Being an AI artist myself and done all this before i saw this video I BEG everyone to not flood spotify etc with low quality ai shit. Use it as a tool and not a solution or else ot will backfire to you if you want to have profits in the long term. When i release a track and use ai to help my creativity i still have to put in around 7 to 12h of work to make it somewhat good enough
@@xradical89x Only so much that you can give some workload to ai while you still have to put in a good amount of time. For example in the lyrics or also post production since ai still makes a lot of weird stuff you can never release as it is
If that's the quality of AI I'm really not worried. It's an incredibly bad song. Still, users or creators of AI models need to pay royalties to the artists whose music is used to create this "music".
People have been learning music from others people's music for all time. This is nothing new. I learned to play guitar by learning to play other people's songs. It is how it works. AI is no different. Just better at learning it and applying it. And, it will only get better at it.
@@vintagemusic-y7z No, that's not how it works. I learnt guitar by learning scales, chords, arpeggios, theory, etc. AI is just talking parts of other people's work and puts it together a little bit different. The element of creativity is completely absent. AI is basically just theft.
You are simplifying it way too much. And your telling me you never played a song while learning your instrument? Ludicrous. I also learned scales etc. just like songwriters learn to write songs by listening to other songs. There is a formula that works. There are standard chord progressions that work. All music is theft to a certain extent. People transcribe the playing of great musicians they look up to and learn from that, those musicians learned by sitting in front of the ones they loved and stole from them . I understand the arguments. People are upset that a computer can create a great sounding song with a trumpet solo that sounds fully improvised and not a note for note ripoff of anything. AI learns how that works by listening to others. Just as jazz musicians have done since the beginning of the genre.
@@vintagemusic-y7z Learn to read. There's a difference between AI & Jazz musicians: creativity and feel. No, not all music is theft. That's just what the pop industry wants you to believe.
Everything in music has been built on the backs of those that came before it. That is all I am saying. You don't have to call it theft and just call it inspiration. I have heard and generated some very impressive music on suno that has all the feel you could want in it. I see the day in the not too distant future that some musicians will be out of a job when it comes to advertising and some other television cues business. An ad agency could I put their jingles lyrics and get a nice piece of music for a fraction of the cost of licensing it. That sucks but the genie is out of the bottle. Every iteration of the AI will get better at fooling us all. I don't like arguing. I can certainly see your side. I work with an AI at my job that is being trained on our data. It gets smarter every day. Quite an amazing tool.
if your using Ai to write the lyrics and make the music your not making anything. i use it but i write all the lyrics myself, so their is a human element which i think there does need to be to be called yours.
I agree that this song that I made for this video isn't great. But I've released a couple songs that aren't actually that bad. Borderline good. Check out Dagwood Gypsy Lantern. Subscribe and maybe over time, I'll turn you around on the idea.
@@AiDIYTECH Doesn't matter if you released them. All your songs are worthless and the simple fact that people like you, with zero musical talent or training, are able to upload "songs" is a slap in the face for every serious musician.
@@AiDIYTECH Why don't you strive to create (I mean really create, not telling someone or something else to create) something, actually good (even if only by your own estimation)? You're happy to flood the market with, by your own admission, mediocrity and make it even harder for actual creatives to earn anything from their real creative work?
@@AiDIYTECH The bottom line is, people streaming this wont be streaming real music by real people tryng to earn a living by dedicating themselves to learning instruments and songcraft,
Some of it aint shit tho thats what you missin .. some songs I made with #sunoai are actually pretty dope & not just to me but other people think so to . just like theres shit music created by untalented people there will be shit music created by people using ai it is what it is
What’s going on here 😂 you aware that labels are prepping to sue Suno and Udio? Just saying music is really complex and not a friendly battle ground maybe manage expectations before thinking it’ll be free lunch to collect royalties from Spotify. Even if you do, making music is only a minimal part of a music career. But have fun everyone. I mean that. ✌🏾
Bring all the counter claims via AI generation and watch the attorney's cry, hahaha. They're protecting the law industry rather than the music industry, they have no tie to anything musical, but $$$'s Hello... Set the counterclaims to an AI generated song and play it as your plea in court, lol, watch the heads nod :)
@@sirrobinofloxley7156 that would actually be funny generating a song from counter claim loool, Oh yeh law is big business in music but to be fair the people making Ai are not music people either and many are funded by private equity so everyone's hands are dirty. It's just messy atm
This is specifically a "getting started" youtube channel with learning ai tools. So it is literally starting at the bottom and introducing people to the basics. So in this case, in a race to the bottom, everyone wins.
@@AiDIYTECH starting at the bottom would be learning a skill, this is just pumping out crap with the illusion of control, you are completely wasting your time and anyone that happens to listen to it!
The awesome thing about this stuff is that nobody has to listen to it. But if someone likes something that I put out there, they will and it will make them happy.
@@AiDIYTECH They don't have to listen to it but they have to wade through it. It's just spamming the internet with crap. Not only are you not content with filling Spotify with crap yourself you're now influencing a whole bunch of people to do the same thing. Bad internet citizen IMO.
@@zombizombi I'm totally understanding that some people will think so. And for sure, I've added 2 pretty bad songs. One was me figuring out how to do it and the other was this one just so I could demo it. But at the same time. I've listened to some pretty horrible non ai generated music as well that is on Spotify.
I'm aware. But I don't think the lawsuit is going to be straightforward. All ai borrows from all areas. To shut down ai because it learns from Sony or Warners content will mean Open AI and all the other ai power houses will have to worry. So I don't think it's just going to be Suno's money defending this.
@@UnicornVibesAIMusicwhy would you ask the Ai to produce the material just like (insert here) and then complain it sounds just like the artist your input 😂
AI content should be exempt from Spotify royalties. It dilutes the pot with crap. If you want to create it and sell it to mugs then fine but don't muddy the waters of actually creative people.
AI is the evolution of the way art is going to be created,.. it's not going away. It's not directly stealing from any of these artists and that style of creating art isn't going away anytime soon either... so quit complaining about it.
@@Icewarrior101 Yeah but... it's pretty rubbish at best so if that's what you want to consume then fine,, that's up to you. You can be happy with your homogenised generic nonsense with no soul. However, most people with a modicum of discerning taste will get bored and fed up of it sooner or later and real artists creating real art will be revered once again. It may not go away completely but the novelty will wear off. I'll complain about it as often and as long as I like, thank you.
@@jiveaces Cry like a little baby then. I'll continue to create AI music despite your crying.. it's the future of the way art is going to be created. Everyone wants things to expand and turn futuristic yet once these changes start taking place everyone freaks out about it.. pretty typical nonsense... Rock concerts and artists aren't going away anytime soon and I still support them.. so crying about AI does nothing. Just gives those of us who don't have that kind of talent or resources a taste of what they do.
Every day I heard that 160000 songs were added to spotify and with AI it will just explode to 1 milllion, I doubt you can get any royalties. The only way is to make concert as a real artist if you want to win some money
Albums by the same 'AI artist' are not yet possible. They will have to do a Midjourney and give us the tools to create a consistent sound. I always think about this when I create something I like in Suno/Udio, I wish I could create more songs with the same vocalist and sound. When we can do that we will be able to make AI albums.
This is the dream for me. I've been experimenting with ways to modify the vocals in other ai tools and eventually I'll do something about that in a video. But for now, we've got what we've got.
Well it is possible yall - but I aint got it down to a perfect science just yet. I created 5 Suno ai artists each with there own album that got 2 or more songs on it .. the first time it happen it was a happy accident but then I notice that certain prompts elements & genres produce the same ai voice or ai voice that sound almost identical to the original one but I aint figured out yet how to make this happen every time because it only work sometimes .
Someone hasn't been paying attention to copyright laws. You might want to check if you're actually going to cash in on that AI music. You can't copyright music in the US unless it's been created by a person. That means if AI composed your music someone else can just take it. I'm not against using AI in music but you jumped the gun on this video.
@@zvoidx the lyrics were AI was well and there is already a case where and artist combined work with AI and the government wouldn’t allow the copyright. What he is telling people to do is not taking the proper measures to protect your music and trying to make a quick buck. He in his examples did not write the lyrics or the music he’s misleading people.
@@zvoidx Tech is moving too fast for the laws to keep up. You can copyright your lyrics true, but the combination of AI and human-made hasn't been breached yet. I'm working on a project that I'm writing and using AI so I've been keeping a close eye on this. What this guy is suggesting is reckless and could cause problems down the line. He's not the first one to think all he has to do is let the computer write it for him and he can just cash in. But the case I'm referring to was with a piece of visual art that was both AI and human. Top music attorney's channel covered it I think. She's been doing deeper dives into the legal ramifications of AI since there's also a concern as to who this music is using to model itself after.
I've been looking at the rulings and there's a lot of grey space around this. Off the top of my head, it says something like "If created with no human interaction". But as soon as a human prompts the ai, you have human interaction. Not only that, but in my case, normally when I produce a song, I do a lot of work on the lyrics after I get my initial results.
Ah, yes. The inevitable "Here's how you can make money from"... video bs. Boy you gotta stay on your toes to stay ahead of all these con artists. But for all the simps out there, let me just break it down for you to it's most basic message. If something looks too good to be true, then chances are, it ISN'T true.
To everybody sayin all ai music is trash yall gotta know there is dope ai music out here .. mine included 💯 Turned my small gaming channel into a ai music channel during the solar eclipse for a way to keep me focus on what I love doin which is creating beats & tracks .. got a few lit tracks gettin a lotta views which make me feel good that ppl chill to em. Idk how some ppl satisfied putting in a basic prompt just to get a pos track & then call it music .. Im use to writing my own lyrics anyway so I did that when I first started using Suno ai & after workin with it alot I learn to put diff prompts to get good results but when I started puttin in music notes manually with vocal tones, chord progressions, tempo, guitar riffs etc dayumm it put my tracks on another level 👀 Taste in music is subjective so that mean that diff ppl will chill to diff kinda music dont matter if made by ai or human .. if it bops it drops 🤟🏽 peace peace
There is a difference between using AI to make music, and using AI to make money, by abusing a system made for artists (which is the topic of this video).
@@clarkkent6354 I gave you a like bc I agree with what you said .. I make tracks bc its fun & keeps me focus on doin somthing positive. I got ppl tellin me I should put some of my tracks on spotify but I aint happy with the suno sound production sometimes it can sound echoey or muffled .. even tho I tweak it the track quality is still lacking so I wont ever put none of my tracks on spotify unless I could raise the sound quality. I think theres enough room on spotify for ai track creators like me & music artists but the ai track creators should put up quality tracks on spotify not the generic ai shit floating around on yt & instead of abusing the system they should use the system to share quality ai music with ppl bc aint that the whole fkn point ?
No never. Only what is produced by a human. Had he written the lyrics at least, that portion could be copyrighted. He didn't feed the AI the lyrics. Anyone can use his track and he will have no leverage to enforce copyright. Even the cover art can't be claimed. Artist have it worse than musicians when it comes to AI. Write all the lyrics to have any chance for protection and claims. U.S. Copyright Office AI Activities The Office explained that human authorship is required for copyright protection, that it will refuse to register works solely generated by AI, and that any material which is not the product of human authorship must be disclaimed on a registration application.
Copyright law, concerning AI, hasn't even been written yet. And, as soon as they write something that cages AI, then the AI people are going to stretch the boundaries further, and further and further, until copyright will be a thing of the past because with AI you'll basically have 100% access to everything that's not nukes, n stuff. Bit like TPB, keep us locked up and tomorrow there'll be10, then 100, then 1,000 etc ad infinitum.
The sound is too poor , AI were trained with MP3 at 20KHZ, real music is a WAV at 48khz. The best choice is record in a studio the great ideas that AI have found, I have a friend that is a a famous producer that already work this way.
What will be interesting is when Suno drops V4. You will be able to upload your own sounds/music to the app and it will use that as a reference. I'm not sure how that will work with copyright as you are contributing to the generation output yourself.
If its your own music or audio that you upload then it will be your copyright as its your own ideas and creations being used then the A.i just becomes a tool to assist you.
@@dagga07 Glad I read your comment, that's really good to know because I write all of my songs myself I don't use chatGPT or any other AI that assists with writing
That’s the already existent for around 12 days (ironically the day you posted this) in 3.5. It’s that bright yellow high visibility area that says “Upload Audio"
If they're good albums, this is great news. I still look for all sorts of music personally and assume everyone does. Human and ai music. I'll listen to all of it.
Absolutely, the rise of AI in music is definitely going to shake things up on platforms like Spotify! However, I believe there's room for both established artists and new forms of AI music. Personally, I’m not looking to replace traditional artists but to add to the diversity of what’s available. Think of it like Alvin and the Chipmunks for the modern era-AI characters with unique personalities, like Suno and Udio, who bring something fun and different to the music scene. It’s all about expanding our musical horizons, not limiting them. Great insights in the video!
@@giannipulli I gotta push back on the "junk music" label for AI. I've been listening to both AI and regular music recently, and AI has actually opened my eyes to how much repetitive stuff is out there, you know? Remakes, recycled styles - it's kind of like fast food music sometimes. AI music, on the other hand, feels like a whole new genre. It's early days, sure, but it's got that TH-cam explosion vibe - rough around the edges, but with endless potential. Imagine what it could be like when it reaches a MrBeast level of polish! The creativity could be insane.
@@giannipulli Absolutely. Maybe this will be the final straw and the downfall of streaming services will accelerate now that every ignorant "creator" can upload junk like this.
Thanks Rob I really think that's true. The tech will get better and I'll get better at producing this stuff. In the future, I might even do another video that drills down further to make it even more yours. I really appreciate the watch and the comment.
I released a few demos with Suno with lyrics I wrote myself. I'm honestly not satisfied with not producing the songs myself, at least partly. Currently working on producing new versions that use much more of my own touch. Some AI will be used, mostly with vocals because I hate my own voice. But I really want my own touch to the music, beyond the lyrics. AI should not be used for creating serious productions, at least not entirely. It's one thing to use some AI but still have your own touch to it, but to just have computers do it all and then release it as art is just soulless and stupid. I have some AI songs on my channel, yes, but those were just created as a gag. It's pop country with lyrics about Information Technology. But I'm not making money off of royalties with those. They were created as a joke. I hate bro country, don't care about the genre whatsoever, and did not want to waste any effort on something that is meant to be just a funny gag.
Kool tune. Can't get a copyright for any of it. You AI'd the whole damn thing. Even the cover art. Had you at least written the lyrics and fed those to the AI to generate the music for the track. Then you could copyright the lyrics portion of the song. You can make money off the track. just can't protect the track with the legal might of copyright. Anyone can use any and all of the track in their works without worries for compensation of any royalties to you. All you can collect is what you directly get setup for revenue streams. No outreach from DistroKid say on to someone's TH-cam channel that posts this track has to worry about real legalities. I'm sure there will be false copyright notices spammed. We can ignore all of it and just wade through the emails like we do now using licensed loop tracks we get hit up for now.
It's been a few weeks since I made this video. But I swear I mentioned that this was made very basic. I didn't alter the lyrics very much in the making of this video. Normally, I spend at least a week working the lyrics. Hey, look up my other works. Praise Be Vinyl. Enjoy the soothing sounds.
This song of mine (Metal) is partially done with UDIO. I mean, instrumental is something I've written, and the lyrics too. But the voices are not. I am a guitarrist, so, guitars, bass and solos are me, but the rest is pure AI th-cam.com/video/l0maOm_ap1Q/w-d-xo.html
Suno is superb at lyrics. You are obviously not prompting universal subject matters. The one criticism is that it usually includes the genre in the lyrics so I regenerate after editing this out in the custom lyrics.
You wont make any money. Music money is based off buys, streaming royalties pays nothing. You can have a streaming song with a million streams and only get 50 dollars from it, good luck trying to hit those numbers.
You can't collect royalties on non copyrightable material... Anything generated by AI isn't copyrightable under the copyright act of 1976. Quit while you're ahead, this is soulless and boring.
There is nothing currently saying you can't copyright ai material. The biggest legal case said that one instance couldn't be. But nowhere does it state you can't. And I'm sorry to hear that you don't appreciate my soothing and loving tunes. I feel very motivated to work harder and win you over. Subscribe and follow my channel.
@@AiDIYTECH yes there is, on copyright dot gov they have faqs that explain their decision, and they detail that it has to be created by a human, and that prompting is not considered created by a human because copyright gov interprets the final production to be still all created by the ai. So they detail that what the human has created is the only part that can be copyrighted. So say you wrote the lyrics ,and prompted ai to do the music, you will fill that out on the copyright form, and the copyright office will approve copyright for the lyrics, but the music will not be copyrighted, but it will be noted to be ai created. So, in effect, you are listed to be the copyright owner for the lyrics part of the song. I have no idea how something like that can be marketed; all the same, since streaming pays garbage, in a way, it doesn't matter, as we are now giving away our labor in essence. Still if you endeavor to put this on spotify, it is better to take the ai music, and use it as inspiration to create your own, then you can claim ownership on the music as well. Still, you are working to get $0.003 per stream, and as of now, Spotify is not paying anything at all to artists who have less than 1,000 streams per month. So, as of April 2024, any song you put on Spotify will get you $0 each and ever month you have less than 1,000 streams. Those streams do not accumulate each passing month, but reset at 0 each new month, so it even more has become a losing effort to make money as an artist. And now this ai strategy to flood streaming platforms already flooded may cause other platforms to copy spotify to pay $0 if streams are less than 1,000, effectively making music as a profession, a joke due to massive saturation.
Yooo buddy you only want to keep lyrics in the lyrics spot. No titles or anything but lyrics.. if you want a great song to come out you can create your own style by combining multiple genras together and blend. Only use 6 to blend.. and think of words outside of the box to create a killer song..suno is not that good at all to use , try Donna..hmu any help u need im jimi check my music out you'll c I no what im talking about lol
haha, thanks CS, I wasn't sure but I didn't automatically take it as a bad thing. And I do very much appreciate your views. And when I said "views" I mean watching my video.
I wonder about the legalities. Udio generated a song for me with a voice that sounded exactly like Johnny Cash. I love the result, but it just seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen since his voice is so unique. Kind of like the whole OpenAI and Scar Jo controversy.
"if you're not a musician and you want to publish something to spotify" - now that, being a musician myself, just makes me cringe. i've barely come to grips with the whole splice samples culture over the last few years, but now this just blows my mind. it's disrespectful and demeaning to the art form itself and the people who have and still do put in hours upon hours of learning and then even more time and effort into creating their art, and i'm not even talking about talent at this point. i think im gonna stop here because if i don't this will turn into a two-hour long rant and i don't want to waste a minute more of my time here. goodbye.
I understand the feeling and I expected this. In one of my more recent video's you can see at least one music industry person in an interview who thinks creating more access to creative tools is a good thing for the industry. I'm not trying to win you over on this. I think it's too early to assume everyone is going to universally love this. But not everyone in the music industry agrees that this is bad.
@@AiDIYTECH You do know that the "music industry" isn't the musicians friend, right? It's the real artists that struggle. The music industry is nothing more than a cash cow for business types, especially today.
I feel your pain. I record my own lyrics and I play the instruments. This guy has no integrity. I don't think non-musicians have any idea what goes into music. I pour my heart and soul into it, exposing my whole self to the world. And then this guy comes in and tells the computer to do it, and then to make money on it?! Talk about insult to injury. F***!
Keep making music, All ai music sounds great, I am a songwriter but can’t always afford to make a demo and pay a high price for a singer, just to have a record label not like it, then write my song have ai put music to my creation and all my family and friends want more. So it’s the industry that wants to stop my creativity, and the artist say I’m the problem. So you don’t think I put work into my lyrics, just because I don’t have a singing voice my creativity isn’t worth anything. Now we have a solution. I’d rather listen to everyday people’s creativity than the rinse and repeat shit the record labels put out.
Anyone can point me to link swhich say how exactly the AI law or regulation applied in any creative fields? Is the law bind globally or different for each countries ? Stealing ideas not new things , copyright stealing in industrial design etc happens all the time , so where the law or regulations for it ?
Only a human can claim copyright is where we currently are. Although the terms of use will try to say the app owns it, it’s not true… ai obviously didn’t do EVERYTHING, so they can’t claim ownership
Use mickey mouse creation, get mickey mouse results. Performance Rights ORganizations (ASCAP, BMI, SEASAC etc…) do not collect royalties on anything the US Copyright Office will not register which includes AI generated music or songs. They have their own AI's that instantly can detect if it is AI generated. Aside from Spotify usage there is no money. Anyone is free to rip-off your "masterpiece" . If you try to submit for media usage or licensing and it gets flagged, you can be sued for damages. A simple "sound-a-like" track cost its "content creator" $500k and they slapped a lien on his house faster than you can click your mouse.
Hi, thanks for the question. Yes, I do have ChatGpt4 and it is a paid version. But you can try other free generation tools. Midjourney is great but you need to use it through their Discord.
It's such a grey area right now. The legislation was really focused on image creation when it comes to what is considered "yours". But it doesn't limit it to just image creation. It broadly says something like "If no human interaction in your art". But other than this song, I've done things to more than just the lyrics. I've done some audio editing and enhancements. So even though the music is sung by and the instruments are played by ai, there's still a lot of involvement on my part. Spotify and the music publishers don't ask and don't seem to care if ai have a hand in your production. So go ahead and ask for payments. It takes a long time to build up a payment though. Fractions of a cent on every play.
@@AiDIYTECH the reason they let you is so they can later sue you for a lot of money. spotify doesnt care if your music is legal or not as its not them at risk. you wont get royalties please check out Top music Attorneys youtube channel to see that you are giving out the wrong information.
@@rifsz you can get royalties if you wrote the lyrics. you will get the writers proportion of the royalties but you will not get any for the singer portion as you are not the singer. if the singer is A.I then nobody gets the singers portion of the royalties.
Really useful video. I got into doing these songs a couple of weeks ago and haven't had this much fun in years. I've had comments telling me to put my stuff on Spotify but have never used Spotify, is it worth going on?
@@ratatatuffit won't be zero coz if you do the right lyrics you going to attract many people even if it's done with AI as long as all the lyrics you write yourself and the sound is right you will get royalty from any music streamer so some of the real artist made their money it's time for normal people to make some extra income so they can buy some nice stuff as well as normal people made rich the artist people as they are still lessening to their favorite artist like I do with Eminem I grow up with him and I will still lessen to him until I die anyway to future is here everyone should embrace it as it will get bigger in the next 5 years alot bigger 😊
Your opening statement where you said you had an "original" song made through "AI tools" is an oxymoron and then to top it off with making money for it is a huge insult to working musicians. Shameful.
Sorry to come to this a bit late. I was having a chat to a friend of mine last night about this topic. He's been in a band and writes his own music etc. Nobody ever said you can't copywrite AI music. From my understand, nobody has done it yet. There's nothing saying you can't do it. And for sure, you absolutely protect the lyrics that you write. Totally happy to be told otherwise. But what good would the music be without the words?
@AiDIYTECH check out Top music Attorney youtube channel, she explains that courts have ruled that you cannot Copyright A.i created work. Prompting a.i. is not enough to classify it as your own work. Also you cannot collect royalties from a.i. music and what ever you create will be public domain so anyone else can use it. Best place to get your info in this case is the music Attorneys. You clearly used chat gpt for lyrics too so they cannot be Copyright protected either. If you register it as your own work you are breaking current laws.
@dagga07 What if you only use the AI to generate songs you've written lyrics for and then simply using the AI output as a template for live musicians to expand upon further? Surely THAT could be copyrighted?
Hi! great content! I have some questions. What will happen if I upload the song from free Suno to Distrokid to be distributed to Spotify? Will the music get banned? Is there any other distributors approve AI music? Thank you in advance!
if you do that you will probably be sued for a lot of money first by suno as they say you cannot use any music you generate if you only have a free account. second distrokid because you cannot register music with them if you dont own it. andyou cannot own it as you cannot copyright a.i. generated work.
Hi, sorry for the late reply. I did read the terms a while back. I believe with Suno, if you have a paid subscription, it's yours and they mentioned that you don't have to credit. But say something along the lines of "But it would be nice". (Terms change, so have a look). The free version, they require you to give them credit.
@@AiDIYTECH The credit is in the watermark, having a free account and not crediting them, for instance downloading an audio file from them, would be poor form. As for 'Muh ownership' and all that gibberish, they may have legal title, but as for equitable title, they can't make without clients. Obviously SONY et al are going to take judges on vaykay with their 'advocats', in bikinis, and sometimes not, but as to whether they'd be right would merely be their opinion. Let's say the tech wasn't wrapped up in iron clad monopoly world, and people had genuine means to freely express, using SUNO, how much are they going to make when they're a literal household name. Jack and Jane from down the lane could host their own original parties for free, using music they've created, why would you want to spoil Jack and Jane's fun just because of the money? If there's means to make, super, and when there's means to offset it with fame, then even superer. Look at charities, their basic idea was to help people freely, look at the size now of that industry, it's a no brainer. Sure, if you have servers to pay for etc, then yeah, you need to balance the books, but when your like Samsung, and have $300 trillion that you don't know what to do with, then it's time to do the right thing. SUNO sponsored by Samsung for a better world?
Not only does it dilute the pot but it literally steals from genuine artists who are already *massively* struggling. Take a good look in the mirror and give your head a wobble mate - this is just embarrassing.
Hope you're not using chat gpt or any sort of ai that borrows from other sources and people who have contributed to those sources. Or is it just bad if using ai for music? Just asking.
This is an insult and a betrayal to the human musicians your software is stealing from. All you are doing is leaching royalties away from people who actually earned them. It's only a matter of time until all music on Spotify made in the 2020's is ineligible for royalties.
No editing, mastering etc? You missed out an essential step.
Being an AI artist myself and done all this before i saw this video I BEG everyone to not flood spotify etc with low quality ai shit. Use it as a tool and not a solution or else ot will backfire to you if you want to have profits in the long term.
When i release a track and use ai to help my creativity i still have to put in around 7 to 12h of work to make it somewhat good enough
you're an ai artist? what does that even mean?
@@xradical89x Only so much that you can give some workload to ai while you still have to put in a good amount of time. For example in the lyrics or also post production since ai still makes a lot of weird stuff you can never release as it is
if you google 'enshitification' this dude's picture comes up
Yeah thats what we call theft
If that's the quality of AI I'm really not worried. It's an incredibly bad song. Still, users or creators of AI models need to pay royalties to the artists whose music is used to create this "music".
People have been learning music from others people's music for all time. This is nothing new. I learned to play guitar by learning to play other people's songs. It is how it works. AI is no different. Just better at learning it and applying it. And, it will only get better at it.
@@vintagemusic-y7z No, that's not how it works. I learnt guitar by learning scales, chords, arpeggios, theory, etc.
AI is just talking parts of other people's work and puts it together a little bit different. The element of creativity is completely absent. AI is basically just theft.
You are simplifying it way too much. And your telling me you never played a song while learning your instrument? Ludicrous. I also learned scales etc. just like songwriters learn to write songs by listening to other songs. There is a formula that works. There are standard chord progressions that work. All music is theft to a certain extent. People transcribe the playing of great musicians they look up to and learn from that, those musicians learned by sitting in front of the ones they loved and stole from them . I understand the arguments. People are upset that a computer can create a great sounding song with a trumpet solo that sounds fully improvised and not a note for note ripoff of anything. AI learns how that works by listening to others. Just as jazz musicians have done since the beginning of the genre.
@@vintagemusic-y7z Learn to read. There's a difference between AI & Jazz musicians: creativity and feel. No, not all music is theft. That's just what the pop industry wants you to believe.
Everything in music has been built on the backs of those that came before it. That is all I am saying. You don't have to call it theft and just call it inspiration. I have heard and generated some very impressive music on suno that has all the feel you could want in it. I see the day in the not too distant future that some musicians will be out of a job when it comes to advertising and some other television cues business. An ad agency could I put their jingles lyrics and get a nice piece of music for a fraction of the cost of licensing it. That sucks but the genie is out of the bottle. Every iteration of the AI will get better at fooling us all. I don't like arguing. I can certainly see your side. I work with an AI at my job that is being trained on our data. It gets smarter every day. Quite an amazing tool.
Anything AI created should have a stamp : "This was created by a robot without creative input"
Womp womp
I put my creativity in my songs by writing the lyrics and just use sunoAI to finish off the rest.. As AI can't write lyrics that well
@@UnicornVibesAIMusic Then, is it really "your song" ? I'd call your part of the work "poetry" and the AI's "music".
So you just gave a computer poetry to sing for you?@@UnicornVibesAIMusic
@@LiLComeInClutch 😂 yea basically, even that takes time to do, getting the right sound I need can take hours.
if your using Ai to write the lyrics and make the music your not making anything. i use it but i write all the lyrics myself, so their is a human element which i think there does need to be to be called yours.
I agree. At least write the lyrics yourself.
So people streaming Spotify are going to have to listen to this trash?
lol
They don't have to.
Im not touching that stuff and no one should
Flood the streaming platforms with shit music, that's what we all want of course
I agree that this song that I made for this video isn't great. But I've released a couple songs that aren't actually that bad. Borderline good. Check out Dagwood Gypsy Lantern. Subscribe and maybe over time, I'll turn you around on the idea.
@@AiDIYTECH Doesn't matter if you released them. All your songs are worthless and the simple fact that people like you, with zero musical talent or training, are able to upload "songs" is a slap in the face for every serious musician.
@@AiDIYTECH Why don't you strive to create (I mean really create, not telling someone or something else to create) something, actually good (even if only by your own estimation)? You're happy to flood the market with, by your own admission, mediocrity and make it even harder for actual creatives to earn anything from their real creative work?
@@AiDIYTECH The bottom line is, people streaming this wont be streaming real music by real people tryng to earn a living by dedicating themselves to learning instruments and songcraft,
Some of it aint shit tho thats what you missin .. some songs I made with #sunoai are actually pretty dope & not just to me but other people think so to . just like theres shit music created by untalented people there will be shit music created by people using ai it is what it is
What’s going on here 😂 you aware that labels are prepping to sue Suno and Udio? Just saying music is really complex and not a friendly battle ground maybe manage expectations before thinking it’ll be free lunch to collect royalties from Spotify.
Even if you do, making music is only a minimal part of a music career.
But have fun everyone. I mean that. ✌🏾
Bring all the counter claims via AI generation and watch the attorney's cry, hahaha. They're protecting the law industry rather than the music industry, they have no tie to anything musical, but $$$'s Hello... Set the counterclaims to an AI generated song and play it as your plea in court, lol, watch the heads nod :)
@@sirrobinofloxley7156 that would actually be funny generating a song from counter claim loool, Oh yeh law is big business in music but to be fair the people making Ai are not music people either and many are funded by private equity so everyone's hands are dirty.
It's just messy atm
the race to the absolute bottom has begun...
This is specifically a "getting started" youtube channel with learning ai tools. So it is literally starting at the bottom and introducing people to the basics. So in this case, in a race to the bottom, everyone wins.
@@AiDIYTECH starting at the bottom would be learning a skill, this is just pumping out crap with the illusion of control, you are completely wasting your time and anyone that happens to listen to it!
@@NixCM You painted the Sistene Chapel ceiling on your first day as a painter?
@@sirrobinofloxley7156 lol no i stated with a pencil, you are asking the local one man band to make your fist steps for you!
@@Super-id7bq I guess read the channel description. ... I ... I'm not sure what to tell you
Let's ruin the internet even more more everyone! Yeah!!
The awesome thing about this stuff is that nobody has to listen to it. But if someone likes something that I put out there, they will and it will make them happy.
@@AiDIYTECH They don't have to listen to it but they have to wade through it. It's just spamming the internet with crap. Not only are you not content with filling Spotify with crap yourself you're now influencing a whole bunch of people to do the same thing. Bad internet citizen IMO.
@@zombizombi I'm totally understanding that some people will think so. And for sure, I've added 2 pretty bad songs. One was me figuring out how to do it and the other was this one just so I could demo it. But at the same time. I've listened to some pretty horrible non ai generated music as well that is on Spotify.
I dont know.... but Suno and Udio caught the attention of the big labels of Sony, Warner, and Universal. Its only a matter of time.
I'm aware. But I don't think the lawsuit is going to be straightforward. All ai borrows from all areas. To shut down ai because it learns from Sony or Warners content will mean Open AI and all the other ai power houses will have to worry. So I don't think it's just going to be Suno's money defending this.
@@AiDIYTECH suno has been caught stealing and outputting producer tags verbatim, it's.... pretty straightfoward copyright infringement actually.
@@winxpusr Udio is the worst nearly makes music sound like the original songs
@@UnicornVibesAIMusicwhy would you ask the Ai to produce the material just like (insert here) and then complain it sounds just like the artist your input 😂
So cool! And now Spotify will be fuller of not just lousy music, but also synthetic poser music.
Well done sir! 👎
yeah found it on Spotify. Strangely doesn't come up when search directly for the song.
it's shadow banned now
@@jackthetrader1993 What is?
AI content should be exempt from Spotify royalties. It dilutes the pot with crap. If you want to create it and sell it to mugs then fine but don't muddy the waters of actually creative people.
What if the music is better than what's available? Is it AI's fault it works well?
@@sirrobinofloxley7156 Is it really, though?
AI is the evolution of the way art is going to be created,.. it's not going away. It's not directly stealing from any of these artists and that style of creating art isn't going away anytime soon either... so quit complaining about it.
@@Icewarrior101 Yeah but... it's pretty rubbish at best so if that's what you want to consume then fine,, that's up to you. You can be happy with your homogenised generic nonsense with no soul. However, most people with a modicum of discerning taste will get bored and fed up of it sooner or later and real artists creating real art will be revered once again. It may not go away completely but the novelty will wear off. I'll complain about it as often and as long as I like, thank you.
@@jiveaces Cry like a little baby then. I'll continue to create AI music despite your crying.. it's the future of the way art is going to be created. Everyone wants things to expand and turn futuristic yet once these changes start taking place everyone freaks out about it.. pretty typical nonsense... Rock concerts and artists aren't going away anytime soon and I still support them.. so crying about AI does nothing. Just gives those of us who don't have that kind of talent or resources a taste of what they do.
Every day I heard that 160000 songs were added to spotify and with AI it will just explode to 1 milllion, I doubt you can get any royalties. The only way is to make concert as a real artist if you want to win some money
Albums by the same 'AI artist' are not yet possible. They will have to do a Midjourney and give us the tools to create a consistent sound. I always think about this when I create something I like in Suno/Udio, I wish I could create more songs with the same vocalist and sound. When we can do that we will be able to make AI albums.
This is the dream for me. I've been experimenting with ways to modify the vocals in other ai tools and eventually I'll do something about that in a video. But for now, we've got what we've got.
Clone voices. I would say clone only "nobodies" don't clone anyone famous or well known
You're stretching the definition of "create" very thinly there I see...
Well it is possible yall - but I aint got it down to a perfect science just yet. I created 5 Suno ai artists each with there own album that got 2 or more songs on it .. the first time it happen it was a happy accident but then I notice that certain prompts elements & genres produce the same ai voice or ai voice that sound almost identical to the original one but I aint figured out yet how to make this happen every time because it only work sometimes .
@@AiDIYTECH Yea it is for me to bro & I'm able to do it but only sometimes because I aint figured out yet how to do it on a consistent basis
Nauseating.
Good thing AI sucks at writing lyrics and so do AI bros.
I appreciate that some people won't like this.
Someone hasn't been paying attention to copyright laws. You might want to check if you're actually going to cash in on that AI music. You can't copyright music in the US unless it's been created by a person. That means if AI composed your music someone else can just take it. I'm not against using AI in music but you jumped the gun on this video.
True, but if you write the lyrics they are copyrighted.
@@zvoidx the lyrics were AI was well and there is already a case where and artist combined work with AI and the government wouldn’t allow the copyright. What he is telling people to do is not taking the proper measures to protect your music and trying to make a quick buck. He in his examples did not write the lyrics or the music he’s misleading people.
@@RetroReprise I wasn't aware of that case. I was thinking that they would have to copy the music and change the lyrics but I could be wrong.
@@zvoidx Tech is moving too fast for the laws to keep up. You can copyright your lyrics true, but the combination of AI and human-made hasn't been breached yet. I'm working on a project that I'm writing and using AI so I've been keeping a close eye on this. What this guy is suggesting is reckless and could cause problems down the line. He's not the first one to think all he has to do is let the computer write it for him and he can just cash in. But the case I'm referring to was with a piece of visual art that was both AI and human. Top music attorney's channel covered it I think. She's been doing deeper dives into the legal ramifications of AI since there's also a concern as to who this music is using to model itself after.
I've been looking at the rulings and there's a lot of grey space around this. Off the top of my head, it says something like "If created with no human interaction".
But as soon as a human prompts the ai, you have human interaction. Not only that, but in my case, normally when I produce a song, I do a lot of work on the lyrics after I get my initial results.
Original song? No an average of all the songs you've ripped off!
I feel like we can meet halfway somehow. Subscribe for more average songs.
That music is terrible.
I agree. I think I may even have mentioned that as part of the video. Try a few others. This was to demo the process. You can take it from there.
Ah, yes. The inevitable "Here's how you can make money from"...
video bs.
Boy you gotta stay on your toes to stay ahead of all these con artists.
But for all the simps out there, let me just break it down for you to it's most basic message.
If something looks too good to be true, then chances are, it ISN'T true.
Glad you like it
To everybody sayin all ai music is trash yall gotta know there is dope ai music out here .. mine included 💯 Turned my small gaming channel into a ai music channel during the solar eclipse for a way to keep me focus on what I love doin which is creating beats & tracks .. got a few lit tracks gettin a lotta views which make me feel good that ppl chill to em. Idk how some ppl satisfied putting in a basic prompt just to get a pos track & then call it music .. Im use to writing my own lyrics anyway so I did that when I first started using Suno ai & after workin with it alot I learn to put diff prompts to get good results but when I started puttin in music notes manually with vocal tones, chord progressions, tempo, guitar riffs etc dayumm it put my tracks on another level 👀 Taste in music is subjective so that mean that diff ppl will chill to diff kinda music dont matter if made by ai or human .. if it bops it drops 🤟🏽 peace peace
There is a difference between using AI to make music, and using AI to make money, by abusing a system made for artists (which is the topic of this video).
@@clarkkent6354 I gave you a like bc I agree with what you said .. I make tracks bc its fun & keeps me focus on doin somthing positive. I got ppl tellin me I should put some of my tracks on spotify but I aint happy with the suno sound production sometimes it can sound echoey or muffled .. even tho I tweak it the track quality is still lacking so I wont ever put none of my tracks on spotify unless I could raise the sound quality. I think theres enough room on spotify for ai track creators like me & music artists but the ai track creators should put up quality tracks on spotify not the generic ai shit floating around on yt & instead of abusing the system they should use the system to share quality ai music with ppl bc aint that the whole fkn point ?
Tell me, do you have copyright over the AI made music?
No never. Only what is produced by a human. Had he written the lyrics at least, that portion could be copyrighted. He didn't feed the AI the lyrics. Anyone can use his track and he will have no leverage to enforce copyright. Even the cover art can't be claimed. Artist have it worse than musicians when it comes to AI. Write all the lyrics to have any chance for protection and claims.
U.S. Copyright Office AI Activities
The Office explained that human authorship is required for copyright protection, that it will refuse to register works solely generated by AI, and that any material which is not the product of human authorship must be disclaimed on a registration application.
no.
@@happyfndeplorable I get you. This AI at the moment gives artists no grounds when it comes to copied music. As they own diddly squat.
@@dagga07 Indeed.
Copyright law, concerning AI, hasn't even been written yet. And, as soon as they write something that cages AI, then the AI people are going to stretch the boundaries further, and further and further, until copyright will be a thing of the past because with AI you'll basically have 100% access to everything that's not nukes, n stuff. Bit like TPB, keep us locked up and tomorrow there'll be10, then 100, then 1,000 etc ad infinitum.
AI RULES!!!!! LETS MAKE AI MUSIC GUYS!!!
thanks bro
The sound is too poor , AI were trained with MP3 at 20KHZ, real music is a WAV at 48khz. The best choice is record in a studio the great ideas that AI have found, I have a friend that is a a famous producer that already work this way.
Its not cool its lame and lazy.
Agreed.
What will be interesting is when Suno drops V4. You will be able to upload your own sounds/music to the app and it will use that as a reference. I'm not sure how that will work with copyright as you are contributing to the generation output yourself.
If its your own music or audio that you upload then it will be your copyright as its your own ideas and creations being used then the A.i just becomes a tool to assist you.
@@dagga07 Glad I read your comment, that's really good to know because I write all of my songs myself I don't use chatGPT or any other AI that assists with writing
Just now you can do that...check suno.
That’s the already existent for around 12 days (ironically the day you posted this) in 3.5. It’s that bright yellow high visibility area that says “Upload Audio"
dont you need a 3000px x 3000px img for cover? also distrokid is a paid service...
That’s the standard but this guy doesn’t have any standards.
Meet us the Worlds first A.I girl band - # 6th 9 song Albums
"First A.I girl band" Yeah, right. Good luck with that.
@@GJYYNGII - exists
Soon Spotify will be flooded with AI albums. Only big known artists will survive this. Great video man!
If they're good albums, this is great news. I still look for all sorts of music personally and assume everyone does. Human and ai music. I'll listen to all of it.
Absolutely, the rise of AI in music is definitely going to shake things up on platforms like Spotify! However, I believe there's room for both established artists and new forms of AI music. Personally, I’m not looking to replace traditional artists but to add to the diversity of what’s available. Think of it like Alvin and the Chipmunks for the modern era-AI characters with unique personalities, like Suno and Udio, who bring something fun and different to the music scene. It’s all about expanding our musical horizons, not limiting them. Great insights in the video!
Junk music
@@giannipulli I gotta push back on the "junk music" label for AI. I've been listening to both AI and regular music recently, and AI has actually opened my eyes to how much repetitive stuff is out there, you know? Remakes, recycled styles - it's kind of like fast food music sometimes.
AI music, on the other hand, feels like a whole new genre. It's early days, sure, but it's got that TH-cam explosion vibe - rough around the edges, but with endless potential. Imagine what it could be like when it reaches a MrBeast level of polish! The creativity could be insane.
@@giannipulli Absolutely. Maybe this will be the final straw and the downfall of streaming services will accelerate now that every ignorant "creator" can upload junk like this.
lame.
Really cool video Matt, amazing to see what it can do and it will only get better!
Thanks Rob
I really think that's true. The tech will get better and I'll get better at producing this stuff.
In the future, I might even do another video that drills down further to make it even more yours.
I really appreciate the watch and the comment.
I'd love to make some money from my 30-track album of robot gangsta rap, but I'm afraid the robots aren't sentient yet, so I have no fan base.
I released a few demos with Suno with lyrics I wrote myself. I'm honestly not satisfied with not producing the songs myself, at least partly. Currently working on producing new versions that use much more of my own touch. Some AI will be used, mostly with vocals because I hate my own voice. But I really want my own touch to the music, beyond the lyrics.
AI should not be used for creating serious productions, at least not entirely. It's one thing to use some AI but still have your own touch to it, but to just have computers do it all and then release it as art is just soulless and stupid. I have some AI songs on my channel, yes, but those were just created as a gag. It's pop country with lyrics about Information Technology. But I'm not making money off of royalties with those. They were created as a joke. I hate bro country, don't care about the genre whatsoever, and did not want to waste any effort on something that is meant to be just a funny gag.
You and your get rich quick scheme represent the pond life of the internet.
Kool tune.
Can't get a copyright for any of it. You AI'd the whole damn thing. Even the cover art. Had you at least written the lyrics and fed those to the AI to generate the music for the track. Then you could copyright the lyrics portion of the song. You can make money off the track. just can't protect the track with the legal might of copyright. Anyone can use any and all of the track in their works without worries for compensation of any royalties to you. All you can collect is what you directly get setup for revenue streams. No outreach from DistroKid say on to someone's TH-cam channel that posts this track has to worry about real legalities. I'm sure there will be false copyright notices spammed. We can ignore all of it and just wade through the emails like we do now using licensed loop tracks we get hit up for now.
It's been a few weeks since I made this video. But I swear I mentioned that this was made very basic. I didn't alter the lyrics very much in the making of this video. Normally, I spend at least a week working the lyrics.
Hey, look up my other works. Praise Be Vinyl.
Enjoy the soothing sounds.
This song of mine (Metal) is partially done with UDIO. I mean, instrumental is something I've written, and the lyrics too. But the voices are not.
I am a guitarrist, so, guitars, bass and solos are me, but the rest is pure AI
th-cam.com/video/l0maOm_ap1Q/w-d-xo.html
This is not R&B at all
Suno is superb at lyrics. You are obviously not prompting universal subject matters. The one criticism is that it usually includes the genre in the lyrics so I regenerate after editing this out in the custom lyrics.
Agree, but ChatGPT wins hands down every time
both udio and suno use ChatGPT 3.5 for lyrics, why? cause its open source, no need to reinvent the wheel
This is more ...Rage against the music.
Claude 3 opus seems to generate really good lyrics way better then gpt for me
I'm sooo open to trying new stuff like that. Might even do a video on it. Thanks for the tip!!
You wont make any money. Music money is based off buys, streaming royalties pays nothing. You can have a streaming song with a million streams and only get 50 dollars from it, good luck trying to hit those numbers.
I bet you're single... that's the nicest way to put it.
I'm flattered but the nicest way for me to put this... Not interested
@@AiDIYTECH It's not an offer, something's wrong with you, period. Just looking at you... you are the definition of a "Red Flag"
You can't collect royalties on non copyrightable material... Anything generated by AI isn't copyrightable under the copyright act of 1976. Quit while you're ahead, this is soulless and boring.
There is nothing currently saying you can't copyright ai material. The biggest legal case said that one instance couldn't be. But nowhere does it state you can't.
And I'm sorry to hear that you don't appreciate my soothing and loving tunes. I feel very motivated to work harder and win you over. Subscribe and follow my channel.
@@AiDIYTECH You are pathetic. Complete fake.
@@AiDIYTECH Where's the legislation saying you CAN copyright AI music?
@@AiDIYTECH yes there is, on copyright dot gov they have faqs that explain their decision, and they detail that it has to be created by a human, and that prompting is not considered created by a human because copyright gov interprets the final production to be still all created by the ai. So they detail that what the human has created is the only part that can be copyrighted. So say you wrote the lyrics ,and prompted ai to do the music, you will fill that out on the copyright form, and the copyright office will approve copyright for the lyrics, but the music will not be copyrighted, but it will be noted to be ai created. So, in effect, you are listed to be the copyright owner for the lyrics part of the song. I have no idea how something like that can be marketed; all the same, since streaming pays garbage, in a way, it doesn't matter, as we are now giving away our labor in essence. Still if you endeavor to put this on spotify, it is better to take the ai music, and use it as inspiration to create your own, then you can claim ownership on the music as well. Still, you are working to get $0.003 per stream, and as of now, Spotify is not paying anything at all to artists who have less than 1,000 streams per month. So, as of April 2024, any song you put on Spotify will get you $0 each and ever month you have less than 1,000 streams. Those streams do not accumulate each passing month, but reset at 0 each new month, so it even more has become a losing effort to make money as an artist. And now this ai strategy to flood streaming platforms already flooded may cause other platforms to copy spotify to pay $0 if streams are less than 1,000, effectively making music as a profession, a joke due to massive saturation.
You should sell tickets to ride the roller coaster of butt hurt in your comments section, haha... Keep going, this is quite hilarious.
I know lol...
I do understand people want to protect their art. So I'm not totally deaf to it. We'll see how it all plays out. Thanks for the comment.
Yooo buddy you only want to keep lyrics in the lyrics spot. No titles or anything but lyrics.. if you want a great song to come out you can create your own style by combining multiple genras together and blend. Only use 6 to blend.. and think of words outside of the box to create a killer song..suno is not that good at all to use , try Donna..hmu any help u need im jimi check my music out you'll c I no what im talking about lol
They are blocking all AI music!!
good
One thing I don't like is people who just say stuff that isn't true.
You look like if Doug Stanhope didn't drink 😅
Thanks Sardine. I appreciate your views.
@@AiDIYTECH Great video too sir, I didn't mean it as a bad thing. You look sharp
haha, thanks CS, I wasn't sure but I didn't automatically take it as a bad thing. And I do very much appreciate your views. And when I said "views" I mean watching my video.
I wonder about the legalities. Udio generated a song for me with a voice that sounded exactly like Johnny Cash. I love the result, but it just seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen since his voice is so unique. Kind of like the whole OpenAI and Scar Jo controversy.
Set it up for private use, that's all protection is, in the public, private anything, pretty much, goes.
Did you ask Udio to make it sound like Johnny Cash or it was incidental?
@@kateanderson3779 incidental. I only specified "country"
You all need better AI music
That suno app is scary good
Good album cover
Thanks for that. Wish I could take all the credit. I had to laugh though
"if you're not a musician and you want to publish something to spotify" - now that, being a musician myself, just makes me cringe. i've barely come to grips with the whole splice samples culture over the last few years, but now this just blows my mind. it's disrespectful and demeaning to the art form itself and the people who have and still do put in hours upon hours of learning and then even more time and effort into creating their art, and i'm not even talking about talent at this point. i think im gonna stop here because if i don't this will turn into a two-hour long rant and i don't want to waste a minute more of my time here. goodbye.
I understand the feeling and I expected this.
In one of my more recent video's you can see at least one music industry person in an interview who thinks creating more access to creative tools is a good thing for the industry.
I'm not trying to win you over on this. I think it's too early to assume everyone is going to universally love this.
But not everyone in the music industry agrees that this is bad.
@@AiDIYTECH You do know that the "music industry" isn't the musicians friend, right? It's the real artists that struggle. The music industry is nothing more than a cash cow for business types, especially today.
I feel your pain. I record my own lyrics and I play the instruments. This guy has no integrity. I don't think non-musicians have any idea what goes into music. I pour my heart and soul into it, exposing my whole self to the world. And then this guy comes in and tells the computer to do it, and then to make money on it?! Talk about insult to injury. F***!
@@MichaelJamesWood i feel you
Keep making music, All ai music sounds great, I am a songwriter but can’t always afford to make a demo and pay a high price for a singer, just to have a record label not like it, then write my song have ai put music to my creation and all my family and friends want more. So it’s the industry that wants to stop my creativity, and the artist say I’m the problem. So you don’t think I put work into my lyrics, just because I don’t have a singing voice my creativity isn’t worth anything. Now we have a solution. I’d rather listen to everyday people’s creativity than the rinse and repeat shit the record labels put out.
dude looks like Doug Stanhope
lol...
Maybe I'm his Ai avatar.
Who wants to listen to this artificially intelligent synapse zombie garbage?
The future... That's who
Anyone can point me to link swhich say how exactly the AI law or regulation applied in any creative fields? Is the law bind globally or different for each countries ?
Stealing ideas not new things , copyright stealing in industrial design etc happens all the time , so where the law or regulations for it ?
Ask Bing ai
Only a human can claim copyright is where we currently are. Although the terms of use will try to say the app owns it, it’s not true… ai obviously didn’t do EVERYTHING, so they can’t claim ownership
Use mickey mouse creation, get mickey mouse results. Performance Rights ORganizations (ASCAP, BMI, SEASAC etc…) do not collect royalties on anything the US Copyright Office will not register which includes AI generated music or songs. They have their own AI's that instantly can detect if it is AI generated. Aside from Spotify usage there is no money. Anyone is free to rip-off your "masterpiece" . If you try to submit for media usage or licensing and it gets flagged, you can be sued for damages. A simple "sound-a-like" track cost its "content creator" $500k and they slapped a lien on his house faster than you can click your mouse.
Why so angry?
I think they do these videos once they discovered they are not making money then they make a tutorial video and cash in on that.
@officialsammygee not really.
They have a "try some ai tools and get comfortable using them."
Then they make a video.
Hello do you have a paid version of chat GPT? I tried to get a cover for my album but chat GPT denied
Hi, thanks for the question. Yes, I do have ChatGpt4 and it is a paid version. But you can try other free generation tools. Midjourney is great but you need to use it through their Discord.
@@AiDIYTECH Thanks for your reply, can I ask for Royalties if my song is sing by an AI , but the lyrics are mine?
It's such a grey area right now. The legislation was really focused on image creation when it comes to what is considered "yours". But it doesn't limit it to just image creation. It broadly says something like "If no human interaction in your art". But other than this song, I've done things to more than just the lyrics. I've done some audio editing and enhancements. So even though the music is sung by and the instruments are played by ai, there's still a lot of involvement on my part. Spotify and the music publishers don't ask and don't seem to care if ai have a hand in your production. So go ahead and ask for payments. It takes a long time to build up a payment though. Fractions of a cent on every play.
@@AiDIYTECH the reason they let you is so they can later sue you for a lot of money. spotify doesnt care if your music is legal or not as its not them at risk. you wont get royalties please check out Top music Attorneys youtube channel to see that you are giving out the wrong information.
@@rifsz you can get royalties if you wrote the lyrics. you will get the writers proportion of the royalties but you will not get any for the singer portion as you are not the singer. if the singer is A.I then nobody gets the singers portion of the royalties.
Really useful video.
I got into doing these songs a couple of weeks ago and haven't had this much fun in years.
I've had comments telling me to put my stuff on Spotify but have never used Spotify, is it worth going on?
Use Apple, Spotify will screw you over. There's videos about this, that is how i know
It is fun. It's mostly about the fun. Haters gonna hate.
How much were the royalties?
Hopefully zero.
About 0.0003 on the dollar, but someone said Spotify are highwaymen
@@ratatatuffit won't be zero coz if you do the right lyrics you going to attract many people even if it's done with AI as long as all the lyrics you write yourself and the sound is right you will get royalty from any music streamer so some of the real artist made their money it's time for normal people to make some extra income so they can buy some nice stuff as well as normal people made rich the artist people as they are still lessening to their favorite artist like I do with Eminem I grow up with him and I will still lessen to him until I die anyway to future is here everyone should embrace it as it will get bigger in the next 5 years alot bigger 😊
@@ratatatuffdoubt that. I make about 10 bucks a week.
Your opening statement where you said you had an "original" song made through "AI tools" is an oxymoron and then to top it off with making money for it is a huge insult to working musicians. Shameful.
I'm guessing you don't use any ai tools then?
Lol, the wat you are trying to enjoy the music 😂😅
that's called stealing man. you are hurting the real artists , you didn't created any original song, please don't delude yourself.
The average listener doesn't care if he created it or not, if it's good they will listen. Welcome to the future.
The future is now, old man
which song did he copy? It just sounds like any other rock song.
The real artists that only use 4 chords in slightly different orders and the little girls they get to sing over them.
Yes I’ve tried Udio, it’s just fast food fast music, thought it was impressive at first then thought I didn’t create it and then felt empty ..
do you know you cant copyright A.I music? you wont be able to get royalties and anyone can use it.
Sorry to come to this a bit late. I was having a chat to a friend of mine last night about this topic. He's been in a band and writes his own music etc.
Nobody ever said you can't copywrite AI music. From my understand, nobody has done it yet. There's nothing saying you can't do it. And for sure, you absolutely protect the lyrics that you write. Totally happy to be told otherwise. But what good would the music be without the words?
@@AiDIYTECH…of course AI can generate the words also. I guess it depends on your prompts to the AI engine.
@AiDIYTECH check out Top music Attorney youtube channel, she explains that courts have ruled that you cannot Copyright A.i created work. Prompting a.i. is not enough to classify it as your own work. Also you cannot collect royalties from a.i. music and what ever you create will be public domain so anyone else can use it. Best place to get your info in this case is the music Attorneys. You clearly used chat gpt for lyrics too so they cannot be Copyright protected either. If you register it as your own work you are breaking current laws.
@@AiDIYTECH youtube.com/@topmusicattorney?si=qsJIRzHoJLOmvxgk
@dagga07 What if you only use the AI to generate songs you've written lyrics for and then simply using the AI output as a template for live musicians to expand upon further? Surely THAT could be copyrighted?
this is interesting, thanks for sharing this idea. how much have you made in royalties to date?
Hi! great content! I have some questions. What will happen if I upload the song from free Suno to Distrokid to be distributed to Spotify? Will the music get banned? Is there any other distributors approve AI music?
Thank you in advance!
if you do that you will probably be sued for a lot of money first by suno as they say you cannot use any music you generate if you only have a free account. second distrokid because you cannot register music with them if you dont own it. andyou cannot own it as you cannot copyright a.i. generated work.
Hi, sorry for the late reply.
I did read the terms a while back. I believe with Suno, if you have a paid subscription, it's yours and they mentioned that you don't have to credit. But say something along the lines of "But it would be nice". (Terms change, so have a look).
The free version, they require you to give them credit.
@@AiDIYTECH The credit is in the watermark, having a free account and not crediting them, for instance downloading an audio file from them, would be poor form. As for 'Muh ownership' and all that gibberish, they may have legal title, but as for equitable title, they can't make without clients. Obviously SONY et al are going to take judges on vaykay with their 'advocats', in bikinis, and sometimes not, but as to whether they'd be right would merely be their opinion. Let's say the tech wasn't wrapped up in iron clad monopoly world, and people had genuine means to freely express, using SUNO, how much are they going to make when they're a literal household name. Jack and Jane from down the lane could host their own original parties for free, using music they've created, why would you want to spoil Jack and Jane's fun just because of the money? If there's means to make, super, and when there's means to offset it with fame, then even superer. Look at charities, their basic idea was to help people freely, look at the size now of that industry, it's a no brainer. Sure, if you have servers to pay for etc, then yeah, you need to balance the books, but when your like Samsung, and have $300 trillion that you don't know what to do with, then it's time to do the right thing. SUNO sponsored by Samsung for a better world?
Not only does it dilute the pot but it literally steals from genuine artists who are already *massively* struggling. Take a good look in the mirror and give your head a wobble mate - this is just embarrassing.
Hope you're not using chat gpt or any sort of ai that borrows from other sources and people who have contributed to those sources. Or is it just bad if using ai for music? Just asking.
I'd love to have a conversation with you sometime...I do things very similar to what you're doing here.
This is an insult and a betrayal to the human musicians your software is stealing from. All you are doing is leaching royalties away from people who actually earned them. It's only a matter of time until all music on Spotify made in the 2020's is ineligible for royalties.
I totally agree that this is one opinion that people including you have.
@@AiDIYTECH Did ChatGPT write this comment for you? It doesn't make any sense.
Thumbs down, blocking. Thanks. Ba bye!!
:(