ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 เม.ย. 2024
- Virtual particles, the invisible actors in the quantum world, play a significant role in shaping our reality. Despite their intangible nature, these elusive particles have sparked the curiosity of many scientific minds. In this video, we'll be demystifying virtual particles, providing you with a comprehensive understanding of their existence, and exploring their mind-boggling implications.
![ชวนน้องลงทุ่ง - เงาะน้อยเพชรบ้านแพง X น้องมายด์ [ Music Video ] Official Saman Music](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bq7Hw9culjE/mqdefault.jpg)
self proclaimed "best lecture". Very humble
Please explain the mass shell concept.
།གཟུགས་ལས་སྟོང་པ་ཉིད་གཞན་མ་ཡིན། 😮
These "elusive" blighters, accounts for dark matter. Astronomers estimate roughly 85% of all matter in the universe is dark matter, meaning only 15% of all matter is norma (baryonic)l matter.
Crackpot.
Very helpful. Thank you.
You're welcome!
Hello Curt and Neil,
For simplicity, try this. Everything that exists in the universe is composed of just two incredibly small Monopole Particles. All of the particles making up the standard model table of particles, are composites of these two particles.
This is explained in a TOE called ' The Two Monopole Particle Unvierse '.
In this hypothesis, I do offer a precise description that I can prove of the existance of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, which I propose is one of the two forces of Gravity.
You need to forget the mathematics for a moment and look at the problems logically in the first instant. What I propose is a completely new model, not dependent on any preconceived ideas and works logically.
I disagree with Einstein's description of gravity, and this is why QM can't be reconciled with Cosmology. Also, as you say in this video, Einstines equations do not work with Black Holes. I offer an alternative explanation for Black Holes.
The whole concept of black holes as described in this video is a contradiction in terms and wrong.
The centre of a black hole is said to be an area of immense gravity, HOW? Nothing makes sense. If there was an incredibly strong force of gravity at the centre of a black hole, there would not be an event horizon, as all of the matter surrounding the black hole would be drawn in and a new star would be formed, it is mathematical nonsense.
The same applies to the description of a black hole being formed by a supernova casting off its outer layer and the core collapsing under its own gravity, to form the centre of a black hole. This again is mathematical nonsense. There are many celestial bodies in the universe that are not active stars with an outward pressure, but they do not collapse into bodies of immense gravity, they are just normal baryonic matter like our earth.
Forget the maths for a moment and look at it logically. Gravity is a product of mass and has nothing to do with bending of space. If a star explodes, the whole star and all of its matter will be expelled into space, along with all of its gravity, leaving an area where the star was void of aggregate matter, an area devoid of matter will have no gravity, and result in a black hole.
Because the star would have been rotating, the resulting debris from the exploded star would also continue to rotate, and all of the matter would be forced out by centrifugal force, but also each of the pieces of matter would be trying to coagulate into larger masses. Add to this the 'Dark Energy ' produced by ' Dark Matter ', which I propose consists of a cloud of negatively charged Monopole particles, which permeate the whole of the universe, will be pushing the Baryonic matter back inwards.
A balance is reached where there will exist an embryonic galaxy of varying pieces of matter, which over billions of years will accrete more matter and grow, the larger masses forming new stars, and at the centre there will exist a basic vortex of empty space except for the ' Dark Matter ' producing the negative repulsive force of ' Dark Energy '.
This is more fully explained in a recently published book called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe by ' Tony Norman Marsh '. If you type Tony Norman Marsh into google, details will be shown. If you can supply me with an email address, I will send you a copy of my manuscript for your perusal, or it can be viewed quickly on ‘ Kindle ‘. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
The Big Bang and Cosmic Inflation are both physically impossible and never happened.
It is the misconception that the universe is expanding that has led to many of the problems in cosmology. I contend that the universe is not expanding: It has no age because it has always existed much as it is now: It will exist forever much as it is now: There was no Big Bang or cosmic inflation: The CMBR is not the afterglow of the big bang, but a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation, and Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to the loss of speed and energy of electromagnetic radiation over distance and time it has travelled.
.
There has just been published an hypothesis called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ' by ' Tony Norman Marsh ', which fully explains all of this Logically. If you type in Tony Norman Marsh into Google, details will be shown.
This hypothesis can also explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Antimatter, and two forces of gravity, amongst other things.
If you can provide an email address, I can send you a copy of the manuscript, or it can be read instantly on Kindle. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
Crackpot alert.
Flintstones, meet the Flintstones, they're a modern Stone age family, from the, town of bedrock, they're a page right out of history, WilllllllMaaaaaa
Ok now you've kept pretty much close to the current physics dogma on virtual particles.
But now you need to work out why the time-energy uncertainty principle allows virtual particles and or virtual waves to result in the permanent removal of energy from the vacuum in the casimir effect, the lamb shift and tunnelling.
The time- energy uncertainty principle only allows for an extremely short period of energy borrowing. But all these effect result in a permanent borrowing of energy and on macroscopic scales when considering the number of particles they effect.
(The time-energy uncertainty principle can be stated as: Δ𝐸Δ𝑡 ≥ ℏ2
where Δ𝐸is the uncertainty in the measurement of energy, Δ𝑡 is the time interval during which the measurement is made, and ℏ (h-bar) is the reduced Planck constant.)
Thus the principle of the time-energy uncertainty principle has been violated - permanently.
A contradiction like this is highly non- trivial. And tells you the principle is wrong and an elaborate myth with no actual real basis.
The reality is that the virtual particles ( e- e+) are real but bound to each other.
Then things get really interesting....
I look forward to your next novel
@@Epoch11 Hello, Thank you for your reply.
I am not sure if this is a genuine or sarcastic reply. I will just say that I am very serious about what I propose, As a 74 year old succcessful inventor, with patents granted, I looked at the problems in QM and Cosmology logically as if I was inventing somthing new.
If you type Tony Norman Marsh into google, you willl see details of my hypothesis that has been published as a book and on Kindle. I had to do it this way to get it into the public domain, as not being part of the academic community, I was not able to do it as a scientific paper.
You wil see by the price, I have not done it for the money. Take a look at what I propose, and prove me wright or wrong. I am happy to answer any questions you have. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.