“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”, "those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable"
@@theodorus956 debate is abt convincing the judge. You don't feel facts as you feel stories and analogies. That's why the best debaters use a blend of not just logos and ethos, but also pathos.
@@scipioafricanus2649 yeaa i know that's why none of the korean debaters get into the world champion ships koreans work so hard in their facts their perfection but in truth it's all based on facts not their analogies aor they're thoughts. but to be honest in this debate singapore doesn't really have a good look tho but than they won haha
@@jeongminkimlucian yea it's all about balance. You can sound great but be saying absolute bs, or u can sound bad but be spitting facts. sometimes the analogies don't work but a blend of everything is usually the most persuasive. imo this was a rly good topic and both teams performed rly well
I feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and am trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
Iam feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and i trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
Motion : TH Supports restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of the right-wing populism Government : England Opposition : Singapore Winner : Singapore
majority of it is extemporaneous. we don’t debate by writing out every word we’re planning to say, nor complete sentences. it’s probably just a few key words or a thesis level claim they’re aiming to make
I think both sides were absolutely great. Singapore won because they were slightly better, and maybe a little bit more because the motion was biased at the first place.
Its not biased its basically debate in general, u could get something lucky or not yet If ur good at debating ur own government side or opponent side, will give u more points
So the debate came down to a 0.5 differential and yet Singapore won by an 8-1 split? There's no way the debate was that close if Singapore won by a resounding landslide.
It's clearly singapore's side's win, becaues england haven't discuss how by changing this policy help the most vulnerables stakeholders in this debate, there're no analysis how why the restrictions are necessary; singapore discuss the vulnerables and solid reaosn how they help the laborers, addionally they discuss about why is it principally wrong on prop's side.
The way he took off his glasses and was like : "Look, we don't think it's surprising..." the tone was perfect, he's a good debater, undoubtedly. All the others were good too!!
I’m quite sure he stuttered and meant “scapegoating” rather than the sake cake. Scapegoating minorities would be blaming them for something they didn’t do, and shifting the blame towards a certain group of people.
This house supports the restriction of free speech on the rise of right wing populism. Kinda late considering this comment was 3yr ago lmao but eh wth...
England: *arranges the argument in points Gives stats and data Points out what args Singapore missed* ADJ: And Singapore wins on an 8:1 split Kidding they both did GREAT ^^
nah kaya gini dong yg dibahas hal penting dan byk full ga dipotong potong yg bisa menimbulkan salah penafsiran.kalau indonesia medianya dipergunakan seperti ini bahas hal penting kan byk orang yg ikut terbantu dan mengedukasi .bukan yg spt berita dan acara tv sekarang yg dibahas malah gaya pakaian istri presiden dan statusnya satu per satu hal itu kan ga bagus dan publikkan spt di bodoh bodohi saja menampilkberita dan acara tv sekarang bikin malu aja yg disajikan bukan apa yg dibahas dlm g20 melainkan gaya tampilan busana istri presiden atau status pendidikan istri presiden . jgn menilai orang dari luarnya saja itu termasuk hal yg tdk baik untuk publik dan tdk penting untuk dibahas dan dibesar besarkan. apa kalian ga kira kalau negara lain mengecap netizen indo jd berakhlak buruk karena sumber dr berita dan acara tv yg menampilkan hal yg tdk penting dan remeh temeh di besar besarkan . jadilah netizen yg selektif jgn ikut arus berita dan acara tv yg tdk bagus untuk ditonton dan hanya memikirkan views yg besar biar byk pemasukan bukan mikirin bantu menolong orang lain lewat media .an hal yg remeh temeh dan tdk penting untuk dibahas.
ladies, gentlemen, fellow wizards (points at self), muggles (points and the audience)
Liepa Kairytė 😂😂
Harryyy!!!
Why wasn't I called? Fyi I'm mudblood
HES AMAZINGGG
Savage
“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”, "those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable"
is that what they said? Dude i don't agree with the 'darkness' analogy, its just stupid. I thought debate should be based on cold hard facts?
@@theodorus956 debate is abt convincing the judge. You don't feel facts as you feel stories and analogies. That's why the best debaters use a blend of not just logos and ethos, but also pathos.
@@scipioafricanus2649 yeaa i know that's why none of the korean debaters get into the world champion ships koreans work so hard in their facts their perfection but in truth it's all based on facts not their analogies aor they're thoughts. but to be honest in this debate singapore doesn't really have a good look tho but than they won haha
@@jeongminkimlucian yea it's all about balance. You can sound great but be saying absolute bs, or u can sound bad but be spitting facts. sometimes the analogies don't work but a blend of everything is usually the most persuasive. imo this was a rly good topic and both teams performed rly well
Well said
the first proposition speaker looks like harry potter LOL
Hence the harry potter reference at the start of his speech XD
James Potter!!!!! Not harry
EVEN SOUNDS LIKE HIM!!!
h5yegfdsd
he really does
These speeches are amazing!! I thought that I could articulate, but these boys are on another level!
tru....how can they be this fluent...?
yes , and i wonder where they collect so much data from and is able to organise it
“Instead we’re having public conversations on the length of Donald Trump’s ..... fingers”
NICE ENGLAND
Very england
I feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and am trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
Same here :D
Can’t say I’m different
tru
Hey, ur arent the only one
Singapore just won the Triwizard Tournament! Deserved!
that english accent is an unfair advantage
i’d believe the earth was flat if he told me so
It’s not even an advantage
That face is
idk but it truly is
nah, singapore accent is even more so unfair
Iam feel like I am the only kid watching this stuff but at the start "Fellow wizards and muggles" added a sense of humor to the speech. And the wand thing too. I joined the school debating club this year actually and i trying to get some inspiration and motivation for our competion.
I totally enjoy the debate.
It was just a great argument and discussion.
I love almost every single moment it.
there are some i couldn't hear. would you mind helping me a bit?
@@HuyenNguyen-xo8kk letasoft soundbiooster for free
Amazing debate by both sides, I was quite surprised by how much the winners won - it seemed much closer. 2 Opp's Style was on point
They argued nicely that right wing populism is problematic, not why their free speech should be restricted.
The speeches are great! Thank you for sharing this recording!
damnnnn Singapore. They did great
Yup. I knew they had won the moment their first speaker finished
Yes he is james, harry's dad
Motion : TH Supports restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of the right-wing populism
Government : England
Opposition : Singapore
Winner : Singapore
i thought she said "the first speaker is way too young" at 4:48
Omg same😂😂🤣😅
lmao me too
Same here
LMFAO.... Same here.. Literally...
The third speaker is our way home according to the subtitles 😭
Yer a wizard, Harry
Ryan Wee brings Singapore a WIN
Fahri Ramadhan S. ryan win for the win! ryan wee for best speaker
I like the way of your delivering speech so much dear Arthur James.
Just like a combat between many Eminem(s)....
I love the way arthur take off his glasses 😭😭 cool af
Time stamp?
@@winidwiyuniarti4831 11:35
Ikr!!!
1st Opp speaker was amazing
Propositions reply speech was just chef's kiss 👌
Ryan wee is amazing!
I just love his enthusiasm
Bruhh, my brain just fried just from listening to their arguments, my brain is too shallow for this lmao
what do you write on that microscopic card dude? i cant even write a sentence on it
majority of it is extemporaneous. we don’t debate by writing out every word we’re planning to say, nor complete sentences. it’s probably just a few key words or a thesis level claim they’re aiming to make
The weighing done by third opp was incredible
Ed as a reply speaker: But you say: Ahhhh... but they say: Ahhhh... Unbelievable
lol oke
bruh
I think both sides were absolutely great. Singapore won because they were slightly better, and maybe a little bit more because the motion was biased at the first place.
Exactly. Who in their right mind would oppose the freedom of speech lol
Its not biased its basically debate in general, u could get something lucky or not yet
If ur good at debating ur own government side or opponent side, will give u more points
@@Raphael-en6db this is world schools not United States schools
so they all smart smart eh my anxiety wont even let me to be there
1:04:19 me when I keep listening team England giving more of the same.
That's literally me in the video, I'm glad you noticed XD
Avash Byanjankar coach ! I miss debating.
particularly PECULIAR observation.!!
hence the harry potter refrences
@@punkyojha8609omg me too
ngl i'm just watching this because of Arthur
its funny to see singapore arguing for free speech
AKHHH
XD
Even when the motion was biased England was good
So the debate came down to a 0.5 differential and yet Singapore won by an 8-1 split? There's no way the debate was that close if Singapore won by a resounding landslide.
You’d be surprised… some of my closest debates in PF rounds have been a unanimous decision between the 3 judges
Right, if the difference is obvious to the judging panel, it doesn’t matter how small or large it could be.
It's clearly singapore's side's win, becaues england haven't discuss how by changing this policy help the most vulnerables stakeholders in this debate, there're no analysis how why the restrictions are necessary; singapore discuss the vulnerables and solid reaosn how they help the laborers, addionally they discuss about why is it principally wrong on prop's side.
I'm watching every WSDC speech to prepare for my upcoming debate . My attention span of a goldfish is NOT helping 😩😩🤚🤚😭😭
I’m a bit late 💀 but which one?
hey idk if ull see this but how did the debate went?? i also have a debate coming up im so nervousss omg😭
@@fishfooties9850 I won !!!!
@@fishfooties9850 Good luck !!!
@@aravioli4203 Um the IDL
i was like weee when ryan wee came and brace yaselvesss when edward bracey was like yo
team england is just harry and draco lmao
wait, for real lmaooo
And Blaise
The way he took off his glasses and was like : "Look, we don't think it's surprising..." the tone was perfect, he's a good debater, undoubtedly. All the others were good too!!
Ed's arguments steal the show...
I love the second speaker of England! Singapore also doing great!
SAME
Singapore won
Me too
Ikrrr
Singapore (Opposition) won on a split. 8-1.
by far the best debate I've seen
True, I've been watching so much debate vids and this one was by far the best, the quality the video and the level of this debate is just truly class
I am bad at English so just a question here, in the first speech of proposition there is a part of "ie the sake cake"(at 6:12) what does that mean?
I’m quite sure he stuttered and meant “scapegoating” rather than the sake cake. Scapegoating minorities would be blaming them for something they didn’t do, and shifting the blame towards a certain group of people.
@@anthony-kt4ir Thanks for the detailed explanation, now I can use that phrase in debates.
Can you please explain what it means to me? The comment is deleted
@@ayaelbarazi7818 I think it means scapegoating
how can i find the first speaker’s social media if there r a million arthur james😟‼️
All of them did very good . By the way the first speaker is so handsome .
The MC's english accent was bit difficult to understand for me 😅
Well, that’s how majority of Indonesian english will sounds like.
I guess the 3rd speaker of singapore really helps to win
Why do we debate 😊 Outstanding pressure on audeince and judges 😮
Thanks
wait, what is the motion?
The Grand Final in Compation of English Language in Bali can Improve your English Without aware Many attandence State International.
What is the motion againnnnn
This house supports the restriction of free speech on the rise of right wing populism.
Kinda late considering this comment was 3yr ago lmao but eh wth...
I hate when my obsession with eyeglasses boy is come now.
the very premise of the first proposition speaker's argument is flawed
Looks like Harry and Ron in England’s team
Harry and Malfoy 😂
@@Sani_____ lol you’re right
what was the motion
i just enjoyed the debate
I only heard "expeliarmus avada kedavra wingardium leviosa populism"
This house supports restrictions on free speech to combat right-wing populism
First preposition speaker 🤩
What type of frames were used in this debate
1st speaker goverment cakep huhu
kaya harry potterrrr
5:53. 1st Prop.
23:07. 2nd Prop.
I never knew you can interrupt other debaters in a debate?
In the parliamentary system of debate you can, its called a POI(point of information)
In formal debates. (As far as i know,) you can raise POIs (Points of information) for the debater to ‘whack’ and knock them down during their speech
20:01
Excuse me? what is the motion again?
- This House supports restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of right-wing populism
harry potter is something else!!!!!!
Hello....
🙋Salaam...
I am going to get admission in wsdc .....😊😊😊
Singapore was so good, rl rl high quality debate
bahasa Inggris semua nih yee.. 😆
is the debate centered on Donald Trump and his political system?
Motion: this house supports the restriction of free speech to combat the rise of right-wing populism
life saver
Please what is the motion
this was such a opp biased motion though
True, restricting free speech is a crazy thing to suggest
im fairly new to debate so could someone explain to me what an 8-1 split is?
its when there is 8 votes for one team and 1 vote for the other, hence a split of 8 to 1
@@sherlinaaurellia7838 thanks :)
Ya Allah bang, hang punya accent aku langsung tak paham 😅🤣
Ok how about you catch this ratio?
I love the 2nd speaker omG
I love the Outcome!
What is the motion?
look at that human timer lol
Excuseme, is this prepare motion?
Yeah it is..
2019
can anyone give me the motion?
pls
England: *arranges the argument in points
Gives stats and data
Points out what args Singapore missed*
ADJ: And Singapore wins on an 8:1 split
Kidding they both did GREAT ^^
Mizusawa Mei pfffffttt man team england though 😍👌
Anharul Islam #Hana
Not really, England is the team that didn’t respond to arguments and just repeated the same argument.
¿Cuál fue la moción?
This house support restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of right wing populism
This house support restrictions on free speech to combat the rise of right wing populism
could they disturb one another's speech?
In Parliamentary debate it is allowed to offer a POI, an interruption should the speaker who is currently speaking accepts
2nd opp was fire
IKR
VERY GOOD POINT OF INFORMATIONS
England guy brought up duterte's troll farm...10 points to that, lol
nah kaya gini dong yg dibahas hal penting dan byk full ga dipotong potong yg bisa menimbulkan salah penafsiran.kalau indonesia medianya dipergunakan seperti ini bahas hal penting kan byk orang yg ikut terbantu dan mengedukasi .bukan yg spt berita dan acara tv sekarang yg dibahas malah gaya pakaian istri presiden dan statusnya satu per satu hal itu kan ga bagus dan publikkan spt di bodoh bodohi saja menampilkberita dan acara tv sekarang bikin malu aja yg disajikan bukan apa yg dibahas dlm g20 melainkan gaya tampilan busana istri presiden atau status pendidikan istri presiden . jgn menilai orang dari luarnya saja itu termasuk hal yg tdk baik untuk publik dan tdk penting untuk dibahas dan dibesar besarkan. apa kalian ga kira kalau negara lain mengecap netizen indo jd berakhlak buruk karena sumber dr berita dan acara tv yg menampilkan hal yg tdk penting dan remeh temeh di besar besarkan . jadilah netizen yg selektif jgn ikut arus berita dan acara tv yg tdk bagus untuk ditonton dan hanya memikirkan views yg besar biar byk pemasukan bukan mikirin bantu menolong orang lain lewat media .an hal yg remeh temeh dan tdk penting untuk dibahas.
Her english is extreamly great.
what singaporean assister did there btw?
They help to prepare arguments for this motion.
English accents are more understandable than those from Singapore.
One day...
i kinda feel england shouldve won
Just because of the accent but if you compare the points, Singapore has a deserved win
um why so smart?
13:21
Motion ???
Listen to the prime minister's first sentence.
This house supports restrictions on free speech to combat right-wing populism
this is so cool
is this a prepared or impromptu motion?
Impromptu.
It's prepared. Finals are always prepared motions.
Who's the winner ?
Singapore
what's happen ini 53:20