Inflation's Next Move: Economic Collapse? | Steve Hanke

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @Wealthion
    @Wealthion  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SCHEDULE YOUR FREE WEALTH CONSULTATION with Wealthion's endorsed financial advisors here: www.wealthion.com/

  • @DanielMeininger
    @DanielMeininger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Professor Hanke is a great analyst with a clear and rational perspective - thanks.

  • @mchahal22
    @mchahal22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Prof Hanke is brilliant. Thank you for setting up the interview.

    • @Wealthion
      @Wealthion  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed the interview!

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment! I always enjoy speaking with Steve and wish I was back at uni!

  • @zipper1209
    @zipper1209 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best interview if seen in a long time. I really appreciate how the interviewer lets the expert time to explain.
    Thanks so much.

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor from Wealthion, thanks for the positive comment! We don't get enough of them.

  • @RachelCunningham-ut9ks
    @RachelCunningham-ut9ks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    loads of respect to hear an expert say "i dont know!" there is something to be said for honesty. and then he pivots to what he can deduce. thank you for the interview!

  • @stevenmix3723
    @stevenmix3723 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This was one of Prof. Hanke's more comprehensible explanations of his theory. Thanks for asking him the right questions, to pinpoint it. He is just about alone now in still calling for recession by year end, based on his monetary model. Will be watching closely, to see if he is on target, or too old school.

    • @alexisboucher523
      @alexisboucher523 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hear you I've had to hear him several times myself but today was pretty good.

    • @davidlai399
      @davidlai399 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When the government borrows a trillion dollars every hundred days to prop up the economy…

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the positive comment and taking the time to view our content!

    • @bs2951
      @bs2951 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      jibb bh

    • @bs2951
      @bs2951 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bj bibj bhbj bibj bjii bh i j j j

  • @georgeboutwell6069
    @georgeboutwell6069 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Applaud the Professor ❤

    • @Wealthion
      @Wealthion  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👏

  • @omerarduc7371
    @omerarduc7371 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    always enjoy prof hanke

  • @Oneofthetwelve
    @Oneofthetwelve 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So what’s happening with savings? Aren’t they very low? In Canada it’s an accelerating demolition of the economy by Federal Budget policies

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment/questions! There is $6 trillion sitting in savings and short term money markets in the US so a lot of money sitting on the sidelines.

  • @pamdemic7848
    @pamdemic7848 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Best!

    • @issenvan1050
      @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🐐🧿

  • @evorealtime
    @evorealtime 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How does this fit with the bull case for gold as a protection against negative interest rates, inflation and debasement of the money supply?

  • @frenchtelemarketer
    @frenchtelemarketer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    There is no battle.
    It is like telling .

  • @mattg8431
    @mattg8431 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wish someone could explain to me the difference between the money supply (prof. Henke) and liquidity (Michael Howell, Crossborder Capital). Prof Henke is making the case that shrinking money supply always led to recession, but last time it happened was in 1948? Lots of things are different now

    • @mountainman9145
      @mountainman9145 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Liquidity: the capacity of money to flow between and within sovereign nations, into and out of financial markets. As liquidity operates on financial markets it has impacts on asset prices. M2 has a small impact on liquidity however it mainly impacts the real economy. Liquidity initially affects financial markets which then,in turn, works its way into the real economy. Due to this lag effect you can have a booming stock market while the real economy can be struggling.

    • @ediddysmith2500
      @ediddysmith2500 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch Ted speaks ,he explains everything

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment and great point! I will bring this up with Steve the next time we chat.

    • @johnnycactus5140
      @johnnycactus5140 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mountainman9145 so is this all the euro dollars flooding back in cause we (us) cleanest dirty shirt?

    • @mountainman9145
      @mountainman9145 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnnycactus5140 According to Michael Howell it is mostly debt roll over on a world wide scale. As the world is so heavily in debt approximately 70 trillion dollars every year is allocated to debt roll over. This amount is generated by CBs, hedge funds, and shadow banks.

  • @johnmatthews7694
    @johnmatthews7694 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Im strugling to understand the contrast between Hanke's shrinking M2 thesis and Michael Howell's increased liquidity thesis. Is it a matter of timing or do they see things completely differently? I think the latter given Hanke thinks rates are too high and cross border capital think the Fed needs to keep rates where they are. I would love to get them together. Both are so smart.

  • @mohali4338
    @mohali4338 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand his point of view regarding the prices of assets. could someone please explain it?

  • @mgray3130
    @mgray3130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So many good points, including the FED and the party! I love it an F, I'd give them the same.

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor from Wealthion, thanks for the comment! Yes me too!

  • @michaels4255
    @michaels4255 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the way economists take their competing schools so seriously! They are like adherents of rival religious sects, it's hilarious! But I really do like listening to Prof. Hanke and hope you can get him on again in future episodes. It would be really fun to hear a debate between a monetarist, a Neo - Keynesian, a Post - Keynesian, a Neo - Paleo - Keynesian, an Austrian, a developmental economist such as Ha -Joon Chang, and an economic historian, but only via video conferencing because if they ever came together in person it might end in a blood bath or some poor economist getting burned at the stake. I am surprised the economics departments of the U of Chicago and MIT have not issued mutual anathemas of one another, but maybe it is only a matter of time.

    • @issenvan1050
      @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Monetarists vs. Eurodollarists

  • @ronaldvanderburgh8986
    @ronaldvanderburgh8986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Contraction of the moneysupply is clear. But the deffecit and the national debt now is much bigger. What does that tell us?

  • @rezsha3798
    @rezsha3798 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In a normal world Janet Yellen would be a janitor in a university!

    • @crash4dafun
      @crash4dafun 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup 😂, wouldn't even let her teach kindergarten now...

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor from Wealthion, thanks for the comment! Always good to have a sense of humor!

  • @mikemarshall35
    @mikemarshall35 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    does quantative easing increase M2?

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment/question Mike! I don't know the answer to this but I will ask Steve the next time we chat.

    • @mikemarshall35
      @mikemarshall35 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BloorStreetCapital Thanks for a great interview of Professor Hanke!

    • @jvz28az
      @jvz28az 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it does

  • @jvin248
    @jvin248 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good to see Steve mention the Smoot-Hawley tariff tax instigating the 29 crash and depression.

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong! Smoot/Hawley was enacted AFTER the Great Depression was already underway! Furthermore, 80 years of research by economic historians has concluded that Smoot/Hawley had very little influence on the subsequent course of the Depression, and of course no influence at all on events that happened BEFORE Smoot/Hawley was passed.

  • @edwardcotter7096
    @edwardcotter7096 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For the last ten years or so before retirement, I made loans to rehabbers and landlords. I observed that they would attempt just about any project for which they could get financing. From this I inferred that money equals permission to spend. If you earned it, you can spend on what you want whether wisely or not. If you borrowed it, the scope of spending might be limited. In the aggregate, an increase in money supply gives players in society permission to spend. Hence we see the effects which Dr. Hanke describes. That's my take on money as a former lender.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you measure the depth of a recession: GDP?

  • @jeffl6089
    @jeffl6089 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Who believes the inflation rate as stated by the government? In my world it seems a lot higher!

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's Jimmy Connor from Wealthion, thanks for the comment and I fully agree! Whatever their number x it by 2 or 3.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, Volcker grew M2 by 6%, in addition to the rate hikes?

  • @greg7811
    @greg7811 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since there's all these lags shouldn't we include the drastic rise in the m2 before it's slight dip to try to predict future and learn from past? We're not close to the long term M2 trend line, still above it.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wasn’t the YoY M2 contraction 4.5%?

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where does the funds rate fall under in Hanke’s monetarist equation?

  • @PaulEbai
    @PaulEbai 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My note on Dr Hanke, is when he advise the president of Ghana concerning the mismanaged economy of this west African country, when he asked (Mr Nana Akuffo Addo,) to not go to the IMF/world bank for a new loan for a ( bailout), for thayt would mean a default on the old loan, which will trigger IMF penalties and fees, which will hurt the country such as lower its forex exchange rate, and cause even more hardship to millions of Ghanians, unnecessarilly but to instead go back and do a self (Austerity) in his country s economy. By freezing further hiring, cutting back on contracts and new goverrnments programs, infact , trimming the excess fat on his countrys economic expenses, which would had been the right thing to do, but Mr Addo foolishly ignored him and went ahead for an IMF bailout loan, which end up collapsing his countrys economy in bigger debt, and hardship with a low were currency value and lower purchasing power for 30 million Ghanians and severe hardship.

  • @davidhemsted5372
    @davidhemsted5372 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The rate of change in money supply affects asset prices after long and variable lags.

  • @davidhemsted5372
    @davidhemsted5372 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Changes in asset prices reflexively impact economic growth and inflation after long and variable lags.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Change money supply by 10%, you’ll get 10% increase in inflation”, or different percentages for different countries?

  • @pressplay7922
    @pressplay7922 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    sure, commercial banks create the bulk of the currency, but they are enabled by the Fed with things like ZIRP and QE. they are even backstopped with things like BTFP. and it's all funneled to the wealthiest first, then they take it to the Wall St casinos. or at least they did. now, they appear to be switching to gold. they're all quite aware of the pending disaster they've engendered.

    • @crash4dafun
      @crash4dafun 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great comment!

  • @brynduffy
    @brynduffy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Over capacity will be the situation where a country over produces products in order to drive competitors out of business so they can eventually gain Monopoly power.
    It's not that hard.

  • @sebastienbechard798
    @sebastienbechard798 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Steve is the Yoda of the modern economy... listen what the master has to say.. “Inflation is the path to the dark side... the key money supply is"

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment Sebastien and I love that quote!

  • @davidhemsted5372
    @davidhemsted5372 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The rate of economic growth impacts the money supply - not the other way around.

    • @LunaLapin-ho5tk
      @LunaLapin-ho5tk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not when you use accounting methods to hide printed and borrowed money into earned income like the gov't does.

  • @martinithechobit
    @martinithechobit 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steve!!!!!

  • @Jackson-l3r
    @Jackson-l3r 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There is no real battle, just deceit.

  • @aucklandtoday9847
    @aucklandtoday9847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would more people in the system soak up money supply?

  • @bradjohnson233
    @bradjohnson233 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not trying to be disrespectful but what is the value of the wishy washy analysis presented ? Strong or weak recession end of 2023 or end of 2044 now? 12 mos. or 24 mos. lag but maybe longer this time? I can predict this (eventual recession) without a PHD and 30 graduate assistants with some certainty (subject to change with new data). Another good Fed economist candidate which is why we are in the financial quagmire we are in.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1.8% growth in M2 translates to 0.6% CPI, then, for recession?

  • @jmwSeattle
    @jmwSeattle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well Volker used interest rates to do it.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why should there be a recession if CPI is below-2%?

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was Greenspan a monetarist?

  • @tapptom
    @tapptom 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Who are these people who run the FR?
    Who are these people that are causing war in the ME?

    • @ecosignals
      @ecosignals 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Clearly, big money.
      It's so insanely geopoli tied now, it's not even funny.
      "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist”-Charles Baudelaire
      “The second greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he is the good guy”-Ken Ammi
      It is indeed very sad, that the firms, the rich, and powerful have got us so mind numbingly sheeping around, that we're oblivious to them blatantly DOING all the things they say to be afraid of!
      Question Gov, ok. But FEAR corps & Wall St.

  • @robertharrelson5024
    @robertharrelson5024 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    " My baby does the Hanke Panke."
    Tommy James and the Shondells.

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment Robert! Now I cant get that song out of my head!

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How should BTC behave during the next recession & with lower rates?

  • @henrykborecki3600
    @henrykborecki3600 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Money supply contraction &c.
    Simply look at the reaction of the people in an ordinary market. When the consumer has less money in his pocket, he can spend less money on the groceries. When the grocer gets less money from the consumer, he must raise his prices to make the same amount of money, or the grocer has less money in his pocket.
    When the consumer looks at the prices going up, he realizes that he will have less money to spend if he pays the higher prices. When the consumer cuts back, the grocer has to lower his prices, or business stops. When the consumer sees that the inevitable result will be lower prices, he will stop paying the grocer, and "see what happens."
    Everybody 'wins' with a lose-lose outcome: the consumer eats less, and the grocer goes out of business, and Happy Days are here, for the next generation!
    What do you think the FED and the banks are afraid of?

  • @hrothgar6832
    @hrothgar6832 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tariffs on China are ridiculous. They are building out manufacturing in Mexico. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does cash “drain out?”

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantity of money slowed down in Volcker’s time, but didn’t shrink, now?

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why recession EoY, not sooner?

  • @JM-gu3tx
    @JM-gu3tx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "suffering"? LMBO They dumped steel and other products at below cost value. That is evil. They don't play by the rules.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about RRP?

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is irrational exuberance the “animal spirits?”

  • @marklydon435
    @marklydon435 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So 76% of peoples money is in banks, and you wonder why people stay poor.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is 2% important?

  • @stephengerrard6412
    @stephengerrard6412 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    M2 ignores the trillions in money markets.

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor from Wealthion, thanks for the comment Stephen! I will bring this up during our next chat.

  • @dbehr4869
    @dbehr4869 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    well he has sure walked back the major recession he was touting to at least a slow down! A bit more humility is needed professor!

    • @brianoleson9224
      @brianoleson9224 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its bs , its clear it will happen in the short term 4 years after the pandemic the length before its known in your home and your neighbors home is no longer 5-10- 15 years away

  • @crash4dafun
    @crash4dafun 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "The facts were changed" - The facts didn't change. There were a few of us who were yelling from the roof tops "higher for longer" this whole time so not to have inflation come back but here we are...
    Bad players pumped the stock market while tricking retail traders and investors that AI technology was the next big thing. Now the big whales have sold off the top and the market is now dropping leaving retail holding the bag again.
    Also the increase in money supply started way before the pandemic...

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stronger or weaker the economy is in a NOMINAL sense, right?

  • @andrzejfrancikiewicz9964
    @andrzejfrancikiewicz9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    American will get big bobe

  • @georgeboutwell6069
    @georgeboutwell6069 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In spite of the cunning of art- ful political leaders, these three gifts from God precede all human legislation, and are superior to it. Life, liberty, and property do not exist because mankind have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.

  • @jeffo.31
    @jeffo.31 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The host said things look pretty good???

  • @Edgar4T007
    @Edgar4T007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There will be a collapse, he just doesn't know when 😂😂

  • @stephengreen7431
    @stephengreen7431 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He sounds like Ben Stein

  • @CarlRoberts-s7s
    @CarlRoberts-s7s 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    America dollars will.only be used in america.no.more.i.m.f or world bank sovereign debt.never ending inflation to failed state.😂😂😂

  • @siripornatsawathanaphaisan789
    @siripornatsawathanaphaisan789 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You were dead right Professor, the unemployment rate shot up to 4%

  • @TheRealSanchez
    @TheRealSanchez 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just love old guys who don't give a crap what everyone else is saying. EVERYBODY is saying rates aren't high enough and cuts aren't coming until 25 or 26. Hanke comes out and says Rates are way too high. Hahaha. He's correct BTW. Rates are getting cut this year. Probably in the next few months.

    • @LunaLapin-ho5tk
      @LunaLapin-ho5tk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't underestimate the damage the DC clown show will do. Even if it's not working, the feds will probably keep increasing the interest rate to collapse the real estate market. Our gov't has no problem doing the same thing over and over always expecting a different result.

  • @davidhemsted5372
    @davidhemsted5372 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Except for fiat money printing by sovereign states.

  • @Dieselpwr
    @Dieselpwr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The big reset

  • @CarlRoberts-s7s
    @CarlRoberts-s7s 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Summer.madness.comming.june.people would see the light of day.civil resulation.to.destution 😮😮😮

  • @Gustav641
    @Gustav641 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In Finland the so called right wing government just rised value added tax by 1,5. I guess the idea behind is to get inflation up immediately without lag. Altough they say that they only want to get taxflow immediately by this means I think they have the inflation in mind too.

  • @issenvan1050
    @issenvan1050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Monetarists vs. Eurodollarists debate

  • @williambudd2850
    @williambudd2850 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fed is engageing in wishful thinking. They need to get off their ass and get on with another interest rate increase!

  • @phillB
    @phillB 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steve, you are intentionally dismissing the method by which China overproduces. They essentially used slave labor. Yes it’s good for people like you in the wealthy, but what about the working class?

  • @patrickcourtney796
    @patrickcourtney796 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Steve Hanke is not trustworthy

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍👍🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦➕️👏👏✌️✌️

  • @FreedomAtRisk
    @FreedomAtRisk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hes smart but he doesn't manage OPM

    • @FreedomAtRisk
      @FreedomAtRisk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@geocam2 He's smarter than us.

  • @williambudd2850
    @williambudd2850 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is simpy not true.

  • @MrXXY-yx8qr
    @MrXXY-yx8qr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We must print and type in more money and have price controls

    • @JohnReynolds-ni5lv
      @JohnReynolds-ni5lv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Price controls fail every time. Venezuela, Germany come to mind.

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment and taking the time to view our content! I disagree with price controls. You have to let the market dictate prices. If prices are too high people stop buying,

    • @LunaLapin-ho5tk
      @LunaLapin-ho5tk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Printing just increases inflation in every country that has tried in throughout history.

    • @MrXXY-yx8qr
      @MrXXY-yx8qr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not if they have price controls

    • @LunaLapin-ho5tk
      @LunaLapin-ho5tk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrXXY-yx8qr Then you have absolutely nothing. Price controls just means that it will not be produced and that includes housing. That just makes the problem worse.

  • @richardgash2349
    @richardgash2349 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lol when will recession begin is a joke question

    • @BloorStreetCapital
      @BloorStreetCapital 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's Jimmy Connor, thanks for the comment Richard! Agreed but always good to put people on the spot.