s*x scenes without showing nudes or too much maa behn ki gaali .. nowadays its seems from tv series that no one in india completes a sentence without a gaali & every episode must have nude or se* scenes
@9:05 to 9:22 - Best of all interviews in the video. Appreciate Jammy for putting this across.
Why and where Kajol is wrong I didn't get that!!! Yes it's true education gives you a view point and clarity
2:51 she stated facts dude. Women day in and day out blames men for whatever happens to them, then finds a rick brad to live a hassle free life. Don't be a dog to get sympathy from women
If Kajol had the educational system background she would know the difference between democracy and a technocracy. And by her own logic I have more authority on it as I have a PhD from UT Austin and she does not. Representative democracy is about carrying the will of people. If people want to vote based on education and not interest it's up to them.
Dude, how are you soo good with intros man!!!😂….dude u r the eptiome of funny intros!!!😂😂😂……janhavi kapoor scene was hilarious!!!!!!
not sara smiling with pride over rohit shetty talking about her basically begging him to cast her🤦🏽♀️
That was so cringey episode.
@@ashwinidesai4051 Its also sad.
The clip before the intro was damn hilarious😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sonali Kulkarni is 100% correct, mumbai and delhi people should get out of their A.C. homes and see reality, reality is not politically correct. I completely support Sonali ji.
Correct 👍
Your comment is really stupid. People from Delhi and Mumbai, really? Also Sonali should have said some instead of bohot saari.
What does that mean? Get out of Ac homes and do what?
@@LiberatedNotes read carefully before asking
@@KP-2105 it seems you never went out from your AC room where I live majority of man are lazy, alcoholic , unemployed, nd their wives works do Household as well job. Not to mention those man also do Eve teasing etc..
Kajol was right tho😏
No Kajol was completely wrong in all her assesment..
Yes Education is necessary but that don't mean it's reason India changes slowly.. India changes slowly and is quite poor because of Socialism and most educated class in India are themselves Socialist/Leftist so education is beyond point here..
Rahul and Rajiv Gandhia are bith western educated, what's their achievements? Null& void.
Education isn't prove of worthiness and intelligence, you can hire hundred of intellectual who will at your payroll but only if you have will power to do it..
Remember Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel? Go check his education profile..
How did you not feature “ Get out of my studio “ of Devi and Vishwak Sen. It’s a cult classic meme in Telugu market now 😂😂
THAT was covered in a previous episode!
WTH wrong with Robo Shankar. Such misogynistic and objectifying remarks towards Hansika and no one says anything. Looks like Hansika was against performing a scene in the movie but he insisted on touching her. Good that he’s been called out for such sleazy remarks on public forums.
He has a wife and two kids bruh . 😑😐 biwi bacho ke saath bhi aise baat Kartha hoga
@@_AZBT_ASHUTOSHKUSHWAHA-vm3fh I was thinking the same. These men are married and they make such comments. Such an embarrassment to their wives.
Loved it❤
Sonali Kulkarni saying women are lazy is the same as Kim Kardashian saying "get off your ass and work" 😭 such tone deaf statements and what's absolutely wild is Sonali Kulkarni is an amazing actor but has absolutely no idea about her own privilege.
What Sonali said is absolutely true .. educated women given a choice would prefer marrying wealthy man with no intention of their own career
Did anyone ever follow up with the cast about their indifference to Robo Shankar's comments? How awful for the actress to find out afterwards what had been said.
I disagree with your point on sonali's statement what she said is a fact and I agree with her, she said "BAHOT SAARI LADKIYAAN not " HAR LADKIYAAN " So your point is wrong and girls(as sonali mentioned) exist.
Sonali Kulkarni nd Kajol ek dum perfect or sahi bat bola hai 👍 truth
Sonali Kulkarni said "there are lots of such women ", and certainly are.