Understanding the SI Units (meters, seconds, kg, kelvin, coulomb, candela) MCAT Physics Chemistry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @333bugeye
    @333bugeye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    This video literally changed my physics life. All I have ever heard is "in physics units are everything" but all I was doing was trying to memorize everything and it wasn't working. I finally understand the connections. Thank you so much

    • @elizabetha.morgan1869
      @elizabetha.morgan1869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Me too, just started physic's and into week 2 and onto week 3 in a few days.

  • @willfrye1987
    @willfrye1987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I really hope you realize how amazing these videos are.

  • @jdehj5422
    @jdehj5422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    man your vids are GOLD

  • @iramnelson523
    @iramnelson523 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you so much for making this video! It has clarified my confusion alot.

  • @KT-pw1cq
    @KT-pw1cq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Is there a mistake with the resistance fundamental units? should it be C^2 not S^2? 14:50

    • @chidotanatsa
      @chidotanatsa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep caught that as well I'm pretty sure its coulombs squared

  • @thesixthcourier
    @thesixthcourier 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this video Joe, hope you are doing well!

  • @Flynn-hl7ug
    @Flynn-hl7ug 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brilliant video

  • @bouchser000
    @bouchser000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    holy shit I feel like I am back into my physics lecture seat.

  • @bretthart5008
    @bretthart5008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    havent watched the whole video yet, but charge should be under Ampere (if were being consistent with IUPAC), although I agree the unit of charge should be the coulomb as the ampere is a derived unit

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I struggled with that point.. I wondered whether I should be consistent with IUPAC defined list of SI units.. my impression was the ampere being an official SI unit was an artifact and I worried it’d be confusing using c/s as a base unit and people would be confused why I didn’t use charge and time as separate base units.. but I was aware of that and wasn’t sure what would be the best way to organize the video

  • @elihubildad6677
    @elihubildad6677 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These units are tools man has invented to understand physical phenomena in the universe ,the universe is not made up of them .

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m not asserting you’re right or wrong, but I am curious to hear you elaborate why you say that?

    • @TheLORDismylightandmysalvation
      @TheLORDismylightandmysalvation 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sciencesimplified3890 He's probably saying this because we as humans are just trying to explain the creation and laws of God, in ways that our minds can comprehend. But we can never truly comprehend. Its good to stay humble and understand that we are just men. All praise to Jesus Christ. Good video btw.

  • @profeluisegarcia
    @profeluisegarcia 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ¡m. 3:25 nanosecond et al....mistakes? How it is possible to publish these wrong information¡

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What’s the mistake?

    • @L0v3Purp13
      @L0v3Purp13 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sciencesimplified3890 giga, macro, and kilo have negative exponents when they're really positive. and milli, micro, and nano are supposed to be negative exponents

  • @osant9940
    @osant9940 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    isnt nano 10-9

  • @FrontierThesisYU
    @FrontierThesisYU ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are you still around? Would love to shoot you an email :)

  • @ZackAG
    @ZackAG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, I believe "giga" is 0.000000001 and macro (or mega) should be 0.000001. In the video, there is one too many zeroes for both of these!

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah yes... you’re correct... Im so used to adding 0’s in groups of 3 but yes you’re correct!

    • @ZackAG
      @ZackAG 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sciencesimplified3890 Haha no worries, everyone makes mistakes from time to time. Your video is amazing by the way and has helped immensely in my circuits/electrostatics studying for the MCAT.

    • @natethanerd
      @natethanerd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ZackAG 3 years later... how'd you do? just started studying and chem/phys is a section I'll have to work on the most!

    • @ZackAG
      @ZackAG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@natethanerd haha oh my forgot about this! I ended up scoring in the 97th percentile for C/P and am currently in med school :). Let me know if I can help in any way!

  • @AcademyofJannat
    @AcademyofJannat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a little too underatedddddddddd

  • @chm000001
    @chm000001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is such a helpful video thank you so much!! But in the beginning when you write out the values for mili, micro, nano, kilo, macro, giga, etc.. I think they're ordered backwards? Like, isn't mili=0.001, not 1000? and micro is 0.000001, not 1,000,000?

    • @bikramchohansingh2329
      @bikramchohansingh2329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1mm = 0.001 m, if u multiply 1000 to both sides, u'' get 1000mm = 1m.

  • @nilanabijan3070
    @nilanabijan3070 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For God's sake,, am begging u please make a video on Torque

  • @ahcamoes
    @ahcamoes ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is mole?

  • @MindyFosterlol
    @MindyFosterlol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doing the lord's work for resident physics idiot here 😅 Great video man!

  • @GodAloneIsGood
    @GodAloneIsGood ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have made an incredible video, and you have said it well that "the way our universe was created", because that it was by our God, our God who has given even His only son, Jesus Christ for us. He has withheld no gifts.

  • @asaplocky
    @asaplocky 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I hope your pillow is always cool on both sides, your charger works at every single angle, you NEVER stub your toe or step on a lego, and one day you win the lottery. Thank u for ur service 🫡