It’s not India’s loss. Didn’t the Indian forces do an excellent job in 1971 with whatever they had then, albeit a little obsolete? Now, local Indian companies are manufacturing an equivalent version.
Sir kindly change your narration. It's USA thrusting it's backdated product though our throat. We have much much technological better product in this segment.
Tata WhAP designed and made in India is superior to Stryker, and it is being exported to Morocco after extensive competitive trials where it beat out all competitors. The WhAP is superior because it is amphibious, has nuclear fallout and chemical weapons protection, modular, which the Stryker lacks, and more adaptable because it is designed in India by Tata/DRDO and is therefore much more adaptable and upgradable by India as India owns the design. The Stryker was offered to the Israelis by the US under the US military aid, and it was tested by the Israelis rejected it and called it junk. The Indian army selected the Striker even though it was inferior in specification and performance due to the fact that Stryker was an old, tested platform, which is an admission by the Indian Army that they were not competent to assess the platform themselves as the Moroccan armed forces did. The same weakness was shown by the Indian Army in the selection of the indigenous world beating ATAGS artillery where the Israeli Athos artillery piece was chosen over ATAGS initially because the Indian Army was unable to assess it properly and so chose the older inferior Athos artillery until the Armenian Army tested and purchased ATAGS, after which the Indian Army followed suite. It is a travesty that the Indian Army chose the Stryker in the first place - who knows why, maybe someone paid kickbacks to get it adopted. The Stryker is a Canadian designed and Canadian built APC made by a Canadian company that was taken over by US car company General Motors. Given that the Khalistani extremist Jasmeet Singh openly called for sanctions against India, it would be extremely stupid if India did not cancel the Stryker order immediately and replace it with the Tata WhAP or an alternative platform.
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
India should make the striker with its own technology...
Which is the Whap, Yes!
We should go for Indian made Whap to bring success for Atmanirbhar Bharat policy.
India shouldn't be stupid enough to buy the Stryker from Canada.
It’s not India’s loss. Didn’t the Indian forces do an excellent job in 1971 with whatever they had then, albeit a little obsolete? Now, local Indian companies are manufacturing an equivalent version.
Stop the deal on combat vehicles
Is Stryker better than the made in India TaTa Whap or Kalyani M4 armored vehicles?
No
Cancelling the deal is not the end of the world. Bharat should proceed with giving the order to domestic manufacturers
Dump it.❤
Good information 👍
Sir kindly change your narration. It's USA thrusting it's backdated product though our throat. We have much much technological better product in this segment.
Its a blessing for tata army vehicles
Yes. Tata Whap is the best. Ditch Stryker.
V.good we r facing these problems, it makes us more & more tough; this is a blessing in disguise.
Tata WhAP designed and made in India is superior to Stryker, and it is being exported to Morocco after extensive competitive trials where it beat out all competitors. The WhAP is superior because it is amphibious, has nuclear fallout and chemical weapons protection, modular, which the Stryker lacks, and more adaptable because it is designed in India by Tata/DRDO and is therefore much more adaptable and upgradable by India as India owns the design. The Stryker was offered to the Israelis by the US under the US military aid, and it was tested by the Israelis rejected it and called it junk.
The Indian army selected the Striker even though it was inferior in specification and performance due to the fact that Stryker was an old, tested platform, which is an admission by the Indian Army that they were not competent to assess the platform themselves as the Moroccan armed forces did. The same weakness was shown by the Indian Army in the selection of the indigenous world beating ATAGS artillery where the Israeli Athos artillery piece was chosen over ATAGS initially because the Indian Army was unable to assess it properly and so chose the older inferior Athos artillery until the Armenian Army tested and purchased ATAGS, after which the Indian Army followed suite.
It is a travesty that the Indian Army chose the Stryker in the first place - who knows why, maybe someone paid kickbacks to get it adopted. The Stryker is a Canadian designed and Canadian built APC made by a Canadian company that was taken over by US car company General Motors. Given that the Khalistani extremist Jasmeet Singh openly called for sanctions against India, it would be extremely stupid if India did not cancel the Stryker order immediately and replace it with the Tata WhAP or an alternative platform.
Well bring that manufacturing to India then !!
Pls cancel Stryker deal also Boycott Canada as well - !! Must go in for Indian Whap !!
Yes go for WAP
Sorry dear, its not hitting INDIA , rather its hurting CANADA & US. Pls change your version pls.
Dump the sryker, go for indigenous tanks.
Dump the Stryker