Maratha Empire Family Tree | Hindu Dynasties
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2020
- Download the PDF (free):
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/183...
Odd Compass Channel (Indian History):
/ @oddcompass
The Life & Times of Malik Ambar:
• The Slave Who Defeated...
Mughal Emperors Family Tree:
• Video
CREDITS:
Chart/Script: Matt Baker
Narration/Editing: @JackRackam
Intro animation: @AlMuqaddimahYT
Intro music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com
As a Maharashtra-ian ( Marathi ) Person , I would really like to thank you for making this Video and providing the PDF of the Chart for free. My parents told me that our ancestors were in the Navy of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, so this video means a lot me. Lot of love and Respect from Mumbai .
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
@@yogeshjog6072 True
Where is the pdf??please answer for an Indian
Link is in the description.
@ferzy09 no buddy
Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time
balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu)
Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713.
*So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu.
He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds.
He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu*
All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers.
N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.
Fantastic video! Glad to be involved in presenting Indian history to the world.
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Went to ur channel cannot find vdo which is bout shahuji sharifji n Sufi
@@yogeshjog6072 Hey Yogesh, I think you may have mistakenly replied to me instead of UsefulCharts.
@ferzy09 no boy.. shahu was never titular.
Inactive militarily (like sambhaji shivaji rajaram maharaj was) but he never had a de facto ruler overpowering his authority as maratha king until he died.
Will explain later in longer comment with exact relation of peshwa shahu with possibly reference links. With each of bhat peshwa 3 in his life.
@@OddCompass it's my view on this vdo sir.
I wish it be read by many interested history lovers, so I paste in major threads.
List of Marathi dynasties:
Holkars of Indore
Shindes of Gwalior
Gaikwads of Baroda
Bhonsales of Nagpur
Pawars of Dhar
Patwardhans of Phaltan
Bhoites of Jalgaon
Newalkars of Jhansi
Peshwa dynasty
@@nilekarmayur No, they were pretty much maratha dynasties
Patwardhan...of Phaltan....what do u mean....what period of their ruling
These were those who allied with british. Bhonsles of Tanjore or Those of Satara fought the british and lost.
Shinde dynasty is still alive
Marathas has to be only empire which was caste neutral. All castes like Rajputs, Brahmins, Dalits etc came together to achieve Swaraj.
Castes comes when British rule start, it was Jaati and it is very different from cast.
That is not true. The Marathas after Balaji were really racist idiots. That's why so many other "hindu" kingdoms ended up supporting the Afghans instead of the Marathas who did not respect their independence.
That was only true till Chhatrapati rule
After Peshwas took over casteism touched new heights in the Maratha Empire
@@abhishekpawar5126 lol. Brahmin bashing . 😂
@@adwaitnaravane5285 u hate that peshwas took Maratha Empire to its zenith. So u want to descredit them only because they are Brahmins
While in the Air Force, I was in Gwalior India for two weeks. We got to visit the Maharaja palace which is more of a museum now. They had a dining room with a silver liquor train that ran over the table. They had a two ton chandelier hanging in the ball room. The legend was that the Maharaja had two elephants walk on the ceiling to make sure it could hand the chandelier. It was amazing!
Where do you live sir ?
@@aakarshmaurya2265 I live in North Dakota USA. I was in the USAF for 20 years and attended a Cope India at Gwalior AB India.
@yeh koi IMRANdi KHANa hai ?? Oh beti fauji fauji hota hai chahe wo yha ka ho ya mitra desh ka.
Apne desh ke seniko ka samman zaroor karo aur dusre desho ke seniko ka bhi.
Pakistan is an exception 😁.
Ab Sir ka mtlb izzat se talve chaatna kab ho gya
Still you can see the Maharajas of Gwalior, they made their palace a museum and now constructed a new palace...
🚩Long live Chatrapati Maharaj Shivaji Bhosle🚩🚩🚩
🌹🌹🌹🙏
🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!
It's great to see doing Indian families. Love from India.
same
Jai Maratha
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Happy to learn Maratha royal family tree by you 💙. This is also very useful for Indian competitive exams 😉. Love you from 🇮🇳🇮🇳
I Respect Marathi people .
I am an tamizhan.
As a Maratha n marathi we don't respect periyari tamizhan ricebags
@@cr-mo1op respect the cholas then
We are Marathi but we are also Indian proud of Indian.
@@cr-mo1op periyar moment Tamil Nadu fought for the cast system
@@ashwinvk4124 😂😂😂 that’s what your people say? He was British agent, anti Hindu n Google it what he said about Tamil language n what his followers did to Hindu gods. N we know what he did to his own foster child.
i dont see you mentioning Christian nationalist or Islamist/muslim nationalist in any of your video about Muslims or Christian empires nor have i seen you mention ethnonalionalist then how is "Hindu nationalist" relevant to this?
Typical westerner
My ancesters are from holkars, was one of the state in maratha empire. You didn't added them in chart 😁
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Yeah holkars ruled indore
@Rupesh Thakare tera baap deshdrohi
Yes🙏👍👍👍👍😄
@Rushabh Thakare.Thakur
Kon desh drohi
Jack: Europe is connected to Asia.
Me: laughs in British Isles
*laughs in Iceland*
Britain and Ireland are on the continental shelf of Europe. Much as Long Island (and Greenland) are on the continental shelf of North America.
We are still in Europe! Europe and EU are different!صلاح محمد الجعلي
@@renshiwu305 Well done, very true.
British Isles are on the Eurasian tectonic plate but India has its own plate.
It's a bit sad that there was no mention of Rani Laxmibai but otherwise, great vid!
@Bricp she was also a maratha and part of maratha Confederacy.
@Bricp even peshwa bajirao, gawkawad of baroda, scindia of gwalior and holkar of indore were not descendants of Shivaji Maharaj. All these dynasties were part of Maratha Confederacy aka Maratha empire with Shivaji Maharaj's descendants at Satara as their nominal emperor.
Thank you for making so informative video on Hindu Royals Dynasties...My ancestors were part of Maratha army for generations so this video meant a lot to me , we still have our ancestral home near Royal palace and Kings court also known as JUNA RAJWADA BHAWANI MANDAP here in Kolhapur...
Lot of love and Respect from Kolhapur 🚩🚩🚩
Jay Bhawani Jay Shivaji 🚩🚩🚩
I couldn't understand why few marathas faught for the throne, if they stayed united all the time India would have been something else. But thanks for explaining ❤️❤️
I am indian and watch every single one of your videos I was very happy when I saw u uploaded a indian royal dynasty
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Shivaji: Save, Maratha!
Mughals: Why did you say that name!
Baburids great imperia
@@greattimurempire7596 mongols were defeated by Marathas
@@Noone-gz8li marathas were defeated by british empire
@@samimahmood5877 British Empire only defeated Marathas at the end, however most wars between the British and Maratha consisted of Maratha victories.
I'm early for once! Just wanted to say, I have always loved how Usefulcharts covers a lot of history and family trees from all over the world and from many different cultures. It's good to see, and I wish we didn't have such Euro/white-centric history in the classroom.
The505Guys It’s not to say other countries’ histories aren’t important, or that we shouldn’t learn them. However it would be ludicrous to say that a “Eurocentric” point of view doesn’t make sense, given how the future USA was settled and developed by Europeans.
@@Zach-mw5so That's a funny spin on "built on Native genocide and African slavery". Comments like this just prove the point that everything we teach our kids is filtered through a European lens.
TsovLoj Not even worth a debate with comments like that.
Baburids great Empire
@@tsovloj6510 and they might want to learn there own european history
Thank you very much UsefulCharts! Your team is doing very informative work. Schools in India (and the world) would be happy to have you as their history teacher.
Thankyou So much for the PDF! I Can’t imagine people like you still exist! I am admirer of English and one day will start my own historic company!
The Indian monarchical titles were not done away with in 1947. They were abolished under PM Indira Ghandi. From 1947 the titles and honours (like the 21 gunshot salute) remained until then, but in 1947 the power of these monarchs was mostly done away with. There were a few exeptions. But not anymore.
Holkars of Indore, Bhosles of Nagpur and Bhosles of Thanjavur have not been covered at all in the so called Useful Charts.
Great ! Was looking for this clarity.
Great work!
Looking forward for more
I think Holkars were also the part of maratha dynasty you missed them 😊
Holkars are not Maratha by Caste.
@@pankajkumarswain4855 there was nothing like maratha as a cast.. it was made up to divide forces during british occupation. As for Holkar family, Malharrao holkar was originally from place near pune region (होळ). And he was part of Maratha empire. Most important one leading northen expansion.
Peswa-maratha
Shinde-kunbi
Holkar-dhangar
@@pandit_thanos5135 peshwa were bramhin and shinde and holkars were maratha
@@pankajkumarswain4855 holkars are maratha bro
Hey, You should definitely make a video on the Nepali royal dynastys Shahs being the kings and Ranas being a hereditary prime Minister dyanasty. You should also include the 3 malla dynasties that ruled Kathmandu before the Gurkha Shahs took over. It would be a really interesting video. The royal family ended in 2007 but really in 2000 when the royal massacre happened.
Please reply if you plan to make a video. I'll email you useful information and details.
Thanks 😊 🙏 😊
Ranas of nepal also migrated frm mewar
Thx for making this, it was really interesting
Quiet a good research, being a maratha loved it personally
Yeah ..bhari video ahe..pn he log mahabhart time cha United bharat mention ka kart nahit
Lol that's why I hate em maratha is cast and all cast help him to build empire but in return they get shit and only one racing cast takes credit
@@bestclips4525 before Shivaji maharaj , their was no marathi caste, people used to say that but in history their was not a single time mentioned about Maratha name .
And about saint and educational base , saint dnyaneshwar ,to saint aknath spirtual books ,in that book all caste mentioned except Maratha.
Maratha is like a battalion , fighter caste .even tho not all todays Maratha did not participate as a mawala with ahivaji maharaj , few of them ,in that area with CH shivaji maharaj
@@bestclips4525 par chutiye Tumhe kuch pata nahi hai maratha sena mein ladhne wale 80% jawan farmer the jo aaj maratha hai Farmers.. 20 percent baki caste thi Jisme baki kam karne wale the
Hey Jack and OddCompass. Great video!
Well presented , appreciate the effort to pronounce names properly. Kindly consider couple of points when updating the version :
a) True India was a collection of kingdoms, but unlike Europe the kingdoms were bound by common civilisational ethos based on sanatana dharma. Hence any internecine wars wete more a territorial issue for kings and hence common people and their life were largely unaffected .
b) Pluralism had never worried hindus, but the Islam's assault and forced conversion was not accepted. Marathas definitely stood for hindus and their culture , but as unique people in the world the hindu marathas like the hindu Vijayanagar before them , never oppressed or differentiated their subjects on religious grounds nor inflicted genocide on the enemy's people that the Islam and European colonial armies used to do
C) it is not correct to term Mughals as tolerant to hindus. It is just the extent of resistance they faced that made them compromise and do with subtle aggression like jezia tax , buying out some enemies, fostering marriage based alliance etc. Ofcourse Aurangazeb carried out unabashed atrocity on hindus.
He only said the early Mughals were more tolerant than the later ones. That's true.
Thanks for covering!
Jack Rackham my god what a surprise , keep up the good work in your channel, i really enjoy it
There is an error on the chart
Venkoji is shown as Shahaji's brother, he is not. He is Shahaji's son from his other wife Tukabai and he is Shivaji's half brother
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
@@yogeshjog6072 no offence,but the Peshwa and generals run the show since the 2nd Peshwa.
Paste-
Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time
balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu)
Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713.
*So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu.
He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds.
He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu*
All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers.
N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.
@@cs-mi8ur no offence taken bro.
Yes they run the show from 3rd bhat peshwa. But Surely not second.
I've pasted detailed comment no 2. Hope u read.
I can also narrate u another incidence, where peshwa 3 and bhosale of nagpur come at cross at ganga river over who is authority to revenue collections in Bengal.
Where *shahu grants east (orrisaa Bengal) to nagpur bhosale* circa 1745-50. (Gotta read for exact dates, and exact episode again.)
And *peshwa since then keeps away from Bengal* (even after shahu dies further peshwas n pune *never cross nagpur rights in east* .)
Just Imagine brother what happened if Shambhaji shahaji Bhosle and Shambhaji maharaj completed their term , I think Bhosle Dynasty had more Fame in history .
Holkar, Tanjaur Bhosale are missing. Holkar were equally important to Shinde and more prominent than Gaekwads of Baroda.
We are the bhosale of Thanjavur clans but we don't know our history now
Very detailed and most updated version till date....... Great job !!
Love and respect from Pune ( De Facto capital of Maratha Empire !!)
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Awesome video, thank you for the detailed explanation.
1 mistake: India was unified 2 times only under 1 ruler but idea of 1 India is very old. That's the reason 1 of our 2 epics is Mahabharat. Meaning great india. Culturally & by our values & traditions bases we were always 1.
Rest liked the lecture a lot❤️😘👌🏼
Thank you for making this video
Love From India-Maharashtra n Maratha Family 👍 Gud Work
Great to explained this chart very well with the details of Maratha and Peshwa families with the ruling period.
Hey guys! Would you maybe get into the dynasties of the states in the Holy Roman Empire and subsequently the German Emprire? I think it would be a lot of fun to see all the connections, since there were quite a few of them.
BTW I had the east and west European charts framed and hanged on my wall for my birthday. I love them a lot.
Keep up the good work!
A Hungarian from Germany
You should do a family tree on Vanderbilt's! They have many modern interesting descendents like Anderson Cooper and Timothy Oliphant
Loved it man
Its amazing how foreigners are slowing showing interest in Indian history..............just like we Indians were studying napolean, bismark, russian tzars and Hitler till now.
@General Zorawar Singh yes they do ...we studied them in history ww2 chapter
@General Zorawar Singh CBSE class 10th
First time a channel so interesting and amazing .
I did right away subscribed without any second thought
Outstanding research and very good and the explanation is such that even a kid can understand it perfectly.
Hatsoff to the channel owner .
Please keep bringing such interesting topics.
Excellent video..... happy to see a video on indian rulers
Yay new video
THE GREAT MARATHA
Fun fact : Bajirao's son Shamsher Bahadur was a muslim because his mother came from a muslim family and he was born before their marriage so the people did not recognise his legitimacy ,his original name was to be krishna but instead he became Shamsher Bahadur
It's not fun fact, Infact you are trying to hurt Muslims sensitive.
Shameful hindu politics.
@@ahmeddf97 how is that disrespectful if anything this shows how many indian ruler were secular and were fighting against religious discrimination
Abhishek Raj
Mastani, Bajirao's 2nd wife was born to a Hindu rajput Raja and his persian concubine.
@@muraligopal212 she wasn't Persians just a Muslim from ganges plains decedent of a persio-turk family that settled in north India.
Then why didn't you make this Chart before ........if you have degdeep facts about the same....
Point of Information: Yuvraj Sambhajiraje Chatrapati is the current Chatrapati of the Kolhapur branch, he is an Indian politician with the BJP who served as the member in the upper house of the Parliament of India.
Nicely explained a complicated history of a few centuries in a compact chart form. Thanks!
thanks for the video ~
I am ABSOLUTELY LOVE your channel and am addicted to it and I am also learning a lot. Thanks for making me look cool in front of my friends and family 😂💞 more on India please!!
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Great to know about Maratha dynasty. Studious presentation 👍
maratha tree given so much in detail! Nice
Useful charts--,
👏🌹🙏 Thanks!!, the video is beautifully done!!
🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!
Thanks a lot for this wonderfull video
good info. Almost updated and correct
its great to see you colab with jack rackam. Will he upload anything to his chanel as a collaboration?
In addition to having his own channel, Jack actually works for UsefulCharts as a second narrator. He's done lots of videos here :)
2:54 the “claim” was actually quite legitimate and was proven from the records of the earlier Bahamani Sultanate, where Shivaji’s ancestors(Sisodiyas) served and got fiefs.. the same Sisodiyas later became the clan of Bhosales along with a sub-clan called Ghorpades. This claim was bolstered when the complete lineage from Bahamani times to the previous times was traced and Coronation of Shivaji Maharaj took place
@Rupesh Thakare yes
Absolutely right
Fake lol shivaji maharaj was kurmi. 96 kuli itself came after original marathas. First all were known as mawalas. Sisodiya rajput ka claim liya tha but wasn't rajput and moreover history of shivaji maharaj is written far later after the 2nd coronation 🤣🤣🤣
@@zorathus2229 Correct, that is the reason why Marathas got put in Reservation category in Maharashtra in 2019. Marathas are not Kshatriya Varna but Shudra Varna. The fake genealogy was created for Shivaji because the Chhatrapati religious ceremony can be done only for Kshatriyas, also Sisodia family were the only Rajputs who didn't intermarry with the Mughals.
Yes.
Many many thanks for the data and pdf
Hey, quick question about your charts:
How do you handle a child dying in child birth? Do you list it or do you skip it?
Can you also look at some more south indian dynasties. Like vijayanagara, wodeyars, chola, kittur etc...? It's a real delight to know the history from your charts.
Thank You For this Video ❤️
My grandfather told me we were from *Shinde* dynasty who settle in South part of Maharashtra near Solapur. Earlier our surname was also *Shinde* but eventually changed to *Ligade* . Though people in our area still use *Sardar* before our name.
Thank you so much
Tq for uploading free PDF 😊
Thank you for the information, just noticed at 08:25 the years mentioned below Baji Rao (1720-1740) is his reign, and at 09:55 Madhav Rao(1774-95) his lifespan is given
Bcoz Madhavrao was given Peshwai at 40th day of his birth and he reigned till hi death.
Excellent. Thanks.
Next could you maybe do a family tree of Irish High Kings?
It would be a tough one to do as the high kings would come from many different houses (clans).
Its also tough to know when the Irish monarchy started so it would be easiest to big somewhere like 6th century or 8th century or whatever.
Just to add....
Ireland WAS a single nation back then contrary to one of your previous vidoes,
there was a single high king,
a single language, culture and religion,
A single law,
And the Irish identity in Ireland back then.
Only thing is the system was very strange and unique to otehr counties.
Simply explained....
At the top of the pyramid was the "Brehon Law". The laws of Ireland. No-one could change the laws and they were in place for hundreds and hundreds of years.
Then was the High King, he had little to no proven power but nonethless was the most powerful person.
Then was the four petty kings who ruled their small regions under the high kings, there was occasionally infighting between these kings and the high king was also one of these four regional kings.
Then there was the cheiftans of the clans, there were many clans with the petty king of the region being part of the most powerful clan in his region. These clans often infought with each other to become more powerful.
It was a very strange amd complicated system so I wouldn't expect that in the possible video at all but its just to explain.
Great information ... Keep it up
Sad to see this coming from a foreigner rather than our own people.. Kudos to you mate good work 👍
Great work team👍
Thanks for the chart ❤️👍
A slave from Africa
Became a King in India
In his army was a Sardar
Whose Grandson initiated an Empire
An Empire that later ruled the whole of India
This is so fascinating ❤
Greatest comment.
Awesome work 🙏
Best video..
Thanks for the great information 👍
Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ki jay ❤️
Thank you so much for this video Lot of respect...Ek Maratha Lakh Maratha...🚩🚩🚩
Please Work towards being a Hindu and don't divide yourself with caste and creed.
Thanks for covering dynasties maratha empire!
greetings from india!
Technically, Madhavrao Scindia's mother is from a Nepali noble house, but not the royal house. The Rana dynasty were hereditary Prime Ministers during the Nepali monarchy era. The royal house was the Shah dynasty.
Thank you so so so much
Chattrapati wasn't rajput he claimed as rajput but wasnt.
GREAT 👍
Really useful
Wonderful Job🔥❤️❤️, Love from a Maratha❤️🔥
Bhut aache video hai. Hum apke charts ko use karenge.
Very nice video.We will use your charts surely.
Absolutely mind blowing channel 🙌🌏 millions of times better than any history books in the world 👏🏽👏🏽❤️ thank you 🙏
Great video.
Valuable contribution to Indian History, Maratha Empire. This land is called the land
of gold. Thank you Sir.
Very useful Video ...shows deep effort and study .even small things have not been skipped.....
There is a bit of inaccuracy. Early and later mughal rule was pretty brutal, only Akbar, jahangir and shah jahan to some extent were considered somewhat tolerant, further the earlier Islamic sultante was along with nearly all of early islamic invasions were quite horrific as well. Some say it was the bloodiest of invasions.
The royal titles were abolished in 1971. So, technically from 1947 to 1971, they were the equivalent of mediatised houses
Being Maratha I love you provided pdf and you have done great worked
Jai shivray 🚩🚩
Neat!
Awesome vid, you should do a vid of a series of vids about all the current pretenders in the world
Collaboration of 3 channels!!!
Wow
Great
Marathas, Gupta, Ashoka, Maurya, Harsha💪 pride of India.
So where are gehlots rana sisodiya chandel bundel kalchuri parmar rajput katoch porus gaur sen kshatriya rajputra chauhan solanki chalukya rajput and prathihar rajputs
Thanks for the Video ... Love from Maharashtra ♥️❤️
love the subdued images of the pictures of the monarchs
You missed Bhosale's of Tanjavar and another maratha Confederacy Holkar's of Indore.
@Rupesh Thakare Lol.... descendant of "Anaji"claiming to be Kshyatriya...😂😂😂
@Rushabh Thakare. kahi Pan Naka Bolu
Congrats! U know better than average Indian 🔥 Such an informative video
osm video thanks sir ❤
As far as the family tree of the Bhosle dynasty is concerned, the video is absolutely correct when speaking of the process of adoption. There is a litany of situations where uncles adopt their nephews, ie their sister's son. This would also bring prominence to the family that the sister was married into. Some were even descendants of Shivaji's granduncle. There is a palace called the New Palace in Kolhapur where the Bhosle family still lives but the entire ground floor has been converted into a museum. There one can see the family tree in its entirety. It is so long and convoluted that it will make your head spin!
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)