So true. GenX'ers who started driving in the 90's only had some pretty slow 80's/early 90's cars to choose from...that's why we became the fast and furious generation and gave rise to tons of aftermarket performance companies. Millennials (especially later ones) don't realize they grew up in the performance renaissance days where automakers finally figured out how to meet strict emissions requirements without strangling engine performance.
It’s also extremely unsafe in a world full of Tahoes and F-250s. I’m sorry but that’s just the reality. You take a risk driving a car like this around all these distracted idiots
@@TomK-ti8kpExactly, but some of these nonintellectual luddites, don't tell em otherwise. The victim of a crash in a red mid-90s Mustang coupe, being fatally t-boned recently by a white previous generation Grand Cherokee perfectly highlights your point. Being in a low V8 M3 coupe, was scary one night when some "Bad Bunny maniac" in a Jeep Compass nearly killed me while running a red-light that had been Left arrow green on my side for 8 seconds. The Bimmer had top notch safety, but this or that Mustang? Not even close.
Mom mom bought a new one in 95. We loved it and it was a great car. We called it a guinea pig because of the way it was shaped, but it drove great and was nice to drive. Good little family car.
Owned 6 or 7 of these B14 Sentra & 200SXs, including 4 that had the venerable SR20DE. I loved every single one of them. Today, my love affair with Nissan continues: C11 Versas, Z12 cubes, etc., etc. Long Live Nissan!!! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
My first car as a 17 y/o. in 1996, and a 5spd manual. It was a brand new lease vehicle my dad got for me as a Nissan employee. It was great to get a new car every single year until I had to buy my own.
What happened? As a kid in the 80s and 90s, I remembered Nissan to be the more premium Japanese brand compared to Honda and Toyota. Now they’re just cheap crappy cars.
When the '95 Sentra came out I remember thinking it looked so boxy. Bubble-shaped cars were all the rage at the time. Think of the Neon. The design grew on me pretty quickly though. I actually really like it now.
@@NestorMauricioDelgado Nissan ran into some financial trouble because they were not selling well in asian market . Here in north america we saw Maxima , Altima's , and sentra's everywhere , not to mention back in early 2000's Nissan Altima outsold both Camry and Accord for 1 year , but it kept position 3 for itself for a very long time. GM , Ford and Chrysler never had a family car good enough to compete against products from Japanese manufacturers.
We had a 91 Sentra with passive seatbelts. My grandparents loved it enough, that by the time the 96s came out, they got one of these in the video for themselves. Although they picked this ridiculous burgundy/maroon color which I always hated. They kept it until I grew up and was able to drive, and I sometimes take it for a ride cause it was actually a super great car. The ride was smooth, the car was actually fairly quick imo and I liked that it was low to the ground. It lasted until 2011 when the radiator randomly cracked but coincidentally in the same month my grandparents wanted to change the car out anyway, so it more than served the purpose.
I remember wanting one of these cars back in the day. It was a solid car from memory. Worked for the dealership where this car was probably picked up from also. Couldn’t afford one at the time. But always fun to drive one.
4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1
I'd take these 80s and 90s vehicles back, any day!! Simplicity and reliability. Plus, so many had a stick shift.
Of a certain time, this was the 2nd car you ever owned, 5 years used, and commuting to your local state college for a degree in Computer Science, minor in Business.
Loved economy cars like this back then. U saw Civics, Corollas, and Escorts all over the place back then!!!! U could buy a car for 36-48mos back then 😊
For 30+ years the Sentra has been a peppy little car with a great price. I once had a 2005 1.8S and loved how peppy it was along with the amazing handling and steering feel. The interior was perfect for the price as it had the right amount of features for a compact car that's a combination of sporty, practical, and an every day driver. The only downside was the limited power output above 3,000 rpm, making it clumsy with passing at higher speeds and accelerating onto highways.
Ahh, back when Nissan was still one of the premier Japanese auto companies😢 Tbh they still made some great engines on into the 2k's, but far too often paired with a garbage cvt transmission that made the entire thing pointless. I still hold out hope Nissan can recover from past leadership mistakes and more importantly break free from their French (not exactly known for the highest build quality) overlords. Toyota has partnerships with both Subaru and Mazda, why not Nissan as well?
For some reason, the design of this generation Sentra took a step backwards from the 1991-1994 models. The rear of this 1995 edition just looked odd to me. I never took to it. They were popular, however, and I still see them on the road from time to time, some in good condition.
This B14 Nissan had already been designed in late 1991, when the Japanese economy crashed and they went cheap. The previous one, was a design from 1987 during great economic times. Nissan went very conservative for the mid 90s after financial woes post 1991 and tried to be exciting again for the Y2K era, but Renault forced cuts on them reducing quality on most released for 2002+. Next generation Sentra and Xterra were the last pre-Renault controlled designs. After that, Renault influenced Nissans from pre-production changes to wholesale development work (from scratch) depending on closeness to release.
Probably the most dangerous in that context too. Bulging out, ready to smack someone in the face. 90s airbags on that side of the car, were a bomb waiting to meet its mark. Very literal in the Altima of this era, so bad Nissan had to revise it abruptly before anyone noticed how bad it was designed. Ended up being sued over it, for blinding people.
@@th83 Lol, so the marketing department covering for accounting department decisions. I will say a torsion beam done right can be very good, my current car (2021 Mazda 3 turbo hatch) has torsion beam and it rarely calls attention to itself. An ex girlfriend had a 2012 Chevy Equinox that I drove occasionally and the torsion beam was very apparent even in some lower speed bumpy corners. Of course a small crossover isn't designed for handling, but there is a distinct difference in the way Mazda has theirs setup for the platform under the 3, CX-30 and CX-50.
@@jbm0866 LOL, pretty much! To be fair, Nissan actually did a pretty good job with theirs back in the day. They used it in the Maxima for nearly a decade, and even the Infiniti I30/I35 entry-level luxury sedans had it until the I35 was discontinued after the 2004 model year. The general consensus was that it actually felt "normal" most of the time, with only mid-corner bumps causing the rear-end to sidestep a bit giving away that it wasn't an IRS. I haven't driven any of the new Mazda cars with the torsion beam but I imagine Mazda knows what they're doing. I doubt any normal person could tell the difference haha
@@th83 I've see car reviewers admit they didn't know the latest Mazda 3 has a torsion beam until they looked at the spec sheet after driving for a while. It is noticeable over speed bumps and some extremely bumpy tight corners, but most of the time it feels just like multi-link independent I've had in other cars
Preferred the two previous generations of the Sentra. They didn't build another attractive Sentra until the most recent full redesign in the late 2010s.
Compare the price to a brand new Sentra. Then compare the price of a new Sentra to a new Civic or Corolla. The new Versa replaces this car effectively. Nissan still makes affordable small cars for those who want them.
If the Versa only had a 6 speed automatic, it would be much better and desirable for a lot of people. They could even put the manual in the SR trim and that would help a lot too. People would buy manuals if you could get them in cars with features.
I would like a base model with a 6-speed manual but they only offer it with the 5-speed manual. I was also looking at a base model Impreza but Subaru has deleted the manual for even the base model. It's depressing. I hate automatics.
It's true. Over the decades models have been getting larger. The Versa is more comparable in size and amenities to the '90s Sentra. The current Sentra is comparable to the '90s Altima.
This is quite spacious for a "subcompact" car from the 90's. I wonder why MotorWeek would call a Corolla competitor a "subcompact", especially when smaller cars tha this like the Mitsubishi Mirage and Toyota Tercel existed and were on sale in the US at the time.
Because that's the classification that it fits in. It's not arbitrary or subjective, there's actual government regulations regarding what category the car is in. I don't know what formula they use to determine this, but there are different standards for like fuel economy and safety for different classes.
The definition of full size, midsize, compact and subcompact have changed over time. And carmakers themselves have been blurring the lines. Example: the current Civic is not only larger than the first few generations of Accord, it's also roughly the same size as the late 90's/early 2k's Accord.
As @blisterbrain said, it's a matter of government regulation and based purely on interior cubic volume.... it was somewhere around 95-100 cubic feet that separated subcompact from compact, and I remember even back in the day being confused how a Corolla or Sentra or Escort were all clearly competitors and yet were in different classifications.
I never liked this Sentra because it followed an excellent generation. In its top trim, it was respectable. Anything less seemed like poverty, third-world transportation.
What a sensible vehicle. Something lacking in the market today. Everything today seems to only cater to spoiled brats who always need to "have it all."
I had one. It was a lemon. A leak around the windshield, shorted wiring harness, turn signals that only worked if you turned off the radio, windshield washers that broke, immobilizer that turned the car off while driving down the highway, broken hood release, rust rust rust, etc. went to the junk yard with less than 80k miles
Please Please Please JD….retire!!! Your bellowing and exaggerated speaking is SO annoying!!! You did so much for the automotive press but your dated style just turns off anyone under 30…..yes I’m being harsh but I’m also speaking truth. If you cannot let go of the reigns Motorweek will be defunct in a handful of years! What does Motorweek share with the most successful automotive social media channels? NOTHING!!!
8.8 seconds 0-60 was wild for a 1.6 back in ‘95
So true. GenX'ers who started driving in the 90's only had some pretty slow 80's/early 90's cars to choose from...that's why we became the fast and furious generation and gave rise to tons of aftermarket performance companies.
Millennials (especially later ones) don't realize they grew up in the performance renaissance days where automakers finally figured out how to meet strict emissions requirements without strangling engine performance.
Even today in the UK, that's a decently quick acceleration for a modern family car
It's the wheels. Look how small they are. 13"-14" don't take much torque to spool em up lol.
@@user-sk1eh3pg6jfacts. I remember upgrading the stock 13s on my civic to big boy 15s and the car got even slower
Previous gen 1.6 was even quicker!
Simplicity, reliability, serviceability, and durability. I would take it now.
It’s also extremely unsafe in a world full of Tahoes and F-250s. I’m sorry but that’s just the reality. You take a risk driving a car like this around all these distracted idiots
@@TomK-ti8kpExactly, but some of these nonintellectual luddites, don't tell em otherwise.
The victim of a crash in a red mid-90s Mustang coupe, being fatally t-boned recently by a white previous generation Grand Cherokee perfectly highlights your point.
Being in a low V8 M3 coupe, was scary one night when some "Bad Bunny maniac" in a Jeep Compass nearly killed me while running a red-light that had been Left arrow green on my side for 8 seconds.
The Bimmer had top notch safety, but this or that Mustang? Not even close.
Me too. I miss those days.
I had a 1995 200SX which was essentially the two door version of the Sentra and it had a 5 speed manual. It was a great car and looked great in green!
A coworker had that same exact car/color. Went over 200k miles. Fantastic car
My aunt had a yellow one, I miss it.
Mom mom bought a new one in 95. We loved it and it was a great car. We called it a guinea pig because of the way it was shaped, but it drove great and was nice to drive. Good little family car.
Just saw one on the road yesterday up here in Jersey.
These were everywhere in the late 90s early 2000s.
Seemed like almost everyone had this car in the early 2000s
Yup EVERYWHERE. When I wasn't a car snob, I loved these for not being boxy. I universally hated boxy cars in the 90s overall, in being a kid.
I agree Very True I remember that sentra in the early 2000s it was everywhere and they were very reliable. The old Nissan cars were built to last
1:37 John: THOUGH OUR GXE'S GRADE TEST CAR'S LACK OF A TACHOMETER IS AN UNFORTUNATE OMISSION! LOL
At least it kept him from talking about the voltmeter!
OIL PRESSURE GAUGE?
It is
Owned 6 or 7 of these B14 Sentra & 200SXs, including 4 that had the venerable SR20DE. I loved every single one of them. Today, my love affair with Nissan continues: C11 Versas, Z12 cubes, etc., etc. Long Live Nissan!!! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
For me, this generation of Sentra is the definition of "car". Miss my parents' one.
Definitely one of the most regular cars to ever car. Of all the cars to ever exist, this is certainly one of them.
Nissan is always a “car” it seems.
There's also Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla embracing the definition of a "car" in that generation as well. This alongside Nissan Sentra.
Sentras have always been a great value.
Until the put the cvt in it.
No need a tachometer. Just up shift when you feel the fuel cut.
My first car as a 17 y/o. in 1996, and a 5spd manual. It was a brand new lease vehicle my dad got for me as a Nissan employee. It was great to get a new car every single year until I had to buy my own.
I miss this era of Nissan.😓
Back when Nissan didn't produce automotive garbage exclusively for sociopaths.
What happened? As a kid in the 80s and 90s, I remembered Nissan to be the more premium Japanese brand compared to Honda and Toyota. Now they’re just cheap crappy cars.
B I G A L T I M A E N E R G Y
Even into the mid 00s they were producing some great vehicles - the Altima, maxima, revived Z car, 1st and 2nd gen G35, 1st gen M35, etc.
@@Wasabi9111sold off to French manufacturer Renualt just like Mitsubishi.
@JimmyDoresHairDye
Always the ones going 110 thru a schoolzone, on the shoulder, with two temp donut spares.
Nissan just LOVED not giving people a tac to their cheapest car offerings. They were still pulling that stunt in the Versa over 10 years after this.
My 2012 Versa SV had a tack. Oddly, it didn't have a folding rear seat, which annoyed me.
I still see these on the road today!!
She fairly hammered through that slalom 😮
Brakes fighting for dear life
They suffered in the cold like John said
One of the few times that I was worried about the driver
The previous generation was much better looking, especially the SE-R. I was so disappointed when this came out
When the '95 Sentra came out I remember thinking it looked so boxy. Bubble-shaped cars were all the rage at the time. Think of the Neon. The design grew on me pretty quickly though. I actually really like it now.
The time when Nissan was head to head with Toyota and Honda . Renault just ruined this japanese affordable and reliable brand
If nissan was in a good shape, why she was in bankrupcty? Nissan is a good brand also now. Better than GM with his poor products
@@NestorMauricioDelgado Nissan ran into some financial trouble because they were not selling well in asian market . Here in north america we saw Maxima , Altima's , and sentra's everywhere , not to mention back in early 2000's Nissan Altima outsold both Camry and Accord for 1 year , but it kept position 3 for itself for a very long time. GM , Ford and Chrysler never had a family car good enough to compete against products from Japanese manufacturers.
My sister had a 1996, she used it got college from 2007-2012, I remember it being relatively reliable too
brother had one in college. never let him down just kept going and going
1995 Nissan Sentra GXE from Manila 2001 in the Philippines!
You mean Nissan Sunny B14, not Sentra
We had a 91 Sentra with passive seatbelts. My grandparents loved it enough, that by the time the 96s came out, they got one of these in the video for themselves. Although they picked this ridiculous burgundy/maroon color which I always hated. They kept it until I grew up and was able to drive, and I sometimes take it for a ride cause it was actually a super great car. The ride was smooth, the car was actually fairly quick imo and I liked that it was low to the ground. It lasted until 2011 when the radiator randomly cracked but coincidentally in the same month my grandparents wanted to change the car out anyway, so it more than served the purpose.
Awe yes nissan in the 80s and up the late 90s was fun, had a 91 maxima 5 speed man that thing could move, the 300 was my dream car, fun times
I remember wanting one of these cars back in the day. It was a solid car from memory. Worked for the dealership where this car was probably picked up from also. Couldn’t afford one at the time. But always fun to drive one.
I'd take these 80s and 90s vehicles back, any day!! Simplicity and reliability. Plus, so many had a stick shift.
Remember when Nissan wasn't a joke?
Of a certain time, this was the 2nd car you ever owned, 5 years used, and commuting to your local state college for a degree in Computer Science, minor in Business.
These were not pretty, but they were great to drive. I miss the 90s!
Loved economy cars like this back then. U saw Civics, Corollas, and Escorts all over the place back then!!!! U could buy a car for 36-48mos back then 😊
Wonderful little car. I enjoyed the earlier SE-R version... For the same used price you could get a much better Infiniti G20 back in the day
This was the second to last generation of Sentra before the CVT was introduced for the Sentra in the 2007 model year.
For 30+ years the Sentra has been a peppy little car with a great price. I once had a 2005 1.8S and loved how peppy it was along with the amazing handling and steering feel. The interior was perfect for the price as it had the right amount of features for a compact car that's a combination of sporty, practical, and an every day driver. The only downside was the limited power output above 3,000 rpm, making it clumsy with passing at higher speeds and accelerating onto highways.
Silent success story
Also this is when Nissan was actually Nissan before the merge.
30 years of development later and the current Sentra has gotten slower
The predecessor B13 Sentra was a better car in my opinion. I loved my 1992 XE 2 door and it looked like a leaner E30 3 Series.
Yeah, I always thought the '91-'94 Sentra looked like a smoothed-out BMW 3-series from the '80s. Just the basic shape, not in the details.
Ahh, back when Nissan was still one of the premier Japanese auto companies😢
Tbh they still made some great engines on into the 2k's, but far too often paired with a garbage cvt transmission that made the entire thing pointless. I still hold out hope Nissan can recover from past leadership mistakes and more importantly break free from their French (not exactly known for the highest build quality) overlords. Toyota has partnerships with both Subaru and Mazda, why not Nissan as well?
Because Toyota has absolutely nothing to gain from a partnership with Nissan.
Great car
Used to own one 😊
Quicker than the 2024 they just tested
Never heard anyone praise the rear suspension beam as an upgrade to previous gens full independent rear.
Awesome
I LOVED these
For some reason, the design of this generation Sentra took a step backwards from the 1991-1994 models. The rear of this 1995 edition just looked odd to me. I never took to it. They were popular, however, and I still see them on the road from time to time, some in good condition.
This B14 Nissan had already been designed in late 1991, when the Japanese economy crashed and they went cheap. The previous one, was a design from 1987 during great economic times.
Nissan went very conservative for the mid 90s after financial woes post 1991 and tried to be exciting again for the Y2K era, but Renault forced cuts on them reducing quality on most released for 2002+.
Next generation Sentra and Xterra were the last pre-Renault controlled designs. After that, Renault influenced Nissans from pre-production changes to wholesale development work (from scratch) depending on closeness to release.
To me, the rear of this Sentra looked like a Saab 900.
@palebeachbum Barely. Both came out at the same time, so just a coincidence.
That passenger airbag panel looked warped.🤷🏻
Probably the most dangerous in that context too. Bulging out, ready to smack someone in the face. 90s airbags on that side of the car, were a bomb waiting to meet its mark.
Very literal in the Altima of this era, so bad Nissan had to revise it abruptly before anyone noticed how bad it was designed. Ended up being sued over it, for blinding people.
Did John Davis say "multi-link beam rear suspension"? This confuses me, is it multi-link independent or torsion beam?
Yeah, that was Nissan's way of making a torsion beam rear suspension sound fancy in marketing materials.
@@th83 Lol, so the marketing department covering for accounting department decisions. I will say a torsion beam done right can be very good, my current car (2021 Mazda 3 turbo hatch) has torsion beam and it rarely calls attention to itself. An ex girlfriend had a 2012 Chevy Equinox that I drove occasionally and the torsion beam was very apparent even in some lower speed bumpy corners. Of course a small crossover isn't designed for handling, but there is a distinct difference in the way Mazda has theirs setup for the platform under the 3, CX-30 and CX-50.
@@jbm0866 LOL, pretty much!
To be fair, Nissan actually did a pretty good job with theirs back in the day. They used it in the Maxima for nearly a decade, and even the Infiniti I30/I35 entry-level luxury sedans had it until the I35 was discontinued after the 2004 model year. The general consensus was that it actually felt "normal" most of the time, with only mid-corner bumps causing the rear-end to sidestep a bit giving away that it wasn't an IRS. I haven't driven any of the new Mazda cars with the torsion beam but I imagine Mazda knows what they're doing. I doubt any normal person could tell the difference haha
@@th83 I've see car reviewers admit they didn't know the latest Mazda 3 has a torsion beam until they looked at the spec sheet after driving for a while. It is noticeable over speed bumps and some extremely bumpy tight corners, but most of the time it feels just like multi-link independent I've had in other cars
That braking looked risky lol! 😂
Popular then, still popular today.
i TRIES to look somewhat like a SAAB 900, if you aquint your eyes
If still see this generation sentra around but never see the early 90s one anymore
Exported abroad, that's why or totaled.
Preferred the two previous generations of the Sentra. They didn't build another attractive Sentra until the most recent full redesign in the late 2010s.
The one I drove couldnt get out of its own way, of course this was in 2019, and the poor Sentra had seen better days being a 95
I can’t believe how long the shift throws are.
Compare the price to a brand new Sentra. Then compare the price of a new Sentra to a new Civic or Corolla. The new Versa replaces this car effectively. Nissan still makes affordable small cars for those who want them.
If the Versa only had a 6 speed automatic, it would be much better and desirable for a lot of people. They could even put the manual in the SR trim and that would help a lot too. People would buy manuals if you could get them in cars with features.
@@LifeAfterLosingHonestly every Nissan with a Jatco CVT would've been vastly be improved with a decent 6-speed torque converter automatic.
I would like a base model with a 6-speed manual but they only offer it with the 5-speed manual. I was also looking at a base model Impreza but Subaru has deleted the manual for even the base model. It's depressing. I hate automatics.
It's true. Over the decades models have been getting larger. The Versa is more comparable in size and amenities to the '90s Sentra. The current Sentra is comparable to the '90s Altima.
Light bar sentra😮
I just feel like typing this out...... *4DSC*
I took my driving test in this car.
This is quite spacious for a "subcompact" car from the 90's. I wonder why MotorWeek would call a Corolla competitor a "subcompact", especially when smaller cars tha this like the Mitsubishi Mirage and Toyota Tercel existed and were on sale in the US at the time.
Because that's the classification that it fits in.
It's not arbitrary or subjective, there's actual government regulations regarding what category the car is in. I don't know what formula they use to determine this, but there are different standards for like fuel economy and safety for different classes.
The definition of full size, midsize, compact and subcompact have changed over time. And carmakers themselves have been blurring the lines. Example: the current Civic is not only larger than the first few generations of Accord, it's also roughly the same size as the late 90's/early 2k's Accord.
As @blisterbrain said, it's a matter of government regulation and based purely on interior cubic volume.... it was somewhere around 95-100 cubic feet that separated subcompact from compact, and I remember even back in the day being confused how a Corolla or Sentra or Escort were all clearly competitors and yet were in different classifications.
40mpg!!!
The last good Nissan ever made before Renault took over. Only one problem they rusted out in the northern states therefor these cars are hard to find.
That's not even accurate. Nissan made many pre-Renault designs up until mid-2001.
I never liked this Sentra because it followed an excellent generation. In its top trim, it was respectable. Anything less seemed like poverty, third-world transportation.
Nissan made reliable cars until around 2003/2004, yet they were struggling financially. They become less reliable and post profits. Why and how?
The Two Cars Nissan Maded The Nissan Maxima & The Nissan Sentra.
I remember the automatic being slower
Kari Springs
Back when Nissan’s were good cars. Not the garbage they are today.
Wow, this test was pretty late in 1995. These came out in January 1995 from what I know, so quite surprised this episode aired November 29, 1995.
What a sensible vehicle. Something lacking in the market today. Everything today seems to only cater to spoiled brats who always need to "have it all."
I had one. It was a lemon. A leak around the windshield, shorted wiring harness, turn signals that only worked if you turned off the radio, windshield washers that broke, immobilizer that turned the car off while driving down the highway, broken hood release, rust rust rust, etc. went to the junk yard with less than 80k miles
Crooks Pines
A standard without a tach? How does that work 😂
Way more common than you would think. You just listen to the engine
Americans wouldnt drive this car today and thats not a shot at the car.
Bingo. That's why subcompacts are slowly being phased out. No more Accent, Fit, Rio, Spark, Sonic, Cruze, and so on.
The last good Sentra
How so? The one after this was fine and the product of Nissan Jidosha KK. It's two generations later that things changed.
I liked the previous-generation boxy Sentra, but this generic jellybean didn't appeal to me. Not a bad car under the skin though.
DOHC was very popular quick power cheap gas let go!
Why does it seem things got worse for small cars ? 40-40 mpg !!!?? Modern cars can’t even compete with all heir fancy hybrid garbage.
Cars have gotten heavier due to added safety equipment and better steel.
El comienzo de la era aburrida de Nissan un modelo sin personalidad
I had this hunk of junk. Reliable as hell, but it was a ride as boring as a watching paint dry.
Please Please Please JD….retire!!! Your bellowing and exaggerated speaking is SO annoying!!! You did so much for the automotive press but your dated style just turns off anyone under 30…..yes I’m being harsh but I’m also speaking truth. If you cannot let go of the reigns Motorweek will be defunct in a handful of years! What does Motorweek share with the most successful automotive social media channels? NOTHING!!!
ooooooof
It looks frumpy, quite possibly the most unattractive generation Sentra ever.
Lmao they looked like old pieces of junk even when new..
Ugliest and Worst quality perseive Nissan ever😢
78384 Huels Rapids