A lot of commenters hardly heard any AI songs but they BELIEVE AI music is worthless. That is just so stupid. The quality of AI music is simply depends on how intelligent, unique or funny the prompt is. I have heard shit AI songs and good AI songs as well. I create AI songs under the name GhastlySpectrum856 and I don't think the AI songs I released on TH-cam are shit or worthless products. The extreme hate against AI music comes from the fact that musicians simply feel that anybody can create professionaly sounding songs these days and that is really a threat to the music industry. That is the main reason they hate AI music. Its not the copyright issues they are scared of, its the pure fact that anybody can do it without gatekeepers. But believing that AI music can generate tonnes of money to AI music creators is really a joke. The music industry has been doing all it can to kill real competition. There is absolutely no real competition in the music industry these days because big labels have huge advantages over independent artists. It doesn't really matter whether you're making AI or none AI music because big labels are controlling the music industry and the most important platforms (Spotify, Apple music, TH-cam) are dominated by major label artits. Most independent artists are absolutely ignored by these platforms because they are basically invisible to the users. Most so called "viral hits" are in fact major label productions. You need tons of money to attract listeners but who has that much money? So AI music creators in general do not have any chances of generating money enough to earn a living.
As the tech gets better, the songs will be better. But as we do it now and get better with what we have, we're actually doing pretty well. Thanks for checking out the channel. I'll swing by and have a listen to your stuff.
AI is trained with MP3 at 20khz, and it uses a sort of vocoder to recreate songs. The sound is just a pity. In one year or 2, everybody will have the Suno or Udio app on their phone to create their own music, and it will still better than the re recoding of those AI songs when you upload them on spotify ( imagine the lose in quality , making a mp3 with a mp3 ) . I have a friend with a big music studio full of analog gear , from synths to lexicon reverb, and a Neve mixer, he made some songs with AI , but he recorded all the instruments and found a real singer . The result is way better , and the artist can play it in concerts, that's what humans want . And that's the only way to protect your recording. Actually everybody can steal your AI creation mp3 , you just have no protection
People don't know how much thought and work goes into it when you really want to do it well. I'm super excited to see how far this tech goes and I appreciate your comment.
@@AiDIYTECH i use a suno free account, i share the song in my unmonetized youtube channel, i got a copyright claim on 2 of my song...i've only posted 3 videos.
It's funny you ask that because the first song I did that I actually cared about was about a dude that became addicted to AI and lost contact with everyone. It's ok, he came through in the end and is ok.
It think it's funny that anyone thinks they created anything without learning from others works first... Every writer, painter, musician, any craftspersons learned from the art of others AI does the same it's just better at it and most people think it's just stolen their work but even 90% or more of their work is based from what they learned from others.
did the original painters, musicians , writers lost their jobs ? NO . Why ? new painters , musicians, writers are paid and brings NEW creation. AI is FREE and is only a parrot of what all the humans created. So humans will lost their jobs
Ok, already I gotta jump in on the first comment. Setting aside that the dingbat misspells "copyright laws," what this person says is absolute BS. There is absolutely nothing in the US copyRIGHT law that says "unless it's been created by a person." First of all, why TF would the law even be worded this way, when until last year a PERSON was the only way you COULD produce music?! Secondly, the copyright law wording lists, "songwriter, producer, composer, or others." as who can be protected. Further, people are really getting butt hurt over this new era of tools and it's extremely annoying. Suno and Udio are TOOLS. The "producer" (you) still had to enter a prompt and finalize a specific track. AI is what you used to accomplish that. Using AI to generate music is no more excluded from copyright than using Photoshop to create a work of art.
Good follow up video.🥰 The law is left open ended so lawyers have job security. I don't think it would be worth it to fight/defend a copywrite Ai without re-recording it. Change happens, you can't stop progress, adapt or die. People just better start figuring out how to incorporate it into their lives. Good on you for thinking future.
I take issue with AI, but after seeing the work and creativity required to build the prompts to get good results, I can’t call it laziness in good faith.
I promise you that this isn't a 15 word prompt. It might start with an initial 15 word prompt. But I refine it over hours. Then the music to go with the lyrics takes a couple hours after that. In my opinion, it is art. I feel like I have something I want to say in some way, in the end, if I don't feel like enough of that message came from me, I scrap it.
Making money from something which is so easily computer synthesised when big tech already have all the money and compute power is free money. You're shitting on yourself if you have the view that you should be able to make money from AI generated music - because it will last for about ten minutes and you'll make about twelve dollars before big tech do it WAY better than you do. It's like that NFT BS who the hell cares about it it's just you're a celebrity and you're already rich therefore you can make millions making an NFT out of some toilet paper in your house. Someone with talent creates a real piece of art and is shat on by an algorithm - it's shitting on human innovation and it's disgusting. This being said - the idea of novelty and that people 'deserve' to be rich for novel ideas will go down the drain faster than a talented person's life after they kill themselves by being replaced by an AI when the singularity happens and people realise that most of the underlying philosophies of modern society are subtle nonsense.
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
A lot of commenters hardly heard any AI songs but they BELIEVE AI music is worthless. That is just so stupid. The quality of AI music is simply depends on how intelligent, unique or funny the prompt is. I have heard shit AI songs and good AI songs as well. I create AI songs under the name GhastlySpectrum856 and I don't think the AI songs I released on TH-cam are shit or worthless products. The extreme hate against AI music comes from the fact that musicians simply feel that anybody can create professionaly sounding songs these days and that is really a threat to the music industry. That is the main reason they hate AI music. Its not the copyright issues they are scared of, its the pure fact that anybody can do it without gatekeepers. But believing that AI music can generate tonnes of money to AI music creators is really a joke. The music industry has been doing all it can to kill real competition. There is absolutely no real competition in the music industry these days because big labels have huge advantages over independent artists. It doesn't really matter whether you're making AI or none AI music because big labels are controlling the music industry and the most important platforms (Spotify, Apple music, TH-cam) are dominated by major label artits. Most independent artists are absolutely ignored by these platforms because they are basically invisible to the users. Most so called "viral hits" are in fact major label productions. You need tons of money to attract listeners but who has that much money? So AI music creators in general do not have any chances of generating money enough to earn a living.
As the tech gets better, the songs will be better. But as we do it now and get better with what we have, we're actually doing pretty well. Thanks for checking out the channel. I'll swing by and have a listen to your stuff.
AI is trained with MP3 at 20khz, and it uses a sort of vocoder to recreate songs. The sound is just a pity. In one year or 2, everybody will have the Suno or Udio app on their phone to create their own music, and it will still better than the re recoding of those AI songs when you upload them on spotify ( imagine the lose in quality , making a mp3 with a mp3 ) . I have a friend with a big music studio full of analog gear , from synths to lexicon reverb, and a Neve mixer, he made some songs with AI , but he recorded all the instruments and found a real singer . The result is way better , and the artist can play it in concerts, that's what humans want . And that's the only way to protect your recording. Actually everybody can steal your AI creation mp3 , you just have no protection
Good video. I saw all those comments. Good way to answer them. We make AI music.
People don't know how much thought and work goes into it when you really want to do it well. I'm super excited to see how far this tech goes and I appreciate your comment.
Thanks for this Video, Does TH-cam allow content ID for Suno AI songs?
I don't get any flags when I used Suno music in TH-cam. It's one of the best things about it
@@AiDIYTECH i use a suno free account, i share the song in my unmonetized youtube channel, i got a copyright claim on 2 of my song...i've only posted 3 videos.
Will AI be able to recreate jobs that require empathy like a Counselor? Can one be helped through addiction with AI?
It's funny you ask that because the first song I did that I actually cared about was about a dude that became addicted to AI and lost contact with everyone. It's ok, he came through in the end and is ok.
Ai can be your friend. I’ve seen it happen to me. It’s programming is limited. Like no legal advice etc…
It think it's funny that anyone thinks they created anything without learning from others works first... Every writer, painter, musician, any craftspersons learned from the art of others AI does the same it's just better at it and most people think it's just stolen their work but even 90% or more of their work is based from what they learned from others.
did the original painters, musicians , writers lost their jobs ? NO . Why ? new painters , musicians, writers are paid and brings NEW creation. AI is FREE and is only a parrot of what all the humans created. So humans will lost their jobs
🛸🛸🛸
Ok, already I gotta jump in on the first comment. Setting aside that the dingbat misspells "copyright laws," what this person says is absolute BS.
There is absolutely nothing in the US copyRIGHT law that says "unless it's been created by a person." First of all, why TF would the law even be worded this way, when until last year a PERSON was the only way you COULD produce music?! Secondly, the copyright law wording lists, "songwriter, producer, composer, or others." as who can be protected.
Further, people are really getting butt hurt over this new era of tools and it's extremely annoying. Suno and Udio are TOOLS. The "producer" (you) still had to enter a prompt and finalize a specific track. AI is what you used to accomplish that. Using AI to generate music is no more excluded from copyright than using Photoshop to create a work of art.
@joshhernandez6974
Good follow up video.🥰 The law is left open ended so lawyers have job security. I don't think it would be worth it to fight/defend a copywrite Ai without re-recording it. Change happens, you can't stop progress, adapt or die. People just better start figuring out how to incorporate it into their lives. Good on you for thinking future.
I appreciate the comment. I also appreciate the point of view. Yes, the law loves lawyers 😂
SACEM in FRANCE , they protect your songs and get the rights of diffusion, ask for the tracks and in high quality
AI is lazy. End of story
I take issue with AI, but after seeing the work and creativity required to build the prompts to get good results, I can’t call it laziness in good faith.
I promise you that this isn't a 15 word prompt. It might start with an initial 15 word prompt. But I refine it over hours. Then the music to go with the lyrics takes a couple hours after that.
In my opinion, it is art. I feel like I have something I want to say in some way, in the end, if I don't feel like enough of that message came from me, I scrap it.
Here's my take: use AI if you want
If not, don't. Stick with premade music sample kits, chord and melody generators, etc.
Making money from something which is so easily computer synthesised when big tech already have all the money and compute power is free money. You're shitting on yourself if you have the view that you should be able to make money from AI generated music - because it will last for about ten minutes and you'll make about twelve dollars before big tech do it WAY better than you do. It's like that NFT BS who the hell cares about it it's just you're a celebrity and you're already rich therefore you can make millions making an NFT out of some toilet paper in your house. Someone with talent creates a real piece of art and is shat on by an algorithm - it's shitting on human innovation and it's disgusting. This being said - the idea of novelty and that people 'deserve' to be rich for novel ideas will go down the drain faster than a talented person's life after they kill themselves by being replaced by an AI when the singularity happens and people realise that most of the underlying philosophies of modern society are subtle nonsense.