ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
ต่อไป
เล่นอัตโนมัติ
These Illusions Fool Almost EveryoneVeritasium
มุมมอง 2.4M
Dr. Agus on new football brain study: "This is a major issue"CBS Mornings
มุมมอง 2.2K
Migrant encounters at the US-Mexico border drop | VOANewsVoice of America
มุมมอง 36K
"ประวิตร" ฉุนจัดคุมตัวเองไม่อยู่ตบหัวสื่อ สังคมรุมประณามพฤติกรรมไม่เหมาะสม : Matichon TVmatichon tv
มุมมอง 585K
Try the #NewWomanChallenge now! Brought to you by YouTube Shorts #LISAxNewWomanLLOUD Official
มุมมอง 14M
ไฮไลท์ฟุตบอลพรีเมียร์ลีก 2024/25 สัปดาห์ที่ 1 : แมนเชสเตอร์ ยูไนเต็ด พบ ฟูแล่มTrueVisionsOfficial
มุมมอง 2M
Police pull over Florida state attorneyCBS News
มุมมอง 44M
Getting Settled at NSANSA Careers
มุมมอง 2.3K
Here’s Why You Don’t Pull a Saw on the CopsMN CRIME
มุมมอง 4.3M
The Most Painful Traffic Stop You'll Ever SeeCode Blue Cam
มุมมอง 6M
Good Cop Gets Bad Cop Fired and ArrestedAudit the Audit
มุมมอง 27M
How the CIA Stole a Russian Submarinefern
มุมมอง 1.2M
What I Don't Understand About Border Patrol CheckpointsJohn Stossel
มุมมอง 2.1M
Logo Matching Challenge with Alfredo Larin Family! 👍BigSchool
มุมมอง 14M
[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Playoffs Day 5 - FNC vs SENVALORANT Esports Thailand
มุมมอง 134K
ลุงตู่มาเหนือเมฆจริงๆทักษิณติดกับดักรัฐธรรมนญปี60แล้วจ่อโดนยุบพรรคอีกมอเตอร์ไซค์ อินดี้
มุมมอง 139K
พ่อขอกินไอติมคำนึงนะ!! #พ่อ #กินไอติม #ไอศครีม #นปโปะหม่ำๆ #shortsคิดดีทีวี | Kiddee TV
มุมมอง 411K
"แพทองธาร" รับสนองพระบรมราชโองการโปรดเกล้าฯ เป็นนายกฯ คนที่ 31สํานักข่าวไทย TNAMCOT
มุมมอง 321K
It’s not a border crossing. Without reason to believe she’s here unlawfully, his job is to release her
They don't show respect, there are dozens if not hundreds of video's of them being disrespectful, snarky and act like petty tyrants.
99 percent are tyrants and have extreme hatred for everyone else. They forget one day they will retire or die one day. They are more evil 😈 than the regular police because they have seen that they can abuse citizens and other people without any consequences. History has shown us that tyrants come and go and the curse is after retirement they will not live long enough to enjoy it or if they do they will be miserable in it. What you sow you reap at a vulnerable age.
Let's face it: these checkpoints are for intimidation. Just asking that one question doesn't prove anything at all about the person's citizenship.
This is where I think the SCOTUS got it wrong. A citizen has the right to travel without interference from law enforcement. I agree, just asking the question if you are a citizen and you answering yes does NOTHING to determine your citizenship status. The SCOTUS says that a brief stop to determine your status is permissible. When is violating a right ok even for a little amount of time? How long is ok? The whole thing is arbitrary. Rights are rights and should NEVER be violated.
You're all idiots and have no clue what is necessary to be an agent. Go back to your caves.
@@YohanPenny former law enforcement here and I can tell you from first hand experience that those checkpoints are bullcrap. All you have to do is look at their drivers license and run it thru ncic. It will automatically check 3 things and your citizenship is one of those. I totally agree with border enforcement but in reality it is a joke.
People just looking for any excuse to get money.
@@dennismood7476 a citizen has a right to travel on foot, driving isnt a right its a privilege.
Wow, a citizen wanting to stand up for their rights when so many people are just willing to bow down and give up their citizen rights.
The individuals who stand up are vilified by police, they make a scene and say things that get the people watching to think the person being questioned is in the wrong...
I have a video on my channel about an unjustified detainment. I have comments obviously that go both ways but at the end of the day people are finally aware that they have rights.
Just because you are talking to people in authority doesn't mean that you have to submit like a dog..
Learn what you can and can't do don't let people in a costume bully you.. they have guns and don't want you to have them..
record record record!
Stupid citizens don't even know what the bill of rights are and cannot even say them. Just go ask some.
You have a Right to remain Silent. And you also have a Right to Travel.
If it's in a car you have to have a valid drivers license, legally required to identify yourself if you are driving a vehicle... This has been upheld to trump ones right to remain silent.
Adam F: You're probably thinking of a police officer who has executed a traffic stop for an articulable reason. Also, a driver's license check is a different thing than a "citizenship for everyone in the car" check.
Azopi9 ao
Actually you do NOT need a license unless you are a commercial vehicle. The Supreme Court has rules that citizens had the right to travel when they used horse-drawn carriages, and they STILL retain that right with horseless carriages (cars). The right has not been lost
.
You may not need a license on FEDERAL PROPERTY as an ID , but every state has their own rules, and YES TO DRIVE IN THE STATE YOUR IN YOU NEED A LICENSE its not part of your FEDERAL RIGHT .. its a STATE LAW, and horseless carriages are not CARS.
What people failed to realize is that she has the right to stay quiet since everything you said can only be used against you in the court of law and the supreme court’s yes they rule the officer can ask the question if he has reasonable suspicion that she’s not a legal person in the United States and if she has committed or about to commit a crime
Yes, but where is it stated that the party must answer the question, he says he must ask it not that he has to have an answer.
You got that right they put this little green uniform on a badge and a gun and they think they have authority over everybody
She can plead the fifth in front of the judge, No one forced her to do otherwise, and she was given her rights to do so. There is a process to do it though, and you are just griping about it. There is a sane and good reason for the laws we have that protect our country and the citizens Unless you are here illegally or on the run for breaking laws, then there should be no reason to not show your ID when crossing state lines, or borders. Tired of people thinking they are so privileged they can be above the vetting process or verification processes. Time to grow up people.
@@lumindina699 so you don’t believe in the 4th amendment? You think everyone should give up their rights to protect America, but if they do that what America is left to protect? And additionally if someone said that about 2A, it would suddenly not apply, right?
@@chavvy9074 I never said I don't believe in the rights of our Amendments. We also have a process to follow when it comes to national security. PLEASE do not try to twist it up to look like no one should show ID. You sure have no issue flashing it to STRANGERS at the liquor store or bars when asked! OMFG please grow up and stop being the type that thinks everything is unfair because fairness is taught to you and there is really nothing "fair". That is something created in your own mind by your personal preferences and influences.. What is fair to you is not fair to others. Comprehend? Try using common sense especially when it comes to national security.
She comes across as being confrontational, but if that’s what it takes to reinforce our principles, I’m with it! Good job!
So the people stopping her for no legitimate reason and demanding she relinquish her Constitutional rights aren't confrontational? You are extremely confused.
@@alwayssunnyinphiladelphia922 you are in idiot Supreme Court already ruled it’s not a constitutional violation. Wannabe lawyers 😂🤣😂
@@Melinda_Ross why not
@@Melinda_Ross Why isn’t it the battle to pick? She stood firm on her rights and didn’t get arrested, and the recorded interaction sparked a conversation about the limits of police powers in a country that claims to police by consent. Why isn’t it a battle to pick again?
Why you support this? Its communism Not democracy.
In the end, she drove away after 90 min WITHOUT answering his questions... What does that tell you?
punishing non compliance with bootjack tactics,
That she wasted 90 mins of her and her child's life while the agent sat there and got paid. Whether she was on vacation or not, sitting in your car for 90 mins with 3 children isn't ideal. Lol
@@amendz07 she exercised her rights, some rights are worths a few minutes.
@@samjones6046 what exactly did she accomplish? I'm sure she did, at the same time the agents ran her plates, got her info and probably knew who she was in about 2 mins, I see where you're coming from, but at the end of the day... the agents still won. Haha
@@amendz07 not really, she hit their reputation and that agent's face has been plastered all across the news. His family and friends to whom this matters, they're not going to look at him the same way.
How about putting the border checkpoint at the border?
It tells you that there can be an internal checkpoint up to 100 miles. It tells you she was about 35 miles in to the US. She was well below the mile limit.
+Jason Gochez and also well in her rights to completely ignore anything they say to her. "unless I have committed a crime I refuse to speak to you anymore" bam
No you don't have to speak to them period and you have the right to request a lawyer if the want to ask questions.
Why didn't she just run the check point and keep on going?
john paul porrelli Na. Makes too much sense.
The problem is it's not a border checkpoint. People keep saying border checkpoint over and over again. That wasn't the border of Mexico and the United States that was 35 miles into the States. It's written right in the Constitution that we can travel from state to state. To enter into the United States yes you have to show your ID but to travel within the United States if you're not committing a crime then you shouldn't have to prove any ID.
please don't confuse the diehard statists with the truth and facts, it's more than they can handle
But didn't they say that the Supreme Court gives them the right to ask within 100 miles? I guess she also has the right to refuse to answer. The court didn't say she has to answer.
Yes, because jamming up this teacher for no real cause is truely keeping us safe.
they demoed the towers to make the people believe Kansas is on the border.
@L L if that is all she needed to do, does that mean that if everyone just says yes i am a citizen they will let them go? because that is just plain stupid.
border patrol should patrol the border where people are coming in to a country not some 35 miles in land, it is stupid to detain people who are driving to work or to the neighbour.
You have a right to remain silent. Period.
It’s good training too
The reporter who says at the end, “she was at a border checkpoint....”. No, she wasn’t. These checkpoints far from the actual border are a total discriminatory nuisance to locals who live in the area and need to use the roads, many of whom are Latino and whose families may have been living there for generations, even before it became U.S. territory in 1847.
Yes at the beginning of this they said she was not at a checkpoint they said she was within 100 miles of a checkpoint up but she was just riding down the street and that was her initial issue with this is that she wasn’t added checkpoint so I think what she’s saying is if she were at a checkpoint coming into the country she could understand that no at least that was my take away from this but the fact that she was riding down the street in a border town or city does not give them the right to just pull her over and ask about her status as a citizen or question her children the police are not even allowed to question your children THIS IS RIDICULOUS
We need more check points.
Rights not exercised are rights lost. She gave up 90 minutes of her time to make a point and start a conversation. Some people criticize and call names. They are sheep and will remain so. Others at least consider to what degree their rights are under attack and how much they want government to control their lives.
I want Free!!!! Rights not exercised are rights lost is exactly correct.
I am not a sheep. But, in America where our former president (worst ever) made police officers out to be criminals, I have no problem with helping officers, checkpoint police and the like do their job. If you've done nothing wrong, then oblige.
Those criticizing her are to be called "shepeople". Definition being those being led who submit to anything at the cost of their inalienable rights under the Constitution.
Unfortunately, you are definitely a shepoeple. Not understanding that we are the law, and that there should be no infringements of our inalienable rights.
We have been tricked into surrendering our rights for so-called safety...
Eyes always wide open, not shut. The test being that you can see your hands in front of you. After that slap yourself twice in face. Are you awake now?
I can't believe people are actually saying "just answer the question" or "you're being disrespectful." It proves one of the following to me: 1) People are truly sheep 2) So many are ignorant of their own rights 3) We have a lot of "yes-mans" in our country.
Interesting, Carol. I'm not sure you meant to call the border patrol agents insane, but all they had to do was answer "yes" when she asked if she was free to go. They chose instead to make a big mountain out of a molehill.
Thanks, Carol. I respect your right to choose how to answer, just like I respect hers. And if you don't see it, that's OK. Not everyone will.
+Carol - Is the legal standard in this country now presumed guilty until proven innocent? Do cops no longer need reasonable suspicion to stop you on the street and accuse you of committing a crime? Because that's exactly what the border patrol is doing. Without any evidence or reasonable suspicion that a person has done anything wrong, they're asking them to prove that they're innocent.
How would you feel if every time you left a store, you were stopped by a police officer and asked if you'd stolen anything? What if every time you went into the pharmacy, you were stopped and asked if you're a drug addict? How about just being stopped on the street and asked if you were planning to commit any crimes?
Would you consider such questioning acceptable? If not, why is stopping people at checkpoints and asking them if they're illegal aliens acceptable?
It used to be that unless you were doing something to make police suspicious, you were free to go about your business unmolested. Today, law enforcement views everyone as suspicious and feels they have the absolute right to stop anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason and treat them like a criminal until they're satisfied that the person isn't doing anything wrong...yet. That's called a police state and it's the kind of thing Americans used to look down on in countries like Russia and China.
why doesn't trump just meet with mueller and answer his questions
spoken like a true conformist. Comply or Die is your version of the American Slogan.
No one should be made to feel guilty or be coerced into giving up their guaranteed rights. Elitist don't understand this because they are given the benefit of doubt by law enforcement in almost every situation. Keep doing what you're told while we fight for your freedom.
You nailed it. They whine how ppl want to defund the police while they have their 'celebrity pardons' so they have no idea what the real citizens deal with. They can ask but Supreme court confirms we don't have to answer.
People need to understand that officers aren’t your friend and talking to them will put you into problems
I don't think she was wrong, I've been through lots of border check points in tx, I love how the idiots of the world always say that it's disrespectful to question their authority, those are the people that bow down and take anything, some of us stand up firm for our rights, it's disrespectful to the people that have died fighting for our rights.
LoL 🤣
The man was doing his job, as the United States government sees fit.
Is ironic how people always talk about protecting America, but then they are considered to be "bowing down" to authorities when asking for a simple question or to show an ID. What if an illegal immigrant (criminal or not) with an american accent simply refuse to answer a question or show an ID. It is impossible for an agent to tell if somebody is a citizen or a legal resident by just looking at their face.
I guess you would have to go through as many check points as I have to understand the point.
So this is what idiocracy looks like, huh? A citizen detained by agents for declining to do something that no law requires her to do. And a comment section full of morons talking about what this teacher should and shouldn't do, while not a one of them citing any law requiring her to do what they claim she should do. Brain parasite going around?
they are penalties in life. its not learning the law you need. it's learning how to avoid the penalties.
This citizen is doing a great job of helping people avoid the penalties of living in a "papers please" nation. If half the people who went through these checkpoints simply said, "Am I being detained?" and nothing else, then the shenanigans would stop and "internal" border patrol agents would have to do their jobs according to tried and true police procedures.
and a law enforcement agent wasting time and money just to penalize someone he clearly knew was a US Citizen just because he didn't like her attitude.
No, it's a matter of some self-righteous liberal lunatic causing a scene so as to feel self-empowered. She knows she could just say 'Yes, I'm a citizen' and promptly drive off, but would rather go through the process of them having to determine her citizenship. & if it was voted by the local jurisdiction to establish checkpoints close to the border, then it is well within the law. & I agree, you don't have to say anything, but if they have probable cause to detain you due to a dog being alerted to drug paraphernalia in the vehicle or some other unlawful activity, then it's a different story. & you may think it's 'useless' but I'm sure they're at least putting some dent in the 10,000,000 illegals breaking our laws.
So how can they tell she’s a citizen?
CBS missed the point that a person does not have to identify anything at these checkpoints. Yeah, yeah, the agents have authority to be there and ask questions, but no one has to answer. Period.
Yes they do, get a law degree, study criminal case law and see why what you just said makes you an idot.
Sigkim
This.
Wow! You sound real patriotic. Let me guess you're a Californian (land of the flakes and nuts) or a federal employee? Oh wait, I almost forgot to ask... are you going to law school? Where?
@Sigkim I don't have that much time on my hands. Opinions vary.
@Sigkim God Bless you or whatever you want to bless you. Peace!
What an authoritarian question from the woman newscaster! "How do we find out if you are a lawful citizen?" I know she is trying to help but her approach is wrong headed.
Can't, short of "show me your papers" type of paradigm, which is absolutely counter to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Exactly and I love how she said "apparently questioning authority is being disrespectful" lol no acting like a karen is what was disrespectful. I'm sure she feels like a true hero for this 🤣🤣🤣🤣
*GESTAPO CHECKPOINT SHOW YOUR PAPERS*
She wasn't stopped by the constitution.
San Diego, where I was born on the navy base, is within that 100 miles (actually, the hospital is less that 20 miles from the border). By the Supreme Court ruling, all persons in the city and a large portion of the county of SD, can be detained outside their homes or residences, schools and places of worship on the grounds of “reasonable” suspicion of illegal border crossing. That’s f’ing scary.
In reality, about 2/3 of the population lives within this 100 mile border range. It is pretty scary.
What's scary is 90% of the country lives within a 100 miles of a border...
Hey I lived in Huntington Beach for 25 years I used to go down to Mexico all the time before 911 you did not need a passport and the border patrols would just ask you where you're born where you're from where you going you just answer me when you're on your way it's not a big deal why she have to be such a Karen let them do their job and be on your way stop answer the questions and be on their way it's just like with traffic cops pull you over of course there's bad seeds Okay but most of time you cooperate you do what you're told you're on your way you have a ticket or you're on your way with a warning you don't get shot you don't get killed do as you're told when they're in those kind of situations with authority you want your privacy give them what they want and get on your own stop stirring the pot for no reason
@@DJ72266 it’s when people pretend that pisses me off. You’re talking about the Tijuana border checkpoint which is when we should have to answer these questions. She’s 35 miles from the nearest border… there’s a significant difference.
thats america for you the land of stupid laws and rules and at the same time you have 20 amendments that normally say that what these people are doing is wrong go figure
Ask the question at tne real border then
In America we have the Right to remain silent, and not answer anything
.
electrictroy2010 correct. And there’s consequences
electrictroy2010 she just needs to answer the question very simple
antonio201241 no she doesn’t need to answer that’s the whole point of this video. Lol
It makes you more stupid to not answer questions
@@antonio201241 Correct. Finally someone who gets it.
I agree he has to do his job, and his job is the oath he swore to the constitution and the freedoms given to the people.
The Constitution and its Amendments are "vague" and it requires the SCOTUS to interpret......And the SCOTUS has ruled that what those agents are doing is well within the "Constitution and its freedoms".
@@machonsote918 THEY ARE .N.O.T. "VAGUE", AND THEY MEAN PRECISELY WHAT THEY SAY.
@@harrisjames2047 : Wow! You're knowledgeable of Constitutional Law............Even, without a High School Diploma.
How is simply ASKING "Are you a U.S. citizen?" and then letting them go if they answer yes accomplishing _anything?_ Do they think illegals aren't going to or can't lie?
*BPA:* "Are you a U.S. citizen?"
*Illegal Immigrant:* "Yes"
*BPA:* "On your way."
What did _that_ just accomplish? The same thing war is good for, according to the old song (absolutely nothing).
This is why there should be no checkpoints. It's a joke.
If the answer is yes but you don’t have your documents to prove it then you in deep trouble and now you have to spend hella time and money
@@kimjuanjun7124 Problem is you only have to answer "yes", you don't _need_ documentation.
@@WmTRiker
Once again smooth head. BP ain't your friend. Hell any government nor state agency ain't your friend. They will find fraud and offense when there isn't.
There's a reason why there's
thousands if not millions behind bars as we speak over crimes they never commit.
This is why voting cards and citizenship cards should be a thing. These illegals need to be stopped
Apparently she was in her rights lol...she was let go
Emily the patrol officer could’ve let her go immediately either way. They only detain you cause that’s all they can do. She still didn’t answer the question. They can’t arrest you for not answering. You pretty much just get detained for pissing them off.
Emily that’s what I just said. All they can do is detain you. You’re not gonna get arrested. They detain you. And they let you go.
@@poca723 After they get your plate and verify your citizenship.
ZThye ran her plate and found that she was a citizen. Why she couldn't tell them that? Idk. Probably her friend brainwashed her.
MegaGames360 oh good so then you DONT need to answer and they don’t need to ask. They can check with my plates and spare us the time
she wasn't on the border end of story she was right not to answer
jack dawson no she was not there is an exception so to speak at the border. The US. Government has this right to question up to a certain distance from the border. If u remember correctly 100 to 150 miles in from the border. they were 30 miles.
Government has the right to question. She has the right not to answer.
It depends on which rights you mean, Momusism. Please be more specific.
They don't have the right to demand you answer a question. What they do have is a right to lie, use deception tactics and hold you briefly for an immigration status check. Naturally the word briefly is ill defined and most people would rather answer a stupid question than spend time while border patrol dicks around. As you approach the permanent checkpoint license plate readers are getting the info that will give them a reason for further investigation. Anyone who believes cops don't engage false arrest on DUI should do a youtube search.
intimidation. They want to make you feel like a criminal and you are in peril simply for exercising your rights.
The question shouldn't been Are you an American citizen? America is the whole continent, not just the USA.
Question . How many illegals stop at a so called check point speak perfect English ?
"Just doing his job." You know if I hire someone to throw eggs at cars as they come down the road does that make it ok because "he was just doing his job?" Man I hate that phrase.
ANSWER IS NO.
TheGrayman1234, that might have been the worst analogy I’ve ever heard. That doesn’t relate to this at all
@D Yes, but he wasn't harassing anyone, so your analogy was equally stupid.
It didn't work at Nuremberg either.
We see that CBS has no respect for our constitution. Parmely is a hero for standing up to this. The agent arrogantly displays his supreme court card which in fact gives them permission to ask but does NOT require a citizen to answer. Submission to these "little" questions begins to erode our rights as raindrops can also slowly wash mountains to the sea. STAND UP FOR THE CONSTITUTION. Did the officer identify? I did not catch that. Ninety minutes is unreasonable. Title 18, sec 241 should be used against that officer and his hubris. Supreme court ruling, like may laws and regulations are often twisted and abused by authority hungry tyrants.
Paul Geyer I totally agree
Paul Geyer Corporate media are essentially boot licking sycophants with regards to authority. BP is free to ask questions a driver (see US vs Martinez-Fuentes 428 US 543 (1978)) is free to refuse to answer per SCOTUS and failure to comply is not Reasonable Suspicion to continue or extend a detention.
Paul you said It right
Paul Geyer go watch Fox News if u don’t like it
It was 30 miles away from the border so how is this a border checkpoint? As a U.S. citizen you have the right not to answer questions. Not answering questions cannot be used as reasonable suspicion or probable cause that a crime has been or is being committed so anything more than a brief detainment for asking a few questions (which you don't have to answer) is a violation of her rights.
No you're not allowed to illegally detained someone unless you can articulate a crime or a traffic violation if you illegally detained someone you can be sued
The concept itself to ask someone 30 miles away from the border if he/she is a US citizen is preposterous. The border patrol agents could ask the same question to somebody next to the statue of Liberty in New York city or in some park downtown. The catch here is in the fact that whether the person in question has crossed the border or not. Since immigration service did not see her crossing or not crossing the border, she should be treated just like any other human being who is moving about and around.
I completely agree. I always had to pass by an immigration checkpoint on my way to work. Always had to plan for 20 additional minutes because they would slow all the traffic down and felt it was ridiculous to be questioned on a public road without a cause.
it’s a job that has to be done, if they aren’t citizens they just show their Visa and expiration date.
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte does not mean you have to give up your 5th Amendment rights under the Constitution. Furthermore, it says the Border Patrol does not have unlimited time to detain you.
Personally, I think this ruling should be challenged and struck down. It is a clear violation of the 4th Amendment.
This teacher spent some time and adrenaline, but her relationship with her students and community will be sooo much better. Well worth it. And this agent just showed how stupid and senseless current regulations are. Maybe that is the way he is required to do his job, but I feel sorry for him. And for all of us.
The tyrants rely upon us thinking we're not cooperating with their actions..
The same actions in reverse shows who your master is and they don't like it when we ask the questions... 👍
It's amazing how quickly they will escalate if you "don't cooperate."
@@zoneonemusic what border...the border is open. enjoy your new president
@@waynewatts4011 what are you talking about? I'm sorry, I don't understand MAGAteese.
The people own the gov. The gov. owns the citizens. Which one are you?
Another avenue that the boarder patrol agents could use is basic logic or commen sense. I'm guessing that someone that is not a citizen is not going to attempt to stand up to this tyranny and exercise her right to travel freely.
standing up does not make you any more of a citizen, it just makes you clever. wait out the time and they have to let you go. so if I am an Illegal all i gotta do is keep my mouth shut, time runs out and I'm on my way. simple as that.
Do worry the have you name and who your are in their computers and pictures they took of you at DMV.
''tyranny'' lmao. Are stop signs, speed limits, & parking meters tyrannical as well? If the citizen represented by elected officials voted for there to be a checkpoint so as to curb the flow of illegals especially due to its proximity from the border, then there is no problem.
Jonas, so let's vote back slavery in the southern states. No problem. smh. Bottom line is that any law "elected officials voted for..." cannot run afoul of the US Constitution. It's what I pledged an oath to when I enlisted in the Army and that is what I'll defend.
The point not addressed here is that this teacher was driving in the United States and never left the highway entering another country.
......and stated this was a border patrol 30 miles north of the border .
We The People Don’t Have to give up our Rights for Anyone. ( Officers need Reasonable Suspicion, Then Citizens still Do Not Have to answer Questions ) A Constitutional Protected Right Can Not be Made a Crime.
These CBS folks seem to be saying, "just give up your rights and do what they demand."
It’s really pointless. “Are you a US citizen”? “Yeah, sure”. It’s about as effective as stopping people to ask them what their favorite color is.
She was NOT at a border checkpoint.
The job does NOT need to be done.
Detaining someone until they assist in their own prosecution is wrong, and this cops job is just as wrong.
Why does it raise questions, it was established over 200 years ago and affirmed by SCOTUS, SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO ANSWER.
I have to give up my rights so someone else can do their job?
How is answering a simple question giving up your rights?!
@@brianpomeroy9624 Imagine being a hispanic- American living in the border, and ANYTIME you traveled you are asked "are you a US citizen ?" Do I really have to prove that i am an American based off my looks ? If this is called being an American, I want none of it.
@@slkjess1206 Excuse me, how hard is this:
Officer: Good afternoon, ma'am, are you U.S. Citizen?
You:. Yes sir.
Officer: Okay, you can go.
Seriously?!!! The Border Patrol Officers have a job to do. Do you think they want to stand there and argue with you because you can't be reasonable and just answer a simple question? For crying out loud! Just answer a simple question and be reasonable. It's not that complicated. SMDH.
@@brianpomeroy9624 It is their job, but do i need to prove i am an American citizen ? Imagine their being a checkpoint where you live, and you were constantly asked/questioned if your a US citizen along with other questions of confirmation such as "where were you born ? What hospital were you born at ? Where did you go to school ? etc. Also, this is a problem with the law, not the border patrol agents. Border patrol should be limited in their power, and only ask such questionns if they are suspicious, and thats it. Let people go on their merry way. I was born in the U.S.A., so i am an American right ?
@@slkjess1206 If you're in a border area, you don't know who's a citizen or who isn't. If you just answer the question, you'll get it over with much faster than arguing.
The reporter said it was a border checkpoint but it wasn’t. They’re not even reporting on this accurately. The teacher’s point was they were NOT at a border crossing. They’re in the USA so she’s like why do I need to tell you my citizenship. Reporters were all clearly biased. Terrible trait in a reporter.
Good on her for not submitting... Rise above the sheeple!
“I’m a teacher, I’m on vacation...I have time” Haha
The people critisizing this woman saying "this job must be done" are ignoring the fact of law that a "reasonable" suspicion that a crime has been comitted or that the person in question is in the United States illegally.
The people's rights to stay silent does not disappear in the absense of reasonable suspicion, and perceived disrespect, justified or unjustified, does not meet the requirement of "reasonable" suspicion.
What is suspect are the right-wingers support of gestapo tactics that violate Constitutional rights.
@Ed Judd The Supreme Court has also ruled that using your 5th amendment right to remain silent is not grounds for reasonable suspicion. Obviously, driving on a highway is not reasonable suspicion. Where was the reasonable suspicion coming from?
Border Patrol is a pathetic excuse of an organization.
Yea right, until you experience it for yourself you shouldn’t speak on it… there are plenty of bad cops like good ones, why do so many cops hate cameras BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS TOLD AND SHOWS HOW UNPROFESSIONAL AND DISRESPECTFUL THEY CAN BE!
u have to remember that as soon as u mention your right to any one in law enforcement it becomes confrontational, or your being difficult, and that's sad
That's right... a true patriot doesn't give out personal information to strangers.
Anybody that has civil rights, and just gives them up, without question, does not deserve to have rights in the first place.
Thank you, Oh Lord of the Apes!
After 5 minutes, I'd answer NO. And then ask if I can leave since I answered their question lol.
I'm pretty sure that would catch a charge of lying to a government official. That's why the best thing to do is remain silent. ALWAYS remain silent.
If you answered no, they would want your address so they could send you the $1700 debit card.
How is violating my rights "being respectful?"
“With respect and dignity”. Quite the lie.
A agree with her. I’m not answering a dam question.
Your stupid
Its spelled damn.
A dam holds back water.
You're an idiot.
You’re stupid
“I’m a teacher, I’m on vacation, I got time!” Yassss sis 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
You always have the Right to Remain silent. YOU ALSO HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. SCOTUS can not supersede the Constitution.
Am I detained? If Yes what crime have I committed? If Yes, I will exercise my rights to remain silent. Not answering any questions!
"Just doing their job" I've heard that somewhere before...
A lifeguard fighting you to pull you out of the water as you panic?
A doctor trying to calm down a child who doesn't want to receive a shot?
A worker inconveniently blocking multiple lanes of the road to repair the road?
A firefighter grabbing you by the hair to pull you out of a burning car?
A law enforcement officer trying to get information so they can conclude their investigation?
I suppose there are many instances you could've heard someone say they were just doing their job.
I hear that to. WW2. What year is it.?. Going into 1940 or 2020
*WWII GESTAPO*
@@juliusevolvere6835 what video were you watching? I didn't see any of those things in this video? but many sitting the department of homeland security chair at Nuremburg said that for working at the department of homeland security in germany.
That is the same thing the SS said when apprehending and executing Jews...
Hoda, Here is the question, "Are we able to travel throughout the United States freely and unobstructed if we have done nothing wrong?"
She felt offended cause she’s white. In other words “do I look like a citizen? Im white, duh!”
I stopped at the Border Patrol check point on Hwy 86 going up towards Salton City by Salton Sea. The officer asked me if I was a citizen, I said yes, the officer asked to check my ID, I showed him my DL. He glanced at it and then ask if I was carrying any fruits, I said no I was going fishing at Salton Sea. He handed me back my DL and I was good to go. No more than 1 minute of my time.
1badEK thank you if people would just do that then everyone would get along fine
1badEK and you freely just said to that government official that you don't care about your bill of rights and you will just comply
So you're saying that drug smuggler can go past any check point as long as they dress properly, don't identify themselves, and just don't comply? So can we walk into a courthouse, then just walk around the metal detectors and guards, because we feel it just wastes our time?
Pumpertube. Nothing wrong with being courteous to others. But you probably wasn't taught that.
1badEK are you saying it's rude to assert ones rights? you can be courteous and still stand up for your rights.
The easiest way for her to overcome that situation is by saying I will answer if my lawyer is present I have seen some videos where passengers respond that way and they are told to continue
She's an informed citizen. Exercising rights. It is legal incounter. It not a citizen job to help others do their job incorrectly. Or to come up with solutions.
check points should at the border, not 30 miles inside the f--king border. Don't answer any questions and if they detain you, just sit there and file the lawsuit afterwards for violating your rights. This is straight up un-constitutional. Not wanting to answering questions is NOT being disrespectful, it's your LEGAL right not to answer their questions.
I asked a foreign national guard at DHS/ice/BP office San Diego if he's a US citizen and he refused to answer.
She would have had to have done something that they could reasonably have just cause to detain her. Since they do not have this, she should not have been detained.
CBP Are not that SMART it's an EGO thing going ON with CBP!! A lot of them are GANG Members
It is only LEGAL for the Government to detain you to determine if you are a citizen when you are crossing the border or are suspected of a crime. SCOTUS making a RULE is NOT Constitutional! But they have more power than You, so write your Congressman.
"Papers Please", wake up America and stand up for your constitutional rights!
GOOD FOR HER! BRAVO!
Agent: are you a U.S. citizen?
Me: claro que por supuesto que desde luego que sí señor. * there, I answered and was super polite.
Great idea, I'm biliingual, I think I will answer only in spanish. That will be fun.
I despise having checkpoints inside our borders.
The courts say the border patrol allows them to REQUEST citizenship status. It is a REQUEST and does not require an answer.
The agents don't stop with one question if you are Hispanic. Once you answer, they want more.
Lies. I’ve been through these checkpoints a lot as I live in a border town. All you say is yes sir and you go. Never had a problem. Sometimes they just wave everyone through.
If the Supreme Court indeed has okayed this tactic, then we have a very bad constitutional crisis within the Supreme Court. Anyone who is ok with this sort of impingement on our civil liberties has no idea or respect for liberty and freedom in this country. This is not protection, it is a step toward tyranny and oppression. The right to proceed within the U.S. without interference unless there is probable cause which can be demonstrated is a fundamental right and any breach of that right should worry everyone. I am aghast that the Supreme Court would breach such a right.
oh because its just so hard for someone who is an American citizen to answer yes when asked. I wonder what liberty they are getting in the way of for a 2 sec question and answer?
RhondaH we lost our rights after 911
RhondaH she thinks that the world is same kind of utopia but she will change her mind the day she gets raped and murderd by a illegal alien
It's not hard to answer, at all, and if someone chooses to do so, that's cool. If they choose not to, that's cool, too. It's a free country.
+tobias sol bet that never happens lmao ignorant fool
SHE DOESNT HAVE TO COMPLY SHE IS IN THE US!! SHE DOESNT HAVENT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THIS US AMERICA!!!
These hosts are clueless. Refusing to answer does not give reasonable suspicion which means any other investigation was unreasonable detention.
Holding you hostage is respect?
Emily The law was created to protect the people not to harass and enslave them.
Just remember that before and during the revolutionary war. Everyone was required to go through unlawful check points and prove who they were. We caught that war for many violations of our rights, this being one of them. Ameri an citizens should never have to go through this. We are the ones being disrespected and this lady was right. Good for you.
I was stopped in a military vehicle in uniform it took me less than 2 minutes to answer questions and go about my way. This woman and so called teacher is an activist trying to get week minded people to be upset.
What a mess. Customs are really unprofessional.
I went through this same checkpoint in 2005 under the influence of LSD.
Badass bro.
NEWS FLASH for CBS news !!! There is NO "legal question" here. At least not to anyone who UNDERSTANDS what is going on. There is NO legal requirement to answer ANY of their questions. Don't take MY word for it, CALL the HEAD of Border Patrol. Ask this simple "yes" or "no" question.
"Is there ANY law which REQUIRES a person to answer the question " are you an American citizen?"
Hint: the correct answer is "no."
@@emily4439 all she had to do is start charging them10,000.00 per minute she was detain ! Because they had no legal reason to hold her !
@@emily4439 and that is technically illegal detention at that point.
@@emily4439 You really don't have a clue of what you are talking about ! You just go on with your boot licking nonsense !
@@emily4439 Legal reason to stop a person for a violation is completely ok. But detaining someone without any reason is illegal. You can stop people for suspicion... you can't stop everyone. and no... Have yet to see anyone of these people get arrested or anything for not showing ID.
All they can ask is citizenship
There’s no respect required for the official
Nope, you have the 4th amendment right not to answer questions. I'm a republican.
No law requires people to answer the questions from the *GESTAPO*
2:13 It's hilarious how someone wants to criticize yet can't spell "border" correctly while doing so.
It's hilarious how snobs think that people that can't spell or rely on spell check are stupid when the people who are stupid are the snobs.
They have no right to act like the Gestapo!! These practices have to be outlawed!!!
Some of the practices already are not legal. We need to get these law-breaking Border Patrol agents convicted.
I stand with her it is our 4th amendment right and if we don't use them we will lose them.
I would refuse, too. Gestapo on the loose!
Exercise your rights 💪
Don't evee be scared to ever stand up for your rights
+jabberwolf it gives him the authority to ask her if she's a citizen, it does not give him the authority to do anything other than temporarily detain her for refusing to answer.
how did we get to the point where such a large part of society thinks questioning and challenging authority is Un-American......when it is the bedrock of Americanism/Patriotism.
roadside check points like this should be found unconstitutional.
So if a citizen of Mexico drives up to a checkpoint and refuses to answer if they are a US citizen what are they Border Control officer suppose to do?
This woman should have been arrested on the spot taken to jail. Then be charged and let the court set a trial date and Bail. She could have been legally charged with refusing to comply with the Lawful Order of a Police Officer. At that point let the court decide what to do with her. That would have been the right thing to do for this Border Patrol Officer.
She did not violate a law here. She complied with every lawful order given to her.
The last time the Border Patrol took a person who declined to answer to court, they lost.
So Heroic!!! She is a Beacon of Hope for all of us!! Stick it to the man!!
I dare her to try that at a Mexican check point.
she doesn't have American rights there dipshit lmao
Johnny Cash , no kidding.
Thing is, we’re not in Mexico, we’re in the land of the free
Who would want you? 🤮
Exerting your rights is never wrong. Just Remember one thing when dealing with LE. Anything you say can be used against you.
That’s why you say I wish to remain silent and if I’m free to go. If you’re detain then hold till a lawyer is on phone
Legally you Don't have to Answer but if you Do Not want to Deal with the US border patrol Do Not be in their jurisdiction
What the media idiots don't grasp is its not at the BORDER. In this instance it is apparently 35 miles north of the Border. Crossing the border, I 100% support our border patrol. If I was stopped at one of these unconstitutional check points I would compley either.
This teacher was right for standing up for her rights.