"My holiday in France is going to be 20% more expensive...". With the weaker pound British Manufacturing is now benefiting - but your holiday is more important?
Really intelligible presentation about why UK citizens voted to leave. I don't know why there are so much negative comments on here, without the use of any substantive arguments. It sounds like a very objective insight with a lot of very useful statistics as a foundation for the view on the short and long term effects. As a EU citizen (I am Dutch), I am very curious as what happened here and what the possible consequences may be.
Because he knows and can articulate the issues but does not understand that if you hate people (Red Zone) with such venom they will react ferociously. We don't care about him and his money anymore. Does he understand why? I know he doesn't, because I listened to his lecture.
It's helpful to know what the problems are and how people are feeling before solutions can be produced. Data shown here can be helpful in looking at what needs to be done. I just saw this as an analysis of why people voted the way they did. To a large extent, it's the job of policy makers to endeavour to bridge the divide between rich and poor, reduce inequality, improve opportunities for the many who feel disempowered.
Big mistake: the UK does not move into the EEA after the divorce is final, unless that is agreed as the solution during the divorce talks. That would require consent from the EU, which is likely to consider a temporary membership of the EEA as just a way to prolong the uncertainty. So if the UK wants to join the EEA, it will have to do so after leaving, and with the intent of staying in. That will take years, because the UK will have to agree that that is the desired long-term solution. In short, the UK will almost certainly be trading with the EU for a number of years on basic WTO terms.
Yes so all these dumb remainers now want a second referendum these dumb f-cks just can't except they lost and people voted to control our borders and stop companies advertizing jobs in the EU and not in the UK.Don't need any more dumb Eastern Europeans thank you.This is another idiot who knows nothing of what will happen.
I voted to leave. Not because of immigration, or issues like that, but because the EU is anti-democratic, and most people agree that it is unreformable. Most people, especially younger people, haven't any knowledge what the agenda is behind the EU. From the outset, the EU (EEC), was a deception. The Referendum was a vote to either live in a democracy, where you choose the people to govern the country, or to live in a federal state, and be dictated to by un-elected bureaucrats, who want to 'micro-manage' every element of our lives, the other stuff really is irrelevant. I have been sharing this around, and would encourage people to read it. beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/08/the-nazi-fascist-origins-of-the-eu-superstate-3195288.html
Slight mistake at 25.50. It was £350m and not bn. per week that was promised to the NHS. Also, as I listened to the podcast before seeing this film, I was confused by the statement that "61% of leave voters" want a second referendum, when later seeing that the slide says "remain voters".
It was not a promise. "Lets" or this "could" prepositions in the sentence means that this is something that might be achieved. It should be taken literally if the people MAKING the statement were actually in the treasury. SO you are the issue, not them.
nick sim There is no way Brussels will let you be in the single market without free movement. And there is no way Westminster lobbies would allow you to geopardize UK place in the single market. So it seems like a lost cause.
If the UK gov now gets off its arse and sets to work sealing trade deals with the rest of the world during the two year leaving period, then Brussels will fall over itself to create a new deal with the UK,... and without free movement, because we buy more from the EU than the EU buys from us !
No, that's a hasty generalization. Just because he was wrong with one prediction, it is jumping to a conclusion that he will be wrong about all the rest. And look how many times Farage has stepped down and popped back up. Who really know what any of these politicians will do.
Gotta be honest. I started to think that these "expert opinions/predictions" are not worth much. Seems like given all the information, my or your predictions are as good as his.
Are you deaf? As far as I hear, he says it is between Boris and Theresa, with Boris being a favorite unless he is outflanked. And guess what? He WAS a favorite, right up until Gove decided to drive off the cliff with Boris in a passenger seat. The only thing the man did not predict was that it will be Boris's retarded buddy which will do the outflanking and not Theresa herself.
1900 - peace and universal prosperity - London - financial capital of the world 1920 - Europe is broken and in decline 1940 - France invaded by Hitler and the anticipation of a general war 1960 - universal peace and prosperity - New York - a financial capital 1980 - crises and three opposition: USSR, the US, and China 2000 - the Soviet Union, and completely destroyed, the peace and universal prosperity 2020 -? cycles of crises and wars? - Who will be the financial center?
45 min of statistics, supposition and recalling what happened from Hix's opinion. Why such an amount of time was based around regurgitation and emotionalism concerns me. Get on with the way that we will go forward. We have made a choice and you should be helping rather than hindering. He seems to have forgotten that we did not play well in Brussels. We were not a "good" member as we were not integrated into the membership by accepting the euro as the monetary requirement. We are also dictated to without regress. Not the type of positive talk I was hoping for. Hix is the type of professional that should be a career politician. Says nothing and offers nothing of value with MANY words.
"My holiday in France is going to be 20% more expensive...". With the weaker pound British Manufacturing is now benefiting - but your holiday is more important?
Very well reasoned and cogent analysis.
Really intelligible presentation about why UK citizens voted to leave. I don't know why there are so much negative comments on here, without the use of any substantive arguments. It sounds like a very objective insight with a lot of very useful statistics as a foundation for the view on the short and long term effects. As a EU citizen (I am Dutch), I am very curious as what happened here and what the possible consequences may be.
Because he knows and can articulate the issues but does not understand that if you hate people (Red Zone) with such venom they will react ferociously. We don't care about him and his money anymore. Does he understand why? I know he doesn't, because I listened to his lecture.
Fantastic summary of where we are and I'm watching this two weeks later.
Still watching this 6 years later and it still valid, aside of the predictions that good sense will prevail.
Quiet a Snobbish Guy, this does not help to bridge the divide between the rich and poor.
It's helpful to know what the problems are and how people are feeling before solutions can be produced. Data shown here can be helpful in looking at what needs to be done. I just saw this as an analysis of why people voted the way they did. To a large extent, it's the job of policy makers to endeavour to bridge the divide between rich and poor, reduce inequality, improve opportunities for the many who feel disempowered.
Big mistake: the UK does not move into the EEA after the divorce is final, unless that is agreed as the solution during the divorce talks. That would require consent from the EU, which is likely to consider a temporary membership of the EEA as just a way to prolong the uncertainty.
So if the UK wants to join the EEA, it will have to do so after leaving, and with the intent of staying in. That will take years, because the UK will have to agree that that is the desired long-term solution.
In short, the UK will almost certainly be trading with the EU for a number of years on basic WTO terms.
6:28 He says "only 4%", but 4% of 51.9% is 2.07%. A 2.1% swing from Leave to Remain would result in a 50.2-49.8 win for remain.
Yes so all these dumb remainers now want a second referendum these dumb f-cks just can't except they lost and people voted to control our borders and stop companies advertizing jobs in the EU and not in the UK.Don't need any more dumb Eastern Europeans thank you.This is another idiot who knows nothing of what will happen.
And you do? Judging from your use of vitriol, and unsubstantiated statements, I won't be listening to any of your political 'expertise'
To be fare the Remain camp also spewed much BS.
*****
It wasn't 100% provable fact either.
I voted to leave. Not because of immigration, or issues like that, but because the EU is anti-democratic, and most people agree that it is unreformable. Most people, especially younger people, haven't any knowledge what the agenda is behind the EU. From the outset, the EU (EEC), was a deception. The Referendum was a vote to either live in a democracy, where you choose the people to govern the country, or to live in a federal state, and be dictated to by un-elected bureaucrats, who want to 'micro-manage' every element of our lives, the other stuff really is irrelevant. I have been sharing this around, and would encourage people to read it. beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/08/the-nazi-fascist-origins-of-the-eu-superstate-3195288.html
regulation exists eu or no
Itsnotforourconvenience :That's a myth.
I was just waiting for the wig to fall off the guy at the start.
I want to join LSE!!!
You need to have at least 2 A-Grades at A2 and an A* in A2 Level. Also in many subjects you need to have A-Level Maths and Further Maths.
You should watch the lecture, Preserve Democracy, It's not what you think.
Britain can "fix" itself and, it will !
It already did. Remarkable, really, I had the vet do it for my dog, but Britain managed to do it to itself.
Slight mistake at 25.50. It was £350m and not bn. per week that was promised to the NHS. Also, as I listened to the podcast before seeing this film, I was confused by the statement that "61% of leave voters" want a second referendum, when later seeing that the slide says "remain voters".
million or billion, it was still a fake promise.
It was not a promise. "Lets" or this "could" prepositions in the sentence means that this is something that might be achieved. It should be taken literally if the people MAKING the statement were actually in the treasury. SO you are the issue, not them.
More reason for May to reject free movement completely. I fear that if she doesn't, both the Tory and Labour parties will be finished.
nick sim
There is no way Brussels will let you be in the single market without free movement. And there is no way Westminster lobbies would allow you to geopardize UK place in the single market. So it seems like a lost cause.
If the UK gov now gets off its arse and sets to work sealing trade deals with the rest of the world during the two year leaving period, then Brussels will fall over itself to create a new deal with the UK,... and without free movement, because we buy more from the EU than the EU buys from us !
It looks like Hilary will lose to Trump given the analysis of the Brexit vote given here.
Hopefully,eh?
He predicted that Boris Johnson would be the next PM (after 1:13:00) :) There goes his credibility :)
No, that's a hasty generalization. Just because he was wrong with one prediction, it is jumping to a conclusion that he will be wrong about all the rest. And look how many times Farage has stepped down and popped back up. Who really know what any of these politicians will do.
Gotta be honest. I started to think that these "expert opinions/predictions" are not worth much. Seems like given all the information, my or your predictions are as good as his.
Are you deaf? As far as I hear, he says it is between Boris and Theresa, with Boris being a favorite unless he is outflanked. And guess what? He WAS a favorite, right up until Gove decided to drive off the cliff with Boris in a passenger seat. The only thing the man did not predict was that it will be Boris's retarded buddy which will do the outflanking and not Theresa herself.
Please can you come back and read your comment. Please.
1900 - peace and universal prosperity - London - financial capital of the world
1920 - Europe is broken and in decline
1940 - France invaded by Hitler and the anticipation of a general war
1960 - universal peace and prosperity - New York - a financial capital
1980 - crises and three opposition: USSR, the US, and China
2000 - the Soviet Union, and completely destroyed, the peace and universal prosperity
2020 -? cycles of crises and wars? -
Who will be the financial center?
Excellent lecture
1:01:33 keep dreaming, bastards !
You are a professor and you can't differentiate between Roll and Role. It just goes to show that being educated doesn't mean you are clever.
Well, if you refer to the first speaker, clearly English is not his native language...
He's referring to one of the slides, which says "roll", when it should have said "role". It was just a typo.
Just a typo? Do that on your C.V you'll find it in the bin!
45 min of statistics, supposition and recalling what happened from Hix's opinion. Why such an amount of time was based around regurgitation and emotionalism concerns me. Get on with the way that we will go forward. We have made a choice and you should be helping rather than hindering.
He seems to have forgotten that we did not play well in Brussels. We were not a "good" member as we were not integrated into the membership by accepting the euro as the monetary requirement. We are also dictated to without regress.
Not the type of positive talk I was hoping for. Hix is the type of professional that should be a career politician. Says nothing and offers nothing of value with MANY words.
Well, I live in India. We invented Fascism.
Scary Stuff, just proves Cleggs Lies.
nice wig lmao
well spotted lol
Haha the whining of academia.
*****
;) thanks sir :D