ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2018
- When the owner and operator of the world’s largest refinery approached us with an ambitious lifting challenge, Mammoet responded by upgrading the world’s largest crane. In preparation for the project at Reliance’s Jamnagar Refinery, Mammoet upgraded the PTC200-DS to a PTC210-DS, providing the additional capacity required to lift a 2000-ton structure in one piece.
Watch Mammoet testing the PTC210-DS in the Netherlands, before being shipped off to Jamnagar Refinery in India, where it will save the client valuable downtime!
For more information about Mammoet, go to www.mammoet.com
#mammoetcranes #heavylifting - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![เกิดใหม่ทั้งทีก็เป็นสไลม์ไปซะแล้ว ซีซั่น 3 - ตอนที่ 64 [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pmsta0byEpk/mqdefault.jpg)
![โกหกเธอทั้งนั้น (Pinocchio) - SERIOUS BACON [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P1HhTYwrR5A/mqdefault.jpg)
As a mere fan I admire how Mammoet is always pushing the limits of heavy lifting and creating new solutions in order to overcome each and every obstacle they face. And I do think that this is exactly what makes the heavy lifting world so fascinating: it never ceases to amaze you, even when you reach the very top of it... just like Mammoet constantly does.
You took the words right out of my mouth!! Mammoet is the 🐐 GOAT
Mammoet truly does not have "No" or "can't" in their vocabulary. Impressive is clearly an understatement. Well done! 🙂👍
Makes your Tadano look like a hot-wheels toy! I mean the Tadano isn't precisely small, but this thing here is huge.
@@sandy1653, agreed! I'm sure the video doesn't do it justice either.
Chuck Norris of cranes !
As long as you don't have "no" or "can't" in your budget.
It would be interesting to know what Mammoet's bid was.
The budget has something to say about a "no"...
Lucky to witness the giant columns lifted using this Mammoth crane at Jamnagar. Also... Witnessed the month long assembly of this marvel.
Nice footage, stunning crane
Many thanks!
Mammoet has some of the finest engineers in the world, and the company is willing to take on enormous challenges. The new cover for the Chernobyl reactor is a good example, moving that required developing a new skidding system. I think that the recovery of the cutter head for the Bertha tunnel boring machine in Seattle was one of the most incredible jobs ever accomplished, because of the very tight quarters the work had to be done in, as well as the requirement to tip the cutter head 90 degrees with a single lifting system.
Thank you Scott. Our team of engineers and our teams in the field work hard to plan and execute these incredible projects!
I love watching these. Longer videos please Mammoet,
You have to appreciate Mammoet's lack of it can't be done. Need a bigger crane? You got it.
Impressive modernization of the crane! With each project you are surprised more and more!
Agreed!
Dear LEGO company,
This.
Sincerely, me.
LOL. Me, too!
Very informative video on the use of one crane.
0:47 Subtle dig at the client hahaha
Toujours aussi impressionnantes
Amazing heavy lifting,this is on another level!
It really is! :-)
This cranes comes to your facility in over 200 containers. Can you imagine that!
Very impressive..
simply.... WOW
Bonjour merci pour votre vidéo
I'm impressed.
When I worked at Kashagan in Kazakhstan, I saw a mammoеt crane with a capacity of 1500 tons
Cool video.
Thanks for watching!
It’s very impressive but I cannot comprehend how much this must have cost the company to pay Mammoet in build costs and logistics just to move something, what, 100 meters? How can that possibly be more cost effective than moving something in pieces!? They’ve had to redesign a gigantic rig, fabricate parts, ship it, assemble it, dismantle it. How can those obviously massive costs be better than just moving the thing in parts. I’m very confused and crave answers, can some one please satisfy my thirst for knowledge regarding this?
@zomgthisisawesomelol Right. The amount of money this refinery would lose in the days it would take to disassemble a building would be greater then paying to have a crane built. They have teams of people dedicated to figuring out how to save the company money...even how to cut 1/10 of a cent.
It's not just the time of dismantling and resembling the pieces. It's can take many days to shut down a refinery and a week to fire it back up.
Shutting down and firing up is also bar far the most dangerous thing they do. I work as a crane operator for a company that services the petro chem industry. The refineries are always on high alert when switching from production to maintenance. It's when they have the highest chance of an explosion or fire.
In general, modular construction, can provide several advantages when compared to stick building, but it always depends on the particular case and circumstances:
1. You can build several modules simultaneously - with stick built, you literally have to wait for the overall construction to be ready, piece after piece. A very example of this is the Nucor case: www.mammoet.com/cases/Nucor-steel-mill/. Instead of building the whole steel mill piece by piece one after the other , five modules were constructed simultaneously. This sped up the whole process by half a year
2. With modular construction, one can choose to build modules on site or in a separate fabrication yard. The advantage of the latter is that you can create more controlled circumstances. E.g.: you are less dependable on weather conditions or harsh conditions on site. A classic case here is www.mammoet.com/cases/signaturecaseRedDog/
3. Because of controlled circumstances, modular construction can be safer. E.g.: there is less working at height involved as the modules can be built up from the ground and lifted into place later.
It depends on each individual case whether modular construction is a better alternative to stick build and there are multiple factors involved that determine to what extent, in terms of time and money, such an approach would be more efficient and cost-effective. What also is taken into account is what the modular construction approach means for the uptime of a plant. For example: if a refinery yields one million dollars in revenue per day, every day won by a more efficient approach directly and positively translates into the profit and loss statements.
Hope this helps!
@@MammoetHeavyLifting
I work at #7 Blast Furnace at Arcelor Mittal as a mechanic. This furnace was stick built and took quite a long time, although 40 years ago, modular wasn't an option.
#13 furnace over at US Steel was built as completed levels at ground level, then stacked. This is a much more efficient and potentially safer way to build (although #7 is still technically larger)
@@drunkmike9943
The last time we had a huge crane, it was a million for setup and then a grand total of over 3 million and we had it for three days. Lol
nice video
It ain't much if it ain't Dutch ! Proud to be Dutch !
Haha! That's been the standard saying where I live for as long as us wooden shoes have lived here. (And I'm in the states)
"If you ain't Dutch, you ain't much".
This needs to be a Lego Technics Kit like immediately.
If you've got the money mammoet will move it, no matter how big
Good video
Badass
Pretty good way to maximise profit there..
I didnt knew that mammoet was Dutch 🇳🇱💪😮
😱
whats the timeline to setup from Sea to key Turn?
20 to 35 days to assemble depends on the site.
It’s not actually the biggest crane in the world the Sarens SCG-250 is 👌🏻👌🏻
yeah i was think ing that, also Liebherr has a crawler that can lift 3,000 tonnes
Hamlet Trương UAE 👷♂Introducing Mammoet's PTC210-DS EXO controlled
#modifiedcranes
#accesstoenergy
Awesome, can you imagine those idiots that wreck their mobile cranes in the Baltic states wrecking one of these?
Three huge crane's to put together the one of the biggest crane's you can get...crane porn...
Какя у вас зарплата?
Why is it that everyone has the big one in the world??? Why is that??
Biggest? What about Sarens their 3200 tons?
Omdat het ook zo is. De PTC is in z'n grootste configuratie, dus met maximale mast en jib lengte, nog steeds de grootste. De SGC-250 is amper twee weken geleden gepresenteerd. De PTC kranen meer dan 7 jaar geleden. Dat geeft wel een beetje aan hoe de en waarom de verhoudingen zo zijn. En ik moet erbij zeggen dat de SGC wél een hoger lastmoment heeft, al is dat vooral leuk voor de cijfers. Het zal heus kloppen, alleen met dit soort cijfers kun je niet zoveel.. In de praktijk zullen ze erg weinig van elkaar verschillen wat betreft capaciteit.
@@hanskoekoek8262 English please
Hi there, This is currently the largest live crane with a track record of lifts for the customer.
@@petea2721 The PTC still is the largest crane in the world. With maximum boom length and maximum jib length, the PTC is still the largest crane in the world. Larger than the all new Sarens SGC-250. Let’s not forget they introduced the PTC almost 8 years ago. In numbers, the SGC-250 seems a little bit stronger, but in real life on a job site the differences between those two giants are not that big. For me, the PTC is still, after 8 years, the king of cranes.
@@MammoetHeavyLifting correct. Because the SGC-250 has no track record yet, because its newer. And stronger. And bigger.
!!!!!!
That’s a nice crane, you should give me one for free
I own bigger cranes