United Airlines B767 DRAMATIC TOUCH AND GO at Zurich Airport
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
- Plane Spotting at Zurich Airport showing a dramatic touch and go (aborted landing) of an United Airlines Boeing 767. It was no crosswind, therefore I assume the spoilers didn't deploy or deploy to late, therefore the plane did bouncing after landing and the plane got incredible sloping wings. As the runway got closer and close the pilot pull down the nose to get speed for take off again.
The 2nd part of the video shows the appropriate landing in the second try.
0:00 Touch and Go
1:11 Landing
Aircraft: Boeing 767-322(ER)
Airline: United Airlines
Registration: N654UA
Callsign: UA52
Flight Route: Washington (IAD) - Zurich (ZRH)
Date: 30.05.2024
© This video is property of zrhaircraft and may not be reused without permission! If you wish to use some of my content, please write it in the comments. - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Thx a lot for watching my video! Make sure to click the LIKE button and SUBSCRIBE to keep up to date. If you want to support my content additionally, leave a SUPER THANKS. Your support is highly appreciated!
If this is the flight that arrived on the morning of May 30th, I was on this flight. It was a disconcerting, uncomfortable moment, but the passengers were quiet and calm. I was taking deep breaths so as not to get sick. It was clear that we were running out of runway, so the takeoff was a relief. A few passengers clapped when we did land, but I was just glad to be on the ground unharmed. Interestingly, the pilot informed us that the tower had requested that we "circle around" again. Thanks for filming and sharing this. It is very interesting to see this event from outside the plane.
Yes it was this flight and nice to hear that nothing happened to the passengers and crew
Id have told tower unable. No thanks. Not at that point.
I think the circle around excuse is complete BS. But hey it sounds good!
@@p51pilot28 the crew alone decide on a go-around. Then they tell the tower, and they are guided by radar vectors to try again.
Yeah, the tower request to “circle around” is complete BS for sure, nice excuse from the pilots, and this is coming from someone that knows a thing or two about ATC, glad that they landed safely afterwards!
Flare slightly early. No ground spoilers. Then pilot induced oscillation. Go around initiation somewhat late but definitely the correct decision.
About flares and spoilers we had already a discussion yesterday evening, there it was well explained in german, so you share the same opinion. The go around was surely the right decision, it was not much space left on the runway, pretty sure it was to late to stop this huge plan in time on the runway
Airframe got totally upset due to spoilers not being deployed. I am no expert on B767, but it might be related to insufficient weight on wheels.
Or they didnt arm the spoilers.
@@p51pilot28or the AUTO-SPEEDBRAKES were INOP. Subsequently deployed manually.
no spoilers armed is what got them
Fantastic footage of this touch-and-go and landing, what an awesome spotting location!
Thx a lot, was really luck to be at the right time at the right place, normally I expected to get a nice waterspray landing and then this happens :) Soon I will upload a video from that day with impressive waterspray landings from A330 and B777
Tailstrike - just miss
Wingstrike - juat miss
Running out of runway - just miss
Bouncy ball play - check
Only thing they didnt do was initiating reverse thrust too soon.
Tail, within inches. Wing, nowhere close. Those wings are somewhat typical of a normal landing in PHX or LAS in Summer. 😁
The 757,767 spoilers are a bit tricky to arm. Just this week, my FO didn’t arm them correctly and upon landing called out, no spoilers.
So as the Captain and Pilot flying in this case, I had to grab the handle and extend them manually.
Not a big deal since I was firmly on the ground and it wasn’t a big distraction.
They had other control issues going on in this case. It appears like they stopped flying the aircraft and possible PIO.
The delay to hit the GA switch and fly the Aircraft had my pucker factor pegged! Glad they finally rectified the situation and landed safely.
😬
Great to have an explanation from a pilot, that is what i was hoping for in the discussions of that video :)
Please don't say "they delayed to hit the GA switch". That just perpetuates the whole AP/BS thing. A GA should be flown by the PF. FLOWN. Not observed. There are reasons why they are FLOWN in training. A successful GA does not need a SWITCH. See Emirates 777 crash in Dubai for more info.
Too much up elevator during the flare?
15 years in the left seat and I never had a problem arming the spoilers.
They're tricky all right. You need to move the lever about an inch into a detent. ;)
You absolutely so have one of the best spotting channels
thx a lot for these nice words
Amazing capture. Based on the reference in the video he had all the wheels on the ground at the other runway intersection ( so less than 800mt remaining ). Probably he rotated with less than 100mt of runway remaining. Amazing!
amazing - that he made it at all. This is not a runway for stunts like this.
Wow what a CATCH!
They decided to Go Around a bit late as they had to put down the aircraft and use the entire remaining runway to get up to speed again. Thats pretty rare!
Thank you. To catch this video so close and nice sharpe quality is really rare, even so rare that my video was shown yesterday evening in RTL aktuell news, incredible :)
@@zrhaircraft Amazing video sir. Congratulations! I have a question for you. Can you recall from the morning of the incident if you heard the thrust reversers deploy on the initial landing. From your video, it appears that they deployed the thrust reversers before they elected to go around. We can see moisture being blown off the runway from, what looks like reverse thrust. If this is the case, most operators prohibit go arounds after reverse thrust is deployed. This could have ended very badly for this flight. Again, amazing capture.
Lots to learn from with this video. Great catch. Looks like classic pilot induced oscillation.
thank you, that was also my thinking about what to learn within the video and therefore i am happy to have different opinions and discussions here
What the hell!!! Those 76’s are difficult to land in some occasions! What a fantastic footage, they decided quite late to apply full thrust, easily seen by the engines black smoke! Amazing! Superb capture!
Thank you Mike, I also thought that they should speed up earlier, pros/cons decision to be done within 2-3 seconds probably
What makes them "difficult to land in some occasions"? Why? This looked pretty tame to me.
Well, not "difficult" at all to land a B767.
Retired pilot here, plenty of hours flying them.
Also, no, modern turbofan engines don't produce black smoke. You saw some water kicked up by the exhaust thrust.
What an absolute insane capture!! 😳 Never seen something like this before. Awesome work, thanks for sharing!
thank you, i was also totally suprised what happend in front of my lense, never saw something similiar before
The pilots did it right. The camera lens makes the runway shorter than it actually is.
that surely true, but this runway in ZRH is pretty short and it was around 500m left more or less
I’ve never been to Zurich, but from what I can tell:
It’s Runway 28.
Runway 28 has precision approach markings and approach lights.
That means there is a precision approach to that runway with glide slope guidance.
That said, it looks as though it is perhaps a steeper than 3 degree glideslope to that runway? It looks like higher terrain out there on the approach?
Higher glide path angle means potential to carry higher airspeeds - which will cause you to float during the flare.
The first landing looked to me that he/she touched down past the touchdown zone markings.
He/she planted it on the runway which was the right thing to do. Then, to me, it looks like they attempted to plant the nose gear as well. From there, he/she got themselves into a PIO by over- correcting with a pitch-up input.
At some point, the pilot induced a roll as well
It looks to me like the Captain decided to go-around. At the :36 second mark, The captain applied power on the engines, and it’s possible that the engines spooled up asymmetrically which caused the nose to yaw. The captain dumped the nose to get some airspeed and regain some flight control authority.
Luckliy, they were fairly light and Zurich is a low altitude airport(1400’) so they were able to get away with going around with the flaps fully deployed.
.
Wow das ist unglaublich, noch nie so etwas gesehen 😳
Danke Dir, ist mir vorher auch noch nie passiert, hatte in ZRH in den letzten Wochen 2x Glück, einmal mit dem Edelweiss A340 und nun dieses mal, darf gerne so weiter gehen :)
ich auch nicht. Haarscharf.
Oh, das muss ein komisches Gefühl für die Insassen gewesen sein.
Wunderbare Filmaufnahme, besten Dank 🙌
Danke für das Lob wegen der Filmaufnahme. Ich hoffe das alle Insassen unverletzt rausgekommen sind und deswegen keine Angst vor dem Fliegen bekommen haben, hauptsache es ist hoffentlich nichts passiert
Danke für dieses fantastische Video 👍
Vielen Dank für die Spende
Super gefilmt wow
Vielen Dank
They side loaded the plane. They’re crabbing into a right crosswind. Before touchdown they put left rudder in to straighten the plane. However, they never put right aileron in. Instead of the right wing going down, the left wing goes down and they start drifting to the left. Then they touch down still drifting left causing the side load. Instead of the right main gear touching down first the left main gear touches down first. If they did that in a tailwheel airplane they would have ground looped it.
Holy crap, that was freaky!
Good Leads the Way!!
That is insane!! Brilliant footage!!!
Thx a lot for the compliment
@@zrhaircraftWhich runway is this?
@@heartfeltteaching It is runway 28
@@zrhaircraft Thanks! I was looking at the airport runways on Google Maps and couldn’t figure it out because the runway in the video looks different to 28 as it appears in the map.
@@heartfeltteaching probably cause by using 600mm lense for capturing
Wow da fehlte nicht mehr viel bis zum Tailstrike🙈 Interessante Aufnahmen, Daumen hoch👍😉
Danke für das Kompliment, beim Filmen fand ich es noch cool sowas mal live zu sehen, im Nachhinein einfach nur froh, das nichts passiert ist
In der Regel wird das durchstarten früher eingeleitet. Das hat mich schon gewundert. Sieht man bei den britischen Sturmvideos sehr oft. Hätte das späte Manöver wahrscheinlich verhindert.
Kostet aber halt auch zeit, ein neuer Anflug. Da will man vllt schnell runter.
Es gibt Kriterien für einen stabilen Anflug, wenn die nicht mehr erfüllt sind, ist ein "go-around" nicht optional. Der Pilot Monitoring wird das zur Not feststellen und einleiten. Natürlich ist ein high energy go-around früh besser, aber hier schien alles ganz O.K., ich vermute nur zu viel Airspeed, daher leichter bounce. Die Perspektive und lange Brennweite verzerren allerdings das Geschehen auch ordentlich. Alles safe.
@@BlueSideUp Danke. Dürfte ich nocht Ihren Hintergrund erfahren. Das ist immer sehr interessant. Das Netz ist ja doch auch voll von vielen "Experten". Daher ist es immer gut, dass auch Experten ihre Antworten steuern.
@@jeromez.2672 ich bin Privatpilot für Helikopter und Flächenflugzeuge, Besitzer einer Cirrus. Viel meines recurring trainings und einen Teil meiner Ausbildung haben Airline Piloten geleistet und tun das weiterhin. Ein paar Stunden im 747-8 Simulator der LFT in EDDF sind allerdings alles, was mit den größeren Vögeln hands on zu tun hat. Die Regeln für einen stabilen Anflug sind allerdings ziemlich identisch, nur dass Privatpiloten leider stärker dazu neigen, instabile Anflüge noch "retten" zu wollen, aus falschem Scham oder um Gebühren zu sparen oder, oder. Daher sind die Regeln im Airliner klarer und das CRM verteilt die Verantwortung auf beide Piloten.
Wow great footage!!
That plane roared at around 240 kilometers per hour down that short runway, and only after 15 seconds after its first contact it had all tires on the ground - so about 1.00 to 1.250 kilometers of runway have already passed!! That is insane!! Moreover, that runway is wet and it is only 2500 metres long, the shortest in Zurich. Credits to the pilots!
Thx for the compliment about the video. I went to this spotter place to make nice waterspray landings on this wet runway and then this touch an go happened. This video shows a very good reason, why 2 runways at Zurich needs to be extended.
Absolutely, they should be extended. Hope the voters got that message. Where is that spotter location? Is it accessible for anyone?
@@maurob0 yes it is, in rümlang next to runway end
a good thing here was that fuel weight was almost nil, so the plane could climb out steeply. There are buildings not too far from the end.
WOW WOW...greetings from the Caribbean island of St. Kitts...that was a rare and awesome catch :)
thx for the compliment, greeting back from switzerland
Amazing capture
thank you
Hmm… the landing gear works excelent!!! Amazing!!
Landing spoilers unarmed, and did not deploy.
The spoilers won't deploy even if they were armed if the thrust levers are out of idle or the gear is still tilted. If you look closely the spoilers look too be deployed it is just hard to see because their pitch is far too nose high. Dangerously close to tail strike.
Man man man,das sieht man selten.Super Aufnahme und gut,dass nichts passiert ist
Danke Dir, kannst Dir vorstellen das es mir beim Filmen auch etwas mulmig wurde als das Flugzeug immer näher kam
Now, that actually deserves passengers' clapping after landing.
0:33 😮
Nice capturing 😍
Thx a lot
What an awesome video man!
Thx a lot
Fantastic!
Thank You
Super Aufnahme! Zur richtigen Zeit am richtigen Spotting Platz 😃👍
Besten Dank, ja da hatte ich wirklich Glück gehabt :)
und dann noch im Dauerregen!
Super Video! Wow dieses Durchstartmanöver ist krass.
Danke Dir, ja ist wirklich krass, Und das ich dies so nah vor die Linse bekommen haben ist der Hammer
@@zrhaircraft Züri-News würde den Vid sicher auch gern zeigen. Hast du schon gefragt?
@@PeterNGloor Nein habe dort nicht angefragt, viele sind dirkt auf uns zugekommen, die mail adresse steht im kanal drin, aber guter punkt, müsste mal schauen auf diese loszugehen
Such a perfectly smooth approach and landing and suddenly this oscillation sets in. Strange 🤨
Cool capture! May I feature this late go around in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. All the best to you!
Thx for the compliment. Lets discuss this via my mail address in my profile or via instagram please.
I’ve never seen an on the ground - non-landing like this before.
Truly quite something to see.
A lot of unusual things are happening in a short time here.
I suspect your video might be used for training purposes in the future .
Have you offered it to United Airlines Flight Crew Training Dept yet ?
Bravo on the filming 👏
Thank you, lets see if someone from UA Training Dept will contact me :)
@@zrhaircraft hoffentlich. Und dir auch einen Batzen dafür zahlen.
Maybe you should promote yourself And write to them Tell them that you have an interesting video they might wish to use for training purposes.
الحمد لله على السلامة
If you look closely 0:34 , before they did the go-around, they did use the thrust reversers. Boeing says after the reverse thrust is used, a full stop landing must be made.
Zurich ATC to United pilot: "er.. Do you know Swiss hotels' prices by any chance?"
United pilot: *(abort landing)* *(fly back to Washington)*
I think the perspective does not allow to judge how much runway was left. For sure PIO but no spoilers are simply the result of not enough pressure on the main gear - that’s not a mistake.
After the initial two bounces somebody called a go around which resulted in a super high AoA - however the aircraft had already lost too much speed and was probably really slow. It’s visible that they applied toga thrust in this situation which did not result in lift - one can easily lose situational awareness in this situation. Potentially controls where changed then (for me it looks as if the captain said „my controls“ as he realised the unfortunate situation), the nose was pushed down, the aircraft accelerated and rotated again.
I would love to have been in the jump seat to observe this, or, correction, I would love to see a video showing both pilots and their conversation. Without that, it is difficult to pass judgment. If the spoilers don't auto-deploy, the pilot flying can deploy them or call "SPOILERS!" If I had been in the jumpseat, it would have bothered me to watch and be unable to do anything!
The first attempt? Poor airmanship. I also thought I saw the reversers deploy, you can see the water kicking up. We are trained to never go around once you actuvate the reversers...
But I'm guessing the Captain decided insufficient runway remaining after all of the porpoising. So, break the "rule" and prevent a runway overrun. Good call. They will have some explaining to do with the Chief Pilot back at base
Good call for sure. If it’s for safety you may break the rules yes with explanation at the end but sometimes common sense may save you from crash
as the tower usually says: I have a phone number you have to call..
You thought, you saw reversers deploy. But zoom in pls and compare to other videos same ac type same spot. I think they weren‘t.
@@waldfritz1 Off course the weren't. Nobody does that.
@@waldfritz1 The water vapor coming off the runway is a very troubling indication that they did deploy TR's. Once the pilot did this the speed brakes would have deployed which made things worse as far as nose up pitch. As the initial poster stated, the go around was probably warranted. It looks as though they a couple hundred meters of pavement left. If I had to guess the First Officer really had a bad day at the office.
Pilot: I have no time to pick up or drop off passengers, I must get to Istanbul.
Apparently from other comments, there didn't seem to be any unusual wind or service issues. I wonder as this was an overnight flight, if either of the pilots, especially the PF was a little 'off'.
it was an overnight flight.
There was most likely 3 pilots as this flight originated from Dulles.
Bravo!
Danke Dir
Wowwww, almost a Acident!!
yes, there could have been a tailstreak or crash end of runway, but the chances for tailstreak was much higher compared to a runway issue
nice catch
thank you
Full TR done... Three touches, one go around and one full stop landing.. Check 😊
Nice catch
Thx
Hello, thank you for this beautiful video. Greetings from Turkey 💯👏👏🔔👍
Hi, thank you for the warm words. Greetings from Switzerland 👍
No ground spoilers and no reverseers deployed. Good call to go around.
yes correct, that was also our assumption
Why no ground spoilers or reverseers deployed?🤔😮
Klasse Fang Raphael liked
Danke dir Marlies
Landing checklist : landing gear … down 3 greens… down 3 greens , flaps 25… flaps 25 landing checklist complete 😅😅 ummm what happened to the spoilers? 😅
You don't fly a 67.
The PIC reaction time was at the best slow.
Incredible catch.. any pilots here? Just from the bouncing behavior and from looking closely to the wings after touchdown it looks like the spoilers didn't deploy. A bit difficult to judge due to the pitch angle but 767 spoilers usually deploy quite quickly, especially compared to the Airbus A330 for example.
Would be great to have a nice discussion what happened during the landing
The left-right rocking looked like a PIO to me, pilot induced oscillation. Correction inputs in the wrong phase exacerbate the problem. No view of the control surfaces to confirm this. Re spoilers: It's possible that these require both main gears loaded, which they never saw at the beginning. At 0:35 you see them deployed on the port wing.
@@HotelPapa100 actually you can see them on both wings...
@@ezb77 Yep. I just could not concentrate on both at the same time.
@@HotelPapa100 I know the problem
Wow wie Episch war das denn bitte
Besten Dank für das Lob
Važno je da ste svi živi I zdravi❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Uiiii uiii uiii, da ging aber mal was richtig schief. Krasse film aufnahmen 😮
Danke für das Lob, war zur richtigen Zeit am richtigen Ort, noch nie sowas selbst gesehen
Sieht aus, als wären bei der ersten Landung die Spoilers nicht ausgefahren, oder?
@@NoName-jl7gs ja genau, deshalb ist der flieger auch so am hüpfen, vermutlich gingen die nicht automatisch raus und erst anschliessend manuell, da war es dann wohl schon zu spät
@@zrhaircraft Dann tippe ich darauf, dass die Piloten die Spoilers nicht richtig gearmed haben. Menschlich, kann passieren…
@@NoName-jl7gs das ist möglich, mal schauen ob es irgendwann mal eine offizielle Begründung dafür gibt
Quadruple bounce, PIO, no ground spoilers, and a go-around after reverser deployment…highly abnormal and highly unsafe…glad it all worked out tho
agree, we are all happy that nothing happened...and you can imgaine how nervous i got, when this plane came closer and closer to me
Zur richtigen Zeit am richtigen Ort würde ich sagen 💪👍
Ja das stimmt, hatte mich eigentlich auf Waterspray Landing eingestellt und dann passiert so was cooles :)
Help me !!!!! 😱😱😱😱😱 👏👏👏👏👏al pilota ! 🇮🇹
Yo! ZRH Aircraft! Good video, BUT have you considered posting the MET report at the time of landing? Note the wet runway and dark clouds overhead. Thanks! (Retired -767 captain here; 18,000 hours total time.) Cheers.
That was awesome 🔥👍
Yes indeed
Klasse Video 😍😍
Danke dir
Das üben wir noch einmal
My goodness, they are so lucky!
Oh yes, I dont want to know how the passengers feels inside the plane, probably they dont want to fly soon again
@@zrhaircraft I am sure all those US citizens will have a booking for the return flight, which cannot be changed or cancelled.
Wow, krass 😯
Ja, allerdings :)
Anyone know the balked/rejected landing procedure for the 757/767? For most jets you maintain landing/level pitch until reaching vref THEN pitch up for a Go Around.
Looks like here they initiated a go around but started pitching before the aircraft was ready to fly
They had no choice. No more runway left, lol.
WOW!
thx
1. No spoilers
2. PIO
Question: I fly the 777 and there is a clear indication on EICAS and checklist when the speedbrake is armed. Is there also an indication in the 767 cockpit?
No indication. Poor design carried over from older aircraft.
Hello, may I use some of the footage to explain to my audience what happened? I have an arabian aviation channel , obviously I'll give full credit to your channel
Excellent footage by the way!
Hi, thx for the compliment, please contact me via my mail address or instagram
Hello, I can't find your email, and your insta will not allow me to message you unless you also follow me 💜
@@MurexHyena my mail: zrhaircraft@gmail.com
How far down the runway did they get before they got airborne again?
Из ничего сделать проблему надо умудриться!!!
That is one short landing strip!
it is not soo terrible, it is 2500m, even the a380 lands often there in the evening
Sehr sehr cooles Video mach weiter so
Danke Dir, hatte wirklich prima gepasst
@@zrhaircraft Bitte
When the plane bounced, you could hear the sound "Boeing...Boeing..."
The pilots have a lot to explain. The airline should be doing a thorough investigation into the circumstances of one of the most dangerous go-around attempts. The FAA should also be investigating.
The official explanation what happened would be really interessting to read
The go around was apparently due to a horrible landing (the plane bounces on the runway a couple of times and struggles to keep a straight line), probably due to windshear.
That‘s the aim point markings.
Looks like they failed to arm the speedbrakes prior to landing and didn't get auto-deploy on a short 8800' runway and went around. They did good going around, things happen lay off them. Lesson learned.
They didn't land, they just stopped flying 😯
that is also an interessting view ;)
I bet everyone watching was holding their breath as it came in the second time. I can't even imagine what the passengers were thinking.
yes indeed, i already hope that all passengers are fine and nothing happened. in previous comments you will find reactions from 1-2 passengers from the plane
After a closer look it seemed that the pilot selected the reverse thrust at 0:35 while trying to ease up the oscillation and holding the nose up which was too late 5 seconds later the TO/GA 0:41 possibly the other pilot realizing what was happening
Spoilers not armed? Great video !
thx, yes this was the case what i heard
First to me looks like a new pilot even with some oscilliations.
Spoilers seem to deploy on both wings only at 0:34. Maybe they were not armed or didn't deploy because of the bouncing? They go back down 0:35 when they initiated the go around.
Quite dramatic viewing and an uncomfortable ride for the pax. Maybe should have gone around one bounce prior? Don't know what the handbook says. But surely the right decision.
Great catch!
Thx for the compliment. There were only 900m left on the runway, there were not much alternatives besides take off again, or the plane would have stopped after the runway
@@zrhaircraft Yeah. He initiated the GA between Foxtrott and Echo. Not much room to play with left. Wonder how much runway was left when the wheels actually left the ground. Hard to see because of the dip in the rwy.
@@zrhaircraft this rwy has an overrun extension, which might have come handy here. Nobody would get hurt if the plane got into it.
@@PeterNGloor yes this i learned after the first comments here in the chat, this overrun extension is absolutely needed for this short runway.
@@zrhaircraft Mind you, the overrun has not been in place for a long time. Landings into the wind have taken place with all sizes of planes for decades without any incident. But an overrun section is still a good safety feature.
good decision to go around
yes indeed
Agreed, it was primarily caused by not having the speedbrakes armed. But DARN it was close to a tail strike in those pitch oscillations!
Sometimes they are armed but don't deploy. Seen it plenty of times. In this case they are manually deployed by pilot flying.
They came too fast! After the second "jump", go around! Don't take the whole runway to realize that you need to go around!
it seems pilot still tried to land, but tower told them to do a go around, this one of the passengers stated in one of the previous comments
@@zrhaircraft I wonder if they really got a call from the tower. The tower cannot normally do this.
nice bos
What the Hell!!! I was literally screaming @my Screen "Go AROUND!!!" ATC Traffic should be interesting!?
unfortunately not ATC this time, during life screams I do ATC, would be very interesting this time
I think he pumped the power on the landing interrupting the spoilers.
Well done by the crew that they avoided the tailstrike and handled this aircraft safely, even during the heavy bounces. The late go-around was, for sure, the right decision
At the end it was the right decision by the crew for sure.
This was really hard to watch, almost got second hand embarrassment.
Amazing video! Thank you for posting. I'm no pilot, but I thought that the "successful" landing was pretty awful, too. Not only does United Airlines break guitars, but I suspect that they probably also break a lot of landing gear. ;-)
thx for the compliment, i never saw or captured something like this before :)
Yes, as a passenger on this flight, I can confirm that the actual landing was very hard.
@@CarolBurger-ru7vc you mean the first one?
@@PeterNGloorNo, I mean the second one, where we actually stayed on the ground.
Não percebo esta situação, anda a fazer acrobacia ou faltou-lhe a pista, por mim penso que é um maçarico muito novo, para fazer uma borrice destas, só pode, então o Comandante onde estava?
His go around decision was far too late. The landing was destabilised immediately after touchdown. The aircraft seemed to have too much airspeed at touchdown.