Pierre Cochereau - Mass No. 4 - IV. Sortie

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @ivanmaric8448
    @ivanmaric8448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Finally!
    I've been listening to this for years ... and now I'm watching. read the book of revelation and listen to this .... magnificent

  • @yeetthebeet
    @yeetthebeet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Absolutely insane that this was improovised!

    • @joshuag.4873
      @joshuag.4873 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It would be much easier to improvise something like this than to read it off a score!

  • @yagiz885
    @yagiz885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Such an epic opening, thanks for the score.

    • @yagiz885
      @yagiz885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chronochromie772 piano supremacy

  • @virtuoso4107
    @virtuoso4107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This impro was selected by Pierre Pincemaille with many others gathered in the "L'organiste liturgique" (SOCD 226).

  • @user-nk5jb8dj1s
    @user-nk5jb8dj1s 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    FABULEUX ! Le génie de Pierre Cochereau sous nos yeux, et dans nos oreilles.
    On imagine le travail qu'il a fallu pour réaliser la transcription.
    A la fin de la présentation il y a un lien permettant de se procurer la partition.

  • @wilfriedvomacka1783
    @wilfriedvomacka1783 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This left me speechless 😮

  • @BrunoMégara
    @BrunoMégara 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Le BOSS !

  • @richy77
    @richy77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This actually sounds so great

  • @josephnguyen6878
    @josephnguyen6878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Fantastic that there's a transcription! Unfortunate that it doesn't seem to have been made by an organist though.

    • @guscox9651
      @guscox9651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I think the somewhat vaugue indications like "brighter" are actually the best thing you could write in this case. If youre too specific youll probably be wrong and make it impossible for anyone to play it on their local organ

    • @cliveso
      @cliveso 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. Whoever transcribed it either knows jack shit about the organ, or is a very poor organist.

    • @cliveso
      @cliveso 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Gus Cox
      It's much worse than that. The "registration" indications are the least of the problems. Really you need to have a masterful understanding of organ playing, the French organ tradition and the instrument at Notre Dame to have any hope of making a vaguely decent transcription of anything, let alone Cochereau. Most of what this Lara Poe person has notated 1) sounds nothing like what's played, 2) is highly un-idiomatic for the organ, and 3) would sound awful if played. It's a downright piece of junk. Sorry I'm genuinely quite angry about it - this transcription is an insult to the legendary improvisor, and an insult to Stephen Tharp.

    • @guscox9651
      @guscox9651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cliveso Unfortunately, using DNA analysis, scientists have found that Marie Guérin was morbidly obese.

    • @laraepoe
      @laraepoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ​@@cliveso sorry to hear you feel this way. I would say that I do have a decent knowledge of the French tradition, although am not an organist myself (as you have said). As Gus has said, I tried to indicate things like "brighter" to give the performer freedom, as different organs have different registrations and I wanted this to be something people could play from. It's definitely possible that I may have missed some notes, as the acoustics and registrations can make it quite difficult to hear the final details at times. Are there any particular inaccuracies you're referring to? Cheers!

  • @ianstafford2218
    @ianstafford2218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My God! Mind blowing. Fine after Mass in a continental Cathedral. Imagine playing this in an English provincial Cathedral after Eucharist (if the assistant organist was capable!). He/She would be fired!

  • @originaltommy
    @originaltommy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brighter and brighter? Mon Dieu...

    • @joshuag.4873
      @joshuag.4873 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Loved the dynamic markings!!

  • @antoniboleslawowicz8095
    @antoniboleslawowicz8095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Where can I get a copy of the score?

  • @eremitaorgao
    @eremitaorgao 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow! how did I not know this piece before?

    • @georgemurphy2579
      @georgemurphy2579 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No text - words - cannot be sung - not a song!
      A work, piece, composition - - - or - - - a compositional title
      Scherzo, Fete, Final. Toccata - - - take your pick - - -
      But, not a song.

  • @jmdujardin
    @jmdujardin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    inimitable patte du Maître P. Cochereau : rythme endiablé staccato, traits de pédale basse enlevés, alternance des anches en batterie (chamades de NDdP qu'il affectionnait) et des fonds moelleux ...C'était tout lui, en improvisation de sortie de messe...

  • @richardlowe4751
    @richardlowe4751 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why so many notes missing?

  • @georgemurphy2579
    @georgemurphy2579 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Fifth Opera in Wagner's "Ring."

  • @buspalladium1880
    @buspalladium1880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ca c'est de l'orgue. Seul le Maitre Cochereau savait faire sonner ce qui était un merveilleux instrument, avant qu'il ne soit saccagé par les "organistes" actuels...

    • @GuillaumeDeslandres
      @GuillaumeDeslandres 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      L'existence même de tels commentaires ici en dit plus sur leur auteur que sur ses victimes.

    • @МиоМой
      @МиоМой ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Noch Pierre Pinsmail. Aber Cocherau ist, natürlich, besser!

    • @buspalladium1880
      @buspalladium1880 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GuillaumeDeslandresÉtant organiste moi même, je sais de quoi je parle. J'ai joué à plusieurs reprises à Notre Dame. J'ai connu le Maître, et je connais les actuels. Autant mettre le soleil à côté d'une motte de terre.

    • @buspalladium1880
      @buspalladium1880 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@МиоМойJe l'ai très bien connu. Un autre génie !

    • @GuillaumeDeslandres
      @GuillaumeDeslandres 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@buspalladium1880 Ne changez rien, ce serait dommage.

  • @benoitducene466
    @benoitducene466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    a rather inaccurate score... which only shows why these improvisations must remain an instant of creative genius, not recreated. Cochereau would have been furious!

    • @benoitducene466
      @benoitducene466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@chronochromie772 Well, there are far more notes than are written, for a start! But, having played several Cochereau improvisations from transcribed scores over the years, it is always artistically superior to enjoy Cochereau playing them as they were intended, that is: "the spontaneous uttering of an illusory art".

    • @SuperRechercheur
      @SuperRechercheur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@benoitducene466 Ja, genau! C´est ca!

    • @joshuag.4873
      @joshuag.4873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I assume this was just for fun. Still brilliant in any case.

  • @cliveso
    @cliveso 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here is a much more competent transcription. It's by no means perfect, but at least it is idiomatic and playable, and is actually played and recorded:
    th-cam.com/video/qk1A3KNzkBM/w-d-xo.html

  • @marcopol217
    @marcopol217 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That´s music for the devil. Not for God.