Lmao 😂. I mean if it makes u feel better I pick ur team for nhl 20 franchise mode and do pretty well so you can join me in pretending the wild are good. :D After trading away all of your above 30 year old players with bad contracts and almost the whole ahl roster. but don’t worry you guys will win the cup soon :)
@@TheTruMan196 From what I've read because the goalie tried to cover it outside of his crease if they blew the whistle it would have been delay of game, so he wasn't allowed to cover the puck so there was no frozen puck which means that it was a forced turnover by the bruins. either way it doesn't matter because on the next play the hurricanes scored a SH to tie it so the goal meant nothing
I was honestly so confused, when I was watching the game everyone was focusing on a possible hand pass but like, Mrazek had his whole glove over the puck?? But then we immediately gave up a shorthanded goal so I guess that was karma
You want to see something, they already wrote the check for the fine (the owner covered it) and it was for $25,017 (The extra 17 was Rod's number when he won the cup with Carolina in 2006)
@@jameskribs2258 B's fan here. I agree that should have been no goal, no questions. The shorty was the universe giving some karma. There's been bad calls both ways and it sucks ( that goes for the whole league sadly). I don't like to win or lose from bad calls. But that extra $17 bucks is fantastic. Hope we get some more consistent calls (there wont be) so the better team that shows up actually gets the W.
Alright Dangle, my Wild didn't screw your Leafs. The ball would have found a way to screw itself out of the pick just like your team does every year in the playoffs (and now the qualifying round). With that said, I still enjoy watching your content, keep up the good work.
@@moneydynamicmatanya9541 It's a figure of speech, have you ever heard of it? Also it's "Your" not "You're" (You are) because that doesn't make sense grammatically. If YOU'RE going to talk smack, atleast have the know-how to do so.
The league cares about original 6 teams more than any other team in the NHL. They never wanted the canes to beat the caps in round 1 last year, so your right but this series is rigged against the canes #sadface
@@michaeloconnor5904 the difference between the wild and the leafs is that the leafs have no excuse to be first round knockouts, they have so many good players. Meanwhile the Wild have freakin MATS ZUCCARELLO SIGNED FOR 5 YEARS AT 6 MILLION, WITH AN NMC. Not to mention Rask, or Dubnyk, or Parise, or Staal.
"If the Flyers aren't your Cup favorites I want to know why." - Steve Dangle, August 12th Hat Picks Video (Korpisalo's 85 saves) Gm 2: Montreal 5, Philadelphia 0
Boston fan here... when I saw that call I just sort of made this face 😲😳🤔 caaaaause no way that was a goal. All I can do I shrug guiltily and say “uhmm well I’ll take it?”
Let's be honest here mrazek covered the puck and instead of looking to see if any other bruins players are in the area of play he non-chalantly throws the puck back into play and the puck lands on coyle's stick and coyle puts the puck in the net mrazek basically just gave a freebie
@@mikebarber12 Yeah, he non-chalantly threw the puck back into play with the added assistance of not one but TWO Bruins sticks pushing on it. And not to put too fine a point on it, but this is CLEARLY defined as interference with the goalkeeper in rule 69.1: "Goals should be disallowed if...(2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, _provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact_ * ....For purposes of this rule, “contact,” whether incidental or otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or any part of the body." *Those Bruins were not trying to avoid contact, they were pushing on that glove with their sticks like their lives depended on it. So even if you want to say that Mrazek was out of his crease at this point in time (he really wasn't...he was mostly IN the crease when he covered the puck), the contact was illegal. This was a mistake, and the NHL should own up to it. Who do they think they're fooling with this crap? The fans have known for DECADES that referees frequently F up, but it's a REALLY rare occasion (I think I've seen it twice in my life) when the NHL actually admits it.
@@VoIcanoman That stick (yeah, I only saw one) barely pushed his glove, and wouldn't cause him to flip it back like he did. Also, interference is never called for poking at the puck before the whistle.
I saw a second price incident in goal where he threatened to hit the other player, for his own man pushing dude into price. He actually does this often when it wasn't anywhere near the other teams fault.
can we include in the tampa columbus game when alexandre texier was charged with a high sticking penalty but replay shows a tampa player HIGH STICKED HIS OWN TEAMMATE AND THEY PINNED IT ON TEXIER WHO WAS MILES AWAY FROM IT
Gotta love how Rod da Bod, as he is known in Caniac land, stands up the the NHL zeebras!! I love how the owner paid the fine of not just $25,000, but added on a an addtional $17 to make it $25,017. Oh and by the way #17 was Rod's number as a player. What a classy way to stick it to the establishment. Best $25,017 ever spent from a team perspective!!!
I am absolutely dumbfounded, flabbergasted and stunned that the entire Leafs game 5 performance (especially the JT wide-empty net miss) wasn’t included, as that was the finest example of a dang-it in the NHL’s history. However, I am glad that the draft lottery incident was mentioned, as I was more distraught over that than the end result of the CBJ/TOR series.
We should petition for Steve Dangle to be the official play caller for the NHL. They give him the rule book each year, make sure he understands it all, and then they just send him the review vids live, to be called. He'll be the Gordon Ramsey of hockey.
I would have thought the puck going off of korpi's foot and into the goal would have been the dang it because A) It tied the game which sent it into loads of overtimes B) It delayed the game that followed to the next morning C) Fans of both teams had to stay up late to see the end of the afternoon game D) A dang-it to the previous record holders for saves in a game, shots against in a game, and maybe other stats like TOI E) Also that non-call for tripping Atkinson
Not a flyers fan but I've been saying watch out for Philly for two years now. At the time they had their vets, then Hart and seeing their prospect pool. I have said the same about the rangers as of late. I see those two teams as the future powerhouses of the east. Even the canes. Of course you will always have Tampa and Boston.
Just speaking out of my ass here, but isn't it unfair that a team can take a penalty at the end of the 3rd and dump the puck with freedom of the icing call when winning? Imagine it, you're down one point, you get an extra attacker out there, but now that you're on a power play the other 4 players can constantly shoot at the empty net from anywhere on the ice... it's a boon for a penalty... that shouldn't happen... they should call the Icings if a penalty lasts until the end of the third (for the winning team only) either that or they should give extended time in the third period to the losing team if the winning team has a penalty that lasts longer than the time remaining.
Maybe it's the goalie in me who has had a similar experience, but here's my take (because I'm sooo important lmao): good goal, even though it's not fair. Let me explain: I don't actually see Ritchie touch the puck, but even if he does, Mrazek has his glove over the puck for maybe a second, so it's not a hand pass. It is not goalie interference because Bjork is going for the puck, and I understand that the play wasn't blown dead because, as I said, Mrazek has his glove over the puck for maybe a second, probably less. Should it be blown dead as soon as the goalie has it? I think so, but the refs didn't have a quick whistle and players don't stop playing until the whistle blows. It really sucks for Mrazek and even as a Bruins fan I feel for him, but it is a goal.
I don't see this as a not a quick enough whistle, as we've seen over the years the "intent to blow the whistle". The refs in my opinion flat out missed him having his glove on the puck until the review and its literally the NHL way to make an excuse instead of just admitting that it was a missed call especially since they say the goalie had control (covered in this case) then, it literally should've been a no goal. I don't care about either team in this series but thats just my take on it.
@@huevoosranchero I think having control meant he played the puck, in this case. He barely covered it for a split second and flipped it behind him. Not enough for a stoppage.
To me its unbelievable that when there is a loose blade in the ice they dont blow the whistle to stop game. Like yeah just leave this incredibly sharp metal object laying down in there when guys are just flying past it. Sure. Thats safe im sure.
Have to say, after Game 2 of the Bruins-Carolina match-up, when the 3rd goal is waved off for goalie interference, I was surprised Rod wasn't on the phone with his bank asking for more checks and his current balance.
I’m watching the Canes-Bruins series. The calls are completely one sided. I don’t even want to talk about about the hit Chara had on Svech that might have taken him out for next season
So, I just want to understand, when Tuukka Rask’s skateblade came off awhile ago, he tried to tell the refs he couldn’t play fairly. Tampa Bay scored a goal because Rask couldn’t move to the shot. Rask was told the play doesn’t stop for a skateblade coming off. But, it happened with Lehner and they stopped the play for him. Is there some rule difference I don’t know?
I didn't see the Lehner play, but it is a possession call if the opponent has possession play continues. I'm surprised Tuukka didn't throw his mask off he seems to do that when he gets in trouble
The refs blew that call against the canes and then there was another blown in the 1st game of the Vegas series. Vegas was clearly offsides and they didn't call it back after review
It’s because you can’t rewiew 2 things. Brind’Amour had to choose between goalie interference or hand pass and as you saw he challenged hand pass while he should’ve goalie interference so following the NHL rules should it be a goal: yes , but if Brind’Amour would’ve chose goalie interference it probably would’ve been no goal,
But the biggest gripe Brind'Amour had is that the ref flat out refused to tell him what the call on the ice was. So he had to take a guess at which one to challenge
Grew up a B's fan - wife is from Raleigh so I've become an adopted Canes fan. Let me say this: refs are absolutely calling this in favor of the Bruins. Garbage officiating.
Specially when the ref watched it straigh up and then pointed at Stall to get off the ice for the helmet rule. th-cam.com/video/1IHGX2e0l0k/w-d-xo.html
Flames game right now - am I the only one who finds it odd that accidentally lifting a puck over the boards is a 2min delay of game, but buddy smashing a piece of glass with his stick out of frustration and actually delaying the game is not?
Gotta say...I ref youth hockey.....Id literally be assaulted in the lobby if I made a call like that. Goes up to the coach like “what’s your call” . excuse me?
I love how when coaches tell the truth the league is just like "yeah well your truth makes us look bad so pay up" torts told the truth for that chicago game and rod told the truth about that game. If the official is telling the coach to choose then why the fuck is he an official. Theres no way that should be a goal and the worst part is when the official announced it he sounded like he wasnt even sure and just gave carolina a bench penalty out of panic
MY DREAM... IS TO HAVE WHITE PEOPLE PROBLEMS!!! Then I Can Stop Worrying About Real World ISSUES! ...... No Offense To This Guy, Still Love His Commentating. Canada NEEDS A New Don Cherry!!!
Ight So lemme tell you what's up You can only challenge 1 ruling on a play Brind'Amour tried challenging both You can't do that He challenged for a hand pass Noted, Ritchie did commit a hand pass, but MRAZEK TOUCHED IT NEXT, thereby negating the hand pass Mrazek froze the puck, that should have been blown dead You get 1 hate point for being right, you can redeem this at any Bruins Fan Store near you (only at participating locations) However Brind'Amour challenged for a hand pass There was no hand pass Therefore it's a good goal after review.
As a Canes fan, I'm not mad about games one or two in the CAR/BOS series. Both coach's challenges were absolute garbage, but the Canes scored shorthanded on the penalty for DoG, cancelling out the awarded goal, and they won game two. Yes, I wish the refs were better, but I'm not mad at this exact moment. Tom Dundon, the Canes owner, paid Rod's entire $25k fine. The final check came to $25,017, the extra $17 is because Rod's old number (that's hanging from the ceiling at PNC Arena in Raleigh) was 17. This shows that Dundon has Rod's back (which is a good thing to do when he's right).
Yikes, Steve. As a Wild fan, don't try and tell me that they don't contribute anything... 1) They bolster my local liquor store's Powers whiskey sales 2) They always finish near the upper middle and vault whomever plays them in the first round of the playoffs a pretty easy road ahead. 3) They provide one of the most welcoming and luxurious arenas for visiting fans. 4) They consistently break the hearts of the Avalanche faithful/arrogant. 5) They're never bad enough to snag a top-flight talent in the draft. 6) Last but not least, in 2012 they taught the rest of the league the perils of front-loading so much of the salary cap into a small number of its "stars." That move completely hamstrung the team for nearly a decade and they may never climb out of the doldrums until those guys retire. Well, they taught every team except the Maple Leafs, it seems. So, I guess maybe their latest contribution is to keep the Leafs' cupless streak alive and save Lafrenier from being grossly underutilized in the talent-bomb that is Toronto. Jokes and jabs aside, I love your show more than most and look forward to Hat Picks and Dang-its every week. Thanks for all you do, congrats on the healthy baby, and I wish you nothing but the best. Cheers from just south of the border!
I have to disagree...I don't think he had it covered long enough to be considered a frozen puck. He touched it, which makes the hand-pass null. It was knocked out from under his glove (which, a frozen puck by the goalie is not reviewable) and put into the goal. The players are taught to play-til-the-whistle...that's what they did. It is close, but it looks like a goal to me. Now, with that said...I have to say that the ref not telling coach what the call on the ice was is ridiculous. And I wish that like the NFL, all aspects (ALL ASPECTS) were reviewable. Then they could rule that this was covered (even though I don't think it was). But at least if freezing the puck was reviewable at all, they COULD say that he had it covered, or that the ref lost sight of the puck, or whatever.
Here's what I don't understand about the 2nd lottery...why were the teams placed in THAT order? If each ball has same weight and size...I would imagine it would have made more sense to place them in order of standings...if they did that...Florida's ball would have been in the place where the Rangers ball was...also, if they gave the pick to the Qualifying Team E...the team that did technically win the lottery...that would have ALSO been Florida...I'd be pissed if I was a Florida fan.
Mrazek didn’t even cover the puck for a second. Refs don’t immediately blow the play dead, especially when the goaltender leaps out of the crease to try and make a save. Now. Should there have been GI? No. Bjork technically had possession of the puck even after Mrazek slammed his glove on Bjork’s stick/puck. Should this have been a hand pass? No. The puck bounced off of the Carolina defender. It’s as simple as that. Now, if the call on the ice were to be reversed from good goal, the game still would’ve been tied. Carolina wouldn’t have scored that shorty since they wouldn’t have been assessed a minor for the failed challenge. Boston still would’ve won.
good. Toronto doenst deserve the 1st overall pick. neither did ANY of the other teams that were "eligible"...why NHL has a lottery is beyond me. 31st, picks 1st, 1st picks 31st. its that simple. EVERY other sport understands that, NHL is that red headed step child nobody understands.
A few things on the league There is no conspiracy...the Leafs have won a top pick. They have him on their team and he's good. The Rangers haven't ever won one. They did now. Sorry the Leafs only have one top pick in the last few years. That's a rough rough go. Oh except they signed a second top pick from the Islanders. And yes he's on the team now. So that's two top picks. They still lost. And guess what... I'm positive the Leafs fans were giddy to join in on those 1940 chants before the Rangers won for the first time in 54 freaking years. And guess what! The Leafs are thiiiiiiis close to that 54 year mark. And they better win next year or else man they will probably go longer than 54. So when do we start those chants around the league? Yes the Rangers got their first top pick. And it was sweet. Still is actually.... and officials... This all started long ago when the league decided to adjust penalties to "open up the game and reduce interference and hooking etc.." It took the refs 3 years to understand what hooking is and still get it twisted because hooking is now "holding a stick horizontal to the ice". And cross checking effectively became legal. Because I guess that doesn't slow up the game. Then video replay. All of these things are trying to perfect what ain't all that broken. And it leads to this kind of thing. Or things like offsides replays that bring back goals when the offsides wasn't relevant to the play. Etc... Brindamour schooled David Quinn and now the league. And he's dead on. Lgr
Hi Steve, I just watched a highlight Dang-It you will no doubt have on your next dang it video. The Chicago goal scored off of the goalies head! That's a huge Dang-It! Love all of your videos and your channel. I'm a Flyers fan but my daughter loves the Leafs, all because I got her a Leafs zamboni out of a claw machine when I took her to a movie when she was younger. Lol! Stay safe.
The irony of Toronto getting knocked out of the playoffs by Columbus, and then losing the #1 pick because the Wild's ball knocks them out of the way....Both teams joined the league in 2000...
I don't see what was wrong with the call on the Boston goal. A Boston players touched the puck with his glove, then Mrazek covered it, but immediately flipped it backwards. so, he didn't cover it long enough for a stoppage, and negated the hand pass from the Boston player gloving it by playing it. What am I missing?
Coyle's "goal" was an absolutely pathetic call. The NHL and their officials showed their ineptitude. 2 solid reasons to waive it off but somehow they added -1 and -1 and ended up with +1. Absolute idiocy no matter how you look at it.
What a Leaf's fan, Montreal wins 5 - 0 and you're still finding ways to trash on us, "you're gonna have to rely on Carey Price" hey y'know there's more people than Carey Price, it seems like everyone likes to disrespect everyone on the canadiens but Price, I know its a dang it that moment but the comments after that like, dude, don't you have some leaf's golfing skills to praise right now
Dip into this now and again...never have been interested in botched plays. I think the basic psychology behind those who find this amusing or entertaining is jealousy / inferiority / insecurity. Guy slips on banana peel: I laugh -- it didn't happen to me, which reminds me that there are other, stupider more generally embarrassed people in the world, which is comforting.This is schadenfreude - gladness to not the be person being laughed at. At the root of schadenfreude is dehumanization. The definition of dehumanization: Dehumanization is the process of perceiving a person or social group as lacking the attributes that define what it means to be human. I already been pretty aware of these connections, which always made me both wonder and get angry when I see people not only express schadenfreude, but do so without any doubt it might be immoral.
The only thing better would've been if it was Bostons or the Canadiens ball that knocked it out of the way. Also how is 4 players taking over 40 million of your cap and getting shutout in an elimination game, not a Dangit. Steve Dangle needs to rant on himself like he did with the refs. He make and change the rules every year, and you can't enforce your own rules. NJ Devils fans need to rise up!
Sorry Steve, but if the Leafs can't win a playoff series with Matthews and Tavares, I don't think Lafreniere will help. Also you're gonna have to relax, the Wild organization didn't do anything to make the ping pong balls bounce around strangely, and we haven't done anything to anyone in as long as I can remember. Channel all of that anger from the draft lottery and yell at the refs some more next week, then we'll all be cool again.
omg...I only recently started watching your videos but I so sorry if someone already said it or people say it all the time but I can't be the first to notice that you look just like Andrew Scheer??? XD
I would say for the Carolina dang it: The ref's call was good goal so it should not be up to the ref to tell the coach what to challenge. Of course the fact that after the review the ref basically comes on the mic and says (I paraphrase) "There was no goal because the goalie covered the puck but because you challenged the wrong thing the call on the ice, which was wrong, stands and you get two minutes for delay of game." is absolutely ridiculous.
The Leafs didn’t deserve the first overall pick. The Pens didn’t deserve it either. The Rangers and the Wild were far more deserving. The Leafs have two first overall picks that are overpaid and don’t contribute for how much they make.
I say that the Minnesota Wild were about to rise to claim their very first 1st over-all in franchise history, and the Leafs ball got in the way! Why didn't you just step aside and let our ball through, Dangle!
I missed you Mr. Dangit Dangle. I love hockey. I hope everyone is ok and if you’re reading this that means you have an iPhone or computer so your life could be worse. Have nice day.
If the Leafs had won every other team, every other team's fans would have spazzed. With the Rangers winning, most of us went. eh, at least it was TO, Oilers or Pens.
The ref even said that that Mrazek had control of the puck. Well then wouldn't it be goalie interference because a Bruins player knocked it out? The refs were garbage that game.
Ok wait... so they ruled that the goaltender froze the puck, overruling the hand pass... ok that's fine, but if he had it frozen, why was it then not a stoppage of play for the goaltender having it frozen?
I was hoping to see the Canucks lighting up the former champs, who have not scored a 3rd period goal, also do you think murray just lost his job? Is Jarry now the starter
It's bad that they get fined cuz the refs get there feeling hurt. that was no goal in any decade like the 80's the 90's 2000's and so on. The refs need to know the rules of there own game they are reffing. The boston dude hit the puck out of the goalie's hand and it is clear as day.
That Canes incident was a joke. They challenge for a hand pass and not get the call when they could have, perhaps should have gone with goalie interference instead but when the ref himself says that the goalie had frozen the puck, then he's frozen the puck, play should be dead, either way that should have been a no goal.
Will the next dang its video have the officiating of game 2 of the Boston Carolina series? They came out and proved Rod Brind'amour right by being garbage
Why aren't the refs allowed to change/correct their call after given more information. Isn't that the point of more technology, to get the call RIGHT, not to challenge an uninformed call?
always love seeing these in my sub box, easily best series on sportsnet.
Glad you enjoy it!
i agree
Ottawa should more upset because we two chances, what you complaining about
Corey Hill no ones upset headass
@@sportsnet I
"The Minnesota Wild contribute nothing to anybody" false, the Minnesota Wild contribute a lot to my alcohol consumption
As do all Minnesota teams
PREACH!
Lmao 😂. I mean if it makes u feel better I pick ur team for nhl 20 franchise mode and do pretty well so you can join me in pretending the wild are good. :D
After trading away all of your above 30 year old players with bad contracts and almost the whole ahl roster. but don’t worry you guys will win the cup soon :)
Same here my drinking and depression is because of them and how awful they are
The Minnesota Wild contribute to other teams making it to the second round
Can we have a dang it on EA sports who predicted a Penguins v Oilers final?
They simulated it with nhl 20, didn’t predict it
'The goalie had possession of the puck, no hand pass. Therefore we have a good goal'.
What the F***?!
I can't even comprehend the backwards logic the referees used to justify that.
It was retarded. Its like if he had possession then the plays dead lol cause he covered it.
@@TheTruMan196 From what I've read because the goalie tried to cover it outside of his crease if they blew the whistle it would have been delay of game, so he wasn't allowed to cover the puck so there was no frozen puck which means that it was a forced turnover by the bruins. either way it doesn't matter because on the next play the hurricanes scored a SH to tie it so the goal meant nothing
I was honestly so confused, when I was watching the game everyone was focusing on a possible hand pass but like, Mrazek had his whole glove over the puck?? But then we immediately gave up a shorthanded goal so I guess that was karma
It makes complete sense if you don’t think about it
How in the hell did the Bruins get a goal AND a powerplay from that... WHAT
At least the canes scored Short-handed on the in suing PK
If a team fails a challenge they get 2min delay of game penalty (except on goalie interference challenge i think)
You want to see something, they already wrote the check for the fine (the owner covered it) and it was for $25,017 (The extra 17 was Rod's number when he won the cup with Carolina in 2006)
@@jameskribs2258 B's fan here. I agree that should have been no goal, no questions. The shorty was the universe giving some karma. There's been bad calls both ways and it sucks ( that goes for the whole league sadly). I don't like to win or lose from bad calls. But that extra $17 bucks is fantastic. Hope we get some more consistent calls (there wont be) so the better team that shows up actually gets the W.
@@thursdaythrice You should probably say "More consistently *good* calls" because the calls can be consistently *awful* as well.
“The Canadiens are gonna have a tough time against the Flyers”
Habs: win 5-0
The classic Dangle jinx... or... reverse jinx? 🤔
😂😂
So true
This comment hurts after game 3
And hasn't scored since
As a wild fan this is the best thing they have ever done in there 20 year existence
Well the part about the canadiens didn’t age too well, here after the 5-0 win for the Habs. Go Habs go!!!
@SumOfIt steve said the habs were gonna have hard time, and they won 5-0. That's what he means ;)
Go habs
The lehner dangit is more that they couldn't score than the fact that he lost his blade twice
It's definitely not a dang it when Price didn't follow through with the punch, punching with a blocker can be a suspension if extreme enough
Alright Dangle, my Wild didn't screw your Leafs. The ball would have found a way to screw itself out of the pick just like your team does every year in the playoffs (and now the qualifying round). With that said, I still enjoy watching your content, keep up the good work.
Celtic Slayer93 You're Wild?? I didn't know YOU own the team now! Lmao!!
@@moneydynamicmatanya9541 It's a figure of speech, have you ever heard of it? Also it's "Your" not "You're" (You are) because that doesn't make sense grammatically. If YOU'RE going to talk smack, atleast have the know-how to do so.
i donno the wild are definitely a hat pick for saving the league from the leafs getting lafrieniere
Nah it’s the leafs they would still suck
@@nuj2187 True, look at Edmonton
@@nuj2187 Exactly.
Arturi Lehkonen - The Disconnected Controller
😂😂😂
If Lehkonen scored 10% of his chances I’m pretty sure he could win the hart
Someone voodo this guy.. He's soo unlucky.. I know it has to do with the talent too but damn
We can add like 3 more from the canes vs bruins game 2
Hot damn
The league cares about original 6 teams more than any other team in the NHL. They never wanted the canes to beat the caps in round 1 last year, so your right but this series is rigged against the canes #sadface
It’s not a Steve DangIts video without the Leafs😂😂😂
I think the Wild have just as much right to be mad at Toronto for that, lol
Yeah, those damned Maple Leafs blocked our ball from going up and getting us the #1 pick.... THEN THE RANGERS STOLE THE PRECIOUS!!!
WHAT WOULD YOUUU HAVE DONE WITH IT?!? GET KNOCKED OUT IN THE FIRST ROUND EVERY YEA-wait. Huh, never considered how similar we are.
@@michaeloconnor5904 the difference between the wild and the leafs is that the leafs have no excuse to be first round knockouts, they have so many good players. Meanwhile the Wild have freakin MATS ZUCCARELLO SIGNED FOR 5 YEARS AT 6 MILLION, WITH AN NMC.
Not to mention Rask, or Dubnyk, or Parise, or Staal.
"If the Flyers aren't your Cup favorites I want to know why." - Steve Dangle, August 12th Hat Picks Video (Korpisalo's 85 saves)
Gm 2: Montreal 5, Philadelphia 0
I feel bad for his son during the rant
He had to soundproof the room he films in
The room is soundproofed so he can yell and scream as loud and as much as he wants
Rarely do we see a 2-on-0 become a 2-on-whoops. 😂😂
Think about if the blues botched their 3 on 0
Lol Johnathan you made my day🤣🤣
Boston fan here... when I saw that call I just sort of made this face 😲😳🤔 caaaaause no way that was a goal. All I can do I shrug guiltily and say “uhmm well I’ll take it?”
Let's be honest here mrazek covered the puck and instead of looking to see if any other bruins players are in the area of play he non-chalantly throws the puck back into play and the puck lands on coyle's stick and coyle puts the puck in the net mrazek basically just gave a freebie
@@mikebarber12 Yeah, he non-chalantly threw the puck back into play with the added assistance of not one but TWO Bruins sticks pushing on it. And not to put too fine a point on it, but this is CLEARLY defined as interference with the goalkeeper in rule 69.1: "Goals should be disallowed if...(2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, _provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact_ * ....For purposes of this rule, “contact,” whether incidental or otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or any part of the body."
*Those Bruins were not trying to avoid contact, they were pushing on that glove with their sticks like their lives depended on it. So even if you want to say that Mrazek was out of his crease at this point in time (he really wasn't...he was mostly IN the crease when he covered the puck), the contact was illegal. This was a mistake, and the NHL should own up to it. Who do they think they're fooling with this crap? The fans have known for DECADES that referees frequently F up, but it's a REALLY rare occasion (I think I've seen it twice in my life) when the NHL actually admits it.
@@VoIcanoman That stick (yeah, I only saw one) barely pushed his glove, and wouldn't cause him to flip it back like he did. Also, interference is never called for poking at the puck before the whistle.
Game 2 Canes vs Bruins will need to be a dang it as well for the refs and the league. It's out of hand!
Welp, Steve is fired up again.
100% Price should have been yelling at his own dman, not the Flyers player.
I saw a second price incident in goal where he threatened to hit the other player, for his own man pushing dude into price. He actually does this often when it wasn't anywhere near the other teams fault.
Wait hold up... there should’ve been a whistle with a frozen puck AND a hand pass and it still counted? So which is a whistle and which isn’t?
can we include in the tampa columbus game when alexandre texier was charged with a high sticking penalty but replay shows a tampa player HIGH STICKED HIS OWN TEAMMATE AND THEY PINNED IT ON TEXIER WHO WAS MILES AWAY FROM IT
Jackets still get no respect
If we got rid of video review the nhl would be a better place
Gotta love how Rod da Bod, as he is known in Caniac land, stands up the the NHL zeebras!! I love how the owner paid the fine of not just $25,000, but added on a an addtional $17 to make it $25,017. Oh and by the way #17 was Rod's number as a player. What a classy way to stick it to the establishment. Best $25,017 ever spent from a team perspective!!!
I am absolutely dumbfounded, flabbergasted and stunned that the entire Leafs game 5 performance (especially the JT wide-empty net miss) wasn’t included, as that was the finest example of a dang-it in the NHL’s history. However, I am glad that the draft lottery incident was mentioned, as I was more distraught over that than the end result of the CBJ/TOR series.
I like to personally thank the wild from preventing a super team even though the Leafs would probably find a way to mess that up too
We should petition for Steve Dangle to be the official play caller for the NHL. They give him the rule book each year, make sure he understands it all, and then they just send him the review vids live, to be called. He'll be the Gordon Ramsey of hockey.
I would have thought the puck going off of korpi's foot and into the goal would have been the dang it because
A) It tied the game which sent it into loads of overtimes
B) It delayed the game that followed to the next morning
C) Fans of both teams had to stay up late to see the end of the afternoon game
D) A dang-it to the previous record holders for saves in a game, shots against in a game, and maybe other stats like TOI
E) Also that non-call for tripping Atkinson
Not a flyers fan but I've been saying watch out for Philly for two years now. At the time they had their vets, then Hart and seeing their prospect pool. I have said the same about the rangers as of late. I see those two teams as the future powerhouses of the east. Even the canes. Of course you will always have Tampa and Boston.
Just speaking out of my ass here, but isn't it unfair that a team can take a penalty at the end of the 3rd and dump the puck with freedom of the icing call when winning? Imagine it, you're down one point, you get an extra attacker out there, but now that you're on a power play the other 4 players can constantly shoot at the empty net from anywhere on the ice... it's a boon for a penalty... that shouldn't happen... they should call the Icings if a penalty lasts until the end of the third (for the winning team only) either that or they should give extended time in the third period to the losing team if the winning team has a penalty that lasts longer than the time remaining.
Maybe it's the goalie in me who has had a similar experience, but here's my take (because I'm sooo important lmao): good goal, even though it's not fair.
Let me explain: I don't actually see Ritchie touch the puck, but even if he does, Mrazek has his glove over the puck for maybe a second, so it's not a hand pass. It is not goalie interference because Bjork is going for the puck, and I understand that the play wasn't blown dead because, as I said, Mrazek has his glove over the puck for maybe a second, probably less. Should it be blown dead as soon as the goalie has it? I think so, but the refs didn't have a quick whistle and players don't stop playing until the whistle blows.
It really sucks for Mrazek and even as a Bruins fan I feel for him, but it is a goal.
I don't see this as a not a quick enough whistle, as we've seen over the years the "intent to blow the whistle". The refs in my opinion flat out missed him having his glove on the puck until the review and its literally the NHL way to make an excuse instead of just admitting that it was a missed call especially since they say the goalie had control (covered in this case) then, it literally should've been a no goal. I don't care about either team in this series but thats just my take on it.
@@huevoosranchero I think having control meant he played the puck, in this case. He barely covered it for a split second and flipped it behind him. Not enough for a stoppage.
To me its unbelievable that when there is a loose blade in the ice they dont blow the whistle to stop game. Like yeah just leave this incredibly sharp metal object laying down in there when guys are just flying past it. Sure. Thats safe im sure.
The hand pass goal in the Carolina game all blues fans can relate to “been there done that” lol
"THE MINNESOTA WILD CONTRIBUTE NOTHING TO ANYBODY!"
Truer words were never spoken.
"Habs gonna need Price"
Next game: *Habs win 5-0*
And the habs haven't been able to score since with Hart doing better than Price. 😂
Habs is my team. I COULD NOT BELIEVE we wasted a 2 on 0 in such a tight game -__-
Doesn’t surprise me from Lekhonen. Went to a game last season where he had a penalty shot and he didn’t even try to score.
GG Price played so good against the Pens id love to see them beat Philly too
Have to say, after Game 2 of the Bruins-Carolina match-up, when the 3rd goal is waved off for goalie interference, I was surprised Rod wasn't on the phone with his bank asking for more checks and his current balance.
Justice was done though...'Canes tied the series.
I’m watching the Canes-Bruins series. The calls are completely one sided. I don’t even want to talk about about the hit Chara had on Svech that might have taken him out for next season
Chars didn’t do anything, he turned around to get svech’s stock off of him and punched him down. How was that intentional?
So, I just want to understand, when Tuukka Rask’s skateblade came off awhile ago, he tried to tell the refs he couldn’t play fairly. Tampa Bay scored a goal because Rask couldn’t move to the shot. Rask was told the play doesn’t stop for a skateblade coming off. But, it happened with Lehner and they stopped the play for him. Is there some rule difference I don’t know?
I didn't see the Lehner play, but it is a possession call if the opponent has possession play continues. I'm surprised Tuukka didn't throw his mask off he seems to do that when he gets in trouble
The refs blew that call against the canes and then there was another blown in the 1st game of the Vegas series. Vegas was clearly offsides and they didn't call it back after review
Steve, I didn't listen when you told me to not look up the conspiracy theories about Kawhi's buzzer beater.
I wish I did.
I’m honestly extremely relieved that JR is seriously pissed at how the Penguins season ended. Expecting and demanding results is never a bad thing.
The only thing worse than the bruins are their fans.
It’s because you can’t rewiew 2 things. Brind’Amour had to choose between goalie interference or hand pass and as you saw he challenged hand pass while he should’ve goalie interference so following the NHL rules should it be a goal: yes , but if Brind’Amour would’ve chose goalie interference it probably would’ve been no goal,
But the biggest gripe Brind'Amour had is that the ref flat out refused to tell him what the call on the ice was. So he had to take a guess at which one to challenge
Grew up a B's fan - wife is from Raleigh so I've become an adopted Canes fan. Let me say this: refs are absolutely calling this in favor of the Bruins. Garbage officiating.
I love when Steve goes absolutely insane while taking about the Bruins 😆
Its karma for the Hawks for trading Lehner
Can’t wait for next week’s dang-it, where the Staal incident is discussed
Specially when the ref watched it straigh up and then pointed at Stall to get off the ice for the helmet rule. th-cam.com/video/1IHGX2e0l0k/w-d-xo.html
Flames game right now - am I the only one who finds it odd that accidentally lifting a puck over the boards is a 2min delay of game, but buddy smashing a piece of glass with his stick out of frustration and actually delaying the game is not?
Gotta say...I ref youth hockey.....Id literally be assaulted in the lobby if I made a call like that. Goes up to the coach like “what’s your call” . excuse me?
I love how when coaches tell the truth the league is just like "yeah well your truth makes us look bad so pay up" torts told the truth for that chicago game and rod told the truth about that game. If the official is telling the coach to choose then why the fuck is he an official. Theres no way that should be a goal and the worst part is when the official announced it he sounded like he wasnt even sure and just gave carolina a bench penalty out of panic
You need to do the Patrick Roy trade tree
At least im not the only mad person today 😅😂
A Dang-it without the Maple Leafs, you don’t see that often
The leafs need a 40 year old zambonie driver in net!! Lollll
Did you miss the end?
MY DREAM... IS TO HAVE WHITE PEOPLE PROBLEMS!!! Then I Can Stop Worrying About Real World ISSUES! ...... No Offense To This Guy, Still Love His Commentating. Canada NEEDS A New Don Cherry!!!
Ight
So lemme tell you what's up
You can only challenge 1 ruling on a play
Brind'Amour tried challenging both
You can't do that
He challenged for a hand pass
Noted, Ritchie did commit a hand pass, but MRAZEK TOUCHED IT NEXT, thereby negating the hand pass
Mrazek froze the puck, that should have been blown dead
You get 1 hate point for being right, you can redeem this at any Bruins Fan Store near you (only at participating locations)
However
Brind'Amour challenged for a hand pass
There was no hand pass
Therefore it's a good goal after review.
As a Canes fan, I'm not mad about games one or two in the CAR/BOS series. Both coach's challenges were absolute garbage, but the Canes scored shorthanded on the penalty for DoG, cancelling out the awarded goal, and they won game two.
Yes, I wish the refs were better, but I'm not mad at this exact moment.
Tom Dundon, the Canes owner, paid Rod's entire $25k fine. The final check came to $25,017, the extra $17 is because Rod's old number (that's hanging from the ceiling at PNC Arena in Raleigh) was 17. This shows that Dundon has Rod's back (which is a good thing to do when he's right).
Thank god Laf didn't go to the leafs honestly. Would have been a waste of a career. I'M ONLY PARTIALLY JOKING CALM DOWN...
Yikes, Steve. As a Wild fan, don't try and tell me that they don't contribute anything...
1) They bolster my local liquor store's Powers whiskey sales
2) They always finish near the upper middle and vault whomever plays them in the first round of the playoffs a pretty easy road ahead.
3) They provide one of the most welcoming and luxurious arenas for visiting fans.
4) They consistently break the hearts of the Avalanche faithful/arrogant.
5) They're never bad enough to snag a top-flight talent in the draft.
6) Last but not least, in 2012 they taught the rest of the league the perils of front-loading so much of the salary cap into a small number of its "stars." That move completely hamstrung the team for nearly a decade and they may never climb out of the doldrums until those guys retire. Well, they taught every team except the Maple Leafs, it seems. So, I guess maybe their latest contribution is to keep the Leafs' cupless streak alive and save Lafrenier from being grossly underutilized in the talent-bomb that is Toronto.
Jokes and jabs aside, I love your show more than most and look forward to Hat Picks and Dang-its every week. Thanks for all you do, congrats on the healthy baby, and I wish you nothing but the best. Cheers from just south of the border!
I don't know why Steve's so upset about not getting the first overall pick. It's not like the Leafs can afford to sign anyone
They could ditch the rest of their defense.?.
I have to disagree...I don't think he had it covered long enough to be considered a frozen puck. He touched it, which makes the hand-pass null. It was knocked out from under his glove (which, a frozen puck by the goalie is not reviewable) and put into the goal. The players are taught to play-til-the-whistle...that's what they did. It is close, but it looks like a goal to me. Now, with that said...I have to say that the ref not telling coach what the call on the ice was is ridiculous. And I wish that like the NFL, all aspects (ALL ASPECTS) were reviewable. Then they could rule that this was covered (even though I don't think it was). But at least if freezing the puck was reviewable at all, they COULD say that he had it covered, or that the ref lost sight of the puck, or whatever.
Here's what I don't understand about the 2nd lottery...why were the teams placed in THAT order? If each ball has same weight and size...I would imagine it would have made more sense to place them in order of standings...if they did that...Florida's ball would have been in the place where the Rangers ball was...also, if they gave the pick to the Qualifying Team E...the team that did technically win the lottery...that would have ALSO been Florida...I'd be pissed if I was a Florida fan.
Mrazek didn’t even cover the puck for a second. Refs don’t immediately blow the play dead, especially when the goaltender leaps out of the crease to try and make a save. Now. Should there have been GI? No. Bjork technically had possession of the puck even after Mrazek slammed his glove on Bjork’s stick/puck. Should this have been a hand pass? No. The puck bounced off of the Carolina defender. It’s as simple as that. Now, if the call on the ice were to be reversed from good goal, the game still would’ve been tied. Carolina wouldn’t have scored that shorty since they wouldn’t have been assessed a minor for the failed challenge. Boston still would’ve won.
good. Toronto doenst deserve the 1st overall pick. neither did ANY of the other teams that were "eligible"...why NHL has a lottery is beyond me. 31st, picks 1st, 1st picks 31st. its that simple. EVERY other sport understands that, NHL is that red headed step child nobody understands.
A few things on the league
There is no conspiracy...the Leafs have won a top pick. They have him on their team and he's good. The Rangers haven't ever won one. They did now. Sorry the Leafs only have one top pick in the last few years. That's a rough rough go. Oh except they signed a second top pick from the Islanders. And yes he's on the team now. So that's two top picks. They still lost. And guess what... I'm positive the Leafs fans were giddy to join in on those 1940 chants before the Rangers won for the first time in 54 freaking years. And guess what! The Leafs are thiiiiiiis close to that 54 year mark. And they better win next year or else man they will probably go longer than 54. So when do we start those chants around the league? Yes the Rangers got their first top pick. And it was sweet. Still is actually....
and officials... This all started long ago when the league decided to adjust penalties to "open up the game and reduce interference and hooking etc.." It took the refs 3 years to understand what hooking is and still get it twisted because hooking is now "holding a stick horizontal to the ice". And cross checking effectively became legal. Because I guess that doesn't slow up the game. Then video replay. All of these things are trying to perfect what ain't all that broken. And it leads to this kind of thing. Or things like offsides replays that bring back goals when the offsides wasn't relevant to the play. Etc... Brindamour schooled David Quinn and now the league. And he's dead on.
Lgr
Hi Steve, I just watched a highlight Dang-It you will no doubt have on your next dang it video. The Chicago goal scored off of the goalies head! That's a huge Dang-It! Love all of your videos and your channel. I'm a Flyers fan but my daughter loves the Leafs, all because I got her a Leafs zamboni out of a claw machine when I took her to a movie when she was younger. Lol! Stay safe.
The irony of Toronto getting knocked out of the playoffs by Columbus, and then losing the #1 pick because the Wild's ball knocks them out of the way....Both teams joined the league in 2000...
I don't see what was wrong with the call on the Boston goal. A Boston players touched the puck with his glove, then Mrazek covered it, but immediately flipped it backwards. so, he didn't cover it long enough for a stoppage, and negated the hand pass from the Boston player gloving it by playing it. What am I missing?
Coyle's "goal" was an absolutely pathetic call. The NHL and their officials showed their ineptitude. 2 solid reasons to waive it off but somehow they added -1 and -1 and ended up with +1. Absolute idiocy no matter how you look at it.
What a Leaf's fan, Montreal wins 5 - 0 and you're still finding ways to trash on us, "you're gonna have to rely on Carey Price" hey y'know there's more people than Carey Price, it seems like everyone likes to disrespect everyone on the canadiens but Price, I know its a dang it that moment but the comments after that like, dude, don't you have some leaf's golfing skills to praise right now
Dip into this now and again...never have been interested in botched plays. I think the basic psychology behind those who find this amusing or entertaining is jealousy / inferiority / insecurity. Guy slips on banana peel: I laugh -- it didn't happen to me, which reminds me that there are other, stupider more generally embarrassed people in the world, which is comforting.This is schadenfreude - gladness to not the be person being laughed at. At the root of schadenfreude is dehumanization. The definition of dehumanization: Dehumanization is the process of perceiving a person or social group as lacking the attributes that define what it means to be human.
I already been pretty aware of these connections, which always made me both wonder and get angry when I see people not only express schadenfreude, but do so without any doubt it might be immoral.
The only thing better would've been if it was Bostons or the Canadiens ball that knocked it out of the way. Also how is 4 players taking over 40 million of your cap and getting shutout in an elimination game, not a Dangit. Steve Dangle needs to rant on himself like he did with the refs. He make and change the rules every year, and you can't enforce your own rules. NJ Devils fans need to rise up!
Sorry Steve, but if the Leafs can't win a playoff series with Matthews and Tavares, I don't think Lafreniere will help. Also you're gonna have to relax, the Wild organization didn't do anything to make the ping pong balls bounce around strangely, and we haven't done anything to anyone in as long as I can remember. Channel all of that anger from the draft lottery and yell at the refs some more next week, then we'll all be cool again.
Here's a Dang it
Ouellet : It is pronounced "Well"-et not "Who"-let
Well..... Maybe this time Steve's right and it is "Who"-let Grant run into Price?
I think the nhl is thanking the Minnesota Wild bc if Toronto won hockey would have been ruined
That "Wild" ball is my hero
Me watching this after the habs flyers 5-0 game 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
omg...I only recently started watching your videos but I so sorry if someone already said it or people say it all the time but I can't be the first to notice that you look just like Andrew Scheer??? XD
I would say for the Carolina dang it: The ref's call was good goal so it should not be up to the ref to tell the coach what to challenge. Of course the fact that after the review the ref basically comes on the mic and says (I paraphrase) "There was no goal because the goalie covered the puck but because you challenged the wrong thing the call on the ice, which was wrong, stands and you get two minutes for delay of game." is absolutely ridiculous.
The Leafs didn’t deserve the first overall pick. The Pens didn’t deserve it either. The Rangers and the Wild were far more deserving. The Leafs have two first overall picks that are overpaid and don’t contribute for how much they make.
The heavenly heavy hellish turret complementarily shrug because quill immunohistologically tip during a one wool. earsplitting, second-hand bagpipe
I say that the Minnesota Wild were about to rise to claim their very first 1st over-all in franchise history, and the Leafs ball got in the way! Why didn't you just step aside and let our ball through, Dangle!
I missed you Mr. Dangit Dangle. I love hockey. I hope everyone is ok and if you’re reading this that means you have an iPhone or computer so your life could be worse. Have nice day.
If the Leafs had won every other team, every other team's fans would have spazzed. With the Rangers winning, most of us went. eh, at least it was TO, Oilers or Pens.
The ref even said that that Mrazek had control of the puck. Well then wouldn't it be goalie interference because a Bruins player knocked it out? The refs were garbage that game.
Ok wait... so they ruled that the goaltender froze the puck, overruling the hand pass... ok that's fine, but if he had it frozen, why was it then not a stoppage of play for the goaltender having it frozen?
I was hoping to see the Canucks lighting up the former champs, who have not scored a 3rd period goal, also do you think murray just lost his job? Is Jarry now the starter
It's bad that they get fined cuz the refs get there feeling hurt.
that was no goal in any decade like the 80's the 90's 2000's and so on.
The refs need to know the rules of there own game they are reffing.
The boston dude hit the puck out of the goalie's hand and it is clear as day.
That Canes incident was a joke. They challenge for a hand pass and not get the call when they could have, perhaps should have gone with goalie interference instead but when the ref himself says that the goalie had frozen the puck, then he's frozen the puck, play should be dead, either way that should have been a no goal.
Will the next dang its video have the officiating of game 2 of the Boston Carolina series? They came out and proved Rod Brind'amour right by being garbage
Why aren't the refs allowed to change/correct their call after given more information. Isn't that the point of more technology, to get the call RIGHT, not to challenge an uninformed call?
Montreal or Boston will win the cup in Toronto's house just to drive in the dagger a little harder......
Sorry Steve but prepare yourself. 😥
Shout out to the PA people in Edmonton... playing the Home Improvement theme song while Robin Lenner's skate is being repaired!
It's a goal cuz it's Boston.
Leafs definitely didn't deserve to win the draft lottery. You're top 4 guys are 'worth' more than the entire 12 forwards for the Blue Jackets
I was watching that Canadiens game and I saw that guy slip and fall. They played 3 games that day I think and the ice was pretty bad.