@@lasersaber Hey man, what happened to your website? It would be a real shame if all that stuff was no longer available. Couldn't be more happy and excited to see you back!
Lasersaber! You're back! I was wandering around your channel not to long ago wondering if you were doing anything interesting? Great to have you back. You are responsible for a lot of the interest I have now. Your videos were the first.
the keyword is "scan pattern" you light single photo cell at a time at narrow beam. You need to all photo cell receive a light to have a reasonable voltage at the cells connected in series .
This. Basically, your whole panel is "shaded" except for the one spot the laser is hitting. I bet you could get the same output from a much smaller solar panel (Maybe even a single cell).
@@lorenwbrown This is only correct to a point. Atoms are 99% empty space, yet they feel very solid to us. The only factor that matters, is how rapidly the solar panel can absorb energy, which could be calculated using a scan pattern, on a single small cell, by having it pulse, at faster and faster speeds, till it is on more than it is off. most likely, there is a limit, to how long the beam can be off to get power, though, if he's lighting anything at all, its relatively speaking, very close as is.
@@lorenwbrown you are absolutely right. If you shade just one single cell of a solar panel it won't work. I'm surprised he got any power out at all the individual solar cells must have a tiny bit of capacitance and this is the only reason he got any output.
Perhaps the use of a sheet of some fluorescent or phosphorescent material which has a slight delay between absorption and emission(like glow in the dark pigments) could improve the(for lack of a better term) impedance matching between the laser and the panel, improving total energy transfer at the expense of peak theoretical system power(due to stokes shift).
@@AtlasReburdened solar panels need bright light this would probably give a more stable output but only at a fraction of the panels rated power. You would also be blocking and reflecting some of the beam causing more power loss. However that is an interesting solution.
You could probably do a tight scan pattern on a monocrystaline panel but that looks like a combined panel all wired together. That means if one or 2 of the mini cells are powered the remaining non-illuminated panels become resistance, so the bulb wont light up.
Laser have been used for Years for Power Transfer for Optical Relays - In trans Sea Optic cables + Long Distance Land Optical Links Sadly open Air links have Air (Oxygen + other gas elemnts) and water moisture Scatting the beam even Gas Elements adjusting Light Frequency's (Rainbow Refraction + Light "Lens" Scatter ) If you look at StarLink -Laser communication They work better in Vacuum of Space and give more Bandwidth UV Has more energy it why you see it Excite "Fluorescent" other colours
Based on the solar panels optimal frequency ranges of light (colors) used for translating to electricity... that's the color range you should choose. The newest solar panels are multi layer so each layer is optimized to absorb a specific color range where the best penetrating color is the lowest layer. I think quad junctions (four layers) are on the market. Wondering if you used a Fresnel lens to focus the beam down will help recollect more of the energy. Then wondering what the power is from a DMM reading to see what the losses are over the distance. Thanks for sharing!
Suggestions... Use a full spectrum Lazer or full spectrum LEDs. With LEDs, they blink, so use separate series timing to fill holes. Interesting that you choose light as the medium. Everyone else is into wireless charging with EM. Let's see...heat, pressure, sound, ... Ooo, momentum. Send a heavy spinning wheel down a track to a receiver, that then uses what's left for output torque, like for a generator. Momentum transfer of power through a flywheel and track. (Something tells me that I've seen this before somewhere...) Tangent, sorry There's lots of room for discovery in this field... funny how it took us over 100 years to catch on. See Nicola Tesla
When scanning a single laser dot across a solar panel aren’t you effectively getting a small point of the cell activated at any one point in time? Solar panels respond extremely quickly to light so the scanning laser would be very slow relative to the panel response. I wonder if you would be better off using some sort of lens near the solar panel to scatter a single beam? Or maybe focus the laser to a larger dot at the range you’re covering.
Glad To see you back now that you’re back are you going To fix your website and have more detailed information about some of the stuff you buy and make?
Hi Mr. lasersaber, I’ve been following your incredible videos on supercapacitors and truly admire your expertise. My client is exploring large-scale supercapacitor manufacturing, and your insights could be invaluable. Specifically, we’re curious about scalability (large units vs. clusters), real-world performance vs. traditional batteries, and challenges in production. Would you be open to a quick discussion? Looking forward to your response!
The first time I came across transferring something along a laser beam was about 10 or so years ago when I saw some videos on TH-cam on sending audio via lasers. Quite intering stuff, especially when combined with other rhings, such as power transfer using solar panels such as you've shown in this video. I hope you can expand on this experiment further in the future, it'll be interesting to see what you come up with. 👍
I think the cells not being illuminated enough at the same time is a likely issue. I have to ideas to try. Would a parabolic reflector make a difference? Would an infrared laser be more efficient at that distance?
Very interesting. I take it the laser is at only one place at a time? In that case, it'll only be energising one cell at a time, meaning no current can pass the unlit panels except for capacitively. That might be okay if the scan pattern is fast enough that not very much charge can accumulate over the junction. I've got no idea why a smaller pattern would perform worse. Perhaps it's a case of the laser moving slower between each cell, meaning more charge accumulating per cell and thus less current being able to pass.
I would say research the photoelectric effect more if you haven’t already. The higher the frequency of light the more energy is in the photon. Ideally you want an all violet beam bc it has the highest energy/frequency in the visible spectrum or a laser that can produce a UV beam. Also the solar panel you are using is for a “large” area of light. I believe they make some that are designed to take in a more focused beam.
which solar cell you are using in this video?? Could you please tell me whr you bought it from or ordered online, I wanna buy one, here in india we dont get it.
Forgive me as I haven't thought about light for while. I did learn about light from a 3D artist, kinds of light, the terms at which light is emitted... but since I've been away from creating Light in 3D, I have also lost my vocabulary. The bulb in the sky emits a radial emission that decreases rapidly as the waves lengthen (there is a word for this, but just trying to get my idea out). So, my idea for using a laser to cast energy long distances, why not try a laser that spreads or widens? I'm thinking wave-lengths. Emissions? My jargon is a little lost as I've been out of this train of thought for a while now, but I hope my point came across. cheers!
I wish people would stop quoting Tesla so much I mean yes he was definitely needed, But people need to start looking into John Searl And the Searl experiments seg magnetics Good video
I have an idea 😱!!!! IF: Lightspeed /hz = distance... And we have an 40.000km big earth.. Reciver Can we use: c/earth distance = 7,8 hz.. Use for earth electic energy o.O ??? Is it possible anyway with coils or so ?
Use the laser to put out just a stationary beam and use a lens to spread the beam. If you have a single cell of a solar panel in the shade it will not work yet you are scanning a single point of light across the entire panel this will never work. Also solar panels at their very best might be 20% efficient so if you're using a 1-watt laser you'll be lucky to get 200 milliwatts out of the panel.
Do the simple test put your solar panel in the sun to run your LED light now use a piece of cardboard to cover up one single cell of your solar panel it will likely shut off. I think the only reason you got any power out at all was that your scan frequency is fast enough that the individual solar cells capacitance is enough to output a voltage while the beam is on another cell running LED. I'm incredibly surprised you had any output at all.
The idea of being blinded by or inadvertently blinding someone else has always me uncomfortable with lasers. And the fact that it's so easily intercepted just makes it seem like a lousy power source.
Don't solar panels operate most efficiently in UV light? UV Photons have the highest energy of non-ionizing radiation. Maybe experiment with different wavelengths of light?
This really isn't new we were doing stuff like this in 4-H science camp 30 years ago. The fact that people on TH-cam think they're going to come up with something that hasn't been thought of yet or isn't being worked on at MIT or Caltech is f****** hilarious!
A) he's not claiming any new discoveries here and B) I've seen numerous discoveries worthy of publication in the scientific literature first made in a youtube video
Studying the small details and real experimenting are the path to discovery. Try to squash that and you stagnate progress. Negative input is irrelevant and unhelpful in the path to progress.
@@SystemsPlanet I don't who you're replying to, but peer review is the sine qua non of legitimate scientific inquiry. Maybe f off back to your Brett Weinstein anti-peer review circle jerk and leave science to people who actually know how to think rationally.
@@Muonium1 I think peer review as a concept has been ruined by over-centralization in institutions that have become dogmatic and completely resistant to change. Really, capitalism has become a better alternative. If millions of people buy your product and are satisfied with it, that's better than about half of the scientific studies published in academic journals.
You're back!!!! 🔥
Finally!
@@lasersaber Hey man, what happened to your website? It would be a real shame if all that stuff was no longer available. Couldn't be more happy and excited to see you back!
@@lasersaber are you going to sell the Tesla torch parts again?
Welcome back sir
Lasersaber! You're back! I was wandering around your channel not to long ago wondering if you were doing anything interesting? Great to have you back. You are responsible for a lot of the interest I have now. Your videos were the first.
So glad that you're back at it!
Thank you so much for your work 👍
YES!! he is back!
Thank you for coming back. Hope all is well
Glad your back cant wait for you videos. This is why I watch you. Keep up the good work.
Glad to see you are still doing your thing mate. Been a fan of yours for years and hope to be for many more to come.
Nice to see you again :)
You inspire me with many ideas from your videos
Dude! You return.
Thought we'd lost ya.
Welcome back
Finally,, you worried me for awhile 🤪
Welcome back!
Thanks.
badass mate, keep up the nifty concepts.
the keyword is "scan pattern" you light single photo cell at a time at narrow beam. You need to all photo cell receive a light to have a reasonable voltage at the cells connected in series .
This. Basically, your whole panel is "shaded" except for the one spot the laser is hitting. I bet you could get the same output from a much smaller solar panel (Maybe even a single cell).
@@lorenwbrown This is only correct to a point.
Atoms are 99% empty space, yet they feel very solid to us.
The only factor that matters, is how rapidly the solar panel can absorb energy, which could be calculated using a scan pattern, on a single small cell, by having it pulse, at faster and faster speeds, till it is on more than it is off.
most likely, there is a limit, to how long the beam can be off to get power, though, if he's lighting anything at all, its relatively speaking, very close as is.
@@lorenwbrown you are absolutely right. If you shade just one single cell of a solar panel it won't work. I'm surprised he got any power out at all the individual solar cells must have a tiny bit of capacitance and this is the only reason he got any output.
Perhaps the use of a sheet of some fluorescent or phosphorescent material which has a slight delay between absorption and emission(like glow in the dark pigments) could improve the(for lack of a better term) impedance matching between the laser and the panel, improving total energy transfer at the expense of peak theoretical system power(due to stokes shift).
@@AtlasReburdened solar panels need bright light this would probably give a more stable output but only at a fraction of the panels rated power. You would also be blocking and reflecting some of the beam causing more power loss. However that is an interesting solution.
Stoked to see a new video from you!!!!
You could probably do a tight scan pattern on a monocrystaline panel but that looks like a combined panel all wired together. That means if one or 2 of the mini cells are powered the remaining non-illuminated panels become resistance, so the bulb wont light up.
you are a work of wonder. so many devices. you are an inspiration to us all.
Welcome back hope u were fine
Welcome back Sir Genius!
Awesome experiments, specially the issue with the narrower pattern.
I bet you are right in your guess
Now if you just could use a BLACK LASER so that the Laser Light couldn't be seen. Good Video Mate. Thinking outside the Box?
I like your new logo 🙂👍
Laser have been used for Years for Power Transfer for Optical Relays - In trans Sea Optic cables + Long Distance Land Optical Links
Sadly open Air links have Air (Oxygen + other gas elemnts) and water moisture Scatting the beam even Gas Elements adjusting Light Frequency's (Rainbow Refraction + Light "Lens" Scatter )
If you look at StarLink -Laser communication They work better in Vacuum of Space and give more Bandwidth
UV Has more energy it why you see it Excite "Fluorescent" other colours
Based on the solar panels optimal frequency ranges of light (colors) used for translating to electricity... that's the color range you should choose. The newest solar panels are multi layer so each layer is optimized to absorb a specific color range where the best penetrating color is the lowest layer. I think quad junctions (four layers) are on the market. Wondering if you used a Fresnel lens to focus the beam down will help recollect more of the energy. Then wondering what the power is from a DMM reading to see what the losses are over the distance. Thanks for sharing!
Amazing work. I've been reading about Tesla recently as well
Suggestions...
Use a full spectrum Lazer or full spectrum LEDs. With LEDs, they blink, so use separate series timing to fill holes.
Interesting that you choose light as the medium. Everyone else is into wireless charging with EM. Let's see...heat, pressure, sound, ...
Ooo, momentum. Send a heavy spinning wheel down a track to a receiver, that then uses what's left for output torque, like for a generator. Momentum transfer of power through a flywheel and track.
(Something tells me that I've seen this before somewhere...)
Tangent, sorry
There's lots of room for discovery in this field... funny how it took us over 100 years to catch on. See Nicola Tesla
Hi lasersaber! May I ask how you did from 0:37 to 0:43?
It's really like a hovering hologram!!!
You are really great man 😵👍 I mean look at those things you made 🤟
When scanning a single laser dot across a solar panel aren’t you effectively getting a small point of the cell activated at any one point in time? Solar panels respond extremely quickly to light so the scanning laser would be very slow relative to the panel response. I wonder if you would be better off using some sort of lens near the solar panel to scatter a single beam? Or maybe focus the laser to a larger dot at the range you’re covering.
Glad To see you back now that you’re back are you going To fix your website and have more detailed information about some of the stuff you buy and make?
Is that a CommutaCar in the background? I love those things!
he;s back!! nice!!!
Hi Mr. lasersaber, I’ve been following your incredible videos on supercapacitors and truly admire your expertise. My client is exploring large-scale supercapacitor manufacturing, and your insights could be invaluable. Specifically, we’re curious about scalability (large units vs. clusters), real-world performance vs. traditional batteries, and challenges in production. Would you be open to a quick discussion? Looking forward to your response!
The first time I came across transferring something along a laser beam was about 10 or so years ago when I saw some videos on TH-cam on sending audio via lasers. Quite intering stuff, especially when combined with other rhings, such as power transfer using solar panels such as you've shown in this video. I hope you can expand on this experiment further in the future, it'll be interesting to see what you come up with. 👍
I think the cells not being illuminated enough at the same time is a likely issue. I have to ideas to try. Would a parabolic reflector make a difference? Would an infrared laser be more efficient at that distance?
THE POWER OF THE LASER !!!!!!!!!!!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
What would happen if you ran that laser through a magnifying glass? Possibly focus the laser better?
He's back
Very interesting. I take it the laser is at only one place at a time? In that case, it'll only be energising one cell at a time, meaning no current can pass the unlit panels except for capacitively. That might be okay if the scan pattern is fast enough that not very much charge can accumulate over the junction. I've got no idea why a smaller pattern would perform worse. Perhaps it's a case of the laser moving slower between each cell, meaning more charge accumulating per cell and thus less current being able to pass.
Cheyenne, did you have troubles ordering that laser cube? I thought sales were restricted in the US because of the power output.
I would say research the photoelectric effect more if you haven’t already. The higher the frequency of light the more energy is in the photon. Ideally you want an all violet beam bc it has the highest energy/frequency in the visible spectrum or a laser that can produce a UV beam. Also the solar panel you are using is for a “large” area of light. I believe they make some that are designed to take in a more focused beam.
which solar cell you are using in this video?? Could you please tell me whr you bought it from or ordered online, I wanna buy one, here in india we dont get it.
Forgive me as I haven't thought about light for while. I did learn about light from a 3D artist, kinds of light, the terms at which light is emitted... but since I've been away from creating Light in 3D, I have also lost my vocabulary. The bulb in the sky emits a radial emission that decreases rapidly as the waves lengthen (there is a word for this, but just trying to get my idea out). So, my idea for using a laser to cast energy long distances, why not try a laser that spreads or widens? I'm thinking wave-lengths. Emissions? My jargon is a little lost as I've been out of this train of thought for a while now, but I hope my point came across. cheers!
I wish people would stop quoting Tesla so much I mean yes he was definitely needed,
But people need to start looking into John Searl
And the Searl experiments seg magnetics
Good video
Why not make a video powering a solar panel with the sun and call it “wireless energy transfer 150 million km”....
This.
So what is it? Laser Hacker, Laser Saber, Tesla maker? Im confused.
YAY! A new post!
Fascinating stuff 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Nice work!
what about using a maser, higher frequency means more energy right?
That would be lower frequency
For long range energy transfer you want lower frequencies. I believe a maser is a microwave wavelength laser which would work but has its own dangers.
I have an idea 😱!!!!
IF: Lightspeed /hz = distance...
And we have an 40.000km big earth..
Reciver
Can we use: c/earth distance = 7,8 hz..
Use for earth electic energy o.O ??? Is it possible anyway with coils or so ?
LASERSABER !!!!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
How about making a helicopter fly from your laser projector?? It could fly very high
awesome video thanks
where have you been for soooo long>!>!>1
Worth pursuing. Of course the sun transfers energy 93 mil. Miles in this way.
NASA currently has a RFP for energy transfer on the moon. Something like this would be ideal.
@@SystemsPlanet How so?
Meanwhile..
The Sun: "Am I a joke to you?"
The sun is the best source of free wireless energy!
Very nice soon you will be charging satellites in space :-)
Or getting a charge from space solar collectors 🧐
Use the laser to put out just a stationary beam and use a lens to spread the beam. If you have a single cell of a solar panel in the shade it will not work yet you are scanning a single point of light across the entire panel this will never work. Also solar panels at their very best might be 20% efficient so if you're using a 1-watt laser you'll be lucky to get 200 milliwatts out of the panel.
Do the simple test put your solar panel in the sun to run your LED light now use a piece of cardboard to cover up one single cell of your solar panel it will likely shut off. I think the only reason you got any power out at all was that your scan frequency is fast enough that the individual solar cells capacitance is enough to output a voltage while the beam is on another cell running LED. I'm incredibly surprised you had any output at all.
The idea of being blinded by or inadvertently blinding someone else has always me uncomfortable with lasers. And the fact that it's so easily intercepted just makes it seem like a lousy power source.
Don't solar panels operate most efficiently in UV light? UV Photons have the highest energy of non-ionizing radiation.
Maybe experiment with different wavelengths of light?
But UV has lower range due to its higher wavelength
@@NandR Yet, it still makes it to the surface.
👍👍👍
Dude, what's up with agricultural stuff around you? tell us.
Cheers.
SPACE LASERS
YEEEAAAHHH
👍👍💖🙏💖👍👍
This just seems like solar energy with extra steps.
everything humans do is solar energy with extra steps
Cool 👍
LW waves will do it as Tesla did it
Very kool
I alway thought satan was electricity
That's a slightly odd sentence to read on the internet.
laser collimation~
The downvote is probably from an Edison descendant.... Nikola Tesla ROCKS... ;-)
Frigen lasers
😃 wants this bad
first?
This really isn't new we were doing stuff like this in 4-H science camp 30 years ago. The fact that people on TH-cam think they're going to come up with something that hasn't been thought of yet or isn't being worked on at MIT or Caltech is f****** hilarious!
A) he's not claiming any new discoveries here and
B) I've seen numerous discoveries worthy of publication in the scientific literature first made in a youtube video
Studying the small details and real experimenting are the path to discovery. Try to squash that and you stagnate progress. Negative input is irrelevant and unhelpful in the path to progress.
@@SystemsPlanet I don't who you're replying to, but peer review is the sine qua non of legitimate scientific inquiry. Maybe f off back to your Brett Weinstein anti-peer review circle jerk and leave science to people who actually know how to think rationally.
@@Muonium1 I think peer review as a concept has been ruined by over-centralization in institutions that have become dogmatic and completely resistant to change. Really, capitalism has become a better alternative. If millions of people buy your product and are satisfied with it, that's better than about half of the scientific studies published in academic journals.
I am calling Bullshit on all of your videos!
Nicoli Tesla knew it was possible +
Nice work!