That distance is pushing it for active target but I think you could expect pretty good performance with down imaging. Using 800khz down imaging cone angle in 150 feet of water you should be viewing 125’ of ground below your boat. If you switch to a lower frequency, like 455khz, you will get even greater coverage (230 feet) of bottom but at less detail. Since you are looking for something that big, 455 kHz will get you close, then you can switch to 800 kHz for better detail on your second pass. Thanks for the comment!
![[Part 1] ทารกน้อยถูกทิ้ง👶 หญิงชราเก็บขวดขายเลี้ยงดูเขาจนโต #โลกการละคร](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nPTDvFCExks/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it!
I need to find a b-29 bomber in 150’ of lake water… can this unit pull that off in your experience?
That distance is pushing it for active target but I think you could expect pretty good performance with down imaging. Using 800khz down imaging cone angle in 150 feet of water you should be viewing 125’ of ground below your boat. If you switch to a lower frequency, like 455khz, you will get even greater coverage (230 feet) of bottom but at less detail. Since you are looking for something that big, 455 kHz will get you close, then you can switch to 800 kHz for better detail on your second pass. Thanks for the comment!
That is one thing garmin has on live target. I can run side imaging and my luvescope without interference
One of a few features I think! I can shut off my sidescan transducer and the interference goes away but then I’m not mapping the bottom anymore!
@@stringtheoryangling with garmin I can still map without interference