I guess Im randomly asking but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..? I was stupid lost the account password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me
@Marcellus Noel thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site on google and im trying it out atm. Takes a while so I will reply here later with my results.
I like alot great tests,, Darren from Goldfinders Australia. P.S Our TDI goes toe to toe with our gp3000 with the 15 inch semi ellip equip. But not as deep as the gp3000 with its 18inch dd. But for wet sand digging they get hard to recover at these 20+ inches deep. Thankyou very much for sharing this video, i have been curious about that new garret, and now i know
Yeah done that, same with the 6 inch mono coil from the minelab on the tdi, the minelab works better, but the tdi works better running its standard coil over the 3000 using its standard 12 inch coil
That is a great, fair test of the deepest machines out. I would have to say though that full Gain on the Dual is probably not it's best performing setting. Also, on the Shark, pulse width determines the size of ltarget it hits--not the power. Thanks!
Dc, I noticed on the Surfmaster you said was a little unstable. They you turned up the gain. With that machine you are supposed to turn down the gain to stabilize the Threshhold. Allowing you to hear deeper targets. You might this. Put the TDI seems awesome. I would love the equinox added to this group!
I wanted to build a geotech baracuda for my science project since i love diy electronic projects, will it work good on dry land (i know its intended for the use on beaches but was curious.) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Infinium should have been locked after balanced, especially on a beach. In harsh conditions it may be preferable to hunt in tacking, but it should be switched into lock as soon as a potential target appears because the more you swing over the target the more it balances it out. Just ramblings of a long time infinium user! Great video! confirmed what i suspected.
I have a Garrett Sea Hunter II, and over all its great - on the Beach and in the water. With my intent to renew my scuba certification, I will use it underwater. The Garrett is a turn on and go unit. The ATX is crippled by detector shaft vs. Sand damage issues and while I love it, I don't think I would buy it for that design flaw - maybe. I hope and pray the TDI Pro is on the schedule of detectors Garrett will make since they bought White's patents, rights etc - the TDI is a liability near the water especially in the rough sea waves such as in the winter months here in Florida, but up on dry sand it's a great, deep second round to a CTX 3030/ Equinox 800 - they can discriminate but not perfectly but they do have displays to analyze targets.
Thank you for sharing your experience. Do you know how the Whites TDI stacks up against the Minelab detectors like the SD2000/SD2200 or GPX up to 3000 model as I can pick these up second hand for around the same money as the Whites?
F0X4 I have only tested the GPX 5000 side by side with the TDI Pro at the Beach. The depth was very comparable and the TDI Pro was a little more stable at full gain.
I'm wondering if you have tried the regular TDI on the wet sand and if so how does it compare to the TDi Pro? If you have not tried it, what is your opinion of how you think they would compare as far as depth and stability? Thanks
I just can tell you that the TDI Sl is very much stable on the beach . So you hear the faintest modification of the threshold and can go very deep taking this into consideration . The TDI PRO is much more unstable and therefore you will loose some deep targets targets ...
Thanks much. Great video! How do you think the SPP would compare in this test with the big mono coil? I ask because I think I could make the SPP waterproof pretty easily since it is small. Thanks again!
Thank you for this test! Much appreciated. At what depth does the CTX3030 detects the nickel? (with no disc, no ground balance and sens at 28?) I would love to see more testing videos
Booleys The CTX will go 10-12" on a nickel in wet salt water sand depending on the settings. If you could run your detector in manual 28 sensitivity and its stable, you should hear the nickel in that 10-12" range.
I live in Australia and own a Garrett Infinium. I like the machine but it is very hard to ground balance in mineralised soil. I get great depth out of the machine but from all the videos I have seen the TDI pro looks like a step up in performance for a similar price machine. Would you recommended upgrading?
F0X4 You will find the TDI Pro will go deeper that the Infinium. I also find the TDI Pro to be very stable even at high gain. I have used the TDI Pro in the heavily mineralized dirt of Culpeper Va and it worked very well.
Thanks for posting this excellent video. I look forward to you testing the ATX with a mono coil under the same conditions. I'd speculate that you'd get the 18" nickel with a mono coil. Would it have the stability of the TDI with it's mono coil, under the conditions as in this video.
I would agree that the ATX should get about the same depth as a TDI Pro if using a mono coil. I also look forward to seeing the depth and stability results. Thanks for watching.
If you use it at the beach, it will be noisy especially if you raise and lower your coil. Keep it level and sweep slowly. Remember a PI detector is constantly retuning itself. I run at full power with the GEB off and the pulse rate about 12.
First thanks for producing this video must have been lots of work but is a great comparison of some deep seeking beach machines. One question about the settings on the Infinium. According the user manual and the posting I have read online you get the best depth using it when you have the ground balance set to Lock and you had it on slow which is known to reduce depth. Was the machine unstable unless you turned on the slow ground tracking?
+Stephen Pearsall I tried the Infinium on all settings and achieved the best signal response when set to slow; The Infinium was stable at all settings. Thanks
+DetectorComparisons Thanks for the answer - I have one its way to me and have been reading the manual and watching Garrett's and other's videos on the machine so was very interested to hear about your results. According the documentation you should only need to run on slow in very heavy mineralized areas. I intend to use it on beaches in northern Mass, NH, and southern Maine many of which have a lot of black sand mixed in the beach sand.
+Stephen Pearsall I hunt the CT and NY shores and some of the beaches are very rocky with black sand. You may also have your best results running in slow depending your levels of minerals/black sand. Good luck hunting up there!
What were the settings on ur TDI? Pulse @10, geb off, what about gain? Set on low for conductors? Don't know much about the Pro but like it's depth. I thought the coil was dual field, am I mistaken? Got alot of learning on this machine. Thanks
+Bosman Boss There is no comparison when it comes to raw depth. What sounds good on a PI is hardly noticeable on a BBS detector. I have tested a CTX with the 17" coil and could not hear signals that I heard clearly with the TDI Pro with a 12" coil. But as you know, there is a trade off, if you want the depth of a PI, you will have to dig the iron that your Sovereign ignores. The Sovereign is a slow processing detector so if there is a lot of iron around, it is probably masking good targets. I use an Excalibur which is essentially a waterproof Sovereign and I have had good results with the 15" NEL coil going very deep but I could not use it in an iron infested area.
Thank you for all your videos I'd like your opinion whether the Infinium LS or the Equinox 800 would be better for northern BC prospecting gold thank you
+zipngo1 The Sand Shark is a good basic PI unit. I use the TDI Pro or ATX because of the extreme depth but depending where you are, the Sand Shark will work just fine.
Thanks for the kind words. When deciding on the one PI machine, it all depends on what type of hunting you do. When I want to work a salt water swimming area while wading (going in and out of the salt water), I use the ATX. If I’m just working the wet salt water sand, I use the TDI Pro. If I’m looking for micro gold jewelry in wet salt water sand or gold nuggets in the field, I use the ATX. Both the TDI Pro and ATX have incredible depth but you have to look at all features and decide what is important to you.
For daily hunting on the beach I prefer my white TDI because it is lightweight . For micro jewelry I use my Garret atx ,for very deep hunting when the beach has been hunted to death I love to use my Garrett atx with the big 20 inch monocoil . So i always find some good big yellow ...
Complimenti,bel video e bel test, Fino ad ora non ho ancora avuto il piacere di testare una di queste macchine ad impulso,secondo mè per spazzolare in battigia dove batte l'onda,sarebbero l'ideale,Grazie per la condivisione,Ciao Endriu.!
keithbenefit I saw your posting.You want deep on land and under water.Check out the Fisher CZ-21 metal detector.They have videos here on youtube.You can go 200 feet under water.I haven't seen a detector than can go deeper for targets.
No need to.... there is no comparison in terms of depth. At 10" the nickel will start to disappear in the best conditions. I use the Equinox while wading.
@@DetectorComparisons thank you for your replay, i have another question I'm looking to buy another machine for parks and beach and need to be deeper, with all your metal detecting experience wich would you recommend the Equinox 800 or CTX 3030 no matter the price, Also i already have the Tdi pro, Xp deus Tdi beach hunter, Thanks in advance. xp Deus, Thanks.
@@diggingforgold4150 I personally use the Equinox 800 and XP Deus. Those are my favorite two land machines. A lot is personal preference so its hard to say what would be best for you.
The TDI SL is not nearly as sensitive as the TDI pro. The TDI pro is a deeper machine. I have used them both extensively come with the GB off I go about 4" deeper on a nickel.
Have you done this test with your TDI SL yet. General opinion is that the TDI SL has slightly less depth, but I have not seen a realistic test like this. Anecdotal evidence does not really help. Thanks
There is a big difference between the TDI S/L and the TDI Pro. The S/L is more in line with the Duel Field when it comes to depth. The TDI Pro is much deeper. I have done side by side tests with both machines and I can hear a mans gold ring at 18" with the TDI Pro and with the TDI S/L, I can hear the same ring 12"-13".
That is true . The TDI PRO is more powerful on a neutral ground . But the TDI SL is stable like a rock . So on heavy mineralised beaches I can crank up the gain to it's maximum without any problem , whereas it is not possible to go more than 50%of the gain on a TDI PRO without stability issues . .So I am more comfortable and effective with my TDI SL in a daily highly mineralised hunting situation . Even my Garret atx does not handle these harsh conditions as well as my TDI SL. I hope this helps .
I love my garret ATX . It is more sensible than my TDI SL on very small targets Ndecko on very deep ones . Nevertheless the TDI SL is very much light weight and very fast . I love both of them for what they are good at .
....you should not search with the Infinium in the slow or fast mode. Those settings are for ground balancing only. Always detect in the locked mode.....
If you are in an area where there is black sand or heavy minerals, searching in locked means you will have to reground balance the detector as ground conditions change. Garrett recommends searching in locked when you can, but if you are in an area with high minerals or black sand, searching in slow or fast is recommended by Garrett.
Not a great test....pi's like to have no air gap between the coil and sand.Also,the infinium should do better than that.......my seahunter with the 14" coil would pick up the targets better than the infinium in that test and it shouldn't.
![ลักพาตัว เอาลูกเอิร์นกลับมา...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f4NVKlZ5qkk/mqdefault.jpg)
Great comparison. Thanks for taking the time to make this video!
Thanks so much for your field test was debating between ATX and TDI Pro and I'm going to go with the TDI Pro.
Thanks for sharing this with us...Thanks for taking the time to do it...Great video!
Very well done video ! This is how a comparision video test must be done .
Very nice comparison and silhouette.
Thanks for sharing that test with us.
Thank you for doing this comparison and video! You helped me make a decision on my next detector.
Remember the PI detectors are designed for depth but you will be digging all metal including iron. Good luck.
Excellent test thanks for taking the time to put this together using the models you did those were great
I guess Im randomly asking but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an Instagram account..?
I was stupid lost the account password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me
@Emerson Wilson Instablaster :)
@Marcellus Noel thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site on google and im trying it out atm.
Takes a while so I will reply here later with my results.
@Marcellus Noel It did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thanks so much, you saved my account !
@Emerson Wilson glad I could help :D
I like alot great tests,, Darren from Goldfinders Australia. P.S Our TDI goes toe to toe with our gp3000 with the 15 inch semi ellip equip. But not as deep as the gp3000 with its 18inch dd. But for wet sand digging they get hard to recover at these 20+ inches deep. Thankyou very much for sharing this video, i have been curious about that new garret, and now i know
Yeah done that, same with the 6 inch mono coil from the minelab on the tdi, the minelab works better, but the tdi works better running its standard coil over the 3000 using its standard 12 inch coil
sorry I had the video mixed up with another you answered my question nicely in the demo thanks
That is a great, fair test of the deepest machines out. I would have to say though that full Gain on the Dual is probably not it's best performing setting. Also, on the Shark, pulse width determines the size of ltarget it hits--not the power. Thanks!
How would the sl fair in that test ? How much depth lost vs pro?
Very informative compare of PI's, Thanks for sharing...
Like the shadow pic...
Have you had a chance to test the ATX mono coil yet? Would be interesting to compare it with the TDI Pro.
Dc, I noticed on the Surfmaster you said was a little unstable. They you turned up the gain. With that machine you are supposed to turn down the gain to stabilize the Threshhold. Allowing you to hear deeper targets. You might this. Put the TDI seems awesome. I would love the equinox added to this group!
Good morning,
is Garrett ATX better than tarsacci on black sand beaches?
THANKS..
I wanted to build a geotech baracuda for my science project since i love diy electronic projects, will it work good on dry land (i know its intended for the use on beaches but was curious.) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Infinium should have been locked after balanced, especially on a beach. In harsh conditions it may be preferable to hunt in tacking, but it should be switched into lock as soon as a potential target appears because the more you swing over the target the more it balances it out. Just ramblings of a long time infinium user! Great video! confirmed what i suspected.
Josh Kiely. From one infinium owner to another, I agree completely!! This test was not done fairly!
Hi , I use the Infinium L & S, with the threshold at 6, 7, with headphone volume reduction, I noticed that I catch deeper targets
I'm using my $44.00 Barska Winbest Pro I bought at Menards, I found a penny around 10 inches deep in wet sand near the water about six feet!
Yes, thank you. I need a PI detector since I live in a beach community and will mostly be detecting at the beach. I'm also a diver/snorkeler.
I have a Garrett Sea Hunter II, and over all its great - on the Beach and in the water. With my intent to renew my scuba certification, I will use it underwater. The Garrett is a turn on and go unit. The ATX is crippled by detector shaft vs. Sand damage issues and while I love it, I don't think I would buy it for that design flaw - maybe. I hope and pray the TDI Pro is on the schedule of detectors Garrett will make since they bought White's patents, rights etc - the TDI is a liability near the water especially in the rough sea waves such as in the winter months here in Florida, but up on dry sand it's a great, deep second round to a CTX 3030/ Equinox 800 - they can discriminate but not perfectly but they do have displays to analyze targets.
Great review :)
Have you done one with the whites beach hunter yet against the pro
I just got the ATX cant wait to hit the coast. Love your videos Sub'd
GREAT VIDEO
Nice job, thanks.
great video.
I was hoping you test the big 20 inch coil on ATX some day but still holding to my hope
Good comparison video.
very useful vid thanks
What is deeper with discriminacion on
tdi pro or atx
Thanks for using the nickels, that is the true test besides maybe a ring....Good Luck
i love the vid bought a tdi pro my self
Thank you for sharing your experience. Do you know how the Whites TDI stacks up against the Minelab detectors like the SD2000/SD2200 or GPX up to 3000 model as I can pick these up second hand for around the same money as the Whites?
F0X4 I have only tested the GPX 5000 side by side with the TDI Pro at the Beach. The depth was very comparable and the TDI Pro was a little more stable at full gain.
I'm wondering if you have tried the regular TDI on the wet sand and if so how does it compare to the TDi Pro? If you have not tried it, what is your opinion of how you think they would compare as far as depth and stability? Thanks
I just can tell you that the TDI Sl is very much stable on the beach . So you hear the faintest modification of the threshold and can go very deep taking this into consideration . The TDI PRO is much more unstable and therefore you will loose some deep targets targets ...
Thanks much. Great video! How do you think the SPP would compare in this test with the big mono coil? I ask because I think I could make the SPP waterproof pretty easily since it is small. Thanks again!
larry trigg I have not tried the SSP but I would be curious to see how it performs head to head with these other PI detectors.
Thank you for this test! Much appreciated. At what depth does the CTX3030 detects the nickel? (with no disc, no ground balance and sens at 28?) I would love to see more testing videos
Booleys The CTX will go 10-12" on a nickel in wet salt water sand depending on the settings. If you could run your detector in manual 28 sensitivity and its stable, you should hear the nickel in that 10-12" range.
I live in Australia and own a Garrett Infinium. I like the machine but it is very hard to ground balance in mineralised soil. I get great depth out of the machine but from all the videos I have seen the TDI pro looks like a step up in performance for a similar price machine. Would you recommended upgrading?
F0X4 You will find the TDI Pro will go deeper that the Infinium. I also find the TDI Pro to be very stable even at high gain. I have used the TDI Pro in the heavily mineralized dirt of Culpeper Va and it worked very well.
Thanks for posting this excellent video. I look forward to you testing the ATX with a mono coil under the same conditions. I'd speculate that you'd get the 18" nickel with a mono coil. Would it have the stability of the TDI with it's mono coil, under the conditions as in this video.
I would agree that the ATX should get about the same depth as a TDI Pro if using a mono coil. I also look forward to seeing the depth and stability results. Thanks for watching.
Could you repeat that at a depth of 200' please.?
I use the older TDI with the big box and battery. The thing is a beautiful beast on the beach. Goes deeper then hell. Lol
Finaly I have white's my tdi pro, but is to noisy than the tdi sl, can share me you setting please?
If you use it at the beach, it will be noisy especially if you raise and lower your coil. Keep it level and sweep slowly. Remember a PI detector is constantly retuning itself. I run at full power with the GEB off and the pulse rate about 12.
First thanks for producing this video must have been lots of work but is a great comparison of some deep seeking beach machines. One question about the settings on the Infinium. According the user manual and the posting I have read online you get the best depth using it when you have the ground balance set to Lock and you had it on slow which is known to reduce depth. Was the machine unstable unless you turned on the slow ground tracking?
+Stephen Pearsall I tried the Infinium on all settings and achieved the best signal response when set to slow; The Infinium was stable at all settings. Thanks
+DetectorComparisons Thanks for the answer - I have one its way to me and have been reading the manual and watching Garrett's and other's videos on the machine so was very interested to hear about your results. According the documentation you should only need to run on slow in very heavy mineralized areas. I intend to use it on beaches in northern Mass, NH, and southern Maine many of which have a lot of black sand mixed in the beach sand.
+Stephen Pearsall I hunt the CT and NY shores and some of the beaches are very rocky with black sand. You may also have your best results running in slow depending your levels of minerals/black sand. Good luck hunting up there!
What were the settings on ur TDI? Pulse @10, geb off, what about gain? Set on low for conductors? Don't know much about the Pro but like it's depth. I thought the coil was dual field, am I mistaken? Got alot of learning on this machine. Thanks
+John Saldivar Gain all the way up, GEB off, pulse delay at 10-12.
Thank u sir, much appreciated
Thanks for sharing, I have to use Sovereign on my beaches because of iron, I want to see comparison PI to Minelab BBS machines, regards.
+Bosman Boss There is no comparison when it comes to raw depth. What sounds good on a PI is hardly noticeable on a BBS detector. I have tested a CTX with the 17" coil and could not hear signals that I heard clearly with the TDI Pro with a 12" coil. But as you know, there is a trade off, if you want the depth of a PI, you will have to dig the iron that your Sovereign ignores. The Sovereign is a slow processing detector so if there is a lot of iron around, it is probably masking good targets. I use an Excalibur which is essentially a waterproof Sovereign and I have had good results with the 15" NEL coil going very deep but I could not use it in an iron infested area.
Thank you for all your videos I'd like your opinion whether the Infinium LS or the Equinox 800 would be better for northern BC prospecting gold thank you
Depending on the severity of the mineralization. If real heavy, go with the PI detector otherwise the Equinox at 40kHz should hit lots of small gold.
Thank you for your quick reply
Hi DC, would you please list the settings you use for the TDI on the wet beach, thanks
GEB off, Gain at 100%, Pulse delay 10-12 and the threshold where you can just hear it..... This is what was used on the TDI Pro
Thanks DC for the settings
I don't see enough videos with the sand shark? Any more on the way? How good a product for the price?
+zipngo1 The Sand Shark is a good basic PI unit. I use the TDI Pro or ATX because of the extreme depth but depending where you are, the Sand Shark will work just fine.
Thanks for sharing!!! Sand shark is 8" or 10.5" coil? I'm considering to buy sand shark.
+노해영 10.5" Coil.
is the tdi a good machine for dry land? no water or wet sand where i stay. thanks
very good relic machine in highly mineralize dirt
Really enjoy your videos,have recommended them to other detectorists. Was curious if you had to choose between ATX or TDI which would you prefer?
Thanks for the kind words. When deciding on the one PI machine, it all depends on what type of hunting you do. When I want to work a salt water swimming area while wading (going in and out of the salt water), I use the ATX. If I’m just working the wet salt water sand, I use the TDI Pro. If I’m looking for micro gold jewelry in wet salt water sand or gold nuggets in the field, I use the ATX. Both the TDI Pro and ATX have incredible depth but you have to look at all features and decide what is important to you.
For daily hunting on the beach I prefer my white TDI because it is lightweight . For micro jewelry I use my Garret atx ,for very deep hunting when the beach has been hunted to death I love to use my Garrett atx with the big 20 inch monocoil . So i always find some good big yellow ...
nice video,,any big depth difference with the TDI Pro vs. TDI SL..?.....thanks,,,
The Pro is deeper than the S/L.
Complimenti,bel video e bel test, Fino ad ora non ho ancora avuto il piacere di testare una di queste macchine ad impulso,secondo mè per spazzolare in battigia dove batte l'onda,sarebbero l'ideale,Grazie per la condivisione,Ciao Endriu.!
Is that salt water beach ? How much black sand?
Kaleigh Compton Yes, its salt water. Some black sand but the PI's handle it well.
I like your test method. Thanks
can anyone tell me which pi detector searches deep but also goes underwater (deeper than 3 metres) ?
keithbenefit I saw your posting.You want deep on land and under water.Check out the Fisher CZ-21 metal detector.They have videos here on youtube.You can go 200 feet under water.I haven't seen a detector than can go deeper for targets.
i would like to see you do the same video again accept use a cxt3030,excal2,fisher cz21,bh id
+Joe Trino i can tell you the excal beats the ctx in depth but as far as the bh id thats probably a bit deeper than the excal it being a p.i
Maybe I'm wrong but turning the pulse width to max on the sand shark would decrease depth. Why did you do that?
On the Sand Shark, a pulse width of max gives you the most depth
Can you make a video comparing the equinox 800 with the same machines you used in this video please thanks.
No need to.... there is no comparison in terms of depth. At 10" the nickel will start to disappear in the best conditions. I use the Equinox while wading.
@@DetectorComparisons thank you for your replay, i have another question I'm looking to buy another machine for parks and beach and need to be deeper, with all your metal detecting experience wich would you recommend the Equinox 800 or CTX 3030 no matter the price, Also i already have the Tdi pro, Xp deus
Tdi beach hunter, Thanks in advance.
xp Deus, Thanks.
@@diggingforgold4150 I personally use the Equinox 800 and XP Deus. Those are my favorite two land machines. A lot is personal preference so its hard to say what would be best for you.
how deep will the tdi go on gold ? and are you in salt water ?
On low conductive targets like gold, the TDI Pro will go very deep.. Yes, this test was done at a salt water beach.
Yes I confirm the TDI SL TDI PRO and the Garrett ATX are much deeper on gold as any multi frequency detector on wet salt water . Go for it .
Good comparison👍do you the difference between the tdi pro an de tdi sl?
The TDI SL is not nearly as sensitive as the TDI pro. The TDI pro is a deeper machine. I have used them both extensively come with the GB off I go about 4" deeper on a nickel.
Thanks for the information, I can’t find the Tdi pro but only the tdi sl is forsale
Have you done this test with your TDI SL yet.
General opinion is that the TDI SL has slightly less depth, but I have not seen a realistic test like this. Anecdotal evidence does not really help.
Thanks
There is a big difference between the TDI S/L and the TDI Pro. The S/L is more in line with the Duel Field when it comes to depth. The TDI Pro is much deeper. I have done side by side tests with both machines and I can hear a mans gold ring at 18" with the TDI Pro and with the TDI S/L, I can hear the same ring 12"-13".
That is true . The TDI PRO is more powerful on a neutral ground . But the TDI SL is stable like a rock . So on heavy mineralised beaches I can crank up the gain to it's maximum without any problem , whereas it is not possible to go more than 50%of the gain on a TDI PRO without stability issues . .So I am more comfortable and effective with my TDI SL in a daily highly mineralised hunting situation . Even my Garret atx does not handle these harsh conditions as well as my TDI SL. I hope this helps .
96 / 5000
Resultados de traducción
Hello everybody. What advantages or problems would it have in using a tdi in other areas that or are beach
Using it on land, you will dig everything including a lot of iron.
put the Sov GT with WOT 15 coil and the CTX in the equation
Do you use the ATX often?
I have used it at the beach and its very good on small gold jewelry while still going deep for larger targets.
I love my garret ATX . It is more sensible than my TDI SL on very small targets Ndecko on very deep ones . Nevertheless the TDI SL is very much light weight and very fast . I love both of them for what they are good at .
Had the TDI before but didn't like the lack of water resistance . If Whites made a similar machine but waterproof , that would sell like hot cakes.
Richard Newcombe EXACTLY! I don’t understand why Whites doesn’t do that!! What a killer pulse this would make wading in the sea!
WAS ATX MAXED OUT? GOOD VIDEO, THANKS
Yes. It was all the way up to 13.
THANKS =)
....you should not search with the Infinium in the slow or fast mode. Those settings are for ground balancing only. Always detect in the locked mode.....
If you are in an area where there is black sand or heavy minerals, searching in locked means you will have to reground balance the detector as ground conditions change. Garrett recommends searching in locked when you can, but if you are in an area with high minerals or black sand, searching in slow or fast is recommended by Garrett.
i think a vlf machine like minelab quattro/safari can compete that depth in wet sand.
Fine ! Make a test Sir and show us !
Best to just go with a Excal or CZ-21 🌴💦
I'd go atx 400 all day, everyday!
Looking forward to you doing the same test with the new AT MAX!!!
Not a great test....pi's like to have no air gap between the coil and sand.Also,the infinium should do better than that.......my seahunter with the 14" coil would pick up the targets better than the infinium in that test and it shouldn't.
dude... unlpug the headphones si we can hear. Spoiled the vid.
Some of the detectors don't have internal speakers. Ones that do, you can hear them in the video. Turn up the volume....