Stop this PAP Wayang ! Singaporeans know very well , PAP just want to fix the Oppositions ! VTO PAP in GE2025 , A MUST ! Americans had done it ! Singaporeans also can ! 😅
She was sworn-in and took the Oath as Member of Parliament and She owe it upon herself to come clean to make the correction and tell the truth in Parliament. She should thank PS for prompting her to do so.
Pritam Singh lied or Raeesah khan lied. Why Khan wanted to harm Pritam Singh this is evil. Whatever Khan has been compromised and this court case should not have happened. Very bad publicity for Singapore Government.
The more they try to take every opportunity to tarnish the image, the more Popular they become and I predict will win more support regardless of the obvious outcome.
The question is merry go round and round. DESPERADO just want to impress the sg. GOVT. Mr. PS is impressive and straight follow answer. Applause. 👏👏👏👏👍👍👍
Referring to CNA News on the 25 Oct 2024 11:48AM; Quote; "Ms Loh says Mr Nathan suggested at this meeting that Ms Khan continue the lie. She later agrees that Singh had responded by saying: “Don't even suggest covering this up with another lie.”"
Obviously, taking every opportunity to tarnish WP image, incriminating and vilifying PS one cent not worth, but in case any of you are in doubt, just refer to the AHTC case where WP proceeded to win the Seng Kang GRC despite the willful incrimination. As we recall: "Town councils ordered to pay about S$388,800 in costs, disbursements to WP leaders and others" after the high court appeal.
I think this is a joke, the court actually go all the way to interpretation of a statement!!! Please lah, everyone will interpret a statement differently, how can the prosecutor interpret for RK when he is not her. If in doubt, RK could have clarified as this is an impt issue....but rather she choose to interpret it one way rather than the other...was it the fault of PS? I remember when i was in Pri sch, my teacher did told us spoken, written language can b misleading, even when we put the comas at different part of a statement, different meaning may result. PS at most is not been so precise, but RK should also clarify. Smells fishy why the whoke pap team and the prosecutor are there to help an opposition, liar interpret statements. That is how we waste taxpayer money on? 说者无心，听者有意识（Person who say dont have intention, but listener have guilt)
I will not judge you can also be taken to mean I will not look down on you just because you have been raped, for example it has nothing to do with wrong. "Judge not, that you be not judged" in Matthew 7:1-5. As PS said, she is an MP by her own right [People's Elected] to take ownership and responsibility of her own Lie. She should thank PS for prompting her to own up. There is no legal link to any Opposition Party Leader during her own Oath to the Parliament, so the two entities should be separate for example there is no law/legal requirement for PS to Police her to confess. But read my other comment on PS is a benevolent, magnanimous leader.
Obviously, taking every opportunity to tarnish WP image, incriminating and vilifying PS one cent not worth, but in case any of you are in doubt, just refer to the AHTC case where WP proceeded to win the Seng Kang GRC despite the willful incrimination. As we recall: "Town councils ordered to pay about S$388,800 in costs, disbursements to WP leaders and others" after the high court appeal.
Can you help answer this question; Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr. Singh used the words “take it to the grave”. But in the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr. Singh told her, in the presence of Ms. Lim and Mr. Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”. I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".? Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about? These days, Trust Cannot be Simply Granted. It's not difficult to predict that the Outcome will reinforce LHY oversea claims & complaints. I hope one day LHY and many others will safely return to Singapore. Time for Change.
Let me say a few words: 1) Lying to the COP( not once, but twice) is a serious offence & hence the court need to ascertain if this indeed is true? 2) If there is nothing to hide, why be afraid to go on trial? Let Singaporeans learn the truth. 3) If one is not guilty conscious, when there is a knock on the door at midnight, one need not be afraid....
Stop this PAP Wayang ! Singaporeans know very well , PAP just want to fix the Oppositions ! VTO PAP in GE2025 , A MUST ! Americans had done it ! Singaporeans also can ! 😅
She was sworn-in and took the Oath as Member of Parliament and She owe it upon herself to come clean to make the correction and tell the truth in Parliament. She should thank PS for prompting her to do so.
Singh is a liar!
Wasting public money.
Pritam Singh lied or Raeesah khan lied. Why Khan wanted to harm Pritam Singh this is evil. Whatever Khan has been compromised and this court case should not have happened. Very bad publicity for Singapore Government.
The more they try to take every opportunity to tarnish the image, the more Popular they become and I predict will win more support regardless of the obvious outcome.
The question is merry go round and round. DESPERADO just want to impress the sg. GOVT. Mr. PS is impressive and straight follow answer. Applause. 👏👏👏👏👍👍👍
Referring to CNA News on the 25 Oct 2024 11:48AM;
Quote;
"Ms Loh says Mr Nathan suggested at this meeting that Ms Khan continue the lie.
She later agrees that Singh had responded by saying: “Don't even suggest
covering this up with another lie.”"
😊😊😊😊 cannot get evidence, now must use force liao? Time running out😊
Obviously, taking every opportunity to tarnish WP image, incriminating and vilifying PS one cent not worth, but in case any of you are in doubt, just refer to the AHTC case where WP proceeded to win the Seng Kang GRC despite the willful incrimination. As we recall: "Town councils ordered to pay about S$388,800 in costs, disbursements to WP leaders and others" after the high court appeal.
This is how the PAP fix the opposition to party.
I don't get it. How and Where are the relevancies of all these "incriminating suggestions" to his 2 Charges?
I think this is a joke, the court actually go all the way to interpretation of a statement!!! Please lah, everyone will interpret a statement differently, how can the prosecutor interpret for RK when he is not her. If in doubt, RK could have clarified as this is an impt issue....but rather she choose to interpret it one way rather than the other...was it the fault of PS? I remember when i was in Pri sch, my teacher did told us spoken, written language can b misleading, even when we put the comas at different part of a statement, different meaning may result. PS at most is not been so precise, but RK should also clarify. Smells fishy why the whoke pap team and the prosecutor are there to help an opposition, liar interpret statements. That is how we waste taxpayer money on? 说者无心，听者有意识（Person who say dont have intention, but listener have guilt)
This is lame!!! Placing a high calibre prosecutor to argue lowly over a trivial lie. Making him look like a fool😂
That's yesterday's cross examining. I think the prosecutor still can't find the slightest evidence to prove that P S had lied.
All the prosecution witnesses lied, even during the COP, right? I rest my case.🤣
I will not judge you can also be taken to mean I will not look down on you just because you have been raped, for example it has nothing to do with wrong. "Judge not, that you be not judged" in Matthew 7:1-5.
As PS said, she is an MP by her own right [People's Elected] to take ownership and responsibility of her own Lie. She should thank PS for prompting her to own up. There is no legal link to any Opposition Party Leader during her own Oath to the Parliament, so the two entities should be separate for example there is no law/legal requirement for PS to Police her to confess. But read my other comment on PS is a benevolent, magnanimous leader.
Mr ang. If you are so great and know what to do, why not u be wp leader
Obviously, taking every opportunity to tarnish WP image, incriminating and vilifying PS one cent not worth, but in case any of you are in doubt, just refer to the AHTC case where WP proceeded to win the Seng Kang GRC despite the willful incrimination. As we recall: "Town councils ordered to pay about S$388,800 in costs, disbursements to WP leaders and others" after the high court appeal.
Can you help answer this question;
Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr. Singh used the words “take it to the grave”.
But in the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr. Singh told her, in the presence of Ms. Lim and Mr. Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”.
I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".?
Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about?
These days, Trust Cannot be Simply Granted.
It's not difficult to predict that the Outcome will reinforce LHY oversea claims & complaints.
I hope one day LHY and many others will safely return to Singapore.
Time for Change.
Why identical questioning as Edwin? lol
This may backfire on the PAP.
Grilled? … 😂
Why im never get any salary $0.for long time.can you telling true.
Put morality on both sides and interests in the middle.
Why charge , let life go on, live and let live😂
Let me say a few words:
1) Lying to the COP( not once, but twice) is a serious offence & hence the court need to ascertain if this indeed is true?
2) If there is nothing to hide, why be afraid to go on trial? Let Singaporeans learn the truth.
3) If one is not guilty conscious, when there is a knock on the door at midnight, one need not be afraid....
Judges are not impartial in Singapore.
Pants on fire
Liar support liar shame
Jail him he so wayang Yaya liar king WP shame shameful 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎