As a hawks fan, I have to view the Blue Jackets as a good team. Otherwise, I can't say my Blackhawks are good. Both are very equal right now. Laine is making a huge impact on your power play. Should be a good game tomorrow good luck!
@@MichaelShrute-wt9cu How about this: I would love to enjoy the goals but I know in the back of my mind that we're going to give them up again in the 3rd.
As a goalie, we are trained our entire lives to get up and reset as fast as possible, Ghallager was pushed and Murray had more than enough time to get up, easy goal
Just curious, since he got completely spun around, do you think he would have had time to locate the puck and be in the right position to save it? When the puck is travelling at 80mph+ 2-3 seconds is not very long. No disrespect, just curious?
@@gamingsavy2669 that’s a good question, and honestly it seems like a potential toss up, because on the one hand he is a professional goalie, he should know how to quickly identify where the play is going and who people are focused on to help identify the location of puck but in fairness he did have body’s in front of the net. I still believe it was a goal though since that isn’t the argument that was brought up and goalies get lost all the time.
@@Aliw23 So the question is, is the goalie ready when he sees the puck? As an NHL goalie Murray had enough time to reset for a potential shot especially since Gally had enough time to get run over by a Sens player. There was enough time for him to reset.
At least Hasek knew what he was doing and went pads first into the player. Whereas Markstrom looked like he tried to save the player in the butterfly, and in the second one... I think even he's still wondering about that one.
@@TheJohtaja I mean both were good intentions I guess. Horvat is gonna score on a breakaway. And Tanner Pearson is a pretty good player. But nevertheless it was kinda funny.
Did you watch like literally thirty seconds after that part? He was saying that was the thought process going into the game for fans. Right after he says that he was fired the next morning. Turn your hearing aid up
@@johnolar4326 Dude, relax, its a joke...one that 88 other people got while someone was pissing in your Cheerios. Over 200 people if you include the other top comment mentioning it.
Literally when that Montreal goal review was initiated I said “This is EXACTLY what Steve means when he says we can’t celebrate goals without paranoia anymore!” lmao
@@CS-ks3yy the Rangers said the claims were fabricated in their official statement. He requested the leave of absence, maybe he was shook by the potential impact of the false claims
Markström has always had a tendency to leave the net to challange the puck in situations like that. Especially when he's frustrated. He's been doing it since he was young but the first time I can think of that was recorded was that Junior championship final (I think it was the finals) between Sweden and Canada
I'm a goalie, have been for 32 years. That was NOT interference, because the goalie had plenty of time to get back into position. However, everyone (almost) had more or less stopped play. The goalie wasn't even watching the play anymore. The question in my mind is whether the play should be considered stopped. The ref had not blown the whistle, so the play was live. It's on the GOALIE to stay focused on the play until he hears a whistle. Therefore, to me, this is a good goal.
You talk about the crosscheck in front of the goalie. Reminds me of Reaves and the Vegas Knights in the Stanley Cup finals and how the check led to a Vegas goal. I was screaming at my tv so much I nearly lost my voice
I for one was not expecting the Ducks @ Coyotes appearance in this video to be anything other than my Ducks blowing a 3-0 lead to lose.... twice in a row.
I don't think the Gallagher tip should count because the first goal, the one that went in under the bar, was the goal that got waved off by the officials.. So they reset the clock to that point, disallowing two goals.
On the Montreal goal that was called back can we just mention that Ottawa actually used their time out in the second period and you actually can’t use a coaches challenge if you don’t have a timeout so the video room actually initiated it themselves I may be wrong but I’ve never seen that in the NHL before
Drewducer and Steve watch the jets game today Feb. 25 against Montreal, you will have to listen very closely around 13:47 on the clock in the first period. You will hear the dang it at the whistle
Bro i fir sure thought you'd mention the havs vs leafs game with the double revision on the habs goal and the back and forth decision of it being a goal...and then a goal....and then not a goal anymore...I was really looking forward to what you'd have to say about that
As a Ducks fan, we suck so much this year so it makes sense the Coyotes didn't want to be the team that gives us a win, but man that was some really shoddy defense. You can bump into the guy but don't smack him with your stick multiple times. Also, Markstrom leaving the net is very clearly a sign that a goalie is sick and tired of his defense giving up constant breakaways against him even if leaving the net looks silly. Calgary gotta lock it down.
The new meta in the NHL is going to be "if it's a scrum infront of your net just push any attacker on your own goalie and call goalie interference if it goes in".
Don't know what the crease rule is now as they keep changing it, but it used to be players weren't allowed in the blue paint unless the puck was there before them. They should bring that back.
I'd say that Murray doesn't have full opportunity to get reset. The contact was initiated at the top of the goal crease and when he is facing the play again Murray has been forced back onto his own goal line. Gallagher is still deep in the blue paint forcing Murray to have to try to make any saves directly from the goal line. Gallagher had plenty of opportunity to vacate the blue paint after the contact but didn't and redirected the puck from inside the goal crease.
I feel like the second period of Tuesday's Oilers/Canucks game deserved an honourable mention. First the scoreboard clock was somehow showing 54:80 to go in the period (with the tv feed displaying 55:20) forcing a stoppage, then Roussel thinking he'd gotten into a fight with Puljujarvi (of which he definitely hadn't and was subsequently fined $5k, rightly so), and then finally, to top it off, a ref calling stoppage while the puck was still in play to review whether a goal had been scored (of which no, there was in fact no goal) instead of reviewing after a natural stoppage. All in 1 period. Absolute farce.
i think steve has a point here about the fans enjoying goals in 'real time' - using video to review everything takes some of the spontaneity away and some of the fun as well. Course i say that as a fan when i'm playing it better be a good goal if its gonna count.
Not a MM Fan, but I believe they got the call right. Since Gallagher spun Murray around he lost light of the puck. One could argue that if he hadn't lost sight of the puck that he could of easily reset. However, When he lost light of the puck. The puck went from the slot to the point. You can see Murray scanning trying to find it and finally sees it tenths of a second before it goes in. I'm leaning towards no goal as well
I think the Murray interference is actually regarding the contact between Murray’s stick and Gallagher’s heel just before the goal is scored. G’s skate is in the blue thus negating the goal due to inability to reset insomuch that Murray was unable to bring his stick to the set position at the base of the 5 hole as well as bringing his shoulder around square. Yes. All the contact before that is obviously more dramatic but irrelevant when considering the last contact before the shot that scored.
Normally I'd say don't hit the goalie even if he's out of his crease but if they do something like what Markstrom did, I say free rain to plow through them. Look at what happened to Horvat his leg got clipped and he went flying uncontrollably into the boards, thankfully he didn't get hurt. Nhl needs to have some rule about a goalie purposefully challenging a player going full speed
Would've liked to see the Wings clip vs I think Florida where they messed up a 4 on 1 (attempted one pass that was missed by everyone), then Florida came right back on an odd man rush and score, but then the goal was disallowed. Several dang-its back and forth in rapid succession lol.
I agree with the cross-checking from Defensemen. I grew up playing D and my opinion is that if you have to resort to cross checking, then you obviously suck at your job.
I think it's a goal simply because, as you stated the defender would not let him out of that zone. He didn't push him into the goalie but he forced him into the path of the goalie
The league is moving backward slowly but surely into 90-00 era, where any touch with the goalie was a goalie interference. I've seen like 5 goalie interference calls in like 3 games between pens and caps. For me, that looks like a good goal. Murray had time to spin himself around after the collision, I think that's enough time for him to reset. There was a similar play last year, where Holtby was touched by a player slightly, and he spun himself around and got scored on. That was a good goal.
There’s also an argument to be made that if a forward sends himself into the blue paint- everything that happens after is his fault. If a defenseman actively holds a player down and won’t let them up, I agree it’s on the D and it should count. If a defenseman is holding his position and not allowing the forward net front position- that’s his job. A forwards job is to screen the goalie and get in front for a tip, the D shouldn’t have to let him go where he wants to because he already crashed into your goalie and is currently in the crease. The forward has an option to peel off to the side. They never will do it, but no I don’t think you can blame the D unless they actively are on top of the forward pushing him back down, or if they caused the initial contact- neither of which occurs here.
As someone who cheers for Colorado and has no care for either Montreal or Ottawa. Got tk say the goal should have counted. If the player has enough time to not only get knocked over. Then get another player on him. Then to get uo to his feet look at the play and tip the coming puck. In over 4 second. The goalie has enough time to reset. It sucks but it should have counted
There is 2 reasons the disaloud goal should have been aloud. 1. The defenseman was forcing him into the goalie 2. The goalie definitely had the opportunity to get back in position
There's an "unsung" Zamboni driver out there that is muttering between manual transmission shifts, "If I had that chance, Steve wouldn't have scored on me at all" If the coach had just put me in.. no question.
Let me just ask, if the Situation Room isn't in Toronto, where would it be? It would have to be a hockey city with no professional association. I'm fine with it being in Toronto, feels like the Headquarters of Hockey.
Steve I feel like your missing the second goal that got scored on boston in the boston philly game. Where (Idk who) broke his stick, went to the bench to get another, and both his teammate and the trainer gave him a stick, confusing him and making him take none.
![เปิดบ้าน พี่ตูน Bodyslam หลังใหม่คนแรก ที่ภูเก็ต l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/flFwcmyDQSk/mqdefault.jpg)
At this point, I’m expecting my weekly Blue Jackets segment. I can’t decide if we’re good or not lol
As a hawks fan, I have to view the Blue Jackets as a good team. Otherwise, I can't say my Blackhawks are good. Both are very equal right now. Laine is making a huge impact on your power play. Should be a good game tomorrow good luck!
I don’t think we’re good. But I also don’t think we’re bad...
Stars fan here. I like your team & hate my team playing them. Pobodys Nerfect.
If the canes can beat you, yeah you suck
@@jennifercongleton8546 Nah, maybe if the league and their “intermission no penalty but still good goal” calls didn’t suck, we wouldn’t suck.
I would love to celebrate goals too, Steve, but there's just one small problem:
I'm a Canucks fan.
Plenty of goals to celebrate...oh wait you meant for the Canucks...my bad
As a Wings fan, my heart goes out to you.
@@ChrisTallant Thank you, my dude. I hope you are treating Troy Stecher well, and I hope he is serving the Wings well also.
@@ajyu7289 Bro, we try. We really, really try. But..... ---waves--- eh.
@@MichaelShrute-wt9cu How about this: I would love to enjoy the goals but I know in the back of my mind that we're going to give them up again in the 3rd.
As a goalie, we are trained our entire lives to get up and reset as fast as possible, Ghallager was pushed and Murray had more than enough time to get up, easy goal
As a goalie I can confirm this that’s a goal he got back up into the butterfly and set like 2 seconds before the shot
Just curious, since he got completely spun around, do you think he would have had time to locate the puck and be in the right position to save it? When the puck is travelling at 80mph+ 2-3 seconds is not very long. No disrespect, just curious?
@@gamingsavy2669 that’s a good question, and honestly it seems like a potential toss up, because on the one hand he is a professional goalie, he should know how to quickly identify where the play is going and who people are focused on to help identify the location of puck but in fairness he did have body’s in front of the net. I still believe it was a goal though since that isn’t the argument that was brought up and goalies get lost all the time.
Matt only got ready when Gallagher tiped the shot, so no goal. The same thing happened in another game the same night with a no Goal so its only fair
@@Aliw23 So the question is, is the goalie ready when he sees the puck? As an NHL goalie Murray had enough time to reset for a potential shot especially since Gally had enough time to get run over by a Sens player. There was enough time for him to reset.
“Rumors about Julian getting fired”
Marc Bergevin: lemme stop you right there
What rumor he did get fired he shouldn't have because of this bullshit call but he did indeed get fired
@@lewisgriffin9684 he was quoting Steve Dangle from the video
That's producer Drew filming Steve as he scores. He really is real
It could have been someone else
Well producer Drew is real, I follow his Twitter
@@davyt0247 I still believe he’s just a picture
Did anyone else laugh at the ref screaming “No no no no no!” at 8:28
Souds like an angry grandma when you reach one time to many at the cookie jar.
I’m so glad you commented this. I missed that the first time and it’s hilarious
LMAO
Yes
Markstrom thought he was Dominic Hasek for a minute there
Apparently the refs value Markstrom higher, because Hasek got 2 minutes for that hit back then
At least Hasek knew what he was doing and went pads first into the player. Whereas Markstrom looked like he tried to save the player in the butterfly, and in the second one... I think even he's still wondering about that one.
@@TheJohtaja I mean both were good intentions I guess. Horvat is gonna score on a breakaway. And Tanner Pearson is a pretty good player. But nevertheless it was kinda funny.
"Is he alright?!"
I absolutely despise the constant glare from the Gritty figure box on the left of Steve😂😂
Ah yes RUMORS that Claude Julien COULD get fired
Did you watch like literally thirty seconds after that part? He was saying that was the thought process going into the game for fans. Right after he says that he was fired the next morning. Turn your hearing aid up
@@johnolar4326 Dude, relax, its a joke...one that 88 other people got while someone was pissing in your Cheerios. Over 200 people if you include the other top comment mentioning it.
To my eyes, Zaitsev wasn’t just holding him in the crease, he DID shove him into his goalie, watch the way his body rolls when Gallagher falls
Goal or no goal for Gallagher?
Simple answer is that whole game was horribly reffed so ya yes goal
Goal.
Goal. He got pushed in. Even a basement living Stevie Wonder could see that
Goal Gallagher was held 100%
No goal, but I’d call interference on the defender for not letting Gallagher leave the crease. Just my opinion
everyone now waiting for Mcdavid, ovechkin, etc. to get too close to their bench so they can claim them
plot twist: someone tried to claim ovi for his team, instead got claimed by the other team XD
Is that how Chara ended up on the Capitals?
Don’t blame you for not wanting to talk about that day Steve. Lead to that famous LFR...
16:53 He scored more goals than the Leafs did, and then he abruptly calmed down realizing he’s a Leafs fan 🤣🤣🤣
Somehow Steve managed to turn a Dang It against Dave Ayers into a Dang It against the Leafs
Literally when that Montreal goal review was initiated I said “This is EXACTLY what Steve means when he says we can’t celebrate goals without paranoia anymore!” lmao
The Artemi Panarin situation is a massive dang it, and a serious one
Russia is pathetic
We need to stop listening to ANY accusations without proof and stop canceling people unless they are convicted of a crime.
@@CS-ks3yy no one is canceling Panarin.
@@gordo1191 so what do you call a forced leave of absence for b.s baseless accusations
@@CS-ks3yy the Rangers said the claims were fabricated in their official statement. He requested the leave of absence, maybe he was shook by the potential impact of the false claims
10:33 Cernak went into the bench right in front of Paquette too!!
"Hey Cedric!"
What about the Canucks blowing a 3-0 lead against the Oilers?
That’s apparently just the Canucks being the Canucks, heard from a Canucks fan, personally a Oilers fan.
@BadDamnBoy first time seeing a canucks game?
@@kidjovanpurewal9260 ngl, the only time I've seen the Canucks play is when they play the oilers...
Just canucks doing canuck things
Just classic Canucks 😂
Watching NHL for me be like: oooooooh Sh*t thats gonna be on Dang its! ohhh sh't thats a hat pick!
I love the way Steve stares at the camera when he says OTTAWA SENATORS
9:51 basically what defenders are told to do against McDavid
B's fan here, and even I'm saying that the Gallagher goal should've counted.
Markström has always had a tendency to leave the net to challange the puck in situations like that. Especially when he's frustrated. He's been doing it since he was young but the first time I can think of that was recorded was that Junior championship final (I think it was the finals) between Sweden and Canada
I'm a goalie, have been for 32 years. That was NOT interference, because the goalie had plenty of time to get back into position. However, everyone (almost) had more or less stopped play. The goalie wasn't even watching the play anymore. The question in my mind is whether the play should be considered stopped. The ref had not blown the whistle, so the play was live. It's on the GOALIE to stay focused on the play until he hears a whistle. Therefore, to me, this is a good goal.
Scored more goals on David Ayres than the Leafs did *in the same amount of shots*
Gritty was staring into my soul this whole video
You talk about the crosscheck in front of the goalie. Reminds me of Reaves and the Vegas Knights in the Stanley Cup finals and how the check led to a Vegas goal. I was screaming at my tv so much I nearly lost my voice
I remember watching that Preds game and saying "This is gonna be on dang-its"
Steve: There has already been rumours that Claude Julian might get fired
Me: 😶😬
That 1st Markstrom check looked like that Martin Gabrik Vs New York one
I for one was not expecting the Ducks @ Coyotes appearance in this video to be anything other than my Ducks blowing a 3-0 lead to lose.... twice in a row.
Colorado wearing the Quebec Nordiques jersey feels like a slap in the face, and i'm a Jets fan!
It's like Haha got your team!
That Cernak "hit" was hilarious
That Callagher case absolutely should have counted. Greetings from Finland.
I don't think the Gallagher tip should count because the first goal, the one that went in under the bar, was the goal that got waved off by the officials.. So they reset the clock to that point, disallowing two goals.
13:55 - He's pulling a Dominik Hasek, that's what he's doing! :D
At least the Dominator was a winner. Markstrom is even worse without Demko.
More with the Canadiens, the Flames with 2 lucky pucks to go above Allen
For this weeks hatpicks: Coyotes 3rd goalie major save in a 2 on 1 in OT and then win the game in shootout.
and for dang its he can talk about the ducks blowing btb 3-0 leads
Seeing a small crowd during the ducks/wild game was so foreign to me
Did you notice where Cernak went in, Cedric Paquette was in a canes uni right in front of him.
On the Montreal goal that was called back can we just mention that Ottawa actually used their time out in the second period and you actually can’t use a coaches challenge if you don’t have a timeout so the video room actually initiated it themselves I may be wrong but I’ve never seen that in the NHL before
Drewducer and Steve watch the jets game today Feb. 25 against Montreal, you will have to listen very closely around 13:47 on the clock in the first period. You will hear the dang it at the whistle
Bro i fir sure thought you'd mention the havs vs leafs game with the double revision on the habs goal and the back and forth decision of it being a goal...and then a goal....and then not a goal anymore...I was really looking forward to what you'd have to say about that
I knew the Avalanche one was gonna be in there because of producer Drew xD
title got me nostalgic on baconcountry
As a Ducks fan, we suck so much this year so it makes sense the Coyotes didn't want to be the team that gives us a win, but man that was some really shoddy defense. You can bump into the guy but don't smack him with your stick multiple times.
Also, Markstrom leaving the net is very clearly a sign that a goalie is sick and tired of his defense giving up constant breakaways against him even if leaving the net looks silly. Calgary gotta lock it down.
The new meta in the NHL is going to be "if it's a scrum infront of your net just push any attacker on your own goalie and call goalie interference if it goes in".
Don't know what the crease rule is now as they keep changing it, but it used to be players weren't allowed in the blue paint unless the puck was there before them. They should bring that back.
Thank for the wonderful birthday gift of a brand new dang-its video
Thank god Matt Benning isn't an oiler anymore. Hope Nashville is happy
“The room in TORONTO” Calling a call on Montreal
Hat pick this week: I get to go to the first Jackets game of the season with some fans tomorrow!!! Great Vid Steve.
I'd say that Murray doesn't have full opportunity to get reset. The contact was initiated at the top of the goal crease and when he is facing the play again Murray has been forced back onto his own goal line. Gallagher is still deep in the blue paint forcing Murray to have to try to make any saves directly from the goal line. Gallagher had plenty of opportunity to vacate the blue paint after the contact but didn't and redirected the puck from inside the goal crease.
Wow, it looked like Ayres was trying, too. /eyeroll
Hey Steve, your second goal was pretty nice!
I agree about the reviews for offsides it's splitting hairs It reminds me of a CFL game watching a team score only to have it called back
Dude, its Murray's stick getting caught on Gallager's skate. THAT is the not able to reset issue. Steve, com'on man.
How about Forbort on Hoglander
I feel like the second period of Tuesday's Oilers/Canucks game deserved an honourable mention. First the scoreboard clock was somehow showing 54:80 to go in the period (with the tv feed displaying 55:20) forcing a stoppage, then Roussel thinking he'd gotten into a fight with Puljujarvi (of which he definitely hadn't and was subsequently fined $5k, rightly so), and then finally, to top it off, a ref calling stoppage while the puck was still in play to review whether a goal had been scored (of which no, there was in fact no goal) instead of reviewing after a natural stoppage. All in 1 period. Absolute farce.
Watched a USHL game last month where the Goalie came out like Markstrom did, and the Forward got a 5min Charging and Game Misconduct ejection.
i think steve has a point here about the fans enjoying goals in 'real time' - using video to review everything takes some of the spontaneity away and some of the fun as well. Course i say that as a fan when i'm playing it better be a good goal if its gonna count.
Tip: Don't trash talk a team and expect your team to not get trash talked it happened last week for the pinned comment yikes 😬
I’ve been checking every half an hour today to see if this has uploaded yet
after watching that nasvhille game i knew the linesman thing would end up on dang its
I knew Bo would show up on here
You mean BoHo?
Not a MM Fan, but I believe they got the call right. Since Gallagher spun Murray around he lost light of the puck. One could argue that if he hadn't lost sight of the puck that he could of easily reset. However, When he lost light of the puck. The puck went from the slot to the point. You can see Murray scanning trying to find it and finally sees it tenths of a second before it goes in. I'm leaning towards no goal as well
I think the Murray interference is actually regarding the contact between Murray’s stick and Gallagher’s heel just before the goal is scored. G’s skate is in the blue thus negating the goal due to inability to reset insomuch that Murray was unable to bring his stick to the set position at the base of the 5 hole as well as bringing his shoulder around square. Yes. All the contact before that is obviously more dramatic but irrelevant when considering the last contact before the shot that scored.
14:18 Honestly that kinda reminds me of a similar thing Dominik Hašek pulled off when he was a Red Wing.
Markstrom looked like your little brother accidentally switching to his goaltender.
The best part about the lightning dang it is that paquette shoved him further down
Normally I'd say don't hit the goalie even if he's out of his crease but if they do something like what Markstrom did, I say free rain to plow through them. Look at what happened to Horvat his leg got clipped and he went flying uncontrollably into the boards, thankfully he didn't get hurt. Nhl needs to have some rule about a goalie purposefully challenging a player going full speed
The sun delay at the Colorado/Vegas game seems like a bit of a dang-it too
As a predators fan, I appreciate you pointing out how unlucky they have been this year.
OMG I´m just so glad that the two goals in 11 seconds againts the sharks weren´t in this video lol
Would've liked to see the Wings clip vs I think Florida where they messed up a 4 on 1 (attempted one pass that was missed by everyone), then Florida came right back on an odd man rush and score, but then the goal was disallowed. Several dang-its back and forth in rapid succession lol.
The fact you can score on Ayr’s just proves the point that Toronto’s loss against him is utter shameful.
I agree with the cross-checking from Defensemen. I grew up playing D and my opinion is that if you have to resort to cross checking, then you obviously suck at your job.
I didn't realize that Matt Murray was traded and I am a pens fan
Bruh
You missed the penguins and capitals game where there was 2 goalie interference calls for no reason.. 1 on Pittsburgh and 1 on Washington
I think it's a goal simply because, as you stated the defender would not let him out of that zone. He didn't push him into the goalie but he forced him into the path of the goalie
Bowen byrum should be honored. He was one Steve’s dang it’s in his debut
The league is moving backward slowly but surely into 90-00 era, where any touch with the goalie was a goalie interference. I've seen like 5 goalie interference calls in like 3 games between pens and caps. For me, that looks like a good goal. Murray had time to spin himself around after the collision, I think that's enough time for him to reset. There was a similar play last year, where Holtby was touched by a player slightly, and he spun himself around and got scored on. That was a good goal.
14:35 Pearson chirped 'Come on Home buddy'
There’s also an argument to be made that if a forward sends himself into the blue paint- everything that happens after is his fault. If a defenseman actively holds a player down and won’t let them up, I agree it’s on the D and it should count. If a defenseman is holding his position and not allowing the forward net front position- that’s his job. A forwards job is to screen the goalie and get in front for a tip, the D shouldn’t have to let him go where he wants to because he already crashed into your goalie and is currently in the crease. The forward has an option to peel off to the side. They never will do it, but no I don’t think you can blame the D unless they actively are on top of the forward pushing him back down, or if they caused the initial contact- neither of which occurs here.
As someone who cheers for Colorado and has no care for either Montreal or Ottawa. Got tk say the goal should have counted. If the player has enough time to not only get knocked over. Then get another player on him. Then to get uo to his feet look at the play and tip the coming puck. In over 4 second. The goalie has enough time to reset. It sucks but it should have counted
There is 2 reasons the disaloud goal should have been aloud.
1. The defenseman was forcing him into the goalie
2. The goalie definitely had the opportunity to get back in position
The cool thing about being a Canucks fan is you don't need to watch the games ,you just need to watch dang its
That TH-cam guy 🤣🤣🤣 classic
There's an "unsung" Zamboni driver out there that is muttering between manual transmission shifts, "If I had that chance, Steve wouldn't have scored on me at all" If the coach had just put me in.. no question.
Anton Khudobin verse the Florida Panthers is one giant dang it
I am a Bruins fan. I say it was a goal in the Montreal game. Gallagher was prevented from leaving the crease.
Scott Foster vs David Ayers - who are you taking?
Let me just ask, if the Situation Room isn't in Toronto, where would it be? It would have to be a hockey city with no professional association. I'm fine with it being in Toronto, feels like the Headquarters of Hockey.
Price who didn't stopped the weak backhand shot that tied the game should be in this episode
Steve I feel like your missing the second goal that got scored on boston in the boston philly game. Where (Idk who) broke his stick, went to the bench to get another, and both his teammate and the trainer gave him a stick, confusing him and making him take none.
Wings also got a favorable call on a no-goal review (I’m a Wings fan). Kind of a weird trend in officiating
My first GAA was by my own teammate trying to fire the puck around the boards. He made the shot of his life and put it between my pad and the post.
Here’s a thing tho. The Leafs only scored two on Ayers. Steve is better than the Leafs
We need Letang's stick problems against the Caps next week.