Canon FD 70-210mm F4 Review - The BEST Telephoto Lens for $50

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 609

  • @MustafaAlNuaimi
    @MustafaAlNuaimi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +128

    One of the coolest styles of TH-cam videos .. the cuts, the multi song soundtrack and general change of tones mid video makes for a great cinematic experience. 😌
    As for the lens: All I can get in my country is Minolta zooms... I will be searching for those.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Thank you kindly sir. Music changing is a huge key to giving the overall impression of movement to the narrative. You can use it for simple reviews or more complex content.
      I have a rule in everything I cut that it needs to be dynamic. Information needs to be moving forward along with the visuals. :)
      I’m going to get into that shortly; just need an interesting way to visually represent and articulate that to help understanding.
      Minolta lenses are good lenses. :)

    • @MustafaAlNuaimi
      @MustafaAlNuaimi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MarkHoltze can't wait 🤲

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He's been reported to the authorities for this.

  • @macczar7694
    @macczar7694 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I have been playing around with this lens, adapted to my new m100, and am so impressed with its capability. I found it in my late grandfathers camera bag 3 or so years ago, and it makes something of sentimental value feel even more valuable then ever. I didn’t even realize it had a true macro feature until you showed me in this video! Thank you

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Sentimental connection, perfect! I love that. You look through the lens and you can for a moment, see the world as he did. Glad you found value with the video mate, all the best on your journey with the lens!

    • @thedehwehfamily3943
      @thedehwehfamily3943 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s a good adapter for canon m200

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lunacy.

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@thedehwehfamily3943
      No. You don't try to reinvent camera equipment.
      You buy the matching camera body for it.

  • @bobceffo
    @bobceffo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you were right again.
    bought this lens with a "just in case, whatever..." attitude.
    It's now always with me for gigs, just in case I need that reach.
    damn easy to focus, sharp...
    Yes, I will update it with a fast, modern thing, one day.
    but no hurry. this bad boy still delivers. And it came for peanuts

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Heck yes mate!

  • @MarkHoltze
    @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    With the whole mirrorless systems coming out full speed, I suspect these old vintage lenses are going to see new light. I got this for $50 and the modern F4 Canon equivalent is $600. $1700 for the Sony 70-200 F4. That kind of price delta can keep a lot of people from experiencing this range of photography which isn’t a good thing.
    My favorite thing about these vintage lenses is being able to experiment with focal lengths, see what ones you love and what ones you don’t. They can help with how you decide to purchase the more expensive gear down the line. PS: The thumbnail was shot with an adapted 60 year old C Mount Kern-Pillard SWITAR 25mm 1.4
    **EDIT: Thanks "who's there" for pointing out this lens is in fact METAL! He's just increased the value for me even though I was hell bent convinced it definitely wasn't lol. Thank you mate! Much appreciate it!

    • @cpgr19
      @cpgr19 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I totally agree, the whole FD lineup is awesome and easilly competes with all modern lenses at a fraction of the cost..Also i think that these lenses give a more vintage look to the images which looks great!

    • @filmrollstroll2003
      @filmrollstroll2003 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those Kern Paillard lenses are nice to work with !

  • @johnherzel718
    @johnherzel718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’ve had this lens since late eighties/early nineties with my A1. It was always my favorite. I was always amazed at how nice the results were and how easy push pull zooms are to use. I still adapt it today.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s awesome! Probably got some great shots with it in all that time as well!

    • @marlonbrando5342
      @marlonbrando5342 ปีที่แล้ว

      How easy is it to focus as you zoom?

    • @johnherzel718
      @johnherzel718 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@marlonbrando5342 The lens is easy to focus and zoom. It is close to par focal (it stays somewhat in focus) as you zoom, so only sometimes is a minor post zoom focus adjustment required. The closer you are focusing the more the lens needs to be adjusted. But it's never more than 1/8 turn in my usage. Once your subject is about 20 feet away it's likely to be actually par focal.
      If it isn't, it's very close.
      It really is a nice lens, and very easy to love. Just remember to keep your shutter speeds above 1/250 if hand held. The bokeh is very nice as well ❤️‍🩹

  • @ajm92cr
    @ajm92cr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Unreal video quality Mark! Looks like a fragment from a tv network show.
    Great work, and thanks for the review, short, sweet and covering the important aspects!
    Keep it up!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Late reply !! I’m so sorry. Never saw the notification for this post. Thank you kindly my friend, apologies for the late reply.

  • @andrewmercado60
    @andrewmercado60 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I inherited this lens from my gramps along with his AE-1! Love it

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice! AE-1 is a great camera! Any other FD lenses?

    • @andrewmercado60
      @andrewmercado60 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze There was an NFD 50m 1.8 but it was damaged. Replaced that with a 1.4 just last week and now working on the first roll! Solid lens. The build quality is way better than my Rebel SL2 kit lens. Don't make em like they used to

  • @21Swayzee
    @21Swayzee 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sweet review! That is a lot of lens for 50 bucks! Ton of fun to be part of the fist pump collab with you on Eh Joe! Way to go vintage too! Looking forward to being part of this community, always fun to connect with another canuck! Way to give er!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks man! That was petty cool collaboration heheh. Thanks for stopping by and welcome!

  • @ghosttownsentinel5288
    @ghosttownsentinel5288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for a comprehensive review of this lens. I snagged one for $19 USD on eBay within 5 minutes of watching this video. The lens was certified in excellent condition by a reputable camera dealer in the American South. Your test shots show this one to be formidably close in acuity, bokeh and excellence to the later versions of the 70-200mm USM f/4 L. I see why the pooch lunged to grab the lens out of your hand at the start of the video!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks mate, I was wrong about it being plastic, it’s totally metal. Just a lighter more flexible kind than the Tak. But I’m seriously impressed with this lens for the value. The macro ability is the icing. I just love doing these lens reviews I don’t know what it is. A Ig portion is wanting to showcase them for strong prices of photographic gear they still are after all these years. Talk a about bang for buck.
      You got a great deal on yours. Let me know how it works out for you. Glad the review helped mate. All the best.

  • @worldadventuretravel
    @worldadventuretravel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I recently picked up the earlier 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 for my Canon 70D. Other than the barrel sliding straight out to 210mm as soon as I tilt the camera (no barrel lock, boooo) I'm really happy with the image quality. It's softer than modern lenses wide open, but tack sharp if you stop it down. Even the soft look is still in focus, but with that vintage lens character. The color rendering errs warm, which I personally prefer, and blues and greens are pretty vivid. Stick a CPL filter on it and you'll have game-changing color saturation and quality straight in-camera.

  • @cymrocanuck
    @cymrocanuck 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video review! I picked up one of these lenses in 2002 for about $15 from a Tokyo junk store. It was in great condition and I used it a lot when I was still shooting film. I now use a Sony a3000 camera and it does well on that when I remember that I still have it.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Peter. Ya I was actually pretty surprised how much I use this lens. Crazy you could sell it for 75% more than you bought it for all these years later. The crop sensor would give you that extra focal range! Pretty good stuff mate! Thankful for those mirrorless cameras bringing these lenses back to the forefront.

  • @SeanAndersonMedia
    @SeanAndersonMedia 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You convinced me Mark. Just bought one to compliment my 28mm and 50mm Canon FD collection.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a good one, for that price. I hear the Zeiss 80-200 tops this but comes in a bit more $$$$ and doesn’t have macro. The FD looks so good on the Sony right? ;)

  • @lifelessl8925
    @lifelessl8925 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    You have picked my Curiosity until the end of this video. Such a good review.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s always a huge accomplishment! I wanted to keep this shorter and tried pretty hard (I cut a bunch of stuff). I always over shoot, but hoping to keep the pace manageable.
      Always have a blast shooting these. Thanks for the feedback!

  • @shelliecarlson7015
    @shelliecarlson7015 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I picked mine up when I thrifted the gorgeous AV-1 it was attached to. Didn't think much about the lens except it was very clean and I could also use it on my AE-1 Program.
    You have opened my eyes to what a find I stumbled upon.
    Great video, thanks.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s so cool to hear. 100% my intention. To showcase the potential of these llenses.

  • @cls606
    @cls606 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    New subscriber mark! I have been very inspired by you and a select few other youtubers doing high quality reviews and tutorials for us budding videographers. Keep doing what you do, we are learning 🙏.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks mate! I appreciate you taking the time to watch and comment. New video dropping tomorrow so stay tuned. Go into the adapting a bit more.
      If you have any questions or anything about this or what you would like to see. I’m all ears. Thanks again Dominic.

  • @rodrrico
    @rodrrico 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hands down, one of the best lens reviews I have seen on youtube! Your in depth analysis is second to none. I do have one question though, are you able to shoot slowmo (60 or 120fps) with steady shot on with the FD lens? I could be crossing my wires, but I was under the impression that you can't do that with steadyshot on?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Damn man that’s a huge compliment! Thanks! To answer your question, you definitely can get steady slow mo with an FD lens. The seagull was hand held 120fps, I’ll admit it takes a steady hand, holding breath and a good stance. The pump action zoom is so smooth once you get it going it’s easy to keep smooth. Practice definitely helps, plus sensor stabilization ;)

  • @theyolobro6343
    @theyolobro6343 ปีที่แล้ว

    I gotta say, this is the first video I've watched of you. But I must say, this is one of the best intros I've ever seen on any TH-cam video, the shots are perfect, the light blue light is a beautiful touch, the music is perfect for some odd reason, and the volume of the music in comparison to your voice is beautiful, not too loud, not too quiet, your voice is still very clear through the music yet its still there, sorry for the long comment but, it's such a perfect into I had to say somthing

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  ปีที่แล้ว

      No apologies mate; appreciate you leaving your thoughts! Had some fun with this one, glad you enjoyed it!

  • @RATIBRAJAB
    @RATIBRAJAB 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your reviews for lenses is like a treasure for my new project that I will talk to you later stay tuned.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looking forward mate!

  • @SergeGolikov
    @SergeGolikov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this lens on my GH5, had it sitting on my shelf for years, now it has a new life and the quality is quite amazing.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s pretty good! Was using it today for some
      Snipe shots :)

    • @SergeGolikov
      @SergeGolikov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze Postscript: We all should actually distinguish between proper Zoom and Varifocal lenses when describing optics.
      This is in fact a vari-focal Pull/Twist or 2 touch lens, as opposed to a proper Zoom lens which is one touch and tracks (or should) focus.
      Just sayin 😎

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya but these are photo lenses built before video was ever intentionally used as such. If I’m looking at a proper video zoom lens is when you bring up these factors. You’re not wrong at all, but for me it’s a time and place and an attempt to keep these relatively contained info wise.

  • @TechGearTalk
    @TechGearTalk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic video Mark. Incredible info and beautifully shot/edited. Well done!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. I’m just dropped a comment on your slider video at the exact time you posted this it was weird as I hit enter and got your notification of comment lol.
      Thought for a second I was commenting on my own wall.

    • @TechGearTalk
      @TechGearTalk 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Holtze had the same experience 🤣😂

  • @jgarcia8776
    @jgarcia8776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im building up a collection of FD lenses, and ahh im excited, I cant wait to use these.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which ones do you have so far?

  • @machousemedia
    @machousemedia 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought this lens for my BMPCC4k. For the price, you can’t go wrong. The first few shots look amazing. Can’t wait to shoot more. Thanks for the great review.

  • @supranomicon
    @supranomicon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Many thanks, picked one of these up for £25- brilliant!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a steal! £25!!! Nice!

  • @btrdangerdan2010
    @btrdangerdan2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Mark. This lens was my workhorse when I used it at the Miramar airshow recently in September.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ohhhh! I was away during the Toronto air show so I missed it, but I REALLY wanted to get some shots so when I DID do a video I would have been able to use them. Do you shoot with a tripod when you're doing airshow stuff?

    • @btrdangerdan2010
      @btrdangerdan2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Holtze I should use a tripod, but to answer your question no I hand hold the camera and try to use fast shutter speeds I’m Tv mode on my Canon T90 to compensate for the hand holding. It was even worse when I mounted the lens in a Canon FD x2 B teleconverter lens the shake is even more.

    • @btrdangerdan2010
      @btrdangerdan2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I guess I don’t have time to track the subject (airplane) on a tripod, the planes can be anywhere and I have to be ready for the action when I hold the camera.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya, they're all over the place, I guess if you're snapping stills and it's a bright sunny day you should be fine, shooting video would be tough without a tripod that zoomed in for sure.

  • @oshidipe
    @oshidipe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    haha! yes! yes! you peaked my curiosity with those slick b-roll. Awesome review Mark!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha, I prefer it to my talking mug lol. Thanks Wilson! Had fun making this.

    • @oshidipe
      @oshidipe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze Had fun watching as well. lol. A quick question though, what has been your experience using this lens for Portraits (assuming you've used it for that purpose) ? On a scale of 1-10, what would be your rating in that regard. Thanks

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I haven’t done too many with it, but I took some great family shots from a distance with it that are cool. Nice compressed background. I prefer faster primes when taking portraits personally, but this lens gave me no issue.

    • @oshidipe
      @oshidipe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze oh, okay. Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure mate. These lenses are good all around, you have to work them a bit more (manual focus) but it’s all part of the craft and beauty. Your pictures will change forever I promise you that. All those macro shots were taken with a $100 100mm vintage Macro F4. My last video was shot almost entirely on vintage lenses that cost less than a single modern one.
      Modern is great, but saving up for one takes away a lot of learning you can be doing on these.

  • @paulm8157
    @paulm8157 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👍Captivating vid. Lens has super color rendition. Barrel shows little wear. Etched lens markings have added plus of enabling character restoration by applying white marking like Sharpie or dry erase marker, followed by a wipe. Good call out of lens mount differences - might affect expectations about automated adapters. Af and IS, plus auto EXIF recordations of today's lenses have spoiled us.
    Re in-camera FL setting for IS, too easy to forget to reset when zooming -- might help to assign to custom button. Re MF, do you use peaking? If so, what "thickness" - peaking can be tricky sometimes? Might make a good vid especially for the vintage lenses. LR also has us applying lens corrections manually. A how to vid that takes in all of this vintage lens adaptation stuff would also be useful and show the tradeoffs. Hope you enjoyed the turkey.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Paul, thanks for the wonderful comment. You always leave such great ones I enjoy reading them. First off, the Turkey's were great I was lucky enough to have three of them, my parents Saturday, ours on Sunday and my inlaw's on Monday (where I shot this video). Well technically I shot it Sunday (on camera talking head) and monday (everything else).
      Thanks for the tips on restoration, those will be helpful for sure as I'm sure I won't be as gentle on them as the last owner was (although I'm trying).
      The custom button thing is done, I didn't feature it here because it's a very sony specific feature I think. I guess all of them have it. I map the focal length to a wheel so I can change it on the fly, up rolls them up, down rolls them down. Pretty straight forward. I'm rarely shooting zoom/telephto without some sort of stabilization so I don't rely on it TOO heavily. I use very deliberate and delicate hand movements/practice repeat to get it, all while holding my breath. Kind of like I imagine a sniper would, minus the killing part ;).
      Some really great tips for future videos, I don't feel my level of LR is worthy of tutorial though, I'll have to step up that game. I'm not a huge photo editor, it's something I want to do more of.
      Thanks again Paul!

  • @BrennanMartin
    @BrennanMartin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video man. I have this lens too and I love it. I converted the lens to ef along with an old Canon 35-105 f3.5 FD. And they both have macro modes! Love em. Keep up the good work, and if you want a shooting partner in Toronto lemme know!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Brennan. Appreciate that man! It's crazy how these old lenses had both macro and telephoto. I wonder what the overall compromise there was that they don't do that anymore.

    • @BrennanMartin
      @BrennanMartin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it's probably a mix of them adding more specific elements to keep things sharper at wider apertures and the idea that they could do a better job with dedicated macro lenses (or make more money).

  • @rinusworldzm
    @rinusworldzm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm starting to love the canon FD lenses. I have Pentacon Praktica lenses and I'm thinking of mixing the 2. Yeah I think I'll have both PB and FD lenses.
    Great video Mark. Awesome footage.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FD's are fantastic, there's a reason they're still loved by many and even picked up and used by many DP's working in the commercial space. FD's are one of the most popular lenses to be modded for cinema and they're quite at home in front of a RED or ARRI cinema camera.
      Thanks so much for stopping by mate, which FD's do you currently have?

    • @rinusworldzm
      @rinusworldzm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze I currently don't have any FD lenses. The stuff I'm seeing online done with them is really beautiful. I do have Pentacon Praktica lenses. Set of 4. 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8, 30-70mm f3.5-4.5 and 135mm f2.8

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rinusworldzm Love Pentacon lenses! My first adapted one was my grandfather's. My dad's Praktica still works too! :)

    • @rinusworldzm
      @rinusworldzm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze oh wooooowwww!!! That's awesome. These are literally my first lenses everrrrrr. I'm loving the feel of them I can't test them yet because I haven't bought my camera yet but I want to get the original Blackmagic Pocket or the 2.5k cinema camera. I'm leaning more to the 2.5k. The 4K is put of my budget range but I'm not mad at the options I have.
      How would you say the Pentacons compare to canon FDs? And how's the picture out of the Praktica?

  • @lwgl_xyz
    @lwgl_xyz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An alternative option:
    Pentacon built a similar, yet smaller one (cost me 40€ in mint condition), the build quality is slightly cheaper, its minimum focus distance is ~85cm and macro ratio is 1:4.
    Look for “Pentacon 70-210mm f4“, some where sold under the “Pentavision“ brand name. It has an m42 mount, so the Adapter is easier to use than the canon FD one.
    I use mine regularly with an m42 2x focal length converter, image quality is still good.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love a good Pentacon myself! Thanks mate!

  • @TylerCinema
    @TylerCinema 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    DAYYYYYUM This video is crisp! The music is so dope too Love it!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Tyler! Ya the music, I heard that song and it inspired the whole opening. How can I give this a TRON look...I kind of like how it turned out.

  • @Analogbrain
    @Analogbrain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A really great video, Mark! I've been looking for this lens for some years, and I finally found one today, in excellent condition. It's a bit special for me, because I had one, but it got lost in a car accident, a long time ago.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome mate! Enjoy it!

  • @SneekeeMonkee
    @SneekeeMonkee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subscribed!
    Starting to get into video and re-re-building my vintage lens kit. Stumbled across how beautiful these FD lenses render. Great review

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Jim! Careful, it's addictive!!

  • @BlackWarriorLures
    @BlackWarriorLures 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like using the 70mm macro function to shoot by fly tying videos. I understand why some people might not like it but, man, it's versatile. There isn't a better deal out there.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed! Not a better deal, given the price and how you can use it, I find it hard for anyone to say with a straight face it’s not a good lens. I would love to compare it to the Sony 70-200 G series F4, maybe one day if I can get a loaner lens.

    • @BlackWarriorLures
      @BlackWarriorLures 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MarkHoltze Not only that, you'd have top buy 5 primes to match this thing, lol!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly!

  • @infinite2246
    @infinite2246 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Finally!
    A quality video!!!
    Awsome editing, keep it up!)👊🔥

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I need to do these old lenses justice :)

  • @georgestancl2283
    @georgestancl2283 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the cinematics of this video. Such a good job

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks George, the goal is to shoot these things in interesting ways. It’s more time consuming, but I think the effort is worth it.

  • @timskinnercanada
    @timskinnercanada 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Once again Mr. Holtze does not disappoint. I really appreciate all the effort you go to, to make these videos such a pleasure to watch. It does not go unnoticed. That’s a beautiful lens. I don’t have one of those. Is it reasonably sharp?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Tim! It is sharp, I'm really happy with it, especially because it gives me an 85-100-135 and 200mm PLUS MACRO on one lens. Of course it's not as fast as my primes but it makes up for it in not having to switch out lenses lol.
      I honestly only really bought it because it was so cheap (wanted to split the shipping cost for my 35mm F2 as well) so wasn't super stoked on the lens until i opened it and held it. When i put it on and started shooting with it, I was sold. Plus I wanted a zoom, but was considering the Carl Zeiss 80-200 ($250-$300 online) but wasn't feeling the price point. $50 was an easy sell and got me 10mm extra plus macro ;)

  • @crownborne
    @crownborne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude you are a master in editing and story telling, great job!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow, thanks for that vote of confidence my friend! I blame these old lenses, they bring it out in me. 🙏

    • @crownborne
      @crownborne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze being worthy of using the greats is experience and practice, your fisheye 14mm review is also super dope, loved all your videos so far!

  • @corgis6801
    @corgis6801 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a Kiron f4.5 70-210mm in mint condition for $20 recently and I have been amazed at how useful it is! The image quality at f4.5 is not good but it lets in more light then modern zooms and the thin DOF is amazing. When used in macro at 210mm the DOF shrinks to almost nothing which is a lot of fun for creative photos. At f8 the lens was able to create some super sharp portraits even on a crop sensor. On a full frame camera it would probably be much sharper and for $20 nothing can top that value for money!

  • @paulyd8291
    @paulyd8291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got this, a FD 35mm f2 (!!!), and 28mm f2.8 at a yard sale for $15. These vintage lenses are amazing.

  • @squirreldemon3506
    @squirreldemon3506 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this video convinced me to buy the lens. I got one that looked almost brand new and im loving it so far. I wanted a telephoto for landscapes but didn't have the thousands to spend on sony lenses. This is sharp across all apertures and I love that its at f4 even at 210mm. compared to my old 55-210 sony, this lens is so much better.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would actually like to get my hands on the Sony 70-200 F4 just to do a side by side comparison. What a lens that costs 33x more gets you. In the summer gojng to see if I can rent one.

    • @squirreldemon3506
      @squirreldemon3506 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze that's awesome! I'd love to see a review of the switar 25mm f1.4. That seems like a really good budget astro lens

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@squirreldemon3506 It's coming mate! I can't wait to do that one! I have a few more videos i'm doing before (I like to do a lens test and a few more in between) just to mix it up a bit.
      It will be the next lens I test! Thanks mate. You're right about Astro, i never even thought about it...thanks for that suggestion mate!

    • @squirreldemon3506
      @squirreldemon3506 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze can't wait!

  • @unicornone196
    @unicornone196 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your content is unbelievable, thank you!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      /humbled. Thanks unicorn one! I enjoy producing it as well as helping spread the love for these old lenses.
      Thanks for your comment!

  • @xanfus
    @xanfus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just ordered the vivitar version. It's an f3.5 and I'm really looking forward to slapping it on my gh5.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's awesome! Let me know how you like it! Going to get some serious range on your GH5 with the full frame tele!

    • @xanfus
      @xanfus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze I've actually got a focal reducer to use with it. That would be way too long for my tastes with the 2x crop factor lol.

  • @MUENTERMEDIA
    @MUENTERMEDIA 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done Mark! Your videos are always inspiring, good job!

  • @khaledbinobaid4355
    @khaledbinobaid4355 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey man! already watched this video like 5-6 times and I gotta say I fall in love with your stuff with every video I watch! I was wondering if you could make a video showing how you shoot your b-roll, like how you set your tripod, what tripod head you use and some common techniques would be cool. I find that this is a subject youtubers barely scratch the surface of, whereas shooting attractive b-roll is basically indispensable for a good looking video. also, do make more editing tutorials. and lastly, it was relieving that you find 'video-making fun' cause you make awesome videos! Keep 'em coming!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey mate believe me I have all these ideas floating around and I WILL get to them. I'm trying to take advantage of outdoor stuff while the outdoors is still nice, soon will be under a blanket of snow and all the pretty leaves will be gone so trying to do all my outside stuff as much as possible.
      B-Roll is definitely a topic I want to cover, it's not even just about the setup...more importantly it's about what's motivating it. It's like putting two puzzle pieces together, the visuals are illustrating what the words are saying in an asethetically pleasing way is always a challenge.
      I will say that for this, a MACRO lens comes in handy. Like it's probably my second used lens and won't leave home without it hehehe. The one I use here is a $100 SMC 100mm Takumar F4. But i can get into all that.
      Editing same thing.
      Appreciate your comments mate, you've got some nice incite that can help me navigate what stuff to do.
      Appreciate it.

    • @khaledbinobaid4355
      @khaledbinobaid4355 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze ayee thanks mate! much appreciated.

  • @BuffFam
    @BuffFam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was getting bumped about the price of the canon 70-200mm, but this has me stoked! No image stabilization will be a challenge, but nothing some creative thinking can't fix!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Creating thinking for sure! Also IBIS if you have it? ;) Creative thinking always leads to cooler results. It's a motivator vs a crutch to lean on!
      Good luck dude!

  • @ABeginnersGuideTo
    @ABeginnersGuideTo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Dude. This is amazing

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks CJ, appreciate it mate. Was fun to do, so glad that translated.

  • @photog1529
    @photog1529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have quite a bit of Canon FD lenses from my early shooting days, and they get quite a bit of use on my Sony full frame mirrorless. I haven't tried this particular lens yet...I've been using my Canon FD80-200L/4 (yes, Canon had 'L' lenses back in the day), and a Vivitar 70-210/3.5 Series 1. May have to look for a copy of the FD70-210 for, well, just because...

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have the L, this might disappoint a bit. I was looking at the L, it's not a bad price online vs the other FD L lenses! That FD 24mm F1.4 L YIKES!

  • @lancemcwilson7347
    @lancemcwilson7347 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought one for my Panasonic GH5 because of your sweet video. Thanks!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hopefully it works out! On that crop frame your going to have some range! Unless you have a focal reducer?

    • @lancemcwilson7347
      @lancemcwilson7347 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze I am curious what the crop will be. Its shipping from Japan so I will have to wait. At least 140 - 420? I suppose. I just picked up a simple adapter. I didn`t pick up a focal reducer yet. Do you have any recommendations on a focal reducer?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it’s a 2.2 crop on micro. I haven’t played with reducers as I’m all full frame but I’ve seen lots of happy micro 4/3 users who love them to get that native crop down.

  • @JonathanBradysouth-africa
    @JonathanBradysouth-africa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best feature of this lens has to be the push/pull zoom ability of the ring. Literally blew my mind!

  • @itsxandr
    @itsxandr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have this lens and it really is pretty versatile, but would love it even more if it was a bit sharper but for that cheap it's a good deal even if it's a little soft like most fd lenses.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya, the Contax Carl Zeiss Which is about $200 more is tack sharp. 80-200 F4, no macro.

  • @mugshot749
    @mugshot749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Canon changed to polymer lens barrels because the material is much lighter than metal if you are carrying a bag full of lenses , and they coated the bearing surfaces in the focusing helicoids with Teflon to make the focusing and zoom smooth.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brilliant info mate thanks! Ya I realized after publishing it wasn’t plastic but screwed my self for life on this one lol. Don’t un verify anything before stating, that’s the motto.

    • @mugshot749
      @mugshot749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze
      At the time they changed to polymer barrels I complained to the national sales manager of Canon ( who was a friend of mine ) about the change and he said " the Canon Corporation are convinced that polymer is a better material ".
      I'm a retired news agency photographer and I have fifteen new type FD lenses I made my living with for more than twenty years that I'm still using, and they have always worked flawlessly.

  • @LayilaFaon
    @LayilaFaon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow this looks really awesome with this lense!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s pretty fantastic...legitimately impressed. Thanks Layila.

  • @mikelyndin5897
    @mikelyndin5897 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are amazing, and I learn more and more from you. Btw i recently bought that lens for my 6d mark ii.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How does it work on the mark ii?

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use this beauty on an Olympus EM10 Mark II (M43) with a speedbooster, which adds one stop of aperture. With the x0,7 factor from the speedboster, I have an equivalent of a 100-300mm telephoto lens. I paid mine $100 (shipping included) on ebay and the thing is in mint condition. Yes, some chromatic aberrations appear sometimes, but I easily fix it with RawTherapee (free and open software).

  • @nikkipedro
    @nikkipedro 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh thanks Mark, great video yet again. I love your style. You are inspirational, so much so, I just bought a Canon FD 70-210 f4 in Melbourne, Australia. I have been trying to get a telephoto for my A7iii since I bought the camera but everything I stumble across is too much. I think I paid $10 more than you but I think I can manage that :) Thanks again.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Roro! Good find mate, I can't believe you got an A7III, they're nowhere to be found here, pretty much every camera shop has them on backorder. That camera is killing it right now. Great little camera that's for sure , I kind of want one.
      Let me know how you like the lens, it quickly grew on me. So nice having that telephoto range with constant aperture for pennies compared to the modern equivalent. I do want to get my hands on the Sony 70-200 F4 just for a side by side comparison.

  • @souldigital8148
    @souldigital8148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im a big fan of this lens too and one thing it does that a number of other zoom lenses of a similar age and price range do not seem to be able to do is resist fringing...

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re def not built for high resolution digital photography in that regard. Film is a little more forgiving in this area.

    • @fredriksvard2603
      @fredriksvard2603 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It does? It showed fringing in another video compared to an ef l lens, to the extent that it put me off buying it even at 50eur.

  • @jenniwelsh4545
    @jenniwelsh4545 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Lock and open markings on the adaptor are to allow you to either kick the aperture in place or adjust it.
    ....

  • @yemarican
    @yemarican 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super nice and neat tutorial! thank you for sharing this.

  • @xxl0o
    @xxl0o 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man you got style! Subscribed after 59 seconds watching! Well done)

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Eugene thanks mate. The 80's synth vibe on this one felt so appropriate since it's an 80's lens ;). Plus I had just got my neon light, a must for sure.
      Thanks for watching and the vote of confidence mate. Appreciate it!

  • @benjaminkaric2874
    @benjaminkaric2874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just got mine,ordered it the same day when I saw this video, got it for 50€ in mint original packaging, now I'm waiting for my adapter.

  • @AHumanInNature
    @AHumanInNature 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review as always Mark! Keep it up!

  • @cyclopemedias3718
    @cyclopemedias3718 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have the same lens , I use it on my Sony and I'm impressed every time I use it.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      it’s fantastic value for sure!

    • @maximedesjardins5014
      @maximedesjardins5014 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze if you like vintage lenses , you should try to find a vivitar 28mm f2 close focus komine (the 2 first digit of the serial number are 28) This lens is awesome! Its expensive but it woth it!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Putting it on the list! Thanks mate!

  • @CharlesR-x6d
    @CharlesR-x6d 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the 75-200mm...lens basicly..the same lense..Tamron absolutely an amazing lens that works

  • @mikelyndin5897
    @mikelyndin5897 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your content is really great. Love your videos🔥🔥🔥

  • @MoonSafariFilms
    @MoonSafariFilms 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just pulled the trigger on one of these bad boys on ebay. You got me!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me know how you like it. What camera are you using it with?

  • @trueaddict8733
    @trueaddict8733 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got this lens because of this video. Its one of my favorite lenses in my kit. I've always found the color rendition a bit lacking, at least on my camera, however the black and white is incredible. Thanks for this awesome recommendation!!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad it’s working for you mate! It’s pretty hard to go wrong with this one based on the price. Enjoy!

    • @trueaddict8733
      @trueaddict8733 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze couldn't agree more - I paid $18 for my copy and it looks brand new, like no one has ever used it. I basically stole the damn thing lol. I have about 40 lenses and I've used this lens probably more than any of the others. For the type of street photography I do, its perfect.

  • @GeoScape1109
    @GeoScape1109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Instant sub the quality is way to good for TH-cam

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s kind of you to say mate. Trying to showcase these old lenses in the best light ;)

  • @CartridgeMaster
    @CartridgeMaster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:07 those look like shots that would be in a horror film, it reminds me of that one jump scare TH-cam video the one with the car diving from far away

  • @marcosalbernas
    @marcosalbernas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have nothing but good things to say about your videos! Professionalism. Very particular the way to tell the story adding more value to the information. Keep up the good work. I already have this lens, but Can you suggest where to buy the 35mm Super Takumar?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Marcos, super cool of you to say mate! So sorry for the delay, I totally didn't get notification on this comment otherwise I would have been all over it.
      35mm Takumar, best place is ebay I think. Depends where you are in the world. There is a takumar facebook group and they often host buy/sell options there which is nice, because they're not out to gouge you.
      You looking for F2 or F3.5 version?

    • @marcosalbernas
      @marcosalbernas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze I have a few on my eBay watch list, I'm looking for the f2 (28mm or 35mm), but it is hard to find them in mint condition. I own some vintage lenses including Takumar all in pristine condition, trying to complete my collection LOL. Thanks for the advice.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marcosalbernas Those Takumars, what's with their condition. I'm not sure if it's a built quality thing or just people never used them, but it's really hard to find one of those in rough shape.
      Good luck with your search mate!

  • @Dedncide
    @Dedncide 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A friend of a friend sold me one for $20USD. I have it on my Canon FTql from 1966 and it works great! Not as sharp as my Zeiss 85 on my Sony though, but it's nice to have in a bag.

  • @gameon2000
    @gameon2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Top content Marc, instant sub! I have the same glass for Nikon mount (Vivitar / Tokina)

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! Thank you!

  • @joycesteen7869
    @joycesteen7869 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I found this lens at a second hand shop. I didn't realize it was an older lens. So it doesn't attach to my newer cannon. Could u tell me what camera it will fit?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It will fit any camera with the right adapter, it it works better on mirrorless. Sony, canon R, fujifilm etc. You need an adapter. FD to R if you have an RF mount (canon mirrorles) or FD to EOS for eF kens

  • @joshbryant1133
    @joshbryant1133 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just bought mine off of eBay. Will try out!

  • @chrlmlln9018
    @chrlmlln9018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear, Mark! A very big THANK to you for this well-done and also interesting review of this vintage lens from the past! It was nice to be reminded by you about this lens I have forgotten to use and that is collecting dust on my shelf.
    I am glad to see and listen to your examination of this lens that I happen to own and I had used it for many years ago, when being a manual camera photographer (w/ Canon F-1 new SLR).
    May I ask you, if you maybe have also stumbled upon a made in year 1985 "brother" lens with the famous red-ring , so called "L" lens: Canon New FD 80-200 mm f/4 L, and maybe you could add this lens to your kit, a lens with superior IQ almost a miracle lens. The Canon FD 80-200mm f4L was one of the last L series lenses to be developed for Canon FD cameras as shortly after launch Canon moved towards the new EF / EOS mount cameras. This lens offers true L series performance in a reasonably compact format, as you already have commented about this compactness and easy handle. Wishing you all the very best and stay blessed, safe and healthy during these perilous times we living in now! Best Regards from Sweden!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks mate! That L sounds like a dream lens! Hold onto that! I don't use vintage zoom's all too often, but might keep an eye open for one. I'll definitely put up a review of it if it happens though :)

  • @djmarzek
    @djmarzek 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video! Thanks Mark!
    SALUDOS!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Almost a year ago now wow! This video always makes me want some apple pie ;)

  • @melvinch
    @melvinch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should try the Kiron 70-210mm F4 (w/focus lock and zoom-lock). Its central sharpness surpassed those from camera manufacturers in those days.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Focus LOCK would be amazing! It's the only problem with these old zooms you have to pull or push and at the same time gently focus if using for video. Focus lock would remove the need for that, focus and just worry about the smoothness of the zoom.

    • @melvinch
      @melvinch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze Kiron has a high reputation back in the 80s. They made no bad lens and what they made are still highly sought after. At some period, Vivitar S1 lenses were made by Kiron.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@melvinch Melvin! Thanks so much for that info! I'm going to look into them!

    • @melvinch
      @melvinch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MarkHoltze Don't forget about Tamron SP series as well. Tamron was the king of 3rd-party lens back then with gems like the 90mm F2.5 and 70-210mm F3.5 constant aperture.

    • @AD98.
      @AD98. 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@melvinch How's the tamron adaptall-2 80-210mm f/3.8-4?

  • @gregjoblove672
    @gregjoblove672 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mmmmmm tasty review! Keep it up!! I’m probably going to buy it.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Greg, ya if you can find one for a good price GO!

  • @DanielPeacocke
    @DanielPeacocke 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really want to pick one of these up now! Only thing is I hear FD to EF adapters make the quality just tank. :( I mean. It's cheap, so I might as well anyways!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's that "pro" adapter I think you're talking about. It puts a lens between your lens and your sensor an I agree it's not the greatest. The Canon R should actually remedy this problem making Canon cameras have zero issues with mirrorless. I've asked Fotodiox and they said they are making an adapter for it. I think that's the only thing that really excites me about Canon's new camera is that I'll be able to mount all my vintage lenses on it without a problem. (I'm not getting it, but if I were).
      What camera do you have?

    • @DanielPeacocke
      @DanielPeacocke 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use a GH5 with a Metabones XL. So I want to try adapt it to EF for the metabones. but it seems they all have the glass element. If it comes down to it, I will just adapt it straight to the native m43 mount! The search continues for a good FD to EF for the metabones tho!

  • @jgarcia8776
    @jgarcia8776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video gives off Ahoy vibes, love it.

  • @ibelieveincolor
    @ibelieveincolor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I enjoyed watching this!
    Got this lens yesterday and now waiting for the converter to my sony :p After seeing this video almost can't wait (but will have to :p)

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a fun lens! I know all too well about wait. Hope it comes soon!

  • @ftlbaby
    @ftlbaby 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've watched 10,638 vintage lens videos and yours is the one that convinced me to actually buy! I just ordered one of these 70-210mm lenses from ebay for $50USD ; ) The only reservation I have is the 4 foot MFD. So I watched another 3,591 adapter videos before ordering the Fotodiox DLX Stretch for my A7R II. (Incidentally, the adapter cost almost twice the lens cost.) It lowers the minimum focus distance! Have you used one of those? And can you believe how many different kinds of adapters there is!?!?!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I haven’t used that one! Just the FD to NEX lol. I do have the fotodiox PL to L and it was $150, but that’s cheap for an PL to L

  • @Bigdude0444
    @Bigdude0444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:43 The rain touching the camera and lens hurts my soul.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't worry, it can handle a little rain ;)

  • @dutchvideoshooter
    @dutchvideoshooter 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I had 2 of them sold them :) I had the 35-105 f3.5 sold it too. Didnt like them both.
    Now only FD primes for my I have a full kit of 17 to 300mm.
    you should check out the 100-300 f5.6 too. I sold it but When i shot with it I liked it :)

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have a 17mm as well! Dang! Big camera vintage sale tomorrow here in Toronto, I'm going to keep my eye open for some FD primes! I have the 24 2.8, but I would love a 17. I doubt I'll find one as they're pretty rare, but the thrill of the hunt and and all! Thanks!

    • @MUENTERMEDIA
      @MUENTERMEDIA 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      good luck Mark! ;-) I guess if you find something, we will get a new video, right =)

  • @ravensatodds
    @ravensatodds 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video as always Mark. Wondering if you’ve encountered a bright haze in the centre of the image. Seen a few reviews of this lens with this problem

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks mate! I haven’t noticed any personally. What camera systems are they on do you know? I wonder if it’s a wide open thing where you get the vignetting at the edges making the centre a bit more highlighted.
      I haven’t noticed any with my lens on my Sony

    • @ravensatodds
      @ravensatodds 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Holtze thanks for your reply mate. I think I’ve seen it on GH4 and GH5 but it could also be additional glass elements in speedboosters or maybe just lenses that are in poor condition. I’ve found some pretty decent prices on EBay so it’s probably worth the gamble 👍🏼

  • @ultraviolet7129
    @ultraviolet7129 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the content! Keep em coming

  • @romansheshegov6146
    @romansheshegov6146 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! In Russia i pay this lens for 30 dollars. With Canon RP and 5x focus-picking(?) it works very nice.
    For wild animals and for birds it is nice desicion:fine macro, bokeh and color. Now, in covid time,without travel, i can only walk in forrest and 70-210 Fd in this time is my favorite Lens:)Yes, maybe i can pay lens better, but hier i have cheap lens for all ideas with nice result.

  • @MikMilman
    @MikMilman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loving your videos!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Mik! I’m having fun making them! Hoping it resonates! I know this stuff can be super niche, but working in tv and film for 15 years...these have inspired me on a whole new level! :) thanks for watching mate.

    • @MikMilman
      @MikMilman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze It's niche but theres plenty of us.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like it niche to be honest! Keeps it more intimate and friendly it seems. Amazingly supporting and knowledgeable community behind it.

  • @jenohogan9254
    @jenohogan9254 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I happened to acquire this lens by accident, when I bought my Canon AE-1. I think I've used it once. You may have convinced me to give it another try, once my adapter for my Fuji camera arrives. :-D

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      What Fuji camera did you get? If it's an APS-C than you'll have much longer range with that crop factor! Hope you enjoy it as much as I do Jen!

    • @FLORAMORAITINI
      @FLORAMORAITINI 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze Compared to the Fuji XF 50-140 2.8 which is truly much much much more expensive is there also a huge difference in picture quality???

  • @samuellawrence3239
    @samuellawrence3239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I want to know how Canon FD lenses will optically perform on crop sensor Canon EOS camera. I'm happy with manual focus and control.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      1.53x zoom on the crop, still works just gives you less WIDE and more TELE ;)

  • @ranadheervarmavegiraju8945
    @ranadheervarmavegiraju8945 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I always want to own a vintage lens, but I am afraid about the quality, is there any chance you can share the dealer details on eBay, cause they seem to be in very good condition. Thanks in advance.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This seller doesn’t have anything anymore, the best way is just examine photos, make sure they offer free returns and look at the selling reputation of the dealer. It’s not that big of a risk, it’s in their best interest to sell good condition lenses.

  • @davidedwards8769
    @davidedwards8769 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NICE REVIEW , I LOVE THIS LENS

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks David! Ya it's decent, especially at that price. I don't use a tele too often, so glad to have this as an option for those few and far between times I do :)

  • @adithyadivakar2425
    @adithyadivakar2425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome Video! You should try out the Nikon version of this lens and possibly do a review. It's a 70-210 f4 lens and that lens is pretty amazing too!!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I should actually keep an eye out for one. It would be interesting to see the two vs each other. I'd actually like to get my hands on a modern Sony 70-200 f/4 to see what that huge price difference gets you ;)

  • @titaniumwaffle4304
    @titaniumwaffle4304 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have been using the a7riii with pentax 80-200mm f4.5 and its been awesome

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The RIII image quality eats the SII's for breakfast/lunch and dinner. I'm going to keep an eye for some Pentax Lenses at the vintage sale this coming weekend.

    • @titaniumwaffle4304
      @titaniumwaffle4304 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mark Holtze if you see the 15mm f3.5 I have been hunting it for months

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      M series?

    • @titaniumwaffle4304
      @titaniumwaffle4304 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's just called SMC pentax 15mm 3.5 it has a massive lens hood I have an old magazine clipping that lists the hole SMC line

    • @titaniumwaffle4304
      @titaniumwaffle4304 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      here is a link to the list fockert.xs4all.nl/~pentax/jpg_mini/06075_nl/de_vele_ogen_05.jpg

  • @blake.crosby
    @blake.crosby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So many lenses! Curious to know how you keep them in tip-top shape. Any tips on keeping them clean/dust free? How do you transport them? Do you use individual cases for them? Do you have to use different cleaning solutions for plastic vs. metal?

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your curiosity is matched by mine lol. Tip Top shape? Handle them with care. Keeping them clean or dust free would imply they're stagnant for long and they're never stagnant for long ;) I'm always rotating them so I don't feel dust can settle. I do keep them on display nicely though as I love their aesthetic on a shelf. I don't actually use any solutions to clean, just a lens rag for the optics once and awhile, but they're pretty resilient, being 30-50 years old ;) (They don't make them like they used to) ;)

  • @DerSchoermbro
    @DerSchoermbro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have this lens in my kit, but most of the time, I choose two of my primes instead of this beast simply because of the weight and size of it. But it's a great lens if you have a tripod and don't care about size and weight!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm a prime shooter myself most of the time as well, i haven't used this in awhile, mostly because when I'm out shooting I'm shooting for that lens. My legs are my telephoto ;)

    • @DerSchoermbro
      @DerSchoermbro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarkHoltze It seems I pretty much have the same shooting style as you, most of the time I pick one (or maybe two) lens(es) and try to get the best images out of this particular lens, so I can try out a lot of old glass and find the treasures ;D

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DerSchoermbro Totally, I feel also the more you do this, the more you start to develop an eye for that focal length. With zooms you're always re-framing and not really paying attention to what focal length you're shooting at. That's fine, but I enjoy having developed a eye for certain primes. This would look good in a 35 or I wish I had my 85 with me for that shot.

    • @DerSchoermbro
      @DerSchoermbro 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarkHoltze Definitely, before I got my first vintage prime I shot with my kit zoom lens, the images I got weren't bad, but you could see a difference between the first shots with the prime lens. That was the moment I changed my shooting style towards primes and I never regretted it, I just love the individual style of the lenses and, as you said, slowly develop a sense like, that subject might look good with lens x, and this with lens y. But the best thing is, it's really fun to get to know these individual lenses :D

  • @SteveRockstein2
    @SteveRockstein2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First, wonderfully entertaining video. Second, as a long time Canon shooter, I owned the best, fastest FD glass but sold all if it when I went digital in 2002. When I moved to Sony mirrorless, I bought back many of the lenses that I had let go. From the L series I have the 24 f1.4, 80-200 f4 and 300 f4. Also have a 20, 35 and 85. I love the look and process of my work with this glass.
    One question: how did you adapt the FD to the C100?
    Thanks. Looking forward to more great content from you.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FD to EOS adapter, I don’t use the FD stuff on my c100 often because the adapter has a little glass element so the FD works with EOS dslr’s. They do have dedicated eF mounts you can mount to your FD lenses though that would work better with a cinema camera.

    • @SteveRockstein2
      @SteveRockstein2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Mark.

  • @orangebetsy
    @orangebetsy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:16 you caught that bldg being put up next to Grand Central!

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How does it look now? I figured it was prob going to piss a lot of ppl off 😆

  • @luisansorena
    @luisansorena 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mark: I have one question. It’s not about this video. It’s about workflow. I hope it’s ok if I ask here. I edit using a 2015 MacBook Pro connected to a WD external hard disc (HDD), where I keep my footage. I don’t know if that’s the right way to do it. The thing is: this system worked pretty well for me with HD footage from my Canon G7x. But now i have a 4K camera and with bigger files the process takes ages. My question is: with a SDD external disc, would the process be faster? There are many videos out there about workflow, but they focus more on the backup process. Thank you so much in advance

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi mate. I keep all my media on an outside disk always. If you have an SSD with a good USB c/thunderbolt connection you should be fine. Now 4k can be a bit of a pig on the system, but it won’t be held back by external storage of the storage is SSD.
      I have some media on a 7200 rpm hard drive through thunderbolt and it never gives me problems on a 2011 specc iMac at home.
      I need a computer update I know lol.

    • @luisansorena
      @luisansorena 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mark Holtze thank you, Mark. This helps a lot. I appreciate it. So as far as I understand, the thing goes this way: HDD for backup and SDD for editing, better with a Thunderbolt. And woow, we can say that your 2011 Mac has done his job pretty well

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My pleasure. Yes it has lol. I have a stil running G4 tower and G5 cheese grater that also runs. These desktops are resilient

    • @luisansorena
      @luisansorena 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mark Holtze pretty sure new lines won’t last as the old ones. ;-)

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes prob not lol. I’m making them no money holding onto these so long..but I’m a lifer because of their proven ability to manage what I throw at them ;)

  • @hitheadline
    @hitheadline 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great stuff, love your sound and video work. Question, do you find the lens is a bit heavy on your camera body? I'm having trouble finding a suitable tripod collar, not sure if they ever made one. Using it on a xt2.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually don't find this lens heavy. I don't really have much to compare it to, but my CZ 85mm 1.4 is a brick compared to this lens.
      I think it would be good on the XT2, but that's just my personal opinion. It sure isn't that expensive so the risk might be worth it. Sell it for what you got it if you hate it.
      I never found it to be an issue on the tripod, it's nothing compared to the CZ 80-200 F4 or most modern fast telephoto's.
      PS: Thanks for the nice compliment Ian, glad you're enjoying this stuff. I figured I'd get to the business of your comment before addressing the complementary side hehehe.
      Thanks again mate, let me know if you have any further questions.

  • @FLORAMORAITINI
    @FLORAMORAITINI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thak you Mark for the useful review. I got one but I do not know what adaptors can be used to be used with new cameras, either canon 5 IV of Fuji mirroless.

    • @MarkHoltze
      @MarkHoltze  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!