How Wireless Energy From Space Could Power Everything | Ali Hajimiri | TED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Modern life runs on wireless technology. What if the energy powering our devices could also be transmitted without wires? Electrical engineer Ali Hajimiri explains the principles behind wireless energy transfer and shares his far-out vision for launching flexible solar panels into space in order to collect sunlight, convert it to electrical power and then beam it down to Earth. Learn how this technology could power everything -- and light up our world from space.
    If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: ted.com/membership
    Follow TED!
    Twitter: / tedtalks
    Instagram: / ted
    Facebook: / ted
    LinkedIn: / ted-conferences
    TikTok: / tedtoks
    The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design - plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
    Watch more: go.ted.com/alihajimiri
    • How Wireless Energy Fr...
    TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: www.ted.com/about/our-organiz.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com
    #TED #TEDTalks #energy
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 466

  • @jam-fam
    @jam-fam 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    This will help us become a type 1 Kardashev scale civilization!
    I hope that all people on earth will get access to it, a whole new open-source community has to be built around this and all nations should be involved. Well done to this team and everyone else involved in taking such a great spot in human history. Wow!

    • @luarbiasawaras8700
      @luarbiasawaras8700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, great

    • @Cosmicwave22
      @Cosmicwave22 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Won't happen if the globalists want to consolidate power and subject the masses, what good is advancement in technology if we as a species haven't evolved spiritually

    • @naveenM.
      @naveenM. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I love how everybody has the same realization, it shows how the collective consciousness has and is shifted and still shifting to higher levels of being

    • @xXxBladeStormxXx
      @xXxBladeStormxXx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Currently we are a type 5 Kardashian scale civilization.

    • @luarbiasawaras8700
      @luarbiasawaras8700 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xXxBladeStormxXx hahaha

  • @andycordy5190
    @andycordy5190 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I can't wait to hear more on this project. Thank you.

  • @MrPinguinzz
    @MrPinguinzz ปีที่แล้ว +64

    i'm annoyed that he did not state how much energy is lost in transmission
    i'm assuming it is AN ABSURD AMOUNT of power wasted to transmit it to ground
    Starlink uses 50W+ just to transmit data to space, i'm curious how inefficient phased array antenna power transmission is

    • @PHILLL94
      @PHILLL94 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I remember in 2010 i asked my physics teacher about wireless energy transfer and he said the same thing. Not very efficient as all, too wasteful

    • @MrPinguinzz
      @MrPinguinzz ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@PHILLL94 Your phone wireless charger is millimeters away and it is already about 50-60% efficient
      If phased array from space to ground achieves more than 10-20% efficiency i would be surprised, but i really have no idea how much is physically possible

    • @Junon15
      @Junon15 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Terrible efficiency just requires a compelling use case.

    • @turolretar
      @turolretar ปีที่แล้ว

      The more terrible, the better

    • @DAR0k88
      @DAR0k88 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The sun produces a bunch of energy that is lost into space and never reaches Earth. Collecting that "wasted" energy is hyper-efficient since it would have never reached earth anyway. It's not as a simple as just measuring the efficiency of the panels like you would with Earth-based solar panels.

  • @abhishekkumar4777
    @abhishekkumar4777 ปีที่แล้ว +254

    Finally the dream of Great Scientist Nikola Tesla coming to reality after a delay of few decades which was caused because of some greedy persons of His time....I wish he could see his invention turning reality 😢

    • @alainpannetier2543
      @alainpannetier2543 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Beam forming technologies have been in use since the 70s at least (e.g. military Russian radars). They are totally commonplace now (see Starlink), in non terrestrial networks and in mMIMO antennas in mobile networks. The use case is information transmission. There is no business case for energy transmission. Also for safety reasons. There's a reason why the power of your smart phone is limited to 2 Watts.

    • @Fracomusica
      @Fracomusica ปีที่แล้ว +10

      But they are not talking about information, they are talking about energy. I understand why energy transmitted wirelessly is dangerous, but how come they don't mention anything about that here?

    • @BigRed259
      @BigRed259 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nikola Tesla made a nice car though his teslas are awesom

    • @brianwnc8168
      @brianwnc8168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      This concept is so far beyond what Tesla was doing. Tesla was simply trying to send large unmanaged voltage potentials through open-air. What he was doing was extremely dangerous. He did not invent this concept. The only similarities are energy moving through air or space instead of using a wire. You Tesla wishful thinking people really misunderstand science. Emotionally wanting to believe something is different from hard science. Tesla was a legend and deserves many credits but his modern followers are quite delusional from precise science.
      The other thing that this presenter completely skipped over is the growing problem of space junk. I don't think this will ever take hold because when you have a large surface areas of thin-film solar panels like he's talking about it will exponentially increase the chance of small particles space junk hitting them. The more things we launched into space, the more this will continue to be a growing problem.
      Notice your emotions as you follow science. We must set those aside when we do true logical analysis in scientific matters. The desire for things to be true creates The Conspiracy Theory type mind.

    • @BigRed259
      @BigRed259 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brianwnc8168 Tesla created a nice car though I’ll give him that

  • @wattshumphrey8422
    @wattshumphrey8422 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Last time I looked at available tech here (some years back...), getting the material to space and assembling it, collecting energy, and beaming it to earth were not the biggest challenges; it was that the energy densities of the beam had to be kept very low so it doesn't fry things on earth (that was with microwaves...).
    At that look, with beam energy densities held below "allowable" limits for human and other exposure, you would need huge antennas on earth to generate significant power. Don't recall sizes, think was many square miles at minimum -- but conclusion then: just put your solar panels in the same space on the ground in sunny places and pump into the grid.
    Will need to look further at this to see what their idea is.
    Beyond that, what looks new and different here is the phased arrays of PV chips and the ability to actively direct beam direction and focal distance. That is cool

    • @grejen711
      @grejen711 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah in that light bulb demo I didn't see anyone sticking there hand right on the receiver.

    • @JC-qx6eq
      @JC-qx6eq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree. 100%.

    • @spencerkarns283
      @spencerkarns283 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the energy density for even the drone is not too dense. There are other videos of them sending the beams through their stomach and putting their hand between the drone and the generator and it is visibly safe for human exposure there@@grejen711

    • @idiomaxiom
      @idiomaxiom 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need a huge area, but you can farm there, and you don't need batteries.

    • @mgm553
      @mgm553 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grejen711 what you are saying has nothing to do with anything. You dont even know what you are talking about.

  • @editingwithbrokay
    @editingwithbrokay 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is great. I first heard of the concept after watching City of the future: Singapore and seeing that they have launched a station in space blew my mind. this technology will help a lot of isolated islands . Not to mention us filmmakers, there will be no need to carry heavy power generators to charge the film gear in the middle of the desert

  • @wisdomhappy587
    @wisdomhappy587 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So Fascinating! Beamforming is a inspiring technology

  • @woljay9362
    @woljay9362 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congrats Dr. Hajimiri and team ! Amazing achievement for humanity, and also a continuation of Ancient Iranians’ Earth-friendly innovations. Afarin!! ❤

  • @jairamgouda
    @jairamgouda ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great to see my favourite professor 😊

  • @iwaniwak6590
    @iwaniwak6590 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    what the password of your wireless energy? hahaha

  • @ratnaranichowdhury2943
    @ratnaranichowdhury2943 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The idea and technology is really so great ....🎉

  • @marco8060
    @marco8060 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I can see this going in so many different ways.
    Hes essentially creating the possibility of a Dyson sphere and some how highlighting the geopolitics of it simultaneously.
    I cant wait to see what happens.

    • @hafidhrendyanto2690
      @hafidhrendyanto2690 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      did someone just said dyson sphere?

  • @ravikirankalal
    @ravikirankalal ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So happy to be alive

  • @AndrejsBoka
    @AndrejsBoka ปีที่แล้ว

    wow! great presentation!

  • @rtv1196
    @rtv1196 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favorite professor.

  • @brendangoosen
    @brendangoosen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow and the elegance of the solution is insane!

    • @timtruett5184
      @timtruett5184 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is elegant except for the cost, the space debris, and the environmental impact.

  • @education.online_frevryone
    @education.online_frevryone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He's in the news now!

  • @solaymannaserzade5804
    @solaymannaserzade5804 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @user-it1ii8nk5e
    @user-it1ii8nk5e ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scary and fascinating at same time🥲

  • @Tintak_hatpin
    @Tintak_hatpin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Keeping the cost and hassle and distance aside , I don't understand how the major problems which you mentioned related to putting panels in Deserts are solved by putting panels in space ?
    You said space receives 8 times more energy received than the surface of the earth because of atmospheric absorption, night, season etc, but all these factors will come into play in case of panels in space too. The energy which you are sending from satellite will also suffer atmospheric absorption, (I can think of ionosphere very quickly which can disrupt electric energy), how about cloud covers etc. And satellite above a lot of countries doesn't always get sunlight, it depends on too many factors, the earths shadow can and will be the there on satellite for long periods. Also what kind of disruption will it cause to flights, birds and other safety etc when you send high powered electric beams from space ? Isn't it more practical to extract the energy when you are receiving it for free here in the surface from the Sun.

  • @user-mn1hn8rt2l
    @user-mn1hn8rt2l 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Im just mind blown by all the emergence of new technology that is happening everyday.

    • @timtruett5184
      @timtruett5184 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There's nothing new about this. This technology is already highly developed decades ago. It has never been done because it's not economical, and it introduces new safety problems and space debris problems that solar power on the ground does not have.

  • @rohilkuhad8277
    @rohilkuhad8277 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Does this require a direct line of sight? Wouldn't that hamper the scalability of the transfer?

  • @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426
    @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The word to power „everything“ is definitely too good to be true.

  • @debasish597
    @debasish597 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    surprisingly this video also partly teaches how aesa radar works using tr modules

  • @mohammedbahta4366
    @mohammedbahta4366 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job Mr

  • @talesmusic739
    @talesmusic739 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's amazing

  • @kevaljoshi4419
    @kevaljoshi4419 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What about the impact of this high energy EM waves on human tissues. How safe is this ?? Any research in this direction would be mandatory

  • @Krishtafa
    @Krishtafa ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Btw, great explanation about how this works 👏

    • @alainpannetier2543
      @alainpannetier2543 ปีที่แล้ว

      He just explained beam forming in layman terms. The electronics is similar to what a Starlink antenna uses.

  • @MrZinoh
    @MrZinoh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In 2006, Huntington Beach CA, and during an R&D meeting at my company, I proposed the concept of developing a wireless charging solution for our cutting-edge laptop brand, "Zinoh." Despite facing skepticism from engineers who initially considered it implausible to transmit electricity through the atmosphere, I held firm to the vision. Today, I'm grateful for the innovative minds that embraced the challenge and turned this once-dismissed idea into a reality. Unfortunately, our brand didn't thrive, but the experience underscores the importance of embracing bold ideas that push the boundaries of what is deemed possible.

  • @VyTran-qc4tr
    @VyTran-qc4tr ปีที่แล้ว

    so good 👍👍

  • @djredrover
    @djredrover ปีที่แล้ว

    3:57 : I think you missed the timing on that joke, mate ahaha. Only kidding of course. Great presentation!

  • @bradleywall2246
    @bradleywall2246 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This would be huge for Mars. Because of the dust storms, solar panels on the surface are less than ideal. This has led us to use miniature nuclear reactors to power our latest and largest rovers.

    • @lalablove665
      @lalablove665 ปีที่แล้ว

      Outer space "above" is a fantasy cartoon. Does not exist. What people call Mars is not a physical object we can reach. It lies in the heavens beyond the firmament.

    • @raoultesla2292
      @raoultesla2292 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought of Musk buying him same. Energy from above without dust storm to keep the NeuraLink factor workers going.

    • @cedriceveleigh
      @cedriceveleigh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But the dust storms that block the sun will also block the beam from this solar panel array, and the cost of building the array on Mars would probably be enormous compared to the already huge cost of doing it on earth. Sounds to me like nuclear is still the way to go on Mars. Nuclear is also a great tool in the arsenal for fighting climate change on earth.

    • @iamBazzy
      @iamBazzy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The beam cannot travel through everything, weather will still be a factor on any planet

  • @Internalview44
    @Internalview44 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Noval concept interesting 😮

  • @Madlion
    @Madlion ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Amazing, so many things are limited by battery time today, especially drones, imagine a plugged in station beaming power to the drone to fly over long distances. Or that all mobile phones will auto charge via a station at home, no nees to put down

    • @jackbusiness7879
      @jackbusiness7879 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder how harmful it can be though especially in large doses. Like a pseudo space laser

    • @clusterstage
      @clusterstage ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "If we can't put a meter on it, we don't want it" -JP Morgan to Nikolai Tesla.

    • @microsoft.co.u
      @microsoft.co.u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tracking a drone with high density wireless power sound like it could go wrong easily. Phones that are always charged would be cool but concentrated high energy beams of microwave pointed at peoples pockets would be very risky.

  • @kwarme
    @kwarme ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The indoor application looks very promising. But for the satellite projection; wouldn't we still need to install a solar panel like infrastructure on the ground to receive the energy? What will be the benefit of this approach? Will it eliminate the need to store energy on the ground? Because that alone would be a big step forward.

    • @microsoft.co.u
      @microsoft.co.u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      its mostly for better energy collection efficiency since solar panels are already not very efficient, and are greatly impacted by the atmosphere greatly reducing the light. its basically collecting solar power unobstructed then transferring the energy to earth as efficiently as possible

    • @ahmetmutlu348
      @ahmetmutlu348 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if they can build a strong enough receiver that can withstand heat... loss will be less if used sometign like laser thats directional.. but another problem is that is bigger problem then loss in this case is destruction risk ratio of that laser/ligh :D

    • @arcodax3302
      @arcodax3302 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Of all the comments you are the only one that I think beyond just looking pretty, I hope you have a good life, you deserve it

  • @nazmulhossain4556
    @nazmulhossain4556 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remarkable

  • @SDFNI3894YR
    @SDFNI3894YR ปีที่แล้ว

    this looks dream

  • @13Clicks
    @13Clicks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. Look around your neighborhood at all the electric lines and poles. Imagine all the poles and lines gone. Imagine not starting wildfires because there are no more high voltage electric cables going for miles in the forest. We need this ASAP.

  • @alexmarr5779
    @alexmarr5779 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is really cool, but what are the caveats to a system like this? EMF for example. In my opinion, more studies should be conducted regarding the EMF with respect to the human body. It is a wave/signal that would technically transmit through the body if one were in-between. Again, I think we could/should pursue these types of wireless energy transfers while in parallel studying best safety approaches.

  • @user-oz5vu9fb9r
    @user-oz5vu9fb9r 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the question for me is the efficienty of the process. this energy need to pass VERY big distance to her destination and through the atmosphere. is it possible? and more important, this approach are enough economical compare to our exsisting solutions?

  • @jacobzhuh
    @jacobzhuh ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The wireless technology was awesomeness🎉

    • @andrewferguson6901
      @andrewferguson6901 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Best wireless tech is still the humble stone. You can throw it, you can smash with it, you can build with it, you can sharpen it.
      Truly. Wireless rocks are the best

  • @jalalkhosravi6458
    @jalalkhosravi6458 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    دمت گرم دایی ،کارت درسته👌

  • @ahmetmutlu348
    @ahmetmutlu348 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i uess moon can be used for this... ie its relatively stationary... atleast more stable then satelites... ie place lots of panels there and beam it from a one emitter to specific position on eart... as its only one stabilising the target point will cost less and easier to adjust compared to satelite based repositionning protocols...

  • @NoXic88
    @NoXic88 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He should have mentioned the results of their experiment!!! :O Did it work at all? Etc. off... now I have to research... and people won't be convinced :( It will hopefully become amazing though! :D

  • @Light-Eater
    @Light-Eater 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It been powering everything since the beginning of this planet.

  • @vasyllizanets7954
    @vasyllizanets7954 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like it!

  • @vanadot
    @vanadot 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Military : So you're saying that we could send a person "some" energy from a distance?

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 ปีที่แล้ว

    'BATTERYLESS BATTERIES': (copy and paste from my files):
    To help power equipment in outer space:
    Potential endless energy source basically anywhere in this universe:
    a. Small aluminum cones with an electrical wire running through the center of the cones, cones spaced apart (not touching I'm thinking) but end to end.
    b. Electromagentic radiation energy in the atmosphere interacts with the aluminum cones.
    c. Jostled atoms and molecules in the cone eventually have some electrons try to get away from other electrons of which those electrons gather at the larger end of the cone, of which also creates an area of positive charge at the smaller end of the cone.
    d. The electron's in the wire are attracted to the positive end of the cone and the positive 'end' in the wire are attracted to the negatively charged end of the cone.
    e. Basically a 'battery' has been created inside the electrical wire itself, different areas of electrical potential. Basically a 'wire battery' or a 'batteryless battery', however one wanted to call it.
    f. Numerous cones placed end to end increases the number of 'batteries' in the wire.
    (In series to increase voltage, in parallel to increase amperage).
    * Via QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics) whereby electromagnetism interacts with electrons in atoms and molecules, one would have to find the correct 'em' frequency for the correct material being utilized for the cones. The shape of the cones could also come into play. The type and size of the wire as well as the type and thickness of the insulation between the cones and the wire would also be factors.
    * Of course also, possibly 2D triangles made up of certain materials with a conductor going down through the center of the triangle could possible achieve the same 'batteryless' battery system.
    * Plus possibly with the 2D concept, layered 2D's that absorb different energy frequencies, thereby increasing the net output.

  • @ramanshariati5738
    @ramanshariati5738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it enables a Dyson swarm!

  • @publicspace234
    @publicspace234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    5:24 did anyone see that jump cut in the demo video?

    • @AchroDev
      @AchroDev 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Came here looking for this comment

  • @punkdigerati
    @punkdigerati ปีที่แล้ว +2

    RF is just a subset of the electromagnetic spectrum, the carrier wave/particle of which is the photon. This is just more complicated solar. It needs a serious cost/benefit analysis versus other forms of solar energy.
    I suspect that the cost of development of the technology, testing, and deployment to space would be a greater cost than deploying ground based solar for the same energy collected.

    • @markrobinowitz8473
      @markrobinowitz8473 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The energy requirements to launch huge amounts of material into space mean this is more suited for a 13 year old's fantasy project, not anything practical.

    • @kravar
      @kravar ปีที่แล้ว

      It is impossible because power loss of any wawe is to big.

  • @yelectric1893
    @yelectric1893 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perhaps a scalable unit panel with sustainment in mind could be the way.

  • @shaunskosana2202
    @shaunskosana2202 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was researching on how to do it already existing technologies, but aslong nothing moves it's better way to make it using components

  • @deviilaxmijsrinivas
    @deviilaxmijsrinivas 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thought is perhaps much ahead of time and that's why there are some ifs and buts...
    If the wireless energy transfer happens, it would be the best green energy revolution ever
    Too good 👍 👌 👏 ❤

  • @shaunlee8618
    @shaunlee8618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s The Powers that Be in the way of progress.

    • @timtruett5184
      @timtruett5184 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't need to use paranoid fantasies about the powers that be to explain why this idea has not been adopted. It does not make sense economically. Solar power is a great thing, but there is no need to put it into space and then being the energy back to antenna on the earth.

  • @SonuKumar-jx4ip
    @SonuKumar-jx4ip ปีที่แล้ว

    endless possibilities ...

  • @MultidimensionalBeing123
    @MultidimensionalBeing123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The perfect UFO stage setting

  • @tillyshimmelstone4332
    @tillyshimmelstone4332 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder about living things in the pathway of the energy likes birds, trees and us and what happens with absorbing that energy and is it dangerous, etc.

  • @berbudy
    @berbudy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow this should be more widely reported than apple vision pro

  • @alainpannetier2543
    @alainpannetier2543 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Getting more energy from space when we can't even get rid of the excess and the Earth is over-heating seems a brilliant idea indeed.

  • @raflititoputra8613
    @raflititoputra8613 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    so genius in progress

    • @JimBob1937
      @JimBob1937 ปีที่แล้ว

      His space idea, as he said, isn't new, but that has more potential. The main issue I suspect is the cost per kWh is likely far higher in expense than any existing energy generation/transmission methods. There is a lot of energy out in the universe, the tricky part is extracting it in a cost effective way.

  • @gunnarMyTube
    @gunnarMyTube 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can the direction changing be vulnerable to some form of external interference ? it seems when directing energy it is important that it gets delivered to a very specific intended location.
    Should some disturbance occur one could envision a misdirected "beam" cause effects harmful to life forms that come subjected to it ?
    On the other hand if possibility for disturbance is low then I imagine it could be difficult for a third party to protect against undesired effects of energy transfer on a 'receiving end' ?
    Concerns of the technology becoming employed in weapons development.

  • @Canada434
    @Canada434 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Energy will reduce twice the distance, and it also depends on the large aperture of the antenna on the ground station. He should have mentioned how much energy is received at ground station from space.

  • @kourosharshadi8376
    @kourosharshadi8376 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you can charge your celphone with wireless sender bcz its electromagnetic wave. buy can you do same in long distance?

  • @nick430781
    @nick430781 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My only concern is possibly biological impact if this goes large scale

  • @sen4674
    @sen4674 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is how @3:27 starlink ground atenaea access the low orbit satellites.

  • @MrBrandonderek2
    @MrBrandonderek2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🔥🔥🔥

  • @lukashattingh7238
    @lukashattingh7238 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cool :)

  • @TheAmericanAmerican
    @TheAmericanAmerican ปีที่แล้ว +40

    For any techy, nerdy, scifi person out there, I cannot recommend enough that you read Isaac Asimov's books and short stories! He was decades ahead of his time and predicted this very technology 70 years ago!

    • @nacho4073
      @nacho4073 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nikola Tesla did it before!

    • @georgesos
      @georgesos ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He was warning humanity, but we are still too greedy and stupid to realize that.
      Especially these "innovators"...

    • @lynnjames6361
      @lynnjames6361 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yessss

    • @fawadahmed7354
      @fawadahmed7354 ปีที่แล้ว

      Techy, Nerdy 😂😂😂😂 why all people involved in technology since childhood are nerdy 😅😅

    • @alainpannetier2543
      @alainpannetier2543 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fawadahmed7354 Difference between a nerd and an engineer is that the nerd will fail to notice the innumerable flaws in that concept and hail it as a long awaited game changer whereas the seasoned engineer will instantly identify them and move on.

  • @Rezin_8
    @Rezin_8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been screaming this since I saw Lex Podcast with Brian Keating ⚠️🌐🧐🤌 Galileo and the lense 🥸 Celestial energy can be harnessed tho provide energy on Earths surface

  • @allens5711
    @allens5711 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @2:05 this must be kinda how prayer works

  • @automateddude
    @automateddude ปีที่แล้ว

    Good speech!

  • @Fabian-bv2dz
    @Fabian-bv2dz ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is such great tech. I can't believe he didn't mention Nikola Tesla as the pioneer of Wireless energy transmition

    • @j3ffn4v4rr0
      @j3ffn4v4rr0 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Tesla never gets his due :(

    • @carphone9385
      @carphone9385 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The same reason why musk doesn't advocate his philosophy - Tesla wasn't driven by money and mirrored socialist ideals of sharing the worlds assets, resources, ideas and its wealth with everyone and not just for the Musks and the other 1% owners of the worlds wealth.

    • @josephdreamz
      @josephdreamz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s the same thing I was going to say 😢. I’m an Electrical engineer and I really love Tesla’s work, when someone takes his ideas to build new inventions without mentioning him it’s so painful 😢

  • @brooksdaniel
    @brooksdaniel ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait so you launched the rocket with your test on board ... did it work!?!? Good god man the suspense

  • @octavia.n
    @octavia.n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Loss of efficiency through the attenuation of signal would mean the panel in space would need to be massive. The cost of launching this massive structure would make it economically unviable. Indoor applications are too niche to reach mass adoption, hence why he’s pitching to a TED audience and not to the market. Interesting idea, but DOA without an actual problem this can solve.

  • @maryjoycejumao-as6509
    @maryjoycejumao-as6509 ปีที่แล้ว +1

  • @FxckRacism
    @FxckRacism 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This could be the precursor to matter conversion and matter conversion the precursor to immortality. If you can conceive of something it's likely possible.

  • @fabion9952
    @fabion9952 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just Amazing…

  • @timtruett5184
    @timtruett5184 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The solar array / antenna would need to be huge. To be economical it would have to be very lightweight. What you end up with is a solar sail that impossible to keep an orbit.
    Another consequence of being so big is that it would be hit by micrometeoroids frequently and generate a large amount of space debris. At the altitude of geosynchronous orbit, the debris cloud would persist essentially forever.
    Finally, suppose this could be done. What would the light pollution be like on Earth from hundreds or thousands of square miles of solar panels?

  • @ikrayussuf606
    @ikrayussuf606 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    😊😊

  • @mikenazers96
    @mikenazers96 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I heard about this from Art Bell 25 years ago.

  • @user-vj4sn1hk3n
    @user-vj4sn1hk3n 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hope you know what you are doing to cloud around the world where all type of factories go up there in space above cloud.

  • @nickmartin3647
    @nickmartin3647 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1. What frequency?
    2. How much power?
    3. Is it funded by defence?

  • @nicolacabasvidani954
    @nicolacabasvidani954 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's wonderful! Please, create a vacuum cleaner without cable. Moving Miele vacuum cleaner on his own cable is something you need to try to understand how messy it is. You loose the will to clean the house.

  • @l.waltermenezes8156
    @l.waltermenezes8156 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing possibilities

  • @pacanosiu
    @pacanosiu ปีที่แล้ว

    you're not ready for the next breakthrough yet
    firstly
    respect+position+trust

  • @AyushSingh-be2nm
    @AyushSingh-be2nm ปีที่แล้ว

    01:51 But where does the energy go? I mean Energy is always conserved.

  • @markrobinowitz8473
    @markrobinowitz8473 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Who gets to control the steering mechanism? I've heard about this fantasy for a half century (read too many sci fi novels as a kid) but the logistics get in the way of taking this seriously.

  • @ridwan8886
    @ridwan8886 ปีที่แล้ว

    AESA and PESA radar?

  • @wohdinhel
    @wohdinhel ปีที่แล้ว

    🌞

  • @raulcasabianca758
    @raulcasabianca758 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is haw the Starlink satelites work

  • @OverwoundGames
    @OverwoundGames ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yeah, let's collect energy from an even larger area of space and concentrate it in the same volume, can't think why that could be a long term problem...

  • @stopscammingman
    @stopscammingman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be great if energy poor regions could benefit from this in the near future.

  • @LetMeGuess2
    @LetMeGuess2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hopefully he’ll live long enough to do this

  • @saeedboroomand830
    @saeedboroomand830 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, technically just an advertisement. What could justify the concept is to know what is the end of the line efficiency? How much of energy these transceivers waste? What is the life time of the panels? Could they survive solar winds? How much energy is required to keep them in the orbit, without solar push? What is the cost and size of the end of the line earth station antennas? What is the transmission loss? How do they compare to alternatives? We know polyamide based substrate should go bad with radiation and thermal stress sooner or later. Well, these questions are being evaluated probably , but then some charts and plots could have helped.
    I see at some point a better future for power transmission only component. Say we have 4 large solar farms in Africa, in Chile, in Australia and in Asian deserts, they can provide a flat power plateau when combined 24-7. Just need massive repeater-reflector-power hubs in the space, and local power receivers on earth. Well, this is maybe too inefficient in the end…

  • @root_x
    @root_x ปีที่แล้ว

    Heading to Dyson spheres soon 😆.

  • @DarkJonas33
    @DarkJonas33 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool sci fi story

    • @Bilangumus
      @Bilangumus ปีที่แล้ว

      It is not science fiction. It is already happening lol. Caltech proved it some days ago.

  • @lifetech4146
    @lifetech4146 ปีที่แล้ว

    When it comes harvesting energy it can be useful, but to employ in delay life as medium then it will be highly inefficient

  • @kilianlindberg
    @kilianlindberg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:29

  • @dawtesla
    @dawtesla 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They already have phased array Directed Energy Weapons (DEW).
    That's all they care about