Thank you Mrs Bannerji for enlightening us on procedures tobe followed for the appointment of high court and Supreme Court judges and your suggestions to remain faithful to the oath.
The people must have the right to Recall a Judge, Politician and Bureaucrat. Whether the elected legislature is superior or the judiciary is superior is moot. The people are supreme and these three branches exist because of the people. Whoever appoints a judge - collegium, NJAC or parliament, the power to recall that judge by the people will put to rest whether the appointment was proper or not.
Does the highest judiciary by and large reflect the diversity of our society in its last 75 years of existence? If the answer is a definite and a big no, it is safe to conclude that the collegium has become or to be seen as a cosy instrument, for promoting nepotism, caste hierarchy and even family rule. It is a self promoting and self protecting coterie cohabiting outside the precincts of the constitution on the strength of sheer verbose on the Constitution by the very same self perpetuating coterie. A Khap panchayat too could be articulated to be the most independent body by those who have a vested interest to preserve and perpetuate it. The pertinent question is to whom in a democracy the highest judiciary is accountable? To a collegium ? Which incidentally has no provision in the Constitution!
Still I am not enlightened of the reason why Justice Joseph who had a seniority of 37 th or so was made in HC over taking this erudite, frank and courageous woman judge who had a seniority of 2 nd or so. Adding insult to injury, when the Presidential warrant curated that distortion on appointment to sc, the lobby was very vociferous. Who nudged her to stop by sending a paper when she was making a presentation before the people of India, actually poured shame on himself.
The population of India in 1950 was less than 40 crores .Now it is nearly 140 crores .The number of law colleges and law gratuagates increased manifold . Like that the quantum of legal cases have been increased immensely . Only those having so much money and. influence can get justice in. the Supreme Court . Underprivileged and poor sections of society are not able to approach the Supreme Court due to lack of money and such influence .So more Supreme Court benches must be opened as Zonal level in Chennai Kolkata and Mumbai .
DOES THE COLLEGIUM HAS ANY MEMBERS FROMTHE GOVERNMENT OR IT IS FOR THE JUDGE BY THE JUDGE TO THE JUDGE. EVERYTHING IN FAMILY - LIKE PM NEHRU GIVEN BHARAT RATNA TO PANDIT NEHRU ETC.
Collegium system made by Supreme Court is undefined no legal force and setting aside NJAC by Supreme Court in 1993 is judiciary Independent overreach not justified , parliament and Supreme Court can jointly make appointment of judges amicaly in Supreme Court until British colonialism incorporated in article 50 disincorporated and people set up as their instruments like legislature executive and judiciary for package of reform to carry out the wishes of people, Supreme Court heredatory Monarch self-government unbridled judiciary Independency overreach power enfringement of rights of people 5 crore backlog cases pending and several crore complaints of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights denial of access to justice revealed on 10.07.2017 in PIL No.224 of 2017 Supreme Court refused abolition of British colonialism judiciary from Supreme Court,
Wonderful speech by the former Supreme Court judge ..
Thank you Mrs Bannerji for enlightening us on procedures tobe followed for the appointment of high court and Supreme Court judges and your suggestions to remain faithful to the oath.
all due respect but she needs to fire her wig maker lol
Welcoming and implementable suggestion, enabling corrective actions, to remove the one though eligible but not suitable.
The people must have the right to Recall a Judge, Politician and Bureaucrat. Whether the elected legislature is superior or the judiciary is superior is moot. The people are supreme and these three branches exist because of the people.
Whoever appoints a judge - collegium, NJAC or parliament, the power to recall that judge by the people will put to rest whether the appointment was proper or not.
Does the highest judiciary by and large reflect the diversity of our society in its last 75 years of existence? If the answer is a definite and a big no, it is safe to conclude that the collegium has become or to be seen as a cosy instrument, for promoting nepotism, caste hierarchy and even family rule. It is a self promoting and self protecting coterie cohabiting outside the precincts of the constitution on the strength of sheer verbose on the Constitution by the very same self perpetuating coterie. A Khap panchayat too could be articulated to be the most independent body by those who have a vested interest to preserve and perpetuate it. The pertinent question is to whom in a democracy the highest judiciary is accountable? To a collegium ? Which incidentally has no provision in the Constitution!
Great words🙏
I have read
Three Constitution
India And its Amendment
UK Constitution
And
USA
Constitution
Indian
Constitution is the
Foundation of.
Democracy
Still I am not enlightened of the reason why Justice Joseph who had a seniority of 37 th or so was made in HC over taking this erudite, frank and courageous woman judge who had a seniority of 2 nd or so. Adding insult to injury, when the Presidential warrant curated that distortion on appointment to sc, the lobby was very vociferous. Who nudged her to stop by sending a paper when she was making a presentation before the people of India, actually poured shame on himself.
The population of India in 1950 was less than 40 crores .Now it is nearly 140 crores .The number of law colleges and law gratuagates increased manifold . Like that the quantum of legal cases have been increased immensely . Only those having so much money and. influence can get justice in. the Supreme Court . Underprivileged and poor sections of society are not able to approach the Supreme Court due to lack of money and such influence .So more Supreme Court benches must be opened as Zonal level in Chennai Kolkata and Mumbai .
DOES THE COLLEGIUM HAS ANY MEMBERS FROMTHE GOVERNMENT OR IT IS FOR THE JUDGE BY THE JUDGE TO THE JUDGE. EVERYTHING IN FAMILY - LIKE PM NEHRU GIVEN BHARAT RATNA TO PANDIT NEHRU ETC.
Sounding bit rational unlike lokur s
Chief Minister of West Bengal mm paid
Ten crores to Suresh Das
Why
Big
Question
Law Minister
Respected and Honble
Mr Kiran Riju
Informed me
Collegium system made by Supreme Court is undefined no legal force and setting aside NJAC by Supreme Court in 1993 is judiciary Independent overreach
not justified , parliament and Supreme Court can jointly make appointment of judges amicaly in Supreme Court until British colonialism incorporated in article 50 disincorporated and people set up as their instruments like legislature executive and judiciary for package of reform to carry out the wishes of people,
Supreme Court heredatory Monarch self-government unbridled judiciary Independency overreach power enfringement of rights of people 5 crore backlog cases pending and several crore complaints of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights denial of access to justice revealed on 10.07.2017 in PIL No.224 of 2017 Supreme Court refused abolition of British colonialism judiciary from Supreme Court,
iske balon ko kya ho gaya ... 😂...yeh sale fairness ki baat karate hai - sharam bhi nahi ati ..