The mysteries of the elusive F-117 Nighthawk

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 299

  • @Interestingengineeringofficial
    @Interestingengineeringofficial  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
    *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

  • @lemmythebulldog8812
    @lemmythebulldog8812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    1977 and still looks like a futuristic fighter plane

    • @evanaja8658
      @evanaja8658 ปีที่แล้ว

      1975's hopeless diamond project began.

    • @kwikd5193
      @kwikd5193 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A turkey could fly better tho

  • @exist
    @exist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    Still to this day, one of the best looking Aircrafts ever built.

    • @amoskouame5608
      @amoskouame5608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was an awesome technology ...

    • @robertdawg4754
      @robertdawg4754 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It was ugly af

    • @vxyz5219
      @vxyz5219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@robertdawg4754 You're one of the few I've seen to think so. How is it ugly?

    • @Cinoth
      @Cinoth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's all in the eye of the beholder.

    • @Powerof7even
      @Powerof7even ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vxyz5219 It's an odd shape, I wouldn't say ugly myself but I can see how people see the flat front and prism cockpit as ugly. I personally think it's cool as fuck though.

  • @herbertkeithmiller
    @herbertkeithmiller ปีที่แล้ว +28

    The F-117 earned a nickname from the Saudi Arabians who worked beside it in operation desert storm
    alshabah, the Ghost.
    Which I think is one of the coolest nicknames of what airplane ever.

    • @MartaMarta-to4ex
      @MartaMarta-to4ex 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ever heard about goat sucker? 🎉😂

  • @zelmansamuel2072
    @zelmansamuel2072 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It really made me sad. When I heard about the Night Hawks retirement. I know it was not in service. . But the narrator said it. It made me sad.

  • @SinSGone
    @SinSGone ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I just saw one yesterday 2-16-23. Good to see them flying.

  • @sfsunitedspace9985
    @sfsunitedspace9985 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Anybody remember thinking that this plane looked speedy as hell but then realized it doesn’t even go half the speed of sound?

  • @Samuraistar92
    @Samuraistar92 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was engaged to one of the original engineers for this aircraft. But unfortunately he died before the wedding. He talked a lot about this airplane a lot. He worked for lockeed from about 1950s to about 1990.

  • @baller4686
    @baller4686 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk is a retired American single-seat, subsonic twin-engine stealth attack aircraft developed by Lockheed's secretive Skunk Works division and operated by the United States Air Force (USAF). It was the first operational aircraft to be designed with stealth technology.
    The F-117 was based on the Have Blue technology demonstrator. The Nighthawk's maiden flight took place in 1981 at Groom Lake, Nevada, and the aircraft achieved initial operating capability status in 1983. The aircraft was shrouded in secrecy until it was revealed to the public in 1988. Of the 64 F-117s built, 59 were production versions, with the other five being prototypes.
    The F-117 was widely publicized for its role in the Gulf War of 1991. Although it was commonly referred to as the "Stealth Fighter", it was strictly an attack aircraft. F-117s took part in the conflict in Yugoslavia, where one was shot down by a surface-to-air missile (SAM) in 1999. The U.S. Air Force retired the F-117 in April 2008, primarily due to the fielding of the F-22 Raptor.[4] Despite the type's official retirement, a portion of the fleet has been kept in airworthy condition, and Nighthawks have been observed flying since 2009.[5] AVIONICS
    The F-117 has quadruple-redundant fly-by-wire flight controls. To lower development costs, the avionics, fly-by-wire systems, and other systems and parts were derived from the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet, and McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle. The parts were originally described as spares in budgets for these aircraft, to keep the F-117 project secret.[citation needed] The aircraft is equipped with sophisticated navigation and attack systems integrated into a digital avionics suite. It navigates primarily by GPS and high-accuracy inertial navigation. Missions are coordinated by an automated planning system that can automatically perform all aspects of an attack mission, including weapons release.[44] Targets are acquired by a thermal imaging infrared system, paired with a laser rangefinder/laser designator that finds the range and designates targets for laser-guided bombs. The F-117's split internal bay can carry 5,000 pounds (2,300 kg) of ordnance. Typical weapons are a pair of GBU-10, GBU-12, or GBU-27 laser-guided bombs, two BLU-109 penetration bombs, or two Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) GPS/INS guided stand-off bombs. COMBAT OVER YUGOSLAVIA
    Main article: 1999 F-117A shootdown
    Canopy of F-117 shot down in Serbia in March 1999 at the Museum of Aviation in Belgrade
    One F-117 (AF ser. no. 82-0806) was lost to enemy action. It was downed during an Operation Allied Force mission against the Army of Yugoslavia on 27 March 1999.[56] The aircraft was acquired by a fire control radar at a distance of 8.1 mi (13 km) and an altitude of 5.0 mi (8 km). SA-3s were then launched by a Yugoslav version of the Soviet Isayev S-125 "Neva" (NATO name SA-3 "Goa") anti-aircraft missile system.[56][57][58] The launcher was run by the 3rd Battalion of the 250th Air Defence Missile Brigade under the command of Colonel Zoltán Dani.[59]
    After the explosion, the aircraft became uncontrollable, forcing the pilot to eject.[56] The pilot was recovered six hours later by a United States Air Force Pararescue team.[56][60] The stealth technology from the downed F-117 may have been acquired by Russia and China.[61] The U.S. did not attempt to destroy the wreckage; senior Pentagon officials claimed that its technology was already dated and no longer important to protect.[28]
    American sources state that a second F-117 was targeted and damaged during the campaign, allegedly on 30 April 1999.[62][63] The aircraft returned to Spangdahlem base,[63] but it supposedly never flew again.[64][65] The USAF continued using the F-117 during Operation Allied Force.[66]

  • @adithyansunil1153
    @adithyansunil1153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    man Lockheed surely knows how to build good jets, the f22 raptor, f117 nighthawk, SR 71 blackbird, and the hypersonic darkstar in top gun maverick 🔥🔥🔥

    • @AlVil
      @AlVil ปีที่แล้ว

      northtrop grumman are much better

    • @daviedood2503
      @daviedood2503 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skunk works designed dark star 🤨

    • @silverscientists8130
      @silverscientists8130 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the legendary p 38 lightning that started skunk works

    • @eac1235
      @eac1235 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@daviedood2503Skunk Works is part of Lockheed, always has been.

  • @abcnt
    @abcnt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was the technology they had during the late 70s.. Mind blown.

  • @OiVinn-eq1ml
    @OiVinn-eq1ml ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One of my favorite jets. It's design & sleekness look so futuristic

  • @Genieprep
    @Genieprep 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    That is pretty amazing. Engineering at its finest!

  • @erichpizer1
    @erichpizer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    it is was and always will be a true legend . it was love at first sight for me

  • @Rodrigodrt
    @Rodrigodrt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Let's face it, the f117 has the coolest looking exhaust ever

  • @SrdjaZlopogledja
    @SrdjaZlopogledja 3 ปีที่แล้ว +258

    Sorry we didnt know it was invisible. Greetings from Serbia!

    • @judgerivers7631
      @judgerivers7631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Serbia shot it down by accident..✌🏼😎

    • @jeshkam
      @jeshkam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Serbians, the biggest Putin admirers in the world. They shot it down by pure coincidence, but yet they're gonna boast about it until the end of the world. So lame... 🤣😂😁

    • @dabulls1g
      @dabulls1g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      You don’t get points for doing it with pure luck.

    • @borba5825
      @borba5825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@jeshkam we shot 2,we admired USA untill it started it's war of agression on Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua and many other innocent countries.

    • @jeshkam
      @jeshkam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@borba5825 Have you also stopped admiring Soviet Union/Russia for their wars, especially the WW2, and against Georgia, Afghanistan & Ukraine?

  • @2sqnbandit379
    @2sqnbandit379 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Never used as a fighter. It was primarily a bomber.

  • @grahamgallick2928
    @grahamgallick2928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Sonic booms are no issue for stealth. I consider the lancer an early stealth bomber because it could come in slow drop a payload big enough to blow a hole and create the lakes for the U.A.E. and then fly away really fast. I was a kid when I first realized it because of watching the bombing of Baghdad on TV. You saw a shit ton of explosions and then the anti aircraft guns going off but by then the lancer was landing

  • @soraisfinallyhere1305
    @soraisfinallyhere1305 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So cool looking loved it since a kid

  • @matts8039
    @matts8039 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If only planes were named by the soldiers:
    F-117 Wobbly Goblin

    • @WhuDhat
      @WhuDhat ปีที่แล้ว

      lmao right

  • @blurglide
    @blurglide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "Iron ball", not ion, and despite the "F" designation, this was no fighter

    • @epicspaces9434
      @epicspaces9434 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      when I see it, I feel deep in my heart, that is a fighter than needs just gloves

    • @some.randomdude
      @some.randomdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@epicspaces9434 no, any fighter capable of firing bvr (beyond visual range) missiles would need a radar, thus increasing its cross section, thus making it less stealthy. that would defeat the entire purpose of the nighthawk, a stealthy bomber.

  • @andihaka1143
    @andihaka1143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ofc serbians would shot it down,having precise information from the french filoslavs about the location of deployment, flight trajectory, altitude and target.Not to mention the technical information and knowabout delivered by the russians.

    • @georgebaggy
      @georgebaggy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Don't forget the crucial fact that its bomb bays were open.

    • @pavlematovic2116
      @pavlematovic2116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@georgebaggy again not true they saw him long before that, the Americans say that because they are ashamed vvv.th-cam.com/users/vatch?v=EuifD1K0lcK&t=585s

  • @Turtisland
    @Turtisland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6:00 this reminds me of when the U.S . Got hold of a Japanese Zero airplane in WW2 and learned its weaknesses.

  • @duckbizniz663
    @duckbizniz663 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The F-117 is a distinctive looking fighter jet. The multi-panel structure is unique. If the F-117 was shot down by Russian radar guided missiles then its radar-stealth capability cannot justify its aerodynamic dynamic instability. The multi-panel structure slows the fighter jet down and makes it less maneuverable. If you look at the F-22 and the F-35 these new stealth fighter jets clearly have abandoned the multi-panel design. Which brings into question if the Russian mathematician (Pyotr Ufimtsev) theories on radar avoidance have any validity. Only the US have enough resources to actually build something a crazy Russian mathematician dreamed up. Maybe it was a crazy Russian decoy the KGB thought up to get the Americans to waste time, effort, and money building something that had no advantage. What the KGB did not know was that the Americans were crazy enough to build a functional F-117. But the new F-22 and F-35 prove that not even American money nor American ingenuity can transform a KGB decoy into a fighter jet with real advantages.

    • @vinamaru
      @vinamaru 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely right.

  • @Jadfitree
    @Jadfitree ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1977? Can’t Imagine what they have today 💀

    • @evanaja8658
      @evanaja8658 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Stealth drone, flip smartphone.

  • @jamesm7649
    @jamesm7649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A true assassin plane. Sneak in, drop two precision bombs, sneak out.

  • @chikokishi7030
    @chikokishi7030 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The door challenge question to "have blue" was "i have RED the book"

  • @georgebaggy
    @georgebaggy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It was not the first true stealth fighter. It was not a fighter at all. It was a bomber.

  • @randybramstedt5483
    @randybramstedt5483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Nighthawk was generally a failure. The shoot down of a Nighthawk in Yugoslavia doomed it as U.S. analysts realized long wavelength radar could see it. It was not retired for cost savings as we immediately embarked on the joint strike fighter program which resulted in an ineffective and problem-ridden F-35, the most expensive military project in history. Further advances in scanning radar technology also played a role in its retirement unlike what so many fake U.S. military propaganda sites like the National Interest claim. The F-117 was a toxic, embarrassing failure, so the Pentagon cut its losses. The biggest military contribution of the Nighthawk was flying over Super Bowl events and parades.

  • @edwardv7991
    @edwardv7991 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The best radar is spotters. You can't hide from visible eye unless you have cloaking technology 5:39

    • @TheBency
      @TheBency 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Darwin Biler That would be cool but unfortunately, F117 doesn't have that tech.

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not really, because you can't launch a SAM using a spotter as guidance.

    • @YonIon996
      @YonIon996 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheBency 2025 we gonna have that. CoD Bo2 told me!

  • @jeremyhicks2449
    @jeremyhicks2449 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hollman 2002-2005. 9th FS.

  • @daxkedgx8698
    @daxkedgx8698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IE forgot to mention what the night hawk was not a fighter. it was and still is a strike jet and that's it....

  • @JeremyThomson-ng8dp
    @JeremyThomson-ng8dp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whys the top angled, the bottom flat, dont radar waves come from ground radar?

  • @joshuakotrc5287
    @joshuakotrc5287 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In project wingman the cr-105 matches the same thing with the f-117 nighthawk

  • @defdef1354
    @defdef1354 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I live next to a navy base and occasionally will see something similar to this flying at night.

    • @yanni2112
      @yanni2112 ปีที่แล้ว

      I used to live near Miramar while I was at 32nd St San Diego, time of the Tomcat F-14! Saw lots flying right over us on HWY 15.

  • @Pwj579
    @Pwj579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    ridiculously over simplification....read The Skunk Works by Ben Rich for the full story

    • @machupikachu1085
      @machupikachu1085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup. Your TH-cam video about the history of the F117 is way more comprehensive and informative.

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@machupikachu1085 This video got a lot of stuff wrong though.

    • @machupikachu1085
      @machupikachu1085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nick-tm2sw that's probably true my dude. But, I find there are three types of TH-camrs: Creators, Consumers, and Complainers.
      I'm cool with the first two, but every once in a while, I gotta call out that third class. There are indeed cordial and classy ways to discuss points of contention. Those smug, haughty 'You're doing it wrong' comments however, contribute nothing.
      Cheers!

  • @Pay-No-Mind
    @Pay-No-Mind ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm 99.99% certain that "Ion ball paints" is an error and in fact, what was meant was iron ball paint / Iron nanosphere paint. As "Ion ball paint" doesn't exist. 😂
    Iron Ball also makes sense as you'd want tiny nanosphere particles of a ferrous material that would absorb the EM Radiation and excite them into oscillating then dissipating that energy as heat.
    My curiosity and interest have now been piqued and I really want to know how much heat energy was created during use, what was the lowest/highest/average, and what changes or adjustments were needed to compensate for the additional heat created by the paint as the Nighthawk (and SR-71 Blackbird ) already had serious issues with heat/overheating that needed resolving, though I think the Nighthawks heat issues were from its body shape/design, the instrumentation, engines, and paint whereas the SR-71's heat issues were mainly caused by its intense speed, the very high altitude of flight, also it's design and materials as well as its engines as the higher altitude and thinner the air the harder it becomes for that heat to dissipate out away from the source.
    I'm looking forward to "losing" a couple of weeks just reading up and researching on these amazing pieces of history 😅 think - to be one of the designers, engineers or test pilots of these beautiful pieces of machinery! Amazing, Imagine showing Da Vinci what exists in 2023 and what we've accomplished as a species technologically speaking.

  • @DOI_ARTS
    @DOI_ARTS ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The only plane to have killed Steven Seagal

  • @jamesbannerman4804
    @jamesbannerman4804 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They got lucky because the Airforce flew the same routes at the Sametime, easier to track.

  • @Spiridon823
    @Spiridon823 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A što više ne lete😢😢😢

  • @Hanal503
    @Hanal503 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Masterpiece🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

  • @SlavaBogu888
    @SlavaBogu888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    NATO lost around 150+ planes in 1999 including 4 destroyed and 1 crash landed F117 Nighthawks, B2A Spirit, B52 bomber, also not to mention 40 SAS members that were shot down in transport helicopter.

    • @kronk3892
      @kronk3892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Links

    • @kronk3892
      @kronk3892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      B2 was never lost

    • @shipsndshit
      @shipsndshit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No B2s have ever been lost in combat

    • @acoustic296
      @acoustic296 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol where did you get that info? on your dog?😂

    • @SlavaBogu888
      @SlavaBogu888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      B2 bomber was shot down, it was B2 Spirit of Missouri, and i do not blame you for not knowing that, your government isn't that stupid to publicly admit that they have lost a plane worth 2b dollars.

  • @martinrps13
    @martinrps13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I miss hearing these things break them sound barrier. We lived in New Mexico when I was a kid and they had unrestricted flight access.

    • @chiefosceola14
      @chiefosceola14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      These didn’t break the sound barrier

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chiefosceola14 some of them did….must be modified or have engine work

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@martinrps13 Why would they modify it to break the sound barrier when they specifically designed it to be subsonic in the first place. You must be thinking of some other aircraft.

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nick-tm2sw I have no clue of their motives….but those things would make sonic booms all the time

    • @eac1235
      @eac1235 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@martinrps13 No they did not. You are delusional or high from sniffing glue.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realy I like this powerful aircraft like I want to have infinit numbers

  • @owenlien1593
    @owenlien1593 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funny story one of the test pilots thought it was a space vehicle lol

  • @jefferywarner2916
    @jefferywarner2916 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It bounces like particles

  • @jefferywarner2916
    @jefferywarner2916 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A stinger missile would have a hard time shooting down the 117 unlike the F 22

  • @eviltrickyspider5266
    @eviltrickyspider5266 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It reminds me of Doctor Jonathan reads aliens spacecraft in it's dimensions and looks.

  • @STASHYNSKYI
    @STASHYNSKYI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Don't mess with Serbs .

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha, everyone messes with the serbs.

    • @pavlematovic2116
      @pavlematovic2116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nick-tm2sw xD vvv.th-cam.com/users/vatch?v=EuifD1K0lcK&t=585s

  • @JackSabahanmy
    @JackSabahanmy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @jdl.1234
    @jdl.1234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bert and Ernie made it fly.....Truth

  • @randybramstedt5483
    @randybramstedt5483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    None of the Nighthawks flying around sporadically are combat ready. The are in an official state of retirement. The units in existence today are beyond useability and generally poorly maintained. That are not a testament to U.S. aerospace success.

  • @Buddha363
    @Buddha363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just got a model of this ❤

  • @tukangngaplod1069
    @tukangngaplod1069 ปีที่แล้ว

    the flying EMC test chamber

  • @pavlematovic2116
    @pavlematovic2116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sorry, we didn't know he was invisible 🥲

  • @jayethompson3414
    @jayethompson3414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1981…think about that. Move forward 40 years, what’s out there now?

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 ปีที่แล้ว

    how you fly aqnd steer a wing in a wing

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 ปีที่แล้ว

    a triangle frisby disc

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 ปีที่แล้ว

    swept back wing to the tail

  • @beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825
    @beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    And all this lovely story about stealth fighter,best in world bla bla bla ended by obsolete missile shot in Serbia!!!
    😆😆😆

    • @SlavaBogu888
      @SlavaBogu888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If it was only one, few of them indeed were shot down. 😉

    • @СрбиндоГроба-й5к
      @СрбиндоГроба-й5к 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jeshkam pure luck hahahahahhahqhahahahahqhq 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @revolutionday1
    @revolutionday1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You lost me at "fighter".

  • @tyukipji239
    @tyukipji239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Stealth capability,what mysteries,serbian force shoot down that F117,why they praise,its 0 capability.

    • @MadX8
      @MadX8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're not stealth anymore if your enemy knows where to look at. That's precisely why one F117 has been shot down. Nothing to do with the aircraft capabilities

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MadX8 That just isn't true. You can know where to look but if you can't get a consistent radar track on it then you can launch a SAM at it. There have been instances when they knew the F-117 was close but couldn't actually launch anything because of the stealth of the aircraft.

  • @marcusnilsson7179
    @marcusnilsson7179 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I heard USA tested this planes stealth in serbia

  • @anthonymaranan4237
    @anthonymaranan4237 ปีที่แล้ว

    tHis iS a feAtuRe, noT a deFecT

  • @lukaof1970
    @lukaof1970 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Serbian air defense.

  • @blazingguyop
    @blazingguyop 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hahaha US indirectly given that plane to Russia so that we won't have any suspicious 😅

  • @johnmoriarty6158
    @johnmoriarty6158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You could buy a piece of a F-117 from street vendors is what I heard.

  • @jordan2760
    @jordan2760 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To think it stated from paper planes 🙉

  • @ismailzulfiqar3552
    @ismailzulfiqar3552 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice vedio sir love from pakistan

  • @charlottelatinda633
    @charlottelatinda633 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm.. 50 a.n.d m.y. husband 54 we are both retired with over $3 million in net worth and no dept's. Currently living smart and frugal with our money.serving and investing life style in the stock market made it possible for us this early even till now we earn weekly. Thanks to fire movement.

    • @RobertSmith-nn5jm
      @RobertSmith-nn5jm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm a young dad, I'm really glad to hear your story it inspires me.

    • @tony2961
      @tony2961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is fire movement please.?

    • @charlottelatinda633
      @charlottelatinda633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tony2961 Fire means Financial Independence Retire Early.
      It's been a movement teaching people financial independence and how to retire debt free through solid investment and frugal lifestyle.

    • @tony2961
      @tony2961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charlottelatinda633 Thanks for replying I will read more about fire movement.

    • @jeremysanchez5545
      @jeremysanchez5545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charlottelatinda633 Your story is inspiring I'm 38 trying to achieve this goal you achieved.share some tips please so others can actually learn.
      You haven't still share any idea on how you earn weekly.

  • @veljkoventola2097
    @veljkoventola2097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is the so-called invisible plane that was hit and destroyed in Serbia ... What a stunning technology.😂🤫

  • @brahmoone
    @brahmoone 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    glue..???

  • @jermainesherls1949
    @jermainesherls1949 ปีที่แล้ว

    So. This is why russia has the suu 47 n china has j20. From getting f117 tech????

  • @ricardomilos69
    @ricardomilos69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    John Cena piloted it

  • @umeshchittirai
    @umeshchittirai 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Imagine an obsolete Air defense system shot down stealth fighter. Russia has latest missile defense systems like S-400 and S-500 now.

    • @umeshchittirai
      @umeshchittirai 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chasseausanglier3390 of course. Defense contractors get the hard currency and govt will get the security. Win win situation for both

    • @borba5825
      @borba5825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Massimo Hack it happened twice, no luck, just great air defence operators.

    • @arizonad8012
      @arizonad8012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Massimo Hack Well US maybe need luck and all shit to keep them on the top on the scale.Some countries just have better training and more brain.

    • @David-zo7bg
      @David-zo7bg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      850 sorties and one shot down. Something to be proud of:)

    • @arizonad8012
      @arizonad8012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Massimo Hack US can strike people, but everything they do to others is coming back to them.They killed 3000 people in Serbia in bombing in 1999, but one terrorist attack 9/11 made lose more.Whole cementaries are full with their veterans, and 3 times more of disabled.Earthquakes, tornados, tsunamis, hurricanes, people killing each other on the street, school shootings, name it.Karma is free of charge.They are land of homless and unjustice.My hometown has 300000 people and no homeless, maybe we are not rich but still not on the streets.You watch to much propaganda, so you have wrong image of about whole situation.But I don't care keep going.

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 ปีที่แล้ว

    cover thrust engine

  • @danz3rgaming640
    @danz3rgaming640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First usa stealth aircraft made by using Soviet mathematician calculation
    🤣 What does Soviet union was doing
    🍻 🐻

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does it matter if it was soviet math? They weren't the ones that made the first stealth aircraft.

  • @SaxSith
    @SaxSith 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The mysteries ended in Serbia 😅

  • @monsterseweg89eersterechts75
    @monsterseweg89eersterechts75 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simonouthol

  • @TamagoHead
    @TamagoHead ปีที่แล้ว

    Nobody wanted to fly a tiny expensive ugly bomber. I think flight certs were 4 Mos or Something very outrageous.

  • @Bug-Intercourser
    @Bug-Intercourser ปีที่แล้ว

    omg hiiiii :3

  • @ethanfriend6305
    @ethanfriend6305 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shit brown shirt n bdu’s 😂👍🏻

  • @neodelta5882
    @neodelta5882 ปีที่แล้ว

    More doomsday weapons

  • @joselitosiscar5966
    @joselitosiscar5966 ปีที่แล้ว

    fall down in surbia. buwahahaa

    • @christophertesla
      @christophertesla 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Learn how to actually read and spell before you comment next time. I don't know the country "surbia" but if you are referring to Serbia, then you also clearly have no clue about what you are talking about. It didn't "fall down" it was shot-down by enemy fire because of extreme Serbian luck. The RADAR used was totally unable to detect the F-117 until the bomb-bay doors were opened. It was then fired upon by a missile guided by the 'anti-stealth' Soviet Radar set.

  • @ATBatmanMALS31
    @ATBatmanMALS31 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Woblin' Goblin," bad video, would not recommend.

  • @yannalaplageable
    @yannalaplageable 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    no subs please

  • @PatHaskell
    @PatHaskell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AI videos are horrible

  • @svenkateswararao9516
    @svenkateswararao9516 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First view