I remember there used to fog or rain (not sure), very rare though. I remember having such a battle on Jungle and you could only see like 50m in front of you, made driving around really intense.
Anything that can mount a .50 cal can mount a mk19 its the same pintle. The 40mm hedp gets like 76mm pen too I think it would be a cool addition somewhere
@@ckingc05 the mk19 should get more modern ammo than any of the helis with 40mm. None of those helis were in service when m430a1 was introduced I'm pretty sure they just gave them historically accurate ammo as opposed to actually just nerfing it.
honestly 76mm pen with HEDP is... a pretty adventurous estimate, I don't think it is realistically capable of anywhere near that. maybe 50mm, possibly.
@@hirumaryuei Armor penetration of HE rounds is velocity dependent as confirmed by Soviet penetration testing and later US testing. It's not a huge effect, but it is a significant one. The impact momentum adds to the stresses of the explosion placed on the armor. It's entirely possible for MK19 HEDP to start at 76 out of the muzzle and end at 51 by the time it gets anywhere, there's not a lot of propellant in the case.
The reason for wt sounds being broken and them getting redone so often is just because the sound leaks out every time its used so it needs to be refilled and like with ink you need to replace it all
the sound issue is also in air battles, sometimes the enemy's engine doesn't make any noise then when they're below 2km from you the noise suddenly ramp up in volume
Yeah those broken sounds have gotten me killed so much in the last few weeks, the one that had me nearly launch my keyboard into orbit was a tiger 2 just driving around making no sound at all and flanking my squad of 3 because of it. We literally had no clue it was there until i died.
I think the Tank Museum in Wyoming has one of these. I don't have a good picture atm, and I wont be back to the museum until next spring, but it's either a CCVL or XM8. Atleast it looks alot like them. Edit: Looked it up, it's the CCVL. The Wikipedia page for the XM8 has the one in Wyoming in it's pictures for it. I went to the original planned opening of the museum back during covid, and alot of the tanks weren't in their current positions yet. Tank Alley back then was just a few armoured vehicles, and when I went the CCVL was sitting next to a Matilda. The Matilda was fairly small compared to tanks like the M60, but was pretty close to the CCVL.
I'd really like some m56 fotage. It's like a light tank and plays like one as well. Also don't forget that it's max speed is 45 and it reaches it easily.
@@Skip.8221 In my experience, it really comes down to the map you're playing on. It's better on larger maps where you have the speed advantege combined with the size. It's easy to set up ambushes for the enemy. On the other hand smaller city maps are your worst nightmare.
I got killed yesterday by a Tiger 1 which made no noise at all. I could hear the tank I was shooting at a block away, but not the Tiger which was the other side of the wall I was on apparently. They really need to sort the sound.
I honestly didn't know there was a big controversy over the CCVL being 10.0 instead of 9.7/9.3 I thought it is pretty good at 10.0 but I am in no way against it going down in BR. It's currently my favorite tank in the game, I love it.
Tbh, i'm tired of downtier = fixing vehicles. If it's marketed at 10.0, just make it perform like it should be at 10.0. Give it a better round or something.
@@spideysquestionablyusedcha5069 It already got a better round which is M833, which is also the first round that the US gets that is DM33 equivalent, M833 is the sole reason that the CCVL is 10.0 and not 9.3, so if it got an even better round it would go to 10.3 because Gaijin doesn't seem to like giving the US decent rounds without raising their BRs at the same time, for example most other nations get DM33 equivalent in the 8.0-9.0 BR bracket, that said nothing about the CCVL makes it .7 higher of a BR in comparison to the XM8, so I fail to see how it is not at the same BR as the PT-16/T14.
@@aflyingcowboy31 I meant give it a better round than it already has. If DM33 is a 9 round, why not just give the CCVL a 10.0 equiv so it can more easily pen russians?
@@spideysquestionablyusedcha5069 As I already stated M833 is the best round the US gets from 8.0 - 10.0 and it is only DM33 equivalent and the CCVL is the only vehicle that has it bar the 10.7 IPM1, like I said Gaijin hates giving the US good rounds, so if it gets a better round, it will also go up in BR, besides, the only other round I believe it can get is M900, so it would probably go up to 10.7, hence why people complain about it at 10.0.
1:00 I use CITVs only when the gunner optics are either: Too zoomed in, and the commander optics have a better FOV. I use it for target acquisition, then switch to the gunner optics to fire. And/or if the gunner optics have worse thermals than the CITV (such as on the leo 2a5 and 6). And again, use the commander optics for target acquisition and then switch to gunner optics. CITVs aren't really all that useful, but it really depends on the tank, sometimes the CITV can be much better than the gunner optics, and sometimes (such as on the PUMA) they can actually be worse. Just kinda nice to have tho.
It’s been a year now but I’m still mad that both the CCVL and XM8 are still just event vehicles. I think the XM8 should be a tech tree vehicle especially if the HSTV-L is and that was even more of a prototype tank. I really don’t understand why gaijin gives the US this kind of treatment.
"I literally never use them" thermals 4 clips later I want to climb the American tree but japan is calling my name next. I main Germany though so I didn't know about puma sound issues but I run into it all the time against Russia in top tier.
I personally love vehicles with CITV idk if it’s because grinding through Russia with not only a lack of CITV but also thermals but I love it on every vehicle that gets it. So the ccvl getting it when I don’t think a single MBT at 10.0 does is a great feature.
The new smoke in war thunder is.... just outright bad.... you can easily look through it from the outside, but you cant see anything inside it.... xd great update
Could you do a video about the swedish/norwegian premium leopard 1, it means alot to me because im norwegian. fun fact the tekst that is on the mantlet of the tank is actually the word for "mean". Lovely vid spookston keep it up:)
about those sound issues. at gaijin hq "naa man we cant fix the servers or fix the sounds or rework the maps or rebalance the brs. we too busy pumping out modern shit that most of the players never get to touch and right now we need to plan either a new copypasta techtree or start pumping out finnish premium tanks"
could you try playing the AMX-50 Foch? i've had some extreme inconsistencies with its gun, despite it supposedly being one of the most powerful full-bore kinetic weapons in the game; a jagdpanther bounced the AP shell at under 400 meters.
That 120mm gun (also featured on the M103, AMX-50 120) should basically have performance more in common with second gen APDS just due to the sheer excessive energy in the shell. All american derived AP ammo after WW2 benefited from the research and metallurgy improvements that the T50E1 90mm ammo provided, but the devs of this game don't want to model 'steel quality in ammo' or armor. Haven't seen anyone properly model the difference between old ammo with shitty steel and new ammo with good steel in the various youtube channels that show off ANSYS/whatever simulations, either. Basically russian devs don't want to model something that will make their ammo look worse.
I getting trolled by teammates a lot when I was in one of those little things, you will have someone pushed you 1km from the spawn point or getting fishtail intentionally because they think it is funny.
Attack drones cost a lot for only two kills but the best nerf they can get is a different spawn and starting at 10.0. They come too early to be countered and spawn to high to be killed by anything but SAM's.
With the ever expanding rooster of tanks I wonder if Gaijin would dare to add any tank from the "Terminator" series. Because even with the earliest version (around 2000) which was with single 30mm auto and 4 atgms it would be way powerful against everything, especially in city CQC.
I think the only Terminators were lost in Ukraine frontally, the competing project lost out only for political reasons... It's not very good in reality as the crew can't really see out nor effectively serve the guns. Ofc reality has never gotten in Gaijin's way for making OP Russian tanks
@@cheyannei5983 Yeah they put them in combat once but it was not in the city where they have been designed to fight but out in open. But for propaganda purposes they look cool.
@@Nikolay_Slavov Pretty sure they were lost on the way to the city. Object 781, 782, and 787 were all better vehicles than the 'Terminator' that resulted.
I once killed a Pz4 with a KV2 at my spawn to his spawn. IDK how I even seen him. it was right at spawn. Something like 5KM shot. With a concrete buster round no less.
You should give the long 75 panzer 4s a go. I find the gameplay compared to higher tanks so much more relaxing. Not having to worry about atgms or being shot from 1.5km away.
sounds yeah....glad to know i am not alone in this...everytime i mentioned this, the whole chat goes: COPE / SKILL ISSUE.. etc.. Drone revenge / CAS revenge is in all BRs ( if some of you still wonder why so few re-spawns, well thats the reason, maybe for premium account you can take a 2nd tank, for a non prem account, you will end up with an empty SL bankaccount very soon )..
I actually kind of like the way the CCVL looks. Those smoothed bevels on the hull/turret and back-to-front slope are attractive to me. Granted, it and the XM8 are tall but not very wide which still makes them look a bit goofy.
Pretty funny looking at this video a year later, in this the T-72 gets ammorack almost every time the carosel gets hit, compared to current day where they can take anywhere between 1-5 hits to blow up xD
Kinda dumb how getting kill streaks no longer gives you extra rewards as much as it used to. It exposes just how pushy Gajin is at getting players to buy premium
I love my big dorky CCVL. win ratio of 66% that with my M1 Abrams. beautiful pairing. the CCVL slaps. with fast turret speeds. 5 second reload. u can really own the map if you play aggressive
It's like someone in the design room saw a new blueprint and then proceeded to ''content aware scale'' the f*ck out of it before handing it off to the production
Once upon a time, everyone asked for night battles.
Everyone then realized “man, night battles fucking suck”
And everyone died (they didn’t have NVD)
when gaijin intentionally matches you into night battles when you dont have NVD but as soon as you purchase NVD you stop getting night battles
@@danko8983 yea xD I literally always have that, even more so when I have only 1 vehicle with NVD's in my lineup
When the game just gets too real for a moment.
@@danko8983 when i started grinding parts for the ags
i got like 9 nightbattles in a row and i didnt have any thermals or nvd
man it was such a pain
I remember there used to fog or rain (not sure), very rare though. I remember having such a battle on Jungle and you could only see like 50m in front of you, made driving around really intense.
Sound design in WT is just ridiculous. So many years of development, so many updates and "fixes" and its still so broken.
I hope its fixed in 10 more years
Yet they won’t let us have our own sound cause “unfair advantages”
It doesnt bother me as i listen to podcasts while playing :D modern problems require modern solutions
I don't even play with sound. my game audio is set to zero
gotta point out how ugly swedish tank crew voices are
"Oh their spawn is right there"
The story of Stalingrad (battle mode)
Who in ther right mind thought such placement of spawn would be a good idea!?
It's European Province (big) all over again...
@@zzzzUS
> right mind
> Gaijin
Found your problem
That's just the story of Stalingrad IRL. 😂
gotta love the map designers at gaijin. i want some of what they are smoking
@@DoommasterAM that's just the story of dense urban battles
I love these gameplay vids. You’re too entertaining to limit yourself to only informative videos
Agreed
You spoke facts
Why is spookston so peggable? (No homo)
@@blugastidiofable9517 ayo?
I understand what you mean bro but AYO?
@@aegypter1n I am an extremely normal person
Gaijin: "Sound issues? More like skill issues"
Anything that can mount a .50 cal can mount a mk19 its the same pintle. The 40mm hedp gets like 76mm pen too I think it would be a cool addition somewhere
"Mop any troublemakers with the mk19"
It got nerfed it’s 51mm now.
@@ckingc05 the mk19 should get more modern ammo than any of the helis with 40mm. None of those helis were in service when m430a1 was introduced I'm pretty sure they just gave them historically accurate ammo as opposed to actually just nerfing it.
honestly 76mm pen with HEDP is... a pretty adventurous estimate, I don't think it is realistically capable of anywhere near that. maybe 50mm, possibly.
@@hirumaryuei Armor penetration of HE rounds is velocity dependent as confirmed by Soviet penetration testing and later US testing.
It's not a huge effect, but it is a significant one. The impact momentum adds to the stresses of the explosion placed on the armor. It's entirely possible for MK19 HEDP to start at 76 out of the muzzle and end at 51 by the time it gets anywhere, there's not a lot of propellant in the case.
Funny how the earlier design gets the better apfsds ammo
Over 50% of my deaths can be attributed to being rushed by vehicles with no engine noise. Most often it’s wheeled vics.
The reason for wt sounds being broken and them getting redone so often is just because the sound leaks out every time its used so it needs to be refilled and like with ink you need to replace it all
the sound issue is also in air battles, sometimes the enemy's engine doesn't make any noise then when they're below 2km from you the noise suddenly ramp up in volume
3:44 that's what every tank with Z or V on them deserves:
"The sounds are so broken...."
Don't worry, they're apparently going to be fucking with... I mean changing them again in the coming patch.
Yeah those broken sounds have gotten me killed so much in the last few weeks, the one that had me nearly launch my keyboard into orbit was a tiger 2 just driving around making no sound at all and flanking my squad of 3 because of it. We literally had no clue it was there until i died.
The new smoke feels like everybody can see you but you see nothing
I think the Tank Museum in Wyoming has one of these. I don't have a good picture atm, and I wont be back to the museum until next spring, but it's either a CCVL or XM8. Atleast it looks alot like them.
Edit: Looked it up, it's the CCVL. The Wikipedia page for the XM8 has the one in Wyoming in it's pictures for it. I went to the original planned opening of the museum back during covid, and alot of the tanks weren't in their current positions yet. Tank Alley back then was just a few armoured vehicles, and when I went the CCVL was sitting next to a Matilda. The Matilda was fairly small compared to tanks like the M60, but was pretty close to the CCVL.
4:22 love the no spalling on the T-80s currently
no russian bias they said
yeh the sound issues are a bit issue, including the times where you can hear a tank coming from your left even tho the tank was coming from the right
I'd like to see you try the VFM5 and compare it to the XM8
I'd really like some m56 fotage. It's like a light tank and plays like one as well. Also don't forget that it's max speed is 45 and it reaches it easily.
Well it's a Paradrop Light Tank, can spot as well.
It just the limited Arch making it a Tank Destroyer/SPG thing 🤣
I've never been able to do good in it. Ideally it's good for flanking but I always get MG'd as soon as I get into a spot
@@Skip.8221 In my experience, it really comes down to the map you're playing on. It's better on larger maps where you have the speed advantege combined with the size. It's easy to set up ambushes for the enemy. On the other hand smaller city maps are your worst nightmare.
Me, a so called free-thinker when I see Spookston uploaded 30 miuntes ago, instantly clicking the video.
3:46
TURMS? ✅
Z Decal? ✅
Legally fucking blind? ✅
Chromie homie spotted
I got killed yesterday by a Tiger 1 which made no noise at all. I could hear the tank I was shooting at a block away, but not the Tiger which was the other side of the wall I was on apparently. They really need to sort the sound.
Damnit spookston you're gonna make me act up and play USA.
so its not just me dealing with soundless engines
11 months later and the sound issues still aren't fixed.
I honestly didn't know there was a big controversy over the CCVL being 10.0 instead of 9.7/9.3
I thought it is pretty good at 10.0 but I am in no way against it going down in BR. It's currently my favorite tank in the game, I love it.
Tbh, i'm tired of downtier = fixing vehicles. If it's marketed at 10.0, just make it perform like it should be at 10.0. Give it a better round or something.
@@spideysquestionablyusedcha5069 It already got a better round which is M833, which is also the first round that the US gets that is DM33 equivalent, M833 is the sole reason that the CCVL is 10.0 and not 9.3, so if it got an even better round it would go to 10.3 because Gaijin doesn't seem to like giving the US decent rounds without raising their BRs at the same time, for example most other nations get DM33 equivalent in the 8.0-9.0 BR bracket, that said nothing about the CCVL makes it .7 higher of a BR in comparison to the XM8, so I fail to see how it is not at the same BR as the PT-16/T14.
@@aflyingcowboy31 I meant give it a better round than it already has. If DM33 is a 9 round, why not just give the CCVL a 10.0 equiv so it can more easily pen russians?
@@spideysquestionablyusedcha5069 As I already stated M833 is the best round the US gets from 8.0 - 10.0 and it is only DM33 equivalent and the CCVL is the only vehicle that has it bar the 10.7 IPM1, like I said Gaijin hates giving the US good rounds, so if it gets a better round, it will also go up in BR, besides, the only other round I believe it can get is M900, so it would probably go up to 10.7, hence why people complain about it at 10.0.
It is still more beautiful than any Swedish vehicle.
You’ve lost your mind
True, CV90s are nasty as fuck
The sounds aren't broken, THE WHOLE GAME IS BROKEN!!!!!
aw man the sound issue has been my bane for ages i get duked and flanked alot thanks to it
*Strv 74: "Am I a joke to you?"*
1:28 u can see the missile flying towards spook lmao
i love how gaijin cannot solve the engine not making any noise, it's been like 3 or 4 months
I saw this tank in person. It's at the national military vehicle museum in duibois Wyoming.
1:00 I use CITVs only when the gunner optics are either:
Too zoomed in, and the commander optics have a better FOV. I use it for target acquisition, then switch to the gunner optics to fire.
And/or if the gunner optics have worse thermals than the CITV (such as on the leo 2a5 and 6). And again, use the commander optics for target acquisition and then switch to gunner optics.
CITVs aren't really all that useful, but it really depends on the tank, sometimes the CITV can be much better than the gunner optics, and sometimes (such as on the PUMA) they can actually be worse. Just kinda nice to have tho.
hey look! *it's the Diet Sheridan!*
It’s been a year now but I’m still mad that both the CCVL and XM8 are still just event vehicles. I think the XM8 should be a tech tree vehicle especially if the HSTV-L is and that was even more of a prototype tank. I really don’t understand why gaijin gives the US this kind of treatment.
"I literally never use them"
thermals 4 clips later
I want to climb the American tree but japan is calling my name next. I main Germany though so I didn't know about puma sound issues but I run into it all the time against Russia in top tier.
I like CITVs for their application as thermal binoculars but they aren’t as game-changing as TVDs are in the first place
I personally love vehicles with CITV idk if it’s because grinding through Russia with not only a lack of CITV but also thermals but I love it on every vehicle that gets it. So the ccvl getting it when I don’t think a single MBT at 10.0 does is a great feature.
Okay, so I'm not the only one having issues where the enemy engines are now silent running.
They're preparing the game for when they implement submarines!
The new smoke in war thunder is.... just outright bad.... you can easily look through it from the outside, but you cant see anything inside it.... xd great update
"The same oversteering problem as the XM8"
How does a tank _oversteer?!_
Could you do a video about the swedish/norwegian premium leopard 1, it means alot to me because im norwegian. fun fact the tekst that is on the mantlet of the tank is actually the word for "mean". Lovely vid spookston keep it up:)
3:44. dudes got commitment to the RP
CITV used to be useful when it gave thermals to your binoculars, now not so much
Go to options>sound tab>Other's player's engine volume and crank that to the limit (and crank yours to 27%)
I think he knows that after playing warthunder for over 7 years.
6:14 you can't hear the engines in the hangar if you turned off "Hangar sound effects" in your sound options
people reminice about how good CITV used to be before actual commander sights were added in new power... 2 years ago
i love the way spooks talks, feels like a dry humor about any subject, i imagine he talking about other things lmao
The M56 Scorpion. Driving it is like driving an old caddy. Smooooooth
about those sound issues. at gaijin hq "naa man we cant fix the servers or fix the sounds or rework the maps or rebalance the brs. we too busy pumping out modern shit that most of the players never get to touch and right now we need to plan either a new copypasta techtree or start pumping out finnish premium tanks"
Guess I'm the odd man out running the extra armor on the XM8. Has been useful on multiple occasions.
CITVs in War Thunder are just like incendiary bombs and flamethrowers, not useless but not useful.
spook giving me nostalgia with this C&C generals USA music
I need to remind you that the type 60 sprg holds that title
could you try playing the AMX-50 Foch? i've had some extreme inconsistencies with its gun, despite it supposedly being one of the most powerful full-bore kinetic weapons in the game; a jagdpanther bounced the AP shell at under 400 meters.
Yeah full bore rounds (specially big caliber ones) don't like volumetric and angles in this game
@@petrkdn8224 i am aware that it doesnt have a blunt-nose cap, but it is still rather ridiculous that it cant pen a panther hull
That 120mm gun (also featured on the M103, AMX-50 120) should basically have performance more in common with second gen APDS just due to the sheer excessive energy in the shell. All american derived AP ammo after WW2 benefited from the research and metallurgy improvements that the T50E1 90mm ammo provided, but the devs of this game don't want to model 'steel quality in ammo' or armor. Haven't seen anyone properly model the difference between old ammo with shitty steel and new ammo with good steel in the various youtube channels that show off ANSYS/whatever simulations, either.
Basically russian devs don't want to model something that will make their ammo look worse.
XM-8 should be in the tech tree.
The CCVL looks kinda like the Str 74
Ugly
- Amx-13 M 24
Did you just forgot me ?
They should have put XM8 on the tech tree after Bradley instead of making it an event vehicle
i would love to see some leclerc action, is seems to be missing from youtube, the only videos date back to when it was added
You can mount a MK-19 on just about anything you can mount a 50 cal to
Spook accidentally turning other players engine volume to zero
As funny as that would be, probably not the case, the sounds in ground battles are messed up.
@@Eman-720 I mean Ive played enough Apex Legends to know a thing or two about audio glitches 🤣
Requesting you play the AML-90 or Eland. It's speed lets you do silly things.
I getting trolled by teammates a lot when I was in one of those little things, you will have someone pushed you 1km from the spawn point or getting fishtail intentionally because they think it is funny.
They gotta nerf the attack drones. The scout drones are growing on me though
Attack drones cost a lot for only two kills but the best nerf they can get is a different spawn and starting at 10.0. They come too early to be countered and spawn to high to be killed by anything but SAM's.
With the ever expanding rooster of tanks I wonder if Gaijin would dare to add any tank from the "Terminator" series.
Because even with the earliest version (around 2000) which was with single 30mm auto and 4 atgms it would be way powerful against everything, especially in city CQC.
I think the only Terminators were lost in Ukraine frontally, the competing project lost out only for political reasons... It's not very good in reality as the crew can't really see out nor effectively serve the guns.
Ofc reality has never gotten in Gaijin's way for making OP Russian tanks
@@cheyannei5983 Yeah they put them in combat once but it was not in the city where they have been designed to fight but out in open.
But for propaganda purposes they look cool.
@@Nikolay_Slavov Pretty sure they were lost on the way to the city. Object 781, 782, and 787 were all better vehicles than the 'Terminator' that resulted.
I'd like to see you play the Black Night. Idk if I've ever seen you play British top tier.
Kinda looks like a modern Stewart with the rear and boxy chassis. It's unique at least
Having CITV was good untill Gaijin ruined it, commander sight should always follow your view and not just facing forward.
I once killed a Pz4 with a KV2 at my spawn to his spawn. IDK how I even seen him. it was right at spawn. Something like 5KM shot. With a concrete buster round no less.
Spookston what do you think about the army's new Lynx OMFV I read an article that apparently there trying to replace the Bradley with it.
You should give the long 75 panzer 4s a go. I find the gameplay compared to higher tanks so much more relaxing. Not having to worry about atgms or being shot from 1.5km away.
still don’t understand why the predecessor to the XM8 uses a better round than the XM8…
I like how the prototype is higher in BR than the actual one. Good job Gaijin
The HSTV-L is the ugliest tank I have ever seen even compared to the bob semple tank
Despite its appearance, it is still an adorable chonky boi
sounds yeah....glad to know i am not alone in this...everytime i mentioned this, the whole chat goes: COPE / SKILL ISSUE.. etc.. Drone revenge / CAS revenge is in all BRs ( if some of you still wonder why so few re-spawns, well thats the reason, maybe for premium account you can take a 2nd tank, for a non prem account, you will end up with an empty SL bankaccount very soon )..
3:43 Seeing a Russian Z tank get blown up never gets old... Just like Russian conscripts
I actually kind of like the way the CCVL looks. Those smoothed bevels on the hull/turret and back-to-front slope are attractive to me. Granted, it and the XM8 are tall but not very wide which still makes them look a bit goofy.
Pretty funny looking at this video a year later, in this the T-72 gets ammorack almost every time the carosel gets hit, compared to current day where they can take anywhere between 1-5 hits to blow up xD
ITS NOT UGLY....
HE'S JUST SPECIAL
Ugly? Have you seen the Strv 74? Ahaha
Roblox cursed tank simulator: are you challenging me
Kinda dumb how getting kill streaks no longer gives you extra rewards as much as it used to. It exposes just how pushy Gajin is at getting players to buy premium
I like the music from C&C Generals.
From what i've witnessed CITV is only useful on Leo 2's where commander has 2nd gen with gunner having 1st gen thermals
it is also pretty useful in the M3A3 when you're behind a hill and your main sight is aiming at the ground
Hey man, he’s trying his best
I love my big dorky CCVL. win ratio of 66% that with my M1 Abrams. beautiful pairing. the CCVL slaps. with fast turret speeds. 5 second reload. u can really own the map if you play aggressive
The puma 2.7 and sig (15cm nuke launcher) are fun german tanks for trolling tanks at mid tier
I Like it. Nothing different in design than the XM-8 or it ancestor Vickers Mk. something tank.
It's not about the looks, it's about how well it kills in my book.
American military vehicle museum in Wyoming has ccvl/xm8 chassis.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought it was ugly, and that citvs are usless other than having a better fov for finding targets sometimes
Hey. That thing is a part of my dream team of light tanks aight. Leave em alone.
Those drone skills on Novo 👍
Next tank: XM-1 Crhysler
"We're doing pretty decent so far" (Is top on the leader board.)
It's like someone in the design room saw a new blueprint and then proceeded to ''content aware scale'' the f*ck out of it before handing it off to the production
I love these gameolay and opinion videos and I'm curious what graphics settings you play on
Imagine being born with a massive head. Couldn't be me.
...wait do eyes count as heads