Don't Threaten Me ! Dave Fights SC Judge
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ค. 2023
- Don't Threaten Me ! Dave Fights SC Judge #SupremeCourt #LawChakra
Courtesy:- Supreme Court of India.
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- eqnuire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YpQnHoQvZt4/mqdefault.jpg)
Central govt should abolish the collegium system and form a commite to select the judges considering efficiency, honestyness and characters etc. since presently lot of discrepancies arised in SC.
And you think they will choose them honestly? Its funny
Collegium is not the perfect system, but far better than the government appointing a committee to select the judges.
Could not agree more. However, in keeping with our penchant to try and cut corners/influence peddling and our political interference, pf which there seems no end. will committee who is beholden to some [person/political party etc., be expected to be fair in their selection. At the present moment, the Collegium System, where at least some form of fairness exists seems to me to be the best.
The Collegium at present has no axe to grind. The canard being bandied about, that this system is archaic and non feasible, is laughable at best.
Just read the remarks that the present government's ministers and the Prime Ministers statements made recently. They are trying to convert an Independent Judiciary to one that is beholden to its political masters.
There was no collegium system in 70 s and appointments were in control of govt.Was everything fine then?
@@agsitaraman3270
Definitely not. Indira Gandhi used to appoint judges according to her sweet will. She overlooked the seniority of HR Khanna and appointed Baig as the CJ because Khanna had given a couple of judgements embarrassing the government. Collegium system is far better than the executive meddling in their appointment. Montesquieu had a point when he observed that the three wings of the government should function separately.
Few judges are given the cases against the govt. perhaps with certain motive not for their extertise or wisdom in the matter.
Such advocates make Supreme court fish market.
How? Do you have any knowledge, judges making SC as BJP's office
Citizens have no role in selecting judges, you cant question them ,you cant criticize them you can just surrender yourself in front of my lords 😅😅.
😂
Kapil Sibal, Dave, Prashant Bhushan are self appointed divine advocates.
Kapil Sibal is average, but Dave and Prashant Bhushan are really intelligent and brilliant advocates
Why judges become irresponsible to threaten the advocates when they raise the issues of pending cases. Never court had come to such lo.
Good News.
Top court has finally decide this case. See the order. 🧐🤔🙏
Complilation nahi, compliance.
Perception is interpreted as law.
May Almighty God save our systems from Lap Dog 🐶🐕Syndrome!
What is extra power for CJI court on judicial side? Dave was shopping for it? Dave is welcome to enact some tear jerking as he did when Remana retired when his favourite forum also get dismantled by father time, unless collegium exercise their sky high powers adopt the American model of judges retirement age as till death. Cabels are forming in the courts and favours rule the roost 😮😮😮
Nothing good is expected from the system of a state like Gujurat
This fellor D dave is exceeding the limit!? 😮he should be shown the right place!? 😮
Justice Shah is retiring on May 15th not April 15. It was stated wrong in last sentence of the video.
This is noted
The Judges think that they are Bhagaban
NEED JUDICIAL REFORM NOW, PLEASE, BJP HAS THE NUMBERS, PLEASE DO IT NOW. THE COUNTRY NEEDS AND EXPECTS THIS NOW. ALSO BRING THE CAA AND NRC NOW. JAI HIND
15th May not 15th April, will be the last working day of Judge Shah
Said supreme court,CJI, Chandhrachudiji,na.maskar, court building ache plan official constrution department tender immidaitely sanction praise completed like Balaji raju
Jai friends Supreme court,new building cen.govt tender apply, praise sanction! Borosa like Balaji raju
CJI apneko aurangzeb sochke baitha. Betaz badshah.
Why Mr.Dave who feels he is Extraordinary Advocate joined the bench instead of criticizing the SC
Yes. He is self righteous freek . All Lutyen lawyers are like that. They even threaten to have their way in the past. Indira JaiSingh threatened SC judges during JNU students case, Dhavan in Ayodhya case etc.
Saare ghamandi sifarishiyoan ki aukat saamne aa rahi hai. Enjoy the show
Atleast someone ? The judiciary
Is ko gharma gharmi boltay hai😂😂😂
Mujay laga hathapayi hogayi hai i was waiting for video
From the Government side any arguments between the litigation in respect of contract matters where one side Government and another side private persons, first should be fixed with affidavits of the concerned official along with oral arguments. The governmenhave to acts as a true person by way of affidavit to binding on words.
Dushyant Dave is very serious and good advocate and a no nonsense counsel,, when another bench of CJI is already seized with similar case with larger issue involved, justice Shah must not have hurried, even if he belongs to Gujarat,, there was another Mohit Shah a CJ of Maharashtra HC connected with judge loya suspicious death case alleged to provide 100 crores if family of loya keeps mum ,,, things are not good in spaIn
If everything goes in their favour. Not know how he wanted Arnab not to be heard by Sri Chandrachud though Arnab was arrested illegally and even tried to harm him!?
Not April , it will be may
That is noted
S c mein aisa bhi koi vakil karega iski kalpana bhi nahi the. Aise halat to district courts me aam baat hai.
It is unfortunate
Funny. People are anxious to k own what is the criteria for selection and appointments of judges by collegium
No disrespect. But no respect for SC.
Collegium ka chora kyon?
Rahul Gandhi has been rightly given punishment rather he should have been given much harsh punishment a baiter of nation deserve.
Dave is a criminal and should be dealt with accordingly.
Cji has lost all respects because of his stupidity in promoting US woke nonsense in Bharat....
Madam. Gud Eve. Please Correct this immediately. Justice M R.Shah will be retiring On 15th may 2023. Not as mentioned by you April 15 th. Last working day of M R Shah. Change it. 😄😄😄
Thanks for pointing noted
Dave will lose reputation very soon.
"Senior advocate" Dave needs to get off his high horse fast. Here, he wasn't putting forth his arguments when he asked, "Why are my lordships in a hurry to dispose of this...?" He was, in fact, casting implicit aspersions on Justice Shah's integrity by questioning his motive. Justice Shah, therefore, needs to be commended for his controlled outburst and for asking Dave to "argue on merits". Moreover, since when has it become a rule that if the CJI is hearing a particular case, other SC judges should delay pronouncing verdicts on similar matters? And if Dave wanted the current case delayed on that ground, he could have argued his case that way; instead, he started mud-slinging. I have often noticed that some of the so-called senior advocates (and Dave would probably score heavily on this front) resort to theatrics--like bullying the judges or trying their patience with caustic remarks--to hide their own inefficiency when going gets tough for them in the court.
U are totally wrong, Justice Shah has publicly said that modi is a hero when he was a judge, Dave critisized this in one of his interviews. That is why Justice Shah was behaving rudely with Dave so as to settle personal scores........... which is totally unacceptable since a judge needs to be unbiased
Dave is honest and knowledgeable.
Dave is full of himself and egoistic
Spot On
Upright Lawyer
Arrogant, self righteous freek. How he wanted Arnab is in jail on not being heard because he hates him though not guilty!? You know nothing about these Lutyen lawyers who used to threaten CJIs also. They hate Gogoi whom they not able to influence especially on Ayodhya issue which they wanted to postpone to help Khangress.
Stop live streaming of all court room proceeding including Supreme Court of India till live streaming of happenings of interaction with PM, all CMs, council of ministers, all cabinet ministers (centre and states) is done. Why their interactions should not be known to the people of India.
Absolutely on target.
Their lordship themselves out that restraint on them...sc court judgement..
Blame the law....or maybe praise the english law.
he should respect Honarable Supreme Court. it doesn't who he is and how much experience he has.
Not all who hold high office are deserving of respect..some behave arrogant, biased, just because they have power! I personally hold Dushyant Dave in v.high regard, higher than some SC judges who have acted despicably in the past!
Dave is a courageous advocate & right person.
Video presenter speaks so rapidly on such a complex legal subject that we are unable to understand. Can't you anchors use pauses and speak slowly lucidly?
Lately Dushyant Dave seems to think that he has descended from above and can lord over everyone. He has been writing rude letters, delivering talks denigrating the judiciary. One cannot understand why the Supreme Court tolerates misconduct of seasoned lawyers who ought to be role models for others by their conduct. A couple of years back, Rajiv Dhawan had also quarrelled with the judges.
Dave is criticised because he fights cases against the government unlike Harish Salve. Seasoned lawyers play psychological games to intimidate the judges. Ram Jethmalani was a pastmaster at this game. The judges have massive egos despite giving blatantly stupid judgements from time to time. It's necessary to prick it from time to time.
Atleast someone is ? the judiciary.
@@josephjames859. well said, and who better to prick at some utterly shameless pro-Modi-Gujerat judges! Towards his end, Ram J., wanting a clearer conscience, let loose a very true and justified tirade against Modani & Co. Shame on our justice system…which it seems can also be manipulated!
Just like the executive and parliament, judiciary is also a pillar of democracy and is under constitution. If executive and parliament can be critisized, why can't citizens constructively critisize the judiciary? Even judiciary has specified that constructive critisizm is allowed. I am a supporter of collegium system, but I am against selection of incompetent judges to SC
Dave has a superiority complex and seems that this channel is a fan of him .
Feedback taken thanks for watching
seems like u hate his guys
Seems, you are BJP bhakt, talk facts
Keep the good fight going, Mr Dave . Even our SC needs a watchdog as the SC has let down the Constitution badly 😢
Would you mind explaining, with facts and examples, as to when and how the SC "has let down the constitution badly"?
Mr Dave thinks that his congress government appointed judges should listen to whatever he argues before the court
CJI being so inclined to certain powers, it is but natural Mr Dave wants to quote what happens in his court
Tera najariya hai bahut " bakra"
Dave was arguing on merit only
Dave is Mental and he has proven time and again
What is Dave's point?If he is worried for bigger cases and thinks this case to be apetty one then why does he accept this case.Usually vakils argue to dispose their cases early if there is 100% merit. Here Dave argues in different manner. What is harm if the case is heard early.
Miss Anchor Justice Shah is very much right. We don't listen your narration.
We are just telling as it happened in court
"We don't listen your narration" ....we who ? You are a judge?
@@adityadwivedi7672 yes
@@TheSwaraj and you phrase sentences like "we don't listen your narration" ? OK, good then.
they r reporting. U r judging. Check ur brains
Dave is doing his job as good as CJI fighting for justice
Both are wokes
👨⚖️Judges working under BJP
Judges save BJP not Constitution
BJP destroyed everything, even to judiciary😢
Anybody should behave properly before the court. Let it be anybody or any senior advocate. The judiciary is the only institution, existing with some repute.
Lol .....who told you....only army has good reputation. These judiciary system is mockery of indian democracy....and these judges are not demigods.
Daves superiority comes from his deep learning and intent.He is the only lawyer who stakes everything when recent events show judges from session court, high court and even a couple of justices from SC buckle and succumb to unnecessary pressure tactics and plum posting offer post retirement from the govt. The present govt instead of minding 8ts own business influences and pressurises justices at all levels.
🎉🎉Very well said. This is what is happening, at all stages❤❤