I play EA's Real Racing 3 on my tablet, and my car of choice is the Shelby 427 Cobra... It is SO fast, especially after fully upgrading it to max specs... GREAT game...
You may as well delete this video, go and get the correct information, and try again. The XA, then the XB, were not the first. The first was the XR GT, in 1966-67, then the XT, with an increase to 302 over the earlier models 289. Then the XW, and a 351 was fitted. Phase 1 and 2 were included in the XW. Then the XY Phase 3, with a switch to Cleveland from the Windsor motors, still 351. Then, the XA, Phase 4, and it and others got screwed by idiots and idiots in government. Now do the full research, come back and try again. And I'm a bloody GM and Mopar guy. 😉
Yeah, just another one of those clickbait videos, with a robot voice that can't pronounce things properly... I enjoy seeing people like you SMEAR them across a wall with the proper details... What got me here was the thumbnail picture of a Mustang II with "Faster than a Ferrari" across it... My ex-wife's first car was a ratty old rustbox deathtrap 4-cyl Mustang II... LMFAO...
yeah then you could pretend a two ton fifteen foot long barge shaped like a brick could accelerate to sixty in under five and a half seconds without an all aluminium body and 1500 horse power pushing it !.....................give me a break, most of the figures in this vid were top trump card "stats" that wouldnt even fool a ten year old........if he had said in under FIFTEEN seconds he might have had a point
I really hate it when people talk about something they know nothing about and get it all wrong making themselves look like a dick! The second car on your list is sort of wrong, you are showing both the XA and XB Falcons, similar but different. The XA ran from 72-73 and the XB ran from late 1973- mid 76, the car you are talking about I think is the XA Falcon. At 2:50 you show a completely different earlier model, the XY Falcon GTHO Phase 3 which in 1972 was the fastest 4 door product car in the world!
@@danielcamp4597 In Australia a cop pulled me over for a random breath test and he was driving a FG XR6T and I asked him which was better the Commodore SS or the XR6T and he said that the Commodore had more room inside but if he had to chase someone down then the XR6T was the car to be in. He said that he'd chased down high performance V8's and BMW M3's and Mercedes AMG's cars which are high performance but their drivers are unskilled. He said even the XR6T sold at dealers (police cars are modified) can be a lethal weapon in inexperienced hands. With cars like the XY GTHO Phase 3 you just wouldn't want to go at blistering speeds for they're now too valuable for something to go wrong or the driver to lose control and write the car off
what about the 2008 shelby super snake...around 1,000 were made,my buddy has one,its a garage queen,he keeps it stored in a bubble,he bought it for a investment
Why was the mustang II in the pic? Its not a performance car
หลายเดือนก่อน +3
Why do you continually show in-line six and front wheel drive engine configurations while trying to describe the V8 engine. I know you’re trying to make a quality video but come on really
16:25 That’s funny that the video is describing a 65 289 V8 Mustang but the engine in this frame is a Ford 200 inline-6 capable of about 120HP in stock form.
I don't understand how they make these videos for so much wrong information the Shelby Cobra 500 has a completely different front Grill facial headlights we're completely different than any other Mustang
I hate when car videos like this are produced by people who do NOT know which car they are talking about, let alone use A.I. to voice them! Text to speech programs can be better if when they type in the words to spell them how they sound instead of how they are printed! In example Mach ! would be typed as Mock one to make the A.I. sound better!
HEY AI! a Ford HUMAN die hard fan speaking here, THERE ARE SO MANY mistakes in this video, and even for a AI gen video, i've seen better, but this is NONSENSE, yes there some basic correct information here, but holy hell, this was CRINGY to watch the Mach I as in i ??! and the mix up of wrong photos to the car in question, and BTW the Australian Ford Falcon GT debuted in 1968 and lasted until 1975! and you included a few Shelby GT based Mustang's and NO it's NOT a 2-8-9 IT'S A 289 V8 and by showing an Inline 6cyl, WOW! ZERO points for this 0101010101 made video, A DISGRACE for us Ford fans AND a complete misinformed video for younger generations, and this is ONLY the beginning, this should be taken down as THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! not my opinion, and i KNOW i speak for many Ford/Mercury and Shelby GT350/500 fans here, and topping the list with a one off prototype, inspired by the 2 built '65 based '66 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C "Supernake" and again WRONG HP numbers as the Shelby GT500 "Supersnake" which shared the same set up/engine as the Cobra, a twin Supercharged (Paxton) 427cu.in (Side Oiler) with Hemi heads, aluminum Cross Ram intake with dual Holley 4 b.b.l. carbs.'s producing approx; 700 (gross) HP as opposed to the Cobra which produced approx; 800 (gross) HP, NOW THAT'S just the last one, and what with showing a '68 Fastback in the middle of the '69 Boss 429 Mustang....i could go on, basically ALL the 12 cars/Ford's presented here are FULL of errors, DO better or STICK TO HUMANS making material like this, as there's always error's there too...but at least it's human made, PLEASE STOP!!!
The Shelby Super Snake was not a hemi head. It was a twin McCulloch supercharged 427 FE medium riser. The SOHC was never put in a cobra and that's the only hemi head made for the 427
@@chadkent1241 yes i know it's not a Cammer, there's only one Shelby Cobra Mk III which was built many years later by a guy who worked for Carroll, who were the first to fit the Cammer in a Shelby Cobra "replica" as it was sanctioned/approved by Carroll, and he was quite amazed how this forgotten former race car driver/builder/collector, were able to make it fit, as he told this guy that he and Ken talked about it back then, but they concluded it wouldn't fit, and Jay Leno has a replica with the Cammer too, now i'm just a human as opposed to this "channel" hence my reason for making the comment, as this video annoyed me, now after a few decades of MUCH info absorbed about all things Ford/Shelby and MANY other cars i love, i don't know everything, but thanx for pointing this out, but i was sure Ford used conventional Hemi Heads for the 427 in Drag Racing, mainly, but i remembered wrong, my bad, and i thought Paxton/McCulloch were 2 sides of the same story, as one of them buying the other or something in that vein, and i know i've heard this in many cases when talking about this supercharger, but i might've mixed that up too, but as i said i don't know everything despite being a die hard Ford/Shelby fan, though there's more Ford's i don't care for than i love, like the Mustang from '74-'04 is NOT a Mustang in my world, and i understand why many don't like the '71-'72 models either, which could've been a 2nd gen, so to speak, fun fact the intended scale model for the '69-'70 Shelby looked like a more Shelby like version of what became the '71-'73 Mustang's, and i forgot to mention, as i personally have a soft spot for the '71 model like the Boss 351, which WAS the fastest Mustang in '71, as what is said in this AI gen. video, and yes you had the 9(?) modified/built European '71 Shelby Mustang's too, and yes i do also know about the intake manifold of the Super Snake, another fun fact, the O.G. Super Snake, along the Slalom Snake and the Dragon Snake, were 289 Comp. Cobra's, but i guess you know this, thanx for the info/clearing up, but at least i'm a human and and not a poorly programmed AI, who answered me with an answer that made NO SENSE at all which proves my point further, but just look at the thumbnail photo and you see that there's something wrong here, with the "Mustang" II, NOT a fast Ford hehe
If you’re going to do the video, please, for God sake, do it right the Shelby’s were not produced by Ford. They were produced by Carol Shelby. It was a Ford Mustang body, but that was about it.
I'm out at 0:38. 12 fastest Fords made me curious. But this isn't about that at all. Quickest Muscle Cars is really what's discussed here. This is simple regurgitation of old magazine test results that were simply presented to boost car & magazine sales.
The Ford Mustang “two eight nine” was not a model. It was just an engine badge on the front fender. The early Mustang was not considered a muscle car, but rather a pony car, the first pony car (note to the A.I. - the Mustang is a horse, not a moose). Now, about that 5.2 second zero-sixty from a 225 horse 289 four barrel. Nope. I recall reading a 1965 edition of Popular Mechanics where they tested a 65 Mustang 2+2 with the 271 horse 289 HO, four speed, and 4.11 gears. It ran a 14 second quarter. Don’t remember the zero-60, but it was probably artificially quick. But that test was as quick as I’d seen published for a 65 Mustang. The 289 had potential as evidenced by its racing accolades with Shelby American and other 1960s racers, but the information in this video is most inaccurate at best. Incidentally the Thunderbolt wasn’t necessarily thought of as a muscle car. It was a factory race car, and while a few of them probably did get operated on the street, they were intended for race tracks and sold to credentialed drag racers. Muscle cars are mid or intermediate size two doors with big, high performance motors, not pony cars, not full size cars. GTO is considered the first. Not sure of the last but it was probably a mid 70s Pontiac or Olds with a 400-455, that defined as it was, still made more power than was standard in a station wagon.
ABSOLUTELY!!! I almost mentioned that in my own rant, but figured it to be a minor point and left it alone. There were MUSCLE CARS and there were PONY CARS. Similar, BUT NOT THE SAME!
I’ve ranted about this guy many times. None of his videos are correct. The 1965 / 1966 “Moooostang” Had an A code 2 barrel 200 hp 289, a C code 4 barrel 225 hp 289 and a K code 4 barrel 271 hp 289. None of them would run in the 5’s zero to 60. When dimwit showed the picture of the fabled 289, one was a picture of the straight 6. Oh by the way, the Shelby 289 mustangs were rated at 305 hp. Shelby engines came with a K code engine but had a bigger carb, special intake and Tri-y headers. Not sure how to spell that. LOL but they were 4 pipes into 2 pipes into a single collector on both sides and are expensive to make. I’ve never heard anyone with any knowledge of cars discuss the last Muscle Car, but I would consider the last Muscle Car to be the 6.6 (400) Trans Am. They ran the 455 SD (Super Duty) Trans Am’s up until 75 or 76. The 455 SD was replaced by the 6.6 (400) and it ran until about 1979. Just as the Thunderbolt was a Race Team only car, the Light Weight was also. He refers to the 63 Galaxy as running a 427. The 62 and 63 Galaxies ran 402 engines. The 427 came in the 63 ½. Yes, in the ford lineup there were ½ year models throughout their entire lineup. This guy is just as bad with the other car manufacturers and motorcycle lineups.
The picture of the straight six where a 289 was supposed to be was amusing. Interestingly the difference between muscle car and pony car was getting obscured even in the 80s. I had a 71 Cougar XR7, nothing special - 351C 2V - a rust bucket I decided to sell after buying a new truck and making plans to move out of state for a new job. Didn’t have a place or even time to play with a project and put it up for sale in 1989. One prospective buyer, halfway into the road test told me he really wasn’t interested in buying it, but always wanted to drive a muscle car. At least he was too scared of the awesome power of a 351 two barrel to decide to open it up like I had done to every used car I ever thought about buying. Anyway, I remember at least one car magazine article that tried to clarify the difference between muscle and pony cars. The Popular Mechanics article I mentioned was probably testing a 65 prototype or factory test car even though they didn’t mention any mods. Further, not sure if a buyer could actually get a 4.11 rear end in a 65 Mustang. I don’t know much about the AI being used to make these videos, but it’s obvious that whoever is pressing the keyboard doesn’t know much about the topic. Commenting probably helps the algorithm and makes them money, but I can’t help it when I see stuff that ain’t right. Growing up and coming of driving age in the 70s, I listened to family members who likely embellished a lot of the 60s performance car capabilities. When an uncle who had an old 54 Ford Victoria with a transplanted 312 that he did legitimately drag race talked about whooping a 60s Dodge or Plymouth with a big block, the purported big block car might not have been quite as endowed as led to believe. But that’s our car culture and it still has to be preserved. I will add that same uncle had a friend who had bought a used Thunderbolt when they were obsolete after a couple of years. Took my uncle out for a spin on country blacktops and scared the sh*t out of him. Car was not easy to handle and definitely not a street car. The guy purportedly pulled the motor and sold the car.
@@sombra6153 That was an excellent description of the way it was. Muscle & Pony are DIFFERENT. Sure, the may share some engines, but they're different. Good comment. You said some things that I left out of my own rant.
12 FASTEST is very subjective. It matters on who is doing the testing, the test conditions, when and where the tests were done. AI will never replace real human brains. My guess is that not only was the crappy narration done with AI, but the entire production was AI created. There was not even a hint of actual research done on this production, leave alone the inclusion of critical thinking. It's absolute GARBAGE. More often than not, the facts were flat out f-ing W R O N G!!! i.e. "Number 3. 5.2 seconds 0-60. The 1965 Ford Mustang 'two eight nine' was hailed as one of the fastest muscle cars of the 1960's." Total BS! The 271 HP Mustang DIDN'T do 0-60 in 5.2 sec. More like 6.8. Where was the 1968 428 Cobra Jet? And where was the QUICKEST of all Mustangs...the 1971 BOSS 351? There was no research. No objective human intervention.No sources or citations of evidence of the claims (for instance... "January 1965 SPORTS CAR GRAPHIC Road Test of the Mustang GT") NO CRITICAL THOUGHT. I'm really getting tired of these AI POS TH-cam videos that apparently just write themselves. COMPLETE BS!!!
When street racing back in the eighties most Fords were turds. Believe it or not Mopar had some of the quickest street cars. Fastest guy in the central valley California had a 1969 440 Dart that was on the bottle. Hooked like a beast on public roads. Saw it beat a 9 second drag bike.
I’ve owned a ‘68 Mustang Fastback Cobra Jet, and a newer Cobra. Love mustangs, but those mid ‘70’s Mustang 2’s were gross. At least they didn’t come with an EcoBoost.
DR. Dick will be back next week sometime for his regulary scheduled program. u mean i came this far and spent all my gas money for you to leave me on red? guess so
With all the mistakes in this video you can't take it seriously. Wrong displays of cars, use of computer generated Ai narration, and just plain WRONG and inconsistent car specs and names make this video a JOKE.
AI vid...... pictures do not match words. 65 mustang with 289 was the fastest 0 to 60 of ALL the cars on this list @ 5.2 seconds. Really? Someone is smoking dope. And it is not me............
dad mom is being mean to me she says its time for her to put her foot down..... jjr thats your mother you only get one mother so listen to what she tells u son,,,,,,,
Please teach AI how to pronounce words
He said, "Moostang"..lol
He said Mack I, Mack 1, Mach 1428
Believe they do it on purpose! SINCERELY! I really cannot imagine one cannot mispronounce the same word so many different incorrect ways! J
Please just use human narration again.
says V eight not v8
Enough with the fake A.I. computer voices......just stop it.
First vehicle is not even a Ford. Trash vid!
WTF is a Moosetang?
Shelby's 427 Cobra was the fastest car built in America, and it stood on top for 30+ years! The collection of cars here appears to be chosen randomly.
I play EA's Real Racing 3 on my tablet, and my car of choice is the Shelby 427 Cobra... It is SO fast, especially after fully upgrading it to max specs... GREAT game...
Ford moose-tang😂😂😂😂.
@@Jason-zm9qp is that like sistertang? Asking for Tasmania.
69 Mac one ! It's pronounced Mach I as in speed of sound!
You may as well delete this video, go and get the correct information, and try again. The XA, then the XB, were not the first. The first was the XR GT, in 1966-67, then the XT, with an increase to 302 over the earlier models 289. Then the XW, and a 351 was fitted. Phase 1 and 2 were included in the XW. Then the XY Phase 3, with a switch to Cleveland from the Windsor motors, still 351. Then, the XA, Phase 4, and it and others got screwed by idiots and idiots in government. Now do the full research, come back and try again. And I'm a bloody GM and Mopar guy. 😉
Yeah, just another one of those clickbait videos, with a robot voice that can't pronounce things properly... I enjoy seeing people like you SMEAR them across a wall with the proper details... What got me here was the thumbnail picture of a Mustang II with "Faster than a Ferrari" across it... My ex-wife's first car was a ratty old rustbox deathtrap 4-cyl Mustang II... LMFAO...
Add in 120mph top speed. XRs were doing that in 1967. Try 155 plus mph. Half arsed and very misinformed.
AI commentary really Sucks!
Wow, the Galaxy had a powerful 4 speed transmission!
Image what that powerful transmission would do with an engine on it 😂
yeah then you could pretend a two ton fifteen foot long barge shaped like a brick could accelerate to sixty in under five and a half seconds without an all aluminium body and 1500 horse power pushing it !.....................give me a break, most of the figures in this vid were top trump card "stats" that wouldnt even fool a ten year old........if he had said in under FIFTEEN seconds he might have had a point
Love that Blue Oval
The ol, Moostang sold mostly in Idaho. Most rare is the Moostang Eddie Bow Wow edition. Enjoyed by hardcore camping enthusiest types!
I really hate it when people talk about something they know nothing about and get it all wrong making themselves look like a dick! The second car on your list is sort of wrong, you are showing both the XA and XB Falcons, similar but different. The XA ran from 72-73 and the XB ran from late 1973- mid 76, the car you are talking about I think is the XA Falcon. At 2:50 you show a completely different earlier model, the XY Falcon GTHO Phase 3 which in 1972 was the fastest 4 door product car in the world!
IN THE WORLD. Faster than a lot of Euro cars that were exotics no less.
@@danielcamp4597 In Australia a cop pulled me over for a random breath test and he was driving a FG XR6T and I asked him which was better the Commodore SS or the XR6T and he said that the Commodore had more room inside but if he had to chase someone down then the XR6T was the car to be in. He said that he'd chased down high performance V8's and BMW M3's and Mercedes AMG's cars which are high performance but their drivers are unskilled. He said even the XR6T sold at dealers (police cars are modified) can be a lethal weapon in inexperienced hands. With cars like the XY GTHO Phase 3 you just wouldn't want to go at blistering speeds for they're now too valuable for something to go wrong or the driver to lose control and write the car off
AI is such a load of bull
Think im gonna go to 1 of those Macoom auctions to get me a Moostang.
A.I. ruins everything !
a "powerfull transmission"?
The Capri was essentially an after market car, so shouldn't count.
I bet you could find a real person that could read this without all the screwups
Well, the facts would have to be un-screwed-up before the real human narrated it.
what about the 2008 shelby super snake...around 1,000 were made,my buddy has one,its a garage queen,he keeps it stored in a bubble,he bought it for a investment
There are so many mistakes in this video, least of which the AI pronunciations!
Dumbest ai I have ever imagined torkey and v eight lmao smf
Yeah it's a superidiot
Too bad you ruined a potentially good video with sCrappy AI commentary
Why was the mustang II in the pic? Its not a performance car
Why do you continually show in-line six and front wheel drive engine configurations while trying to describe the V8 engine. I know you’re trying to make a quality video but come on really
16:25 That’s funny that the video is describing a 65 289 V8 Mustang but the engine in this frame is a Ford 200 inline-6 capable of about 120HP in stock form.
I'm pretty sure you could get a 69 Cougar Eliminator with a 302 Boss engine as well.
But then why not put a Thunderbird engine into it, or an Interceptor Turbo Jet for that matter?
Yep. Cougar Eliminator had a Boss 302 option.
Omfg. What is a moose tang. Lol
I don't understand how they make these videos for so much wrong information the Shelby Cobra 500 has a completely different front Grill facial headlights we're completely different than any other Mustang
I hate when car videos like this are produced by people who do NOT know which car they are talking about, let alone use A.I. to voice them! Text to speech programs can be better if when they type in the words to spell them how they sound instead of how they are printed! In example Mach ! would be typed as Mock one to make the A.I. sound better!
I wish I could vote "thumbs-up" 29 times on what you just said.
HEY AI! a Ford HUMAN die hard fan speaking here, THERE ARE SO MANY mistakes in this video, and even for a AI gen video, i've seen better, but this is NONSENSE, yes there some basic correct information here, but holy hell, this was CRINGY to watch the Mach I as in i ??! and the mix up of wrong photos to the car in question, and BTW the Australian Ford Falcon GT debuted in 1968 and lasted until 1975! and you included a few Shelby GT based Mustang's and NO it's NOT a 2-8-9 IT'S A 289 V8 and by showing an Inline 6cyl, WOW! ZERO points for this 0101010101 made video, A DISGRACE for us Ford fans AND a complete misinformed video for younger generations, and this is ONLY the beginning, this should be taken down as THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! not my opinion, and i KNOW i speak for many Ford/Mercury and Shelby GT350/500 fans here, and topping the list with a one off prototype, inspired by the 2 built '65 based '66 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C "Supernake" and again WRONG HP numbers as the Shelby GT500 "Supersnake" which shared the same set up/engine as the Cobra, a twin Supercharged (Paxton) 427cu.in (Side Oiler) with Hemi heads, aluminum Cross Ram intake with dual Holley 4 b.b.l. carbs.'s producing approx; 700 (gross) HP as opposed to the Cobra which produced approx; 800 (gross) HP, NOW THAT'S just the last one, and what with showing a '68 Fastback in the middle of the '69 Boss 429 Mustang....i could go on, basically ALL the 12 cars/Ford's presented here are FULL of errors, DO better or STICK TO HUMANS making material like this, as there's always error's there too...but at least it's human made, PLEASE STOP!!!
Thank you for saying what I was just to tired to write in my own rat. You got it 100% straight.
The Shelby Super Snake was not a hemi head. It was a twin McCulloch supercharged 427 FE medium riser. The SOHC was never put in a cobra and that's the only hemi head made for the 427
@@chadkent1241 yes i know it's not a Cammer, there's only one Shelby Cobra Mk III which was built many years later by a guy who worked for Carroll, who were the first to fit the Cammer in a Shelby Cobra "replica" as it was sanctioned/approved by Carroll, and he was quite amazed how this forgotten former race car driver/builder/collector, were able to make it fit, as he told this guy that he and Ken talked about it back then, but they concluded it wouldn't fit, and Jay Leno has a replica with the Cammer too, now i'm just a human as opposed to this "channel" hence my reason for making the comment, as this video annoyed me, now after a few decades of MUCH info absorbed about all things Ford/Shelby and MANY other cars i love, i don't know everything, but thanx for pointing this out, but i was sure Ford used conventional Hemi Heads for the 427 in Drag Racing, mainly, but i remembered wrong, my bad, and i thought Paxton/McCulloch were 2 sides of the same story, as one of them buying the other or something in that vein, and i know i've heard this in many cases when talking about this supercharger, but i might've mixed that up too, but as i said i don't know everything despite being a die hard Ford/Shelby fan, though there's more Ford's i don't care for than i love, like the Mustang from '74-'04 is NOT a Mustang in my world, and i understand why many don't like the '71-'72 models either, which could've been a 2nd gen, so to speak, fun fact the intended scale model for the '69-'70 Shelby looked like a more Shelby like version of what became the '71-'73 Mustang's, and i forgot to mention, as i personally have a soft spot for the '71 model like the Boss 351, which WAS the fastest Mustang in '71, as what is said in this AI gen. video, and yes you had the 9(?) modified/built European '71 Shelby Mustang's too, and yes i do also know about the intake manifold of the Super Snake, another fun fact, the O.G. Super Snake, along the Slalom Snake and the Dragon Snake, were 289 Comp. Cobra's, but i guess you know this, thanx for the info/clearing up, but at least i'm a human and and not a poorly programmed AI, who answered me with an answer that made NO SENSE at all which proves my point further, but just look at the thumbnail photo and you see that there's something wrong here, with the "Mustang" II, NOT a fast Ford hehe
suspension mods to the boss 429 where done to fit it in
who he pronounces capri...its KA-PREE
I look forward to the Chevrolet episode. I’m always eager to learn more about the Combaro and the Shovelle.😂😂😂
I don't even want to watch the rest of the video when A.I. can't pronounce a MUSTANG not MOOSTANG
I really like the Aussie Ford Falcon and American made Torinos.
If you’re going to do the video, please, for God sake, do it right the Shelby’s were not produced by Ford. They were produced by Carol Shelby. It was a Ford Mustang body, but that was about it.
your ai voice is really anoing
The cougar eliminator for me is a lotto win purchase for sure. I always thought they looked great
I'd like to take my car to Macomb
Moostang...????😂😂
Yep, thumbs down and leaving due to crappy voice over.
I'm out at 0:38. 12 fastest Fords made me curious. But this isn't about that at all. Quickest Muscle Cars is really what's discussed here. This is simple regurgitation of old magazine test results that were simply presented to boost car & magazine sales.
Why are words mispronounced in this video?
Mark one just like a jet plane😂😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤
The Ford Mustang “two eight nine” was not a model. It was just an engine badge on the front fender. The early Mustang was not considered a muscle car, but rather a pony car, the first pony car (note to the A.I. - the Mustang is a horse, not a moose). Now, about that 5.2 second zero-sixty from a 225 horse 289 four barrel. Nope. I recall reading a 1965 edition of Popular Mechanics where they tested a 65 Mustang 2+2 with the 271 horse 289 HO, four speed, and 4.11 gears. It ran a 14 second quarter. Don’t remember the zero-60, but it was probably artificially quick. But that test was as quick as I’d seen published for a 65 Mustang. The 289 had potential as evidenced by its racing accolades with Shelby American and other 1960s racers, but the information in this video is most inaccurate at best. Incidentally the Thunderbolt wasn’t necessarily thought of as a muscle car. It was a factory race car, and while a few of them probably did get operated on the street, they were intended for race tracks and sold to credentialed drag racers. Muscle cars are mid or intermediate size two doors with big, high performance motors, not pony cars, not full size cars. GTO is considered the first. Not sure of the last but it was probably a mid 70s Pontiac or Olds with a 400-455, that defined as it was, still made more power than was standard in a station wagon.
ABSOLUTELY!!! I almost mentioned that in my own rant, but figured it to be a minor point and left it alone. There were MUSCLE CARS and there were PONY CARS. Similar, BUT NOT THE SAME!
I’ve ranted about this guy many times. None of his videos are correct. The 1965 / 1966 “Moooostang” Had an A code 2 barrel 200 hp 289, a C code 4 barrel 225 hp 289 and a K code 4 barrel 271 hp 289. None of them would run in the 5’s zero to 60. When dimwit showed the picture of the fabled 289, one was a picture of the straight 6. Oh by the way, the Shelby 289 mustangs were rated at 305 hp. Shelby engines came with a K code engine but had a bigger carb, special intake and Tri-y headers. Not sure how to spell that. LOL but they were 4 pipes into 2 pipes into a single collector on both sides and are expensive to make.
I’ve never heard anyone with any knowledge of cars discuss the last Muscle Car, but I would consider the last Muscle Car to be the 6.6 (400) Trans Am. They ran the 455 SD (Super Duty) Trans Am’s up until 75 or 76. The 455 SD was replaced by the 6.6 (400) and it ran until about 1979.
Just as the Thunderbolt was a Race Team only car, the Light Weight was also. He refers to the 63 Galaxy as running a 427. The 62 and 63 Galaxies ran 402 engines. The 427 came in the 63 ½. Yes, in the ford lineup there were ½ year models throughout their entire lineup.
This guy is just as bad with the other car manufacturers and motorcycle lineups.
The picture of the straight six where a 289 was supposed to be was amusing. Interestingly the difference between muscle car and pony car was getting obscured even in the 80s. I had a 71 Cougar XR7, nothing special - 351C 2V - a rust bucket I decided to sell after buying a new truck and making plans to move out of state for a new job. Didn’t have a place or even time to play with a project and put it up for sale in 1989. One prospective buyer, halfway into the road test told me he really wasn’t interested in buying it, but always wanted to drive a muscle car. At least he was too scared of the awesome power of a 351 two barrel to decide to open it up like I had done to every used car I ever thought about buying. Anyway, I remember at least one car magazine article that tried to clarify the difference between muscle and pony cars. The Popular Mechanics article I mentioned was probably testing a 65 prototype or factory test car even though they didn’t mention any mods. Further, not sure if a buyer could actually get a 4.11 rear end in a 65 Mustang. I don’t know much about the AI being used to make these videos, but it’s obvious that whoever is pressing the keyboard doesn’t know much about the topic. Commenting probably helps the algorithm and makes them money, but I can’t help it when I see stuff that ain’t right. Growing up and coming of driving age in the 70s, I listened to family members who likely embellished a lot of the 60s performance car capabilities. When an uncle who had an old 54 Ford Victoria with a transplanted 312 that he did legitimately drag race talked about whooping a 60s Dodge or Plymouth with a big block, the purported big block car might not have been quite as endowed as led to believe. But that’s our car culture and it still has to be preserved. I will add that same uncle had a friend who had bought a used Thunderbolt when they were obsolete after a couple of years. Took my uncle out for a spin on country blacktops and scared the sh*t out of him. Car was not easy to handle and definitely not a street car. The guy purportedly pulled the motor and sold the car.
Yeah, and 4.11 gears for the referred to mustang means a top speed of maybe 115-118
@@sombra6153 That was an excellent description of the way it was. Muscle & Pony are DIFFERENT. Sure, the may share some engines, but they're different. Good comment. You said some things that I left out of my own rant.
I have a 1974 Ford Falcon, it has a sweet engine, a 302 Cleveland. And before you call bullshit, look it up.
12 FASTEST is very subjective. It matters on who is doing the testing, the test conditions, when and where the tests were done. AI will never replace real human brains. My guess is that not only was the crappy narration done with AI, but the entire production was AI created. There was not even a hint of actual research done on this production, leave alone the inclusion of critical thinking. It's absolute GARBAGE. More often than not, the facts were flat out f-ing W R O N G!!!
i.e. "Number 3. 5.2 seconds 0-60. The 1965 Ford Mustang 'two eight nine' was hailed as one of the fastest muscle cars of the 1960's." Total BS! The 271 HP Mustang DIDN'T do 0-60 in 5.2 sec. More like 6.8. Where was the 1968 428 Cobra Jet? And where was the QUICKEST of all Mustangs...the 1971 BOSS 351?
There was no research. No objective human intervention.No sources or citations of evidence of the claims (for instance... "January 1965 SPORTS CAR GRAPHIC Road Test of the Mustang GT") NO CRITICAL THOUGHT. I'm really getting tired of these AI POS TH-cam videos that apparently just write themselves. COMPLETE BS!!!
Nice moooostang.
2:25 300 pound feet of Torquey
The small engine have more acceleration of all...
When street racing back in the eighties most Fords were turds. Believe it or not Mopar had some of the quickest street cars. Fastest guy in the central valley California had a 1969 440 Dart that was on the bottle. Hooked like a beast on public roads. Saw it beat a 9 second drag bike.
I’ve owned a ‘68 Mustang Fastback Cobra Jet, and a newer Cobra. Love mustangs, but those mid ‘70’s Mustang 2’s were gross. At least they didn’t come with an EcoBoost.
Mark one just like a jet plane😂😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤ why can’t you just say 289?
Ford mustang GT SVT Cobra those were two different cars
Stop showing Mercury Cougar and 60's Chevy Camaro rear end when talking about Ford Mustang!
28.....9
Uhhhhh, a 1998 bug is faster than the 1st Ferrari!!! A name ain't shit!!!
DR. Dick will be back next week sometime for his regulary scheduled program. u mean i came this far and spent all my gas money for you to leave me on red? guess so
These A.I. channels suck .Full of mistakes in every level
With all the mistakes in this video you can't take it seriously. Wrong displays of cars, use of computer generated Ai narration, and just plain WRONG and inconsistent car specs and names make this video a JOKE.
Call them what you like but the giddie-up pony is an always will be the BEST EVER TO HIT THE PAVEMENT O YA MAN
AI vid...... pictures do not match words. 65 mustang with 289 was the fastest 0 to 60 of ALL the cars on this list @ 5.2 seconds. Really? Someone is smoking dope. And it is not me............
my WRX does it in 5.8 (in the wet)
Ain't no Aussie Ford GT Falcon and never will be. Sounds like a wet fart.
@@donwest5387 did they make these for men?
dad mom is being mean to me she says its time for her to put her foot down..... jjr thats your mother you only get one mother so listen to what she tells u son,,,,,,,
1994 Nissan Sentra SER, 0-60 5.5 seconds stock trim with only 2.0 Liters. Ha ha Ford!
Don't you love the use of a camaro in describing the mustang 😅😂...#youweirdo
This is a complete pile of hot trash.
No factory Ford has run quicker than the 2020 GT500s 10.6 @ 136 mph bone stock.
Ford " Mooose-tang?". AI narration sucks