KSP: Nuclear-Powered Jetliner to EVE!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @1mariomaniac
    @1mariomaniac 5 ปีที่แล้ว +453

    "We don't have nuclear engines in the game"
    Nerv atomic engine: _Am I a joke to you?_

    • @didntThinkBeforePosting
      @didntThinkBeforePosting 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      He said JET engines
      Still funny though

    • @juleswoodbury58
      @juleswoodbury58 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      the nerv-a engine is not an atomic engine as it uses oxidizer. closed bell and open cycle engines heat liquid gas or just plain but volatile liquids like alcohol and kerosene to accelerate thus there are very efficient. Also you can build SSTO with ramjets and open cycle engines as they both only use liquid fuel, so you do not have to balance the craft out midflight. ideally, you can also use thermonuclear jetengines, as shown here to take your SSTO on a suboribtal trajectory without using any d/V and then fire up a thermal nozzle which uses the wasteheat of your thermonuclear jet engines as a propellant to go into orbit with practically no fuel at all. Once in space, if you have a reactor on board that produces alot of waste heat you can go anywhere you like without using any fuel although the burn times might take a couple of years. So yeah nuclear propulsion is awesome. In the interstellar extended the nerv-a engine gets replaced with a real open cycle engine and you even get fuel tanks which only hold one kind of propellant thus saving alot of weight, since you don't need to have to have two tanks built into one cylinder. with only one long tank and the new nerv-a engine you can get up to 45000 d/V in a vacuum.

    • @1mariomaniac
      @1mariomaniac 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@juleswoodbury58 I mean yeah but the description of it literally calls it the "LV-N 'Nerv' Atomic Rocket Motor"

    • @pyrotection
      @pyrotection 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Jules Woodbury in fact the Nerv engine does not actually use oxidizer in practice! It is modeled after the real-world theoretical nuclear thermal rocket, which uses a fission reactor to heat its propellant and force it out of the rocket nozzle to generate thrust (as opposed to a normal rocket, which ignites the propellant and uses the energy released by the resulting chemical reaction for that purpose).

    • @robertecheverria4174
      @robertecheverria4174 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hahahahahaahahah he said "we don't have nuclear JET engines in the game"

  • @Graknorke
    @Graknorke 5 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    It's weird that nuclear trains didn't get as far, since trains can have very big/heavy engines in a way a plane can't.

    • @nukedukem6
      @nukedukem6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, everyone would like it, but no one wants it first

    • @Graknorke
      @Graknorke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sitfish1113
      tell that to the Americans

    • @alepepperoni2563
      @alepepperoni2563 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Graknorke Americans live rent free in your head

    • @KingOfTresune
      @KingOfTresune 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@sitfish1113 American trains are not powered through tracks

    • @sitfish1113
      @sitfish1113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KingOfTresune hold up what

  • @Giantsquid-kf8zh
    @Giantsquid-kf8zh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1269

    Every time I make a nuclear engine, someone over reacts
    FYI: I don't have a nuclear engine

    • @tabnk2
      @tabnk2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      please exit this room

    • @zk377
      @zk377 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      You have permission to Alt+F4 outta here

    • @UnintentionalSubmarine
      @UnintentionalSubmarine 6 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Well, don't have a melt down over it.

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hahaha over reacts! Get it?

    • @sparetime2475
      @sparetime2475 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      This pun was so bad I want to fallout of a moving car

  • @SnuffitLabs
    @SnuffitLabs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    The US did also experiment with molten salt cooled Thorium reactors for aircraft. The cool thing with those reactors is that they will shut themselves down before melting down.

    • @yellostarr
      @yellostarr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      this is why thorium is the best

    • @Eng1neer_panda
      @Eng1neer_panda 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@yellostarrnormal reactors have automatic shutdown to thats why there has only been 3 major nuclear meltdowns and only 1 of them has created a major environmental catastrophe so ya thorium’s good and all but not that much better than uranium

    • @El_Negro2003
      @El_Negro2003 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Half life?

  • @visibleconfusion9894
    @visibleconfusion9894 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1631

    How much for a ticket?

    • @boiboi9314
      @boiboi9314 6 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      700 Star bucks

    • @mumujibirb
      @mumujibirb 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      5000 trillion bucks

    • @c00lkid16
      @c00lkid16 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      no k-bucks

    • @howtocameronsyoungerbrothe5837
      @howtocameronsyoungerbrothe5837 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Can we get 5000 subscribers with no videos? Like 7 pound

    • @Lucas_15
      @Lucas_15 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I literally see you everywhere

  • @Master_Ed
    @Master_Ed 5 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    Me: creates nuclear reactor
    Me: shoots it
    Me: "meh, nothings happening"
    2 seconds later
    Guy from 2 miles: "you mean nothings left"

    • @celtoucan4956
      @celtoucan4956 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So could he now read your mind or get super hearing or did you?

    • @Kerbist
      @Kerbist 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the question may not be asked.

    • @Coli2603
      @Coli2603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He got it because of nuclear radiation

  • @vincentb5431
    @vincentb5431 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    8:49 *iT Is EleVeN ThIRty aT niGHt my DUdeS*

    • @MrNight-dg1ug
      @MrNight-dg1ug 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Saw this, checked time, then he said it

  • @currentcolt3655
    @currentcolt3655 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Due to how nuclear reactors work they require a much safer enrichment level of uranium 235, unlike a nuclear bomb that requires a high enrichment level. A nuclear bomb also needs to become super critical, something that is extremely hard or impossible to do in a standard reactor, but because of the fact that most reactors generate steam they can explode but it would be like a dirty bomb instead of a nuclear explosion

    • @Spartan-oq1yw
      @Spartan-oq1yw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are correct good sir the chance of a nuclear reactor exploding like the bomb would be so small......

    • @Viapish
      @Viapish 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cool

  • @Adam-ln2su
    @Adam-ln2su 6 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Your original blunder birds idea seems like something I’d really like to watch!

  • @Assault_Butter_Knife
    @Assault_Butter_Knife 6 ปีที่แล้ว +431

    My god, can you imagine if we really had nuclear cars? Every time a drunk driver accidentally scratched someones car the neighbouring city block would be vaporised.

    • @Aereto
      @Aereto 6 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Imagine nuclear cars in the Middle East. The region becomes a wasteland.

    • @oliverlemley9343
      @oliverlemley9343 6 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      nuclear reactors are physically incapable of exploding, they do not contain the right ingredients nor the right environment. Yes if the reactor was breached it could melt down and leak molten uranium fuel and radioactive vapors but it could not explode.

    • @Damien.D
      @Damien.D 6 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Yup.
      It's a very complicated thing to produce a nuclear explosion, it's a secret art only mastered by the real peoples who truly embraced Cold War with the joy of overwhelming destructive power.
      It's all about compressing the fissile material as quickly as possible, because the nuclear reaction tends to expend its own fuel at a tremendously high speed, thus stopping the reaction.
      A damaged nuclear reactor tends to overrun, makes it coolant boil, its containment vessel explode due to over-pressure, then everything melts, then cool down. Once cooled down, the reaction may resume, only to stop again once the material expended again enough, but it never happened because the fissile core is so mixed with foreign material from the rest of the reactor it loose its criticality in the process of destroying itself. A nuclear meltdown is, in fact, a mostly fail-safe process if the core is kept contained in a strong enough building (TMI is a good example of a "safe" severe nuclear incident).
      So, no megaton boom with reactors.

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      It would just contaminate everything and give everyone cancer, rather than become an actual nuclear warhead capable of kiloton blasts.

    • @Assault_Butter_Knife
      @Assault_Butter_Knife 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Jupiter__001_ A fate worse than death

  • @Cby0530
    @Cby0530 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Luckily this isn't a DC 10 based airliner.Will make a great explosion if it crashes.
    Say,great effort making one of the greatest fan designs.

  • @acr_-kj8gd
    @acr_-kj8gd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +157

    Tried to install RSS
    Used my largest rocket to go to Mun
    ...
    Cant even reach half of ideal orbit
    :(

    • @Aereto
      @Aereto 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Also known as you really got to rethink your distance measurements. You need a really powerful rocket.

    • @kurtweinstein8450
      @kurtweinstein8450 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Takes about 9.8km/s delta V to reach 7.8km/s LEO. Takes about 4.6km/s to go from the surface of Kerbin to Mun landing and return. So less than half of what is needed for LEO.
      Get something like FASA to provide you with real rocket parts i.e. bigger tanks and higher thrust engines.

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My first orbital craft was a ssto that went to the mun and back.

    • @kurtweinstein8450
      @kurtweinstein8450 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@psun256 That isn't so hard in default KSP. We are talking RSS. Now that would be a challenge though, an RSS ssto that could do a lunar fly-by. I don't think there is a spaceplane fuselage that could survive re-entry without turning off heat or modifying the part files.

    • @garethllewelynevans3553
      @garethllewelynevans3553 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brietr it’s more you fucking Neanderthal

  • @cinimatics
    @cinimatics 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thats interesting that we got closer to a nuclear plane than we did a nuclear train. I feel like a train would be much more suitable especially considering steam trains had been used previously.

    • @Concavenator_corcovatus
      @Concavenator_corcovatus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fr fr

    • @Anonymous-zu7dh
      @Anonymous-zu7dh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A train is potentially more vulnerable to regular old theft or otherwise damage though. A plane flies from A to B during flight only malfunctions or hijackings can force it to deviate normally, any airports they're likely to visit are likely under 24/7 surveillance, so are probably likely train stations where the train will stop.
      The thing is, a train runs through random forests where there's no way surveillance can be financed. A potential terror group only needs to shortcircuit the tracks behind a signal to make it show red, and the train comes to a neat halt, where they can steal the nuclear material at gun point. And what if the signals malfunction and the nuclear train runs full speed right into another train, a nuclear disaster waiting to happen. The train can also malfunction in the middle of nowhere, then you're stuck and reaching the train with support vehicles may be time critical regardless of if these vehicles can run on rail or you must hurriedly build a road into the middle of nowhere.

  • @abritinspace
    @abritinspace 6 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Great vid! I always like the recreations of concepts, it just shows what could have been!

    • @xuaalbito8303
      @xuaalbito8303 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      do you use youtube from space? how is internet speed there?

  • @lewismassie
    @lewismassie 6 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    Well I hope your date went well :D

    • @sharkfood
      @sharkfood 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I bet she's toxic :O

    • @wz5110
      @wz5110 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL

    • @albertopm96
      @albertopm96 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sharkfood OOF

    • @Administrator_O-5
      @Administrator_O-5 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me it went really well & his reactor got to meltdown!

  • @jkerman5113
    @jkerman5113 6 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    *Reads Title* Damn I was gonna make a video like that!
    *Watches Video* WAIT WHAT THEY TRIED TO ACTUALLY FKN DO THAT??

    • @TheEventHorizon909
      @TheEventHorizon909 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      JKerman511 the US also developed a spacecraft that was not just nuclear powered, it was powered by actual Nuclear Bombs.
      Project Orion is the name of it and Roverdude made a great stockalike version of it in KSP
      (Video by Curious Droid on the history of the Orion Project: th-cam.com/video/7dUYfDg3G2A/w-d-xo.html,
      And a Orbiter 2010 mars mission simulation: th-cam.com/video/DSK_mymJvkM/w-d-xo.html )

    • @anthonypelchat
      @anthonypelchat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They also proposed an unshielded nuclear missile designed to fly at supersonic speeds for weeks. The idea was to fly very low in enemy (Russian) territory doing heavy damage to buildings just with the Sonic blasts and spread heavy radiation all over the place. Horrible times.

    • @anthonypelchat
      @anthonypelchat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Here is the link on the missile I mentioned. It was project slam. I forgot that it also carried a payload of bombs as well.
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic_Low_Altitude_Missile

    • @davidk1308
      @davidk1308 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, and the NERV in KSP is based on the NERVA engine that was developed under the Project Rover program. It got close to being flight rated too. There were a bunch of tests. And then Project Pluto I believe tested air-breathing nuclear engines.
      As for Orion, it got close to being built too I think. People in the higher ups stopped it, but a lot of people across the board liked the idea (Air force, NASA, etc).

    • @Tuning3434
      @Tuning3434 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Anthony Pelchat
      O yeah! SLAM: The Flying Crowbar. And you think modern day Military-Industrial Complex is bad. Nowadays they are mostly wasting tax dollars and being horribly inefficient, in the 50s, 60s they where trying to murder the entire world in a test flight!

  • @kulasti
    @kulasti 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Before tackling Real Solar System, you might want to try Umbra Space Industries - the main difficulty it provides is life support. And it's not even necessarily the feeding aspect which is the most difficult aspect, I actually struggle a lot more with habitability. My first mission to Minmus was a partial failure because the kerbals got homesick in the lander on the way over and refused to work.

    • @Spartan-oq1yw
      @Spartan-oq1yw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol homesick??? Wimps

    • @Coli2603
      @Coli2603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      So they got homesick and therefore refused to operate the lander that is supposed to take them home? Seems legit

    • @GoldballIndustries
      @GoldballIndustries 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try to place down more kerbals

    • @geemcspankinson
      @geemcspankinson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Coli2603 The mod needs explosive collars, they sure ain't coming home without a head

    • @mjrlunpersonal
      @mjrlunpersonal ปีที่แล้ว

      @@geemcspankinson like the chinese military? 🤔

  • @flarerik
    @flarerik 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    "Tu-95"
    I think you got it wrong lol, that's a propeller-driven bomber (which is still interesting because the propellers spin so fast they cause quite a bit of ear rape; it gets even more hilarious when you find out it's also used for anti-submarine operations).
    EDIT: Wait, oops, there was the Tu-95LAL experiment and the Tu-119 concept. I should probably do the research and watch the whole video before commenting like a smartass.

    • @Spartan-oq1yw
      @Spartan-oq1yw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya.. Pretty sure we all have

  • @the7nthdovah674
    @the7nthdovah674 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hey Matt I just learned how to use the move and turn options in the editors and I made a small 3 seater plane, 1 crew module and a main cockpit based around using the editor options and it's pretty stable as long as you don't do sharp turn and I have air brakes and a main parachute if all else fails

  • @PeakedInterest
    @PeakedInterest ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude...you made me waste my last few kg of plutonium... That nuclear car was a bunk idea. Now how will I make my bom...I mean generator

    • @mattyo8828
      @mattyo8828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Verified?

  • @foraminuteforaminute4056
    @foraminuteforaminute4056 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    When Bob was chasing after the airplane ladder, Yakety Sax was playing in my mind.

  • @marksainsbury2422
    @marksainsbury2422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is one of your funniest I've seen. Pretty standard for most and then the bloopers just come thick and fast. Dry self-deprecation capped with unexpected kraken and "Laurel and Hardy". For some reason this just tickled me immensely. W00t!

  • @pieguy6992
    @pieguy6992 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Jet: (Hit Eve's atmosphere at just the right angle)
    The nuclear Engines: YEET
    Jeb: Um

  • @alanwatts8239
    @alanwatts8239 6 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Patrolling Eve almost makes you wish for a blue sky

    • @exactpeak5995
      @exactpeak5995 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I see what you did there ;)

    • @hunternelson3018
      @hunternelson3018 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Living on earth almost makes you with for a billion dollars

  • @RC-sr4cs
    @RC-sr4cs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Really appreciate the effort you put in these videos man

    • @archai2142
      @archai2142 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Holy sh*t why are you here Klaus?

  • @ethangoldwyre
    @ethangoldwyre 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you somehow get all of your 60 fps videos to somehow look even smoother and i love it!
    keep it up!!

  • @keshavsrivastava1956
    @keshavsrivastava1956 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Mission failed
    Reason: no mushroom clouds

  • @matsv201
    @matsv201 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun fact. Back in 1950 a nuclear powered jet engine would barley work. But nowdays when modern jet engine have a bypass ratio of 1:10 having a close cycle turbine driving a fan is actually not only possible, but makes a lot of sense. The reactor would also be tiny

  • @drgabe2908
    @drgabe2908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    [ Fallout fans loved that ]
    [ Todd Howard loved that ]
    [ 1950's loved that ]

  • @adriantrans-amgta5981
    @adriantrans-amgta5981 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Create a stock or modded orbital megafortress with artificial gravity, solar panels, a cargo bay for short-term exploration ships, supply ships, ect. Docking ports to be able to continually add stuff forever, and able to build stuff onboard. Plus you can use it to construct and deploy the parts for other fortresses from the first one.
    It is not to hard because you can launch up each individual section like a space station.
    If you do this... you can use it in the super colonization.

  • @vladimirlenin4080
    @vladimirlenin4080 6 ปีที่แล้ว +724

    Ew! This plane contains rAdIaTiOn. I don't want to go on it.
    I hope you realized i am joking

    • @TheEventHorizon909
      @TheEventHorizon909 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Vladimir Lenin coming from you I thought so. Communism works

    • @lemao_squash4486
      @lemao_squash4486 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Was that supposed to be a joke? Also thanks for clarifying that you're an idiot

    • @rogerc7960
      @rogerc7960 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Cos-ism is a death cult

    • @민기-f1p
      @민기-f1p 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      CHERNOBYL AIRPLANE
      CHERNOBYL AIRPLANE

    • @archai2142
      @archai2142 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok Lenin...

  • @thespartanmk1
    @thespartanmk1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite is the Nuclear powered Cruise Missile of Project Pluto. Envisioned to fly over the Soviet Union while supersonic and at very low level launching nuclear bombs out of the top on pre-determined targets. During the course of the flight it's nuclear engine would be showering the countryside in radiation and because of the nature of Nuclear engines, it would fly for weeks before finally crashing and serving as even better dispenser of radiation around it's crash site. It truly was the gift that would keep on giving.

  • @AA-vp1ru
    @AA-vp1ru 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    imagine if everything ran on nuclear power and world peace would be a thing

  • @neonfruit12
    @neonfruit12 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *plane explodes in the background*
    Matt: *talks about first space plane to eve*

  • @L.P.5895
    @L.P.5895 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have been bamboozled, thank you very much for that.

    • @rickharper4533
      @rickharper4533 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Little Professor bamboozled again, it was actually a doggo not a plane

  • @TrystyKat
    @TrystyKat ปีที่แล้ว

    Rolls-Royce developed a design for a nuclear-powered turbojet. The reactor coolant and working fluid for the turbojets was helium, and the reactor-turbojet package was expected to be used in aircraft like the Sud-Aviation Super-Caravelle.

  • @gagedittmann7358
    @gagedittmann7358 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I still won’t forget the time he said “I never make mistakes” and in every video he makes a mistake

  • @matthewkrohn6486
    @matthewkrohn6486 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just FYI Matt, the Tupolev Tu-95 still exists! Just not in the way you think it does. It is currently in service with the Russian Military for long range reconnaissance and Anti-Submarine warfare.

  • @magicyeti9256
    @magicyeti9256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    CHALLENGE:
    Land 2 project, 1 on mars and 1 on its moon with simultaneous departures and rejoin in space AND land on Earth

    • @MXS97
      @MXS97 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Duna Ike kerbin

  • @landoncash2927
    @landoncash2927 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    In short a small nuclear reactor wouldn't explode with a mushroom cloud, mushroom clouds aren't necessarily a by product of a nuclear explosion. Mushroom clouds are created when an explosion is large enough to create enough low density gas to create the shape. However producing the amount of energy necessary to do this is normally associated with nuclear bombs, but it is possible to create a mushroom cloud with anything explosive.

  • @truckerjesus8633
    @truckerjesus8633 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The tu-95 was powered by nk-12's, not nuclear engines

    • @aons5481
      @aons5481 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ikr

    • @AirJimInCT
      @AirJimInCT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ArizonaRanger.45 and neither the NB-36H/X-6 or the Soviet Tu-95 were actually powered by the reactors installed in them.

    • @faritik7
      @faritik7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AirJimInCT nah, Tu-95 had rotor engines

    • @AirJimInCT
      @AirJimInCT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@faritik7 the Tupolev Tu-95 was powered by turboprops. The variant that carried a small nuclear reactor was not powered by said reactor.

  • @kevinduliesco5468
    @kevinduliesco5468 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to make a shuttle fly?
    Matt: put 3+ primary wings and nuclear engines
    And some vertical and horizontal stabilizer

  • @WombleProductions
    @WombleProductions 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    “Tupolev Tu-95”
    It’s a turboprop.

    • @aibpresto
      @aibpresto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There was an aircraft based off the Tu-95 that was nuclear powered. I can't remember what it's called, though.
      If anybody can find the name, I'll give you a cookie.

    • @airplane4012
      @airplane4012 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TU-95LAL
      where’s my cookie

    • @aibpresto
      @aibpresto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Air Plane
      Yeah, that’s correct, you can have a cookie.

    • @georgew.9663
      @georgew.9663 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Air Plane 🍪

  • @vikkimcdonough6153
    @vikkimcdonough6153 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I suggest selecting "Ignore Max Temperature" in the debug menu and then trying to fly this thing in _Kerbol's_ atmosphere.

  • @zachbaird4717
    @zachbaird4717 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very nice work Matt I love your channel ( oh make sure to get me a first class ticket )

  • @TrainNutter
    @TrainNutter 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To be precise, the nuclear aircraft were:
    Tupolev TU-95LAL
    Convair NB-36H
    The Conviar X6 never flew

    • @AirJimInCT
      @AirJimInCT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      TrainNutter, to go along with that,
      Neither of those aircraft were powered by the reactor onboard. They were just flying test beds to prove the feasibility of airborne reactors. Both aircraft were powered by their original engines; the Tupolev with its turboprops and the Convair with its radials and jets. None of the engines were powered by the reactor.

  • @MalakaiBowman
    @MalakaiBowman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Do you mean the Tupolev Tu-95 LAL, because that was the nuclear powered variant of the original (not nuclear powered) Tu-95

    • @TheCyberCrewLD
      @TheCyberCrewLD 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kai Bowman Was going to say the same thing; the Tu-95 is just a turboprop bomber that’s still in service.

    • @bodan1196
      @bodan1196 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TheDJ, calling the Tu-95 "just a turboprop" is borderline insulting to... well... all of humanity. :-)
      It is a rather amazing piece of kit. It's not the best or perfect, but still... "just a turboprop"... ;-)

    • @TheCyberCrewLD
      @TheCyberCrewLD 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bo Dan Hah, you’re right. Quite a beast of a plane in itself!

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheCyberCrewLD It's a tad noisy, to say the least.

    • @kk-q
      @kk-q 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ههههه قاااا ماتفهم اللغه حقتي

  • @adityakhare9448
    @adityakhare9448 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Six words that are forbidden in NASA, "It worked in Kerbal Space Program."

  • @myla8483
    @myla8483 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My grandad worked on the Convair back in the 60s. thanks for this vid!

  • @kurtweinstein8450
    @kurtweinstein8450 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would love to see you try Real Solar System with Realism Overhaul. Should lead to a blooper reel like your first days playing the game.

  • @garrett6419
    @garrett6419 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hi your channel is awesome!!

  • @pistolpetepeterson
    @pistolpetepeterson 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the best part of the video was the plane rolling lol. i needed a good laugh before heading to my classes tonight

  • @myrmecologistjp9228
    @myrmecologistjp9228 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You know, I play ksp with RSS and RO and after a month of only plaing that it becomes easier

    • @chriskerwin3904
      @chriskerwin3904 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You just have to get used to it taking 5 minutes to get into orbit and burning past apogee on the second stage.

    • @myrmecologistjp9228
      @myrmecologistjp9228 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      chris kerwin Well, my fastest rocket to get to orbit took 6 min and the worst is not that , is that if you have over 200 mods it tooks loads of time to load and most of my rocket get to orbit before passing apogee

    • @chriskerwin3904
      @chriskerwin3904 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What kind of TWR are you using on the first and second stage? If the first stage is like 1.3 and the second is sub 1 or even sub .5 you have to burn for a long time. A solid state drive helps a lot with the load times.

    • @kurtweinstein8450
      @kurtweinstein8450 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try the Saturn V. Massive hydrogen stages with very low starting TWR. It is a slow ride to orbit.

    • @gioworno
      @gioworno 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I play RSSA with stock parts and my 22 ton rocket can make it to orbit, its not that hard

  • @beckster091
    @beckster091 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The cars in fallout are actually powered by nuclear fusion reactors, a technology we have yet to perfect.

  • @gamereditor59ner22
    @gamereditor59ner22 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice video!! I probably should try to build a spacecraft in KSP mod when I get the chance to buy it.

    • @personperson6022
      @personperson6022 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      information to learn if you have a pc don’t get it on ps4 because ps4 is missing so many things pc has, like personal parachutes for kerbals :(

    • @personperson6022
      @personperson6022 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone just liked that reply

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@personperson6022 I think personal parachutes are unlocked with tech, because I have PC version and I don't have personal parachutes.

    • @personperson6022
      @personperson6022 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Io oh

    • @personperson6022
      @personperson6022 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Io I have seen something that said like some sort of level kerbal has them but I’m not sure how to use or get them.

  • @juleswoodbury58
    @juleswoodbury58 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    the thing with thermo nuclear jet engines, is that they are so heavy you need a wide aspect ratio on the wings to get more lift for takeoff, but also if you want to enter the atmosphere of slightly larger planet with a thicker atmosphere to get use out of those engines you need a small aspect ratio to not burn up. The thing I do with nuclear jet engines in KSP is I bring my craft slightly under the Karman line and time war around the orbit until I get into a stable suborbital trajectory with apoapsis and periapsis both under the Karman line at roughly the same altitude. That usually slows the craft down enough to no suffer from the rigors of entry, it's aerobreaking but boring, and it can take up to 15 min realtime, doing nothing, to see it through, but it works. Also my wing design is usually ahedral (which on level decreases my aspect ratio but makes the craft highly maneuvrable at high speeds), high wing (as nuclear engines are heavy you need some sort of keel effect), tapered (delta or complex delta have to much drag imo) and pitched upwards (

  • @nguyentrinhquanganh1494
    @nguyentrinhquanganh1494 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Matt! Can you recreate the Sea Dragon rocket?

  • @codeviper8665
    @codeviper8665 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah, yes, "Nuclear" and "Passenger Plane," two words that are definitely meant to be in the same sentence

    • @dakauann
      @dakauann 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course not

  • @DavidNagy03ER
    @DavidNagy03ER 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Are those MODS. REEEEEEEEEE
    I’m kidding cool vid

  • @HappyBeezerStudios
    @HappyBeezerStudios 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At some point they noticed that nuclear reactors give off a lot of radiation. And that requires lots of shielding for the crew. Which means all the mass that could be used for payload is now lead and concrete.
    And thus the nuclear bomber was scrapped.

  • @vincentb5431
    @vincentb5431 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You should try to recreate the curiousity rover

    • @psun256
      @psun256 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow I actually haven't thought of that!

  • @soulewh
    @soulewh 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I watched a documentary where the leads scientists/engineers admitted the whole nuclear powered bomber was a bamboozle. Basically they believed the molten salt reactor was a better and safer design but the Navy had already pushed through with a closed loop design we know today because it was easier. So these guys convinced the Air Force they could make a lightweight reactor using molten salt as a medium to power and aircraft essentially indefinitely. All they wanted was to get funding to make and then prove their much safer design for nuclear power and it worked. It never got accepted for commercial power because it was more complex to build and the nuclear energy commission had already moved forward with the reactor designs. So don't feel too bad about the bamboozleness!

  • @LeonardoDaVinci01
    @LeonardoDaVinci01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your the best man

    • @niteshmurti
      @niteshmurti 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Leo 234777 you're*

    • @GoofiPlaysROBLOX
      @GoofiPlaysROBLOX 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@niteshmurti your reply is not necessary*

  • @superdave6889
    @superdave6889 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Matt Lowne
    Actually, a nuclear jet DOES require intake air, or an on-board supply of propellant that it can vaporize and spit out the back. it would be more correct to say that a nuke jet does not require intake OXYGEN. as it is not combusting the air, only superheating it.

  • @anthonypelchat
    @anthonypelchat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm surprised that you didn't try to go full ssto with those engines. That was my first thought while you were building it.

    • @eugenekrabsalt
      @eugenekrabsalt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a Computer Game

    • @eugenekrabsalt
      @eugenekrabsalt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Eugene Krabs woops i Responded to the wrong comment. Sorry

  • @abnormallylargefrog565
    @abnormallylargefrog565 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I discovered this youtube channel today. And I love it. THIS IS MY FAVORITE CHANNEL LIKE HOW IS YOUR CHANNEL SO SMALL?! Also, can you make like uhhhhhhh flying saucer or try to?

  • @gusthecreator386
    @gusthecreator386 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Mat do a warp ship plz (like if you agree)

    • @rogerc7960
      @rogerc7960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      instagram.com/p/Botk0sJlwS4 pbs.twimg.com/media/DolzAweXgAA26kt?format=jpg

    • @goodgenes0
      @goodgenes0 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This sh of a man who has a high school musical career has a man that has been the real life for a man of the real world with the true man and a true life man who has a long peninsula of the world and is the man of a true life and a man

    • @GoofiPlaysROBLOX
      @GoofiPlaysROBLOX 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goodgenes0 oh using mobile phrases it displays i do that sometimes lol

    • @goodgenes0
      @goodgenes0 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      GoofiPlays - ROBLOX and a woman of a woman

    • @goodgenes0
      @goodgenes0 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      GoofiPlays - ROBLOX and a woman of a woman a lady of the day the daughter and a mother and stepfather were not a mother of the mother and stepfather of a mother of the man of a church that was a mother and stepfather of a church that has no children who have no idea how much she has up for them and she has a great idea that she has no sense to be the first person who has a mother or the mother and is not a man who has a problem and a problem that has no reason for me not being a good person to me that my husband and my son and the father are not a god of my son or a brother of the father and I am a brother and I have a lot to do and have the best present ever to the man who will have the best husband ever I hope he will have to work out a lot more for this one he is the best and the most amazing person ever I have a great man I hope you are happy with this great man you have the most amazing penis

  • @stickman3214
    @stickman3214 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just FYI, the TU-95 was already in service as a turboprop powered bomber before the Soviets attempted to convert it to nuclear power. The American attempt was also already in service as the piston powered B-36.

    • @AirJimInCT
      @AirJimInCT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stickman and none of the test aircraft were ever actually powered by the reactor on board.

  • @Mike23443
    @Mike23443 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    6:10
    I swear to god, if I hear one more person pronounce "k" in the word "ancient", I'll turn into modern day Hitler and start World War 3

    • @raphaelsanbar3569
      @raphaelsanbar3569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mike234 how the hell do you hear a “k”

    • @Mike23443
      @Mike23443 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With my ears. He keeps saying enkshent.

    • @keshavsrivastava1956
      @keshavsrivastava1956 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is British so his accent is like that now come on chill

  • @Helperbot-2000
    @Helperbot-2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    heads up!
    the tu 95 is simply a strategic bomber, the tu 95LAL is the name of the experimental nuclear aircraft

  • @ardap3966
    @ardap3966 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    0 view,32 comment.Well...

  • @alexbuss3377
    @alexbuss3377 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Convair b-36 modified to fly and potentially test the idea of flying using nuclear power, it did fly with the reactor, but the reactor was only turned one once in flight.

  • @nw2683
    @nw2683 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    early discord squad

  • @BradleyWhistance
    @BradleyWhistance 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why don't we just bring a few packets of fresh, never frozen O2 to Eve and then we can all SSTO easily and efficiently.

    • @misterx7898
      @misterx7898 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      awesome comment from an awesome person that brought an awesome ssto to the awesome planet EVE.

  • @tf3confirmedbuthv54
    @tf3confirmedbuthv54 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Last

  • @XavierBetoN
    @XavierBetoN 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Matt Lowne, there is a mod called Stock Size Real Solar System,
    I use it since i installed the KSP. Simply 5 times easier real solar system. Improves the gameplay a lot.
    note that the only issue i had was it doesn't work beyond 1.4.5 as i tried. I haven't tried to install further than 1.6 but mod credits say it's for 1.3

  • @randomguy0047
    @randomguy0047 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Meanwhile, in the background:
    Jeb: * exhilarated kerbal noises *

  • @thulx3997
    @thulx3997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *Instruction unclear, ended up sending nuclear rocket(s) onto the surface of Eve.*

  • @cipher88101
    @cipher88101 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    On the plus side, you can pop your popcorn in your lap while sitting in coach. Of course the downside would be the glow.

  • @greatgruff1442
    @greatgruff1442 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enough tangents to form a circle! Well done.

  • @dataletra
    @dataletra 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just because you put the Intro music in the Description I liked the vid!
    Good vid as well

  • @LeonardoDaVinci01
    @LeonardoDaVinci01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Content is great, keep up the good work!

  • @vwr0527
    @vwr0527 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's a chance you could've entered Eve's atmosphere without overheating. What you needed to do was to use those nuclear rockets to slow down as much as possible, as close to Eve as possible (slightly within Eve's atmosphere, even), and keep firing them until you're close to zero relative velocity with Eve's atmosphere. Then you'll just drop down like a feather. Or a brick. Depending on if your wings get sheared off from pulling up too hard in a steep dive.

  • @Luka_3D
    @Luka_3D 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The moment he said "date" I was like "Fedora tip for you good sir" 😂😂

    • @trouty7947
      @trouty7947 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao I just laughed when after he said his date was Friday and then said he likes a "quiet Saturday morning" not likely if everything went well with the date

  • @jacobsquartzminecart7632
    @jacobsquartzminecart7632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this mildly reminds me of the CL-1201, the biggest aircraft never built.

    • @aplane9625
      @aplane9625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve heard of that

  • @helmuthvonmoltke3727
    @helmuthvonmoltke3727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok I've got my reactor about 100 feet away, shooting it as I comment. Loaded incendiary rounds in my .50 cal. Shooting, it started smoking, it's getting kind of hot, OH SHII

  • @epikmanthe3rd
    @epikmanthe3rd 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot Project Pluto. A cruise missile powered by an unshielded fission reactor.

  • @agustinmurat6169
    @agustinmurat6169 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Matt using parts mods ! I always knew the world was geting moar and more crazy...

  • @dancing_stalin_1232
    @dancing_stalin_1232 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like to watch these videos at 3 am

  • @erikf.7377
    @erikf.7377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The formation of a mushroom cloud only depends on the size of the explosion not by what caused it.

  • @spacenoodles5570
    @spacenoodles5570 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should put a return vehicle into that cargo bay, and launch it in-flight, so you can escape eve's atmasphere

  • @Booster123Rocket
    @Booster123Rocket 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how he's just talking and the craft exploded.

  • @ihatemyoriginalusername5920
    @ihatemyoriginalusername5920 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome aboard KSP Air, We'll be flying through space today

  • @ethanferie7270
    @ethanferie7270 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how you can make up to anything and let it go in space like that in KSP

  • @diamondjub2318
    @diamondjub2318 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Unfiltered Starlight from the lovely Constellations above you is full of DEADLY RADIATION! Help yourself to some of our complementary SPF 3000 Starblock, and by complementary, we mean quite expensive...

  • @un1kum42
    @un1kum42 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The greatest part was when you had to run after your plane that was rolling away. Laughed my ass off.

  • @abhilashasinha5186
    @abhilashasinha5186 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:49 in the rss space is really easy to approach just a medium sized booster can get you to space

  • @rhetts.9026
    @rhetts.9026 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What you have to do on Eve is turn the speed warp to 4, and then get some popcorn while waiting for your ship to stop moving :)

  • @Taipan-nu9iy
    @Taipan-nu9iy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, guess imma go to Fukushima with my Glock then, wish me luck Matt!

  • @shepardalt760
    @shepardalt760 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Behold! The atomic dreams of 1950s mad scientists! There are absolutely no bamboozles in this video I promise you."
    Hmm mmm, I believe it.