@@Kagetora- For me, out of what you've mentioned, only NV was enjoyable, and mainly because it wasn't made by Bethesda. Main problem that they have, is that their writers follow the "Keep it simple, stupid" rule to writing. They intentionally make their stories dumb and shallow to appeal to "mainstream audience".
@@Kagetora-new Vegas wasn’t made by Bethesda and Skyrim was unplayable at launch especially on PlayStation so you only have 1 to compare fallout 4 on top of this Bethesda games are like wine they get better with age.
I don't get this. Every location of interest in every Bethesda game was segmented by loading screens. Every house/cave/town/city/dungeon etc. This game is no different but people are losing their minds over it. You can go from a planet's surface to a specific location on another planet in another system in a single loading screen if you want to.
@@emarskineel "Every location of interest in every Bethesda game was segmented by loading screens." They were all connected by an outer world map you could explore in control of your character. Starfield has no such thing, the tiles the game lets you explore are a minuscule part of the entire game, they are also mostly empty.
@@emarskineel Because No Man's Sky demonstrated that you COULD do seamless spaceflight. Elite Dangerous did it too. If Bethesda released Skyrim today, the game would get smashed with negative reviews because the standard has shifted from needing loading screens at every door to needing them basically never. Hell, Subnautica (another indie game), managed a densely packed open world RPG experience with basically zero hard loading screens. Using a teleporter is a loading screen, but they don't show up until the end of the game.
@@emarskineel Because you didn't have to fast travel. In Skyrim you couldn't fast travel to the next city, instead you had to walk there and while walking there you could run into interesting things. You would see ruins on the side of the road that led to new quests and interesting experiences. NPCs would walk up to you and say interesting things. If you found a Dragon Wall it could be guarded by some kind of interesting monster, or bandit, or dragon, or undead. It made you feel like you were really there and unexpected things could happen to you. In Starfield, you fast travel to a planet from a menu, nothing unexpected happens. Maybe you fight a few pirates. Then you fast travel to near your destination. Planet is procedurally generated so there's nothing interesting to find there outside of the one place you intended to go. If you go to a temple, there is no one guarding it at all. There is no exploration, no discovery, no sense of wonder.
@@emarskineel The issue is that it's not 2001 anymore. What was acceptable decades ago isn't always acceptable today. Other games manage this and people have experienced how much better the game is if there isn't a static image of a sweet roll every 15 to 30 seconds of gameplay, so they're no longer willing to shrug it off. This is like asking why people are mad if a car in 1980 can't drive backwards. The first Ford didn't go backwards and people were fine with it!
"The game uses procedural generation to produce thousands of unique planets!" Oh, so it's going to generate galaxies based on a wide selection of seeds for each individual playthrough? That's actually pretty cool. "No, we already generated them."
It actually wouldn't be a bad thing if its implementation was good. Imagine finding some amazing location and wanting to share it with your friend. Or perhaps beholding a YTer finding one and being able to reach it yourself. Static world would make all these findings shareable. And if you have over a 1000 of unique planets it's not a problem at all. But since the planets are pretty much vapid and POIs are boring the approach taken does not matter at all.
and among that already generated 1000s of planets, only stuff on 100 planets is truly handcrafted and others are straight up barren or have like 2 or 3 poi
It's a credit to the devs that a teen can mod their game, not an insult. The fact that said teen can make more content in a week than their entire team is the insult.
Yes. The teenagers have better ideas, and implement them better, AND fix their bugs, AND extend the engine....... wtf are bethesdas employees actually doing? Sitting around having diversity meetings probably.
To add: -three separate factions that have tried to kill each other (one’s still doing it currently) and they’re getting along now like there’s no problems -no real plot hook besides “let’s go discover the thing” -enemies are damage sponges -all named characters are immortal until the plot/quest says it’s ok to kill them -Certain perks are borderline mandatory and the story assumes you have them (boostpack perk) There’s more but I don’t want to make a wall of text
Some enemies are undeniably bullet sponges. Depending on difficulty they aren't so bad. But you get better loot on very hard and grinding for loot is one of the only things keeping some people hooked. So for most people bullet sponge enemies is a problem, and trying to dismiss it by saying 'headshots' isn't a good argument at all. You might as well say ' bro grind out all relevant crit skills and weapon skills, then craft top tier mods on a strong weapon with good perks on it and shoot enemies in the head and then you won't have a problem with bullet sponge enemies.' None of that changes the fact that some enemies are bullet sponges.
@@valenrn8657 I can see that you are in possession of a quality phone and or keyboard which allows you to skilfully post comments on TH-cam videos. Evidently the mark of a gentleman with true social skills and peerless mental faculties.
@@dmoonmaster1653 I bet he has a really good gaming chair too. Fallout 4 suffered this same problem. When you reach lvl 30ish and maxed out your damage buffs yet enemies health pools still climb exponentially. It's just garbage design, but this is also exactly what I expected from modern day Bethesda.
Hold on a second. Fast travel puts you OUTSIDE the waypoint, so you have to click another door to activate another loading screen? That's fucking hillarious.
Why nobody ever comment the most bizarre thing? When your character runs on a low gravity planet it's a very normal run, like it is earth's gravity. But when you jump, it's very light and slow, like in low gravity. THE GRAVITY IS ONLY LOW WHEN YOU JUMP!!!
Yes, this is something I noticed I think when an early mission sends you to Mars. I'm jumping 30 feet in the air because of weak gravity / no atmosphere, but my character still walks and runs like ir's Earth gravity. This might have been very difficult to program and animate, but it definitely takes away immersion. Physics in this game is very much Borderlands-esque.
I think it was so that ground travel which is already a chore because landing at an objective dumps you like 500km away isn't an even worst chore. I just completed the rangers faction final mission and my ship landed almost 1500km from the enemy base that HAS A FREAKING LANDING PAD!
Yeah it's atrocious. It's because they absolutely refuse to use a new game engine. You can't make realistic facial expressions on an engine that was made in 2005. Todd says "our team knows how to use creation engine" then maybe they should get a new team. Bethesda has good ideas, but they refuse to update their own internal way of developing games.
@@higglybiggly1174 its funny bc they dont even know how to use creation engine. they incorrectly coded the way the game loads so sometimes you just get shit performance and choppiness, meanwhile the community found and fixed the problem the day the game fully released because we ACTUALLY know how to use creation engine.
@@SM-oc4rc Yes it is true, since most updates didn't actually improve any aspect of an already ancient game, most mods depend on the version of the game so when they update it (such as the anniversary update)it changed the version of the game and in turn it really messed up alot of mods.
@@SM-oc4rc Iz true, some of the best content for Skyrim was from mods, but the moment SkyUI failed to work for just a bit, Skyrim became shit for just a bit.
i'd say that's a lock. can't think of anything else with remotely close to the same reception. in a different year, maybe ff16 or ac6. but not this year
@bottomlefto I still have high hopes for BG3 since the game delivered on so many levels. Not everyone can play a Mech game, and tears of the kingdom get boring after the same building, but BG3 gave people endless things to explore, and replayability was much higher.
My biggest issue with it so far is the writing. My companions lambast me for wanting to use wartime data because it’s dangerous, to lambasting me for not using that same data to create a bioweapon.
Bethesda have never have the ability to "write" anything. I don't know how Starfield starts out, but in every other game you are eitehr in prison, about to go to prison, going to be executed at prison and then "something" happens where only you survive and you are now chosen to do something that once you are done doing that thing...nothing happens and no one cares. They follow the 1990s Doom trope of the "lone survivor" storyline, which was extremely common for FPS games. Bethesda and its "writers" are still in 1994.
@@jesterbrown90 Ah yeah, starting a new game of elden ring is intimidating. Like damn I love the game and what they did but the game is huge in scope. I've been playing AC6 recently and man the mission style of gameplay is really comfy.
@@Odyssey636 After pre-ordering Cyberpunk I learned my lesson. Also the more lucrative a pre-order is, the more reason to stay away from it. Was very close to purchase D4, especially after enjoying the Beta testing. But decided to wait until Season 1. Then I decided to wait longer. A lot longer...
@@kyero8724 What? In Starfield you mean? Fuck no, I didn't buy that since it was made by Bethesda and they always release buggy half-finished products and then later rely upon the modding community to fix it up. Especially when using a 10-year old, half assed outdated engine like Creation Enfine. They didn't disappoint this time either. That's why I didn't buy it.
You definitely couldn’t say the game is impressive, I’d personally say (rating it based solely on the ‘technical’ stuff mostly mentioned in this vid), i’d say its decent at most. But for certain people like me, who loves ANY space game, i feel like you just kinda ignore all the shortcomings of it and enjoy it for what it is. Idk, i’ve played NMS, star citizen and elite dangerous, and starfield within 72hr of playing is my favourite game of all time. but thats just me.
Or weren't getting into. It had red flags planted all over it. Gameplay preview that stole some of its "hype moments" from FO4 gameplay previews was the last of such flags I needed to see to be assured that the game will suck in the usual Bugthesda way.
@sircharlz4512 See, I like this comment because you said things that were obvious to everybody and instead of being like. That's why I f****** hate it. You were honest and said and I like lot of people see all this stuff. This lack of hyper innovation and say that's a bad thing, but it's not. It's a good story, it made me feel emotions. It did its job. I'm 40 hours in and I'm nowhere near the end. I've already had some weird s*** happen and some more. S***, I am super excited to get in too. What more do I need out of a video game? At the end of the day, I play games to escape reality and. When you sit down and play Starfield. for an hour, suddenly, 3 to 6 hours have gone by. And I don't know a single other game that has done Rap for me. In the past year, the only other game that has done that for other people. Not me is balder's gate 3
See, it would be one thing if it was like a quick little "fade to black, fade back in" but no it's a whole-ass new cell being loaded, with a full-length loading screen each time
@@jamezbond45 the problem with all Bethesda games using this engine is, the engine itself runs in the 60fps cap and caps loadingscreens to 60fps, increasing it to 120 would make the game run at double speed. so no matter if im playing on a 13900k with a 4090 or 7700k with a 1070 and no matter if you go into a house or into open world, as long as u can hit 60fps the loading times will always remain the same. thats why there is an fps unlocker mod for FO4, which removes the fps caps on loading screens.
its because of the 2006 engine. they use the same engine like skyrim. and they relly on powerful gaming PCs to run their shitty game. the game is like a heavy mod for skyrim with 8k texture pack.
its crazy honestly that the one reviewer (IGN USA) who actually reviewed it the most fair gets the most backlash. And then people are wondering why reviewers are to scared to review games with low scores.
You can't blame game journalists they probably have the worst job in the entertainment industry if they praise every game they will be considered shills and if they dare and be honest about a game they will probably stop receiving review copies from publishers and will get harrased online by brain dead fanboys like that one ign reviewer that gave uncharted 4 "only" a 9/10 and the same thing is happening now with the ign employee who reviewed starfield.
I like it for the ship builder which has an obvious memory leak as its a battle against time before the entire game just freezes while building a ship that can occur immediately after opening it or an hour later forcing you to have to build the entire ship again. Also Starefield had me rolling.
Upgrade to 128 GB and the builder works ok. But then you try to place wires in the outpost builder and rage quit... Seriously, you have a mouse and want to target and place with the keyboard?? WTF were you thinking Bethesda??
What baffles me is that there are mods out there that prove that the Creation engine is perfectly capable of mimicking modern games. It’s just for some reason Bethesda never wants to hire any of the people who know how to use it that way.
@@bjornskivids That's not his point. His point is as bad (old) creation engine is, there is undeniable proof that it can be used in more creative and fun ways than is currently being done by Bethesda.
The Creation engine itself is fine. Just not for an expansive RPG in 2023. It's cell-based loading requiring constant loading screens because they have someone who puts 30 forks in a room is the killer.
@@bjornskivids Every engine is slowly built upon over time, and made to do all the fancy new things. The Creation Engine code base is perfectly capable of being brought up to modern standards and doing all this sh!t that everything else does.. And we know this because modders do it their bedrooms all the time. But it remains primitive because Bethesdas devs are incompetent, or lazy, or both. (read: diversity hires). It is not the engine itself that is the problem.
Bro, it's free labor. Why bother hiring people that you have to pay and make pensions for and all of that other corporate atuff when you can just have them do it for free? It's scuzzy, but it makes sense.
"10 guns in the entire game" - there are 12 different pistols alone. -> You cringe losers trying to validate your lonely lives by jumping on the hate train with equally pathetic people when you haven't played the game is CRAZY
@@KarmaMate It uses Creation Engine 2, which has been completely reworked for Starfield and Elder Scrolls 6. Yet these pathetic weirdos think it's the same engine from 2006. Just braindead losers, saying whatever helps them cope.
@@KarmaMatewhat to be sceptical about. Its no secret all bethesda games are on nearly 20 year old gamebryo engine that was designed for mmo's and they already pushed it to the limit with fallout 4, this engine just wont generate any better visuals because it can't handle them. Bethesda knows its the case thats why all their trailers are prerendered.
Mass Effect 1's planet mission time sink is unironically more engaging and less barren than Starfield's procedurally generated planets. And that said time sink almost made me drop ME1 as a whole.
@@VulturHS 1 account claims to have used 1000 bomb accounts. And there are like 1000 0 score reviews just going through different names of Pokemon. Sorted by negative it's obvious that most are just fake reviews or console war nonsense. The biggest reason for low scores is Loading screens lmao. Personally not a problem to me.
Just give it time. The shills will get tired of shilling, reality will set in, the people who paid for the special edition and can't get a refund will realize everything they were promised and din't get, and it'll go down to the 3 that it deserves. History repeats
@@sayLeotardbutsayitChinese or.. people will just continue to enjoy the game and you will keep ignoring the fact that people don't have to like all the same things as you. 10/10 GOTY STARFIELD (not 4 Sony) Masterpiece Oblivion in Space let's GO!
I remember the trailer drop and the spaceman started walking up the ladder, and people in the comments started freaking out “functional ladders confirmed!” That’s when I knew the community was dead
the funny thing is that ladders actually are somewhat hard to really nail them. in general this game made some impressive moves and goes to details like high peaks having stronger winds blowing out of the speakers... and then you cant use doors while the fucking scanner is open. or open your inventory. or open specific types of loot containers like weapon chests. good luck opening the "map" or tossing a grenade in that quick button gamble. procedural content is stale and has indeed the same layout, a concept that Diablo outdid... Diablo 1. in 1996.
@@scorcher117 that’s because it’s the same code that Notch made in his basement, apparently something hundreds of devs at Bethsda just figured out yesterday
I need to remind people that in Tears of the Kingdom, a game run on a 7 year-old console, that was released already outdated, you can jump from the sky islands to the surface and immediately into the depths without a single loading screen. A game where basically all of the open world is loading screen-free except for the shrines (which I assume made this way so you can't break them from the openworld).
He is comparing the ability of a company to fast load chunks of the world against another company doing the same. While one is able to do it on far lesser hardware. If you don't understand why this is a fair comparrison, I can only assume you think doing this in starfield would require loading all of the universe into memory. Which is dumb. Beyond dumb. Zelda loads more in a quarter mile radius than starfield has in its entire surface of empty rock. Maybe all the uneeded notepads and pens were too much for their engine
Because if you do compare you would find Bethesda to be a shite studio that isn't capable of incorporating a modern feature like that into the game! Thats why!@@melanp4698
I can tell you I got over the load screens and actually prefer them now. I'm tired of my playtime being artificially inflated because I went to grab a drink while waiting for my ship to arrive at a planet. Or farming the same material for hours. That's not a game. That's a job.
I was actually proud of myself I saw the trailers and it reminded me of the bullshit they fed us like no mans sky, cyberpunk, fallout 76 (before release) and probably a few other games i cant name rn. I saw the trap and didnt fall for it and I was rewarded with keeping my money.
No Man’s Sky at least had morals and continued to fix and complete the game without any added cost, unlike its contemporaries that will be bug ridden to their cores but YOU CAN BE DAMNED SURE their shops to buy stuff with irl money will always run perfectly.
All the promotional material was shifty, they were scared stiff to show us someone doing a normal mission, instead we get a bunch of jump cuts so they can hide their janky mess.
The part about the community not wanting bethesda to update the game is so true lol. Whenever CC was in full swing people had to downgrade their games or wait until modders could update their mods. IF they updated their mods. Not every modder did come back to update. FO4 eventually had a mod where it didnt matter what version of the game it was. Your mods could just work now. If only Bethesda did that themselves.
I haven't played Starfield, but I remember in Fallout 4 your character is slightly oversized relative to the environment, so I wouldn't doubt something similar is going on. If you were able to enter some of the indoor locations seamlessly, it would become immediately apparent how off the scaling is.
imagine that. fallout 4. a quest on blimp. you fast travel to the blimp - loading screen. you enter inside a blimp - loading screen. enter another area inside the blimp - loading screen. take your quest. go outside the area - loading screen. go outside the blimp itself - loading screen. fast travel to your quest location - loading screen. it's inside a building - loading screen, you need to go to the basement inside the building - loading screen. do the quest. get outside the basement - loading screen. get outside the building - loading screen. fast travel to the blimp - loading screen. enter blimp - loading screen. enter the area inside the blimp - loading screen. report to the quest giver. That's a real experience of bethesda games. count how many loading screens that was. also don't forget that load times are tide to frame rate, but if you uncap it to load faster it breaks the physics and ai of some NPCs unless you slap a mod that fixes it. and even after that load times will be around 20-40 seconds if your PC is good. on mid to low end devices it can take anywhere up to 2 minutes. hell the pop-ins are also a concern that can break the game. I had a character in full legendary gear that increases your movement speed. I sprinted along the river towards the Diamond City and suddenly find myself stuck in some stairs. I moved so fast that the cells were not loading terrain fast enough so literally was walking through walls before they were loading. the engine is so trash that they have the same bugs since fucking TES4: Oblivion. Expecting something good from Bethesda is stupid.
To be fair most games need loading to enter houses and stuff, the devs simply hide loading screens with long entrances or only let you go in certain interiors while a quest/condition is active
the fact you can't manually land or start actually made me sad. don't know why, but I've loved the thought of just being able to land wherever you want and having to do a landing maneuvre.
I'm 22 hours in and while I don't think it's awful, it does feel disappointing and I know opinions and all but these "10/10 masterpiece nothing wrong with it" reviews are smoking something hardcore
Have you seen joovs review? Dude straight up lied. He praised the space combat and said it controls great. His fanbase ate it up too. I think he said the exploration is great as well (it is not) he seriously couldn't come up with anything disappointing? The enemies are lame generic space raiders or gunners from fallout 4. I haven't touched the story much yet but outside of some great voice acting/dialogue it's hasn't been outstanding... At first when I saw the ign reviewer give it a 7, I figured he was an angry Sony fanboy, I'm not sure now...
They should have been real and said to themselves lets milk our antiquated ways again with TES6 and have Starfield with our real new engine that allows what all other real space games have. People would have like that better probably, despite it behind a reskinned Skyrim probably.
I can understand people who actually (somehow) enjoy this game but the people who blindly defend it like its a masterpiece are just wild to me Edit: don't try to argue with drelam, he'll just claim you're on an alt account all because you have an opinion that goes aginst his. He also doesn't seem to get simple things like notifications or timezones.
@@citizenvulpes4562 There's people out there that will treat you like garbage if you just say the game could have been better, honestly I loved many bethesda games and was one of my favourite companies but there's people who would rip your arm off and beat you with it if you say anything bad about Starfield.
How is that even surprising to you? Its Skyrim all over again. Skyrim for all that matters is a garbage game. Yea it can be fun, and you can mod it to hell and back but the game on its own is repetitive and generally speaking uninspired nonsense. The meme of "5 VAs for the whole game" while inaccurate speaks for itself. And yet people still defend it like its best thing since toast.
If Starfield was made by Blizzard, people would go crucify the entire studio. Rightfuly so. The fact that someone's trying to justify this gargabe is beyond me.
It's Bethesda cumbrain fanboys who are drooling for nude mods areadly. I know, 18 years ago I was one of them too, but I grew up and got laid in between. They didn't.
Bethesda has had the same formula for their RPGs since Oblivion. I love Oblivion with all my heart, but it's a stripped down version of what Morrowind was before it. But it's really what brought Bethesda to the mainstream, so they stuck with it. And Skyrim made it 10x worse. They haven't even changed engines since then. They have become such a dull and incredibly lazy company. It's sad
the fact that you can not fly over the surface of a planet or have anything to drive on the surface to explore it and even hit an invisible wall is a gamebreaker… that is not what i expect from an open world game…
I expected it and don't mind it. I'm underwhelmed with the game for other reasons, but these are technical hurdles that actually are hard to cross and I get that they focussed their efforts elsewhere.
@@beegyoshi1685 yes there are invisible walls on Skyrim what happens when you reach the edge of any side of the map lol and to substitute the horse you have a space ship and jet pack
@@rishyrish Yes, but those walls marked the end of the whole open world. There were no walls inside that world. You could travel from one side to the other seamlessly. You can't travel seamlessly between the split worlds in Starfield. They aren't one huge handcrafted open world. They are "tiles", split worlds that are not connected to each other and that can't be traversed seamlessly. Most of them are also pretty empty. I explored one such "tile" on one of the procedurally generated planets, and there were only 2 POI on it. 2. And the whole area was probably almost as big as Skyrims whole map. It was a barren rocky wasteland with just 2 POI on such a huge map. Exploration clearly wasn't the focus in this game. Those planets just exist for resource grinding. That's not why I play BGS games. Their games always were famous for exploration. Roam around the open world and explore one POI after the other. Totally forget about your current quest objective, because you just came across a cave. Or a camp. Or a ruin. And you want to explore it. And the one after it. And at some point hours have passed and you suddenly remember there was a quest you had to do. Thats not happening in Starfield.
@sidismo2903 if you don't like something why would you play it for 100 hours? Most people in the comment section never played the game and are just hating. Anonymous that wrote the post also never played the game. There's a ton of guns variety in the game, graphics look way better than previous bethesda games and it runs well on my 2080. They just wrote a bunch of dogsht so people that never played it can continue their echo chamber of toxicity
@@le4389 it's called reviewing the game. And in hindsight, people who have played that long give more accurate reviews since they're past the honeymoon phase.
If I didn't keep up with game releases and you told me Starfield was a Fallout 4 space mod that one random ass dude living in his mom's basement put together in 6 months, I'd believe you. I'm so worried for elder scrolls 6...
Yes, unbiased because he agrees with you. Asmon is a massive shill remember how much he defended Diablo? He is throwing this tantrum because he forgot to save in a bethesda game and wants to capitalize on the hate train same as always.
@@Odyssey636 Nah I like the game 40 hours in so far, I will be right just like always. Just like he will never play baldurs gate 3 again despite talking it up. Asmon just follows whatever will get him views same as always.
This is why i love 4chan. Raw, unhinged, real and honest people who are still free to express themselves. Wheter thats gore or AOC ai porn or this. Last bastion of freedom. Also, everything he said is true. Starefield is no man sky and fallout make love.
4chan a place of honesty? It is a place that is relentlessly dishonest about most things, as would be expected from a forum primarily known for trolling people. It's not more 'honest' just because it is unhinged and negative.
What year you think this is? 2015? 4chan is full of feds bro (i mean kinda, 2 dudes got arrested for saying "i would like to kill *some bullshit politician of florida* in minecraft"), the farms is the only free place on the internet now and is being raped by pedo troons lol.
No joke, I held off buying my 7900XTX because it came bundled with Starfield. I didn't even want the game on my computer for "free". I had to wait until AMD dropped the bundle before buying my new GPU.
Mass effect still remains the king of space games. Playing through mass effect legendary edition was probably the best single player experience of my life. Slightly ahead of witcher 3
@@flyhighty i believe people refer to the 3 originals in the legendary edition. Andromeda is abomination, its for mass effect whats 76 is to the fallout series.
"Community would rather they don't update their game" Too real. For some goddamn reason they released an update for Skyrim Special Edition like a year ago after there hadn't been an update in years that made tons of mods stop working.
Well some things on the list are 50% correct. For example there are areas where you seamlessly go into houses and out, but other areas where even the smallest zone needs a loading transition for NO REASON. It can be confusing at times, you'll notice these things as you play for extended periods of time. But if you put the game down fast, you will not see the mixed bag experience, it does get better at least.
I was amazed that people were already making mods for the game less than a week from its publication. And not just minor cosmetic mods, like changing some menu entries, but really major mods, like changing entire character models etc. Then someone told me the reason why modders were able to do such major modifications to the game that fast: The game is just using the same engine as previous Bethesda games, with very little modifications. That's how. On some aspects that might be a positive. From another point of view it just speaks of the sheer lack of innovation and development.
@StrobeFireStudios elite dangerous definitely doesn't do it perfectly and actually catches a lot of criticism from its fans. I absolutely expected a Bethesda game. I don't see how nobody else seemed to expect that lol. Especially when u hear how long this game has been in development, like you should've definitely known it won't be taking full advantage of modern technology and systems like seemless orbital transitions and things like that
The ease of which a person can make a mod is a quality of good code. Not saying the source code for this engine is bad, just that the worse code is, the harder it is to extend and adapt.
It's definitely a plus. I don't know why this was mentioned in this string of negatives. Most games are so obfuscated it's very difficult to make mods for them but that is one thing Bethesda should be praised for. Opening their game to modders. And holy shit their games need it.
@theinfidel8244 Spoken like someone who has no idea about writing software or proper practice. I'm a senior software engineer with 20 years in the profession and can confidently tell you that you're talking rubbish. Actual professionals avoid writing complex code, and parts of the dev pipeline actually involve reducing product complexity based on certain metrics to increase readability and reusability. Someone who tries to write complex code for the sake of writing complex code or see writing less code at the cost of understandability IS an amateur and they don't usually get their changes through PR, or stay on the team for very long for that matter, because people who have the mindset that good code is complex code are novices that have no place in a software house.
there's two sides of the isle here, guys. people who prefer a game to be easy to work with, code that easy to understand. that always comes at the cost of making the computer spend more processing power translating human-centric code into shit it understands, reducing game performance. the other side of the coin is games like Rollercoaster Tycoon 1 and 2, written on a codebase that's requires basically no "translation" for the computer and means whatever you program on it can run on the starchiest potato PCs out there, at the cost of requiring eldritch knowledge to actually make anything with.
I don't think so, starfield seems to be their most bug free game and it seems to be enjoyed by a big portion of gamers, unlike 76. So it's not really notable, just very recent so everyone is talking about it.
i didnt play starfield but i can see its mediocre especially without mods. - but BG3? sorry but i really have to disagree? only thing is in 2023 the hole mainstream plays BG3, mediocre ppl included...but the gameitself it really miles above this@@OilFreeFeathers
The stockholm syndrome of gamers today is crazy for sure. Read some of the reviews too. "Game is buggy. All I can do is explore dead surfaces. Also I recommend this game, 10/10 this year. Good bethesda game." Its bizzare and weird.
yeh. It tires me out. We get shit games, as cumsoomers keep pre-ordering games on memeberberries for 100 dollars and deny that the games are shit@@GenericUserName443
Also the outer worlds : 30 hours of content throughout the entire game. Starfield : 30 hours of main missions alone, nevermind the side missions and side content.
I was the biggest Bethesda fanboy...until FO4. I noticed they weren't even trying to upgrade their games. I became a very popular mod author with Skyrim. And I realized after the whole mods behind a paywall, that they're just relying on modders to clean up their shit. I refunded FO4, passed on 76. And again. Refunded Starefield. I WILL support game devs who evolve not just stay laxed and don't spend money on upgrading because they want a bigger boat or mansion. JMO 🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷🏼
@@ornlu_the_wolfIt's not great, it's not terrible, but with the hype prior it is disappointing, plus my 3080ti can't run it without issues on lowest settings.
@@miketurner2095 You sure about that? the only life in No Man Sky is a few space stations with static random gen aliens that all have the same lines too. Sooooooooooooooo
Bethesda made the Creation Engine in 2006 for Oblivion where it was actually ahead of it's time, but then they somehow fundamentally broke it when they tried to patch it for Skyrim, and they've been reusing the same fundementaly broken version of Creation Engine for every game since, INCLUDING trying to patch it for use in a MMO and we all saw how well that worked out.. I am certain they will use the SAME engine for Elder Scrolls 6 as well.
I honestly think they are stuck at this point. Either they need to rewrite it entirely and not just update parts. Or take something like Unreal and lose the mod-scene...
@@_Ekaros Well that's sort of the point though right? It's been enough time for them to build another Engine and try to future proof it to some degree. Technology of game engines has come SOO far in the last 15 years it's mind blowing! Continuously trying to patch a Engine from 2008 to bring it up to 2023 standards is kind of insane! I agree they cannot afford to lose the modding community, the modding community does a TON of leg work in fixing issues and patching their games, not to mention the longevity mods add to a game. Maybe they're working on a new Engine, but to me the fact that Starfield released as is suggests they determined that Creation Engine is sufficient for their modern games into the foreseeable future.
I saw some Starfield fans on Twitter shitting on a lighting mod because it deepened the grey blacks. They were saying it destroys the art direction lol. Like who the fuck didn't install lighting mods for Skyrim and Fallout?
I knew it was gonna be like this, most space genre games are, I'm here playing bg3 still and having a blast and wishing there was a DLC for the game I could pay for
I really appreciated this video, as a medium-term VRE80H holder. I know you commented on not many people paying attention to this, but it was very relevant for holders such as myself. After watching your thoughts, I willbuy more. I also remember your earl
Yes I agree. Ranjid told me yesterday that he made 100000$ a day through this amazing project. Thank you India for your revolution. I have a Ghandi statue in my house to honor you, dhanyavaad. I also eat Indian rice everyday to make Ghandi happy, now I get rewarded by my Indian friends thank you dhanyavaad.
Instead of spending 200$+ on D4 and Starfield EA i spent 60$ on BG3 that lasts me for more than a month and the rest on some nice fat fast food to accompany my actually enjoyable adventure. Best investment in my gaming life.
Bethesda's "Creation Engine" is way older than 2006, it goes even further back to the late 90's (1997) when it was called "NetImmerse". Yes the engine is well over 26 years old.
the interactions with npcs in 2023 - shoot them in the face, they curl up on the floor then get up and start telling you about their day! the immersion!!!!
Yeah I also refunded the game, played for a bit, saw how bad it was, was welcomed with 100 loading screens, the illusion of exploration and Horrible NPCs starings... refunded so hard didn't even blink, probably using the money on Space Marine when it comes out
100 loading screens- Lie Illusion of Exploration - Every game just about Enjoy Space Marine, the success rate of WH40K games is not great lol I'm sure you'll suck it up and pretend its good tho like a good fanboy.
@@kyero8724 loading screens are not a lie, you need like 6 screens to leave a building, enter your ship, and then go to another planet, there are loading screens in the middle of a fight, in the same fucking building, its sad as fuck, feels like a PlayStation 2 game
@@kyero8724 There are loading screens everywhere, remember when 10+ years ago games were so proud that you could change areas WITHOUT loading? Also good games hide the walls and corridors, if you can see the illusion, it's just a bad magic trick.
Funny thing about loading screens between buildings and stuff like that...no such loading screens in Morrowind. They're still segmented, yes, but you just instantly pop in the other side when you open a door.
Everone is talking about how bad sony is, which is true, but Microsoft showed their true colors with their first AAA release in years. The fact that they gave review codes only on handpicked outlets, lied through their teeth with the marketing, and pulled this crap with the early access shows you that once in the future Microsoft buys the whole industry the quality of the games will be just like the quality of current marvel movies.
Didn't Microsoft show their true colors years ago by buying game studios and running them into the ground and saying you couldn't share games because of some kind of drm? Like blizzard after activision being bad or rockstar half assing gta remakes and sloping out rdr1 for 50 bucks?
Microsoft got fucked the moment they bought Bethesda, its been decline since daggerfall. Worlds greatest mystery is how Bethesda sold turds for two decades without getting crucified by consumers.
people should never trust anything microsoft does, they've literally paid billions in fines at this point for the amount of lies and anticompetitive practices they've done.
This is complete nonsense. If that were true, they wouldn't have given IGN or Luke Steven's a review code. I love how we're making up lies about the marketing now. Which is it Pony, they did not market the game or they did?
I wonder if the intentionally dropped F76 in the state it was in, not only for the online store, but also to make starfield look less shit in comparison
I avoid open-world games in general by now. I know how hard it is to build a real open world and most developers either don't have the resources or the skills to do it right, which is why we're either left with an empty open world or a fake open world that is still empty somehow.
Skyrim is a good example. It's not bad. But investing to always bigger and bigger world is a mistake. Resources should have been used for livelier (and maybe bigger) cities, for memorable NPCs with good voice actors and for good memorable quests (there were some).
Wide as an ocean, shallow as a puddle.
The modern Bethesda experience.
That's clearly not true. It was Bethesda expirience since Oblivion.
@@DrNiradino At least Fallout 3, New Vegas, 4, and Skyrim were enjoyable.
@@Kagetora- For me, out of what you've mentioned, only NV was enjoyable, and mainly because it wasn't made by Bethesda. Main problem that they have, is that their writers follow the "Keep it simple, stupid" rule to writing. They intentionally make their stories dumb and shallow to appeal to "mainstream audience".
@@Kagetora- New Vegas is not a Bethesda game, it is a "what if Bethesda game but made by competent devs".
@@Kagetora-new Vegas wasn’t made by Bethesda and Skyrim was unplayable at launch especially on PlayStation so you only have 1 to compare fallout 4 on top of this Bethesda games are like wine they get better with age.
We can safely say Starfield has earned the Bethesda seal of quality.
Hope it wins Crap of the year
@@KogMawsTvShowhow nice of you
No truer words have been spoken lol
@@KogMawsTvShowunfortunately the game about that thing from lord of the rings is strong competitor for that
It's definitely a game.
Bethesda games regressed from "puddle deep ocean" to "its not even an ocean anymore, its 300 puddles separated by loading screens"
I don't get this. Every location of interest in every Bethesda game was segmented by loading screens. Every house/cave/town/city/dungeon etc. This game is no different but people are losing their minds over it.
You can go from a planet's surface to a specific location on another planet in another system in a single loading screen if you want to.
@@emarskineel
"Every location of interest in every Bethesda game was segmented by loading screens."
They were all connected by an outer world map you could explore in control of your character.
Starfield has no such thing, the tiles the game lets you explore are a minuscule part of the entire game, they are also mostly empty.
@@emarskineel Because No Man's Sky demonstrated that you COULD do seamless spaceflight. Elite Dangerous did it too. If Bethesda released Skyrim today, the game would get smashed with negative reviews because the standard has shifted from needing loading screens at every door to needing them basically never.
Hell, Subnautica (another indie game), managed a densely packed open world RPG experience with basically zero hard loading screens. Using a teleporter is a loading screen, but they don't show up until the end of the game.
@@emarskineel Because you didn't have to fast travel. In Skyrim you couldn't fast travel to the next city, instead you had to walk there and while walking there you could run into interesting things. You would see ruins on the side of the road that led to new quests and interesting experiences. NPCs would walk up to you and say interesting things. If you found a Dragon Wall it could be guarded by some kind of interesting monster, or bandit, or dragon, or undead. It made you feel like you were really there and unexpected things could happen to you. In Starfield, you fast travel to a planet from a menu, nothing unexpected happens. Maybe you fight a few pirates. Then you fast travel to near your destination. Planet is procedurally generated so there's nothing interesting to find there outside of the one place you intended to go. If you go to a temple, there is no one guarding it at all. There is no exploration, no discovery, no sense of wonder.
@@emarskineel The issue is that it's not 2001 anymore. What was acceptable decades ago isn't always acceptable today. Other games manage this and people have experienced how much better the game is if there isn't a static image of a sweet roll every 15 to 30 seconds of gameplay, so they're no longer willing to shrug it off.
This is like asking why people are mad if a car in 1980 can't drive backwards. The first Ford didn't go backwards and people were fine with it!
"The game uses procedural generation to produce thousands of unique planets!"
Oh, so it's going to generate galaxies based on a wide selection of seeds for each individual playthrough?
That's actually pretty cool.
"No, we already generated them."
Bethesda moment
It actually wouldn't be a bad thing if its implementation was good. Imagine finding some amazing location and wanting to share it with your friend. Or perhaps beholding a YTer finding one and being able to reach it yourself. Static world would make all these findings shareable. And if you have over a 1000 of unique planets it's not a problem at all. But since the planets are pretty much vapid and POIs are boring the approach taken does not matter at all.
and among that already generated 1000s of planets, only stuff on 100 planets is truly handcrafted and others are straight up barren or have like 2 or 3 poi
@@datbunneh3671oh that exists. Its no mans sky
@@kevinaosei Funny thing, NMS was even more empty than Starfield at release. But one is developed by an indie studio, and another by big ass company.
People have to understand that Bethesda doesn't sell games, they sell dev kits so modders can make a game.
Then removes the mod, steals it and takes all the money associated with it.
lol sure pal
Enderal comes to mind
lol
@@Skycube100Hey Fan girl, nobody wants your input.
The adults are talking.
It's a credit to the devs that a teen can mod their game, not an insult. The fact that said teen can make more content in a week than their entire team is the insult.
Yes. The teenagers have better ideas, and implement them better, AND fix their bugs, AND extend the engine....... wtf are bethesdas employees actually doing? Sitting around having diversity meetings probably.
the devs that made the engine 10-20 years ago.... that probably dont work there anymore...
@@insiainutorrt259 I don't think I knew it was the same engine when I wrote that.
@@stevencurtis7157 fallout, skyrim, starfield, its all the same, just new paint
@@arohk4415 I wouldn't know, I don't play them.
Bethesda's new motto "Don't worry, the mod community will fix it."
New? It's been that way since Oblivion.
Yeah but most mods cost performance and the game is already running poorly on good PC's.
@@icyknightmare4592oblivion actually has a crap ton in its vanilla compared to the others... by others, I mean the games that came after
I feel like that’s the motto with a lot of game companies or at least the ones with open community access.
Exactly one of the best and honest comments here.
To add:
-three separate factions that have tried to kill each other (one’s still doing it currently) and they’re getting along now like there’s no problems
-no real plot hook besides “let’s go discover the thing”
-enemies are damage sponges
-all named characters are immortal until the plot/quest says it’s ok to kill them
-Certain perks are borderline mandatory and the story assumes you have them (boostpack perk)
There’s more but I don’t want to make a wall of text
-enemies are damage sponges
FALSE. There are headshots.
Some enemies are undeniably bullet sponges. Depending on difficulty they aren't so bad. But you get better loot on very hard and grinding for loot is one of the only things keeping some people hooked. So for most people bullet sponge enemies is a problem, and trying to dismiss it by saying 'headshots' isn't a good argument at all. You might as well say ' bro grind out all relevant crit skills and weapon skills, then craft top tier mods on a strong weapon with good perks on it and shoot enemies in the head and then you won't have a problem with bullet sponge enemies.' None of that changes the fact that some enemies are bullet sponges.
@@dmoonmaster1653 Headshots require a gamer's skills, good weapons, and a good gaming mouse.
@@valenrn8657 I can see that you are in possession of a quality phone and or keyboard which allows you to skilfully post comments on TH-cam videos. Evidently the mark of a gentleman with true social skills and peerless mental faculties.
@@dmoonmaster1653 I bet he has a really good gaming chair too. Fallout 4 suffered this same problem. When you reach lvl 30ish and maxed out your damage buffs yet enemies health pools still climb exponentially. It's just garbage design, but this is also exactly what I expected from modern day Bethesda.
Can confirm starefield is the Bethesda game of all time
Its one of the bethesda games allright
Mass effect legendary edition will never be beaten for a space experience.
It's SUPPOSED to be buggy and broken, that's HALF THE FUN
Indeed
@@Truthseeker-iz3djall I want to do is replay mass effect again now, and I think I will. This game is just alright, absolutely zero innovation.
Hold on a second.
Fast travel puts you OUTSIDE the waypoint, so you have to click another door to activate another loading screen?
That's fucking hillarious.
pathetic sufices better
Just like D4's NM dungs innit 😂
They really did make a Skyrim on space
That’s how it’s always been since the 360 era.
@@masterinsatiable6656let these dweebs continue to feel good about their logic a bit longer
Why nobody ever comment the most bizarre thing?
When your character runs on a low gravity planet it's a very normal run, like it is earth's gravity. But when you jump, it's very light and slow, like in low gravity. THE GRAVITY IS ONLY LOW WHEN YOU JUMP!!!
Yes, this is something I noticed I think when an early mission sends you to Mars. I'm jumping 30 feet in the air because of weak gravity / no atmosphere, but my character still walks and runs like ir's Earth gravity.
This might have been very difficult to program and animate, but it definitely takes away immersion. Physics in this game is very much Borderlands-esque.
@@thevoxdeus you turn off your grav boots when you jump!
@@jamesbyrd3740 oh, grav boots. Got it!
@@thevoxdeus Borderlands Pre-sequel managed to figure it out
I think it was so that ground travel which is already a chore because landing at an objective dumps you like 500km away isn't an even worst chore.
I just completed the rangers faction final mission and my ship landed almost 1500km from the enemy base that HAS A FREAKING LANDING PAD!
Finally someone with an audience that says "no facial expressions" as part of the review for a game promised to be 'realistic' and 'immersive'.
it's honestly unbelievable that they don't have them
After playing cyberpunk 2077 and BG3. The Facial expressions in Starfield look terrible!
Yeah it's atrocious. It's because they absolutely refuse to use a new game engine. You can't make realistic facial expressions on an engine that was made in 2005. Todd says "our team knows how to use creation engine" then maybe they should get a new team. Bethesda has good ideas, but they refuse to update their own internal way of developing games.
Yet what he said is a lie.
@@higglybiggly1174 its funny bc they dont even know how to use creation engine. they incorrectly coded the way the game loads so sometimes you just get shit performance and choppiness, meanwhile the community found and fixed the problem the day the game fully released because we ACTUALLY know how to use creation engine.
Why make a finished game when you know your modding community will fix the game for you? This is truly the game of all time.
It is true that the community actually dreads updates to Bethesda games. They will fix 5 bugs, create 50 more and at the same time break ALL mods.
I was thinking that the entire time playing. "Oh they just left that for modders to fix..."
I'd say Bethesda is the Gaming Corporation of Sloth, but Valve has that title on lock.
@@SM-oc4rc Yes it is true, since most updates didn't actually improve any aspect of an already ancient game, most mods depend on the version of the game so when they update it (such as the anniversary update)it changed the version of the game and in turn it really messed up alot of mods.
@@SM-oc4rc Iz true, some of the best content for Skyrim was from mods, but the moment SkyUI failed to work for just a bit, Skyrim became shit for just a bit.
Thank you, Bethesda, for increasing Baldur's Gate 3 chances of winning that GOTY even more. Really, thank you.
i'd say that's a lock. can't think of anything else with remotely close to the same reception. in a different year, maybe ff16 or ac6. but not this year
@@cellamuert There's also TOTK
@@athormaximoff4634 I was going to say that.
it still has to fight armored core 6 and zelda plus whatever dark horse contender that may appear these next few months, you never know.
@bottomlefto I still have high hopes for BG3 since the game delivered on so many levels. Not everyone can play a Mech game, and tears of the kingdom get boring after the same building, but BG3 gave people endless things to explore, and replayability was much higher.
This game setting is so sterile and safe. None of the gruff harshness that makes it feel like real life.
@@ni9274Someone used the internal neuroamp on him.
@@ni9274 Correct.
Playing this game is a harsh enough punishment for just about everyone.
The murderous space pirates respect pronouns. That’s not harsh.
it's also all the same. everything looks the same
This game is as edgy as Microsoft's HR department.
My biggest issue with it so far is the writing. My companions lambast me for wanting to use wartime data because it’s dangerous, to lambasting me for not using that same data to create a bioweapon.
Emil is the writer I presume? What a talentless goober that guy is.
And the constant twitter-esque dialogue options.
All the passive aggressive snark. Written by 20-something without any clue, imagination, or life experience
Bethesda have never have the ability to "write" anything. I don't know how Starfield starts out, but in every other game you are eitehr in prison, about to go to prison, going to be executed at prison and then "something" happens where only you survive and you are now chosen to do something that once you are done doing that thing...nothing happens and no one cares. They follow the 1990s Doom trope of the "lone survivor" storyline, which was extremely common for FPS games. Bethesda and its "writers" are still in 1994.
@@vjmtz Starfield is even a step back from that.
The more time goes by, the happier i am that i stopped trusting AAA companies to make good games.
imagine trusting any company to begin with lerl
Aw what games have you enjoyed recently?
@kyero8724 Baldur's Gate 3 is the only new one so far. Elden Ring was amazing, but the size keeps me from replaying.
@@jesterbrown90 Ah yeah, starting a new game of elden ring is intimidating. Like damn I love the game and what they did but the game is huge in scope.
I've been playing AC6 recently and man the mission style of gameplay is really comfy.
are you guys really taking this troll post seriously?
I didn't purchase D4, or Starfield on launch for fear of this exact situation.
Hands down, the best money I never spent.
Damn, a video game enthusiast who isn't a consoomer who pre-orders firsts and asks questions later.
@@Odyssey636 After pre-ordering Cyberpunk I learned my lesson.
Also the more lucrative a pre-order is, the more reason to stay away from it.
Was very close to purchase D4, especially after enjoying the Beta testing. But decided to wait until Season 1. Then I decided to wait longer. A lot longer...
Because you listened to someone point out minor bitching opinions and lies? Just like the lie about no facial animations.
@@kyero8724 What? In Starfield you mean?
Fuck no, I didn't buy that since it was made by Bethesda and they always release buggy half-finished products and then later rely upon the modding community to fix it up.
Especially when using a 10-year old, half assed outdated engine like Creation Enfine. They didn't disappoint this time either.
That's why I didn't buy it.
@@kyero8724 Lies? Todd would know about lies.
Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies.
The game had so much hype that many people will try hard to make it look like its actually impressive.
You definitely couldn’t say the game is impressive, I’d personally say (rating it based solely on the ‘technical’ stuff mostly mentioned in this vid), i’d say its decent at most.
But for certain people like me, who loves ANY space game, i feel like you just kinda ignore all the shortcomings of it and enjoy it for what it is.
Idk, i’ve played NMS, star citizen and elite dangerous, and starfield within 72hr of playing is my favourite game of all time. but thats just me.
@@hmishfiddy Nothing wrong in enjoying a game.
Or weren't getting into. It had red flags planted all over it. Gameplay preview that stole some of its "hype moments" from FO4 gameplay previews was the last of such flags I needed to see to be assured that the game will suck in the usual Bugthesda way.
@sircharlz4512 See, I like this comment because you said things that were obvious to everybody and instead of being like. That's why I f****** hate it. You were honest and said and I like lot of people see all this stuff. This lack of hyper innovation and say that's a bad thing, but it's not. It's a good story, it made me feel emotions. It did its job. I'm 40 hours in and I'm nowhere near the end. I've already had some weird s*** happen and some more. S***, I am super excited to get in too. What more do I need out of a video game? At the end of the day, I play games to escape reality and. When you sit down and play Starfield. for an hour, suddenly, 3 to 6 hours have gone by. And I don't know a single other game that has done Rap for me. In the past year, the only other game that has done that for other people. Not me is balder's gate 3
The game is very impressive. Without loading screens it’s easily goty
the loading screens between interior and exterior is actually like a huge point, wtf decade are we living in?
this is why people complain that they never create a new engine.
See, it would be one thing if it was like a quick little "fade to black, fade back in" but no it's a whole-ass new cell being loaded, with a full-length loading screen each time
@@jamezbond45 the problem with all Bethesda games using this engine is, the engine itself runs in the 60fps cap and caps loadingscreens to 60fps, increasing it to 120 would make the game run at double speed. so no matter if im playing on a 13900k with a 4090 or 7700k with a 1070 and no matter if you go into a house or into open world, as long as u can hit 60fps the loading times will always remain the same. thats why there is an fps unlocker mod for FO4, which removes the fps caps on loading screens.
its because of the 2006 engine. they use the same engine like skyrim. and they relly on powerful gaming PCs to run their shitty game. the game is like a heavy mod for skyrim with 8k texture pack.
This is "The Standard", which was so fiercely defended by the developers on Twitter during the launch of BG3.
if video game "journalists," were restaurant critics they would rate a can of wet cat food 7.5/10
its crazy honestly that the one reviewer (IGN USA) who actually reviewed it the most fair gets the most backlash.
And then people are wondering why reviewers are to scared to review games with low scores.
@@jeltevl8868 a real "they hated him because he spoke the truth" moment
That's exactly what restaurant critics do.
You can't blame game journalists they probably have the worst job in the entertainment industry if they praise every game they will be considered shills and if they dare and be honest about a game they will probably stop receiving review copies from publishers and will get harrased online by brain dead fanboys like that one ign reviewer that gave uncharted 4 "only" a 9/10 and the same thing is happening now with the ign employee who reviewed starfield.
@@Dr.Yakub22 good argument for why games journalism shouldn't exist
If this had 7 years of development under its belt then i can imagine what ES6 will be like
But remember how people criticized BG3 for having a long development time so ofc it would be a good game
@@Rofel_Wodringlong development time doesn’t mean 100% guarantee of good games anymore, cyberpunk 2077 and this are good examples.
it wasnt actually 7 years
@@Rofel_Wodringthey recently begun with ES6 they just present it before cuz they didnt want to end like Blizzcon
Overly long development time is a sign of trouble, not quality. Final Fantasy 15 comes to mind
I like it for the ship builder which has an obvious memory leak as its a battle against time before the entire game just freezes while building a ship that can occur immediately after opening it or an hour later forcing you to have to build the entire ship again.
Also Starefield had me rolling.
Rewrite it in (safe) Rust.
Upgrade to 128 GB and the builder works ok.
But then you try to place wires in the outpost builder and rage quit...
Seriously, you have a mouse and want to target and place with the keyboard?? WTF were you thinking Bethesda??
What baffles me is that there are mods out there that prove that the Creation engine is perfectly capable of mimicking modern games. It’s just for some reason Bethesda never wants to hire any of the people who know how to use it that way.
The Creation engine is awful. No matter how good the modder is, it's still a Creation-engine game.
@@bjornskivids That's not his point. His point is as bad (old) creation engine is, there is undeniable proof that it can be used in more creative and fun ways than is currently being done by Bethesda.
The Creation engine itself is fine. Just not for an expansive RPG in 2023. It's cell-based loading requiring constant loading screens because they have someone who puts 30 forks in a room is the killer.
@@bjornskivids Every engine is slowly built upon over time, and made to do all the fancy new things. The Creation Engine code base is perfectly capable of being brought up to modern standards and doing all this sh!t that everything else does.. And we know this because modders do it their bedrooms all the time. But it remains primitive because Bethesdas devs are incompetent, or lazy, or both. (read: diversity hires). It is not the engine itself that is the problem.
Bro, it's free labor. Why bother hiring people that you have to pay and make pensions for and all of that other corporate atuff when you can just have them do it for free? It's scuzzy, but it makes sense.
His review was brutally honest. Not a single lie was told.
Not a single lie was todd
"10 guns in the entire game" - there are 12 different pistols alone.
-> You cringe losers trying to validate your lonely lives by jumping on the hate train with equally pathetic people when you haven't played the game is CRAZY
Im skeptical about the game engine one cause literally no one has a clue how they are typically maintained usually
@@KarmaMate It uses Creation Engine 2, which has been completely reworked for Starfield and Elder Scrolls 6. Yet these pathetic weirdos think it's the same engine from 2006. Just braindead losers, saying whatever helps them cope.
@@KarmaMatewhat to be sceptical about. Its no secret all bethesda games are on nearly 20 year old gamebryo engine that was designed for mmo's and they already pushed it to the limit with fallout 4, this engine just wont generate any better visuals because it can't handle them. Bethesda knows its the case thats why all their trailers are prerendered.
Mass Effect 1's planet mission time sink is unironically more engaging and less barren than Starfield's procedurally generated planets.
And that said time sink almost made me drop ME1 as a whole.
Yeah, I mean at least Mass effect gave you the Mako to drive around in.
Mass Effect 1 is a better game than Starfield straight up.
@@RedEverything yes, in absolutely any concievable facet.
@@RedEverythingabsolutely. I still remember every character from ME1...I couldn't name a single character from soyfield
This game went really quickly from masterpiece game of the year, to 7/10 isn't a bad review score.
It has an 84 on Metacritic even after being review bombed by the pony brigade 😂
@@VulturHS 1 account claims to have used 1000 bomb accounts. And there are like 1000 0 score reviews just going through different names of Pokemon. Sorted by negative it's obvious that most are just fake reviews or console war nonsense. The biggest reason for low scores is Loading screens lmao. Personally not a problem to me.
@@infernaldaedra keep crying and buying overpriced garbage games... you are the problem with the industry, same shit with D4
Just give it time. The shills will get tired of shilling, reality will set in, the people who paid for the special edition and can't get a refund will realize everything they were promised and din't get, and it'll go down to the 3 that it deserves. History repeats
@@sayLeotardbutsayitChinese or.. people will just continue to enjoy the game and you will keep ignoring the fact that people don't have to like all the same things as you. 10/10 GOTY STARFIELD (not 4 Sony) Masterpiece Oblivion in Space let's GO!
I remember the trailer drop and the spaceman started walking up the ladder, and people in the comments started freaking out “functional ladders confirmed!”
That’s when I knew the community was dead
*braindead
the funny thing is that ladders actually are somewhat hard to really nail them. in general this game made some impressive moves and goes to details like high peaks having stronger winds blowing out of the speakers... and then you cant use doors while the fucking scanner is open. or open your inventory. or open specific types of loot containers like weapon chests. good luck opening the "map" or tossing a grenade in that quick button gamble. procedural content is stale and has indeed the same layout, a concept that Diablo outdid... Diablo 1. in 1996.
@@HiUnidentified holy fuck man, it’s just a ladder, if Minecraft could figure it out back in 2008 it’s not hard.
@@Shiggy_minecraft ladders are pretty awkward/clunky to be fair.
@@scorcher117 that’s because it’s the same code that Notch made in his basement, apparently something hundreds of devs at Bethsda just figured out yesterday
I need to remind people that in Tears of the Kingdom, a game run on a 7 year-old console, that was released already outdated, you can jump from the sky islands to the surface and immediately into the depths without a single loading screen.
A game where basically all of the open world is loading screen-free except for the shrines (which I assume made this way so you can't break them from the openworld).
Comparing that to this is stupid. Rethink your logic here.
@@thedurtylemur2282Why?
He is comparing the ability of a company to fast load chunks of the world against another company doing the same. While one is able to do it on far lesser hardware. If you don't understand why this is a fair comparrison, I can only assume you think doing this in starfield would require loading all of the universe into memory. Which is dumb. Beyond dumb. Zelda loads more in a quarter mile radius than starfield has in its entire surface of empty rock. Maybe all the uneeded notepads and pens were too much for their engine
Because if you do compare you would find Bethesda to be a shite studio that isn't capable of incorporating a modern feature like that into the game! Thats why!@@melanp4698
I can tell you I got over the load screens and actually prefer them now. I'm tired of my playtime being artificially inflated because I went to grab a drink while waiting for my ship to arrive at a planet. Or farming the same material for hours. That's not a game. That's a job.
I was actually proud of myself I saw the trailers and it reminded me of the bullshit they fed us like no mans sky, cyberpunk, fallout 76 (before release) and probably a few other games i cant name rn. I saw the trap and didnt fall for it and I was rewarded with keeping my money.
Don't pirate it either, it's actually not free and it costs you the price of being confused how games are shit these days.
@@davidmoak1219 It costs way more: It costs your time. You can't get your time back. Do something that is actually enjoyable.
At least nms is good now tho. And better than this crap!
No Man’s Sky at least had morals and continued to fix and complete the game without any added cost, unlike its contemporaries that will be bug ridden to their cores but YOU CAN BE DAMNED SURE their shops to buy stuff with irl money will always run perfectly.
All the promotional material was shifty, they were scared stiff to show us someone doing a normal mission, instead we get a bunch of jump cuts so they can hide their janky mess.
The part about the community not wanting bethesda to update the game is so true lol. Whenever CC was in full swing people had to downgrade their games or wait until modders could update their mods.
IF they updated their mods. Not every modder did come back to update.
FO4 eventually had a mod where it didnt matter what version of the game it was. Your mods could just work now. If only Bethesda did that themselves.
it's sad as Fallout 4 the exact same issue, update breaking all the mods for no reason
Not gonna lie, the line "Can't seamesly enter a house in 2023" was eye opening for me about how fucking outdated their games are.
I haven't played Starfield, but I remember in Fallout 4 your character is slightly oversized relative to the environment, so I wouldn't doubt something similar is going on. If you were able to enter some of the indoor locations seamlessly, it would become immediately apparent how off the scaling is.
I mean we're talking about a studio that made Fallout 76, a game where you ran faster than other players if you had more FPS.
imagine that. fallout 4. a quest on blimp. you fast travel to the blimp - loading screen. you enter inside a blimp - loading screen. enter another area inside the blimp - loading screen. take your quest. go outside the area - loading screen. go outside the blimp itself - loading screen. fast travel to your quest location - loading screen. it's inside a building - loading screen, you need to go to the basement inside the building - loading screen. do the quest. get outside the basement - loading screen. get outside the building - loading screen. fast travel to the blimp - loading screen. enter blimp - loading screen. enter the area inside the blimp - loading screen. report to the quest giver.
That's a real experience of bethesda games. count how many loading screens that was. also don't forget that load times are tide to frame rate, but if you uncap it to load faster it breaks the physics and ai of some NPCs unless you slap a mod that fixes it. and even after that load times will be around 20-40 seconds if your PC is good. on mid to low end devices it can take anywhere up to 2 minutes. hell the pop-ins are also a concern that can break the game. I had a character in full legendary gear that increases your movement speed. I sprinted along the river towards the Diamond City and suddenly find myself stuck in some stairs. I moved so fast that the cells were not loading terrain fast enough so literally was walking through walls before they were loading.
the engine is so trash that they have the same bugs since fucking TES4: Oblivion. Expecting something good from Bethesda is stupid.
Name a single game that you can do that in. Rdr was one of the best games ever made and you can't do that. Unrealistic ass expectations.
To be fair most games need loading to enter houses and stuff, the devs simply hide loading screens with long entrances or only let you go in certain interiors while a quest/condition is active
the fact you can't manually land or start actually made me sad. don't know why, but I've loved the thought of just being able to land wherever you want and having to do a landing maneuvre.
Play no man's sky if you haven't already. Or armored core 6 honestly.
I have played NMS hundreds of hours after that one update dropped years ago. I enjoyed it a lot as well. @@thedarklordx
Let's wait for Star Wars Outlaws
I guess it is for the best. Imagine the jank. Ship controls are bad as is
I mean there are cheaper games that let you do that. Elite Dangerous comes to mind.
I'm 22 hours in and while I don't think it's awful, it does feel disappointing and I know opinions and all but these "10/10 masterpiece nothing wrong with it" reviews are smoking something hardcore
No they are smoking an expensive sigar from todd
>feels disappointing
>10/10
You are worse than IGN.
Have you seen joovs review? Dude straight up lied. He praised the space combat and said it controls great. His fanbase ate it up too.
I think he said the exploration is great as well (it is not) he seriously couldn't come up with anything disappointing? The enemies are lame generic space raiders or gunners from fallout 4.
I haven't touched the story much yet but outside of some great voice acting/dialogue it's hasn't been outstanding... At first when I saw the ign reviewer give it a 7, I figured he was an angry Sony fanboy, I'm not sure now...
@@OilFreeFeathers I guess I should've clarified, I mean the "10/10 masterpiece nothing wrong" reviews. I'm not actually calling this game 10/10.
@@OilFreeFeathersthe 10/10 that he meant is for the reviewers other than him
Bethesda has been milking the same increasingly antiquated game blueprint for the last 20 years, and its finally caught up with them.
They should have been real and said to themselves lets milk our antiquated ways again with TES6 and have Starfield with our real new engine that allows what all other real space games have. People would have like that better probably, despite it behind a reskinned Skyrim probably.
I can understand people who actually (somehow) enjoy this game but the people who blindly defend it like its a masterpiece are just wild to me
Edit: don't try to argue with drelam, he'll just claim you're on an alt account all because you have an opinion that goes aginst his. He also doesn't seem to get simple things like notifications or timezones.
Yes, there's people treating it like it's the new holy Grail for Bethesda.
@@citizenvulpes4562 There's people out there that will treat you like garbage if you just say the game could have been better, honestly I loved many bethesda games and was one of my favourite companies but there's people who would rip your arm off and beat you with it if you say anything bad about Starfield.
How is that even surprising to you? Its Skyrim all over again. Skyrim for all that matters is a garbage game. Yea it can be fun, and you can mod it to hell and back but the game on its own is repetitive and generally speaking uninspired nonsense. The meme of "5 VAs for the whole game" while inaccurate speaks for itself. And yet people still defend it like its best thing since toast.
@@GikamesShadowcause they're content starved
@@citizenvulpes4562For Bethesda it is the holy grail, lol. For games in general, fuck no, far better stuff out there in 2023
If Starfield was made by Blizzard, people would go crucify the entire studio. Rightfuly so. The fact that someone's trying to justify this gargabe is beyond me.
Modern Blizzard couldn't make Starfield
It's Bethesda cumbrain fanboys who are drooling for nude mods areadly. I know, 18 years ago I was one of them too, but I grew up and got laid in between. They didn't.
xbox fan bois want something to dangle on ps fan bois heads
Modern blizzard would put in lootboxes,battlepass and other mtx.
bUt iTs a bEtHeSdA GaMe wHaT DiD U ExPeCt hAtEr. UnReAl eXpEcTaTiOnS. /s
Bethesda has had the same formula for their RPGs since Oblivion. I love Oblivion with all my heart, but it's a stripped down version of what Morrowind was before it. But it's really what brought Bethesda to the mainstream, so they stuck with it. And Skyrim made it 10x worse. They haven't even changed engines since then. They have become such a dull and incredibly lazy company. It's sad
Yeah bring back competitive racism from morrowwind bethseda you bunch of n'wahs
Dull and lazy is a great way to describe modern day bethesda
@@dankmemes8254 What the fuck did you just say about me you little s'wit?
@@dankmemes8254 That's when the universe had soul.
And just imagine that demon souls was going to be similar to oblivion, now we have elden ring
The engine is actually from 1997... it was originally called the Gamebryo engine and it was free...
the fact that you can not fly over the surface of a planet or have anything to drive on the surface to explore it and even hit an invisible wall is a gamebreaker…
that is not what i expect from an open world game…
Skyrim and fallout both had the same thing on the map but I guess
I expected it and don't mind it. I'm underwhelmed with the game for other reasons, but these are technical hurdles that actually are hard to cross and I get that they focussed their efforts elsewhere.
@@rishyrishthere were no invisible walls and you had a horse to travel in skyrim haven't played fallout can't comment on that
@@beegyoshi1685 yes there are invisible walls on Skyrim what happens when you reach the edge of any side of the map lol and to substitute the horse you have a space ship and jet pack
@@rishyrish Yes, but those walls marked the end of the whole open world. There were no walls inside that world. You could travel from one side to the other seamlessly. You can't travel seamlessly between the split worlds in Starfield. They aren't one huge handcrafted open world. They are "tiles", split worlds that are not connected to each other and that can't be traversed seamlessly. Most of them are also pretty empty. I explored one such "tile" on one of the procedurally generated planets, and there were only 2 POI on it. 2. And the whole area was probably almost as big as Skyrims whole map. It was a barren rocky wasteland with just 2 POI on such a huge map. Exploration clearly wasn't the focus in this game. Those planets just exist for resource grinding. That's not why I play BGS games. Their games always were famous for exploration. Roam around the open world and explore one POI after the other. Totally forget about your current quest objective, because you just came across a cave. Or a camp. Or a ruin. And you want to explore it. And the one after it. And at some point hours have passed and you suddenly remember there was a quest you had to do. Thats not happening in Starfield.
after playing the game for 100 hours I am sad to say that it is pretty much accurate.
It certainly is possible
Nice try lol
@@ni9274who died and made you the expert on what's possible or not? Bethesda ain't paying you no matter how you defend their garbage lol.
@sidismo2903 if you don't like something why would you play it for 100 hours? Most people in the comment section never played the game and are just hating. Anonymous that wrote the post also never played the game. There's a ton of guns variety in the game, graphics look way better than previous bethesda games and it runs well on my 2080. They just wrote a bunch of dogsht so people that never played it can continue their echo chamber of toxicity
@@le4389 it's called reviewing the game. And in hindsight, people who have played that long give more accurate reviews since they're past the honeymoon phase.
I pirated this game and still feel ripped off
🤣
💀
You have been ripped off. You lost your time playing this.
You should ask for refund
You should ask bgs to pay your internet and electric bill 😁
The only wrong statement here is that creation engine was outdated 10 years ago. It was actually already outdated 12 years ago.
If I didn't keep up with game releases and you told me Starfield was a Fallout 4 space mod that one random ass dude living in his mom's basement put together in 6 months, I'd believe you.
I'm so worried for elder scrolls 6...
One of the few unbiased and completely honest reviews!
Keep up that damage control buddy, you're doing great.
Yes, unbiased because he agrees with you. Asmon is a massive shill remember how much he defended Diablo? He is throwing this tantrum because he forgot to save in a bethesda game and wants to capitalize on the hate train same as always.
@@Odyssey636 Nah I like the game 40 hours in so far, I will be right just like always. Just like he will never play baldurs gate 3 again despite talking it up. Asmon just follows whatever will get him views same as always.
Negative = unbiased to most of you folk
Keep huffing that copium that starfield is amazing
People are bunch of haters, it doesn't matter if i'm still having fun.
I have 0 hours in Starfield, and i'm still having fun playing BG3.
That distinct Bethesda quality we were all expecting.
*Thank you Larian Studios for Baldur's Gate 3.* ❤
Best game this year
Amd From Software for Armored Core 6, both are my favorite games of the year.
This is why i love 4chan. Raw, unhinged, real and honest people who are still free to express themselves. Wheter thats gore or AOC ai porn or this. Last bastion of freedom.
Also, everything he said is true. Starefield is no man sky and fallout make love.
4chan is a mixed bag of truth, lies, and degeneracy.
4chan a place of honesty? It is a place that is relentlessly dishonest about most things, as would be expected from a forum primarily known for trolling people. It's not more 'honest' just because it is unhinged and negative.
Some anon make some good reviews and are very helpful among all the troll posting.
I’ve… actually never seen AOC AI porn on there yet…
What year you think this is? 2015? 4chan is full of feds bro (i mean kinda, 2 dudes got arrested for saying "i would like to kill *some bullshit politician of florida* in minecraft"), the farms is the only free place on the internet now and is being raped by pedo troons lol.
can we all appreciate the greatest review of all time
Starefailed we appreciate
No
No. Literally everything on the list has, or can be, debunked.
@@ChitChatyea with enought Copeium that is
@@ChitChat is 7 years of development wrong?
No joke, I held off buying my 7900XTX because it came bundled with Starfield. I didn't even want the game on my computer for "free". I had to wait until AMD dropped the bundle before buying my new GPU.
Mass effect still remains the king of space games. Playing through mass effect legendary edition was probably the best single player experience of my life. Slightly ahead of witcher 3
Which one?
@@flyhighty i believe people refer to the 3 originals in the legendary edition. Andromeda is abomination, its for mass effect whats 76 is to the fallout series.
@@flyhightyThe original. The second and third games were more story focused. The first was story and exploration.
guess u missed star citizent then. Starfiekld is like ali expres version of that :D
@@lordzed83Star Citizen isn't finished, so how did OP miss it?
"Community would rather they don't update their game"
Too real. For some goddamn reason they released an update for Skyrim Special Edition like a year ago after there hadn't been an update in years that made tons of mods stop working.
After forcing myself to continue playing this game, I can confirm that this list is pretty much spot on. Todd Howard gonna Todd Howard.
i dont know if I can do it again if they dont drop a performance patch
@@jimmygoods put this into perspective, BG3 costs like 50-60 bucks
@@puddingsimon2626so, buy Baldurs Gate 3 is what you saying?
Well some things on the list are 50% correct. For example there are areas where you seamlessly go into houses and out, but other areas where even the smallest zone needs a loading transition for NO REASON. It can be confusing at times, you'll notice these things as you play for extended periods of time. But if you put the game down fast, you will not see the mixed bag experience, it does get better at least.
@@puddingsimon2626That makes Starfield worth nothing more than $10
I was amazed that people were already making mods for the game less than a week from its publication. And not just minor cosmetic mods, like changing some menu entries, but really major mods, like changing entire character models etc.
Then someone told me the reason why modders were able to do such major modifications to the game that fast: The game is just using the same engine as previous Bethesda games, with very little modifications. That's how.
On some aspects that might be a positive. From another point of view it just speaks of the sheer lack of innovation and development.
was anyone really expecting more??? like this is exactly what i expected
I did, I expected greatness. Especially when games like Elite Dangerous exist, which does space simulation perfectly
@StrobeFireStudios elite dangerous definitely doesn't do it perfectly and actually catches a lot of criticism from its fans.
I absolutely expected a Bethesda game. I don't see how nobody else seemed to expect that lol. Especially when u hear how long this game has been in development, like you should've definitely known it won't be taking full advantage of modern technology and systems like seemless orbital transitions and things like that
They are one of the most consistent companies on this planet.
True, after fallout 4 and 76 i don't know why anyone expected anything better from Bethesda.
@@StrobeFireStudios Yeah, but that game isn't made by Bethesda. This is a Bethesda game. It's shit
The ease of which a person can make a mod is a quality of good code. Not saying the source code for this engine is bad, just that the worse code is, the harder it is to extend and adapt.
It's definitely a plus. I don't know why this was mentioned in this string of negatives. Most games are so obfuscated it's very difficult to make mods for them but that is one thing Bethesda should be praised for. Opening their game to modders. And holy shit their games need it.
@theinfidel8244thank you. It's easy because people have been tinkering with the same code for the last 2 decades
@theinfidel8244 Spoken like someone who has no idea about writing software or proper practice. I'm a senior software engineer with 20 years in the profession and can confidently tell you that you're talking rubbish. Actual professionals avoid writing complex code, and parts of the dev pipeline actually involve reducing product complexity based on certain metrics to increase readability and reusability. Someone who tries to write complex code for the sake of writing complex code or see writing less code at the cost of understandability IS an amateur and they don't usually get their changes through PR, or stay on the team for very long for that matter, because people who have the mindset that good code is complex code are novices that have no place in a software house.
@@kiteofdark I think it was added by someone with a lot of experience playing video games but also doesn't necessarily know how they are made.
there's two sides of the isle here, guys. people who prefer a game to be easy to work with, code that easy to understand. that always comes at the cost of making the computer spend more processing power translating human-centric code into shit it understands, reducing game performance. the other side of the coin is games like Rollercoaster Tycoon 1 and 2, written on a codebase that's requires basically no "translation" for the computer and means whatever you program on it can run on the starchiest potato PCs out there, at the cost of requiring eldritch knowledge to actually make anything with.
Hopefully Internet Historian make a video about this game as well. 😂
Bruh, that would make me soo happy xD
Why? He can just take is F76 video, replace Fallout with Starfield and the video is done
V
he probably cookin as we speak
I don't think so, starfield seems to be their most bug free game and it seems to be enjoyed by a big portion of gamers, unlike 76. So it's not really notable, just very recent so everyone is talking about it.
This is a legit critique of Starefield.
Starfield: Game of the Year
Baldurs Gate 3: Sets expectations too high
I smell the sarcasm 10 miles against the wind. I feel you…
They are both mediocre woke games. Your standards are simply too low.
@@OilFreeFeathers did the pronouns trigger you? I’m sorry snowflake
i didnt play starfield but i can see its mediocre especially without mods. - but BG3? sorry but i really have to disagree? only thing is in 2023 the hole mainstream plays BG3, mediocre ppl included...but the gameitself it really miles above this@@OilFreeFeathers
The stockholm syndrome of gamers today is crazy for sure.
Read some of the reviews too.
"Game is buggy.
All I can do is explore dead surfaces.
Also I recommend this game, 10/10 this year. Good bethesda game."
Its bizzare and weird.
“Basically call of duty except you have to wait longer between releases”
Very true, except my PC can run COD
Some ppl defend Bethesda? Not only for free? But by paying them 70 to 100$ for a garbage game? Welp.
Copium is quite a strong drug
you play league of legends
yeh. It tires me out. We get shit games, as cumsoomers keep pre-ordering games on memeberberries for 100 dollars and deny that the games are shit@@GenericUserName443
@@zagon8692I don't think you will find him praising the game to be fair
@@zagon8692 still a better game than starefield
I heard someone said every game they release is for us to figure out what they lied about it.
"No good games for the past 17 years"
Looks like this bro is a die hard Oblivion fan
I mean, they traded flexibility in Oblivion (but fked up leveling system), for handholding in Skyrim.
The Outer Worlds: No loading screen when taking the elevator.
Starfield: Loading screen when taking the elevator.
Also the outer worlds : 30 hours of content throughout the entire game.
Starfield : 30 hours of main missions alone, nevermind the side missions and side content.
The elevator IS the loading screen, in this case. Which is great.
@@acca9169 Calling it content is generous.
To paraphrase one of their previous games; “Bethesda. Bethesda never changes”
I was the biggest Bethesda fanboy...until FO4. I noticed they weren't even trying to upgrade their games. I became a very popular mod author with Skyrim. And I realized after the whole mods behind a paywall, that they're just relying on modders to clean up their shit. I refunded FO4, passed on 76. And again. Refunded Starefield. I WILL support game devs who evolve not just stay laxed and don't spend money on upgrading because they want a bigger boat or mansion. JMO 🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷🏼
Starfield is FO4 in space. Which already was post-apo Skyrim. Now they merged them - FO4 in space with space shouts!
"Wasted 17 years to look like a No Man's Sky with mods made by newbie modder" is better description.
Starfield made me appreciate even more No Man's Sky.
Lol. I was just saying that no man's sky is the superior version to this. Starfield is a literal rip-off yet some how more devoid of life.
@@miketurner2095 it seriously sucks?
@@ornlu_the_wolfIt's not great, it's not terrible, but with the hype prior it is disappointing, plus my 3080ti can't run it without issues on lowest settings.
@viktorrudik6065 either ur lying or you pc is fucked. I'm running a 3080ti, max settings and over 60fps most of the time
@@miketurner2095 You sure about that? the only life in No Man Sky is a few space stations with static random gen aliens that all have the same lines too. Sooooooooooooooo
I really like starfield because it made me appreciate how great no man’s sky is.
Crazy how if you say you don't like the game the fanboys will start attacking you.
There's probably dozens of them at this point.
Crazy is that you're going to get attacked by subreddit asmongold if you're there defending the position that starfield is a bad game.
For me it's different I say I like the game, and haters attack me
@tomjo3470 same lol I don't mind tho I'm still enjoying my Bethesda slop
but "it's no big deal" and "it's just a game"
Fallout 76 was a wake up call for Bethesda and they just hit the snooze button smh
Bethesda made the Creation Engine in 2006 for Oblivion where it was actually ahead of it's time, but then they somehow fundamentally broke it when they tried to patch it for Skyrim, and they've been reusing the same fundementaly broken version of Creation Engine for every game since, INCLUDING trying to patch it for use in a MMO and we all saw how well that worked out..
I am certain they will use the SAME engine for Elder Scrolls 6 as well.
I honestly think they are stuck at this point.
Either they need to rewrite it entirely and not just update parts. Or take something like Unreal and lose the mod-scene...
@@_Ekaros Well that's sort of the point though right?
It's been enough time for them to build another Engine and try to future proof it to some degree.
Technology of game engines has come SOO far in the last 15 years it's mind blowing! Continuously trying to patch a Engine from 2008 to bring it up to 2023 standards is kind of insane!
I agree they cannot afford to lose the modding community, the modding community does a TON of leg work in fixing issues and patching their games, not to mention the longevity mods add to a game.
Maybe they're working on a new Engine, but to me the fact that Starfield released as is suggests they determined that Creation Engine is sufficient for their modern games into the foreseeable future.
"Community would rather they don't make new updates" is so legitimately and brutally true 💀
The "community would rather they didn't update their game" line is so true.
He also forgot to mention broken SDR and HDR, with no HDR at all on PC. Gotta love those milky gray blacks on an OLED
I saw some Starfield fans on Twitter shitting on a lighting mod because it deepened the grey blacks. They were saying it destroys the art direction lol. Like who the fuck didn't install lighting mods for Skyrim and Fallout?
Starefield breakdown great, no words to describe "gamers" reaction, Asmon reading the breakdown, priceless! For everything else there's mastercard
I prefer to call it "Starfail". Has a nice ring to it.
@@endy5enduros307 Starfailed?
@@normanmai7865 Bingo!
I knew it was gonna be like this, most space genre games are, I'm here playing bg3 still and having a blast and wishing there was a DLC for the game I could pay for
People forgot fallout 76 very fast.
It's been 6 years.
I really appreciated this video, as a medium-term VRE80H holder. I know you commented on not many people paying attention to this, but it was very relevant for holders such as myself. After watching your thoughts, I willbuy more. I also remember your earl
fuckin crypto bots
wut
Least schizophrenic asmongold viewer
Yes I agree. Ranjid told me yesterday that he made 100000$ a day through this amazing project. Thank you India for your revolution. I have a Ghandi statue in my house to honor you, dhanyavaad. I also eat Indian rice everyday to make Ghandi happy, now I get rewarded by my Indian friends thank you dhanyavaad.
Dude really astroturfed 1000 upvotes for this
Instead of spending 200$+ on D4 and Starfield EA i spent 60$ on BG3 that lasts me for more than a month and the rest on some nice fat fast food to accompany my actually enjoyable adventure. Best investment in my gaming life.
Bethesda's "Creation Engine" is way older than 2006, it goes even further back to the late 90's (1997) when it was called "NetImmerse". Yes the engine is well over 26 years old.
the interactions with npcs in 2023 - shoot them in the face, they curl up on the floor then get up and start telling you about their day! the immersion!!!!
Starfield was supposed to kill Star Citizen, but when I look up the website, Star Citizen is still there.
Yeah I also refunded the game, played for a bit, saw how bad it was, was welcomed with 100 loading screens, the illusion of exploration and Horrible NPCs starings... refunded so hard didn't even blink, probably using the money on Space Marine when it comes out
100 loading screens- Lie
Illusion of Exploration - Every game just about
Enjoy Space Marine, the success rate of WH40K games is not great lol I'm sure you'll suck it up and pretend its good tho like a good fanboy.
@@kyero8724the copium is strong with this one
@@kyero8724 loading screens are not a lie, you need like 6 screens to leave a building, enter your ship, and then go to another planet, there are loading screens in the middle of a fight, in the same fucking building, its sad as fuck, feels like a PlayStation 2 game
@@kyero8724 There are loading screens everywhere, remember when 10+ years ago games were so proud that you could change areas WITHOUT loading? Also good games hide the walls and corridors, if you can see the illusion, it's just a bad magic trick.
@@kyero8724U such a Bethesda fanboy XD (I see so many comment of you defending it by malding instead of debunk it with facts haha)
Funny thing about loading screens between buildings and stuff like that...no such loading screens in Morrowind. They're still segmented, yes, but you just instantly pop in the other side when you open a door.
Do you remember the vast open seamless 3D world in Dungeon Siege 1 in 2002?
yes. ds1 did do it. and many many other games. (witcher too) ... but BADhesda cant...
Everone is talking about how bad sony is, which is true, but Microsoft showed their true colors with their first AAA release in years. The fact that they gave review codes only on handpicked outlets, lied through their teeth with the marketing, and pulled this crap with the early access shows you that once in the future Microsoft buys the whole industry the quality of the games will be just like the quality of current marvel movies.
Didn't Microsoft show their true colors years ago by buying game studios and running them into the ground and saying you couldn't share games because of some kind of drm? Like blizzard after activision being bad or rockstar half assing gta remakes and sloping out rdr1 for 50 bucks?
Microsoft got fucked the moment they bought Bethesda, its been decline since daggerfall. Worlds greatest mystery is how Bethesda sold turds for two decades without getting crucified by consumers.
Handpicked outlets?
I heard they only blacklisted one outlet and gave the game to everyone else.
people should never trust anything microsoft does, they've literally paid billions in fines at this point for the amount of lies and anticompetitive practices they've done.
This is complete nonsense. If that were true, they wouldn't have given IGN or Luke Steven's a review code. I love how we're making up lies about the marketing now. Which is it Pony, they did not market the game or they did?
This game needs a Netflix anime series to save it 😂
Starfield's release pushed me to finally play cyberpunk
And I'm so glad it did
Wait....... did Bethesda just stole No Man's Sky first launch code and re-skinned it instead of confessing they did nothing during these last 7 years?
I wonder if the intentionally dropped F76 in the state it was in, not only for the online store, but also to make starfield look less shit in comparison
I avoid open-world games in general by now. I know how hard it is to build a real open world and most developers either don't have the resources or the skills to do it right, which is why we're either left with an empty open world or a fake open world that is still empty somehow.
Howard... Howard never changes
no wonder the AAA developers were weirdly angsty about baldurs gate 3 when it came.
this doesn't make me very excited for ES6 considering they're still gonna use the same engine
Skyrim is a good example. It's not bad. But investing to always bigger and bigger world is a mistake. Resources should have been used for livelier (and maybe bigger) cities, for memorable NPCs with good voice actors and for good memorable quests (there were some).
2006? They've been using that engine since 1999. They change the name and heavily modified it but the code base is still the same.