ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
102 - Navigraph Understanding High & Low Enroute Charts Tutorial in MS FS 2020 Navaids Airways
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ส.ค. 2024
- In the second video of our Navigraph Tutorial Series, I will explain High and Low Enroute maps and the symbols and terminology used on them. We will go through navaids, airways, distance to VOR, minimum altitudes, and more for you to get a complete understanding of how to read and interpret en route charts to properly use Navigraph and create your flight plan.
This Video is a part of a full Series. See videos Below
101 - Navigraph and MS FS 2020 The Basics - • 101 Navigraph Tutorial...
102 - Navigraph Using High & Low Enroute Charts Tutorial - • 102 - Navigraph Unders...
103 - Types of Terminal Procedure Charts (SID/STAR/IAP) - • 103 Navigraph and MS F...
104 - Reading Jeppesen Airport Diagrams Tutorial - • 104A Reading Jeppesen ...
Sup1 - Navigraph and VFR / Taxiing - • Navigraph and VFR flig...
Sup2 - Planning an IFR flight in Navigraph beginning to end - • IFR Flight Plan using ...
Don't Miss my Other video Series below:
TBM 930 Training and Flight and Instrument Operations - • TBM 930 Microsoft Flig...
0:00 - Introduction & Disclaimer ;)
2:06 - What are High & Low Enroute Charts
3:01 - What is the Difference Between High and Low charts
4:26 - V Airways - Victor Airways VOR
6:12 - T Airways - Tango Airways RNAV/GPS
6:50 - J Q Airways - Jet Juliet Airways and Quebec Airways
7:20 - Difference between VOR and RNAV Airways
7:51 - Other Airways
8:11 - NDB Non-Directional Beacons
8:55 - Airport Designators Green and Blue
10:00 - Airport Information on map Explanation
11:20 - Selecting Crowded symbols on map Multiple Items
13:02 - Flight Information Regions / Upper Information Regions
14:39 - Intersections / Waypoints / Mandatory Reporting
15:25 - Difference between Jeppesen Navigraph and FAA Charts
15:48 - MORA Altitudes - Minimum Offroute Altitude Clearance
17:17 - MOCA Altitudes - Minimum Obstruction Clearance altitudes
18:38 - Minimum Altitude Obstacle Clearance Explanation
19:02 - MORA Interesting Facts and History
20:00 - Navaids VOR/DME RNAV NDB VORTAC TACAN Stations
20:17 - VOR VHF Omni-Directional Radio DME Distance Meas. Equip.
22:25 - RNAV waypoints and Intersections GPS
23:36 - FIR/UIR Flight Information Region Boundaries
24:18 - NDB Non-Directional Beacons
25:10 - Military Warning Airspace Regions
26:03 - Oceanic FIR's
26:13 - FAA Transport Canada Chart Differences with Navigraph Jeppesen
28:49 - Holding Patterns
29:09 - Biggest Reason to use Navigraph to replace MS FS 2020 Nav Data
29:38 - Next Video
I still learned NDB IFR in the dark ages. Gods, how I hated them. I still remember my CFII having me fly an NDB approach, having me take my hood off at the MDA, and finding myself half a mile off centre-line of the runway. And being told "you actually flew that approach perfectly, this is a lesson: NDB approaches, just don't!" Oh, and subscribed! Bingeing your videos right now.
Mate, you have sold me on Navigraph. Thank you very much for your hard work in creating these tutorials, you've certainly taught me a thing or two here!!
Started using navigraph around a year ago on x plane, absolutely love it, and am learning even more about it with these videos! Never have looked at airspaces and always wondered how to know what centers to contact while enroute without atc directing you. Thanks for the thorough explanation!
Great videos, Thank you so much. From BC.
Hands down the best series I have seen regarding charts of any stripe and believe me, I've watched a few. Thankyou. These clear concise tutorials are definitely going to take my simming to a new level.
@@NOTAM1credit where it's due mate. Love from lockdown in Oz. :)
Not sure why you have so few views. These are some of the best tutorials on TH-cam, not just on Navigraph but on "cartography" in general. Thank you for posting them!
Thank you so much for these instructional videos. Your explanations are perfectly pitched!! I have just added the Navigraph data to MSFS and it certainly makes life much easier. I just did my first GA cross country IFR flight in Southern Italy, using a SID at one end, and an ILS at the other!
Thank you so much for these videos! Bought a navigraph sub earlier and this has helped understand it a lot! I hope to see a full flight tutorial using the charts and stuff as you go
i know im asking the wrong place but does someone know of a trick to log back into an instagram account..?
I somehow lost the account password. I appreciate any help you can give me
@Yusuf Dustin Instablaster =)
@Jaxon Clay thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site through google and im in the hacking process atm.
Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Jaxon Clay It did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy!
Thank you so much you saved my account !
@Yusuf Dustin happy to help xD
I can't imagine this could have been done any better. Thank -you.
Great vid mate, keep up the awesome work!
Hello my dear David,
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain these fantastic tools such as Navigraph in that detail so that we can apply them to the fabulous FS2020 with more efficiency and skill.
You have an unbeatable ability to teach, congrats.
I would like to ask you a giant favor and it is the following: Could you please create a set of tutorials to prepare a flight plan (it can be very short) using Navigraph to learn; the routines of that process and then load it into the FMC of the fantastic 787 that comes with FS2020? Thank you in advance for your attention to this message. Good luck! and I look forward to your answer!
Oswaldo
@@NOTAM1 Thanks buddy! 🙏 We will be attending those tutorials, meanwhile I will continue following you in all these classes! 👊😜
Take care and be healthy.
Ur amazing. Thank you for these videos.
Finally, the video series I've been looking for! Thanks for making these!
Also noticed a lot of acronyms flying about. LOL So much to learn.
Note that in other countries the Transition Altitude between local QNH altitudes and Flight Levels based on standard pressure may differ (US/Canada both use 18000', but I believe New Zealand uses 13000' for example, while in some other countries it varies from airport to airport). Presumably this also applies to the change between use of low- and high-altitude charts.
Wonderfully structured, delivered and produced. Many many thanks.
It looks like you invested time in this 2 years back and have not done anything since. Have you considered doing a review of Navigraph or LittleNavmap?
Thanks David, truly informative. I am new to Navigraph, testing it with MSFS2020
Great videos. I am trying to pick a nav aid. I know there are free ones, but I always feel, you get what you pay for. Since I am fairly new to sims, this is looking like my choice for MSFS 2020. Would surely like to see more. Thanks
Thanks a lot for making this series, David. I've been thinking of signing up for Navigraph to get a bit more serious about my sim aviation but found the whole thing a little daunting and it's hard to find thorough breakdowns of how to make use of it. With this video series I'm confident it's time to sign up and start playing with it.
Thanks great video. It always helps me to have the acronyms explained 👍
I would like to try the NDB stuff I think it could make a cool community event for say vatsim or something like that, test the community see who knows there stuff just for fun. but I know I would love to hear more about this, your videos are making me want to buy navigraph thank you for the easy to understand info keep up the wonderful work
Great video. Very clear and helpful explanations.
Thanks Again.
The VORs are aligned to magnetic north when they are built and do not change even if the magnetic field changes (they do). So the 'tic' points to 'a north' not 'the north'.
Excellent ... thankyou ... incidently I have noticed that at ground level a VOR signal may not be received until airborne ... also distance from a VOR station does appear to affect whether the signal is received ... however I’ve not checked this out for specific figures👍
Interesting. I was not sure how much they would have modeled this. I wonder if line of sight is a thing or not. Would be interesting to get low with a mountain between you and the station and see if its blocked. I'd be very impressed if this is modeled.
You mentioned making navigraph sync to the msfs data. Is that a settings option I missed? Right now it’s just using the current cycle.
Do I absolutely have to follow these segments when flying IFR ? Sometimes there a big gap between last point of departure and first waypoint where I end up in between routes.
Nope, at the end of the day what you file is what was accepted, but ATC can always re-route you as they see fit, and if you see the dotted line that cannot connect it usually means that airport doesn't have published procedures and if you click the dotted line it will say "vectors" meaning that ATC will vector you to your destination.
Great stuff
As you described the difference between IFR and non-IFR airports I noticed 3LA4 and Woodworth, both close to where I live and both blue on the low and high en route maps. Both have IFR capability, but no Jeppeson Charts. Do you know why this might be? Also, do you know why some blue airports have a solid blue dot in the center, and some do not? All of the green airports seem not to have the dots.
BTW, thanks for your Navigraph videos. I just got a subscription, so these videos will be a great introduction to them.
I may have misspoke... just means they don't have published routes. Many airports have implemented (especially RNAV now) approaches but they are not published. This is changing so fast with GPS approaches as these airports couldn't afford ILS equipment. I'm guessing these airports have RNAV and not ILS? Do you know?
Excellent video! When importing into MSFS it doesnt pickup arrivals and departures sometimes. So you need to adjust the plan in the sim map. But that destroys the route. Have you found a way around this?
@@NOTAM1 I have the same problem, I still have to enter the runways sids and stars, and MS2020 still picks different waypoints. Dont have this problem with Xplane
Make sure the waypoints are in your Navigraph plan, and then when importing them into FS, DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING. The only thing you can change is your starting point on your departure runway if you like to start cold and dark in a parking spot as I do. BUT... YOU MUST USE THE DROPDOWN TO DO SO. You can zoom in and figure out which spot you want, but don't click on it, rather use the origination dropdown. (It usually says Runway.) That should avoid the problem of FS trying to reroute you.
Love the videos, you've sold me on Navigraph. By the way, do I detect an east coast accent?
@@NOTAM1 I was wondering why you keep showing lower Ontario when I assumed you were American (because you keep saying "zee") :)
any tutorial for ICAO based ATS route name ? for the rest of the world ?
New sub here. Apart from the obvious pluses you've described with Navigraph, how could any aviation person not be hooked by someone who can manage to put the words 'fun' and 'NDB navigation' in the same sentence. :-))
lmfao.... ok.. thats funny. Shows the power of simulation in regards to me learning NDB's. I would have never got enough flight time when I was younger to really get a good handle on them other than theory, but I could boot up fs 4 I think at the time and just pull up the instrument panel that took up 3/4 of the bottom of the screen and learn to navigate with ndb's. Became a bit of a game between friends, but yeah, anyone learning it on paper might prefer a gun to the temple. I laughed pretty hard at your comment though.
I am trying to build a flight plan from ktpa to kmco tampa to orlando and there dosn't seem to be any valid flight paths. Both are international airports. What am i missing?
David
How we can download and install in the FS2020 the new Beta testing of Navigraph for charge the data?
Navigraph exports flight plans incorrectly, often times waypoints are ignored, and it always does high altitude instead of low.