i ended up in a drunk tank here in canada and some Poor jail guard went to ukraine to "fight the good fight" now i see his sad parents they lost their only son on for no reason.
Zelensky is a clown pretending to be someone important. Russia's advances on Ukraine last month amounted to the size of Singapore and was its largest territorial gain since the first weeks of the conflict. Research conducted by Agence France-Presse (AFP), using data from the American Institute for the Study of War (ISW), found that the Russian army seized more than 725 square kilometers (279.9 square miles) of land in Ukraine during November. The area is larger than Singapore, which covers around 719 square kilometers (277.6 square miles).
In an article Zelensky has claimed ukraine has suffered "much less" than 80000 KIA, yet in the same breath will say how ukraine cannot find enough soldiers for the frontline and needs more money, lmao which one is it buddy?
That's the same with most of them, e.g. Jake Broe. They claim all the time how R. is getting completly wrecked and has little left. But at the same time, they always demand more help for U. Coupled with the thread, that otherwise R. would attack us later. And neither of their viewers realize, that both claims are mutually exclusive. If one of them is true, the other can't be true at the same time. But to be fair, mutually exclusive claims are not a U. only thing.
@@scallen3841they are... 60 thousand charges have been laid. They also said they won't prosecute 1st offences, so that means the 60 thousand are probably repeat offenders
Surprisingly, no-one seems to talk about the actual numbers if Ukraine does lower the age to 18. Even before the war that age group was the smallest in the 0 to 60 years range. Ukraine has this dent in the age pyramid. Some of these people have already joined as volunteers .Much more of them escaped. I have seen estimates as low as 5000 per year of age which means 40 000 or so new conscripts. This is 5% of the current army strength. I very much doubt that would help. As reported by the Ukrainians themselves, they need 30 000 every month to replenish losses 'and increase the army' (thus denying the casualty rate) Weeb, maybe you can do a video about that. You are good with numbers.
@@asntsoldier9921 Most are running away, though. Someone told me the plane he was on, coming from Poland to the US, was mostly full of young Ukrainians
That assumes even the remaining ones will just go quietly. Young men aren't known for cooperating with authorities they don't respect and don't think they have their interests at heart.
Actually I think that Russian goals territorialy are far more than just the 4 oblast. They want a strong border which means the Dniepr river, and they want all the regions with russians people so it means Novorussia (southern half of Ukraine).
It's one thing to take an area, and another to keep it. Frankly, I don't think Russia wants the hassle of keeping it if they can keep NATO out by other means.
@@VikOlliver i would agree with you but they managed to keep Tchetchenia. Yes I agree that if they had another way they would use it, however they saw that agreements with Nato are worthless as they dont keep their words so controlling the land itself is necessary.
1010 days of Russians walking into well fortified positions, driving into minefields, oil industry suffering constant damage, economy in free fall and they are 20-30km further forwards. Pointless illegal invasion which was ill conceived, incompetently carried out.
It seems Ukraine has no air defence left except around Kiev and probably Kharkiv and Odessa but on actual frontline Russia can just FAB their way through that means NATO has no surplus AA defence to sent.Kinzhel and Mr. Iskander did their job very good.
It is interesting that Ukraine no longer is risking it's air defence Patriots near the frontline as they did previously until a few launchers were destroyed. There have been no recent reports of significsnt Russian airforce casualties. Fab glide bombs are effective but the bombers can be intercepted, just, by Patriots near the frontline but Ukraine is no longer doing this.
No such thing as surplus AA. NATO never expected to use their AA for more than downing a rogue plane or two, they always had very few launchers and even less ammo for them given that that stuff is expensive af. Letting the Ukies have some of their Patriots significantly weakened NATO AA.
True, the west over sold its much hype weapons technology only to find out that they are extremely vulnerable. First it was the German Leopard 2A6 tanks, Bradley IFVs, Challenger 2 and Abram A1M1 tanks
There was a hype for the himars missile systems and storm shadow cruise missiles that failed, then the much anticipated F16s, recently atacms. All talk, no proven results. On the other hand, Russia has adapted and constantly changes it tactics on the field, the bear in Russia has come out plus Iskander, enough said.
NATO is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc.
If they only lost 80k 3k of that was in krynky leaving 77k meaning in 3 years of war they are losing 25k a month yet if I remember right someone said they needed 20k a month minimum to replace dead and wounded
Modern equipment does not mean it is better than what is actually being used on the battlefield . Modern just means new not that is is better than what was there before. The Russian FABs are out performing a lot of the so called modern weapons , and the modified shaheed drones have become critical. What this war as highlighted is hat it is the effectiveness of the weapons whether old or young.
I think the best example is in artillery. Krasnopol has outperformed "modern" weapons like the Excalibur guided munitions. Or even the old Soviet field guns from WWII have shown they are more durable and every bit as capable as M777 or even some SPG that have been praised for years. The war has shown that there is more hype in western weapons than anyone believed before this conflict. It exposed their extreme limitations. Even Iskander and Tornado S have outperformed HIMARS by a long shot. Including in one on one engagement.
@@The_Prince_Of_Crows There is also the Gepard that proved very "modern" air defense against drones and was supposed obsolete anti air defense. Artillery problem is you have to change barrels often,rustic artillery can shoot more times before you have to change barrel. IN short western weapons are accurate but need heavy maintenance and industrial production.
"Those dirty American got our data numbers wrong, our defense forces suffer losses less than 80,000 men since February 2022. While the orc suffered 50 times dead more than us, trust me" - Volodymyr Bonarparte addressing to recent "rUsSiAn pRoPaGaNdA🤡"
i disagree all the big mouth NATO nations cannot keep up with weapons productions and the best they did was a 300k in war games and half that were support units...and all their army's are in bad shape and never fought a high end war so there is no chance of NATO beating Russia on the ground game !!
The truth is, Zelensky will be changed then everything will be done. Zelensky can just resign anytime. A new leader is likely to not pursue NATO and concede territories.
Zelenski has overstayed his constitutional term. By definition, Ukraine is now under a usurper in control of the State military.... it's a neo-nazi military junta now... and the west still props it up.
That's not counting all the children,,,women and old men caught up in this meat grinder that the one world government cabal calls an invasion.... Blackrock (CIA) is just waiting to get in to Ukraine and with taxpayers money rebuild what the NATO countries r responsible for annihilating and absolutely destroying
West has no chance (we stick to conventional) we have lost majority of ecupment allready in the field, we have no battlefield doctrine, moast soldiers are just traind to be contra terrorist swat, and moast crucial; the populous are not motivated
people tend to overestimate us possibility to send weapons to ukraine, they need to not just double down, but essentially send third and even half of their equipment to actually make a difference, im talking about thousands tanks, hundreds airplanes etc., and they WONT do it because it will make the us itself vulnerable. And even if they would, where they will store all these piles of equipment? how they will ship it? there is no way they could hide these enormous caravans from russian rockets, im not even talking about constant flow of parts for repairs, about engineers they would need to send with the equipment! this will never happen
It’s not about equipment it’s like it stuck in everyone’s head give them more, give them more. Wars are won with manpower not machines only. If there isn’t enough personnel to operate these weapons what good is more? All that will happen is acres of new equipment sitting in parking lots with no one to use them. That’s the facts. It seems to escape those here on the west.
BREAKING: Regime change all oever the world: Now also in South Korea. As very accurately predicted the US empire thrashes about ever more wildly and triggers chaos and anarchy globally. This is the dying phase of a Hegemon.
It is December 2029, Russian forces finish clearing operations after a major Ukrainian insurgency in Lvov. After years of fierce fighting and stubborness, and a botched nuclear program cutting off western support, the ukrainian lines collapsed in 2027. Hundreds of thousands of tired Ukrainian soldiers without ammunition and lack of will surrendered in hordes. The Russian war machine prevails even after massive losses. The Ukraine's population has plummeted to 18 million, most of them live in the east and donetsk. The Ukrainian spirit is fully broken, the capable men and women have fled west. The remaining people are either pro russians or disheartened and tired Ukrainians. Millions of ethnic russians find work in lucrative wages offered by the kremlin to rebuild the Ukraine. Overtime, the Ukrainians engineered their destruction. Now, they are numbering at a mere 8 million people, mostly middle aged and old peoples. Now a diaspora similar to the jews, the Ukrainian flag is lowered in Lvov one last time.
Using FAB's to take out apartment complexes is rather drastic. What you take is completely destroyed. They wont have enough bodies to occupy the area once the war is done. Where have the people gone that used to live there? Are they hostages in Ukraine? Or did they go to Russia?
t doesn't matter who the US president is, Kursk will never be a subject of negotiations on the Russian side. Ukrainians are mistaken if they think they will be able to use their presence in the Kursk region as an advantage. The Ukrainian Kursk offensive actually suits the Russians in the current situation because this is not a blitzkrieg war but a war of attrition. The Ukrainian Kursk Offensive is the biggest mistake they made in this war.
I believe President Trump will set a level of support with Ukraine, which won't give Ukraine everything they want but enough to maintain them and will present a peace plan. If Ukraine doesn't, except that's aid will decrease if Russia doesn't, except the aid will increase.
NOTHING the US can supply will make the slightest bit of difference to Ukraine. They simply do not have the weapons available to send. Russia's tactics are such that they are bulldozing the Ukr/army into constant retreat as they take enormous causalities. Trump has NOTHING to negotiate with - except the fact that Putin would like to see an end to the conflict - BUT NOT WITHOUT ACHIEVING THE RUSSIAN OBJECTIVES.
Don't forget what weasels politicians are. If Trump can use Ukraine to hurt Russia while looking like a domestic hero and boosting the 'defense' industry, he will.
At this point do you think that any amount of US aid would be able to change anything? You would just empty your stocks and take 10-15 years to restore it
They wont controll 50% at any time. They fight against heavy defended fortresses - thats why they are very slow. And you can See a Change in russian military tactics over the Last 3 years. But controlling 50%? Ukraine will capitulate after the fall of pokrowsk. Dont forget, that Trump will start His presidency in january. And His Focus is Not even Close to the Ukraine. And we germans cant fill the Gap the US leaves (I think our goverment will try it, but will fail cause of our collapsing Economy)
You assume that every piece of territory that the Russians take will have to be taken by military force. A massive chunk of territory will be taken at the negotiation table, I imagine.
what are Russian citizens thoughts about the war, I can understand Russia as a country not wanting Nato on their door step and Ukraines treatment of ethnic Russians along the border, but are the citizens dedicated to the cause?
You can gauge their views by the facts that Russia has not had to have a second round of mobilization since the one in September 2022. For the past 18 months, it's seen a steady flow of volunteers, to the tune of 30,000 a month. Another way of assessing the Russians' views is their degree of support for Putin: steady at 78-80% (it varies a bit depending on the month the poll is taken).
@ wow.. 30k a month is massive. i’d be hesitant to volunteer knowing that if they require 30k a month that would mean there is massive casualties just churning out death. absolute shame no idea how zelensky hasn’t been strung up in the main square by his own ppl. how does he live with so much blood on his hands.
@@leonidas6682 Frontline contract pays a lot of money, so much in fact, you could easily save enough money to buy 2 living rooms apartment. As for political views...in the last 2 years, most people changed their opinion as soon they spoken with pro-ukrainian nationalists, brainwashed masses and what they did. For example removal of russian classic literature from european libraries, as authors from 18 centuries was directly involved in current politics.
@@leonidas6682 They are not losing 30k a month or anything like it, the huge numbers simply mean that Russian front line units get relieved and rotated more often, while fresh troops gain battle experience on less active fronts. A lot of those volunteers also go into relatively safe logistic as support units
How often do we have to repeat that russia is not fighting Ukraine, but Nato. They trained, supported, armed ukrain or do you think ukrain makes all these weapons themselves or you think ukraine does the ISR with satellites they don’t have?
Why would Russia want the sanctions removed? Eventually but not yet. They have been such a useful tool in expanding the economy and guaranteeing which markets are reliable and loyal. Russia should demand that they continue at least for several more months, if not years. But it's getting cold in western Europe. . .
@vaska1999 Yes, but one of the sanctions was it capped the price of oil to like $45.00 (us) for a barrel of oil. The US always goes to defund a country to cripple them.
i ended up in a drunk tank here in canada and some Poor jail guard went to ukraine to "fight the good fight" now i see his sad parents they lost their only son on for no reason.
Not for "no reason" ... He sacrificed himself on the alter of western psychopath elite.
For Black Rock
@@rainer7210 yea his parents done care.
Man that’s terrible.
@@rainer7210Total agree
Zelensky is a clown pretending to be someone important. Russia's advances on Ukraine last month amounted to the size of Singapore and was its largest territorial gain since the first weeks of the conflict. Research conducted by Agence France-Presse (AFP), using data from the American Institute for the Study of War (ISW), found that the Russian army seized more than 725 square kilometers (279.9 square miles) of land in Ukraine during November. The area is larger than Singapore, which covers around 719 square kilometers (277.6 square miles).
Territorial gains are less relevant than the attrition of the Ukrainian army. This process is evloving faster than territorial gains.
And the number of soldiers involved is clearly less than 30,000 and possibly less than 20,000.
In an article Zelensky has claimed ukraine has suffered "much less" than 80000 KIA, yet in the same breath will say how ukraine cannot find enough soldiers for the frontline and needs more money, lmao which one is it buddy?
He also says the Ukraine troops are deserting at an alarming rate
That's the same with most of them, e.g. Jake Broe.
They claim all the time how R. is getting completly wrecked and has little left.
But at the same time, they always demand more help for U. Coupled with the thread, that otherwise R. would attack us later.
And neither of their viewers realize, that both claims are mutually exclusive.
If one of them is true, the other can't be true at the same time.
But to be fair, mutually exclusive claims are not a U. only thing.
@@scallen3841they are... 60 thousand charges have been laid. They also said they won't prosecute 1st offences, so that means the 60 thousand are probably repeat offenders
@lethalschannel2759 there is a video of Ukraine prisoners of war stating they were told they will be shot if they ran away
The number of amputees and incaoacity is huge.
Surprisingly, no-one seems to talk about the actual numbers if Ukraine does lower the age to 18. Even before the war that age group was the smallest in the 0 to 60 years range. Ukraine has this dent in the age pyramid. Some of these people have already joined as volunteers .Much more of them escaped. I have seen estimates as low as 5000 per year of age which means 40 000 or so new conscripts. This is 5% of the current army strength. I very much doubt that would help. As reported by the Ukrainians themselves, they need 30 000 every month to replenish losses 'and increase the army' (thus denying the casualty rate)
Weeb, maybe you can do a video about that. You are good with numbers.
17 years old can enlist willingly
@@asntsoldier9921 Most are running away, though. Someone told me the plane he was on, coming from Poland to the US, was mostly full of young Ukrainians
That assumes even the remaining ones will just go quietly. Young men aren't known for cooperating with authorities they don't respect and don't think they have their interests at heart.
Actually I think that Russian goals territorialy are far more than just the 4 oblast.
They want a strong border which means the Dniepr river, and they want all the regions with russians people so it means Novorussia (southern half of Ukraine).
All the pro russians left these areas in 2014
It's one thing to take an area, and another to keep it. Frankly, I don't think Russia wants the hassle of keeping it if they can keep NATO out by other means.
@@VikOlliver i would agree with you but they managed to keep Tchetchenia. Yes I agree that if they had another way they would use it, however they saw that agreements with Nato are worthless as they dont keep their words so controlling the land itself is necessary.
1010 days of Russians walking into well fortified positions, driving into minefields, oil industry suffering constant damage, economy in free fall and they are 20-30km further forwards. Pointless illegal invasion which was ill conceived, incompetently carried out.
I believe that is the best scenario
It seems Ukraine has no air defence left except around Kiev and probably Kharkiv and Odessa but on actual frontline Russia can just FAB their way through that means NATO has no surplus AA defence to sent.Kinzhel and Mr. Iskander did their job very good.
FABs are unstoppable.
It is interesting that Ukraine no longer is risking it's air defence Patriots near the frontline as they did previously until a few launchers were destroyed. There have been no recent reports of significsnt Russian airforce casualties. Fab glide bombs are effective but the bombers can be intercepted, just, by Patriots near the frontline but Ukraine is no longer doing this.
No such thing as surplus AA. NATO never expected to use their AA for more than downing a rogue plane or two, they always had very few launchers and even less ammo for them given that that stuff is expensive af. Letting the Ukies have some of their Patriots significantly weakened NATO AA.
Yeah air defense are quite uselss against fabs it's hard to calculate their trajectory.
And even then whatever Western AD left are shit against missiles, at best they can only shot down slow UAV.
The proxy war is lost.
Russia will not negociate on Kursk. He just let Kursk to be because it consumes many Ukrainian resources.
Like Krynki in the left bank in kherson oblast
No Western weapon is trending any more in Ukraine. Not even the over hyped F16.
even the saint javelin that the fanatics are overhyped before.
True, the west over sold its much hype weapons technology only to find out that they are extremely vulnerable. First it was the German Leopard 2A6 tanks, Bradley IFVs, Challenger 2 and Abram A1M1 tanks
There was a hype for the himars missile systems and storm shadow cruise missiles that failed, then the much anticipated F16s, recently atacms. All talk, no proven results. On the other hand, Russia has adapted and constantly changes it tactics on the field, the bear in Russia has come out plus Iskander, enough said.
@@Jonas-s4c Its not like those weapons are bad or ineffective. In any large scale of war numbers are above quality, you need to supply constantly.
Western and Ukrainian hype has been cringe AF, LOTR references, saint javelin, himarsOClock, free the leopards, let the missiles do the talking.
NATO is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria etc.
Odessa ? It's hard to believe Russia will leave it out. The British navy was there not so long ago.
The British navy? Is that a boat? A raft?
@@severianmonk7394 The Russian Navy 😂
I like the broad political speculation examining the various options of the different parties. Very good.
Thanks for the update Weeb,
If they only lost 80k 3k of that was in krynky leaving 77k meaning in 3 years of war they are losing 25k a month yet if I remember right someone said they needed 20k a month minimum to replace dead and wounded
I don't understand your math? You wanted to say 2,5k a month?
@ yeah sorry my fat fingers
@@ScottJohnson-h3k np, i understood the general meaning.
Old plan: “I have a victory plan”
New plan: “Hang on until Trump’s inauguration” 🙃
Shovel>>>leopard 2
Modern equipment does not mean it is better than what is actually being used on the battlefield . Modern just means new not that is is better than what was there before. The Russian FABs are out performing a lot of the so called modern weapons , and the modified shaheed drones have become critical. What this war as highlighted is hat it is the effectiveness of the weapons whether old or young.
FAB and Shaed are kinda of new... They created guided kits for old bombs. Still there is some part of innovation in those weapons.
I think the best example is in artillery. Krasnopol has outperformed "modern" weapons like the Excalibur guided munitions. Or even the old Soviet field guns from WWII have shown they are more durable and every bit as capable as M777 or even some SPG that have been praised for years. The war has shown that there is more hype in western weapons than anyone believed before this conflict. It exposed their extreme limitations. Even Iskander and Tornado S have outperformed HIMARS by a long shot. Including in one on one engagement.
@@The_Prince_Of_Crows There is also the Gepard that proved very "modern" air defense against drones and was supposed obsolete anti air defense. Artillery problem is you have to change barrels often,rustic artillery can shoot more times before you have to change barrel. IN short western weapons are accurate but need heavy maintenance and industrial production.
So much needless death and destruction. They couldn't sit down together and talk and work something out that they could both live with?
Boris johnson has lost his proxy war
Thanks for the update 🎉🎉🎉
Another great report thanks Weeb
Nothing and nowhere to advance or retreat, its a common grave.
Tak for opdatering.
"Those dirty American got our data numbers wrong, our defense forces suffer losses less than 80,000 men since February 2022. While the orc suffered 50 times dead more than us, trust me" - Volodymyr Bonarparte addressing to recent "rUsSiAn pRoPaGaNdA🤡"
Thanks for information ❤❤❤
i disagree all the big mouth NATO nations cannot keep up with weapons productions and the best they did was a 300k in war games and half that were support units...and all their army's are in bad shape and never fought a high end war so there is no chance of NATO beating Russia on the ground game !!
The truth is, Zelensky will be changed then everything will be done. Zelensky can just resign anytime. A new leader is likely to not pursue NATO and concede territories.
He knows to much
I don’t fancy he’s chances
If you get my drift
@@Sean-p3o If he stays in ukraine post his removal, yes. But he will likely leave ukraine! America, London or Tel Aviv!
Zelenski has overstayed his constitutional term. By definition, Ukraine is now under a usurper in control of the State military.... it's a neo-nazi military junta now... and the west still props it up.
Or Putin can stop his illegal invasion which was condemned by the UN
Thanks :)
Ukraine losses are 1.5 million
That's not counting all the children,,,women and old men caught up in this meat grinder that the one world government cabal calls an invasion.... Blackrock (CIA) is just waiting to get in to Ukraine and with taxpayers money rebuild what the NATO countries r responsible for annihilating and absolutely destroying
Fact. Killed, crippled, wounded, captured, missing and deserted. Its over
West has no chance (we stick to conventional) we have lost majority of ecupment allready in the field, we have no battlefield doctrine, moast soldiers are just traind to be contra terrorist swat, and moast crucial; the populous are not motivated
This is crazy;)
people tend to overestimate us possibility to send weapons to ukraine, they need to not just double down, but essentially send third and even half of their equipment to actually make a difference, im talking about thousands tanks, hundreds airplanes etc., and they WONT do it because it will make the us itself vulnerable.
And even if they would, where they will store all these piles of equipment? how they will ship it? there is no way they could hide these enormous caravans from russian rockets, im not even talking about constant flow of parts for repairs, about engineers they would need to send with the equipment! this will never happen
It’s not about equipment it’s like it stuck in everyone’s head give them more, give them more. Wars are won with manpower not machines only. If there isn’t enough personnel to operate these weapons what good is more? All that will happen is acres of new equipment sitting in parking lots with no one to use them. That’s the facts. It seems to escape those here on the west.
BREAKING: Regime change all oever the world: Now also in South Korea.
As very accurately predicted the US empire thrashes about ever more wildly and triggers chaos and anarchy globally. This is the dying phase of a Hegemon.
URSULA WILL BUY 1000 ELEFANT FROM INDIA, JUST CALL MODI, TO TRANSFER THEM TO UKRAINIAN FRONT 🎉🎉🎉
We gave Pres.Trump a Mandate. Get the Hell out of Ukraine. Get the Hell out of Europe. Fire all trans military.
Non sono disponibili i sottotitoli
the echochamber is real
A decisive breakthrough?? Who would've expected that... After fifty days of previously decisive breakthroughs
Be happy you are not one of those soldiers fighting in a trench at minus degrees, all for some interests of a rich elite playing for world domination
I dont think this fellow understands that an "advance" is not a "breakthrough"
No mate this is the real one, I promise.
Ed, take your meds.
nice joke@@edthebumblingfool
why no subs?
Bring back the telegram comments
why are auto subtitles turned off
Why subtitles?
@@charlieboy7798 i like to watch on 2x speed
🇷🇺 💪
It is December 2029,
Russian forces finish clearing operations after a major Ukrainian insurgency in Lvov. After years of fierce fighting and stubborness, and a botched nuclear program cutting off western support, the ukrainian lines collapsed in 2027. Hundreds of thousands of tired Ukrainian soldiers without ammunition and lack of will surrendered in hordes.
The Russian war machine prevails even after massive losses.
The Ukraine's population has plummeted to 18 million, most of them live in the east and donetsk.
The Ukrainian spirit is fully broken, the capable men and women have fled west.
The remaining people are either pro russians or disheartened and tired Ukrainians.
Millions of ethnic russians find work in lucrative wages offered by the kremlin to rebuild the Ukraine.
Overtime, the Ukrainians engineered their destruction.
Now, they are numbering at a mere 8 million people, mostly middle aged and old peoples.
Now a diaspora similar to the jews, the Ukrainian flag is lowered in Lvov one last time.
Prescient
Brilliant. I don't think it'll take another 5 years to get there, but I may be wrong.
Using FAB's to take out apartment complexes is rather drastic. What you take is completely destroyed. They wont have enough bodies to occupy the area once the war is done. Where have the people gone that used to live there? Are they hostages in Ukraine? Or did they go to Russia?
There will be a boom in construction after the war.
Hey xalensky says cease fire!!!!!!
Even if western troops enter, so what, Russia may get others to enter as well and now what?
SUBTITLES??????????????????????????????????????
👍👍👍👍👍
Allah bless bro
👍
your goals are wrong and they was never the goals.
Trump does not decide . you put too much weight on him
t doesn't matter who the US president is, Kursk will never be a subject of negotiations on the Russian side. Ukrainians are mistaken if they think they will be able to use their presence in the Kursk region as an advantage. The Ukrainian Kursk offensive actually suits the Russians in the current situation because this is not a blitzkrieg war but a war of attrition. The Ukrainian Kursk Offensive is the biggest mistake they made in this war.
Does anyone watch these bloody adverts or are they simply self defeating as an annoyance
AJ's SponsorBlock is your friend.
Não tem legenda
I believe President Trump will set a level of support with Ukraine, which won't give Ukraine everything they want but enough to maintain them and will present a peace plan. If Ukraine doesn't, except that's aid will decrease if Russia doesn't, except the aid will increase.
NOTHING the US can supply will make the slightest bit of difference to Ukraine. They simply do not have the weapons available to send. Russia's tactics are such that they are bulldozing the Ukr/army into constant retreat as they take enormous causalities. Trump has NOTHING to negotiate with - except the fact that Putin would like to see an end to the conflict - BUT NOT WITHOUT ACHIEVING THE RUSSIAN OBJECTIVES.
Don't forget what weasels politicians are. If Trump can use Ukraine to hurt Russia while looking like a domestic hero and boosting the 'defense' industry, he will.
Oh, please. They will both accept the plan and wholeheartedly support it… then just keep fighting.
And nothing of that aid will be enough to make a difference...unless TrAmp has some Star Wars cloning technology
At this point do you think that any amount of US aid would be able to change anything? You would just empty your stocks and take 10-15 years to restore it
furst
2 yrs 15% of Ukraine Russian controlled
How long is it gonna take for 50% of Ukraine to be Russian controlled😭😭😭
War of Attrition also known as "War of Annihilation."
They wont controll 50% at any time.
They fight against heavy defended fortresses - thats why they are very slow.
And you can See a Change in russian military tactics over the Last 3 years.
But controlling 50%? Ukraine will capitulate after the fall of pokrowsk. Dont forget, that Trump will start His presidency in january. And His Focus is Not even Close to the Ukraine. And we germans cant fill the Gap the US leaves (I think our goverment will try it, but will fail cause of our collapsing Economy)
You assume that every piece of territory that the Russians take will have to be taken by military force. A massive chunk of territory will be taken at the negotiation table, I imagine.
If the frontline crumbles, Russia takes eastern part in several days
ellensky fan girls seriously need a better copium whine 😂😂😂😂😂
what are Russian citizens thoughts about the war, I can understand Russia as a country not wanting Nato on their door step and Ukraines treatment of ethnic Russians along the border, but are the citizens dedicated to the cause?
You can gauge their views by the facts that Russia has not had to have a second round of mobilization since the one in September 2022. For the past 18 months, it's seen a steady flow of volunteers, to the tune of 30,000 a month. Another way of assessing the Russians' views is their degree of support for Putin: steady at 78-80% (it varies a bit depending on the month the poll is taken).
@ wow.. 30k a month is massive. i’d be hesitant to volunteer knowing that if they require 30k a month that would mean there is massive casualties just churning out death. absolute shame no idea how zelensky hasn’t been strung up in the main square by his own ppl. how does he live with so much blood on his hands.
@@leonidas6682 Frontline contract pays a lot of money, so much in fact, you could easily save enough money to buy 2 living rooms apartment.
As for political views...in the last 2 years, most people changed their opinion as soon they spoken with pro-ukrainian nationalists, brainwashed masses and what they did.
For example removal of russian classic literature from european libraries, as authors from 18 centuries was directly involved in current politics.
The russians remember 1991. Many also remember ww2 as every third family had lost a beloved one
@@leonidas6682 They are not losing 30k a month or anything like it, the huge numbers simply mean that Russian front line units get relieved and rotated more often, while fresh troops gain battle experience on less active fronts. A lot of those volunteers also go into relatively safe logistic as support units
TOO MUCH THEORY AND SUPPOSITIONS..nOT HELPFUL
100 days of breakthroughs and we are still only 20kmm from the 2022 lines
Count men and tanks
Are yoy clueless or just coping?
He is both
@@edthebumblingfool day 768 of zelenskys failed spring offensive. Not a single cm gained 😂
How often do we have to repeat that russia is not fighting Ukraine, but Nato. They trained, supported, armed ukrain or do you think ukrain makes all these weapons themselves or you think ukraine does the ISR with satellites they don’t have?
Trump also said maybe loosen the sanctions on Russia to maybe sweeten the pot for a peace deal.
Trump knows history better than his predecessor. He knows what deleterious and unforeseen side effects sanctions can have during a war.
Why would Russia want the sanctions removed? Eventually but not yet. They have been such a useful tool in expanding the economy and guaranteeing which markets are reliable and loyal. Russia should demand that they continue at least for several more months, if not years. But it's getting cold in western Europe. . .
@severianmonk7394
Maybe so Russia can sell more oil and gas to other countries?
@@georgecarmel6114 It's selling plenty enough, via third parties like India.
@vaska1999
Yes, but one of the sanctions was it capped the price of oil to like $45.00 (us) for a barrel of oil. The US always goes to defund a country to cripple them.
SUBTITLES??????????????????????????????????????
SUBTITLES??????????????????????????????????????
SUBTITLES??????????????????????????????????????