I decided to compare it with the Hollyland Lark M2 instead of the full-size DJI mic because that's more of a direct competitor. Sorry, it got so long. I tried to make it 10 minutes.
1. You are not an idiot. 2. Bluetooth audio with the pixel and n/c on worked real nice. Didn't hear the motorcycle. Thanks for the work. Happy New Year.
@@bikeny I thought the Bluetooth was going to sound much worse than it actually did. I think the first time I connected it, obviously there was a connection problem. It didn't sound like that for the next recording.
I bought the Holly Land Lark M2's when the first came out and no one knew about them yet and I've used them extensively and they've never failed to perform. The biggest cons that I can see with the DJI set are the fact that they are clip first, then magnet second and their shape. Explaining what I mean about clip first, then magnet second, I use the Lark M2's exclusively with the magnet, be it magnetizing it to their clothing or on the lanyard. I've NEVER used the clip, The M2 will sit flush against the surface of any clothing since there's no clip to cause a gap between the clothing and the mic like it does with the DJI set. This allows it to be a little bit less conspicuous and less likely to droop down. Secondly, the round shape of the M2's make them naturally appearing. Humans are used to seeing round objects on clothing like buttons or jewelry, but they aren't used to seeing square objects on clothing. It'll stick out to the viewer and to people interacting with your subjects. Don't get me wrong, I wanted the DJI set to be awesome cause I'm a DJI guy. I own 2 DJI Gimbals and 3 DJI drones. I just don't think they improved anything over the Holly Lands (unless you have the Osmo) while having a couple huge cons against them in my book.
I decided to compare it with the Hollyland Lark M2 instead of the full-size DJI mic because that's more of a direct competitor. Sorry, it got so long. I tried to make it 10 minutes.
1. You are not an idiot.
2. Bluetooth audio with the pixel and n/c on worked real nice. Didn't hear the motorcycle.
Thanks for the work. Happy New Year.
@@bikeny I thought the Bluetooth was going to sound much worse than it actually did. I think the first time I connected it, obviously there was a connection problem. It didn't sound like that for the next recording.
I bought the Holly Land Lark M2's when the first came out and no one knew about them yet and I've used them extensively and they've never failed to perform. The biggest cons that I can see with the DJI set are the fact that they are clip first, then magnet second and their shape. Explaining what I mean about clip first, then magnet second, I use the Lark M2's exclusively with the magnet, be it magnetizing it to their clothing or on the lanyard. I've NEVER used the clip, The M2 will sit flush against the surface of any clothing since there's no clip to cause a gap between the clothing and the mic like it does with the DJI set. This allows it to be a little bit less conspicuous and less likely to droop down. Secondly, the round shape of the M2's make them naturally appearing. Humans are used to seeing round objects on clothing like buttons or jewelry, but they aren't used to seeing square objects on clothing. It'll stick out to the viewer and to people interacting with your subjects.
Don't get me wrong, I wanted the DJI set to be awesome cause I'm a DJI guy. I own 2 DJI Gimbals and 3 DJI drones. I just don't think they improved anything over the Holly Lands (unless you have the Osmo) while having a couple huge cons against them in my book.
hi, i am also a dji fan lol, why i think the mini clip is fine in using. really personal aha