It's great to see progress in the program, but for Goodness sake, *this is about science and technology, not about making music video with cuts almost every second!* Many viewers would actually like to learn something watching it, so in the future, dear Video Editors, don't try so hard to be so cool, because what you show is super cool already!
Following lockout/tagout discipline is pretty critical to spaceflight!! "what happens" depends, of course, on what was 'forgotten' but that's why you find the most OCD folks on the planet for your QA department :)
Worst case could be something like the shorting plug that keeps the thrusters from firing while on the ground. If you can't fire thrusters in space it could be 'game over'. When QA screws up that bad it can be a really bad day: www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0410/04noaanreport/
I have researched before about the Orion MPCV and it was said that the capsule will be reusable but what I have realized was that you guys (NASA) are building a new Crew Module and then my next question is, what are you gonna do with the EFT-1 Orion Capsule??
soon Orion will be assembled and headed into space first module is already on display at Kennedy Space Center this one will be taking us back to the Moon.
Don't you ever heard the proposal of Space Transportation System (STS) which was proposed by NASA in 1970? Space shuttle was designed to ferry crew and cargo between low earth orbit and the earth and was only one component of the STS which includes 1. Space Tugs, 2. Nuclear Propulsion shuttle between low earth orbit and interplanetary deep space, 3. low earth orbit propellant depot, 4. Space Tug based transfer vehicle shuttle between low earth orbit and the moon,5 Space Shuttle that ferry crew and cargo between ground and low earth orbit. The Space Shuttle was the only component of STS proposal approved by Nixon administration in 1972.
Darius Duesentrieb first two missions are test fights crew will not go aboard until 2019. in the meantime the components are being assembled all over the United States and in Germany. service module is being built at Airbus Industries in Munich Germany, Orion itself is being manufactured in Denver Colorado and at Mitchold Space Center in New Orleans along with the first stage core the SLS rocket, the engines are being tested at Stennis Space Center in Gulfport Mississippi, and the solid rocket boosters are being assembled at the Orbital ATK manufacturing plant 6 in Brigham City Utah when testing and certification is done all the components will be assembled in the Vehicle Assembly Building at Kennedy Space Center and transported by crawler to launch pad 39 b and it will be sent to the Moon but that won't happen until 2019.
I do find it strange that there isn't a more detailed review of what's happening and this looks like it's a quick quip for a TV commercial, which is what this really is. I'm thinking there's a larger review thing for this, however this isn't strait from NASA I think, just a re-published video. This isn't the channel "NASA" so one can only believe that this isn't the meat of it. Which is why I'm pulling my upvote for this and going to the actual NASA channel and give them my views, at least until this channel can be verified as official NASA.
@@goldenretriever6440 because large train routes are mostly controlled by the government. Space exploration is controlled by engineers and scientists at nasa. They already have the know-how, they just need to do more testing and fixing errors. you will see. also i can't believe how fast u responded lol. ur comment was literally 4 years ago.
@@firstlast9731 Well even so there are people saying that nasa should function more as a governing body leaving the building of rockets and spacecraft to companies like Space X and Boeing Personally I do believe private companies should handle the operations of space travel Mainly because space travel is too important to leave to governments alone Also private companies aren’t hampered by budget cuts Oh and as for me responding I guess I’m just crazy lol
@@goldenretriever6440 lol. but the problem is, why would Elon Musk send up a satellite that measures atmospheric pressure or temperature. Or what about a satellite that measures soil moister to help with farming. There is no reason for him to do that. His team is obviously pretty good at building rockets, but there's no incentive, besides money, for him to do anything like that. If nasa didn't give spacex the billion+ dollar contract, do u think the company would be near as successful? I do ever so slightly agree with you saying commercial companies handling rockets and nasa handling rovers, satellites, etc. Anyways, have a good day. or night cuz im bout to go to sleep. lol
Lockheed Martin has been working on Orion since 2006. so after 10 years and over $10 billion in so called R&D this is the best lockMart can do? one launch of an empty shell that made 2 orbits. Wow Congress, thanks for that.
I'm pretty sure EFT-1's Orion wasn't just an empty shell.Pretty sure it was pressurized on the inside and had the major life support systems on board as well as most spacecraft navigation systems
The NASA engineers in the 1960's must have been some of the smartest humans who ever lived on this planet. they were able to design the Apollo command module and build it and fly it to the moon in 8 years. Move to current day NASA and we've already spent 10 years trying to duplicate Apollo but add modern day computers and this revamped moon module still won't be launching any Astronauts until 2021 at the soonest (will most likely delay to 2023). Work on Orion started in 2006. Why do we let a few congressmen and senators who have NASA facilities in their States completely control NASA's budget? talk about a major conflict of interest to the rest of the nation. for decades lockMart and Boeing told us reusable rockets were impossible. they also thought closer cycle rocket engines were impossible. The Blue Origin and SpaceX came along and showed us that it was all a lie. Innovation is still possible in rocketry, especially since no real innovation in rocket science has happened since the early 70's. If NASA has an unbiased of directors from all walks of life who were making the decisions instead of a few corrupt individuals who care more for reelection then they do for true space exploration. if such a panel was put together so not even the president can make devastation cancellations that continue to plague the space agency every 8 years. they get 70% done and spend billions on programs that just end up getting cancelled for being underfunded and over budget. if my car mechanic charged me cost+ regardless of how long it to him to finish so you think I would keep using the same mechanic? I don't think so. So tell me why does NASA keep using the military industrial complex as it's main contractors when they always get behind schedule and over budget. they need to be FIRED! we need new leadership in NASA and in space exploration. I vote NASA use Blue Origin and SpaceX as it's main contractors, at least until lockMart and Boeing figure out how to be a real commercial space company and not just the recipients of having friends in high places with fat contracts.
Lochie S I think $2billion per year for the last 5 years now is a pretty healthy budget for the SLS rocket. Orion gets about $1.5b per year. spacex estimated $10b to fully developed the ITS, which uses all new tech from the raptor engines on up. SLS has already had more than $10b and had not even flown one time yet. this is the point in trying to make. NASA has a healthy budget but they're forced to spend a huge percentage of it on SLS/Orion. I won't be surprised if SLS gets cancelled due to its ridiculous price tag. I truly believe that Congress sets NASA up to fail on purpose. that way they are always in the R&D stage for constellation program, then with SLS. so after ten of billions of tax payer money is flushed down the toilet they get start all over again with the need ridiculous program that will probably meet the same fate. this cycle has to stop. when I was a kid I thought we'd make it to Mars by 2000. we are no closer now to Mars then we were 30 years ago. I'm tired of nothing ever happening in space except for the ISS. at least we do have a space station.
Jamie Godman I never said what they're currently getting isn't sufficient; I said it is insignificant compared to the funds they were given for the Apollo program.
I'll say it then, they don't have enough money is the problem. Lochie, go the wikipeda page for NASA's budget and look at the cart adjusted for inflation. You'll see a direct correlation between NASA big missions on a short timeline... VS today's big missions on a long timeline.
The space age is over. Check out the kessler syndrome. This will just add to it, increase the danger and the cost. Lets concentrate instead on the planet where we live.
This kind of video production really sucks. The use of quick cuts between 2 second scenes creates confusion and does not give the viewer any time to figure what they heck they are looking at. This is shot and edited like a phony trailer for a nonsensical sci-fi movie. It does nothing whatsoever to enlighten the tax payers as to what NASA is doing. Space exploration has now become nothing more than spending money and releasing useless information (like this crap video) which is not even very entertaining, no matter how intensely Hollywood the added music track may be. Just show the science with informative logical explanation and forget about this sort of useless theatrics. Thank you.
Congress please stop funding Orion and SLS. They are massive wastes of money. The private sector can do it faster and cheaper. Build the Nautilus X and concentrate on the Vasiimr Engine. To The Future And Beyond!
I think they've been working on SLS and such before the private space sector exploded. Might as well make use of the investment. I believe SLS 1B has a higher capacity than the Falcon 9 heavy. I'd love to see a side by side comparison and detailed cost breakdown though.
Both Space X and Blue Origin are building much larger rockets than the SLS. Ever dime we continue to put into it is a waste of money. They will both make cheaper and better and faster rockets than the SLS. Thanks for replying, but look a little more into each company.
PLEEEEAAASEEE make a full documentary version of this
This is the full documentary...
i would love that
They will when there Free too we got some secrets too keep a little longer... COSMIC COMMANDER AND CHIEF ORION
video should be much longer.there's so many intricate parts to be observed....had to pause it about 30 times.Awesome video!
yea
Congratulations on your progress to date.
It's great to see progress in the program, but for Goodness sake, *this is about science and technology, not about making music video with cuts almost every second!* Many viewers would actually like to learn something watching it, so in the future, dear Video Editors, don't try so hard to be so cool, because what you show is super cool already!
Is it me, or is the drill at 1:26 seriously twisted ?
Frankvidi No, it's not just you! That is so hilarious! Good job on picking that one up!
lol its not just u. he just kinda slow that day
So what happens if you forget to remove the things labeled "Remove before launch"
Following lockout/tagout discipline is pretty critical to spaceflight!! "what happens" depends, of course, on what was 'forgotten' but that's why you find the most OCD folks on the planet for your QA department :)
But lets say that the QA department got drunk or something that day and didn't notice or something. What would happen then to the spacecraft.
Worst case could be something like the shorting plug that keeps the thrusters from firing while on the ground. If you can't fire thrusters in space it could be 'game over'.
When QA screws up that bad it can be a really bad day: www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0410/04noaanreport/
I have researched before about the Orion MPCV and it was said that the capsule will be reusable but what I have realized was that you guys (NASA) are building a new Crew Module and then my next question is, what are you gonna do with the EFT-1 Orion Capsule??
2:03 a rope doesn`t overlap the shine of a lamp:) Like they draw a module and only after that added light
wat
awesome!
pretty cool
¿Contact? Film
Waiting for launch
Launch is by the year 2018
@@scheewheed8285 um
@@firstlast9731 that aged like milk lmao
@@scheewheed8285 yep
soon Orion will be assembled and headed into space first module is already on display at Kennedy Space Center this one will be taking us back to the Moon.
It's a shame to use the Apollo based old technologies of Orion capsules and SLS to go beyond low earth orbit!
Don't you ever heard the proposal of Space Transportation System (STS) which was proposed by NASA in 1970? Space shuttle was designed to ferry crew and cargo between low earth orbit and the earth and was only one component of the STS which includes 1. Space Tugs, 2. Nuclear Propulsion shuttle between low earth orbit and interplanetary deep space, 3. low earth orbit propellant depot, 4. Space Tug based transfer vehicle shuttle between low earth orbit and the moon,5 Space Shuttle that ferry crew and cargo between ground and low earth orbit. The Space Shuttle was the only component of STS proposal approved by Nixon administration in 1972.
Cool!
Will it be manned?
EM-1 won't, no
Not for the first tests, but later. Please be patient, grasshopper. :)
EM-2 will
Nick Gentile I'd vote for "Dawn Treader"
Darius Duesentrieb first two missions are test fights crew will not go aboard until 2019. in the meantime the components are being assembled all over the United States and in Germany. service module is being built at Airbus Industries in Munich Germany, Orion itself is being manufactured in Denver Colorado and at Mitchold Space Center in New Orleans along with the first stage core the SLS rocket, the engines are being tested at Stennis Space Center in Gulfport Mississippi, and the solid rocket boosters are being assembled at the Orbital ATK manufacturing plant 6 in Brigham City Utah when testing and certification is done all the components will be assembled in the Vehicle Assembly Building at Kennedy Space Center and transported by crawler to launch pad 39 b and it will be sent to the Moon but that won't happen until 2019.
So this is what informational videos are now, hundreds of two second scenes with music and no narration?
It really sucks.
I do find it strange that there isn't a more detailed review of what's happening and this looks like it's a quick quip for a TV commercial, which is what this really is. I'm thinking there's a larger review thing for this, however this isn't strait from NASA I think, just a re-published video. This isn't the channel "NASA" so one can only believe that this isn't the meat of it. Which is why I'm pulling my upvote for this and going to the actual NASA channel and give them my views, at least until this channel can be verified as official NASA.
Interesting stuff
I'd love to see a part two
Hopefully these boys will get us on a trip to the moon
Maybe mars
But not likely
y not likely u say
@@firstlast9731
Look at Amtrak
How do you expect a government who can’t get its trains to get places on time to get us to the moon or Mars
@@goldenretriever6440 because large train routes are mostly controlled by the government. Space exploration is controlled by engineers and scientists at nasa. They already have the know-how, they just need to do more testing and fixing errors. you will see. also i can't believe how fast u responded lol. ur comment was literally 4 years ago.
@@firstlast9731
Well even so there are people saying that nasa should function more as a governing body leaving the building of rockets and spacecraft to companies like Space X and Boeing
Personally I do believe private companies should handle the operations of space travel
Mainly because space travel is too important to leave to governments alone
Also private companies aren’t hampered by budget cuts
Oh and as for me responding I guess I’m just crazy lol
@@goldenretriever6440 lol. but the problem is, why would Elon Musk send up a satellite that measures atmospheric pressure or temperature. Or what about a satellite that measures soil moister to help with farming. There is no reason for him to do that. His team is obviously pretty good at building rockets, but there's no incentive, besides money, for him to do anything like that. If nasa didn't give spacex the billion+ dollar contract, do u think the company would be near as successful? I do ever so slightly agree with you saying commercial companies handling rockets and nasa handling rovers, satellites, etc. Anyways, have a good day. or night cuz im bout to go to sleep. lol
Lockheed Martin has been working on Orion since 2006. so after 10 years and over $10 billion in so called R&D this is the best lockMart can do? one launch of an empty shell that made 2 orbits. Wow Congress, thanks for that.
I'm pretty sure EFT-1's Orion wasn't just an empty shell.Pretty sure it was pressurized on the inside and had the major life support systems on board as well as most spacecraft navigation systems
Jesus !!! why are the best programs so short ? only 2:29 ? come on NASA...average Joe's like me can watch hours of this stuff ! thanks all the same.
*I see a few russian employees in the background*
when nasa gives you lemons
The NASA engineers in the 1960's must have been some of the smartest humans who ever lived on this planet. they were able to design the Apollo command module and build it and fly it to the moon in 8 years. Move to current day NASA and we've already spent 10 years trying to duplicate Apollo but add modern day computers and this revamped moon module still won't be launching any Astronauts until 2021 at the soonest (will most likely delay to 2023). Work on Orion started in 2006. Why do we let a few congressmen and senators who have NASA facilities in their States completely control NASA's budget? talk about a major conflict of interest to the rest of the nation. for decades lockMart and Boeing told us reusable rockets were impossible. they also thought closer cycle rocket engines were impossible. The Blue Origin and SpaceX came along and showed us that it was all a lie. Innovation is still possible in rocketry, especially since no real innovation in rocket science has happened since the early 70's. If NASA has an unbiased of directors from all walks of life who were making the decisions instead of a few corrupt individuals who care more for reelection then they do for true space exploration. if such a panel was put together so not even the president can make devastation cancellations that continue to plague the space agency every 8 years. they get 70% done and spend billions on programs that just end up getting cancelled for being underfunded and over budget. if my car mechanic charged me cost+ regardless of how long it to him to finish so you think I would keep using the same mechanic? I don't think so. So tell me why does NASA keep using the military industrial complex as it's main contractors when they always get behind schedule and over budget. they need to be FIRED! we need new leadership in NASA and in space exploration. I vote NASA use Blue Origin and SpaceX as it's main contractors, at least until lockMart and Boeing figure out how to be a real commercial space company and not just the recipients of having friends in high places with fat contracts.
Keep in mind the difference in funds. NASA only has a small fraction of the funds they had during the time of Apollo.
which is why it needs an objective
Lochie S I think $2billion per year for the last 5 years now is a pretty healthy budget for the SLS rocket. Orion gets about $1.5b per year. spacex estimated $10b to fully developed the ITS, which uses all new tech from the raptor engines on up. SLS has already had more than $10b and had not even flown one time yet. this is the point in trying to make. NASA has a healthy budget but they're forced to spend a huge percentage of it on SLS/Orion. I won't be surprised if SLS gets cancelled due to its ridiculous price tag. I truly believe that Congress sets NASA up to fail on purpose. that way they are always in the R&D stage for constellation program, then with SLS. so after ten of billions of tax payer money is flushed down the toilet they get start all over again with the need ridiculous program that will probably meet the same fate. this cycle has to stop. when I was a kid I thought we'd make it to Mars by 2000. we are no closer now to Mars then we were 30 years ago. I'm tired of nothing ever happening in space except for the ISS. at least we do have a space station.
Jamie Godman I never said what they're currently getting isn't sufficient; I said it is insignificant compared to the funds they were given for the Apollo program.
I'll say it then, they don't have enough money is the problem. Lochie, go the wikipeda page for NASA's budget and look at the cart adjusted for inflation. You'll see a direct correlation between NASA big missions on a short timeline... VS today's big missions on a long timeline.
come on launch it
The space age is over. Check out the kessler syndrome. This will just add to it, increase the danger and the cost. Lets concentrate instead on the planet where we live.
plot twist: falcon 9 :D
This kind of video production really sucks. The use of quick cuts between 2 second scenes creates confusion and does not give the viewer any time to figure what they heck they are looking at. This is shot and edited like a phony trailer for a nonsensical sci-fi movie. It does nothing whatsoever to enlighten the tax payers as to what NASA is doing. Space exploration has now become nothing more than spending money and releasing useless information (like this crap video) which is not even very entertaining, no matter how intensely Hollywood the added music track may be. Just show the science with informative logical explanation and forget about this sort of useless theatrics. Thank you.
Congress please stop funding Orion and SLS. They are massive wastes of money. The private sector can do it faster and cheaper. Build the Nautilus X and concentrate on the Vasiimr Engine. To The Future And Beyond!
I think they've been working on SLS and such before the private space sector exploded. Might as well make use of the investment. I believe SLS 1B has a higher capacity than the Falcon 9 heavy. I'd love to see a side by side comparison and detailed cost breakdown though.
Both Space X and Blue Origin are building much larger rockets than the SLS. Ever dime we continue to put into it is a waste of money. They will both make cheaper and better and faster rockets than the SLS. Thanks for replying, but look a little more into each company.
Building a super heavy lift vehicle reusable or not definetly doesn't sound like a waste to me
The earth is flat.Don't be afraid. Do the research.
I'm not afraid of the truth; but I am afraid of lies and those who spread them. That is why, Sir, I am terrified of you.
You're right. Don't leave home, you might fall off the edge!
Nice b8 m8