illogical verse in the Quran!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- Adam Elmasri on Linktree (all links): linktr.ee/adamelmasri
Adam Elmasri - Social links:
Official Website: www.adamelmasri.online
Patreon: / adamelmasri
Facebook Page: / youtuber.adam.elmasri
Facebook personal: / adam.elmasri.official
Instagram: / freethinker_adamelmasri
Twitter\X : / adamelmasri_ad
PayPal: adamelba7eth@gmail.com
It's revealing how the Mufassireen had to jump in to express what the Allah couldn't express clearly in the first place.
Yes, it reveals how narrowly _THEIR_ interpretive scope was due to the strict tradition and exegetical custom they were immersed in. But it says absolutely nothing about the coherence of the verse itself, which can easily be understood with a moral flexible and Qur’an-centric perspective that accounts for the whole of the evidence.
Even the clearest of statements (“the sky is blue” or “there are two genders”) can be misunderstood and re-interpreted in countless ways by people who have pre-conceived notions, attachments, and biases that sway or prevent them from one understanding over another. For example, even the elementary statement above (‘there are two genders’) is not only re-interpreted, but today stands as literally one of the greatest controversies of our modern generation, despite its blatant simplicity. It just goes to show you how culture, bias, upbringing, environment, and pre-supposition can massively influence the way you see things. And if you think that you are free or immune from such influences - then you are in fact likely the deepest one in it.
But disagreement or misunderstanding does not disprove revelation. It just proves the fallibility of humans, which is what the revelations insist on to begin with. In fact, the Qur’an itself acknowledges such fallibility in comprehension and the persistence of disagreement:
*”…So what is the matter with these people, that they can hardly understand a statement?”* ~ Qur’an 4:78
Or when it declares:
*”To God is your collective return - where He shall then explain to you all that you used to disagree about.”* ~ Qur’an 5:48
We also have examples like Qur’an 11:71, where the laughter of Abraham’s wife precedes the mention of her son Isaac - a fact that also confused many of the early Islamic exegetes and gave birth (no pun intended) to many varying interpretations, even some that supposed the Arabic word ‘dhahak’ (to laugh) to possibly mean “to menstruate”! - All in a desperate attempt to explain the apparent incoherence with mentioning Sarah’s laughter & surprise before her son’s birth was even announced.
Yet it was only later with new insight and a fresh pair of eyes that we discovered the deeper Arabic-Hebrew play of words being employed, due to the fact that the name Isaac literally means ‘laughter’ in ancient Hebrew. Thus the verse suddenly made perfect sense: ‘His wife laughed, and thus We gave her the news of Isaac (‘laughter’)”.
This is just one of several examples that goes to show how uncovering the deeper layers of the Qur’an-and approaching it with a wider horizon-can reveal many things and clear up potentially ambiguous passages which were once thought to be enigmatic. Yet even in the midst of such passages (both Qur’an 11:71 and here in Sūrah 43), the essence and foundational teaching behind the verse remains perfectly clear and coherent - God is the one & only, and no other messenger has been sent with a message that states otherwise, or preached a different god to be worshipped.
Finally, the fact that these words were never changed throughout the centuries - as was the case with parts of the Bible for theologically agenda - demonstrates that despite the occasional confusion, the Muslims never attempted to intentionally alter the words of the Qur’an for their own benefit. This point is also acknowledged by non-Muslim Qur’anic scholars like Nicolai Sinai, who evinces passages like Sūrah 3:96 as clear evidence that religious or politically motivated textual corruption was virtually non-existent in the Islamic tradition.
@@celestialknight2339and of course, nothing you said proves mohammed was a prophet, that God made him a messenger, or that God exists.
But but but...We have given you a clear Qur'an! 😂
@@FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000 Nothing you just said proves humanism, atheistic naturalism, or your theory of ethics. - Are you a bot? Are just too dense to understand that the original comment had utterly nothing to do with proving such theories & beliefs? You are basically having an irrelevant discussion with yourself. Well enjoy it, I guess!
@@prahaladbhat3512atleast muslims know when that was return and there are 100% proof that such thing existed
As per my knowledge and after asking my more than 15 hindu friends none of them knew when this events took place or are there any single solid proof about it’s existance…
Highly appreciate you if you could give me se reference brother.
And please don’t give that ram setu example.
As an ex muslim(atheist now)I've learned that no matter what you say or do they will blindly believe it, islam is made to be strongly believing no matter what and you cannot question anything about it. The only way for someone to get out of the religion bubble is up to them to follow logic. No body can convince someone.
To some extent, I agree with you. But those who will follow the logic eventually, they still need to be shown the way and the logic to stimulate their brains
Quran 11 : 13
Or do they say, “He has fabricated this ˹Quran˺!”? Say, ˹O Prophet,˺
“Produce ten fabricated sûrahs like it and seek help from whoever you can-other than Allah-if what you say is true!”
Should be easy.....GATHER THE ATHEISTS.
Go ahead and put that little stone in their shoe anyway. At some point along their journey, they will have to stop and contend with it, even if they pretend to dismiss it for the moment. I think a lot of Muslims are afraid when you cause them to doubt; they grew up being punished for asking questions, so they inherently react with denial and fear to the points you raise. They want to save face. And they know the high price they will pay if they leave Islam, or if anyone even thinks they have. I think most Muslims secretly carry doubts but are afraid to acknowledge them. I think a lot of Muslims also think that everyone around them is a stalwart believer, so when they find out that others also ask a lot of these good questions, they can relax a little bit and admit their own doubts, too. So yes, keep pointing out the issues.
@@formidablefaith569 Are you saying that the Quran is making a fallacious argument? That something being inimitable, especially a piece of literature, means that it is of divine origin?
Basically, the Quran is making the following argument:
P1. Necessarily, if something is inimitable, it is of divine origin.
P2. The Quran is inimitable.
C. Therefore, the Quran is of divine origin.
Premise 1 is clearly false. That is a horrible and illogical argument. Not the kind of reasoning that one would expect to see in the 'revelation of God'. This challenge itself is as strong evidence against Islam as you can get. The Quran refutes itself.
U stupid 😂@@AdamElmasriEnglish
It's fear of cancellation that people don't risk following social critics, as only 15% subscribed. The majority has the power. Either we join their groupthink, or get threatened
Do you think that subscriptions can lead to problems for subscribers? How and where? And if subscriptions are dangerous, what about occasional comsumption of the videos of this channel?
I think are other reasons why many visitors don't subscribe. E.g. I don't think that Muslims like to subscibe to this channel, but perhaps some of them will visit it occasionally. That should not be a problem, in fact it would be good, wouldn't it? Being a Christian, I subscibed. But I've got many (Christian) channels I like more. Other Christians may decide against subscribing. The same with Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, ... Why subscribe to a channel of a non-believer? And most non-believers don't care for religions / topics of faith.
A couple of more problematic verses:
Surah 6 14 tells us that Mohammed is the first to submit and yet the Quran teaches that Jesus' disciples were Muslims. If this is true then Mohammed was not the first to submit.
Surah 5 20 tells us Moses made kings out of the Israelites. This is opposite to what the Bible teaches. Moses warned the Israelites not to have kings. Kings did not come until long after Moses when the Israelites were descending into rebellion against God. Mohammed needed a new wristwatch as his was full of anachronisms.
Quran says that for every nations/people God sent their own prophets to guide them in their own language.
Thus there is always the first Muslim in every group.
Bible has not yet been accepted by the world as the standard of truth. Why?
Bible is full of errors, contradictions, inconsistencies, discrepancies.
To take it as the standard of truth is actually silly.
@@letmetalk2240 But your Quran says multiple times that the Torah and Injil are good revelation from Allah, that's Allah's words cannot be changed. So if that is so, as a muslim you should accept them. The Quran author seems to have problems accessing Bible texts, and was using often strange "class 2" resources instead. But muslims have not got that problem, and so logically if they believe Allah, they should study the Bible. For instance in the Bible there are 16 books by prophets, and many other prophets including great ones like Moses, Elijah, Elisha and Samuel mentioned in historical style narratives. The gospels are massively long and from the right century, compared with the skimpy accounts about Isa in the Quran, which use non-canonical material (and written 6 centuries later, somewhere in Arabia/Shams/Iraq).
@@collybever >>>>> But your Quran says multiple times that the Torah and Injil are good revelation from Allah,
================================
Yeah. The Torah and Injil given directly to Prophet Musa AS (Moses) and Prophet Isa AS (Jesus) respectively in the form of revelations. Not given to any Tom, Dick or Harry.
@@letmetalk2240where is the Chinese prophet?
The Quran who was revealed by Satan to a pedophile as the word of God and truth? Thats laughable, since the Quran contains historical errors, agnostic stories, and plagiarized previous scriptures not to mention the fact that there’s several Qurans that contradict one another.
@@letmetalk2240 to believe a man who liked having saxx with a 9 year old is your best moral example is not only silly it is downright stupid.
Al Lah knows best 😅
Prophet Muhammad whilr travelling to the heaven with Gabriel he met prophets like Musa(Moses),Ibrahim(Abraham), Isa(Jesus) peace be upon them and then this Surah revealed to Prophet s.a.w
Keep it up Adam
Another well studied insight within and between illogical & discrepant verses that, I believe, are not easily discernible even to many Arab speaking Muslims.
Thank you for the clear, concise exposè.
In Islamic tradition, there is no explicit mention of Prophet Muhammad interacting with other prophets outside of the event of Isra and Miraj in terms of direct encounters. However, there are narratives in Islamic literature where Prophet Muhammad is believed to have conversed with other prophets and messengers in various spiritual contexts, such as during his nightly prayers or in visions. These encounters often serve to emphasize the continuity and unity of the prophetic message across different times and cultures. While such interactions may not be explicitly detailed in recorded accounts, they are acknowledged within the broader framework of Islamic belief in the interconnectedness of prophethood.
So your claim on God asking the previous Prophet’s of God if they were told to worship Allah SWT.
This isn’t god saying I told you I am god now confirm with the messengers. No it’s god saying Ask the Messengers if they were told to worship just me as the people on earth do differently (perhaps) people thought or even the messenger that God ultimately made different revelations for them which isn’t the case.
See… brother @zt8337 - the fact that we are deciphering the events and verses and that “perhaps” you used at the end of your comment, shows that “God” or whoever wrote that text, didn’t do a good job. Because, it is either illogical and makes no sense OR it is completely vague (if logical) and still makes no sense. Hence you used “perhaps” because even a believer doesn’t know for sure what it means. This is why early Muslim scholars tried many explanations and many “perhapses”
In that sense, the Quran is not crystal clear as it claims (عربي مبين), yet another illogical claim from the Quran’s author.
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Im sorry Adam this video was just you assuming that the prophet saw couldn’t interact with other prophets while there’s no Islamic Hadith or verse that states that he can’t.
Matter of fact is there are implications and acknowledged facts that he could through visions etc and even if that wasn’t the case the verse had to be viewed in a broader framework regarding timelines etc which you failed to present or perhaps do careful research on.
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Perhapsness came from me and not from the scholars it was just an idea on what the people might’ve thought. There’s many perhapses examples I can use outside Islam.
Your explanation is always so clear. I like your videos. I once heard Zakir Naik say that he does not understand 20% of the Quran. Can you make videos on this 20% that nobody understands.
Good job 💐🌷🌺🌹
Thank you
12th here. Keep doing the good job brother. ❤
Appreciate it!
Islam covers every aspect of life - including the fear that a wife may (perhaps) disobey her husband: Quran 4:34 reads, “As for those of your wives who you fear will be disloyal and disobedient, warn them (first), refuse to share their beds (second), and then beat them…” In his book “To Beat or Not to Beat”- page 544, the Islamic scholar Mahmoud writes, “They contended that the phrase “refuse to share their beds” is not about forbidding the performance of sex act (with the wife); but rather, it is a particular manner of the sex performance - the husband can have sex with his disobedient wife, but he should signal his indignation (anger) by not speaking to her during the (sex) act.”
*
Of course, this is in accordance with Allah’s instructions to husbands as recorded in Quran 2:223: “Your wives are a tilth (cultivating field) unto you; so, approach (or plow) your tilth when and how you will…”
Beating & killing disobedient children in the Bible…Proverbs 23: 13 & 14; Proverbs 13:24; Proverbs 19:18; Matthew 15:4; Exodus 21:15 & 17; Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21
Beating servants and maids…Exodus 21:20 - 21
Interesting. I always entertained the idea that the "don't share their bed" part actually means "don't cohabit with them". Some translations use the word "cohabit" (Amhad Khan).
So it would mean that you degrade her temporally from being the second highest authority in the house (when your sons are still young) to slightly above the status of maids and slave girls. And that she might be forced to live with them in some shed or barn and not in your house and bed.
That seems to me a more logical punishment.
Another option that is also highlighted by some translations (Arberry) could be "to banish them to their couches". Which could basically mean to imprison her. This would also seem to be a more logical interpretation to me.
What I mean in general is that if I am a disobeying wife and this disgusting guy isn't approaching me in bed anymore like he wishes or isn't talking to me in bed anymore, I would celebrate!
So this wouldn't be a punishment at all and in my opinion it wouldn't fit between "warn them" and "beat them". The other two I mentioned would fit there.
@@ZeroCelsius777 either you are folly understand or don’t want to understand. The passage explains individually what is the consequence of cursed, punishment children, discipline for disobedience. Don’t twist the words to killing or beating.
Why don’t you explain what is the meaning of this passage, Sahih al-Bukhari 2925 Book 56, Hadith 138. Sunan Abu Dawud / Book 38, Hadith 4390. Surah At-Tawbah 9:5.
Muslims: Qur’an is error-free. It’s all true.
Me: My cow lays a golden egg.
0h, give me this cow please !
Hi Adam ,I put this verse along with a summary of your commentary for Müslïms to comment on another channel , and they went on a
face saving mode by inserting the words "followers of" the prophets 😂😂😂😂
It’s exactly what I said at the start of the video… they will take a copy and paste answer because that’s what they were given over and over again!
Thanks for sharing 🙏
Hey Adam
You do make a lot of sense. From my Christian point of view,.no evidence for anything that muhammad received only his word. It's pretty evident that it's a mixed up book.
I have to trust the historical evidence for Christ.
Nothing new I am saying. No one can refute Jesus lived, His execution, even His resurrection was witnessed by many.
Now for me and as many great apologists, theologians, authors etc have said.
Either Jeaus was who he claimed to be (God) or he was a complete lunatic or worse.
To just claim like muslims (the quran) he was a wise prophet etc, is utter nonsense.
It is either true or false, the evidence indicates yes He was actually God in human form, regardless how foolish that may seem.
Love God with all your heart, soul and mind, then love others as yourself. Now I don't think there is any way it could express peace better than those words
Yes there are some harsh lessons and sayings in the bible, I think you mentioned somewhere about how peaceful the message was spread (mainly)
In the end,.the New Testament is the most important book (s) ever written down.
Believe or don't believe, God has left that choice to everyone.
Sadly many have missed the true love of Christ
Jesus did say that false prophets would come after him. Is this what they are talking about?
By their fruits you will know them.
Even jesus was a false messiah
@@TingTong2568prove it
@@cheeze7777 ask rabbi tovia singer
If there is no true prophet then he will not warn you from a false prophet sir or else he will just say there is no other prophet that will come.
Thanks for the video Adam, I wish you were around more often, even if just in short live videos, chatting with other people (Muslims, ex-Muslims, atheist etc). Please keep it up.
What an amazing channel !! More power to you !!
Thank you so much!
It's so simple that a kid can understand it. The sentence "those of our messengers we sent before" is referred to the people of the book, so simply the prophet Mohammed pbuh was ordered to debate the people of the book about the oneness of god, and not for the sake of interrogation and seeking for answer, because Allah already clarified that. It was an averment and an establishment of the argument to those non believers.
Did you watch the video?
Did you see why that explanation is not as simple, and it caused trouble to early Muslim scholars?
@@AdamElmasriEnglish I just clarified that from the explanation of the new scholars, doesn't it look logical to you ?
@@mouhammedbrik3471 idiots can't understand basic logic.
Thanks a lot for your videos, Adam. By fighting against ignorance and indoctrination, you're doing God's work... If I may say so!
Sir, I suggest you use a decent condenser microphone for a better audio.
It’s actually quite simple. There were most likely other Jewish and Christian preachers around the time of the Prophet Muhammad (as history now reveals it was a very diverse milieu), whom God thus casually refers to as “messengers” (not necessarily in the sense of direct inspiration, but in the raw literal sense of ‘one who carries and conveys of the message’ [رسول]). Therefore, the Prophet is being told that he can go to these people of previous revelations and discover that indeed, the message of One God has always remained the same until now. This matches Sūrah 10:94, where the Prophet is told that he can go to people who are learned in the previous Scripture for clarification. And such surprising statements actually showcase that: 1) The Prophet did not author or pen the Qur’an himself, as this violates the ‘principle of embarrassment’; and 2) The Muslims did NOT attempt to remove or alter these passages despite the opportunity to do so, which demonstrates the remarkably high degree of integrity & preservation that the text bears.
Moreover, Sūrah 43:45 does not mean that the Prophet should have low confidence in the revelation he’s received - this is a false conclusion. Rather it is merely a rhetorical statement of the Qur’an to reinforce the point being made, such as when someone tells a friend: “Go ask the neighbors yourself! Trust me, they will tell you the same thing!” - or if we tell a fellow employee: “Ask all the employees before you! They can tell you how great this job is.” …It is not literally a call to go knock on the door of every single neighbor, or find the administration’s phone-book and call every single previous employee - no, rather it is simply a rhetorical statement to strengthen the argument, which the Qur’an often employs.
Finally, when the verse says “whom We SENT” (arsalnā) this can be understood in the passive tone of “letting go” or “permissively allowing to preach the message” rather than direct personal divine inspiration given to these regional preachers who were around at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (just like we now know they were even many such Jewish messengers/preachers roaming during the time of Jesus in ancient Judea & Palestine). And the evidence for this is in Sūrah 7:105 of the Qur’an, where Prophet Moses says to Pharaoh:
*”…I have come to you with clear evidence from your Lord, so let the Children of Israel go with me (فَأَرْسِلْ مَعِيَ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ)* ~ Qur’an 7:105
Here, the Arabic word for “let go” is exactly the same word used in Sūrah 43:45 for “sent” _(arsil/arsal)_ but it clearly means to passively let the Children of Israel go free, rather than actively dispatch them somewhere (since Pharaoh obviously wanted them to say and remain his slaves).
Likewise, we read Joseph’s brothers say in Sūrah 12:12 of the Qur’an:
*”Let him go with us (أَرْسِلْهُ مَعَنَا) tomorrow, that he may roam and play; we will take care of him.”* ~ Qur’an 12:12, Joseph
Here once again, the identical word for “send” in Sūrah 43:45 is used verbatim, but it is in the passive tone (‘let him go/allow him to come’) rather than an active command to actually send or deliver him somewhere. And so too can we understand the term in Sūrah 43:45 as a passive authorization, rather than a direct injunction.
So in the final analysis-putting aside all creedal commitments and sectarian dedications-we can simply understand the passage in Sūrah 43:45 to mean the following:
*_”’And you can even ask those before you whom We have allowed to roam among the various preachers of Our message - that have We truly ever set up other deities besides God to be worshipped?’_* ~ Qur’an 43:45
Your explanation is very good. Better than i can ever explain.
And also the first point he mentioned can be refuted. Because he said that Allah already mentioned in Surah Al Baqarah that you should only worship one God and there was no need to mention it in Surah Az Zukhruf but actually Surah Az Zukhruf was revealed before Surah Al Baqarah.
But for the second part of the video i dont know how to explain
appreciated man. Jazak Allah.
Prophet Muhammad whilr travelling to the heaven with Gabriel he met prophets like Musa(Moses),Ibrahim(Abraham), Isa(Jesus) peace be upon them and then this Surah revealed to Prophet s.a.w
You sound like a Quranit, they also interprete Quran like it fits to them but are not recoqnized by Sunni Muslims.
There is no such thing as revelations. There is no need for it. It's all myths.
thanks
Beautifully explained. The truth is guiding you.
Glad you think so!
Totally enjoying your content!! I love your composure when revealing these flaws!! Its Dignified and Diplomatic!!😊❤
Quran chapter 61 verse 8. They want to extinguish the light of God by uttering blasphemies. But God wills to perfect His light, however the unbelievers may dislike it.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
He is showing that allah is making a foolish request to child abuser Prophet Muhammad my dear. Answer thay
That is quite an interesting double bind you mentioned Adam. It’s great that you also mention the possible responses.
Wonderful work Brother
Islamic studies website have explained what this means and that to look what the message other Messengers brought.
If you check the current translation, it matches with the ibn masud in the sense that it means "ask those".
Thanks for the video.
It reminds me of the verse " do the non believers not see that the heavens and the earth were one entity and we (Allah) separated them" No, I think they didn't see 😂😂
The word “yara” doesn’t only mean ‘to see’ in the purely physical sense, but also rhetorically as in ‘to realize’ or ‘to consider’. That’s why even in English we can say - “I see your point”.
So before you laugh, it’s important to learn a bit about the language you’re dealing with, lest the laughter boomerangs right back to your face…
@@celestialknight2339 Yeah and if you read the verse you will realize that, whatever meaning you give to the word "yarra" still doesn't make the the verse logical. No the non believers didn't REALIZE, that the earth and the heavens were one part and God separated them. How would they REALIZE that, also because that didn't happen.
@@celestialknight2339Allah couldn’t decide if the universe was made in 6 or 8 days it doesn’t matter what yara means he is stupid 😂
@@adamyaser7136 It is asking them to realize that fact, and to consider it deeply. Because it did indeed happen - and it’s called the _Big Bang._
@@adamyaser7136of course non believers realise that as there’s no alternative to why the Big Bang happened is there 😂
Being in denial isn’t an argument.
Ex Muslim here thank you for the good debunking of the Quran
Good video, but please keep it short, or add time stamps so we can get to the point.
Action starts at 2:38
Noted! Thanks for the tip!
This verse isn't directly instructing Prophet PBUH to ask every single messenger who ever lived. When God says, "Ask the messengers" he's saying to refer to the teachings of the books sent to them and their teachings. In other words, discover the book given to the Prophets and the Sunnah.
So 'ask the messengers' = 'read their books'? 🤣Words in Islam can mean whatever you want them to mean!
The Qur'an is written by People
It is obvious in the writing of it
How can God speak in a third party..
If I were God, I would speak directly to my prophet not saying
Allah is one Worship Him.. different from what how God communicated with the Israelites....
He would say, worship no other God but me.... I am the Lord..
So from the writing of the Qur'an you see directly it's is someone else talking about God... Not God himself... Unless the Qur'an is alive.. and is speaking about it's creator
In the quran when reading its sometimes the Narrator speaking for God or Muhammad speaking for God..and sometimes God speaking.. Thats what ive seen
@@PrimeSaber. the thing is, Muslims believes that the Qur'an is directly from God.... But when you read it from the outside you see it as it is. It is written by someone who is addressing people about God.. so it's not from God. And the fact that Muslims believes that is so sad.. I don blame them,they are under a spell of Lucifer and they can't escape from that unless per Individual is strong enough to go against the masses.
But the truth is, The Qur'an is not from God as Muslims are made to bliv.. it's Human writings made and indoctrinated into peoples minds as from God and not to be rejected as that.
They will not win because The truth always wins... God always wins. And those who lie to people and those who believe the lies will be destroyed. And Peace will reign on the earth
@@PrimeSaber. the thing is, Muslims believes that the Qur'an is directly from God.... But when you read it from the outside you see it as it is. It is written by someone who is addressing people about God.. so it's not from God. And the fact that Muslims believes that is so sad.. I don blame them,they are under a spell of Lucifer and they can't escape from that unless per Individual is strong enough to go against the masses.
But the truth is, The Qur'an is not from God as Muslims are made to bliv.. it's Human writings made and indoctrinated into peoples minds as from God and not to be rejected as that.
They will not win because The truth always wins... God always wins. And those who lie to people and those who believe the lies will be destroyed. And Peace will reign on the earth
حلقة تحفة
Bro , you flattened islam !!
1. The verse isn’t necessarily literal. There’s a lot of poetry and exaggeration in the Quran. It’s possible that God doesn’t literally command the prophet to go and physically ask the prophets, rather, it for the prophet and his companions to ponder whether or not appointing Gods besides Allah is something Allah would really do. Just like if I were to tell you “the president would never attack Iraq just for oil, you could ask Saddam Hussein himself!!” I’m not literally telling you to go ask him because I know that would be nearly impossible, but im telling you to reconsider.
2. Even if God was literally commanding Muhammad to ask the prophets before him, Muhammad met other prophets including Jesus (who is well known in Islam as a person who people associated as a son to God) on a miraculous journey. It’s possible he could have been able to ask him and other prophets on this journey. I’m aware that this story comes before the verse in question, however, the verses were compiled by the sahaba and they weren’t necessarily written in the order in which they were revealed. You must also acknowledge the possibility that the verse was revealed to muhammad before he went on that journey, yet the sahaba compiled and wrote it in a different order.
3. I’ve outlined all these alternate possibilities for you and as logic follows.. If you make a certain active claim that you make to be 100% true, the second I outline an alternate possibility, it makes your claim uncertain, and not 100% true. But I commend you for your skepticism and critical thought.
The verse starts with f3al 'amr, it is litterally commanding Muhammad to ask the previous prophets
🌹🌹🌹🌹
Just read few verse before and after it to gain context.
The setting of 43:45 were talking about day of judgement, so of course every single person would be present that day.
Allah knows best
Great vídeo and content.
In Islamic tradition, there is no explicit mention of Prophet Muhammad interacting with other prophets outside of the event of Isra and Miraj in terms of direct encounters. However, there are narratives in Islamic literature where Prophet Muhammad is believed to have conversed with other prophets and messengers in various spiritual contexts, such as during his nightly prayers or in visions. These encounters often serve to emphasize the continuity and unity of the prophetic message across different times and cultures. While such interactions may not be explicitly detailed in recorded accounts, they are acknowledged within the broader framework of Islamic belief in the interconnectedness of prophethood.
So your claim on God asking the previous Prophet’s of God if they were told to worship Allah SWT.
This isn’t god saying I told you I am god now confirm with the messengers. No it’s god saying Ask the Messengers if they were told to worship just me as the people on earth do differently (perhaps) people thought or even the messenger that God ultimately made different revelations for them which isn’t the case.
When you promote critical thinking promote it right.
That's well said
Satan is every where , we must keep going
These people don't think , they just want to criticize that's all
@@adios6016 exactly brother these people keep on trying to attack but wil fail eventually we will find them and expose them intellectually!
Hypocrisy.. Why do I say that?..well most(if not all) muslims deny that Saint paul met Jesus on his way to prosecute early Christian groups..paul met Jesus in a spiritual way..so if you're saying muhammad met the other prophets before him then you should understand that paul also met Jesus..
‘Ask the Messengers: Find out from the Books brought by them. Just as the meaning of: “If there arises any dispute among you about anything, refer it to Allah and His Prophet,” is not that the dispute should be taken before Allah and His Messenger, but that one should turn to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger for a decision, so “asking the Messengers” also does not mean that one should approach all the Messengers who have left the world and ask them, but the right meaning is: Discover what teachings the Messengers of Allah have left in the world as to which of them taught that another than Allah also is worthy of worship and service.’
Ref: ‘Towards Understanding the Quran’ by Mawdudi
My ❤for ex Muslim. Humanity still exists.
اهلا انا مصري من اصل مسلم ينفع اتناقش معاك (انا لاديني )❤
طب هنتناقش ف ايه لما انت لاديني اصلاً 😊
لا كنت عاوز اسال حضرتك في سؤال انت كنت بتكلم عن المعوذتين وابن مسعود وكنت حضرتك جبت حديث شبه المعوذتين وقلت أنه لو اضفنا قل هتبقى معوذه تالته بس انا مش فاكر حضرتك قولت ده فين ممكن الحديث بعد اذنك ❤@@AdamElmasriEnglish
الخطا الأول التي قلته لا يعتبر خطأ في الحقيقة فهو عبارة عن استعارة مكنية او تصريحية (نسيت قواعد البلاغة😂) غرضها التأكيد 😊
New Subscriber here!!
Thank you may God bless you
Good job brother
Thanks
This's utterly shallow, desperate & futile way to discredit a universal Qur'an & Islam.
When this verse or the whole Qur'an was revealed, there were both Jewish & Christian scholars in Mecca, Medina & elsewhere in Hijaz & the Levant. In fact the first man who informed prophet Muhammad of his impending prophethood & being a Messenger was none other than the cousin of his first wife Kadijah who was a Christian. So prophet Muhammad's brother-in-law knew the message of Jesus, and so were many other Jewish & Christian scholars. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was a chosen human, so Allah was telling him "go and ask Christian & Jewish scholars as a witness". This verse & others also apply to all Muslims & non-Muslims. Today, we're finding the proofs from all over the world on the internet and this's the reason Islam is the fastest growing religion which will soon become the largest religion in the whole world.
Chapter 6, verse 20 in the Qur'an translates as: the Christian and Jewish scholars recognize you o Muhammad that you're a prophet and messenger of Allah, the same way that they recognize their sons".
And yet, Chapter 16, verse 43 proofs further. Basically, God treats his prophets & their would be followers as humans.
Moses asked God to show himself face to face, but then God told him "your eyes & human ability" wouldn't survive seeing me, but I'll show myself to that mountain. And when God exposed himself to the mountain, it was flattened with big boom but Moses fainted bcs of that event. When Moses woke up, he repented to God.
Basically God knows human instincts and abilities very well.
Another verse in the Qur'an translates to: if the earth was inhabited by Angels instead of humans, then God would have chosen a Messenger among them.
Grow up people. Forget about Islamophobia & the media that mislead. Pickup or order your free copy of Qur'an and read it yourself.
You don't need to know much about Islamic history early on per its own sources to realize this was a very human thing with little of the divine about it except its pretensions. Muhammad died unexpectedly without naming a successor (caliph) So much for Allah being the best of planners when he didn't even make provision for this basic thing. And what happened next was outrageous - the civil wars among the successors! Bloodthirsty and mindless affairs among those who were the so called companions of the prophet. Caliphs assassinated one after the other, Mecca and the Kaaba attacked and bombed by catapults. Murder and mayhem that went on and on. Even Muhammad's close relatives killed. Uthman the caliph who burnt all the original Korans and then compiled a new one from dubious sources was murdered - by rival Muslims before he had time to murder them! What does it all remind you of -gangster warfare or "Game of thrones' scenario. Everything in early Islam boils down to battles, caravan raids, taking loot and slaves. The Islamic heroes are all sword slashers and cut throats. Imagine for one minute if this had been the scenario following the death of Jesus. Apostle fighting apostle, disciple murdering disciple. Paul gathering a huge army and attacking Peter and John. Peter responding by assassinating his rivals. Yet in Islam we are expected to accept all this murder and mayhem as part of divine plan. Don't take us for fools!
Said well brother
May Allah Bless you 👌
@@kaloarepo288Muhammad SAW died without appointing a Caliph maybe that’s what needed to happen for Islam to thrive you don’t know what god’s plan is my friend even in today’s world the worst thing that can happen to you might even be the best thing.
Don't take us for fools my friend! Don't take us for fools! Just go away you arguments are so cringeworthy i would be ashamed even to make them in the first place! Don't take us for fools and idiots!@@zt8337
Did you watch the video or are you just spouting nonsense.
[43:45] Ask those We sent before you of Our messengers, "Have We appointed besides the Almighty other gods to be worshipped?"
By reading 43:45 on its own we would be left questioning how can prophet Muhammad ask the messengers before him when they are already dead? The words in 43:45 seem to ask the prophet to do something that cannot be done.
However, when we read 21:25, there would no longer be any confusion:
[21:25] We did not send before you any messenger without inspiring him, "There is no god except Me, so worship Me."
In 21:25, God gave the prophet the answer he would have got if he (Muhammad) had asked the messengers by himself. In other words, God is telling Muhammad that it is no longer necessary for him to ask the previous messengers when God gave you the truthful answer.
Allah says there is verse in Koran wcich is mutabisah, we say leave it and say ALLAH knows best what it means.People whose hearrt is dirty like the verse as mutabisah meant to create dispute to disbelieve the get misguided then thrown in hell because their heart is dirty for they are sinners.So Muslims will avoid falling into this trap will avoid the verse which are not clear in the meaning , when we encounter mutabisah we always say Allah knows best the meaning.
Imagine what errors we would find in the original if we had it.
None, because we currently do possess the original and it has no errors - just lots of angry people who wish to combat the truth with false arguments.
If the Qur’an was somehow radically changed for theological or political purpose, it is not the book we would expect it to be. The criticisms of the Prophet Muhammad would have been removed; the ambiguous references to Baka would have been changed to Mecca; the enigmatic verses that caused scholars to dispute would have been altered to emerge the meaning they wanted; and as even atheist Qur’anic scholars like Nicolai Sinai have noted, we would expect the Qur’an to have explicitly territorial dominion verses added to it that mentioned Persia, Rome, Jerusalem, and other places that belonged to the Muslims’ ownership - and yet no such statements exist.
The Qur’an is very much well-intact. But you guys can just keep on denying the truth until Judgement Day arrives :) Just wait. We too are waiting.
@@celestialknight2339 we don't have the original.
@@celestialknight2339link to original
We don't actually. The original copies were lost along with verses long time ago. Also people today follow hadith more than the quran so technically the word of god has been corrupted.@@celestialknight2339
According to Dr Jay Smith only 6 pages of the original texts exist today
ask those prophets who came before you ; it literally is for not muhammad its for disbelivers [ use torah and injeel which was bestowed upon prophets before muhammad ] well nice try
also muhammad cant read or write and u compare surah 43 [1] verse to other surah ; compare whole surah when u have time
and also thanks i always comfirm it and i never found an error and i never found 2 copies of quran in 20 years
Thank you
You're welcome
You'll have your chance to 'correct' Him soon. Be ready for the consequences.
May be He will be pleased to know that I “defended him” in questioning truth and logic!
If the consequences are coming from an all-knowing all-just God, who appreciate the pursuit of truth, then I’m ready for it.
@@AdamElmasriEnglish Such a cool answer and the way of thinking.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ AWESOME
Adam, do I have to learn arabic if I want to study the quran?
It helps a lot you have no idea. Most translations have smoothers and cover ups!
@@AdamElmasriEnglish thank you for replying. I read the quran twice but it was hard to understand. Best I found your channel. May I ask what quran online version should I turn to when you recommend some verses to look up?
So we learn from this verse that ouija boards (with Arabic letters) were available 1400 years ago.
And ask those We sent before you of Our messengers .... does not mean to ask the messengers, rather it means to refer to the books these messengers were given. For example, in sura Nisaa ayah 59, Allah says "O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day". Here "refer it to Allah and the messenger" does not mean referring literally to Allah and his messenger but rather referring to the Book of Allah (ie The Quran) and the Sunnah of the Prophet.
The other point I would like to make is this. Are you more knowledgeable in Arabic than the Arabs during the time of the Prophet? Do you know more about the Torah than the Jews of Madina during the time of the Prophet? Surprisingly neither the Arabs nor the Jews at that time raised any issue on the meaning of this ayat. They understood this ayat perfectly.
Subhanallah ❤❤
it would be great if you also share the links of muslim sources like islamqa you mentioned
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 7:42
Regarding forging, I was reminded of S 10:37 "And *this* quran was not to be fabricated *instead of Allah..."* Only Allah could fabricate that particular quran?
The Arabic language is a reasonably flexible language and a single word cannot always be pigeonholed into a single meaning. Regarding the word ‘to forge’ (yuftarā’) - it can indeed mean to forge, but also more generally means ‘to devise’ or ‘to make up’. Even in English, I can say “Okay class, now get out your pencils and make up your own poems.” - I am not asking the students to fabricate in the sense of deception, but to use their creativity to generate a poem.
Likewise, I can say “You just made that story up!” to confront someone of their lie. So using the exact same phrase, we see it can have a radically different meaning depending on context. This is why the word “makeup” in English means the beauty products used by woman - we are not accusing them of forging anything; it’s just how language developed. And even the term “fabrication” itself can also refer to the skilled trade that involves assembling parts into products.
So how can you possibly ignore & turn willfully blind to such clear-cut diversity of semantics within the English language, yet refuse to afford the same flexibility to the Classical Arabic tongue, let alone in a highly poetic and rhetorical book (the Qur’an)? Let’s do better than that.
@@celestialknight2339 My post, Fabrication
S 10:37 And this quran was not to be fabricated instead of Allah but is a confirmation of that in front of it and an analysis of the Book. There is no doubt concerning it, from the lord of the ‘alamin.
S 10:38 Or do they say: He has fabricated it? Say: Bring a surah the like of it and invoke whom you can instead of Allah if you are truthful.
S 11:13 Or they say: He has fabricated it. Say: Then bring ten surahs the like of it, fabricated, and invoke whom you can instead of Allah if you are truthful.
S 11:35 Or do they say: He has fabricated it? Say: If I have fabricated it then upon me is my guilt and I am innocent of what you incriminate.
S 21:5 Rather, they have said: Medleys of dreams. Rather, he has fabricated it. Rather, he is a poet. So let him bring us a sign as was sent the first ones.
S 25:4 And those who have disbelieved have said: This is nothing but vilification. He has fabricated it and other people have helped him. But they have come as a wrong and an untruth.
S 32:3 Or do they say: He has fabricated it? Rather, it is the truth from your lord that you may warn a people whom no nadhir has come to before you; perhaps they will be guided.
S 46:8 Or they say: He has fabricated it. Say: If I have fabricated it then you are not able for me against Allah at all. He is a knower of what you pour out concerning it. Sufficient was he as a witness between me and you and he is the forgiver, the merciful.
The author was accused of fabricating his work but it would seem that the author was saying that only Allah could fabricate it.
iftara. افترى Definition from a dictionary:
to make up, to fabricate, to invent افترى - Wiktionary
The Christian Prince is well versed in Arabic
Weldone.
Seriously this is the best example of “Not the eyes that are blind but the heart”. We muslim read the surah that the video maker mention yet Alhamdulillah we understand the true meaning. Meanwhile the video maker made assumptions by himself, ofcourse its his video. For all non muslim who read my comments, don’t immediately believe him. Never stop educate yourself, check by yourself, reading Al Quran by yourself words by words. If you don’t understand ask your muslim friend or seikh not ex muslim, because the answer will 100% wrong.
thank you for your critical thinking, however I still feel as if this surah is not illogical, mainly because the quran isnt written in the order of the revelations, surah az zukhruf was actually revealed earlier than surah al baqarah was and we dont know how communication between Mohammed (pbuh) and Allah (swt) took place, maybe he was really given the opportunity to ask the other prophets and its just beyond of what we can understand. Indeed its truly not your eyes that are blind, its your heart. Please dont ignore this comment and please prove me wrong if you can, since I am surely not all knowing and want to know more.
Thank you for your comment, honesty and respect.
Your words “..maybe he was really given the opportunity to ask the other prophets and it’s just beyond of what we can understand” - here are my thoughts around this:
1- The Quran is supposed to be a clear message for humanity that we can understand. If we accept something as true, just because - maybe - it’s beyond our understanding, that would open the door to accept anything we cannot verify as truth. We will continue to say “maybe we don’t understand”.
Well, if we cannot understand a message and verify news that were intended for humanity at large, then may be we shouldn’t blindly trust it!
2- As I mentioned, the verse was found to be problematic since early time. Even the earliest Muslim scholars found it to be nonsensical and tried to come up with many explanations. That is something not to be ignored!
3- Surat Al-Baqara’s timing is not really of a strong relevance to the argument. It was merely a side point (to support all other evidences presented in the video). But really, it is Surat Al-Israa (specifically the verses concerning the story of the Israa journey) and Surat Al-Zukhruf’s timing that matter to the argument. The timing of these two have been verified and the israa journey - allegedly- took place before Surat Al-Zukhruf.
With a little bit of commonsense, one can understand that the Koran is a manmade book , edited as required and written according to the understanding of the world at that time.
Another reason the verse was not a command in the literal sense to go ask the Prophets..when I tell you something you don’t believe I tell you to go ask so and so if you don’t believe it…this is Allah the creator of the heavens and the earth ..are you not gonna believe him and go ask the Prophets if it’s true?
. واسأل الذين أرسلنا إليهم قبلك رسلنا " ، ومعنى الأمر بالسؤال التقرير لمشركي قريش أنه لم يأت رسول ولا كتاب بعبادة غير الله - عز وجل
Very easy explanation from Tafsir Baghawi
Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it's illogical
I subscribed and I made a comment for pleasing the Dark God of algorithms. You're doing a great job.
Thanks bro
My understanding is that Quran is Waraqah ibn Nawal the Zoroaster monk who created and wrote the book included verses of Muhammad rules. This book was mainly to support Muhammad's goals became the most powerful man on earth and heaven. The power on earth subjected to surpass King Solomon and in Heaven to surpass Jesus. 😃😃The written book was turned into traditional MEMORIZEN LANGUAGE in regard to apply those in the illiterate communities.
The Quran was reveal in bit by bit. Some of verse came before the others
Agreed.
But I talked specifically about the parts of Sura that I’m concerned about!
And some are so obviously made up that an intelligent person should doubt the whole Qaran.
I don't think this is actually problematic. I think it's just a rhetorical question. It's not really a command to ask. It's for emphasis. The muddy spring verse is more troubling for me. Or the fact that Pharoah is used as a name and not a title.
If Allah could protect the Quran, why he couldn't protect the Bible his book?
Is there any reason he didn’t protect his others books?
YOUR VIDEO HELPED ME TO PROPERLY USE QURAN IN MY RESTROOM 😂😂😂
alright lil buddy, we got it. you just need some attention from muslims
@@smirtuar
A disgusting comment, worthy of a worthless superstition.
You should only use proper toilet paper. The Qaran will just block your sewage.
1.Prophet Muhammad while travelling to the heaven with Gabriel he met prophets like Musa(Moses),Ibrahim(Abraham), Isa(Jesus) peace be upon them and then this Surah revealed to Prophet s.a.w
So half-knowledge is very dangerous😂
I would say: Not to use your brain and instead accept the insanity of religion is very dangerous.
If we accept the interpretation of " ask the people who have prophets like Cristians and Jews" we will still have problem. Christians accept Jesus and Meryem gods according to quran. So quran shows wrong witnesses, christains will testify against qurans question of "did we appoint gods beside Allah?", and Christians will say "yes, Jesus is a god beside Allah". What a smart god!
*نصف المعرفة أكثر خطورة من الجهل*
Is It True in Holy Bible 1Timothy 2:11. It Mentioned "LET A WOMEN LEARN IN SILENCE WITH FULL SUBMISSION. I PERMIT NO WOMEN TO HAVE AUTHORITY OVER MAN. SHE IS TO KEEP SILENT.?????🙏🙏
It is probably a rhetorical question, meant to emphasize God's oneness.
My boyfriend is a muslim and hence i had to consider looking into Islam. And the Surah Al Baqarah itself was enough to give me a big no no😂😂
Now i'm trying my level best to make him realise how he has turned into a sheep following the herd blindly 💀
Thank God! I found your channel at the right time. I have always been a seeker my whole life and will always be. These religions of world only serve me one purpose; entertainment 😂😂😂
Love from India🙏🏻💙
Thank you so much for your comment. I really appreciate the personal insight. Good luck with your BF situation. Religious brain washing has a very powerful grip!
Isolation and indoctrination is not healthy look what happened to the people of Gaza because of Hamas UNRWA and Palestinian Authority they are stuck in 1948 as generational refugees of a war that they started
Man is man. Christian apologists do the exact same thing. If someone wants to believe in something without question, they will look for any possible way to excuse that which is wrong about it.
With the Christian Bible, I can point to the fact that Jesus said many laws in the Hebrew scriptures were not from God but were from men. I can also show that Paul said things that went against the teachings of Jesus.
Yet, there are many "Christians" (note the quotation marks) who will ignore what Jesus taught in order to follow their hateful, greedy, selfish beliefs even though Jesus taught that God is love and that we are all to love and help each other.
God bless you.
islam is universal religion but yiu must read it in Arabic pray in Arabic o be universal..😮
Islam is a miracle..
Islam is nonsense.
Sorry, Adam how did you conclude that Isra journey had already taken place before the 43:45 was revealed? Maybe i missed something
he used logic, and SIN (Standard Islamic Narrative)
@@mistmurth What narrative? what logic? Where did he present it?
@@worldscitizen8579 In Islamic tradition, there is no explicit mention of Prophet Muhammad interacting with other prophets outside of the event of Isra and Miraj in terms of direct encounters. However, there are narratives in Islamic literature where Prophet Muhammad is believed to have conversed with other prophets and messengers in various spiritual contexts, such as during his nightly prayers or in visions. These encounters often serve to emphasize the continuity and unity of the prophetic message across different times and cultures. While such interactions may not be explicitly detailed in recorded accounts, they are acknowledged within the broader framework of Islamic belief in the interconnectedness of prophethood.
So your claim on God asking the previous Prophet’s of God if they were told to worship Allah SWT.
This isn’t god saying I told you I am god now confirm with the messengers. No it’s god saying Ask the Messengers if they were told to worship just me as the people on earth do differently (perhaps) people thought or even the messenger that God ultimately made different revelations for them which isn’t the case.
So even if the journey took place afterwards his claim still can’t be labeled as illogical.
@@worldscitizen8579 obviously you do not know what logic is, let me help you out here, in this specific case the logic is implied, it's not direct, it's there and you need to detect it, and you can do that with an in-depth knowledge of the subject matter and how logic relates to it.
@@mistmurth oh, i see now. I forgot that in sura 17 there is an ayat confirming The journey had already taken place
X muslim.....I agree
i’m not convinced so strongly like you that this is a mistake. Obviously it must’ve made sense to the people at the time because otherwise the profit would have realized it made no sense and perhaps modified it through abrogation or something like that so there must’ve been an understood meaning. Perhaps it is a form of expression or a rhetorical way of asking. It seems like a very small issue to me if anything. another possible meeting for messengers could be the angels also. And obviously the prophet has access to angels if islam is true and he could’ve asked Gabriel and anyone else.
A Qiraat:
"And ask those to whom We sent Our messengers before you.”
The meaning of the command to ask is to inform the polytheists of Quraysh that no messenger or book came to worship anyone other than God - the Almighty.
Very easy explanation from Tafsir Baghawi
his misunderstanding is just illogical
Islam is real life ☪️ancer....
Tnx for another great video
Thanks for watching!
that's what happen when it is not the word of god..
❤🙏👍✔
very interesting question dear, ok get answer of it, if i will says it to my mullahs in sub continent they will make fatwa of blasphemy and shall kill me, but the word prophet means the messengers of Lord, it is not necessary that the messengers called by Lord is only a human, in surah hud Lord use word prophet for angels who were sent to abraham. now come to the point there are two words used in Quran "nabi" and "rasool" . nabi means which is sent message by Lord by "wahi" electric signals or by angels. and rasool could be anyone who took the message of Allah. here is a point that before prophet Muhammad there was no man on the true religion? there were so many priest and rabbi who were not polytheists and were workers of Lord and were preaching the Lord's holy scriptures. so in this verse the word prophet used for those who were preaching. and there is no word worship in any religion, did Lord made created us to bent down infront of Him, if this was needed then the angels were enough, Lord says in Quran we have created humans and Jinns for our slavery(working). the word عبد use to misinterpret by scholars its original meaning is workers/slaves
And yet, tens of thousands every year convert (revert) to Islam. Most people who converted are young (27 yo) successful ladies. Thanks Allah
What is your argument?
Yes, ignorance exists.. even among young successful women!
@@AdamElmasriEnglish your argument is so illogical, the verse was confirming it
it's like telling someone "Didn't i tell you to do blah blah"? that is one of the weakest arguments i've ever heard.
The stupid never die out.
@@smirtuarhe’s a hypocrite for sure but also he’s doing this for the money he gets to lie about truth. We had this kind of soulless individual before in the history of mankind, they will come and perish like insects but truth will last forever. Let him enjoy his one and only chance of the test, only the believer will get the fruitful result of the test. Let the dog bark as he wants.
@@sifat1730 i genuinely went through A LOT of this guy's videos, they're full of illogical arguments that even non muslims would be confused about, just like you said, all he does is bark so the other dogs bark with him.
so many fake ex muslims in his comment section run away when you try to ask them any simple question about islam
Since the Quran was revealed
in Arabic language so take the
Arabic language meanings not
the Persian language.rasool does not mean messenger in Arabic language means message 😮
Wrong!
In Arabic:
Resalah = message
Rasool = Messege bearer (messenger)
We must to Leave islam to save the world
Muham-mad was illiterate and he got caught lying😂😂
Countless times!
I just researched what you said and I've got an important note, first of all, you can't say that a whole chapter was revealed before or after an event such as the journy of israa and al-miraaj, this exposed to me your ignorance about the holy Quran.
How could you criticise the quran while you don't even know that the verses in the Quran were not revealed in order!? Let alone entire Surahs
Thank you for your comment and notes!
I am well aware of what you mentioned, however, for your knowledge, if you look up the order of revelation of any Sura, you will find that the majority of a Sura is usually revealed around the same time with some verses being the exception.
That said, when a good chunk of a Sura that talks about a single topic is written/revealed (e.g israa journey), that chunk of verses all belongs to the same time slot.
My argument wasn’t as ignorant as you think. I urge you to go and check the revelation times of the specific two items (verses/chunks of Sura) mentioned in my video and verify that for yourself.
Bottom line, the israa journey took place prior to the time of Surat Az-Zukhruf (the specific problematic verse)
@@AdamElmasriEnglish when was it exactly revealed then ? According to several sources it was revealed in last few years prior to the hijrah and the israa wa al-miraaj happened around that same time ( scholars suggested it was one year before the hijrah ) so the verse and the journy happened around the same time
Without lies, Islam dies.
Without lies, religion dies.
Without lies, Islamophobia dies
Keep up the good work Egyptian Adam.
So, this particular god tells you to ask others about him? How silly is that?
Allhah looks like when he doubts his word when he spoke to the prophets... so Allah looks like an uncertain God before Muhamed
Jesus Christ is returning to throw the Mahdi and Isa into the lake of fire
You are crapping actually.
You could not even prove the existence of Jesus.
Bruh in Quran and EVEN in the Bible says Isa ibn mariam
(Jesus the son of merry) Has Died and Death People Do not Return from the Grave Exept on the Day Of Judgement where EVERY person Will be Resurected FROM THE Death
Also to mention the Conversation that the brother in the video is talking about is on the Day Of Judgement HOW READ THE CONTEXT Not Just One Specific verse alone, this can lead people to Confusion
@@ayhanuzun4821 you’re forgetting one major point….
THE KORAN IS FROM THE SHAYTAN
THE KORAN IS FROM THE SHAYTAN
THE KORAN IS FROM THE SHAYTAN
DAJJAAAAAALLHU AKBAR
DAJJAAAAAALLHU AKBAR
DAJJAAAAAALLHU AKBAR