Glad I came across this video on the Celtic people. I've read the U.S. and Britain in Prophecy by Mr. Armstrong many years ago. He sparked my interest in learning more about this topic. My mother's mother (my grandmother) told me once when I was a teenager that my great grandmother was Scots Irish and German. I've been to Belfast Northern Ireland and felt a connection to the area. How great is our God when He opens our minds to the truth of our ancestry and it's connection to ancient Israel. Prophecy is alive! Thank you! Please continue this program!
In Irish mythology there is a story of the Tuatha de Danann, or people of the Goddess Danu. Depicts the arrival of the "black Irish" or Irish from the Black Sea. Princess Scota also ties into this story, she brought her followers to Ireland and Scotland and became the founder of both nations. She was known as the Black Sea Princess . Her grave is still marked by huge boulders in Ireland.
The Celts are the Galilean Israelites(the tribes of Zevulun, Issachar and Naphtali) taken captive from Israel around 730 BC to Assyria by Tiglathpileser III and when he died in 727 BC they spread out to Iberia so named for the Hebrew language speaking Galileans which in Hebrew is called Ivrit after Iver meaning in Hebrew is one who has crossed over(be it the sea or a river) so Iver became Iveria the B and V were almost indistinguishable in Hebrew speech as is still the case today in the Iberian peninsula languages! The written ancient Celtic is a Galilean dialect of the ancient Hebrew and was written in paleo Hebrew with a few altered symbols/ letters. One generation away from fellow Israelites plus many generations away from their fellow Israelite tribes(the 9 others) had altered their language too! All the same qualities still exist today among today's Celts as was then evident among the 3 Galilean tribes! DNA has also proven their origins from Israel but there's a global conspiracy either at work to hide those facts as it would prove the fact that the history books have been rewritten by the evil leaders of this world to suit their agendas! To divide and rule has always been their tactic. They turned brother against brother by telling them they have different origins from each other and saying they were each their enemies which was always the dividing lie accompanied by a whole array of lies to cause baseless anger between these groups. These tactics are still being used everywhere in the world today by those who rule this world!
Thank you! I am using Joseph Dumond’s 2300 Days of Hell, The Two Witnesses, Joseph’s 7 Years of Plenty and the 7 Years of Famine as a homeschooling curriculum to teach my children about the migration of the Israelites through Europe toNorth America. Your video showing the migration has been most helpful.
The Gundestrup cauldron was buried in Denmark sometime around 1500 AD at the earliest. Clearly, it wasn't buried by those who made it. Different panels were made at different times. Could have been last in Celtic hands in Spain. Remember, there were Greek colonies all along the French and Spanish coasts.
Actually it was the ancestors of the celts, the indoeuropeans from the Yamnaya culture in the steppes north of the black sea and caspian sea, who brought the horses, chariots and bronze to europe. They mixed with the old population that was already there and later separated into celts, germans, slavs and so on.
Thanks for clarifying, this is what I have read, celtic is a cultural period of technological change and migration of individual tribes, which appears to have been a constant for thousands of years.
About 7 minutes into the interview Kevin almost quotes verbatim from John T. Koch book: "TARTESSIAN" page 266 that Celtic was interacting with a Semitic language much like Hebrew.
We dont really know what kind of language the Hallstatt and LaTene people spoke. Obviously the culture spread far. technology, probably religion too. But we dont know for people moved and spread or the culture only. Or half - half. Fact is, where the cultural border in mid of germany separated the celtic and german culture, we still have a dialect border.
Isn't supposed that the Yamnaya people from Volga basin who settled in West Europe around 2000 bC were the ones who introduced chariots and horses much earlier that Celts?
Suggest you read Barry Cunliffe's book(s), he doesn't claim the celts were descended from tribes migrated around the Black sea (the Indo-European languages may have). There was migration from there due to to eastward pressure (eg the Scythians), but it petered out on the Hungarian planes (and no evidence - grave goods, burial types etc - that they spread further west) , that was the eastern fringes of the celtic heartlands. Some celtic tribes/groups did migrate east to the Black sea area (Thrace etc) but were eventually wiped out. Some did successfully migrate to Turkey (the Galacians , as per the Bible book) and could be recognised as celtic for generations afterwards.
I have read a number of studies that discount celts as having distinct genetic markers in britain. Apparently we are much more diverse genetically than that. I think people conflate haplogroups with celtic culture. Studies have changed since 2005 re Oxford study. I would like know the latest haplo science on the subject. I think the roman writing on britain have got stuck. No one in britain called themselves celt. It's all interesting and much to learn.
the evidence is strong and almost conclusive; the two branches of celts lived and departed from somewhere around the Black Sea, having contact with the peoples like Hittites, Assyrians and Egyptians that used the horses and war chariots. From there some migrated through Greece or the northern Africa where finally reached Spain.
Chariots were developed around the Pontic Steppe (north of the Black Sea) and where all the genetic and linguistic evidence also points to for the origins of the Celtic peoples. This channel tends to ignore that view as it seeks to prop up the Anatolian thesis for some reason. I believe their adherence to this theory (which has largely been rejected by academia) is because the organisation is pushing Christian propaganda (check out their website if you're curious -- they are not an objective source on any of this).
Many people in various disciplines (and outside of those same disciplines) contend that "academia" is by definition not scientific, is largely based on unexpressed and unproven assumptions, and vociferously protects their sources of funding, academic positions they may have, and their academic chairmanships. Sounds like "propaganda. Research the Electric Universe Model on TH-cam. It is not the standard "scientific propaganda". And it has been successfully tested in the physics laboratory.
"Your ancestry" ! if you trace back to the time of the celts, about 2000 years ago, you potentially have over 1000 trillion, trillion trillion ( that's 1 followed by 30 x 0s) ancestors. That's far more people than have ever existed, even far more stars than astronomers calculate in the entire universe,. Even if you're a Yank, or an Australian, , your ancestry will likely include every tribe in Europe. I'm not having a go at you - I'm Welsh myself, but people fail to grasp the maths involved: numbers double every generation. Geneticists reckon all Europeans have a common ancestor in the 15th century (AD) - that's only 500 years ago (and they think she was a German)
@@philldavies7940 Phil, I am afraid the idea that all Europeans descend from a common ancestor 500 years ago is absurd. Please provide a scientific reference for this claim.
@@philldavies7940 maths dont double every generation. Theres also incest and generations skipped it wasn't uncommon to have a mom have sex with her grandson. And things like that. This cuts down the number of peopme you're related too. Although only mens fathers dna passes to them and womens dna passes to them.
@@philldavies7940, about a third of my direct ancestors are American Indians... and a full half are Germanic... the rest come from Ireland. So as far as who I may or may not be related to goes... it is indeed a large group. ...though I doubt it's quite as large as you seem to think. 😉 ( I don't buy that bible-thumping B.S. that claims we all came from just 2 people. ) Oh, and "Potential" is a far cry from "actual". Remember what Mark Twain said: "Figures lie and liars figure."
Great video. He mentioned that this was a time when a man's word meant something. To some of us, it still does. My grandfather and father both preached that a man's word is his honor. Not sticking to your word is dishonorable, and in the end that's all we have besides our flesh. A poor man who sticks to his word is infinitely more wealthy than a man who lies and does not.
I have Scottish on my mothers side, and my from my father I have Irish, Asian and Middle Eastern. From both I also have other European DNA. So if the Celts really did come from the Middle East then if I add my Irish and Scottish DNA with my Middle Eastern DNA then that should technically make me approximately 1 quarter Middle Eastern. Hmmm... Guess I have more research to do instead of just taking info from one source.
Even since the tome of the celts (about 2000 years ago) you potentially have more descendant than grains of sand on the world (do the maths), => don't read too much into your DNA, you;ll have DNA from everywhere.
I agree with both of you! That's why I try to fact check as much as possible. I kept scratching my head watching this video because it just didn't seem to fall in line with accuracy...
Newgrange in the Boyne Valley Complex, Ireland... would have been 2000 plus years old when the Celts arrived - but yes, it is interesting but Neolithic not very late Bronze, Early to mid Iron Age.. :))))
Another idea has the Celts coming from the Middle East (may explain the Hebrew like inscriptions) either passing from Sythia or from there or perhaps a mixture of peoples on the move from different areas?
It would be a bit like saying that Minoan Crete was attributable to the early Athenians.. or that they had some connection. They probably, possibly did, but it was the other way around :))))
See what happens when you point out inconvenient truths? The 'Celts' is a lie. Invented 1714 . This gobshite is obfuscating settlement by Syrians and displaced Trojans.Both of whom were metalworkers and mound burial builders. You are correct.
I just did my DNA test and it shows that I am English , a bitt Scot and a bit Irish and my English bit is yorkshire and Essex. But I am brown eyed and dark hair. I always felt like I came from a warm country. I look more mediteranneon . May be I am Celt. Don't know how you find out. The DNA test only goes back 10 generations. That is to maybe 1700. And I am always cold. Shouldn't I be blond blue eyed and tall?
I'm the same. Very olive tan. Rh neg blood and my ancesters migrated from Britain to the middle east and then back again. Known as 10 of the 12 lost tribes. Not lost at all. They left an alphabet and a cypher for us to re-learn what has been hidden and lost. Ceaser described our alphabet and said the Greeks got their alphabet from the Brits.
History PROVES the Canaanites migrated to Europe: It is true that Canaanite Phoenicians migrated to Europe in large numbers in ancient times, there must be religious and cultural ties, and in fact, such connections abound. Dr. Thomas Moore's, History of Ireland(p. 40), relates: "That most common of all Celtic monuments, the Cromlech... is to be found not only in most parts of Europe, but also in Asia," including eastern Mediterranean. Not less ancient and general, among the Celtic nations, was the circle of upright stones, with either an altar or tall pillar in the centre, and, like its prototype at the temple of Byblos, Phoenicia, Gilgal [ancient Israel], serving sometimes as a temple of worship, sometimes as a place of national council or inauguration... The rough, unhewn stone...used in their circular temples by the Druids. Dr. Beauford, in Druidism Revived, says, "It is remarkable that all the ancient altars found in Ireland, and now distinguished by the name of Cromlechs or sloping stones, were originally called Bothal, or the House of God, and they seem to be of the same species as those mentioned in the Book of Genesis, called by the Canaanites, Bethel, or discovered in Byblos, Phoenicia, which has the same signification as the Irish Bothal." The Bible (Judges 9:6; 2Ki. 11:14; 2 Chon. 23:13) indicates that Phoenician kings were crowned either standing upon or next to a pillar of stone. "The practice of seating the new king upon a stone, at his initiation, was the practice in many of the countries of Europe.... The monarchs of Sweden sat upon a stone placed in the centre of twelve lesser ones, and in a similar kind of circle the Kings of Denmark were crowned." (Moore, ibid., p. 42) Note also the significant Bible number, 'twelve', which was common to both European Celts and the Phoenicians. The Jig Is Up Canaan!
I do not think anyone knows for sure the exact location of Ophir. The archaeological study bible writes this: “Ophir was a source for gold (2Ch 8:18; Job 28:16; Ps 45:9; Isa 13:12), almugwood and precious stones (1Ki 10:11), as well as silver, ivory, apes and baboons (10:22). Suggestions for its location include southeastern Arabia, southwestern Arabia and the northeastern African coast. If Ophir was located in Arabia, it was probably a trading center for goods from farther east, as well as from east Africa. But the three-year voyages of Solomon’s merchant vessels (10:22) suggest a more distant location than the Arabian coast.” I think this last statement is correct, and that Ophir must be much further away than Arabia. Almug wood has been identified by some as White Sandalwood of India, a native of the mountainous parts of the Malabar coasts. It is a fragrant wood used in China for incense in idol-worship. Others think that it was the Indian red Sandalwood (Pterocarpus Santalinus) a heavy, fine-grained wood found on the Coromandel coast and in Ceylon. So based on the wide range of commodities and animals mentioned in the scriptures above, Ophir is likely in India or elsewhere in the far east.
Well it is iberia not spain most of the kelts , celts , gaels ,galics and so on lived in the portuguese part of iberia from the botom until gaelecia which was also a part of portugal . It is said that irish and scotish nobility came from iberia but they are descendent crossbreed from the middle eastern galatas with the native europeans along the way
Lusitanians were proto-Celtic. The Celtiberians were spread throughout the Western portions of the Peninsula - and most of that was within the boarders of modern Spain. (Basques, Iberians, Aquitaines, Greco-Phoenicians, etc. were found along the eastern portions, boarding the Mediterranean). The Celtiberians who held out against Roman subjugation and cultural assimilation were the Astur and Cantabrian tribes in the northern Atlantic coast of Spain.
Ana Merkurieff Indeed and both Galicia and Portugal have been identified as the regions of Iberia with the lowest levels of traceable Celtic genes and highest degree of Berber admixture (much of which is traced to the Moors; some of which is linked to Neolithic migration, Roman occupation, etc.). The latest genetic studies have shifted the traditional paradigm regarding the Islamic legacy in Iberia - to an East-West model for Moorish admixture, as opposed to the traditional North-South model.
This is so cool, Celtic as a fusion of many different sources coming together to create a wonderful culture. Not as convinced about the “medieval nobles’ words are sacred” thing, lot of evidence to think they were more calculating and cutthroat than that lol
"The Oera Linda" details it all quite well. They were all from the same people in the North Atlantic. After a large catastrophe(the flood) they colonized all over the maritime world. The Northern branch used the rivers to move from the Black Sea to Europe, and eventually became the Skythians. The Southern branch sailed around the Iberian Peninsula and into the Mediterranean, and eventually became known as the Phoenicians. Eventually many of them migrated back to their motherland.
Where would you place the Picts in Caledonia (Scotland) are they the remnants of the original invading celts or a tribe from Scandinavia??? As we know the Scotii (Scots) were a tribe from Scotia (Hibernia) that washed up on the shores of today's Ireland.
You are correct. Celtiberians are just one flavor of Celts (their name is just a combination of Celt + Iberia which is the ancient name for what we know as Spain and Portugal today. There were remarkable similarities in the cultures of various Celtic tribes, but there were also regional variations.
The celtaberians we're a mix of hamitic Iberian people's and cymry , Celtic in Koine, Greek means barbarian. They were shorter in stature and with a tan.
@@gumpg8735 Iberia is directly named after the Celts..Kelti was a Greek word they used to name the ppl leaving the Levant after an Assyrian invasion..these migrating ppl called themselves H'Iberi or H'Iberu,the root word for the English Transliteration word Hebrew..Ha is the Hebrew word for THE but was shortened to H'...like what happens with O'Farrell or O'Connor..the Irish have genetic markers for the Iberian Peninsula and Nth Africa..
@@deanlonagan1475 Which reminds me, an Irish youtuber I've been subscribed to for a while took a DNA test a few years back and had a small percentage of Iberian ancestry, if I recall correctly: th-cam.com/video/wdL1FN3_YMo/w-d-xo.html Just figured I'd share.
Disappointing to see the well recorded migration of the Cymru (pronounced Kum-ree) referred to by the Greeks as the Kimmeroi is not mentioned at all. The Cymru settled in South Wales where the people and language still has that name. The interviewee mentioned Nenius but seemed to forget to mention that he was Cymric/Welsh and that he described the arrival of the Welsh from Troy around 500AD. He also mentions chariots being used but not that complete chariots of the period have discovered buried in Wales. Considering Wales has detailed historical records of this period along with enscribed stones showing details and archeological finds to support the arrival it is mystifying why it never gets mentioned. Check out the britainshiddenhistory Facebook group and youtube channel if you would like to see more of the evidence being discussed - with Wales included. The writing shown also looks to be the old British/Cymric Coelbren writing.
Thanks for your comment BHH Ross. You are correct about the Welsh role in the history of the Celts. We did not not intentionally overlook the Welsh, their omission was only one of time constraints. These videos are limited to c. 10 minutes! This is a very big subject as you know, and this video is meant only as an introduction to the subject. In fact, the Welsh play a pivotal role in the Iron Age migrations to Britain and the spread of Celtic culture in the west. I expend a great deal of ink in my upcoming book on Welsh origins and migrations, including their connections to ancient Troy. The archaeological evidence found in Wales for these events is massive, as you point out. Indeed, chariots are only one of several 'smoking guns' connecting the Celts with the ancient Near East.
@@gumpg8735 Thanks - that sounds great. Especially keen to see what you have on the migrations. What is the book? I would like a copy. How do you see the Cymru as Celtic? The original Keltii were a tribe in Southern France and the first references I can find to the Welsh, Irish or Scottish being "Celtic" to have been made at the beginning of the 18th Century by Edward Lhuyd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lhuyd
@@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss Well, the book is probably still 2 years from publication. I am working on chapter 17/19 as we speak, but I will definitely let you know when it is nearing the light of day! As for the term Celt, I mainly use it as a descriptor of culture. Celtic culture, according to the traditional model, first becomes apparent in the Danube corridor around eighth century BC. Their traditional homeland was identified as the Hallstatt region in what is today Austria. Celtic culture begins spreading north and west from there until it becomes evident throughout most of western Europe. It evolves over time for many reasons, becoming what archaeologists call La Tene, materials of which again appear all over western Europe and Britain. So, Celtic material covers an awful big swathe of time and territory. The most recent research indicates that the earliest Celts appeared in southwest Spain, not Austria. Certainly the oldest Celtic inscriptions to date are found in Spain, which is interesting because of the Welsh and Irish legendary connections to Spain (not to mention the recent genetic linkages). The term Celt can be misleading, and is sometimes used for various political purposes that do not hold a lot of water. The term actually predates the Roman Empire. It was first used by Roman observers to classify the European tribes they encountered into two main groups: Germanii and Gauls (with a far-too-convenient line along the Rhine River separating them). The phoneme ‘Gal’ remains to this day across Europe: Portugal, Gallia in France, Galicia in Spain and Poland, and even Galatia in Turkey. The Greeks referred to the Gauls as Keltoi, or Celts. The first written instance of the word Keltoi is found in a seventh century BC sailing manual, the Massilliot Periplus, in which Keltoi were described living beyond the tin-producing areas of the Atlantic seaboard. The Greek geographer Hecataeus (c.550-490 BC) was also familiar with the Keltoi. Hope this helps. Thanks again for your comments.
@Cymro 65 the Welsh appeared to be from Germany they were allies of the gauls in the wars against the Romans they had other enemies. Hundreds of hill forts were abandoned with no clue to where they went but ap hywel , clan was the biggest land owners in the south of Britain. And allotted them land may Gus father of welsh married a daughter of the royal lowothen clan.
What is this channels deal with pushing a warped history about the Celts? The spread of Celtic started from the Upper Danube; movements of them have been documented by Greek and Roman sources coming out of this area not from the Lower Danube. Celts only started spreading northwards in Europe after their ousting from the Balkan area from the Greeks and the collapse of the original Hallstatt homeland from currently unknowns pressures. The establishment of a Celtic cultural continuum from current day Moldova to Northern Europe is something that has quite a bit of reputable evidence behind it. Celts; like many other Indo-European cultures venerated cavalry so the tie between them and the Thracian in this regard is not unique nor directly related between the two parties. Lastly Tartessian Language and culture is not accepted as Celtic with the Mosas Do Castolino not even considered to be Indo-European. This is besides the fact the the material culture of the area is much more akin to Mediterranean artifacts than anything from Northern Europe. Please stop pushing this false narrative and read the actual literature on the subject before making these videos.
You are correct that the Celts spread out from the Hallstatt area of the Upper Danube. Over the course of a few hundred years they spread into almost every part of Europe, establishing the ‘Celtic cultural continuum’ that you mention. Nothing in this clip suggests otherwise. It seems, however, that you have overlooked the central question: Where did this Celtic culture originate in the first place? If you adhere to the anti-migrational theories that arose in the 1960s, you would say that the Celts simply evolved from the Urnfield People that dominated central Europe for centuries prior to the Hallstatt era. But this is becoming increasingly untenable. First, ancient-DNA studies are rapidly debunking the idea that large scale migrations never occurred in the past. Second, it is highly unlikely that Hallstatt’s advanced equine-based culture arose organically. As a former horse owner, I can attest to the steep learning curve associated with becoming a competent horseman. Yet Hallstatt C appears relatively suddenly in Europe - complete with a package of highly advanced equine knowledge and war fighting capabilities. Where did they acquire this knowledge? Barry Cunliffe describes these tribes as horse riding aristocracies. Can it be a coincidence that a few weeks’ journey down the Danube corridor, on shores of the Black Sea, was a region crowded with tribes that could only be described as horse-riding aristocracies? Your suggestion that Tartessian is not accepted as Celtic is dated. I would suggest picking up a copy of the 3-volume Celtic From the West series from Oxbow publishing in Oxford. It is a great survey of the most cutting-edge research regarding the Celts. Contributors include some of the leading academics in Europe including Barry Cunliffe, John Koch, Raimund Karl and others. Dr. John Koch has analyzed hundreds of Tartessian inscriptions, concluding that they represent the earliest written form of Celtic found so far, easily predating scripts found in central Europe. Koch concludes outright that a group of proto-Celts arrived in southwest Spain by sea, bringing new burial practices, weapons, and even chariots along for the ride. In other words, these proto-Celts, and by extension, components of early Celtic culture in Spain, came from somewhere. Your comment that the Tartessian culture was more Mediterranean than northern European is also correct. That the Tartessians may not be Indo-European at all makes Koch’s findings even more compelling. Especially his realization that the Tartessian language was interacting with and being modified by a Semitic language like Hebrew. You have connected some dots. In fact, there are Near Eastern substrates detectable in the cultures of both the eastern European Celts (Hallstatt and La Tene), and the early Celts of SW Spain.
Gump G The celtic haplogroups are classified as a sub-branch of haplogroup R. This fits the model of expansion forming from the North via the Eurasian Steppe. The model of expansion that is put forth here is a northwestward expansion via the Mediterranean and Danube that started from the Levant. No evidence via archaeology, genetics or linguistics supports this notion. Celtic culture from what can be currently reconstructed; expanded from Central Europe outwards in all directions expect for directly northwards and eventually culminated in being concentrated in Northwestern Europe. Now that being said high distributions in pockets in Iberia, it is safe to assume a diffusion into these areas from the north rather than the south. This is supported by the adoption of Celtic place names that have been identified in Tartessian along with other Indo-European influences despite the languages’ structure as a whole being considered to be much closer to Old European languages. Another factor that supports this is the recognition of the Atlantic Bronze complex which shows that contact between peoples across the Atlantic coast of Europe had been established. Diffusion through the Mediterranean and Atlantic shores of Europe from the north in waves has much more support than the route portrayed in this video.
@@anthropologicalminds2855 You're incorrect to state that "No evidence via archaeology, genetics or linguistics supports this notion." British historian Alan Wilson was the first to translate a scroll found with the Dead Sea Scrolls in Qumran. He translated it because he knew Welsh Coelbren. The ancient language in Britain had 4000 words in common with Hebrew, including Brit which means covenant and ish which means man. British in Hebrew means covenant man. Welsh Coelbren inscriptions are all along the migration routes between the Levant and the British and Irish Isles, found in Mediterranean Islands as well as Turkey and Northern Italy. Celts are Israelites as the Scots declared in the Declaration of Arbroath. There were several migrations of Israelites to Britain and Ireland, using more than one route, although the most common route was probably by ship through the Mediterranean Sea.
@@anthropologicalminds2855 Another thing, Alan WIlson could read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics because using his Welsh Coelbren knowledge, he could read an inscription written by Moses (Mosheh), an Israelite, in Egypt that explains how to read hieroglyphics. That links the Welsh language to Egypt and the Israelites who moved there in Israel's (formerly known as Yaakov aka Jacob) time, when Israel's son Yosef (aka Joseph) was second in charge to Pharoah in Egypt during a great famine.
musiqman Alan Wilson and his cohorts are the definition of charlatans. No independent evaluation of their work has been made available for peer review research nor have they provided anything convincing. Tell Alan to organize his best arguments and thoughts into a coherent paper with access to his claimed artifacts. Shouldn’t be too hard if he has spent decades arguing for his viewpoint.
Why always one looks for Germany-Austria? Well known history - Celtics are South-Western pre-Georgians accompanied South Iberians, leaving Planes of Ararat, invaded by Urartu-Chaldea. It started 15 Century BC and continued for Centuries from other parts of pre-Georgia. They intermarried with locals, Galics and others. common name was later used as Celtic... Language was pre-Georgian group, that also was used by Israelites, Which later forgot it and changed it, mixing with Chaldean Sara… “Ba Ra He Ai Diah O Ahi ai” they chaged to “Boruh Ato Adonay…”
Stonehenge predates the Celts by a very long time span. Stonehenge was built around 5,500 years ago in a period called the Neolithic, rough;y 2,000 years before Celts appeared in Europe.
The beaker people, who were descend from the original hunter gathers who entered the UK after the last ice age ended about 10,000 BC. The British "celts" were probably just descended from them.
@@philldavies7940 Your information is dated. I suspect you have a copy of Stephen Oppenheimer's 2007 book: 'The Origins of the British' on your shelf. I am nearing the conclusion of a book in excess of 1,000 pages that will prove beyond any doubt that the Celts are not descended from the Beaker people. Ancient DNA alone shows several examples of complete population replacements in Europe by eastern migrants in the Neolithic. The Beaker people were replaced by an entirely new people with more advanced technology and a completely different culture centuries after this. I'll send you a copy of the book when it is published.
@@philldavies7940 the Bell Beaker People were not descended from the indigenous hunter gathers and they didn't build Stonehenge. The Bell Beaker People came from Europe and replaced the farming people who built Stonehenge. The indigenous hunter gathers were replaced by the farming people who built Stonehenge.
@@gumpg8735 this new people were the Celts, who came from the Pontic Steppes around 4.000 BC and 2.500 BC. They were R1b and replaced previous populations by 90%. See David Reich's ancient DNA research published in 2018.
Yes! You are correct. The Greeks referred to the Gauls as Keltoi, or Celts. The 'Gal' in Galatia is the same phoneme that is seen in Portugal, Gallia in France, Galicia in Spain and Poland, and Galatia in modern Turkey (the Galatians of biblical times). They actually migrated back to Turkey from western Europe.
mmm, I'm not sure that would hold up to any sort of scientific scrutiny.. I quite like Simon and Garfunkel's condor, that doesn't; mean my family comes from Peru !!
Jan Pearson, no they were not lost tribes of Israel , this is talking far older than that period so we rule that Out. These people they were Hebrew people the oldest people on the earth they come from YEMEN , there is where are coming from. The writing that you showed from South of SPAIN is in SABEAN language is the same people the Hebrew, the Phoenician is the same people the Hebrew, they are soo many tribe took different ways to form in New settlement. These people they were the first people to use IRON . These people are the first human immigration they were just just travelling just going, just passing through. Hebrew meaning ( PASSING THROUGH )
Gaul=Galatae=Celitae. Celtic culture and languages were formed in situ, circa 2700-1900 bce, in Spain, Armorica, Wales, Ireland. The culture, language, and original Celtic aristocracy pushed their identity eastwards between 1900-1000 bce. It took 1000s of years to form Celtic language and identity during the Bronze Age. IE languages were planted along Atlantic-Europe by the western IE steppe people (“Scythians”) between 2700-1900 bce. The Hallstatt La Tene was the last phase (an Iron Age) of a long Celtic Age, this phase transmitted by a dynastic warrior-elite class, it was not the beginnings of a new “Celtic Culture.” Celtic society formed on the coasts of Atlantic-Europe during the Late Copper, Early Bronze Age.
There is 2000 years between the hallstatt culture and the arrival of the steppe people with their horses and chariots in mid europe. Trading routes were established long time. Amber from the black sea is found in old egypt and bronze and silver from the levante in scandinavia.
You are partially correct. Hallstatt culture does predate the arrival of the horse riding aristocracies, they are referred to as the Urnfield Culture in this video for that is a more recognizable term. Technically, the Urnfield People are classified as Hallstatt A and B, they live during the Late Bronze Age. The Urnfield - Hallstatt transition occurs in the ninth century BC with the appearance of Hallstatt C, the beginning of the Iron Age (and the appearance of the horse riding aristocracies from the east). Read Iron Age Communities in Britain (pg. 447) by Professor Barry Cunliffe. He writes: “The beginning of what can be reasonably called the Iron Age in Europe is linked to the development of the Hallstatt Culture, characterized by the appearance of a horse-riding aristocracy using a long slashing sword and frequently burying their dead in timber-built tombs beneath barrows”. I suppose Hallstatt C should have been identified, but again, it is necessary to summarize much in a short video like this. That said, Hallstatt A does not predate Hallstatt C by 2000 years. Not even close. Hallstatt A begins only around 1200 BC.... 400 years prior to the arrival of horse riding aristocrats, at the most.
@@gumpg8735 The horse people with chariots arrived in europe about 3500 bc. Dont know for they did horseriding already. In the next 2000 years they mixed with the local people and spread their language. The languag(es) started to move away from each other and formed the later slavik, germanic and celtic and italic languages. The Hallstatt or LaTene culture started not before 2000 bc rather about 1500 bc. the Hallstatt people had in the east mainly small villages with sometimes wooden palisades. In the west they had from some time on kind of castles or fortresses on a hill above a city what indicates a nobility. That is documented by the romans. We dont know much about the 2000 years between the arrival of horses in middle europe and hallstatt. Even from the gauls and germanic tribes we only know so much through the roman and greek eyes. The celts and germans or slavs had nothing written down. Maybe a far echo can be seen in the nordic saga.
..why does no one go further back than Eastern Europe or Scythia for Celt migration when there is evidence for migration further back..to Israel in fact and the Lower Nile before then and finally to Mesopotamia where that group of different ppls who migrated to and took the Lower Nile originally came from..they have been called many names..Hyksos,H'Iberu(the root word for Hebrew)Israelite,Kelti,Gaul,Gael and Scotti..but now we just call them fekkin Paddies..
I have done this research and found the same. Also the links in the Bible with the book of Hosea and how the tribes would be known as “Gomer”. You’re correct though, and the artwork of the Hyskos and Habirus show them with zkitzkits clearly identifies who they were
heh. I am H1B and I hate horses! I was bitten when I was a child and never trusted them again. The Kurgan also inhabited the lands around the Black Sea.
Sure, he quotes Nennius, his «Historia Britonnum» who made up loads of things, and lived at least 5 to 3.000 years after the arrival of the Celts to Western Europe. He pronounced the Lebor Gabála Érenn like shite. Also many things in these books of Leinster are historically inaccurate, just written too late for an oral traditional society like the Celtic. For old historians often invented fantastic origins to their peoples. These points together take out any chance of credibility to his explanations.
You're right Denis this lad is a complete clown. Scot is just the Latin word for Irish. Did you hear the hames he made of saying the book of invasions? Can you imagine someone saying they are an expert in our culture who doesn't even know how to say 3 words in our language.
@@philldavies7940 the scotti weren't a tribe. The dal riadans were the tribe that settled Scotland. Scotti was the latin word for Irish and scottorum was the latin for Ireland
@@philldavies7940 there's also the fact that Scotland like all countries has a multi ethnic indigenous culture. Scots people are only 1 ethnicity and there's been centuries of sectarian violence between them and the Gaelic ethnicity. So being called a scot doesn't go down well with everyone
@@ByrneMJames when he started talking about Scots I kind of lost all trust in everything he said. The Scots are quite a recent nation. A thousand years ago the people of Scotland were many different ethnicities including Picts, Britons, Anglo Saxons, Scotti and Norwegian.
The dispersal of humanity at the tower of Babel makes perfect sense of this evidence. Just one more suggestion that the Bible is historically accurate and can therefore be trusted to be accurate in spiritual matters as well
Sorry no the bible is historical the Talmud is the original source however the New is more of legends and mythology before you criticise look how many pagan symbols have been hijacked into Christian dogma and ceremonies we worship pantheons not monolithic. The bible for me as a child was a great source of joy however to quote "when I was a child I spoke as a child " we are no longer children until the Vatican releases definitive credibility my bible is used as a reference on my historical/fiction shelf
Mick the story hes taking about isn't biblical. It just references the bible. Its no more history than Dan browns books. The story was written by some great medieval writers and its an incredible complex bit of European high literature but its just a story. There was this thing called the carolingian world chronical. Or the chron of eusebius or prosper of aquitaine. It tried to legitimatise the holy roman empire by showing Gods guiding hand in setting it up. The chronical is like a spreadsheet with all the great countries kings dying n being replaced at the same times in history. Until constantine has his revelation on the road to damascus and from then on all the kings bend their knee to the man leading gods people. It meant that medieval people could glance at the pages and see that the holy roman empire was a part of Gods plan for humanity. But we didn't have one ruler there were 150 kingdoms here n it messed up the spreadsheet. So they openly wrote a pseudo history to fit us in. The lad in this video is either lying to sell his book or he genuinely hasn't got a clue. It's not just that he doesn't know Irish history and cant pronounce 3 words in our language the right way. Hes treating different countries as if they're generic across thousands of years of time. He definitely isnt a man that lives by the Bible.
A lot of inexact and missing information, the world and the science has progressed big time since the times of this celt germanic myths,. There is a lot of history ignored before and after the Romans in places like France, the Italy and Spain and Al, and all the genomic science for example the Y chromosome dna from the times of the yamnaya culture back on the bronze age.
Could these Celtics people be the decedents of Jacob's 10 boys who knew war with the horse & chariot of their Egyptian captivity & then from those days of concurring the promise land. As these families grew into powerful fighting men who founded the 10 Northern Tribes & later to be driven from the land by God for their disobedience, using the Assyrian. Who took them North to the boundaries of the Assyrian Empire reached as far as the Caucasus Mountains. & Latter crossing over the Caucasus's into Europe these Isaacs sons who some called Scythians & later to be call Caucasians.
Newgrange and the Boyne Valley "monuments" predate "Celts" by about 2000 years or so.. and anything Biblical to pre Exodus, - well over 1500 years before Hittites, Babylonians, Assyrians etc.. 1 to 1.5k older than current dating on the pyramids.. so Celts and any connection to anything British Isles, pre Classical Greek, early Roman, Etruscan is a bit like saying that the Early Normans may have participated in the American Civil War..
Culture & artifacts are not people or their genetics. People with the Y-DNA (R1b-M269 and subclades) and the autosomal DNA (lactase persistence, hemochromatosis, light complexion/eyes, etc, that are common among present-day western Europeans as opposed being uncommon among the largely supplanted Old European hunter-gatherers & farmers) of Indo-Europeans from the Pontic Steppe near the Black Sea have been in Ireland and the British Isles (the NW extreme extent of their travels and migrations) since the end of the third millennium BCE (early Bronze Age), Amesbury Archer, Rathlin 1, 2 & 3, etc. From isotopic (strontium/oxygen) analysis, they came up the Rhine River valley and crossed the English Channel. In all likelihood they spoke Proto-Indo-European dialects that would have been found from eastern Europe to the Atlantic fringe of Europe, each interacting to a greater and lesser extents with the local Old-European-/non--Indo-European-speakers, and with expected local/regional linguistic evolution, representing local/regional variations with more or less mutual intelligibility among them. Q-Celtic was spoken in Iberia, Ireland & NW Britain. P-Celtic was spoken from the rest of Britain, France and across much of trans-alpine Europe for two millennia before the Roman conquests. Iron Age artifacts of Celtic cultures like Halstatt, La Tène & Tartesso, represent, as do any such cultural horizons, innovations by Celtic groups in their locality. Their artifacts and technology spread through trade, travel and migration. These cultural innovation do not represent the origin of the Celts, any more than the invention of bourbon whiskey in the 18th-century Ohio River Valley represents the origin of the Scotch-Irish/Ulster Scots people. Watch these: th-cam.com/video/rg0hr87Adok/w-d-xo.html, th-cam.com/video/G8FM9nMFbfI/w-d-xo.html & th-cam.com/video/Ub5izFOdtDs/w-d-xo.html
the declaration of arbroath does not referr to the scots as celts. Neither nennius nor bede nor gildas ever talked about celts in the british isles.All invented by edward lluyd in 1700.
But Tacitus wrote that the Britons spoke a very similar language to that of the Gauls. Often the same tribal and personal names, place names, geographic names. Often same gods, art styles, war practices and weapons (Carnyx, javeline, broad swords, chain mail). Similar religion (Druids, Bards, Vates, sacred boards as martial symbols and horses worship). They were all Celts.
The truth is the origin of The Celts is unknown. And someone else describing the same geographic area will replace The Celts with Germanic tribes or they overlap. Everybody seems to have a different story but nobody seems to really have any facts. And nothing could have originated with either The Celts or Germanic Tribes because both were peoples who migrated from someplace else. I mean for decades the story has been that European civilization was started by the immigration of The Greeks and The Romans. So how does the story of The Celts square with that?
..Kelti is a Greek word for ppl who called themselves H'Iberu, H'Iberi(Iberia,Iberian Peninsula) the root words for the English translation Hebrew..and the Germanics were an Assyrian ppl who also moved into Western Europe but on a more northerly route than the Celts..and there is a lot of evidence for where the Celts came from,you just need to learn it..youve learnt some of it here in these comments..notice a lot of the comments corroborate each other and add to the story..
@gearoid quirke I wasn't sure at first that you didn't know what you were talking about. But once you started quoting the Apocrypha I knew you went off the deep end.
It's really sick how you start talking history as an archeologist or historian, and then you start mumbling about Solomon and the "ancient Israel"...the bible is not a history book pal ,stop spreading lies for political reasons Assyrian, Egyptian, phoenician,Akkadians, Sumarian, Hittic, Babylon,Persian, Greeks and Romans are what you should be talking about when you want to discuss the History of the near east and mesopotamia..not the " powerfull chariots of Solomon"...yeah right...were Celts in your bible too speaking hebrew?
Mmmm. Interesting response. The very Assyrian records you speak of mention the Israelite chariot forces, as well as all the area to which they sent Israelite captives. A standing stone, excavated at the ancient Israelite city of Dan, mentions the House of David directly. Many... many more secular proofs available form the ancient world. Perhaps you will read of them in my book.... if you are courageous enough to face the facts with an open mind.
As for 'Hebrew speaking Celts'... You misunderstood my comments completely. First, it is ridiculous to talk of Celts in the bible. There weren't any. You need to understand how intermarriage and migration modify culture over time. But the fact that a Hebrew-like language, possibly Hebrew itself, influenced the development of the Celtic languages is now undisputed. Here is a quote from the renowned Welsh linguist, Professor John Koch, from the University of Wales: ""…it appears that an ancient Celtic language was directly and profoundly interacting with a Semitic language (one very similar to Hebrew, which has often been invoked in the Hamito-Semitic argument), and at the same time participating in innovations shared with the Celtic of Gaul, Britain, and Ireland” (emphasis mine). One possible explanation for this according to Dr. Koch is that a second group of “proto-Celtic” people had sailed west in addition to those that walked or rode from their Austrian homelands. - Paradigm Shift? Interpreting Tartessian as Celtic (Celtic from the West), Pgs. 192, 208;
Well seen, that is the most probable semitic language in the British lsles, through Tartessos and trade with Phoenicians and Carthaginians. Probably little groups of them which left a substrat in indoeuropean Celtic (the famous VSO). But Phoenician is not proto hebrew, albeit both can have a common proto semitic ancestor.
Fascinating insights into Celtic origins.
Glad I came across this video on the Celtic people. I've read the U.S. and Britain in Prophecy by Mr. Armstrong many years ago. He sparked my interest in learning more about this topic. My mother's mother (my grandmother) told me once when I was a teenager that my great grandmother was Scots Irish and German. I've been to Belfast Northern Ireland and felt a connection to the area. How great is our God when He opens our minds to the truth of our ancestry and it's connection to ancient Israel. Prophecy is alive! Thank you! Please continue this program!
Fascinating. I wish this was a much longer documentary.
In Irish mythology there is a story of the Tuatha de Danann, or people of the Goddess Danu. Depicts the arrival of the "black Irish" or Irish from the Black Sea. Princess Scota also ties into this story, she brought her followers to Ireland and Scotland and became the founder of both nations. She was known as the Black Sea Princess . Her grave is still marked by huge boulders in Ireland.
The Celts are the Galilean Israelites(the tribes of Zevulun, Issachar and Naphtali) taken captive from Israel around 730 BC to Assyria by Tiglathpileser III and when he died in 727 BC they spread out to Iberia so named for the Hebrew language speaking Galileans which in Hebrew is called Ivrit after Iver meaning in Hebrew is one who has crossed over(be it the sea or a river) so Iver became Iveria the B and V were almost indistinguishable in Hebrew speech as is still the case today in the Iberian peninsula languages! The written ancient Celtic is a Galilean dialect of the ancient Hebrew and was written in paleo Hebrew with a few altered symbols/ letters. One generation away from fellow Israelites plus many generations away from their fellow Israelite tribes(the 9 others) had altered their language too! All the same qualities still exist today among today's Celts as was then evident among the 3 Galilean tribes! DNA has also proven their origins from Israel but there's a global conspiracy either at work to hide those facts as it would prove the fact that the history books have been rewritten by the evil leaders of this world to suit their agendas! To divide and rule has always been their tactic. They turned brother against brother by telling them they have different origins from each other and saying they were each their enemies which was always the dividing lie accompanied by a whole array of lies to cause baseless anger between these groups. These tactics are still being used everywhere in the world today by those who rule this world!
You’re absolutely correct my friend, I’ve been studying this for quite a while myself
More about the Tartessos texts, please!!!
Thank you! I am using Joseph Dumond’s 2300 Days of Hell, The Two Witnesses, Joseph’s 7 Years of Plenty and the 7 Years of Famine as a homeschooling curriculum to teach my children about the migration of the Israelites through Europe toNorth America. Your video showing the migration has been most helpful.
The Gundestrup cauldron was buried in Denmark sometime around 1500 AD at the earliest. Clearly, it wasn't buried by those who made it. Different panels were made at different times. Could have been last in Celtic hands in Spain. Remember, there were Greek colonies all along the French and Spanish coasts.
Any references on Queen Scotta?
Actually it was the ancestors of the celts, the indoeuropeans from the Yamnaya culture in the steppes north of the black sea and caspian sea, who brought the horses, chariots and bronze to europe. They mixed with the old population that was already there and later separated into celts, germans, slavs and so on.
Michael Weskamp But who was this old population? The bagpipes also came from Eurasia.
wait what? so the celts and the slavs are related?
@@im_so_bored3896 All the people in Europe are related, except the Basques and Hungarians.
@@buffy377 Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers from Anatolia.
Thanks for clarifying, this is what I have read, celtic is a cultural period of technological change and migration of individual tribes, which appears to have been a constant for thousands of years.
Great video. Will you please put a link for Mr. Gibson's book?
About 7 minutes into the interview Kevin almost quotes verbatim from John T. Koch book: "TARTESSIAN" page 266 that Celtic was interacting with a Semitic language much like Hebrew.
Fantastic! Well done, I thoroughly enjoyed this informative video. Keep up the good work!
Don't all smelted metals contain a unique "finger print" and will tell where the ore was quarried?
We dont really know what kind of language the Hallstatt and LaTene people spoke. Obviously the culture spread far. technology, probably religion too. But we dont know for people moved and spread or the culture only. Or half - half. Fact is, where the cultural border in mid of germany separated the celtic and german culture, we still have a dialect border.
Isn't supposed that the Yamnaya people from Volga basin who settled in West Europe around 2000 bC were the ones who introduced chariots and horses much earlier that Celts?
Exactly!
Thanks! I was about to say the same. He said the Halstatt Culture brought Kurgans and horses to Europe. I stopped watching at 1:20.
Awesome stuff! ♡
Who are the Celts? They're BADASSES!
th-cam.com/video/qxoob_XD7Ik/w-d-xo.html
RUDE NAUGHTY
How is "Celtic" defined here? By language, culture, or origins?
3:29 How did the name Jutland come from? Cuz there is whole tribe of Jatts in north western India.
What a blessing to have this valuable information! Thank you very much!
Amen!
Suggest you read Barry Cunliffe's book(s), he doesn't claim the celts were descended from tribes migrated around the Black sea (the Indo-European languages may have). There was migration from there due to to eastward pressure (eg the Scythians), but it petered out on the Hungarian planes (and no evidence - grave goods, burial types etc - that they spread further west) , that was the eastern fringes of the celtic heartlands. Some celtic tribes/groups did migrate east to the Black sea area (Thrace etc) but were eventually wiped out. Some did successfully migrate to Turkey (the Galacians , as per the Bible book) and could be recognised as celtic for generations afterwards.
I have read a number of studies that discount celts as having distinct genetic markers in britain. Apparently we are much more diverse genetically than that. I think people conflate haplogroups with celtic culture. Studies have changed since 2005 re Oxford study. I would like know the latest haplo science on the subject. I think the roman writing on britain have got stuck. No one in britain called themselves celt. It's all interesting and much to learn.
Thank you Viewpoint
the evidence is strong and almost conclusive; the two branches of celts lived and departed from somewhere around the Black Sea, having contact with the peoples like Hittites, Assyrians and Egyptians that used the horses and war chariots. From there some migrated through Greece or the northern Africa where finally reached Spain.
Ki(
Chariots were developed around the Pontic Steppe (north of the Black Sea) and where all the genetic and linguistic evidence also points to for the origins of the Celtic peoples. This channel tends to ignore that view as it seeks to prop up the Anatolian thesis for some reason. I believe their adherence to this theory (which has largely been rejected by academia) is because the organisation is pushing Christian propaganda (check out their website if you're curious -- they are not an objective source on any of this).
Many people in various disciplines (and outside of those same disciplines) contend that "academia" is by definition not scientific, is largely based on unexpressed and unproven assumptions, and vociferously protects their sources of funding, academic positions they may have, and their academic chairmanships. Sounds like "propaganda.
Research the Electric Universe Model on TH-cam. It is not the standard "scientific propaganda". And it has been successfully tested in the physics laboratory.
@@wodenravenschariots originated in Messopatamia, first used by the Sumer civilization. To my knowledge the Yamnaya people's never used them.
Interesting... It seems that no matter which parts of my ancestry you want to follow, 3/4 of them lead back to the Thracians and the Black sea.
"Your ancestry" ! if you trace back to the time of the celts, about 2000 years ago, you potentially have over 1000 trillion, trillion trillion ( that's 1 followed by 30 x 0s) ancestors. That's far more people than have ever existed, even far more stars than astronomers calculate in the entire universe,. Even if you're a Yank, or an Australian, , your ancestry will likely include every tribe in Europe. I'm not having a go at you - I'm Welsh myself, but people fail to grasp the maths involved: numbers double every generation. Geneticists reckon all Europeans have a common ancestor in the 15th century (AD) - that's only 500 years ago (and they think she was a German)
@@philldavies7940 Phil, I am afraid the idea that all Europeans descend from a common ancestor 500 years ago is absurd. Please provide a scientific reference for this claim.
100% of mine do.
@@philldavies7940 maths dont double every generation. Theres also incest and generations skipped it wasn't uncommon to have a mom have sex with her grandson. And things like that. This cuts down the number of peopme you're related too. Although only mens fathers dna passes to them and womens dna passes to them.
@@philldavies7940, about a third of my direct ancestors are American Indians... and a full half are Germanic... the rest come from Ireland.
So as far as who I may or may not be related to goes... it is indeed a large group.
...though I doubt it's quite as large as you seem to think. 😉
( I don't buy that bible-thumping B.S. that claims we all came from just 2 people. )
Oh, and "Potential" is a far cry from "actual".
Remember what Mark Twain said: "Figures lie and liars figure."
Don't forget the Belgian Celts crossing the channel to England.
Great video. He mentioned that this was a time when a man's word meant something. To some of us, it still does. My grandfather and father both preached that a man's word is his honor. Not sticking to your word is dishonorable, and in the end that's all we have besides our flesh. A poor man who sticks to his word is infinitely more wealthy than a man who lies and does not.
I have Scottish on my mothers side, and my from my father I have Irish, Asian and Middle Eastern. From both I also have other European DNA. So if the Celts really did come from the Middle East then if I add my Irish and Scottish DNA with my Middle Eastern DNA then that should technically make me approximately 1 quarter Middle Eastern. Hmmm... Guess I have more research to do instead of just taking info from one source.
This lad is talking absolute nonsense. I wouldn't make any decisions based on him. You're right. Hes lying.
Even since the tome of the celts (about 2000 years ago) you potentially have more descendant than grains of sand on the world (do the maths), => don't read too much into your DNA, you;ll have DNA from everywhere.
I agree with both of you! That's why I try to fact check as much as possible. I kept scratching my head watching this video because it just didn't seem to fall in line with accuracy...
Yoy have no middle eastern dna from the scots or Irish. You lose ancient ancient dna.
The DNA test only goes back 10 generations
Newgrange in the Boyne Valley Complex, Ireland... would have been 2000 plus years old when the Celts arrived - but yes, it is interesting but Neolithic not very late Bronze, Early to mid Iron Age.. :))))
OMG THANK YOU
i`m an english major specialising in cross-cultural communication and this is so much better than listening to our professors lmao
This Is A Conservative Platform Please Refrain From Contradictory Phrases.
Another idea has the Celts coming from the Middle East (may explain the Hebrew like inscriptions) either passing from Sythia or from there or perhaps a mixture of peoples on the move from different areas?
Do we know when his book will be published and does he have a website or blog?
I am afraid there is no blog, but the book is about 2 years away. 10 years invested so far....
Barry Cunliffes books are publisshed. Read them
The tracians have chariots,horses and buried their nobles in huge tombs with frescoes .They were great goldsmiths too!
It would be a bit like saying that Minoan Crete was attributable to the early Athenians.. or that they had some connection. They probably, possibly did, but it was the other way around :))))
Why would you down vote this knowledge?
But there are British chariots dating back to 3000b.c ?
I do not believe so. The oldest chariot found to date in the UK is the Newbridge chariot, radiocarbon dated between 475-380 BC.
See what happens when you point out inconvenient truths? The 'Celts' is a lie. Invented 1714 . This gobshite is obfuscating settlement by Syrians and displaced Trojans.Both of whom were metalworkers and mound burial builders. You are correct.
So who are they
Amazing! Can't wait to read to book
Hi there, May i ask where do u think u will go when u die u dont have to answer if u dont want to?
I just did my DNA test and it shows that I am English , a bitt Scot and a bit Irish and my English bit is yorkshire and Essex. But I am brown eyed and dark hair. I always felt like I came from a warm country. I look more mediteranneon . May be I am Celt. Don't know how you find out. The DNA test only goes back 10 generations. That is to maybe 1700. And I am always cold. Shouldn't I be blond blue eyed and tall?
I'm the same. Very olive tan. Rh neg blood and my ancesters migrated from Britain to the middle east and then back again. Known as 10 of the 12 lost tribes. Not lost at all. They left an alphabet and a cypher for us to re-learn what has been hidden and lost. Ceaser described our alphabet and said the Greeks got their alphabet from the Brits.
Any proof of celtic speach in Central Europe?
There are some inscription in northern Italy in proto-celtic...
History PROVES the Canaanites migrated to Europe: It is true that Canaanite Phoenicians migrated to Europe in large numbers in ancient times, there must be religious and cultural ties, and in fact, such connections abound. Dr. Thomas Moore's, History of Ireland(p. 40), relates:
"That most common of all Celtic monuments, the Cromlech... is to be found not only in most parts of Europe, but also in Asia," including eastern Mediterranean. Not less ancient and general, among the Celtic nations, was the circle of upright stones, with either an altar or tall pillar in the centre, and, like its prototype at the temple of Byblos, Phoenicia, Gilgal [ancient Israel], serving sometimes as a temple of worship, sometimes as a place of national council or inauguration... The rough, unhewn stone...used in their circular temples by the Druids. Dr. Beauford, in Druidism Revived, says, "It is remarkable that all the ancient altars found in Ireland, and now distinguished by the name of Cromlechs or sloping stones, were originally called Bothal, or the House of God, and they seem to be of the same species as those mentioned in the Book of Genesis, called by the Canaanites, Bethel, or discovered in Byblos, Phoenicia, which has the same signification as the Irish Bothal." The Bible (Judges 9:6; 2Ki. 11:14; 2 Chon. 23:13) indicates that Phoenician kings were crowned either standing upon or next to a pillar of stone. "The practice of seating the new king upon a stone, at his initiation, was the practice in many of the countries of Europe.... The monarchs of Sweden sat upon a stone placed in the centre of twelve lesser ones, and in a similar kind of circle the Kings of Denmark were crowned." (Moore, ibid., p. 42) Note also the significant Bible number, 'twelve', which was common to both European Celts and the Phoenicians.
The Jig Is Up Canaan!
Where is Ophir?
TGC.
I do not think anyone knows for sure the exact location of Ophir. The archaeological study bible writes this: “Ophir was a source for gold (2Ch 8:18; Job 28:16; Ps 45:9; Isa 13:12), almugwood and precious stones (1Ki 10:11), as well as silver, ivory, apes and baboons (10:22). Suggestions for its location include southeastern Arabia, southwestern Arabia and the northeastern African coast. If Ophir was located in Arabia, it was probably a trading center for goods from farther east, as well as from east Africa. But the three-year voyages of Solomon’s merchant vessels (10:22) suggest a more distant location than the Arabian coast.” I think this last statement is correct, and that Ophir must be much further away than Arabia. Almug wood has been identified by some as White Sandalwood of India, a native of the mountainous parts of the Malabar coasts. It is a fragrant wood used in China for incense in idol-worship. Others think that it was the Indian red Sandalwood (Pterocarpus Santalinus) a heavy, fine-grained wood found on the Coromandel coast and in Ceylon. So based on the wide range of commodities and animals mentioned in the scriptures above, Ophir is likely in India or elsewhere in the far east.
Well it is iberia not spain most of the kelts , celts , gaels ,galics and so on lived in the portuguese part of iberia from the botom until gaelecia which was also a part of portugal . It is said that irish and scotish nobility came from iberia but they are descendent crossbreed from the middle eastern galatas with the native europeans along the way
Gaelecia divided into two kingdoms North and South. The South separated from the North and created a new country and called it Portugal.
Lusitanians were proto-Celtic. The Celtiberians were spread throughout the Western portions of the Peninsula - and most of that was within the boarders of modern Spain. (Basques, Iberians, Aquitaines, Greco-Phoenicians, etc. were found along the eastern portions, boarding the Mediterranean). The Celtiberians who held out against Roman subjugation and cultural assimilation were the Astur and Cantabrian tribes in the northern Atlantic coast of Spain.
Ana Merkurieff Indeed and both Galicia and Portugal have been identified as the regions of Iberia with the lowest levels of traceable Celtic genes and highest degree of Berber admixture (much of which is traced to the Moors; some of which is linked to Neolithic migration, Roman occupation, etc.). The latest genetic studies have shifted the traditional paradigm regarding the Islamic legacy in Iberia - to an East-West model for Moorish admixture, as opposed to the traditional North-South model.
I is said by who? (not including yourself). Its not a claim I;ve read in any reputable (or disreputable) source.
Proto Celts were neolitic Anatolian farmers
This is so cool, Celtic as a fusion of many different sources coming together to create a wonderful culture. Not as convinced about the “medieval nobles’ words are sacred” thing, lot of evidence to think they were more calculating and cutthroat than that lol
"The Oera Linda" details it all quite well. They were all from the same people in the North Atlantic. After a large catastrophe(the flood) they colonized all over the maritime world. The Northern branch used the rivers to move from the Black Sea to Europe, and eventually became the Skythians. The Southern branch sailed around the Iberian Peninsula and into the Mediterranean, and eventually became known as the Phoenicians.
Eventually many of them migrated back to their motherland.
Where would you place the Picts in Caledonia (Scotland) are they the remnants of the original invading celts or a tribe from Scandinavia??? As we know the Scotii (Scots) were a tribe from Scotia (Hibernia) that washed up on the shores of today's Ireland.
I always get confused between the Celitberians and the other Celts in France, Germany and Brtiton. They are similar correct? But different? Hmmm
You are correct. Celtiberians are just one flavor of Celts (their name is just a combination of Celt + Iberia which is the ancient name for what we know as Spain and Portugal today. There were remarkable similarities in the cultures of various Celtic tribes, but there were also regional variations.
The celtaberians we're a mix of hamitic Iberian people's and cymry , Celtic in Koine, Greek means barbarian. They were shorter in stature and with a tan.
@@gumpg8735 Iberia is directly named after the Celts..Kelti was a Greek word they used to name the ppl leaving the Levant after an Assyrian invasion..these migrating ppl called themselves H'Iberi or H'Iberu,the root word for the English Transliteration word Hebrew..Ha is the Hebrew word for THE but was shortened to H'...like what happens with O'Farrell or O'Connor..the Irish have genetic markers for the Iberian Peninsula and Nth Africa..
@@deanlonagan1475 Which reminds me, an Irish youtuber I've been subscribed to for a while took a DNA test a few years back and had a small percentage of Iberian ancestry, if I recall correctly: th-cam.com/video/wdL1FN3_YMo/w-d-xo.html
Just figured I'd share.
This is the third,, forth opinion fron different so called expert's, about this issue I've listened to today. We are human mongrels ✊☘️
They are one of the oldest Indo Iranian Groups
Disappointing to see the well recorded migration of the Cymru (pronounced Kum-ree) referred to by the Greeks as the Kimmeroi is not mentioned at all. The Cymru settled in South Wales where the people and language still has that name. The interviewee mentioned Nenius but seemed to forget to mention that he was Cymric/Welsh and that he described the arrival of the Welsh from Troy around 500AD. He also mentions chariots being used but not that complete chariots of the period have discovered buried in Wales.
Considering Wales has detailed historical records of this period along with enscribed stones showing details and archeological finds to support the arrival it is mystifying why it never gets mentioned. Check out the britainshiddenhistory Facebook group and youtube channel if you would like to see more of the evidence being discussed - with Wales included.
The writing shown also looks to be the old British/Cymric Coelbren writing.
Thanks for your comment BHH Ross. You are correct about the Welsh role in the history of the Celts. We did not not intentionally overlook the Welsh, their omission was only one of time constraints. These videos are limited to c. 10 minutes! This is a very big subject as you know, and this video is meant only as an introduction to the subject. In fact, the Welsh play a pivotal role in the Iron Age migrations to Britain and the spread of Celtic culture in the west. I expend a great deal of ink in my upcoming book on Welsh origins and migrations, including their connections to ancient Troy. The archaeological evidence found in Wales for these events is massive, as you point out. Indeed, chariots are only one of several 'smoking guns' connecting the Celts with the ancient Near East.
@@gumpg8735 Thanks - that sounds great. Especially keen to see what you have on the migrations. What is the book? I would like a copy.
How do you see the Cymru as Celtic? The original Keltii were a tribe in Southern France and the first references I can find to the Welsh, Irish or Scottish being "Celtic" to have been made at the beginning of the 18th Century by Edward Lhuyd.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lhuyd
@@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss Well, the book is probably still 2 years from publication. I am working on chapter 17/19 as we speak, but I will definitely let you know when it is nearing the light of day! As for the term Celt, I mainly use it as a descriptor of culture. Celtic culture, according to the traditional model, first becomes apparent in the Danube corridor around eighth century BC. Their traditional homeland was identified as the Hallstatt region in what is today Austria. Celtic culture begins spreading north and west from there until it becomes evident throughout most of western Europe. It evolves over time for many reasons, becoming what archaeologists call La Tene, materials of which again appear all over western Europe and Britain. So, Celtic material covers an awful big swathe of time and territory. The most recent research indicates that the earliest Celts appeared in southwest Spain, not Austria. Certainly the oldest Celtic inscriptions to date are found in Spain, which is interesting because of the Welsh and Irish legendary connections to Spain (not to mention the recent genetic linkages). The term Celt can be misleading, and is sometimes used for various political purposes that do not hold a lot of water. The term actually predates the Roman Empire. It was first used by Roman observers to classify the European tribes they encountered into two main groups: Germanii and Gauls (with a far-too-convenient line along the Rhine River separating them). The phoneme ‘Gal’ remains to this day across Europe: Portugal, Gallia in France, Galicia in Spain and Poland, and even Galatia in Turkey. The Greeks referred to the Gauls as Keltoi, or Celts. The first written instance of the word Keltoi is found in a seventh century BC sailing manual, the Massilliot Periplus, in which Keltoi were described living beyond the tin-producing areas of the Atlantic seaboard. The Greek geographer Hecataeus (c.550-490 BC) was also familiar with the Keltoi. Hope this helps. Thanks again for your comments.
did my ancestry & am 93% Celt & 5% Iran/Turkish which kind of backs up what he's saying
Turks are mongols, the celts have more common with Kurds.
@@yurichtube1162I am only repeating my results but I can see what your saying could be true, in preference I would prefer Kurd DNA to Turkish lol
No, you’re just a half-breed
@@yurichtube1162 kurds are afro semitic origin Turks so Anatolians are Hittite Luwian origin
@Cymro 65 the Welsh appeared to be from Germany they were allies of the gauls in the wars against the Romans they had other enemies. Hundreds of hill forts were abandoned with no clue to where they went but ap hywel , clan was the biggest land owners in the south of Britain. And allotted them land may Gus father of welsh married a daughter of the royal lowothen clan.
Funny how Fire of Learning and Mr. Z released an alternate history on celts on the same day.
This isn't alternate
What is this channels deal with pushing a warped history about the Celts? The spread of Celtic started from the Upper Danube; movements of them have been documented by Greek and Roman sources coming out of this area not from the Lower Danube. Celts only started spreading northwards in Europe after their ousting from the Balkan area from the Greeks and the collapse of the original Hallstatt homeland from currently unknowns pressures. The establishment of a Celtic cultural continuum from current day Moldova to Northern Europe is something that has quite a bit of reputable evidence behind it. Celts; like many other Indo-European cultures venerated cavalry so the tie between them and the Thracian in this regard is not unique nor directly related between the two parties. Lastly Tartessian Language and culture is not accepted as Celtic with the Mosas Do Castolino not even considered to be Indo-European. This is besides the fact the the material culture of the area is much more akin to Mediterranean artifacts than anything from Northern Europe. Please stop pushing this false narrative and read the actual literature on the subject before making these videos.
You are correct that the Celts spread out from the Hallstatt area of the Upper Danube. Over the course of a few hundred years they spread into almost every part of Europe, establishing the ‘Celtic cultural continuum’ that you mention. Nothing in this clip suggests otherwise. It seems, however, that you have overlooked the central question: Where did this Celtic culture originate in the first place? If you adhere to the anti-migrational theories that arose in the 1960s, you would say that the Celts simply evolved from the Urnfield People that dominated central Europe for centuries prior to the Hallstatt era. But this is becoming increasingly untenable. First, ancient-DNA studies are rapidly debunking the idea that large scale migrations never occurred in the past. Second, it is highly unlikely that Hallstatt’s advanced equine-based culture arose organically. As a former horse owner, I can attest to the steep learning curve associated with becoming a competent horseman. Yet Hallstatt C appears relatively suddenly in Europe - complete with a package of highly advanced equine knowledge and war fighting capabilities. Where did they acquire this knowledge? Barry Cunliffe describes these tribes as horse riding aristocracies. Can it be a coincidence that a few weeks’ journey down the Danube corridor, on shores of the Black Sea, was a region crowded with tribes that could only be described as horse-riding aristocracies? Your suggestion that Tartessian is not accepted as Celtic is dated. I would suggest picking up a copy of the 3-volume Celtic From the West series from Oxbow publishing in Oxford. It is a great survey of the most cutting-edge research regarding the Celts. Contributors include some of the leading academics in Europe including Barry Cunliffe, John Koch, Raimund Karl and others. Dr. John Koch has analyzed hundreds of Tartessian inscriptions, concluding that they represent the earliest written form of Celtic found so far, easily predating scripts found in central Europe. Koch concludes outright that a group of proto-Celts arrived in southwest Spain by sea, bringing new burial practices, weapons, and even chariots along for the ride. In other words, these proto-Celts, and by extension, components of early Celtic culture in Spain, came from somewhere. Your comment that the Tartessian culture was more Mediterranean than northern European is also correct. That the Tartessians may not be Indo-European at all makes Koch’s findings even more compelling. Especially his realization that the Tartessian language was interacting with and being modified by a Semitic language like Hebrew. You have connected some dots. In fact, there are Near Eastern substrates detectable in the cultures of both the eastern European Celts (Hallstatt and La Tene), and the early Celts of SW Spain.
Gump G The celtic haplogroups are classified as a sub-branch of haplogroup R. This fits the model of expansion forming from the North via the Eurasian Steppe. The model of expansion that is put forth here is a northwestward expansion via the Mediterranean and Danube that started from the Levant. No evidence via archaeology, genetics or linguistics supports this notion. Celtic culture from what can be currently reconstructed; expanded from Central Europe outwards in all directions expect for directly northwards and eventually culminated in being concentrated in Northwestern Europe.
Now that being said high distributions in pockets in Iberia, it is safe to assume a diffusion into these areas from the north rather than the south. This is supported by the adoption of Celtic place names that have been identified in Tartessian along with other Indo-European influences despite the languages’ structure as a whole being considered to be much closer to Old European languages. Another factor that supports this is the recognition of the Atlantic Bronze complex which shows that contact between peoples across the Atlantic coast of Europe had been established. Diffusion through the Mediterranean and Atlantic shores of Europe from the north in waves has much more support than the route portrayed in this video.
@@anthropologicalminds2855 You're incorrect to state that "No evidence via archaeology, genetics or linguistics supports this notion." British historian Alan Wilson was the first to translate a scroll found with the Dead Sea Scrolls in Qumran. He translated it because he knew Welsh Coelbren. The ancient language in Britain had 4000 words in common with Hebrew, including Brit which means covenant and ish which means man. British in Hebrew means covenant man. Welsh Coelbren inscriptions are all along the migration routes between the Levant and the British and Irish Isles, found in Mediterranean Islands as well as Turkey and Northern Italy. Celts are Israelites as the Scots declared in the Declaration of Arbroath. There were several migrations of Israelites to Britain and Ireland, using more than one route, although the most common route was probably by ship through the Mediterranean Sea.
@@anthropologicalminds2855 Another thing, Alan WIlson could read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics because using his Welsh Coelbren knowledge, he could read an inscription written by Moses (Mosheh), an Israelite, in Egypt that explains how to read hieroglyphics. That links the Welsh language to Egypt and the Israelites who moved there in Israel's (formerly known as Yaakov aka Jacob) time, when Israel's son Yosef (aka Joseph) was second in charge to Pharoah in Egypt during a great famine.
musiqman Alan Wilson and his cohorts are the definition of charlatans. No independent evaluation of their work has been made available for peer review research nor have they provided anything convincing. Tell Alan to organize his best arguments and thoughts into a coherent paper with access to his claimed artifacts. Shouldn’t be too hard if he has spent decades arguing for his viewpoint.
Why always one looks for Germany-Austria?
Well known history - Celtics are South-Western pre-Georgians
accompanied South Iberians, leaving Planes of Ararat,
invaded by Urartu-Chaldea.
It started 15 Century BC and continued for Centuries from
other parts of pre-Georgia.
They intermarried with locals, Galics and others. common
name was later used as Celtic...
Language was pre-Georgian group, that also was used by
Israelites,
Which later forgot it and changed it, mixing with Chaldean
Sara…
“Ba Ra He Ai Diah O Ahi ai” they chaged to “Boruh Ato
Adonay…”
How did you learn this?
Lay off the drugs.
Nostradamus without proverbial testicles.
So who built Stonehenge?
If 800 bc is after Stonehenge
What a mystery
Stonehenge predates the Celts by a very long time span. Stonehenge was built around 5,500 years ago in a period called the Neolithic, rough;y 2,000 years before Celts appeared in Europe.
The beaker people, who were descend from the original hunter gathers who entered the UK after the last ice age ended about 10,000 BC. The British "celts" were probably just descended from them.
@@philldavies7940 Your information is dated. I suspect you have a copy of Stephen Oppenheimer's 2007 book: 'The Origins of the British' on your shelf. I am nearing the conclusion of a book in excess of 1,000 pages that will prove beyond any doubt that the Celts are not descended from the Beaker people. Ancient DNA alone shows several examples of complete population replacements in Europe by eastern migrants in the Neolithic. The Beaker people were replaced by an entirely new people with more advanced technology and a completely different culture centuries after this. I'll send you a copy of the book when it is published.
@@philldavies7940 the Bell Beaker People were not descended from the indigenous hunter gathers and they didn't build Stonehenge. The Bell Beaker People came from Europe and replaced the farming people who built Stonehenge. The indigenous hunter gathers were replaced by the farming people who built Stonehenge.
@@gumpg8735 this new people were the Celts, who came from the Pontic Steppes around 4.000 BC and 2.500 BC. They were R1b and replaced previous populations by 90%.
See David Reich's ancient DNA research published in 2018.
Weren’t the biblical Galatians Celts?
Yes! You are correct. The Greeks referred to the Gauls as Keltoi, or Celts. The 'Gal' in Galatia is the same phoneme that is seen in Portugal, Gallia in France, Galicia in Spain and Poland, and Galatia in modern Turkey (the Galatians of biblical times). They actually migrated back to Turkey from western Europe.
Yes absolutely truth
@@gumpg8735 Galati city in Romania.
I received my DNA results. I'm Middle Eastern. I've always been, however, obsessed with Irish folk music. Now, I know why!
you should check out this documentary - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantean_(film_series)
The Black Sea, Turkey etc... isn't really the Middle East though.
Listen to the wolftones TAL
mmm, I'm not sure that would hold up to any sort of scientific scrutiny.. I quite like Simon and Garfunkel's condor, that doesn't; mean my family comes from Peru !!
@@AP-pl5rv of course not. It's neighbouring the Pontic steppe.
By facial correterstic they seem to be of amixed stock people of Assyrians as well as Jewish orrigion from some where between Caspian and black sea
Ripath genealogy mentioned in the bible was the father of the the cimmerians would have married the granddaughter of shem son of Noah.
They were from troy
Jan Pearson, no they were not lost tribes of Israel , this is talking far older than that period so we rule that Out.
These people they were Hebrew people the oldest people on the earth they come from YEMEN , there is where are coming from.
The writing that you showed from South of SPAIN is in SABEAN language is the same people the Hebrew, the Phoenician is the same people the Hebrew, they are soo many tribe took different ways to form in New settlement. These people they were the first people to use IRON .
These people are the first human immigration they were just just travelling just going, just passing through.
Hebrew meaning ( PASSING THROUGH )
I have Celt & pict ancestry.
Strange only around 7% of my people have the pictish dna 🤔
"ERENN" is EreAni, meaning Era and People, era of the people...
Don't talk nonsense. You do know that Irish people aren't folk lore creatures and we do exist n do see you making up crap about us right?
You haven't a clue
Suuuuuperrrrrr coooooooool!!!!!!!!
Gaul=Galatae=Celitae. Celtic culture and languages were formed in situ, circa 2700-1900 bce, in Spain, Armorica, Wales, Ireland. The culture, language, and original Celtic aristocracy pushed their identity eastwards between 1900-1000 bce. It took 1000s of years to form Celtic language and identity during the Bronze Age. IE languages were planted along Atlantic-Europe by the western IE steppe people (“Scythians”) between 2700-1900 bce. The Hallstatt La Tene was the last phase (an Iron Age) of a long Celtic Age, this phase transmitted by a dynastic warrior-elite class, it was not the beginnings of a new “Celtic Culture.” Celtic society formed on the coasts of Atlantic-Europe during the Late Copper, Early Bronze Age.
There is 2000 years between the hallstatt culture and the arrival of the steppe people with their horses and chariots in mid europe. Trading routes were established long time. Amber from the black sea is found in old egypt and bronze and silver from the levante in scandinavia.
You are partially correct. Hallstatt culture does predate the arrival of the horse riding aristocracies, they are referred to as the Urnfield Culture in this video for that is a more recognizable term. Technically, the Urnfield People are classified as Hallstatt A and B, they live during the Late Bronze Age. The Urnfield - Hallstatt transition occurs in the ninth century BC with the appearance of Hallstatt C, the beginning of the Iron Age (and the appearance of the horse riding aristocracies from the east). Read Iron Age Communities in Britain (pg. 447) by Professor Barry Cunliffe. He writes: “The beginning of what can be reasonably called the Iron Age in Europe is linked to the development of the Hallstatt Culture, characterized by the appearance of a horse-riding aristocracy using a long slashing sword and frequently burying their dead in timber-built tombs beneath barrows”. I suppose Hallstatt C should have been identified, but again, it is necessary to summarize much in a short video like this. That said, Hallstatt A does not predate Hallstatt C by 2000 years. Not even close. Hallstatt A begins only around 1200 BC.... 400 years prior to the arrival of horse riding aristocrats, at the most.
@@gumpg8735 The horse people with chariots arrived in europe about 3500 bc. Dont know for they did horseriding already. In the next 2000 years they mixed with the local people and spread their language. The languag(es) started to move away from each other and formed the later slavik, germanic and celtic and italic languages. The Hallstatt or LaTene culture started not before 2000 bc rather about 1500 bc. the Hallstatt people had in the east mainly small villages with sometimes wooden palisades. In the west they had from some time on kind of castles or fortresses on a hill above a city what indicates a nobility. That is documented by the romans. We dont know much about the 2000 years between the arrival of horses in middle europe and hallstatt. Even from the gauls and germanic tribes we only know so much through the roman and greek eyes. The celts and germans or slavs had nothing written down. Maybe a far echo can be seen in the nordic saga.
So if the Arabs went West it's fair to say Jesus was European and moved East or at least his mother did who was holy Mary mother of God
..why does no one go further back than Eastern Europe or Scythia for Celt migration when there is evidence for migration further back..to Israel in fact and the Lower Nile before then and finally to Mesopotamia where that group of different ppls who migrated to and took the Lower Nile originally came from..they have been called many names..Hyksos,H'Iberu(the root word for Hebrew)Israelite,Kelti,Gaul,Gael and Scotti..but now we just call them fekkin Paddies..
I have done this research and found the same. Also the links in the Bible with the book of Hosea and how the tribes would be known as “Gomer”. You’re correct though, and the artwork of the Hyskos and Habirus show them with zkitzkits clearly identifies who they were
heh. I am H1B and I hate horses! I was bitten when I was a child and never trusted them again. The Kurgan also inhabited the lands around the Black Sea.
th-cam.com/video/ZHMiPYviPPQ/w-d-xo.html
Mr. Gibson: How much of the information that you speak is attributed to anti-Celtic Propaganda? Let's be objective here...
Sure, he quotes Nennius, his «Historia Britonnum» who made up loads of things, and lived at least 5 to 3.000 years after the arrival of the Celts to Western Europe.
He pronounced the Lebor Gabála Érenn like shite. Also many things in these books of Leinster are historically inaccurate, just written too late for an oral traditional society like the Celtic.
For old historians often invented fantastic origins to their peoples.
These points together take out any chance of credibility to his explanations.
They were the ‘Andites’, the remnants of the Adamites; blue/green eyed with blond, brown and red hair. Ref. The Urantia Book.
I have always thought through the little research that I have done that the Celts were part of the ten northern tribes of Israel that were dispersed
Celts come from the East side of the Black Sea from the mountains of Ararat. Noah's Ark.
According to the Bible EVERYONE came from there.
After the flood.
Finix not phoenicians
Well dna shows that scots are not celts
The celts are in england
the so called scots were irish migrants
You're right Denis this lad is a complete clown. Scot is just the Latin word for Irish.
Did you hear the hames he made of saying the book of invasions? Can you imagine someone saying they are an expert in our culture who doesn't even know how to say 3 words in our language.
Why "so called" ? The Scotti were a tribe, Scotland is just named after them.
@@philldavies7940 the scotti weren't a tribe. The dal riadans were the tribe that settled Scotland.
Scotti was the latin word for Irish and scottorum was the latin for Ireland
@@philldavies7940 there's also the fact that Scotland like all countries has a multi ethnic indigenous culture. Scots people are only 1 ethnicity and there's been centuries of sectarian violence between them and the Gaelic ethnicity. So being called a scot doesn't go down well with everyone
@@ByrneMJames when he started talking about Scots I kind of lost all trust in everything he said. The Scots are quite a recent nation. A thousand years ago the people of Scotland were many different ethnicities including Picts, Britons, Anglo Saxons, Scotti and Norwegian.
The dispersal of humanity at the tower of Babel makes perfect sense of this evidence. Just one more suggestion that the Bible is historically accurate and can therefore be trusted to be accurate in spiritual matters as well
Sorry no the bible is historical the Talmud is the original source however the New is more of legends and mythology before you criticise look how many pagan symbols have been hijacked into Christian dogma and ceremonies we worship pantheons not monolithic. The bible for me as a child was a great source of joy however to quote "when I was a child I spoke as a child " we are no longer children until the Vatican releases definitive credibility my bible is used as a reference on my historical/fiction shelf
Mick the story hes taking about isn't biblical. It just references the bible. Its no more history than Dan browns books.
The story was written by some great medieval writers and its an incredible complex bit of European high literature but its just a story.
There was this thing called the carolingian world chronical. Or the chron of eusebius or prosper of aquitaine. It tried to legitimatise the holy roman empire by showing Gods guiding hand in setting it up.
The chronical is like a spreadsheet with all the great countries kings dying n being replaced at the same times in history. Until constantine has his revelation on the road to damascus and from then on all the kings bend their knee to the man leading gods people.
It meant that medieval people could glance at the pages and see that the holy roman empire was a part of Gods plan for humanity. But we didn't have one ruler there were 150 kingdoms here n it messed up the spreadsheet. So they openly wrote a pseudo history to fit us in.
The lad in this video is either lying to sell his book or he genuinely hasn't got a clue. It's not just that he doesn't know Irish history and cant pronounce 3 words in our language the right way. Hes treating different countries as if they're generic across thousands of years of time.
He definitely isnt a man that lives by the Bible.
A lot of inexact and missing information, the world and the science has progressed big time since the times of this celt germanic myths,. There is a lot of history ignored before and after the Romans in places like France, the Italy and Spain and Al, and all the genomic science for example the Y chromosome dna from the times of the yamnaya culture back on the bronze age.
They all believed that stuff cos they were scots Catholics taught their education by rome.
Today scots and irish are not celts
The greeks used to sail there around 9000bc
Could these Celtics people be the decedents of Jacob's 10 boys who knew war with the horse & chariot of their Egyptian captivity & then from those days of concurring the promise land. As these families grew into powerful fighting men who founded the 10 Northern Tribes & later to be driven from the land by God for their disobedience, using the Assyrian. Who took them North to the boundaries of the Assyrian Empire reached as far as the Caucasus Mountains. & Latter crossing over the Caucasus's into Europe these Isaacs sons who some called Scythians & later to be call Caucasians.
Celts
Newgrange and the Boyne Valley "monuments" predate "Celts" by about 2000 years or so.. and anything Biblical to pre Exodus, - well over 1500 years before Hittites, Babylonians, Assyrians etc.. 1 to 1.5k older than current dating on the pyramids.. so Celts and any connection to anything British Isles, pre Classical Greek, early Roman, Etruscan is a bit like saying that the Early Normans may have participated in the American Civil War..
Culture & artifacts are not people or their genetics. People with the Y-DNA (R1b-M269 and subclades) and the autosomal DNA (lactase persistence, hemochromatosis, light complexion/eyes, etc, that are common among present-day western Europeans as opposed being uncommon among the largely supplanted Old European hunter-gatherers & farmers) of Indo-Europeans from the Pontic Steppe near the Black Sea have been in Ireland and the British Isles (the NW extreme extent of their travels and migrations) since the end of the third millennium BCE (early Bronze Age), Amesbury Archer, Rathlin 1, 2 & 3, etc. From isotopic (strontium/oxygen) analysis, they came up the Rhine River valley and crossed the English Channel. In all likelihood they spoke Proto-Indo-European dialects that would have been found from eastern Europe to the Atlantic fringe of Europe, each interacting to a greater and lesser extents with the local Old-European-/non--Indo-European-speakers, and with expected local/regional linguistic evolution, representing local/regional variations with more or less mutual intelligibility among them. Q-Celtic was spoken in Iberia, Ireland & NW Britain. P-Celtic was spoken from the rest of Britain, France and across much of trans-alpine Europe for two millennia before the Roman conquests. Iron Age artifacts of Celtic cultures like Halstatt, La Tène & Tartesso, represent, as do any such cultural horizons, innovations by Celtic groups in their locality. Their artifacts and technology spread through trade, travel and migration. These cultural innovation do not represent the origin of the Celts, any more than the invention of bourbon whiskey in the 18th-century Ohio River Valley represents the origin of the Scotch-Irish/Ulster Scots people. Watch these: th-cam.com/video/rg0hr87Adok/w-d-xo.html, th-cam.com/video/G8FM9nMFbfI/w-d-xo.html & th-cam.com/video/Ub5izFOdtDs/w-d-xo.html
That would be my ancestors I am r1b rm269
the declaration of arbroath does not referr to the scots as celts. Neither nennius nor bede nor gildas ever talked about celts in the british isles.All invented by edward lluyd in 1700.
But Tacitus wrote that the Britons spoke a very similar language to that of the Gauls. Often the same tribal and personal names, place names, geographic names. Often same gods, art styles, war practices and weapons (Carnyx, javeline, broad swords, chain mail). Similar religion (Druids, Bards, Vates, sacred boards as martial symbols and horses worship).
They were all Celts.
The truth is the origin of The Celts is unknown. And someone else describing the same geographic area will replace The Celts with Germanic tribes or they overlap. Everybody seems to have a different story but nobody seems to really have any facts. And nothing could have originated with either The Celts or Germanic Tribes because both were peoples who migrated from someplace else. I mean for decades the story has been that European civilization was started by the immigration of The Greeks and The Romans. So how does the story of The Celts square with that?
..Kelti is a Greek word for ppl who called themselves H'Iberu, H'Iberi(Iberia,Iberian Peninsula) the root words for the English translation Hebrew..and the Germanics were an Assyrian ppl who also moved into Western Europe but on a more northerly route than the Celts..and there is a lot of evidence for where the Celts came from,you just need to learn it..youve learnt some of it here in these comments..notice a lot of the comments corroborate each other and add to the story..
@gearoid quirke I wasn't sure at first that you didn't know what you were talking about. But once you started quoting the Apocrypha I knew you went off the deep end.
@gearoid quirke What you believe is your opinion and nothing more. And just like butt holes, everybody has one.
@gearoid quirke Cheers, Gearoid Quirke. Be well.
....and this unknown culture is called Bulgarian, for uncomfort for many nations!
@fb369
Pax Romana product of deep state political establishment! 18 century onword!
WE ARE IRISH..WE WERE CELTS..!!!
The Celts were destroyed by the Roman Catholic Church based in Britain
It's really sick how you start talking history as an archeologist or historian, and then you start mumbling about Solomon and the "ancient Israel"...the bible is not a history book pal ,stop spreading lies for political reasons Assyrian, Egyptian, phoenician,Akkadians, Sumarian, Hittic, Babylon,Persian, Greeks and Romans are what you should be talking about when you want to discuss the History of the near east and mesopotamia..not the " powerfull chariots of Solomon"...yeah right...were Celts in your bible too speaking hebrew?
Mmmm. Interesting response. The very Assyrian records you speak of mention the Israelite chariot forces, as well as all the area to which they sent Israelite captives. A standing stone, excavated at the ancient Israelite city of Dan, mentions the House of David directly. Many... many more secular proofs available form the ancient world. Perhaps you will read of them in my book.... if you are courageous enough to face the facts with an open mind.
As for 'Hebrew speaking Celts'... You misunderstood my comments completely. First, it is ridiculous to talk of Celts in the bible. There weren't any. You need to understand how intermarriage and migration modify culture over time. But the fact that a Hebrew-like language, possibly Hebrew itself, influenced the development of the Celtic languages is now undisputed. Here is a quote from the renowned Welsh linguist, Professor John Koch, from the University of Wales: ""…it appears that an ancient Celtic language was directly and profoundly interacting with a Semitic language (one very similar to Hebrew, which has often been invoked in the Hamito-Semitic argument), and at the same time participating in innovations shared with the Celtic of Gaul, Britain, and Ireland” (emphasis mine). One possible explanation for this according to Dr. Koch is that a second group of “proto-Celtic” people had sailed west in addition to those that walked or rode from their Austrian homelands. - Paradigm Shift? Interpreting Tartessian as Celtic (Celtic from the West), Pgs. 192, 208;
So basically we’re all Jews and Asians and blacks are not?? 😭
@@gumpg8735 you wrote a book?
Phoenician is a proto Hebrew language.
Well seen, that is the most probable semitic language in the British lsles, through Tartessos and trade with Phoenicians and Carthaginians. Probably little groups of them which left a substrat in indoeuropean Celtic (the famous VSO). But Phoenician is not proto hebrew, albeit both can have a common proto semitic ancestor.
too much bla bla, stop beating it around the bush......Celts came from Hellenes!!!!! Tracians were of hellenic people1
We came from the Mongols, they were mad mental bastards too.
Allians
Magog
The Scottish nation? Mmmm!?
Ikr this guy knows nothing
Cymru Am Byth
@@ARMY2014 he couldn't even buy a clue for Christmas.
Scotland is a Nation, and it will be independent again, soon.
Why mmmmmmm?
@@richardlongues4695 still waiting 🤣🤣🤣🤣
NO FOREIGN NON ENGLISH PRONUNCUATION.
Nonsense!
Just as if Robert the Bruce had any idea where the Celts came from. This is pseudo history.
The Celts were the ten lost tribes of Israel.
That's a fairy story
Celts r ancient Arabs from Yemen
lol
I tihink the celts are the lost tribes of Israel.
The celts were many tribes, the Greeks use it to describe anybody coming from 'up north.